Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2023 Aug 30;9:1196. Originally published 2020 Oct 5. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26689.2

UNICORNS: Uveitis in childhood prospective national cohort study protocol

Salomey Kellett 1, Jugnoo S Rahi 1,2,3,4, Andrew D Dick 3,5,6, Rachel Knowles 1,4, Valerija Tadić 7, Ameenat Lola Solebo 1,3,4,a
PMCID: PMC10905007  PMID: 38435080

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

Following the responses to reviewers, the following changes were made:  “Future work may also include the use of the Effects of Youngsters' Eyesight on Quality of Life (EYE-Q) instrument, which was developed and validated within a North American population with childhood uveitis, following validation of the use of this metric within a UK population. 40”  (in discussion)  New heading “Clinical data collection” and new text : “These data will be shared by the clinical team with the central research team, and used for analyses.” added to clinical data collection section in methods to make it clear that data will be used for analyses.

Abstract

Background: Childhood uveitis is a rare inflammatory eye disease which is typically chronic, relapsing-remitting in nature, with an uncertain aetiology (idiopathic). Visual loss occurs due to structural damage caused by uncontrolled inflammation. Understanding of the determinants of long term outcome is lacking, including the predictors of therapeutic response or how to define disease control.

Aims: To describe disease natural history and outcomes amongst a nationally representative group of children with non-infectious uveitis, describe the impact of disease course on quality of life for both child and family, and identify determinants of adverse visual, structural and developmental outcomes.

Methods: UNICORNS is a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study of children newly diagnosed with uveitis about whom a core minimum clinical dataset will be collected systematically. Participants and their families will also complete patient-reported outcome measures annually from recruitment. The association of patient (child- and treatment- dependent) characteristics with outcome will be investigated using logistic and ordinal regression models which incorporate adjustment for within-child correspondence between eyes for those with bilateral disease and repeated outcomes measurement.

Discussion: Through this population based, prospective longitudinal study of childhood uveitis, we will describe the characteristics of childhood onset disease. Early (1–2 years following diagnosis) outcomes will be described in the first instance, and through the creation of a national inception cohort, longer term studies will be enabled of outcome for affected children and families.

Keywords: Uveitis, Child, Prospective Cohort, Vision, Quality of Life

Background

Uveitis is a collective term for a varied group of rare conditions characterised by intraocular inflammation, in which uncontrolled disease can lead to irreversible ocular damage and visual loss 13 . It is less commonly seen in children than adults, with an estimated incidence of 5/100,000 children per annum 2, 4, 5 . Disease of childhood onset is typically chronic and relapsing-remitting in nature, and often complicated by the co-occurrence of systemic inflammatory disease 2, 6, 7 . The primary intraocular location of the inflammation is used to classify uveitis type into anterior, intermediate, posterior and pan-(global)-uveitis 8 . The majority of affected children (between 40–90% dependent on the studied population) have chronic anterior disease 2, 9, 10 . Whilst up to half of childhood uveitis occurs as isolated ocular disease, uveitis can also be classified by the presence of an associated disorder 8 , the most common being juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA, a group of diseases with an estimated pooled prevalence of 30 per 100,000) 11 . Infectious causes are also well recognised but uncommon 2 .

Affected children are managed with topical corticosteroids and systemic immunotherapies. Disease control is achieved in between 30–70% by one year after diagnosis 13, 6, 7, 9, 12 . There are uncertainties around the long-term outcomes for children with uveitis, and the determinants of those outcomes. Several relatively large but methodologically heterogenous retrospective studies have reported conflicting findings on postulated predictors of ocular outcome or therapeutic response, including gender 1215 , age at onset, disease duration, or serological markers such as anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) 1, 1620 . There are conflicting reports with regards to the beneficial or harmful role of topical steroids 20, 21 , and the prognostic significance of low grade inflammation 22, 23 . Consequently, there exists significant diversity of practice and absence of consensus on the management of disease 24 .

