Summary
Understanding a population’s fitness heterogeneity and genetic basis of thermal adaptation is essential for predicting the responses to global warming. We examined the thermotolerance and genetic adaptation of Plutella xylostella to exposure to hot temperatures. The population fitness parameters of the hot-acclimated DBM strains varied in the thermal environments. Using genome scanning and transcription profiling, we find a number of genes potentially involved in thermal adaptation of DBM. Editing two ABCG transporter genes, PxWhite and PxABCG, confirmed their role in altering cuticle permeability and influencing thermal responses. Our results demonstrate that SNP mutations in genes and changes in gene expression can allow DBM to rapidly adapt to thermal environment. ABCG transporter genes play an important role in thermal adaptation of DBM. This work improves our understanding of genetic adaptation mechanisms of insects to thermal stress and our capacity to predict the effects of rising global temperatures on ectotherms.
Subject areas: Global change, Entomology, Evolutionary biology
Graphical abstract

Highlights
-
•
DBM can rapidly adapt to thermal environment
-
•
A series of genes potentially involved in thermal adaptation of DBM
-
•
ABCG transporter genes play an important role in thermal adaptation of DBM
-
•
PxWhite and PxABCG change cuticle permeability to involve in thermal response of DBM
Global change; Entomology; Evolutionary biology
Introduction
As small ectotherms, insects are profoundly affected by variation in air temperatures, influencing their survival, distribution, and population dynamics.1,2 Ongoing global warming is predicted to increase mean temperatures and the frequency of heat waves.3 Climate change has already had significant biological impacts on insects, including affecting physiological, behavioral, and life history traits, shifting distribution and phenology and altering population dynamics and changing biotic interactions.2,4,5 The susceptibility of insects to extreme temperature events is largely determined by degree of thermotolerance and temperature acclimation.5,6,7,8 In response to increasing environmental temperature, species may adapt with greater basal thermal tolerance (genetic/evolutionary responses), greater induced thermal tolerance (plastic response), and more efficient thermoregulation behavior.9
In the face of global climate change, understanding the genetic adaptability of species is key to predicting their future distribution and impacts. By studying the genes involved in regulating the expression of thermotolerant phenotypes and the genes that harbor allelic variation that contributes to differences in thermal plasticity, researchers can identify the genetic basis of thermal adaptation that allows organisms to adapt to different temperatures.10 For example, when Drosophila simulans is exposed to high temperatures for 60 generations, the metabolic systems are modified to adapt to the new thermal environment.11
Currently, transcriptomic approaches are used to study environmental effects on gene expression.12,13 Although transcriptomics can provide valuable insights, differences in gene expression have not been able to provide direct evidence for adaptive evolution in organisms.10 Changes in allele frequency within a population should provide the raw material for selection to drive adaptive evolution.10,14 Several genes, particularly heat shock proteins, have been implicated in thermal tolerance mechanisms.12,15,16 Notably, a more robust HSP response in Drosophila melanogaster compared to Drosophila subobscura contributes significantly to the enhanced heat tolerance of D. melanogaster.16 Various strains of D. melanogaster have been the subject of genomic studies to investigate thermal adaptation, thermal plasticity, and thermal tolerance.17 This previous work provides a platform for investigating similar phenomena in other insect species.
The diamondback moth (DBM, Plutella xylostella) is a major pest of cruciferous vegetables and wild plants. Previous studies have shown that the diamondback moth exhibits significant genetic plasticity and high levels of genomic variation, allowing it to adapt rapidly to different environments.18 In previous work, we have provided evidence for the genetic basis of climatic adaptation and predicted that most DBM populations have a high tolerance to future climates.19 Previous analyses were based on genomic data from field DBM populations collected from tens of sites across the world. Tracking evolutionary changes in a laboratory setting is a better approach to define the genotype-phenotype relationship.11,20,21,22,23 Integrated analysis of genome resequencing data and gene expression profiling can reveal allelic variation, mutations, and their effects on the regulation of gene expression.20,21,22 Therefore, in our study, we used this approach to study the genetic adaptation of DBM to thermal stress.
In the present work, life history traits (lifespan and fecundity) were measured in hot-evolved and control populations of DBM. Transcriptomic and genomic approaches were used to identify the genes harboring allelic variants and changes in expression involved in thermal adaptation. Further, CRISPR/Cas 9 was used to study the function of two ABCG genes in thermal adaptation.
Results
Population fitness of hot-evolved and control strains
The control strain of DBM was maintained on the constant favorable temperature of 26°C. The control strain of DBM (CS) was kept under the elevated temperatures of 27°C for 12 h (dark) and 32°C for 12 h (light) as hot-evolved strain (HS) for one year. The duration of the preadult stage for all generations of the HS strain was significantly shorter than that of the CS strain (p < 0.001). The preadult duration of HS30 (CS under elevated environment for 30 generations) was significantly longer than that of HS1 (p = 0.003), HS5 (CS under elevated environment for 5 generations) (p < 0.001) and HS10 (CS under elevated environment for 10 generations) (p = 0.010). The longevity of females did not differ between strains for any generation. The total longevity of CS (15.9 ± 0.1 d) was significantly longer than that of HS for all generations (HS1: 13.4 ± 0.1 d; HS5: 13.2 ± 0.1 d; HS10: 13.5 ± 0.1 d; HS20: 13.5 ± 0.1 d; HS30: 13.6 ± 0.1 d) (p < 0.001) (Table S1).
The age-stage survival rate (sxj) represents the probability of a newborn individual surviving to age x and stage j. The survival rate of HS10, HS20 (CS under elevated environment for 20 generations) and HS30 was 0.822 ± 0.001, 0.856 ± 0.037 and 0.844 ± 0.038, respectively, and significantly higher than that of CS, HS1 and HS5 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Age-stage specific survival rate (Sxj) of the control strain (CS) and hot-evolved strain (HS) of P. xylostella
CS (A) represents DBM kept under favorable temperature; and HS1(B), HS5 (C), HS10 (D), HS20 (E) and HS30 (F) represent the 1st, 5th,10th, 20th, 30th generations of DBM kept under high temperature.
The age-stage specific life expectancy (exj) is the total time that an individual of age x and stage j is expected to survive. The life expectancy of HS1 and HS5 was lower than that of CS. There was no significant difference in this parameter (exj) between other generations of HS and CS (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Age-stage specific life expectancy (exj) of control strain (CS) and hot-evolved strain (HS) of P. xylostella
CS (A) represents DBM kept under favorable temperature; and HS1 (B), HS5 (C), HS10 (D), HS20 (E), and HS30 (F) represent the 1st, 5th,10th, 20th, 30th generations of DBM kept under high temperature.
