Abstract
Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a widely used method for accurate quantitative gene expression analysis. For accurate quantitative verification of RT-qPCR, it is essential to select a reference gene with high expression stability depending on the experimental environment or the different tissues. In this study, we evaluated the stability of nine candidate reference genes, labeled elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1A), ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1-like isoform x2 (ERRFI), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), integrin beta2 like (ITGB2), phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein-like isoform x3 (PICALM), 60 s ribosomal protein L5 (RPL5), 60 s ribosomal protein L7 (RPL7), tubulin beta chain (TUBB), and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A (UBE2A), in the brain (including pituitary gland) gonads and caudal fins of silvertip tetra (Hasemania nana) males and females. The stability evaluation of the reference gene was analyzed using a program based on the geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RankAggreg algorithms. As a result, RPL5 (brain, caudal fin), EF1A (gonad), and PICALM (three tissue types) genes were evaluated as the most stable genes in silvertip tetra females. In males, TUBB (brain, caudal fin) and ITGB2 (gonads, three tissue types) genes were the most stable, and in both sexes, TUBB (brain), ITGB2 (caudal fin), RPL5 (gonads), and PICALM (three tissue types) genes are considered appropriate as reference genes for qRT-PCR analysis. However, the GAPDH gene was judged to be inappropriate for use as a reference gene because gene stability in the brain, caudal fin, and gonads was evaluated to be low in all males and females. As an introductory study on silvertip tetra, a new research model fish, the results of this study are expected to provide helpful information regarding sex differentiation and determination in fish.
Keywords: Silvertip tetra, RT-qPCR, Reference genes, Gene expression
Specifications Table
| Subject | Biological sciences |
| Specific subject area | Molecular Biology |
| Type of data | Table, Figure |
| How data were acquired | Data were obtained from Real-time PCR using a Thermal Cycler Dice ™ real-time PCR system for reference genes. |
| Data format | Raw, Analyzed |
| Description of data collection | The nine candidate reference genes were selected and analyzed using a program based on the geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RankAggreg algorithms in the brain and pituitary gland, gonads, and caudal fins of silvertip tetra (Hasemania nana). |
| Data source location | Institution: Department of Marine Biotechnology, Gangneung-Wonju National University City: Gangneung-si Country: Republic of Korea Latitude and longitude: 37.770748 / 128.866253 |
| Data accessibility | Repository name: BioProject Data identification number: PRJNA1017117 Direct URL to data: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1017117 |
1. Value of the Data
-
•
The silvertip tetra (Hasemania nana) is a small freshwater fish. The silvertip tetra can distinguish males and females by their body color. Therefore, the silvertip tetra has been identified as a suitable research model for sex differentiation and determination.
-
•
This study provides suitable reference genes for the brain, caudal fin, and gonadal tissues in the silvertip tetra.
-
•
It is essential to evaluate the selection of suitable reference genes according to different experimental conditions and tissue types and verify their stability through various programs such as geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and RankAggreg.
-
•
This dataset represents the initial reference gene data for the silvertip tetra and is valuable for researching sex differentiation and determination in fish.
-
•
The results of this data are expected to be useful for baseline RT-qPCR-based expression analysis in the new experimental model fish, the silvertip tetra, and other fish.
2. Data Description
The following nine genes [elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1A), ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1-like isoform x2 (ERRFI), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), integrin beta2-like (ITGB2), phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein-like isoform x3 (PICALM), 60 s ribosomal protein L5 (RPL5), 60 s ribosomal protein L7 (RPL7), tubulin beta chain (TUBB), and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A (UBE2A)] were selected as suitable reference gene. The stability of reference genes was assessed by analyzing gene expression in the brain, gonads, and caudal fin tissues of females and males in silvertip tetra. The PCR efficiencies of the nine reference genes were 93–107%, confirming that the appropriate PCR efficiency conditions for RT-qPCR analysis were met (Table 1). The nine reference genes were analyzed using various programs such as geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and RankAggreg.
Table 1.