In order to improve outcomes for children with non-infectious uveitis, we need to describe long term outcomes and their predictors. Existing work on the predictors of arthropathy outcomes for children with JIA suggests that these predictors may be clinical, demographic, environmental, psychological and or social 2529 . We shall undertake a multi-centre, prospective inception cohort study, which aims to (1) describe disease natural history and outcomes amongst a nationally representative group of children with all-cause non-infectious uveitis, (2) describe the impact of disease course on quality of life for both child and family, and (3) identify determinants of therapeutic response, adverse visual, structural and developmental outcomes, and quality of life outcomes. We present the protocol for this study, the ‘Uveitis in Childhood Prospective National Cohort Study’, or ‘UNICORNS’.

Methods

Study setting

UNICORNS is a multicentre study which includes 26 secondary or tertiary care centres in the United Kingdom (UK) (see extended data - S1 30 ), although it will also be open to any hospital based paediatric ophthalmology service delivering care to children newly diagnosed with uveitis. Whilst participant identification and data sharing will occur across all sites, the primary research centre for the study will be the UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health.

Study population

Eligible children will be those aged under 18 years old (at diagnosis) who are newly diagnosed with uveitis. Exclusion criteria for the study includes (1) uveitis due to malignancy, ocular trauma (including iatrogenic, ie intraocular surgery), or due to confirmed ocular infection.

Recruitment

The families of eligible participants will be approached by their clinical team during the delivery of their routine care and informed of the study, and given contact details for the research team. Families will then contact the research team by email or by telephone to confirm their interest. A study video and study website have been established to support informed recruitment. Families will also contact researchers in person at sites where the research team are also members of clinical team. Families may also contact the research team electronically following notification of study via existing patient support groups which have agreed to support recruitment for this study (Olivia’s Vision, the largest uveitis patient group internationally). Following contact of the research team by the family, a study pack will be sent for completion. The study pack contains a participant information sheet, consent form, assent for young people, and a family background questionnaire which collects data on self-described ethnic background and the socioeconomic markers such as home ownership and parental educational attainment (see extended data - S2 30 ). On receipt of a completed consent form, the child’s clinical team and GP will be notified of the child’s recruitment.

Study procedures

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be collected from families at study entry and then annually over the duration of the study. The PROMs to be completed at baseline comprise:

- Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): This is to screen the emotional and behavioural aspects of the participants lives. It comprises of 25 items split across 5 scales assessing emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity-inattention, peer problems and prosocial behaviour 31 . It takes approximately 5–10 mins to complete, and will be completed by children aged over 10 years, and by parents for children aged over 2 years.

- Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D): This is a brief (<5 mins to complete) generic preference based measure of health related quality of life, specifically developed with and for young people 32 . It is to be completed by children aged over 7 years and parents for those aged over 2 years.

- Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ): This evaluates the incidence of behaviours linked with typical paediatric sleep difficulties 33 , and takes an estimated 5 to 10 mins to complete. It will be completed by children aged over 10 years, and by parents for children aged over 2 years.

- 100-mm general evaluation (GE): This visual analogue score (a horizontal line 100mm long) will be used to capture overall perception of the burden of the child’s uveitis. It will be completed by children aged over 5 years, and by parents for children aged 2–17.

At one year after diagnosis, and annually, children and their families will be invited to complete and return the following PROMS:

- 100-mm general evaluation (GE)

- Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D)

- Paediatric Quality of life Score (PedsQL): This is used to evaluate health related quality of life in children. It is a brief questionnaire (typically 5 mins to complete) to be completed by children aged over 5 years, and parents of children aged over 2 years.

- Vision related quality of life metric and Functional Vision Questionnaires for Children and Young People (VQoL_CYP & FVQ_ CYP): This pair of instruments captures the functional and broader impacts of living with a visual disability 24, 34 . They are self-completed for children over 8 years, and take 15 minutes to complete.

Interim analyses will be undertaken to understand the correlation between these PROMs, and in the event of strong correlation indicative of instrument redundancy, the use of the PROMS will be rationalised during the study in order to limit the time spent by the families in completing them.