Population fitness parameters include intrinsic rate of increase (r), net reproductive rate (R0), finite rate of increase (λ), and mean generation time (T). The r values of HS10, HS20 and HS30 were significantly higher than that of CS (HS10: p = 0.002; HS20: p < 0.001; HS30: p = 0.007). Only for HS1 was the R0 value significantly lower than those of CS (HS1: p = 0.024). The T values for different generations of HS were all significantly lower than that of CS (HS1: p < 0.001; HS5: p = 0.005; HS10: p < 0.001; HS20: p < 0.001; HS30: p < 0.001). Except for HS1, the λ values of other generations of HS were all higher than that of CS (HS5: p = 0.049; HS10: p = 0.002; HS20: p < 0.001; HS30: p = 0.006) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Population fitness parameters of control strain (CS) and hot-evolved strain (HS) of P. xylostella
| Parameter | CS | HS1 | HS5 | HS10 | HS20 | HS30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r (d−1) | 0.27 ± 0.01c | 0.28 ± 0.01bc | 0.30 ± 0.01abc | 0.32 ± 0.01ab | 0.33 ± 0.01a | 0.31 ± 0.01a |
| R0 | 74.92 ± 10.90ab | 45.43 ± 7.03c | 53.02 ± 7.73b | 70.30 ± 9.00ab | 83.32 ± 10.06a | 83.32 ± 10.06ab |
| T (d) | 15.9 ± 0.1a | 13.4 ± 0.1b | 13.2 ± 0.1c | 13.5 ± 0.1b | 13.5 ± 0.1b | 13.6 ± 0.1b |
| λ (d−1) | 1.31 ± 0.01c | 1.33 ± 0.02bc | 1.35 ± 0.02ab | 1.37 ± 0.01a | 1.39 ± 0.01a | 1.37 ± 0.01ab |
CS represents DBM kept under favorable temperature; and HS5, HS10, HS20 and HS30 represent the 1st, 5th,10th, 20th, 30th generations of DBM kept under high temperature. Different letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05).
Responses of HS to high temperatures
The survival rate of CS and HS under high temperatures (39°C, 40°C, 41°C, 42°C, 43°C and 44°C) for 2 h was calculated, respectively. The results showed that both temperature and strain were the critical factors that affecting the survival rate of DBM at extremely high temperatures (Table S2). Compared with CS, the survival rate of HS was significantly increased under high temperatures (39°C, 40°C, 41°C, 42°C, 43°C and 44°C) (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Effect of extremely high temperature on the P. xylostella survival rates of CS and HS
Survival rates of P. xylostella are presented for females (A) and males (B) after exposure to high temperatures. CS represents DBM kept under favorable temperature; and HS represents DBM kept under high temperature. Survival rates are represented as mean ± SE. Twenty individuals were used for each replicate, with four replicates in each treatment. The curves were generated from the equation log[p/(1-p)] = a + b T, where T is temperature (°C).
Molecular phenotypes of HS and CS
The transcriptomes of hot-evolved populations (the 33rd generation of HS, HS33) and CS were compared. Of 20,694 genes with reliable expression signals in the two strains, 7,174 were differentially expressed between HS and CS. Of these, 3,414 were up- and 3,760 were downregulated.
Contrasting CS to HS, we identified a significant enrichment in several Gene Ontology (GO) categories and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Genes downregulated in HS were enriched for more GO categories than upregulated genes enriched. Upregulated genes exhibited enrichment for several functional categories, including DNA integration, structural constituent of cuticle, cation transport and ion transport (Figure 4A). These genes were also significantly enriched in numerous KEGG signaling pathways, including AMPK, insulin, neurotrophin, PI3K-Aktc and FoxO, as well as other pathways related to oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism (Figure 5A). Downregulated genes were enriched for a large number of functions and pathways, such as ribosome and spliceosome (Figures 4B and 5B).
Figure 4.
GO ontology classification of DEGs with up- and downregulated patterns
(A) GO enrichment analysis of DEGs with upregulated profiles; and (B) GO enrichment analysis of DEGs with downregulated profiles.
Figure 5.
KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs with up- and downregulated patterns
(A) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs with upregulated profiles; and (B) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs with downregulated profiles.
Identification of candidate genes
To identify the candidate genes that underlie population differentiation, we estimated pairwise FST, π and allele frequency differentiation for all polymorphic SNPs. We identified 13,356 SNPs whose FST values fell into the top 5% of the FST distribution (FST > 0.178); and 14,105 SNPs whose π values fell into the top 5% of the distribution (π > 2.378). In total, 2,156 SNPs were distributed in 445 genes, whose FST and π values were both in the top 5%. Then, we identified 47,306 SNPs whose allele frequency between CS and HS fell into the top 1% of the distribution (>0.515). Among them, 19,693 SNPs were distributed in 461 genes, whose -log10 (p-value) were >10 (Figure 6). Eventually, 82 genes involved the SNPs that fitted all the above conditions.
Figure 6.
Distribution of㏑ratio (θπ, CS/θπ, HS) and FST
Red dots represent windows fitting the selected regions requirement (corresponding to ratio (θπ, CS/θπ, HS) > 0.866, FST > 0.178).
Considering the genes with population differentiation and different expressions between CS and HS, we defined 27 genes as candidates selected by high temperature, which included 3 ABCG transporter proteins (Px008370, Px008371 and Px012058), mannose transferase (Px003963), trehalose transporter (Px007098) and rhodopsin (Px008529) (Table S3).
SNP mutation and gene expression variation
We sequenced PxWhite and PxABCG in HS to confirm the mutant SNPs in these candidate genes. We found that 77 SNPs in PxWhite of HS were high-frequency mutations, among which, the mutation rates of 44 SNPs were 100% (Figure 7A). Fifty SNPs in PxABCG of HS were identified to be high-frequency mutation (Figure 7B).
Figure 7.
The mutant SNPs of PxWhite and PxABCG in CS and HS DBM
(A) The allele frequency of mutant SNPs of PxWhite; and (B) The allele frequency of mutant SNPs of PxABCG. pos indicates position of SNPs in gene. CS represents DBM kept under favorable temperature; and HS represents DBM kept under high temperature. The colors represent: black: G base; blue: C base; red: T base; green: A base.
To verify the function of PxWhite and PxABCG in mediating adaptation of DBM to extreme temperature, we performed RT-qPCR to profile the gene expression under different temperature regimes using the wild-type strain (WT/CS). At 40°C, 4°C, and −17°C, the expression of PxWhite in females was significantly lower than that under 26°C (40°C: t = 10.973, df = 4, p < 0.001; 4°C: t = 10.142, df = 4, p = 0.001; −17°C: t = 9.945, df = 4, p = 0.001). Only at 4°C, PxWhite expression of males significantly lower than that at 26°C (t = 3.128, df = 4, p = 0.035). At 40°C, PxABCG expression in females was significantly higher than that at 26°C (t = −3.492, df = 4, p = 0.025) (Figure 8).
Figure 8.
Effect of extreme temperatures on the relative expression level of the PxWhite and PxABCG genes in the wild-type DBM strain (WT)
(A) Expression level of PxWhite in females.
(B) Expression level of PxWhite in males.
(C) Expression level of PxABCG in females.
(D) Expression level of PxABCG in males. Temperature treatments included two high-temperatures treatments: (1) 40°C for 30 min, (2) 43°C for 30 min; and two low-temperature treatments: (1) 4°C for 30 min, and (2) −17°C for 30 min. Expression of PxWhite/PxABCG at 26°C was arranged as control with a relative expression value = 1. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Expression of PxWhite/PxABCG in each treatment was statistically compared with control using independent t-test. ∗ denotes significant difference between control and each of the treatments (t-test, p < 0.05).