Summary of candidate reference genes and primer sequences for RT-qPCR.
| Gene symbol | Gene description | Primer labels | Primer sequences (5′ - 3′) | PCR efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EF1A | Elongation factor 1-alpha | qHNA_EF1A1_FW1 | TGGCAAAGTGACCAAGTCTG | 96 |
| qHNA_EF1A1_RV1 | GACAATTCCCTCCTTTCCTG | |||
| ERRFl | ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1-like isoform x2 | qHNA_ERRFl1_FW1 | TCAAAGAGTCTGGCTCAGGA | 106.27 |
| qHNA_ERRFl1_RV1 | TGTTGAGGTGGCACTGTGTA | |||
| GAPDH | Glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase | qHNA_GAPDH_FW1 | TGATGCTGGTGCAGGAATTG | 93.57 |
| qHNA_GAPDH_RV1 | CATGGCACTTCAAACAGTT | |||
| ITGB2 | Integrin beta2 like | qHNA_ITGB2_FW1 | GCTGTGGCTTTGATTGGACT | 102.53 |
| qHNA_ITGB2_RV1 | GTTCCATCGGTGCTTTAGGA | |||
| PICALM | Phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein-like isoform x3 | qHNA_PICALM_FW1 | CACTATTCCAGCGCACAGTCA | 100.08 |
| qHNA_PICALM_RV1 | TTTGGACTGCCAGTTAGAGC | |||
| RPL5 | 60s ribosomal protein L5 | qHNA_RPL5_FW1 | ACCCAGTGCACGAAAAGAAG | 100.46 |
| qHNA_RPL5_RV1 | TAATGCGGGCAAGAAGAGTC | |||
| RPL7 | 60s ribosomal protein L7 | qHNA_RPL7_FW1 | AACCGTGAGGACCAGATCAA | 98.53 |
| qHNA_RPL7_RV1 | TTTCTGGCCACTAGGTGGAA | |||
| TUBB | Tubulin beta chain | qHNA_TUBB_FW1 | AGTGGATCCCAAACAACGTC | 104.28 |
| qHNA_TUBB_RV1 | TGTGAACTCCATCTCGTCCA | |||
| UBE2A | Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A | qHNA_UBE2A_FW1 | GATGAACCGAACCCAAACAG | 95 |
| qHNA_UBE2A_RV1 | GAGTTTGAACATTGCCTGGC |
2.1. The stability of candidate reference gene by geNorm
The results of the ranking order determined using geNorm program were presented in Fig. 1. The most suitable reference genes in the brain tissue of the silvertip tetra were presented in Fig. 1A. In B and C, we presented the results for the candidate reference genes in the caudal fin and gonad, respectively. When we evaluated the overall expression stability by integrating the Ct values of the brain, gonad, and caudal fin, ITGB2, and PICALM were the most stable genes in females, while GAPDH was the least stable. UBE2A and ITGB2 were the most stable in males, while TUBB was the least stable. Considering both sexes, ITGB2 and PICALM had the highest expression stability, while GAPDH had the lowest (Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1.
Mean expression stability values (M) and ranking orders of candidate reference genes using geNorm. A lower value of average expression stability (M) indicates a more stable expression. The samples are (A) brain, (B) caudal fin, (C) gonads and (D) three tissue types.
2.2. The stability of candidate reference gene by normfinder
The results of the candidate reference gene using NormFinder program were presented Fig. 2. The ranking orders in the brain, caudal fin, and gonad of the silvertip tetra through NormFinder were presented in Fig. 2A, B, and C, respectively. In Fig. 2D, UBE2A had the highest expression stability, and GAPDH had the lowest. In males, UBE2A and ITGB2 were the most stable genes, while TUBB was the least stable gene. Across all male and female data, UBE2A was the most stable gene and GAPDH was the least stable.
Fig. 2.
Expression stability of candidate reference genes calculated by NormFinder. A lower value indicates a more stable expression. The samples are (A) brain, (B) caudal fin, (C gonads, and (D three tissue types.
2.3. The stability of candidate reference gene by bestkeeper
The most stable reference gene and unstable gene in the brain, caudal fin, and gonad of the silvertip tetra were represented in Fig. 3A, B, and C. The combined brain, gonad, and caudal fin tissue data for both males and females were presented in Fig. 3D. TUBB genes were found to be most stable in females, while GAPDH was found to be least stable. ITGB2 was found to be most stable in males, while TUBB was found to be least stable. Across all male and female data, the PICALM gene showed the highest expression stability, while the GAPDH gene showed the lowest.
Fig. 3.
Expression stability of candidate reference genes calculated by BestKeeper. A lower value indicates more stable expression. The samples refer to (A) brain, (B) caudal fin, (C) gonads, and (D) three tissue types.