At baseline all families will also be asked to complete a family background form (approx. time for completion 5 minutes). Parents of all children aged under 10 years will be asked (over the phone, or in person, approx. time for completion 5 – 10 minutes) for information available in pages of their child’s personal child health record (PCHR, or red book, current version in use since 2009). This information comprises perinatal adverse events, birth weight, vaccination history and any developmental concerns. Consent will also be sought from participating families and young people for future linkage of cohort data to routine health, social care and education databases for collection of long term broad developmental and health outcomes.

Clinical data collection

All participating centres have agreed in principle to collect, for all children presenting with uveitis, and then at every clinic appointment, a standardised clinical dataset comprising the core clinical and outcome variables (CCOV) (see extended data - S3 30 ). These comprise ocular and systemic clinical findings at presentation, serological and imaging investigations undertaken, treatments prescribed to the children and degree of therapeutic response, and clinical outcomes such as visual acuity of the development of a sight threatening complication. These data will be shared by the clinical team with the central research team, and used for analyses. This will enable exploration of confounders of disease outcome such as severity of disease at onset, age at onset, disease duration, and use of immunosuppression. Harmonisation work has been undertaken across sites ahead of study, to reach consensus on CCOV and the clinical definitions in use. The CCOV will be incorporated into routine clinical notes in either paper or electronic format, thus avoiding additional administrative burden to the collaborating clinician. Data are to be returned via postal and/or electronic transfer, or direct from clinical records by the research team. Data will be pseudonymised (through use of an alphanumeric link code) prior to return. Acquired images of the affected eyes will also, where possible, be returned to the research team via secure NHS to NHS DICOM® (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) image sharing networks. Annual case note review by researchers at large volume centres (>5 children recruited per year) will occur to ensure completeness of data capture.

Sample size

Our aim is to study all eligible children diagnosed across this multicentre network, over a period of 3 years, with an expectant consent rate of 60% and expectant attrition rate of 20%. This should result in a minimum of 250 children recruited over a three year period. This anticipated sample will allow us to reliably detect clinically important associations: at α=0.05, this sample size should >80% power to compare differences in proportions of at least 20% between groups. This assumes that the smaller group has at least 100 subjects 35 .

Outcome measures

These endpoints will be used, as measured every year following diagnosis:

Primary endpoints:

  • -

    New incidence of sight threatening ocular complications, including glaucoma, cataract, and macular oedema

  • -

    Quality of life

Secondary endpoints:

  • -

    Total prescribed topical and systemic corticosteroid burden

  • -

    Attainment of disease control (absolute control defined as absence of inflammation, relative control defined as the absence of inflammation greater than 0.5, the lowest grade of inflammation, with the use of less than one drop of topical corticosteroid)

The timeline for when these will be collected is provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Timeline showing collection of patient reported outcome measures on recruitment to UNICORN.

Procedure Study Period
Baseline Year 1 Annually
Family background
questionnaire
x  
General health questionnaire x  
SDQ x  
CHU9D x x (x)
CHSQ x  
GE x x x
VQoL_CYP / FVQ_CYP x (x)
PedsQL x (x)

SDQ: strength and difficulties questionnaire; CHU9D: Child Health Utility 9D; CSHQ: Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire; GE: 100-mm General Evaluation; PedsQL: Paediatric Quality of life Score; VQoL_CYP: Vision related quality of life metric – Children and Young People.

(x): in the event of strong correlation indicative of instrument redundancy, the use of these PROMS will be rationalised during the study in order to limit the time spent by the families in completing them.

Statistical analysis

Patient demographic, socioeconomic and clinic characteristics, and outcomes, will be described, as will the use of and timing of the different topical and systemic agents. Continuous variables will be reported as means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile range. Categorical variables will be reported as proportions, with 95% confidence intervals. Outcomes will also be stratified by uveitis type (anterior versus other uveitis, and JIA associated versus other uveitis), by age of onset, and by use of systemic therapy within the first six months following diagnosis.