Functional validation of ABCG transporter genes
Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, we successfully knocked out PxWhite and PxABCG in the WT. A mixture of Cas9 protein and sgRNA of PxWhite or PxABCG was injected into 216 and 214 eggs, respectively. Among these, 10 and 25 eggs successfully matured to adulthood, respectively. Having been individually crossed with WT, we confirmed site-specific mutagenesis in 30% (3/10) and 24% (6/25) of G0 moths, respectively. After mutation screening, one homozygous mutant strain with a 1-bp insertion in PxWhite exon 3 and one homozygous mutant strain with a 4-bp deletion in PxABCG exon 4 were generated (Figure 9).
Figure 9.
Mutagenesis of PxWhite and PxACBG induced by CRISPR/Cas9
Representative sequencing trace of the PCR fragment from mutated G0 adults with multi-peaks at the cleavage site and representative sequence of the diverse indel mutations flanking the sgRNA target sites of PxWhite (A) and PxABCG (B) in the G0 individuals. (A) The base in the dotted box denotes the insertion mutation kept establishing the PxWhite mutant strain. (B) The dotted line denotes the deletion mutation kept establishing the PxABCG mutant strain.
We examined the difference in the percentage of larvae that could develop into pupae after heat shock between the strain of the wild-type and the PxWhite mutant or PxABCG mutant. At 42°C or 43°C for 2h, we found that fewer fourth instar larvae of the PxWhite-MU and PxABCG-MU strains developed into pupae than those of CS (Figure 10A). We then examined the difference in survival rate between the CS, PxWhite-MU, and PxABCG-MU adults under high temperatures (40°C, 41°C, 42°C and 43°C). Compared with CS, survival of the PxWhite-MU and PxABCG-MU were significantly reduced under high temperatures (Tables S4 and S5; Figures 10B and 10C).
Figure 10.
Effect of extremely high temperature on survival rates of the wild-type, PxWhite-deficient and PxABCG-deficient diamondback moth
(A) The percentage of fourth-instar larvae of DBM developed into pupae after exposure to high temperatures. Survival rates of DBM are presented for females (B) and males (C) after exposure to high temperatures. Survival rates are represented as mean ± SE. Twenty individuals were used for each replicate, with four replicates in each treatment. The curves were generated from the equation: log[p/(1-p)] = a + b T where T is temperature (°C). The significant test was in the Tables S4 and S5.
To assess the impact of PxABCG and PxWhite mutations on cuticle permeability, we employed Eosin Y staining. The resulting image (Figure 11) provides a clear visual representation of the differential permeability patterns. In wild-type (WT) larvae, most body surfaces were impermeable to Eosin Y, with staining restricted to the head, the third abdominal leg, and the fifth anal leg. In contrast, larvae of both mutant strains exhibited a compromised surface barrier, allowing Eosin Y to penetrate the entire body, as evidenced by the extensive staining observed in PxWhite-MU and PxABCG-MU larvae (Figure 11).
Figure 11.
The larvae of WT, PxABG-MU and PxWhite-MU were stained with Eosin Y
Discussion
Temperature is a major factor influencing the behavior, physiology, and genetics of ectotherms. Our experimental DBM populations, pre-adapted to elevated temperature, showed highly significant differences in gene expression and SNP mutants. A number of genes were identified that are involved in the thermal adaptation of this global pest. Using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, two ABCG genes were shown to be involved in the adaptation of DBM to elevated temperatures.
The fitness parameters of DBM under thermal stress were monitored for 30 generations and the intrinsic rate of increase recovered after five generations and was not significantly lower than that of the control strain. The finite rate of increase (λ) of HS was higher than that of CS. After 10 generations of acclimation under thermal environment, the net reproductive rate (R0) was obviously increased. Our observations indicate that DBM in fitness are able to adapt to substantially higher temperatures within 5–10 generations. In addition, heat-adapted DBM have a higher thermal tolerance than the control DBM.
We then combined transcriptomic and genomic approaches to explore the genetic adaptation of DBM to the thermal environment. After 33 generations of high temperature acclimation, the DBM populations displayed highly significant differences in gene expression. Most previous studies of thermal plasticity in insects have focused on short-term heat shock, corresponding to a short exposure to high temperature for tens of minutes or hours.24,25,26 However, the genetic adaptation in nature usually takes a relatively long time. Studies of long-term acclimation have mainly focused on the model organism D. melanogaster, with several cases of environmental temperature affecting gene expression profiles11 and protein profiles.27,28 Mallard et al.11 show that the metabolism of D. melanogaster is rewritten after 60 generations in a hot environment, involving two key genes, Sestrin and SNF4Ay, implicating AMPK. Here, we also found that the AMPK signaling pathway was enriched in upregulated genes in hot-evolved populations.
In the present study, we focused on the change in gene expression resulting from the genetic change. Therefore, a common garden experiment was performed to determine the change in gene expression between CS and HS. We then combined the transcriptomic and genomic data to identify the genes that changed at both RNA and DNA levels. Twenty-seven genes were identified as being involved in the thermal adaptation of DBM. These genes are predicted to cover a wide range of functions. Among them, some genes were previously documented with regulating the response of species to temperature. For example, the long-chain fatty acid-CoA ligase 1 (Px017708) was involved in catalyzing the conversion of long-chain fatty acids to active acyl-CoA and synthesis of cellular lipids, which plays an important role in the response of animals to cold.29,30 Trehalose transporter (Px007098) was responsible for releasing of trehalose from the insect’s fat body into the hemolymph and transferring it to other tissues to balance the trehalose content in the hemolymph.31 Trehalose could help insects resist temperature stress.32,33,34 The expression of trehalose transporter in Anopheles gambiae is upregulated at high temperatures and after RNAi of this gene, the thermal tolerance of A. gambiae is reduced.33
Three of the previously documented genes were members of the ABC transporter subfamily G (http://59.79.254.1/DBM/index.php). In our study, we have only confirmed the functions of two ABCG transporter genes (Px008371/PxWhite and Px012058/PxABCG), as we could not establish the strain of the Px008370 mutant. The gene expressions of PxWhite and PxABCG under high temperature (40°C) were significantly different from that under favorable temperature for DBM (26°C). Furthermore, the SNP mutation of these two genes was higher in the hot-evolved populations. We then used the CRISPR/Cas 9 technique to generate PxWhite knockout and PxABCG knockout DBM strains. The thermal tolerance of DBM was reduced after PxWhite and PxABCG knockout. In Drosophila, the white gene is involved in the vesicular transepithelial transport of guanosine 3′-5′ cyclic monophosphate, which indirectly affects the lipid transport.35 The white gene mutants in D. melanogaster have defects in olfactory learning and cholesterol homeostasis, potentially due to alterations in lipid composition and/or distribution.36 TcABCG-4C of Tribolium castaneum acts as a transporter of cuticular lipids deposited in the outer epicuticular layer to prevent water loss.37 The epicuticular lipid layer of insects plays a fundamental role in insect fitness and acts as a selective barrier against water loss, thus preventing lethal desiccation.38,39,40,41 However, under extremely high temperatures, water loss is an important cause of insect death.42 In our study, we also speculated that PxWhite and PxABCG might be involved in thermal adaptation by altering the cuticle permeability of DBM. Therefore, we used Eosin Y staining to verify that PxWhite and PxABCG mutants improved the cuticle permeability of DBM, which could maintain the water balance of insect body. Further research is needed to explore how PxWhite and PxABCG to alter the cuticle permeability of DBM.