2.4. The stability of candidate reference gene by RankAggreg
Ranking the expression stability based on the geometric mean of the target genes in the brain showed that RPL5 was the most stable gene in females and TUBB in males, and TUBB was the most stable gene in the mixed male-female sample (Table 2). In Fig. 4A, the least stable gene in the combined male and female data was GAPDH. In the caudal fin, the most stable genes were RPL5 in females, TUBB in males, and ITGB2 in all male and female data. In contrast, the least stable genes were UBE2A in females, RPL7 in males, and GAPDH in mixed samples (Fig. 4B). In the gonads, the most stable genes were EF1A and ITGB2 in females and males, respectively, and RPL5 in the combined male and female data. On the other hand, the least stable genes were RPL7 in females, PICALM in males, and GAPDH in mixed samples (Fig. 4C). When all three tissues were analyzed, the PICALM gene showed the highest expression stability in males, while the GAPDH gene showed the highest expression stability in females (Fig. 4D)
Table 2.
Ranking of nine candidate reference genes using geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RankAggreg programs. The lower ranking values indicate the most stable gene.
| Ranking order | geNorm |
NormFinder |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F (♀) | M (♂) | F (♀) & M (♂) | F (♀) | M (♂) | F (♀) & M (♂) | |
| 1 | ITGB2 | UBE2A | ITGB2 | UBE2A | UBE2A | UBE2A |
| 2 | PICALM | ITGB2 | PICALM | RPL7 | ITGB2 | PICALM |
| 3 | EF1A | PICALM | EF1A | RPL5 | PICALM | ERRFI |
| 4 | ERRFI | EF1A | ERRFI | PICALM | ERRFI | RPL5 |
| 5 | RPL7 | ERRFI | UBE2A | ERRFI | EF1A | ITGB2 |
| 6 | TUBB | RPL5 | RPL5 | TUBB | RPL5 | EF1A |
| 7 | UBE2A | GAPDH | RPL7 | ITGB2 | GAPDH | RPL7 |
| 8 | RPL5 | RPL7 | TUBB | EF1A | RPL7 | TUBB |
| 9 | GAPDH | TUBB | GAPDH | GAPDH | TUBB | GAPDH |
| Ranking order | BestKeeper |
RankAggreg |
||||
| F (♀) | M (♂) | F (♀) & M (♂) |
F (♀) | M (♂) | F (♀) & M (♂) |
|
| 1 | TUBB | ITGB2 | PICALM | PICALM | ITGB2 | PICALM |
| 2 | PICALM | ERRFI | UBE2A | UBE2A | UBE2A | UBE2A |
| 3 | UBE2A | UBE2A | ITGB2 | RPL7 | PICALM | ITGB2 |
| 4 | ITGB2 | PICALM | ERRFI | ITGB2 | ERRFI | ERRFI |
| 5 | ERRFI | EF1A | RPL5 | TUBB | ER1A | EF1A |
| 6 | RPL7 | RPL5 | EF1A | ERRFI | RPL5 | RPL5 |
| 7 | RPL5 | GAPDH | TUBB | RPL5 | GAPDH | RPL7 |
| 8 | EF1A | RPL7 | RPL7 | EF1A | RPL7 | TUBB |
| 9 | GAPDH | TUBB | GAPDH | GAPDH | TUBB | GAPDH |
Fig. 4.
Expression stability of candidate reference genes calculated by RankAggreg. A lower value indicates more stable expression. The samples refer to (A) brain, (B) caudal fin, (C) gonads, and (D) three tissue types.
3. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods
3.1. Fish and sample collection
The silvertip tetra (Hasemania nana) used in the experiment was purchased from a local aquarium (Busan, Korea). Fish were bred in the laboratory and used as parents (F0), and F1 individuals were produced by the natural spawning method and used in the experiment. The water temperature in the aquarium (25.7 cm × 40 cm × 28.3 cm; W × D × H) was maintained at 24 ± 1.0 °C, and the fish were kept in a circulating filtration system. Fish were anesthetized using clove oil (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 200 ppm before dissection. Brain (including pituitary gland), caudal fin, and gonad tissues from five male and female fish were harvested by anatomical techniques and stored in an ultra-low temperature freezer (−80°C) until RNA isolation.