The association of patient (child- and treatment- dependent) characteristics with outcome for the largest population (those with chronic anterior uveitis, expected to be 80% of the total group), will be investigated using logistic and ordinal regression models ( STATA / R software) which incorporate adjustment for time since disease onset. Multi-level modelling will be used for adjustment for within child correspondence between eyes for those with bilateral disease, and the clustered nature of repeated measures for this chronic disease.

Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) for sparse longitudinal data will be undertaken to investigate the different trajectories of ocular inflammation amongst children with chronic anterior uveitis. The covariates used in this investigation will be those identified as potential mediators through the regression analyses. Where children have bilateral disease, the most severely affected eye will be selected for use in modelling. For those children with symmetrical bilateral disease, one eye will be chosen at random for inclusion.

We shall also investigate the clustering of clinical findings within subtypes of all forms of uveitis disease using latent cluster analysis of demographic variables and clinical variables.

Ethics and dissemination

The study has been approved by the Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 258638, REC 20/LO/0661). This study will be registered with ClinicalTrials.org.

The results from this study will be published on the institutional website and published in peer reviewed journals. Study reports will be in accordance with the Strengthening the

Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement Guidelines (STROBE). Study newsletters will be made available online for participants and distributed through patient support groups. A study ‘Open Day’ will be held at the end of year 3 to inform participants on study progress and invite input on planned dissemination processes, with an online link to videos created during the day to involve those unable to attend on the day.

Patient and public involvement (PPI)

The study aims were informed by the priorities identified by stakeholders (patients and professional groups) who participated in the 2013 James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (JLA PSP) 36 . Amongst the top research topic priorities for those affected with inflammatory eye disease were the effectiveness of treatments, the ability to predict disease severity, the development of early detection methods, and the safety of current monitoring for ongoing chronic uveitis.

This study is supported by the Childhood Uveitis Studies Steering group (SSG), which was formed in April 2019 in order to provide ‘stakeholder’ guidance for study aims, methodology, and dissemination plans. The group consists of three young people directly affected by childhood uveitis, and three parents of affected children. This group have been supported and trained in research methods through written materials / presentations. At least two SSG meetings have been held each year since group formation with email communications between meetings. This group has co-developed the cohort study methods – e.g. selection of patient reported outcomes and study participant literature. This study has also benefitted from regular communication with the UK based patient led support groups for childhood uveitis (Olivia’s Vision) and childhood arthritis (‘JIA matters / Versus Arthritis’).

Data storage and management

Data are to be entered into study specific databases and manage by the research team (SK and ALS). All information collected during the course of the study will be kept strictly confidential. Forms will be anonymised and coded using a unique patient identifier assigned at the notification stage. Stored patient information will be kept on NHS and University computers, so as to be able to track the patient in the study. All patient information will be managed according to Data Protection Act 2018 requirements.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study will be made available (following anonymization) by the corresponding author on reasonable request. Authorised collaborators will be granted access to aggregated anonymised data from participants who have consented to this level of sharing, following review of their study protocol. Requests will be reviewed by the research team and a patient representative. Data and material transfer agreements will be required to be completed, in order to ensure regulatory compliance and that the interests of the participants are upheld and respected throughout.

Resources created through study processes will be shared upon reasonable request.

Study status

The study is currently open to recruitment.