This is the first report suggesting that ABCG subfamily genes are involved in thermal tolerance and adaptation of insects. Currently, studies on the ABCG transporter of DBM are related to eye color and Bt resistance. The white gene is required for normal eye pigmentation in many insects,43,44 including DBM. In our study, we observed the white-eyed DBM in the PxWhite mutant strain. PxWhite is also involved in Cry1Ac resistance in DBM.45 Several ABCG transporters have been shown to be involved in lipid transport and cholesterol homeostasis.46,47,48,49
The absence of overlap between the candidate genes identified in this study and those from our previous landscape genomics analysis of DBM’s genomic variation and climate variables19 can be attributed to the distinct selection pressures experienced by the respective populations. In the previous study, DBM samples were collected from the wild, where they were subjected to a multitude of environmental factors, while the laboratory-developed population in the current study was exposed solely to temperature-based selection. This difference in selective environments likely accounts for the divergent sets of candidate genes identified in the two studies.
Limitations of the study
Rapid phenotypic evolution is common in nature and observed in evolution experiments. It can be attributed to either subtle frequency changes in genetic polymorphisms across many loci50,51,52 or to a few loci or genes with large effects.53 In our laboratory evolution, we observed extensive frequency changes in genetic variants, suggesting that both polygenic and oligogenic factors may have driven rapid evolution. Further functional verification of the candidate genes identified in our study will provide more critical information insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying rapid evolution. Allelic replacement using CRISPR/Cas9 technology enables the investigation of the relationship between SNP mutations and thermal adaptation. Thus, further work is needed to understand the role of SNP mutations in candidate genes in the adaptation of DBM to the thermal environment.
Conclusions
In the face of global warming, it is important to understand how insect pests respond and adapt to increased temperatures in order to predict future risks and identify potential, novel targets for insecticidal or genetic control. We integrated analysis of changes in SNP and gene expression levels in laboratory-evolved populations to identify the genes involved in the thermal adaptation of DBM. PxWhite and PxABCG regulated DBM susceptibility to high temperature by altering cuticle permeability. This suggests that ABCG transporter genes play an important role in the thermal adaptation of DBM and potentially other insect pests for which new control methods are needed to combat insecticide resistance and prevent crop losses.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit | Qiagen | Cat#69504 |
| Eastep® Super Total RNA Extraction kit | Promega | Cat#LS1040 |
| GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System | Promega | Cat#A5001 |
| Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | Vazyme | Cat#P505-d1 |
| Gel Extraction Kit | Omega | Cat#D2500-01 |
| SYBR Green Supermix | Promega | Cat#A6001 |
| HiScribe™ T7 Quick High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit | New England Biolabs | Cat#E2040S |
| TiANamp Genomic DNA Kit | TIANGEN | Cat#DP304-02 |
| 0.5% Eosin Y | Scientific Phygene | Cat#PH0720 |
| Deposited data | ||
| Whole genome resequencing data | This paper | CRA014483, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa |
| Transcriptome data | This paper | CRA014495,https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa |
| Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
| WT/CS | Storage in lab | N/A |
| HS | Storage in lab | N/A |
| Pxwhite-MU | Storage in lab | N/A |
| PxABCG-MU | Storage in lab | N/A |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| Primer for PCR in SNP mutant detecting: PxWhite: forward: ATGACGGCGGGAAATGAGGAGCAGGAGC; reverse: TTATTTCGCCCTGCGCGTCCTCAGGACCAG | This paper | N/A |
| Primer for PCR in SNP mutant detecting: PxABCG: forward: AGTGCGTCGTGCTATAGTGGG; reverse: AGTGCGTCGTGCTATAGTGGG | This paper | N/A |
| Primer for RT-qPCR: PxWhite: forward: AGAAGTCATATCGGAGTTG; reverse: GTATAACATTCTGTGCCATAA | This paper | N/A |
| Primer for RT-qPCR: PxABCG: forward: CAAGTTGGGTAGTGAGCTCGG; reverse: ATGGAGAGCCGCTTGTACTGC | This paper | N/A |
| Primer for obtaining the templates for in vitro transcription of the sgRNAs: PxWhite: forward:TAATA CGACTCACTATAGGTCAGCGAGTTGAGGAGTGG TTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAA |
This paper | N/A |
| Primer for obtaining the templates for in vitro transcription of the sgRNAs: PxABCG: TAATACGACTCACTATAGGAGCATCGC GACACTCGCTCGGTTTTAGAGCTAGA AATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCC |
This paper | N/A |
| Primer for obtaining the templates for in vitro transcription of the sgRNAs: reverse: AAAA GCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTT GATAACGGACTAGCCTTATTTTAACTTGC TATTTCTAGCTCTAAAA |
This paper | N/A |
| Primer for PCR in base insertion or deletion after genome editing: PxWhite: forward: CAAA CCCTTCACACCGACATT; reverse: CAATGAA CAGGTCCTGTTGTTG |
This paper | N/A |
| Primer for PCR in base insertion or deletion after genome editing: PxABCG: forward:ACTTTATCC AAGCAAACCTCAGT; reverse: ACGCCAACGT AGTCACTTTTA |
This paper | N/A |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| TWOSEX-MSChar | Chi et al.54 | http://140.120.197.173/Ecology/Download/Twosex-MSChart-exe-B100000.rar |
| SOAPnuke1.5.6 | Chen et al.55 | https://github.com/BGI-flexlab/SOAPnuke |
| Burrows-Wheeler Aligner BWA | Li and Durbin56 | https://maq.sourceforge.net/ |
| SAMtools | Li et al.57 | https://maq.sourceforge.net/ |
| RepeatMasker | www.repeatmasker.org | |
| PoPoolation 1 | Kofler et al.58 | http://code.google.com/p/popoolation/ |
| PoPoolation2 | Kofler et al.59 | http://code.google.com/p/popoolation2/ |
| Bowtie2 v2.2.5 | Langmead and Salzberg60 | http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml |
| RSEM | Li and Dewey61 | https://github.com/deweylab/RSEM/archive/v1.3.1.tar.gz |
| DESeq2 | Love et al.62 | http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html. |
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Yanting Chen (fafucyt@126.com).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Data and code availability
-
•
The source data is available as listed in the key resources table.