3.2. Selection of candidate reference genes and primer design
The sequence information of the nine reference gene candidates was collected from the de-novo assembly of whole-transcriptome RNA-seq of the silvertip tetra performed in the laboratory (SRX21774992, SRX21774993, SRX21774994, SRX21774995, SRX21774996, SRX21774997). The selected genes were EF1A, ERRFI, GAPDH, ITGB2, PICALM, RPL5, RPL7, TUBB, and UBE2A, and primers for RT-qPCR were constructed based on each gene sequence. Primers for each gene were designed using Primer3Plus software (https://primer3plus.com/cgi-bin/dev/primer3plus.cgi). PCR efficiency was performed by synthesizing based on primer length (20 bp), GC content (50%), and amplification products of 150–200 bp length. PCR efficiency values (E) were evaluated using silvertip tetra adult brain, caudal fin, and gonad cDNA templates and QuantStudioTM Real-time PCR software v1.3. The slope of the standard curve determined the PCR efficiency according to the formula D=[10(−1/slope)−1] × 100% (Table 1).
3.3. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from brain, caudal fin and gonad tissues of male and female silvertip tetra using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). Total RNA was further purified using Ribospin II kit (Geneall, Korea). The experiments were also performed with DNase I treatment to remove contamination of genomic DNA. An Epoch microplate spectrophotometer (BioTeck, USA) was used to confirm that the absorbance values at 260/280 nm were within the range of 1.8–2.0. The total RNA of each sample was then calibrated to the same concentration and stored in an ultra-low temperature freezer (−80 °C). To synthesize cDNA from total RNA, reverse transcription reactions were performed using the Hyperscript RT Master Mix Kit (Geneall), oligo (dT) primers, and random hexamers according to the manufacturer's recommended method.
3.4. Real-time quantitative PCR
RT-qPCR was performed in triplicate according to the manufacturer's recommended method using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA) and PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) in a total reaction volume of 20 µl. All reactions were performed using the following settings: predenaturation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C (denaturation), 10 s at 60 °C (annealing), 72 s at 72 °C (extension).
3.5. Analysis of stability of candidate reference genes
The stability of gene expression was assessed using Ct values obtained by RT-qPCR. The programs geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper were used to evaluate gene expression stability (https://www.heartcure.com.au/reffinder/). The geNorm program is a method for calculating the stability value (M value, cutoff <1.5) of reference genes [1] and is known to calculate the gene expression stability value by pairwise mutation analysis of each reference gene with another control gene [2]. As a result, the lower the stability value (M value), the more stable the gene was selected as the gene with the highest gene expression stability. The NormFinder program is used for stability analysis based on the stability of gene expression among a group of selected reference genes [3,4], and the lower the stability value, the more appropriate reference gene was selected [5]. The BestKeeper program was used for gene stability analysis based on the standard deviation of Ct values for each gene and the gene coefficient of variation [6]. The RankAggreg analysis is. A method to analyze the stability ranking of reference genes by synthesizing the results of three programs: geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper [7].
Ethics Statement
The experimental protocol used in this study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Gangneung-Wonju National University (GWNU-2019-26). In addition, all authors who participated in the study completed the Animal Welfare & Ethics course certification by accrediting the research ethics and CITI program, research ethics and compliance training program.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Hwa Jin Lee: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Ki Tae Kim: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Min Sun Kim: Investigation, Writing – original draft. Sang Yoon Lee: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of South Korea (NRF-2021M3E5E6021114) and by a grant from National Institute of Fisheries Science (R2024029).
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Data Availability
PRJNA1017117 (Original data) (BioProject in GenBank).
References
- 1.Vandesompele J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Roy N.V., Paepe A.D., Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3:1–12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. http://genomebiology.com/2002/3/7/research/0034.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang H., Zhang X., Liu Q., Liu X., Ding S. Selection and evaluation of new reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in Epinephelus akaara based on transcriptome data. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Andersen C.L., Jensen J.L., Ørntoft T.F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004;64(15):5245–5250. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xu M., Zhang B., Su X., Zhang S., Huang M. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in populus. Anal. Biochem. 2011;408(2):337–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.08.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao Y., Gao Y., Huang B., Meng Z., Jia Y. Reference gene validation for quantification of gene expression during ovarian development of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57633-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McCulloch R.S., Ashwell M.S., O'Nan A.T., Mente P.L. Identification of stable normalization genes for quantitative real-time PCR in porcine articular cartilage. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012;3(36):1–7. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-3-36. http://www.jasbsci.com/content/3/1/36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Song H., Mao W., Duan Z., et al. Selection and validation of reference genes for measuring gene expression in Toona ciliata under different experimental conditions by quantitative real-time PCR analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02670-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
PRJNA1017117 (Original data) (BioProject in GenBank).