Discussion

Uveitis carries the risk of blindness and can result in life long burden of avoidable disability and the attendant high financial and social costs of medical care, education, rehabilitation and support needed for visually impaired children and the adults they become. Improved understanding of the factors associated with favourable and adverse outcomes for affected children are necessary for planning care and service provision. This multicentre study will result in a nationally representative cohort of children with non-infectious uveitis, providing externally valid findings on the determinants of outcome. The prospective collection of patient reported outcome alongside an agreed minimal core clinical dataset will enable robust evaluation of the role of postulated risk factors with adjustment for identified confounding. It will also provide valuable information on the lived experience of these children, through the use of a range of patient reported measures. This allows UNICORNS to capture a more complete spectrum of patient centred outcomes than have been reported by previous studies. This study also offers a timely opportunity to investigate the outcomes of childhood uveitis in the United Kingdom at a time when more targeted, biologic agents such as adalimumab and tocilizumab have either been commissioned, or recommended for use in children with refractory disease 37, 38 . Within trial populations, up to a quarter of children continue to have uncontrolled disease despite the use of these agents 37 . UNICORNS will provide information on the feasibility of undertaking future ‘Trial within cohorts’ or other pragmatic interventional trial designs, and provide a data sharing infrastructure to support ‘classic’ randomised controlled trials of emerging novel interventions. Greater understanding of this population of children affected by a rare, chronic, inflammatory, idiopathic disease will also allow investigators to develop future nested trials of complex interventions which are targeted at patient (eg, packages of support around the time of transition and transfer to adult care), clinician (eg, decision support models for rare disease) or organisation level (eg, information sharing platform across primary and secondary care for rare disease). Future work may also include the use of the Effects of Youngsters' Eyesight on Quality of Life (EYE-Q) instrument, which was developed and validated within a North American population with childhood uveitis, following validation of the use of this metric within a UK population 39 . Thus, the findings of this cohort study will be of direct importance to clinical practice and future research within this disease area and beyond.

Limitations

This study design involves additional burden on the participants and their family through the completion of multiple carefully chosen and validated patient report metrics. These metrics characterise the family experience, global and vision related quality of life and health related utility. This allows for data collection on outcomes that our PPI work has shown to be of crucial importance to the affected families.

Observational studies such as UNICORNS are open to confounding, preventing causal inference when associations are reported. Our prospective design and use of a core minimal dataset should enable careful consideration of identified potential confounders. In order to strengthen study findings, all study reports will be reported in accordance with STROBE guidelines.

Attrition is always a concern with regards to longitudinal studies. This study is supported by a national clinical network, the Paediatric Ocular Inflammation Group 24, 40 , which will support follow up should children transfer from one clinical unit to another. The involvement of the child’s primary care giver, and the support of patient groups and their continued publication of study newsletters, is also expected to reduce attrition rates.

Summary

Childhood onset uveitis confers particular burden due to chronicity, the association with systemic inflammatory disease, and the frequent requirement for systemic immunosuppression. There remain unanswered questions around disease phenotypes, long-term eye and wider developmental outcomes, and the determinants of those outcomes, with resultant limitations in the evidence base used to counsel affected families, balance treatment decisions, or plan further research. We propose a population based, prospective longitudinal study of childhood uveitis, in order to describe the characteristics of childhood onset disease. We will describe outcome and investigate socio-demographic, clinical, biological and treatment related determinants of outcome. Early (1–2 years following diagnosis) outcomes will be described in the first instance, and through the creation of a national inception cohort, we shall enable longer term studies of outcome for affected children and families.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is approved by the UK Health Research Authority. Patients or their legal representative will have to sign an informed consent form before study entry. This study is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). Risks for participating in this study are expected to be very small to negligible and all patients will receive standard care. Objection or incapacitation of a patient or their representative will lead to exclusion from the study and analysis.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the clinical teams at the collaborating unites for their contributions to the study. We should also like to thank Phillippa Cumberland, Ulverscroft Senior Biostatician previously based at UCL GOS ICH, for her guidance with statistical design.

Funding Statement

SK and ALS are supported by an NIHR Clinician Scientist award [CS-2018-18-ST2-005]. JSR is supported in part by the NIHR BRC based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, and an NIHR Senior Investigator award. This work was undertaken at UCL Institute of Child Health/Great Ormond Street Hospital for children which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health’s NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved

Data availability

Underlying data

No data are associated with this article.