-
•
No original code was generated for this paper.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
Experimental model and study participant details
Insect
The control strain of DBM, WT/CS, was obtained from the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing) in 2012. Since then, it has been maintained on artificial diet at a constant favorable temperature of 26°C in a climate incubator (DRX-400-DG, Ningbo Saifu Experimental Instrument CO., LTD, China). Approximately 1,000 control strain individuals were then kept under the elevated temperatures of 27°C for 12 h (dark) and 32°C for 12 h (light) in a climate incubator. The elevated temperature regimes utilized in this study were based on a study by Liu et al. that investigated the relationship between temperature and developmental rate in DBM, demonstrating their ability to survive and develop at temperatures of a maximum of 32°C.63 Five replicate and independent hot-evolved populations were created. These hot-evolved populations were originally from a favorable-temperature (26°C) population, which are genetically homogenous and maintained under the same temperature condition of 32°C for one year. They were therefore taken to be a single strain or and termed as the hot-evolved strain (HS).
Method details
Fitness parameters
The life tables of CS strain and the 1st, 5th, 10th, 20th and 30th generations of HS strain were established for investigating and comparing their development times, rates of survival, and rates of reproduction when maintained under favorable and high temperature conditions. Thirty newly laid eggs (< 12 h old) were placed in plastic Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) with 3 replications (total 90 eggs), and then maintained under favorable and high temperature conditions. The three repeats were sampled from five hot-evolved populations. The number of larvae hatched from eggs was counted. Survival and development of each treatment was recorded every 12 h until all individuals died. The larvae were fed with artificial diet. After pupal emergence, all females and males in one repeat were transferred to plastic boxes for mating and laying eggs. Adults were provided with 10% honey. Eggs laid by females were counted every 12 h until all females died.
Life table data of CS and HS strains were analyzed using TWOSEX-MSChar.54 The age-stage specific survival rate (sxj), age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx), age-stage specific life expectancy (exj) and age-stage specific reproductive value (vxj) were calculated.64,65 The population parameters, including net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate (λ) and mean generation time (T), were also calculated. The variances and standard errors of these parameters were estimated using bootstrap technique with 100,000 times. Paired bootstrap tests were used to compare the difference between these parameters in CS and HS strains at a 5% significance level.
Responses to high temperature
Responses of CS and HS strains were tested using adults from the 56th generation. Female or male individuals emerged within 24 h were placed singly into 1.5 mL clear plastic vials (4.0 cm height) with a pinhole in the side wall for aeration. For each strain, twenty vials with females and twenty with males were then put into a plastic container (16.5 cm length, 11.5 cm width, 3.5 cm height). Four plastic containers with CS and four with HS DBM adults were placed into a climate incubator (DRX-400-DG, Ningbo Saifu Experimental Instrument CO., LTD, China) and subjected to one of the following heat shock treatments: 39°C, 40°C, 41°C, 42°C, 43°C, and 44°C, for 2 h. After each heat shock treatment, the plastic containers were removed from the climate incubator and placed in a temperature-controlled room at 26°C for 24 h, after which survival rate was recorded.
Logistic regression models were statistically fitted to the survival data to test the response of DBM to different temperatures. The results of the heat-shock experiment were numerically analyzed using the model log [p/(1−p)] = ajk + bjk T, where j is the strain (CS or HS), k is sex (male or female), and T is temperature (°C) used as a continuous predictor.
DNA sequencing, mapping, and data processing
Genomic DNA of CS and HS strain DBM was extracted for pool sequencing, respectively. The 33rd generation DBM of HS were sampled. For each population, DNA was extracted from 300 females with 10 replicates (30 females in each repeat). Two replicates were sampled for each evolved HS population (10 replicates in total). Genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, 69504). Genomic resequencing was performed with Illumina HiSeq 2000 at BGI, Shenzhen, China. Each sample was sequenced with a 10 × coverage. Sequencing libraries for each sample were constructed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. SOAPnuke1.5.6 was used to eliminate the raw reads with adapters, unknown and low-quality bases, by the following parameters: -n 0.1 -l 20 -q 0.5 -Q 2 –G.55 Trimmed sequences were mapping to the DBM reference genome using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner BWA.56 The mapping results in SAM format were converted into BAM format using SAMtools57 and filtered for a minimum mapping quality of 30. BAM files were transformed to pileup and mpileup files using SAMtools. Simple sequence repeats were identified using RepeatMasker (www.repeatmasker.org) with default sensitivity parameters but without interspersed repeats (option: -noint). Indels and 5 bp downstream and upstream every indel were identified using the script identify-genomic-indel-regions.pl from PoPoolation 1.58 Then pileup files were converted to the PoPoolation2-specific sync format using the script mpileup2sync.jar from PoPoolation 2.59 Indels and simple sequence repeats in sync files were subsequently removed using the script filter-sync-by-gtf.pl from PoPoolation 2.59
RNA sequencing and data analysis
Prior to RNA sequencing, the hot-evolved populations (the 33rd generation of HS, HS33) and CS were maintained at constant 26°C for two generations to eliminate environmental effects.11 Individual pupae were placed into 1.5 mL clear plastic vials. Female adults emerging within 6 h were sampled and frozen in liquid nitrogen. For each strain, ninety vials with females were evenly put into three 1.5 mL tubes as three repeats (each tube with 30 females). All tubes with frozen moth samples were stored at -80°C before RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using Eastep® Super Total RNA Extraction kit (LS1040, Promega, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. A NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND2000, Thermo Scientific, USA) and 2% agarose gel electrophoresis were used to determine the quality and quantity of RNA.
Transcriptome sequencing was performed with BGISEQ-500 at BGI, Shenzhen, China. mRNA libraries for each sample were constructed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Raw data with low quality, adaptor-polluted and high content (> 5%) of unknown base (N) reads were filtered using SOAPnuke1.5.6.55 Clean reads were stored in FASTQ format. HISAT was used to preform de novo assembly with clean reads of high quality to obtain transcripts. Then Bowtie2 v2.2.560 was used to perform map clean reads to reference genome. Finally, RSEM61 was used to calculate the gene expression levels of genes and transcripts. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using DESeq262 after adjustment for false-discovery rate (Q-values < 0.05). Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs were both implemented using phyper in R. The P values were adjusted by false discovery rate (FDR). The term with FDR less than 0.05 was defined as significant enrichment.
Identification of candidate genes
To identify genes likely to be differentiated, we used a two-pronged method to identify the most strongly differentiated alleles. The pairwise FST was calculated using the script fst-sliding.pl with the following parameters. The site with a read depth lower than 20 × and higher than 98% coverage were excluded from the analyses. A minor allele count of 6 was used as cutoff of SNPs to be called. To avoid increased stochastic error rates, FST was estimated for non-overlapping windows with setting window size and step size as 1000. Using the parameters described above, FST was also obtained for coding and non-coding regions. We then estimated the population parameter π to characterize genome wide patterns of variation and differentiation. Variance-sliding.pl in PoPoolation2 was used to estimate π. We assumed a minimum count of two, window size and step size of 1000 and used unbiased estimators for pooled data that corrected for pool size and coverage.59,66 Further, snp-frequence-dif.pl was used to calculate the allele frequency differentiation across all SNPs. Only those falling into the upper 5% tail of the distribution were considered to be truly differentiated. The called SNPs were eventually subjected to two-sided Fisher’s exact test (FET) using fisher-test.pl.
We defined candidate genes as those meet all the following criteria: (1) contained SNPs whose FST-value fell into the top 5% of the FST distribution; (2) contained SNPs whose π fell into the top 5% of the π distribution; (3) statistically significant allele frequency differentiation between populations with -log 10 (p-value) > 10; and (4) significantly different gene expression between CS and HS.
SNP mutant detecting
Nine females from the 44th generation of HS (HS44) were randomly selected from five independent hot-evolved populations to extract RNA. Total RNA was extracted using Eastep® Super Total RNA Extraction kit (LS1040, Promega, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and quantity of RNA were determined by a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND2000, Thermo Scientific, USA) and 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. cDNA was synthesized using GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System (A5001, Promega Corporation, USA). PCR was performed with a 25 μL total reaction mixture, including 12.5 μL 2 × reaction buffer, 0.5 μL dNTP mix, 1.0 μL of primers (PxWhite: forward: 5'-ATGACGGCGGGAAATGAGGAGCAGGAGC-3', reverse: 5'-TTATTTCGCCCTGCGCGTCCTCAGGACCAG-3'; PxABCG: forward: 5'-AGTGCGTCGTGCTATAGTGGG-3', reverse: 5'-AGTGCGTCGTGCTATAGTGGG-3'), 0.5 μL DNase, 7.5 μL nuclease-free water, and 2.0 μL cDNA, using the Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The PCR conditions were set as follow: 95°C for 5min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 15s, 70°C (PxWhite) / 61°C (PxABCG) for 15 s, 72°C for 2 min (PxWhite) / 1 min (PxABCG); and 72°C for 5min. PCR products were purified using Gel Extraction Kit (Omega, Morgan Hill, GA, USA) and then Sanger sequenced by Biosune Compony (Fuzhou, China). Snap Gene software was used to compare the sequences of PxWhite and PxABCG between CS and HS. The allele frequencies of all SNPs in PxWhite and PxABCG were calculated to detect the mutant SNP.
Gene expression analysis
We used one control with CS DBM under favorable temperature at 26°C and four with CS DBM under four different temperature treatments. For the treatments, emerged adults were individually placed in a 1.5 mL plastic vial with a pinhole in the side wall and exposed to one of the following temperature treatments: two high-temperature treatments of 40°C for 30 min (H1) and 43°C for 30 min (H2); and two low-temperature treatments 4°C for 30 min (L1) and -17°C for 30 min (L2). Each temperature treatment and control included 15 vials with females and 15 vials with males. After each treatment, the vials were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at -80°C before RNA extraction.
Total RNA was extracted, and the quality and quantity of RNA were determined. Then cDNA was synthesized with 1.0 μg of total RNA. RT-qPCR was performed using the target gene-specific primers (PxWhite: forward: 5'-AGAAGTCATATCGGAGTTG-3', reverse: 5'-GTATAACATTCTGTGCCATAA-3'; PxABCG: forward: 5'-CAAGTTGGGTAGTGAGCTCGG-3', reverse: 5'- ATGGAGAGCCGCTTGTACTGC-3'), which was designed using Oligo 7. The PxRPL32 was as reference gene for normalization. RT-qPCR was conducted with a 20 μL total reaction mixture, including 2 μL cDNA, 0.4 μL of forward and reverse primer, 0.15 μL CXR reference dye, 7.05 μL nuclease-free water and 10 μL SYBR Green Supermix (A6001, Promega Corporation, USA) using QuantStudioTM 6 Flex real-time PCR system (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). PCR conditions were set as follow: 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s and then for a melt curve: 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, 95°C for 15 s. The relative expression level of PxWhite and PxABCG in each treatment was normalized to the expression level of samples under control temperature, using 2−ΔΔCt method.67
CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
The CS was used for functional validation of PxWhite and PxABCG. We selected sgRNA target sites 5' - GGAGCATCGCGACACTCGCT - 3' in PxABCG exon 3 and 5' - GGTCAGCGAGTTGAGGAGTG - 3' in PxWhite exon 3 according to the principle of 5' - N20NGG - 3' (with the PAM sequence underlined). To obtain the templates for in vitro transcription of the sgRNAs, PCR was performed with a 50 μL total reaction mixture, including 25 μL 2 × buffer, 1.0 μL dNTP, 1.0 μL DNA polymerase, 1.5 μL of primer pairs (forward:5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGTCAGCGAGTTGAGGAGTGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAA-3' (PxWhite) / 5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGAGCATCGCGACACTCGCTCGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCC-3'(PxABCG); reverse: 5'-AAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTTGATAACGGACTAGCCTTATTTTAACTTGCTATTTCTAGCTCTAAAA-3') and 20 μL nuclease-free water. PCR conditions were set as followed: 95°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 68°C for 15 s, 72°C for 30 s, and then 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were purified using Gel Extraction Kit (Omega, Morgan Hill, GA, USA). In vitro transcription was performed to generate sgRNAs using HiScribeTM T7 Quick High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) in a 15 μL total reaction mixture, including 1.0 μL T7 RNA polymerase mix, 5.0 μL NTP buffer mix, 250 ng in vitro transcription templates of sgRNA, and added nuclease-free water to 15 μL. The reaction mixture was incubated under 37°C overnight. Then 1 μL DNase was added and incubated under 37°C for 30 min to get the sgRNA. The synthesized sgRNA was stored at -80°C for use after purification with phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation.
For CRISPR knockout, a reaction mixture of 100 ng/μL Cas9 protein (GenCrispr, Nanjing, China), 300 ng/μL sgRNA, 0.5 μL 10× reaction buffer and adding nuclease-free water to 10 μL was first prepared. The mixture was then incubated under 37°C for 20 min. Fresh eggs, laid within 15 - 20 min, from WT females were injected with this mixture using an IM 300 Microinjector (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). Microinjected eggs were then incubated at 26°C. The microinjected eggs that could successfully hatch and mature from larvae to adults were defined as G0. Newly emerged G0 adults were individually mated with control stain CST adults. After mated females laid eggs (G1), the gDNA of G0 moths were individually extracted using TiANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, China). Then PCR amplification with specific primers (PxWhite: forward: 5'-CAAACCCTTCACACCGACATT-3', reverse: 5'- CAATGAACAGGTCCTGTTGTTG-3'; PxABCG: forward:5'-ACTTTATCCAAGCAAACCTCAGT-3'; reverse: 5'-ACGCCAACGTAGTCACTTTTA-3') and sequencing were performed. The offspring of G0 with mutations were kept. The remaining G1 moths were paired individually to generate G2 progeny. When paired G1 female and male had the same allelic mutation (Aa), their offspring (G2) were preferentially kept. Three G2 lines could be generated, including no mutation (aa), mutation in single-strand DNA (Aa) and double-stranded DNA (AA). The remaining G2 moths were also paired individually to generate G3 progeny. When paired G2 female and male had the same lines (AA), their offspring (G3) were homozygous mutant, and considered to develop the homozygous mutant strain. If homozygous individuals could not be obtained in G3, mutation screening was continued to perform until obtaining the homozygous mutant strain (Pxwhite mutant strain (Pxwhite-MU) and PxABCG mutant strain (PxABCG-MU)).