Extended data

Open Science Framework: UNICORNS extended data: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EUBMA 30

This project contains the following extended data:

  • -

    S1.pdf (List of collaborating centres)

  • -

    S2.pdf (Study information pack)

  • -

    S3.pdf (Minimal uveitis core dataset)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

References

  • 1. Gregory AC, Kempen JH, Daniel E, et al. : Risk factors for loss of visual acuity among patients with uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Study. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):186–92. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Edelsten C, Reddy MA, Stanford MR, et al. : Visual loss associated with pediatric uveitis in english primary and referral centers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):676–80. 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02148-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. de Boer J, Wulffraat N, Rothova A: Visual loss in uveitis of childhood. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(7):879–84. 10.1136/bjo.87.7.879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Acharya NR, Tham VM, Esterberg E, et al. : Incidence and prevalence of uveitis: results from the Pacific Ocular Inflammation Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(11):1405–12. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gritz DC, Wong IG: Incidence and prevalence of uveitis in Northern California; the Northern California Epidemiology of Uveitis Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(3):491–500; discussion 500. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Morelle G, Gueudry J, Uettwiller F, et al. : Chronic and recurrent non-infectious paediatric-onset uveitis: a French cohort. RMD Open. 2019;5(2): e000933. 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ferrara M, Eggenschwiler L, Stephenson A, et al. : The Challenge of Pediatric Uveitis: Tertiary Referral Center Experience in the United States. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2019;27(3):410–17. 10.1080/09273948.2017.1420202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jabs DA, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, et al. : Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):509–16. 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Paivonsalo-Hietanen T, Tuominen J, Saari KM: Uveitis in children: population-based study in Finland. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78(1):84–8. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078001084.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Clarke LA, Guex-Crosier Y, Hofer M: Epidemiology of uveitis in children over a 10-year period. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(4):633–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Thierry S, Fautrel B, Lemelle I, et al. : Prevalence and incidence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81(2):112–7. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kalinina Ayuso V, ten Cate HA, van den Does P, et al. : Young age as a risk factor for complicated course and visual outcome in intermediate uveitis in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(5):646–51. 10.1136/bjo.2010.184267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kalinina Ayuso V, Ten Cate HA, van der Does P, et al. : Male gender as a risk factor for complications in uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(6):994–99.e5. 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Couto C, Frick MM, LaMattina K, et al. : Chronic Anterior Uveitis in Children. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2016;24(4):392–6. 10.3109/09273948.2016.1167223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dana MR, Merayo-Lloves J, Schaumberg DA, et al. : Visual outcomes prognosticators in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(2):236–44. 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30329-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kalinina Ayuso V, Ten Cate HA, van der Does P, et al. : Male gender and poor visual outcome in uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(6):987–93. 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Saboo US, Metzinger JL, Radwan A, et al. : Risk factors associated with the relapse of uveitis in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a preliminary report. J AAPOS. 2013;17(5):460–4. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Paroli MP, Speranza S, Marino M, et al. : Prognosis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13(7):616–21. 10.1177/112067210301300704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sabri K, Saurenmann RK, Silverman ED, et al. : Course, complications, and outcome of juvenile arthritis-related uveitis. J AAPOS. 2008;12(6):539–45. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Blum-Hareuveni T, Seguin-Greenstein S, Kramer M, et al. : Risk Factors for the Development of Cataract in Children with Uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;177:139–43. 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Thorne JE, Woreta FA, Dunn JP, et al. : Risk of cataract development among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-related uveitis treated with topical corticosteroids. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(7):1436–41. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Angeles-Han ST, Ringold S, Beukelman T, et al. : 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(6):864–77. 10.1002/acr.23871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Constantin T, Foeldvari I, Anton J, et al. : Consensus-based recommendations for the management of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SHARE initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(8):1107–17. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Solebo AL, Rahi JS, Dick AD, et al. : Areas of agreement in the management of childhood non-infectious chronic anterior uveitis in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(1):11–16. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hanns L, Cordingley L, Galloway J, et al. : Depressive symptoms, pain and disability for adolescent patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(8):1381–89. 10.1093/rheumatology/key088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. McErlane F, Carrasco R, Kearsley-Fleet L, et al. : Growth patterns in early juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Results from the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS). Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(1):53–60. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Shoop-Worrall SJW, Verstappen SMM, Baildam E, et al. : How common is clinically inactive disease in a prospective cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? The importance of definition. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(8):1381–88. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hyrich KL, Baildam E, Pickford H, et al. : Influence of past breast feeding on pattern and severity of presentation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(4):348–51. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. McErlane F, Foster HE, Carrasco R, et al. : Trends in paediatric rheumatology referral times and disease activity indices over a ten-year period among children and young people with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: results from the childhood arthritis prospective Study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(7):1225–34. 10.1093/rheumatology/kew021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kellett S, Rahi J, Dick A, et al. : UNICORNS extended data. 2020.
  • 31. Stone LL, Janssens JM, Vermulst AA, et al. : The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4-7. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):4. 10.1186/s40359-015-0061-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, et al. : Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(1):15–27. 10.2165/11536960-000000000-00000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Owens JA, Spirito A, McGuinn M: The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ): psychometric properties of a survey instrument for school-aged children. Sleep. 2000;23(8):1043–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Robertson AO, Tadić V, Cortina-Borja M, et al. : A patient-reported outcome measure of functional vision for children and young people aged 8 to 18 years with visual impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;219:141–153. 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Solebo AL, Cumberland P, Rahi JS, et al. : 5-year outcomes after primary intraocular lens implantation in children aged 2 years or younger with congenital or infantile cataract: findings from the IoLunder2 prospective inception cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(12):863–871. 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30317-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Rowe F, Wormald R, Cable R, et al. : The Sight Loss and Vision Priority Setting Partnership (SLV-PSP): overview and results of the research prioritisation survey process. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7): e004905. 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ramanan AV, Dick AD, Jones AP, et al. : Adalimumab plus Methotrexate for Uveitis in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(17):1637–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa1614160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tappeiner C, Mesquida M, Adan A, et al. : Evidence for Tocilizumab as a Treatment Option in Refractory Uveitis Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(12):2183–88. 10.3899/jrheum.160231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Angeles-Han ST, Griffin KW, Harrison MJ, et al. : Development of a vision-related quality of life instrument for children ages 8-18 years for use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(9):1254–61. 10.1002/acr.20524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Solebo AL, Rahi JS, Edelsten C, et al. : Management of paediatric ocular inflammatory disease in the UK: national survey of practice. Eye (Lond). 2020;34(3):591–92. 10.1038/s41433-019-0518-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 23. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.155261.r245148