Bioassay: Responses of mutant DBM to high temperatures
DBM strains used in this assay were CS, Pxwhite-MU and PxABCG-MU fourth instar larvae and adults. Twenty fourth instar larvae of CS, PxWhite-MU, and PxABCG-MU strains were put into a Petri dish (90 mm diameter). Then the Petri dishes were placed into the climate incubator where temperatures were set as 40°C, 41°C, 42°C, 43°C, and 44°C, for 2 h. Each treatment was repeated four times. After each heat shock treatment, the Petri dishes with larvae were removed from the climate incubator and placed in a temperature-controlled room at 26°C. The artificial diet was provided for the larvae. The number of larvae that could develop into pupae was recorded. The bioassay method for the adults was the same as the bioassay for responses of HS to high temperatures.
Eosin Y staining
To investigate the effect of PxABCG and PxWhite mutants on cuticle permeability, Eosin Y staining was performed on fourth instar larvae. Ten larvae were used for each strain. The larvae were put into a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 1.5 mL dye solution (0.5% Eosin Y, PH0720, Scientific Phygene) and kept under 45°C for 2 h. Then, the larvae were washed using water until no Eosin Y was on the surface. Finally, the larvae were photographed with stereomicroscope (Lycra DMi8).
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32202312, 31972271), the Hainan Major Science and Technology Project (ZDKJ202002), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Fujian Province (2022J06013), the project of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GJYS202303), the Fujian Science and Technology Project (2022L3087), the Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project (CXZX2019001G, CXZX2017206), and the Outstanding Young Scientific Research Talents Program of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (xjq201905). This work was also supported by the high-performance computing platform of YZBSTCACC.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, S.Y. and Y.C.; Methodology, S.Y., G.L., H.Z., and Y.C.; Investigation, S.Y., G.L., H.Z., J.L., S.C., J.H., and Y.C.; Writing - Original Draft: S.Y. and Y.C.; Writing – Review and Editing, S.Y., Y.C., L.V., G.M.G., and M.Y.; Visualization, G.L. and Y.C.; Supervision, Y.C. and M.Y.; Funding Acquisition, Y.C. and M.Y.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Published: February 15, 2024
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.109242.
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Harvey J.A., Heinen R., Gols R., Thakur M.P. Climate change-mediated temperature extremes and insects: From outbreaks to breakdowns. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020;26:6685–6701. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Colinet H., Sinclair B.J., Vernon P., Renault D. Insects in fluctuating thermal environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015;60:123–140. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Field C.B., Barros V.R., Dokken D.J., Mastrandrea M.D., Mach K.J. Cambridge University Press; 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. [Google Scholar]
- 4.González-Tokman D., Córdoba-Aguilar A., Dáttilo W., Lira-Noriega A., Sánchez-Guillén R.A., Villalobos F. Insect responses to heat: physiological mechanisms, evolution and ecological implications in a warming world. Biol. Rev. 2020;95:802–821. doi: 10.1111/brv.12588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huey R.B., Kearney M.R., Krockenberger A., Holtum J.A.M., Jess M., Williams S.E. Predicting organismal vulnerability to climate warming: roles of behaviour, physiology and adaptation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2012;367:1665–1679. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hoffmann A.A. Physiological climatic limits in Drosophila: patterns and implications. J. Exp. Biol. 2010;213:870–880. doi: 10.1242/jeb.037630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Somero G.N. The physiology of climate change: how potentials for acclimatization and genetic adaptation will determine 'winners' and 'losers'. J. Exp. Biol. 2010;213:912–920. doi: 10.1242/jeb.037473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sunday J.M., Bates A.E., Kearney M.R., Colwell R.K., Dulvy N.K., Longino J.T., Huey R.B. Thermal-safety margins and the necessity of thermoregulatory behavior across latitude and elevation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:5610–5615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316145111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Esperk T., Kjaersgaard A., Walters R.J., Berger D., Blanckenhorn W.U. Plastic and evolutionary responses to heat stress in a temperate dung fly: negative correlation between basal and induced heat tolerance? J. Evol. Biol. 2016;29:900–915. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lafuente E., Beldade P. Genomics of developmental plasticity in animals. Front. Genet. 2019;10:720. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mallard F., Nolte V., Tobler R., Kapun M., Schlötterer C. A simple genetic basis of adaptation to a novel thermal environment results in complex metabolic rewiring in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2018;19:119. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1503-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu Y., Su H., Li R., Li X., Xu Y., Dai X., Zhou Y., Wang H. Comparative transcriptome analysis of Glyphodes pyloalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) reveals novel insights into heat stress tolerance in insects. BMC Genom. 2017;18:974. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4355-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li H., Zhao X., Qiao H., He X., Tan J., Hao D. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the heat stress response in Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Front. Physiol. 2019;10:1568. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dewitt T.J., Scheiner S.M. Oxford University Press; 2004. Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang X.R., Wang C., Ban F.X., Zhu D.T., Liu S.S., Wang X.W. Genome-wide identification and characterization of HSP gene superfamily in whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and expression profiling analysis under temperature stress. Insect Sci. 2019;26:44–57. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sørensen J.G., Giribets M.P., Tarrío R., Rodríguez-Trelles F., Schou M.F., Loeschcke V. Expression of thermal tolerance genes in two Drosophila species with different acclimation capacities. J. Therm. Biol. 2019;84:200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rodrigues Y.K., Beldade P. Thermal plasticity in insects’ response to climate change and to multifactorial environments. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020;8:271. [Google Scholar]
- 18.You M., Ke F., You S., Wu Z., Liu Q., He W., Baxter S.W., Yuchi Z., Vasseur L., Gurr G.M., et al. Variation among 532 genomes unveils the origin and evolutionary history of a global insect herbivore. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2321. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16178-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen Y., Liu Z., Régnière J., Vasseur L., Lin J., Huang S., Ke F., Chen S., Li J., Huang J., et al. Large-scale genome-wide study reveals climate adaptive variability in a cosmopolitan pest. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:7206. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27510-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Portnoy V.A., Bezdan D., Zengler K. Adaptive laboratory evolution--harnessing the power of biology for metabolic engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011;22:590–594. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Conrad T.M., Lewis N.E., Palsson B.Ø. Microbial laboratory evolution in the era of genome-scale science. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7:509. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hindré T., Knibbe C., Beslon G., Schneider D. New insights into bacterial adaptation through in vivo and in silico experimental evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:352–365. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Latif H., Sahin M., Tarasova J., Tarasova Y., Portnoy V.A., Nogales J., Zengler K. Adaptive evolution of Thermotoga maritima reveals plasticity of the ABC Transporter network. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:5477–5485. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01365-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Heerwaarden B., Kellermann V., Sgrò C.M., Williams C. Limited scope for plasticity to increase upper thermal limits. Funct. Ecol. 2016;30:1947–1956. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kellermann V., van Heerwaarden B., Sgrò C.M. How important is thermal history? Evidence for lasting effects of developmental temperature on upper thermal limits in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2017;284 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ma C.S., Ma G., Pincebourde S. Survive a warming climate: Insect responses to extreme high temperatures. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2021;66:163–184. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-041520-074454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Colinet H., Overgaard J., Com E., Sørensen J.G. Proteomic profiling of thermal acclimation in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013;43:352–365. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kristensen T.N., Kjeldal H., Schou M.F., Nielsen J.L. Proteomic data reveal a physiological basis for costs and benefits associated with thermal acclimation. J. Exp. Biol. 2016;219:969–976. doi: 10.1242/jeb.132696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ellis J.M., Li L.O., Wu P.C., Koves T.R., Ilkayeva O., Stevens R.D., Watkins S.M., Muoio D.M., Coleman R.A. Adipose acyl-CoA synthetase-1 directs fatty acids toward beta-oxidation and is required for cold thermogenesis. Cell Metab. 2010;12:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nguyen K.D., Qiu Y., Cui X., Goh Y.P.S., Mwangi J., David T., Mukundan L., Brombacher F., Locksley R.M., Chawla A. Alternatively activated macrophages produce catecholamines to sustain adaptive thermogenesis. Nature. 2011;480:104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature10653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kanamori Y., Saito A., Hagiwara-Komoda Y., Tanaka D., Mitsumasu K., Kikuta S., Watanabe M., Cornette R., Kikawada T., Okuda T. The trehalose transporter 1 gene sequence is conserved in insects and encodes proteins with different kinetic properties involved in trehalose import into peripheral tissues. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010;40:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Benoit J.B., Lopez-Martinez G., Elnitsky M.A., Lee R.E., Jr., Denlinger D.L. Dehydration-induced cross tolerance of Belgica antarctica larvae to cold and heat is facilitated by trehalose accumulation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2009;152:518–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu K., Dong Y., Huang Y., Rasgon J.L., Agre P. Impact of trehalose transporter knockdown on Anopheles gambiae stress adaptation and susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17504–17509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316709110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Karpova E.K., Eremina M.A., Pirozhkova D.S., Gruntenko N.E. Stress-related hormones affect carbohydrate metabolism in Drosophila females. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2019;101 doi: 10.1002/arch.21540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Evans E.W., Carlile N.R., Innes M.B., Pitigala N. Warm springs reduce parasitism of the cereal leaf beetle through phenological mismatch. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013;137:383–391. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Myers J.L., Porter M., Narwold N., Bhat K., Dauwalder B., Roman G. Mutants of the white ABCG Transporter in Drosophila melanogaster Have deficient olfactory learning and cholesterol Homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms222312967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Broehan G., Kroeger T., Lorenzen M., Merzendorfer H. Functional analysis of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter gene family of Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genom. 2013;14:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wigglesworth V.B. Transpiration through the cuticle of insects. J. Exp. Biol. 1945;21:97–114. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wigglesworth V.B. Sclerotin and lipid in the waterproofing of the insect cuticle. Tissue Cell. 1985;17:227–248. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(85)90091-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Juárez M.P., Fernández G.C. Cuticular hydrocarbons of triatomines. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2007;147:711–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hadley N.F. Cuticle ultrastructure with respect to the lipid waterproofing barrier. J. Exp. Zool. 1982;222:239–248. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chown S.L., Sørensen J.G., Terblanche J.S. Water loss in insects: an environmental change perspective. J. Insect Physiol. 2011;57:1070–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mackenzie S.M., Howells A.J., Cox G.B., Ewart G.D. Sub-cellular localisation of the white/scarlet ABC transporter to pigment granule membranes within the compound eye of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica. 2000;108:239–252. doi: 10.1023/a:1004115718597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yan Y., Ziemek J., Schetelig M.F. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated disruption of the white gene leads to pigmentation deficiency and copulation failure in Drosophila suzukii. J. Insect Physiol. 2020;126 doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Guo Z., Kang S., Zhu X., Wu Q., Wang S., Xie W., Zhang Y. The midgut cadherin-like gene is not associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in Plutella xylostella (L.) J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015;126:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kerr I.D., Haider A.J., Gelissen I.C. The ABCG family of membrane-associated transporters: you don't have to be big to be mighty. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011;164:1767–1779. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01177.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dermauw W., Van Leeuwen T. The ABC gene family in arthropods: comparative genomics and role in insecticide transport and resistance. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014;45:89–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tarr P.T., Tarling E.J., Bojanic D.D., Edwards P.A., Baldán A. Emerging new paradigms for ABCG transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1791:584–593. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nagao K., Juni N., Umeda M. In: Bioactive Lipid Mediators. Yokomizo T., editor. 2015. Membrane lipid transporters in Drosophila melanogaster in bioactive lipid mediators; pp. 165–180. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wellenreuther M., Hansson B. Detecting polygenic evolution: problems, pitfalls, and promises. TIG (Trends Genet.) 2016;32:155–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pritchard J.K., Di Rienzo A. Adaptation–not by sweeps alone. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:665–667. doi: 10.1038/nrg2880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rockman M.V. The QTN program and the alleles that matter for evolution: all that's gold does not glitter. Evolution. 2012;66:1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01486.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Messer P.W., Ellner S.P., Hairston N.G. Can population genetics adapt to rapid evolution? Trends Genet. 2016;32:408–418. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chi H., You M., Atlıhan R., Smith C.L., Kavousi A., Özgökçe M.S., Güncan A., Tuan S.J., Fu J.W., Xu Y.Y., et al. Age-Stage, two-sex life table: an introduction to theory, data analysis, and application. Entomol. Gen. 2020;40:103–124. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen Y., Chen Y., Shi C., Huang Z., Zhang Y., Li S., Li Y., Ye J., Yu C., Li Z., et al. SOAPnuke: a MapReduce acceleration-supported software for integrated quality control and preprocessing of high-throughput sequencing data. GigaScience. 2018;7:1–6. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li H., Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R., 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kofler R., Orozco-terWengel P., De Maio N., Pandey R.V., Nolte V., Futschik A., Kosiol C., Schlötterer C. PoPoolation: a toolbox for population genetic analysis of next generation sequencing data from pooled individuals. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kofler R., Pandey R.V., Schlötterer C. PoPoolation2: identifying differentiation between populations using sequencing of pooled DNA samples (Pool-Seq) Bioinformatics. 2011;27:3435–3436. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li B., Dewey C.N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinf. 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Liu S.S., Chen F.Z., Zalucki M.P. Development and survival of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) at constant and alternating temperatures. Environ. Entomol. 2002;31:221–231. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chi H., Liu H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin. (Taipei) 1985;24:225–240. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chi H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 1988;17:26–34. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Futschik A., Schlötterer C. The next generation of molecular markers from massively parallel sequencing of pooled DNA samples. Genetics. 2010;186:207–218. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.114397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
-
•
The source data is available as listed in the key resources table.
-
•
No original code was generated for this paper.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.