Reviewer response for version 2

Piergiorgio Neri 1

  1. The manuscript detailing the UNICORNS study offers a pioneering and comprehensive exploration into childhood uveitis, a rare but significant inflammatory eye condition known for its chronic, relapsing-remitting nature and idiopathic origins. This ambitious research project stands out for its meticulous approach to understanding the disease's natural history, its impact on the quality of life of the affected children and their families, and the determinants of adverse visual, structural, and developmental outcomes. The study promises to systematically gather and analyze data from children newly diagnosed with non-infectious uveitis nationwide by employing a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort design.

  2. Including patient-reported outcome measures alongside a core minimum clinical dataset is particularly commendable as it highlights the study's holistic approach, emphasizing the disease's physical, emotional, and psychological ramifications. The analytical strategy, employing logistic and ordinal regression models that account for the unique challenges posed by bilateral disease and repeated outcome measurements, showcases the research team's commitment to methodological rigor and precision.

  3. This study is poised to significantly advance our understanding of childhood uveitis by identifying critical therapeutic response predictors and defining disease control criteria. The creation of a national inception cohort for childhood uveitis enables the detailed characterization of the disease's onset and early outcomes and lays the groundwork for future investigations into the long-term consequences for affected individuals and their families. Through its thoughtful design and execution, the UNICORNS study represents a critical step forward in pediatric ophthalmology research, with the potential to inform more effective management strategies and ultimately improve the lives of those impacted by this challenging condition.

Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Immunology, Translational Medicine, Immune-pharmacology, Pharmacovigilance, Ophthalmology, Infectious Diseases, Medical Retina, Academic Research.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2021 Jan 4. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.29466.r75910

Reviewer response for version 1

Ivan Foeldvari 1

  • This is a unique project to learn more about childhood uveitis. Patients are assessed in a standardized manner regarding uveitis visual outcome and PROMs.

  • I am missing the application for EYEQL ( 10.1002/acr.20524 1 ).

  • It would be a great chance to apply the MIWGUC outcome measures prospectively, which offer a definition for inactive disease and response to treatment (10.1186/s12969-019-0345-2 2 ).

  • I would suggest an assessment of the patients every 6 months, the proposed annual follow up interval is to rare.

  • I missed the collection of data of activity of the associated condition, like JIA, sarcoidosis...

Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Pediatric Rheumatology, outcome research, juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis, juvenile localized scleroderma, juvenile systemic sclerosis

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Development of a vision-related quality of life instrument for children ages 8-18 years for use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) .2011;63(9) : 10.1002/acr.20524 1254-61 10.1002/acr.20524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. : Proposal for a definition for response to treatment, inactive disease and damage for JIA associated uveitis based on the validation of a uveitis related JIA outcome measures from the Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood (MIWGUC). Pediatr Rheumatol Online J .2019;17(1) : 10.1186/s12969-019-0345-2 66 10.1186/s12969-019-0345-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2021 Apr 21.
Ameenat Lola Solebo 1

We thank Prof Foeldvari very much for his comments. Responses to his suggestions for amendments to study methods are below: 

  • I am missing the application for EYEQL ( 10.1002/acr.20524 1 ).

UNICORNS will only be using metrics which have been validated for use in a UK cohort, and we look forward to using EYEQL once it has not been validated for use in a UK cohort

  • I would suggest an assessment of the patients every 6 months, the proposed annual follow up interval is to rare.

Children will continue to receive routine clinical care, which involves follow up at intervals of between 1 week and 4 months. The annual interval refers only to the collection of the specific patient reported outcome metrics.  

  • I missed the collection of data of activity of the associated condition, like JIA, sarcoidosis.

Data on general health status is routinely collected at clinical follow up (as indicated in the dataset documents) and will be extracted for use in UNICORNS analyses.

F1000Res. 2020 Oct 23. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.29466.r72432

Reviewer response for version 1

Joke de Boer 1

This is an important research project that will provide new information to improve treatment strategies in children with non-infectious uveitis. This project will provide an unique cohort of children with uveitis that longitudinally will be followed. The questionnaires will provide important information regarding the impact on patients suffering from childhood uveitis and their families. The outcome of QqL might also influence the care of these patients. The study is very well designed and patients are involved in the design of the project. The inclusion of 250 patients in 26 centers in 3 years is highly feasible.

The topics that need further clarification are the serology tests that are performed and how infectious causes are excluded.

However, several questions remain regarding the secondary endpoint for attainment of disease control. The authors state that absolute disease control is defined as absence of inflammation and relative disease control as absence of inflammation greater than 0,5, the lowest grade of inflammation. These definitions should be more specified because they might be different for the different anatomic subtypes of uveitis. For instance, is flare a grade of inflammation? Flare might permanently be raised after inflammation in anterior uveitis without cells in anterior chamber. Another example is intermediate uveitis where cells might be absent in anterior chamber in active diseases, however, cell in vitreous might persist for a long period without signs of active inflammation on fluorescein angiography. So disease control should be more specified for different anatomic subtypes of uveitis. Also the inflammatory parameters in the different anatomic subtypes that will be assessed should be mentioned.

Is the study design appropriate for the research question?

Yes

Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Not applicable

Reviewer Expertise:

My area of research is uveitis in children and adults.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study will be made available (following anonymization) by the corresponding author on reasonable request. Authorised collaborators will be granted access to aggregated anonymised data from participants who have consented to this level of sharing, following review of their study protocol. Requests will be reviewed by the research team and a patient representative. Data and material transfer agreements will be required to be completed, in order to ensure regulatory compliance and that the interests of the participants are upheld and respected throughout.

    Resources created through study processes will be shared upon reasonable request.

    Underlying data

    No data are associated with this article.

    Extended data

    Open Science Framework: UNICORNS extended data: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EUBMA 30

    This project contains the following extended data:

    • -

      S1.pdf (List of collaborating centres)

    • -

      S2.pdf (Study information pack)

    • -

      S3.pdf (Minimal uveitis core dataset)

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES