Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2024 Sep 11;12:827. Originally published 2023 Jul 13. [Version 5] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.134020.5

Isolation, morphological characterization, and screening virulence of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium robertsii fungal isolates  on Galleria mellonella

Dereje Geremew 1,a, Tadale Shiberu 2,b, Ararsa Leta 2
PMCID: PMC10905152  PMID: 38434644

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 4

In the new version some sentences added in the discussion.

Abstract

Background

Entomopathogenic fungi exists naturally in plants as an asymptote and have the potential to reduce the population of insect pests through indirect interactions. This study was conducted to detect and characterize the endophytic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium robertsii from the rhizosphere soil of tomato plants and their virulence effect on Galleria melonella.

Methods

From the rhizosphere soil of 40 tomato fields, three Beauveria bassiana and seven Metarhizium robertsii isolates were isolated using the galleria bait method. All fungi isolate were morphologically characterized by their colony color, shape, and surface texture. Isolates with the highest percentages of germination, conidial yield, and radial growth were selected, and their virulence was evaluated on second instar larvae of Galleria melonella under laboratory conditions.

Results

In this study, Beauveria bassiana showed white colony color and aseptate hyphae, whereas Metarhizium robertsii showed dark green to light green colony color and septate hyphal structures. Maximum spore production and conidial length were obtained by Beauveria bassiana isolate APPRC-27 with 2.67x10 7 spores ml -1 and 3.24 µm, respectively. Colony radial growth rates ranged from 1.73 to 3.24 mm day -1. The results revealed that the highest mortality rate of Galleria melonella (100%) was obtained by Metarhizium robertsii isolates K-61 and K-102 at a concentration of 1x10 8 conidial ml -1 at 7 days post-inoculation. The lowest mortality rate was registered by Metarhizium robertsii isolate RST-11.

Conclusions

In the present study, isolates that produced the most spores and had the highest germination rates were the most virulent to Galleria mellonella second instar larvae. Therefore, virulent entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium robertsii, are promising bioagents for the control of insect pests.

Keywords: Conidia, colony color, endophytic, entomopathogenic fungi, Galleria melonella, isolates

Introduction

Entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana, (Bals. -Criv.) Vuill. and Metarhizium robertsii (Metchnikoff) Sorokin, live in plant tissues without showing pathological symptoms ( Dutta et al., 2014). They have the potential to limit the feeding capacity, preference, and oviposition of stem boring, sap-sucking, and leaf mining insects on many crops by producing toxic compounds that disturb the insects performance. Additionally, they increase the plant defense mechanisms against pests or abiotic factors ( McCormick et al., 2016; Hokkanen and Menzler-Hokkanen, 2017). Entomopathogenic fungi are capable of penetrating their insect hosts through cuticular exoskeletons ( Zimmermann, 2007).

Entomopathogenic fungi have become more promising than chemical pesticides for the control of pests in Ethiopia due to pesticide resistance. This is due to the misuse of pesticides, which causes the incrementation of pesticide-resistant biotypes ( Negash et al., 2020), and a lot of pests have developed resistance due to the high use of pesticides ( Tabashnik et al., 2009). Consequently, using eco-friendly biopesticides like B. bassiana and M. robertsii as bioagents against agricultural pests is the best option to increase crop production and productivity. They are symbiotic with their hosts, reduce pest populations, and require little inoculum for their systemic transmission within plant tissues ( Nair and Padmavathy, 2014).

Identification and characterization of entomopathogenic fungi, B. bassiana and M. robertsii, are highly required for entomological research and essential for the selection of virulent isolates against several pests ( Boucias et al., 2000). Currently, the selection of virulent strains of entomopathogenic fungi as the biological control agent of pests is of great interest to many researchers ( Lacey et al., 2015). However, there is a limit to the work on the isolation, morphological characterization, and screening of virulent isolates of entomopathogenic fungi, particularly B. bassiana and M. robertsii in Ethiopia, to control agricultural pests. Hence, this study was made to identify, characterize the morphology, and screen the virulence of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates on Galleria melonella collected from rhizosphere soil in tomato plant farms at Koka and Guder areas in Ethiopia.

Methods

Description of the study site

The experiment was conducted at the Ambo Agricultural Research Center under laboratory conditions. Ambo is far away from Addis Ababa, 110 km to the west, at a geographical coordinate of 8°59′N latitude and 37.85°E longitude, with an altitude of 2,100 m a.s.l. The daily temperature ranges from 15 to 29°C, with an annual temperature of 22°C on average. The soil sample was collected from two sites, namely Guder and Koka in Ethiopia. Guder is located at a latitude and longitude of 8 o58′N and 374 o6E, respectively, with an altitude of 2,101 m a.s.l., whereas Koka is found at 8 o25′ N latitude, 39 o02′ E longitude, and an altitude of 1,605 m a.s.l. The minimum and maximum temperatures ranged from 12.14 to 27.39°C, respectively ( Etefa and Dibaba, 2011).

Sampling of rhizosphere soil from tomato plants

Rhizosphere soil was collected from tomato farmlands by uprooting vegetative-stage tomato plants. During the collection, the upper layer of soil was removed. A total of 40 rhizosphere soil samples were taken from two locations. Five samples were taken from each spot and mixed in a plastic bag before being taken to the bio-control laboratory of the Ambo Agricultural Research Center for the isolation of B. bassiana and M. robertsii. Finally, one kilogram (kg) of the soil sample was used for the isolation by removing unnecessary parts from the soil ( Sevim et al., 2010).

Isolation of B. bassiana and M. robertsii from Rhizosphere soil samples

From 40 soil samples, B. bassiana and M. robertsii were isolated by using the Galleria baiting method as follows ( Zimmermann, 1986; Belay et al., 2017).

One kilogram of soil sample was moistened by sterilized water and added to a 1.5 kg screw-capped glass jar. A total of 10 wax moth larvae were separately introduced into jars filled with soil samples and incubated at 26°C for 10 consecutive days under dark conditions.

Larval deaths were inspected and recorded every three days. The moisture of the soil was maintained by moistening it with sterile water daily. The cadavers were taken off the soil and surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 2 minutes, followed by 70% ethanol for 10 seconds, and rinsed three times with sterile water. Surface-disinfected larval cadavers were placed on sterile plastic plates with slightly wetted filter paper and incubated at room temperature up to the sporulation of outgrown mycelia.

The sporulation of B. bassiana and M. robertsii over the dead cadavers was examined, and the spores were harvested by a sterilized inoculating wire loop, transferred onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) Microxpress ® media, and incubated at 27±1°C for 14–21 days. Isolates were purified by subculturing on newly prepared SDA media, and pure cultures were preserved with glycerol and maintained on agar at -19°C for further work.

Morphological identification and characterization of isolates

Fungal isolates were morphologically identified and characterized using the identification key of Humber ( Humber, 1997), depending on fungal structures acquired from pure culture ( Gürlek et al., 2018). In addition to the new isolates, three B. bassiana (APPRC-44BC, APPRC-44BC-1, and APPRC-27) and one M. robertsii (S-26) isolates were also characterized from the Ambo Agricultural Research Center as standard checks for the comparison of isolates.

Consequently, the morphologies of B. bassiana and M. robertsii were characterized by the culturing of pure cultures on the SDA media, and inspection was done for 14–21 days. Both macroscopic and microscopic characterization of isolates was conducted by observation of morphological features of isolates. Macroscopic features such as mycelial color, colony reverse, colony shape and color, colony elevation, and surface texture were observed. Microscopic characterization of isolates was also done under an Olympus SC50 (CX33RTFS2, Olympus Corporation) microscope with ×40 magnification ( Barra et al., 2013) by measuring conidial length and diameter, hyphal growth, and conidiogenous cells using the slide culture technique.

Slide culture preparation

The technique was conducted by autoclaving a 9-cm-diameter Petri dish with filter paper and a bent glass rod. A 15 g -1 of water agar was cut by a 1 cm × 1 cm block with a sterilized scalpel blade and put on a glass slide. Fungal spores were inoculated on the four sides of the agar blocks by a sterile inoculating needle, and coverslips were placed on the block. Moistened filter paper with 2 ml of sterile water was placed over plates, sealed with parafilm, and incubated at 27±1°C.

Agar blocks were discarded after incubation for 72 hours, and the slides were moistened with a drop of 97% ethanol and enabled to heat fix by passing on an alcohol lump. A drop of lactophenol blue was used to stain the slide with a coverslip, which was later sealed with nail polish. The slide was placed under a SC50 microscope with ×40 magnification for the observation and characterization of conidiophore structure ( Rosana et al., 2014). Finally, the slides were permanently preserved for further characterization. The characterization and measurement of spore features such as conidial length and diameter were also done using the Sc 50 microscope (magnification, ×40).

Spore germination test for the viability of fungal isolates

The spore germination test was verified by the conidial germination test technique according to standard procedures ( Goettel and Inglis, 1997). Fungal spores were harvested from a 21-day-old culture by scraping with a sterilized spatula. Harvested spores were added to 10 ml of sterile water with Tween 80 (0.001% v/v) as a surfactant in a falcon tube and vortexing. Fungal spores were adjusted to 1 × 10 6 conidia ml -1 by using a Neubauer hemocytometer (USA) under a SC50 microscope.

In total, 100-μl of suspended spores was spread over fresh Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (Himedia ®), and two sterilized glass slides were placed on the media and incubated at 28°C for 18 hours. After 18 hours, germination of the spores was halted by dispensing with 70% ethanol. Both germinated and non-germinated cells were counted by using a Neubauer hemocytometer under a SC50 microscope (magnification, ×40).

The experiment was conducted under laboratory conditions in CRD with 15 treatments and three replications. A germ tube with more than half the diameter of the spore was considered germinated, and vice versa for non-germinated. Isolates with more than 95% germination were selected against G. melonella to test their virulence. The percentage of spore germination was calculated according to the method developed by Vega et al. (2008).

Percent spore germination=number of spores germinatedTotal spore counted×100

Radial growth rate

Conidia of 14-day-old cultures were harvested from plates and spread on a 90 mm Petri dish containing fresh SDA and PDA media separately. Isolates were incubated for three days at 27±1°C, and the 5 mm diameter of three-day-old cultures mycelium was taken by using a cork borer and placed in the center of a 90 mm petri dish containing SDA and PDA media individually. Cultures were incubated at 27±1°C ( Membang et al., 2021).

The experiment was conducted in CRD with 11 treatments and replicated three times. Data on radial growth were recorded in mm/day from the 4 th to the 15 th days and calculated by:

RG/day=Colony diameter at the end of incubation periodFungal disc diameterTotal incubation days

Where, RG/day is radial growth per day.

Estimation of conidial yield

Spore production was estimated as follows ( Schemmer et al., 2016). A 21-day-old culture of 10 mm-diameter circular agar was cut with a cork borer, and the disc was added to 10 ml of sterile 0.001% Tween 80 solution. The solution was well vortexed to evenly mix, and the conidial concentration was counted by using a Neubauer hemocytometer. The conidial yield was expressed in terms of conidial ml -1. The experiment was conducted under laboratory conditions in CRD with eight treatments and three replications.

Conidial suspension preparation

Conidia were obtained from pure cultures grown on SDA, which was incubated for 14 days at 27±1°C under dark conditions. Conidia were harvested by disposable cell scrapers and added into test tubes containing Tween 80 (0.001% v/v). Suspensions were vortexed well for 2 minutes and adjusted to 1 × 10 8 conidia ml -1 using a Neubauer hemocytometer ( Gurulingappa et al., 2010).

Rearing of Galleria melonella

Galleria mellonella larvae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) were reared at the Ambo Agricultural Research Center in the biocontrol room following the methods described by Meyling (2007). Adult moths were kept in 500-ml flasks containing folded tissue paper to fasten their mating and egg-laying capacities. To hatch second-instar larvae, the eggs were laid on folded tissue paper, transferred to plastic containers filled with 80 g honey, 50 g wheat bran, and 180 g glycerol, and incubated at 20°C for four weeks in the dark.

Virulence test of isolates using G. mellonella

The potential virulence of fungal isolates was tested using 2nd instar G. mellonella larvae by the galleria dipping method. Spores collected from 14–21 days of old culture by sterilized spatula scraping were adjusted to 1 × 10 8 spores’ ml -1 and 10 ml were prepared from the suspension of sterilized water with Tween 80 (0.001% v/v) in a sterilized falcon tube and vortexing well. A total of 10 second instars of G. mellonella larvae were dipped into spore suspensions for 15 sec. Treated larvae with fungal isolates were incubated at 26°C for 10 days under dark conditions. Cadavers were collected every day 3 days post inoculated, disinfected on their surfaces, transferred into sterilized plastic plates lined with moistened filter paper, and incubated in a dark place. Dead larvae were daily inspected and moistened with sterilized water to promote the outgrowth of mycelial on the cadavers. A control was treated with Tween 80 (0.001% v/v) and incubated under the same conditions ( Ayele et al., 2020). Isolates with greater than 90% mortality of larvae were selected, considered to be virulent isolates, and preserved for further work.

Data analysis

Germination test, radial growth, conidial yield and size, and virulence test of isolates data was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test with a statistical difference of P<0.05. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (RRID:SCR_008567) software 9.4 version was used for data analysis. Means were separated using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) at P<0.05.

Results

Morphological identification and characterization of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates

This study revealed that three B. bassiana and seven M. robertsii isolates were identified from rhizosphere soil samples of tomato plants. B. bassiana isolates showed white colony color, wide round to round colony shape, smooth powdery to smooth cottony surface texture, and raised colony elevation, as indicated in Table 1.

Table 1. Macroscopic features of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates.

Isolate name Isolate code Source Location Host plant Colony Color Colony shape Surface texture Colony elevation
front back
B. bassiana RST-8 Rh. soil Guder, Ethiopia tomato white yellowish wide round smooth powder raised
B. bassiana APPRC-27 soil Ambo ARC collection unknown white yellowish round smooth, powder raised
B. bassiana K-91 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato white yellowish round smooth, cottony raised
B. bassiana K-5 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato white yellowish round smooth, cottony raised
B. bassiana APPRC-44BC soil Ambo ARC collection unknown white yellowish round smooth, powder raised
B. bassiana APPRC-44BC-1 soil Ambo ARC collection unknown white yellowish round smooth, powder raised
M. robertsii RST-11 Rh. soil Guder, Ethiopia tomato dark green brown round thick flat
M. robertsii RST-12 Rh. soil Guder, Ethiopia tomato light green brown medium round thick flat
M. robertsii S-26 soil Ambo ARC collection unknown light green brown round thin, cottony flat
M. robertsii K-61 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato dark green brown round thin, adpressed flat
M. robertsii K-63 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato dark green brown round thin, adpressed flat
M. robertsii K-101 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato light green brown medium round thick, cottony slightly raised
M. robertsii K-7 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato light green brown round thin, adpressed slightly raised
M. robertsii K-102 Rh. soil Koka, Ethiopia tomato light green dark brown medium round thick, cottony slightly raised

Note: Rh=Rhizosphere, Ambo ARC=Ambo Agriculture Research Center.

Metarhizium robertsii isolates showed dark green to light green colony color at the front and brown at the backside, medium round to round colony shape, and flat to slightly raised colony elevation. Isolates K-101, K-102, RST-12, and S-26 showed a light green colony color, whereas K-61 and K-63 showed a dark green ( Figure 1). The surface texture was thin, thick, and cottony.

Figure 1. Morphology of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates.

Figure 1.

(A) Colony color (front) and (B) colony color (back) of B. bassiana. (C) Colony color (front) and (D) colony color (back) of M. robertsii. No manipulations were made to the image.

Results from microscopic features indicated that B. bassiana isolates showed a flask-like shape in a conidiogenous cell, a branched conidiophore, and hyaline and smooth conidia with a spherical to subglobose arrangement ( Figure 2) and aseptate hyphae ( Figure 3),

Figure 2. Microscopic feature of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates.

Figure 2.

(A and B) B. bassiana. (C and D) M. robertsii. No manipulations were made to the images.

Figure 3. Conidial structure and hyphae of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates.

Figure 3.

A= B. bassiana, B= M. robertsii. No manipulations were made to the images.

M. robertsii isolates revealed cylindrical in spore shape, branched, and densely intertwined conidiophore ( Figure 2) and septate hyphal structures ( Figure 3).

Spore viability

Spore germination was ranging from 79.33 to 99.03% within 18 hours of incubation at 27±1°C ( Table 2). The results showed that there was a statistically highly significant difference among isolates in the percentage of mean germination (F=54.6; DF=14; P<0.0001). Isolate K-61 showed a maximum mean percentage of germination, whereas the minimum mean percentage was recorded by isolate RST-12.

Table 2. Germination percentage of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates.

Fungal isolates Germination % ± SE
Beauveria bassiana RST-8 97.13±1.95 ab
Beauveria bassiana APPRC-27 98.1±0.59 ab
Metarhizium robertsii K-61 99.03±0.78 a
Metarhizium robertsii K-102 97.56±1.36 ab
Metarhizium robertsii RST-11 95.40±2.91 abc
Metarhizium robertsii K-63 97.63±1.82 ab
Beauveria bassiana K-5 97.03±1.63 ab
Beauveria bassiana APPRC-44BC 95.86±1.07 abc
Beauveria bassiana K-91 96.40±1.53 abc
Metarhizium robertsii K-101 97.67±1.24 ab
Metarhizium robertsii K-7 88.36±4.85 abc
Metarhizium robertsii S-26 80.80±9.83 bc
Beauveria bassiana APPRC-44BC-1 87.60±5.03 abc
Metarhizium robertsii RST-12 79.33±3.84 c
Tween 80 (Control) 0.00±0.00 d
HSD (0.05) 17.7
CV 6.71

Note: Means with the same letter, in the same column, are not significantly different according to Tukey’s studentized range (HSD) test at, α=0.05. CV, Coefficient of Variance.

Conidial yield and size

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference among isolates at P<0.0001 in their conidial production. Conidial production varies from 0.11 × 10 7 to 2.67 × 10 7 spores ml -1. Maximum spore production was attained by isolate APPRC-27, followed by isolate K-61, whereas the minimum conidial yield was recorded by isolate APPRC-44BC ( Table 3). The length of the conidia showed a mean value of 2.08 to 3.24 μm for B. bassiana isolates, and a higher conidial length was achieved by isolate APPRC-27 with 3.24 μm. The highest and lowest conidial diameters were recorded by isolates APPRC-27 and K-91, respectively.

Table 3. Conidial yield and size of isolates.

Isolate Conidial yield/ml ± SE Conidial length (μm) ± SE Conidial width (μm) ± SE Length/width ratio ± SE
B. bassiana APPRC-44BC 0.11 × 10 7±0.16 e 2.85±0.03 cd 1.86±0.16 c 1.56±0.12 c
M. robertsii K-63 1.67 × 10 7±0.02 cb 7.10±0.24 a 2.49±0.06 a 2.86±0.13 ab
B. bassiana K-5 0.17 × 10 7±0.01 e 2.23±0.02 d 1.45±0.05 d 1.54±0.07 c
M. robertsii K-102 1.81 × 10 7±0.18 cb 6.43±0.11 ab 1.93±0.03 c 3.32±0.03 a
B. bassiana APPRC-27 2.67 × 10 7±0.17 a 3.24±0.11 c 1.99±0.06 c 1.63±0.05 c
B. bassiana K-91 1.53 × 10 7±0.01 cd 2.08±0.07 d 1.36±0.03 d 1.53±0.03 c
B. bassiana RST-8 1.28 × 10 7±0.04 d 2.51±0.05 cd 1.64±0.11 cd 1.54 c
M. robertsii K-61 1.85 × 10 7±0.15 b 5.78±0.48 b 2.36±0.04 ab 2.44±0.20 b
HSD at (0.05) 0.29 0.99 0.40 0.54
CV (%) 7.46 10.40 8.93 11.15

Note: Means with the same letter, in the same column, are not significantly different according to Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) test at, α=0.05.

Regarding M. robertsii isolates, maximum conidial length and diameter were registered by isolate K-63, while minimum conidial length was obtained by isolate K-61 ( Table 3). The lowest conidial diameter was recorded by isolate K-102 (1.93 μm) when compared to others ( Figure 3).

Comparison of colony radial growth on a different media

Colony radial growth rates ranged from 1.73 to 3.24 mm day -1 ( Figure 4). The highest colony radial growth rate was achieved by B. bassiana isolate K-91 on SDA, which increased by 16.96% radial growth compared to PDA media. The minimum radial growth rate was scored by isolate 44BC on both media.

Figure 4. Mean radial growth of fungal isolates on SDA and PDA media.

Figure 4.

SDA, Sabouraud Dextrose Agar; PDA, Potato Dextrose Agar; RGSDA, radial growth on SDA; RGPDA, radial growth on PDA. No manipulations were made to the images.

Concerning M. robertsii isolates, K-61 showed the highest radial growth with 2.92 on SDA media, followed by K-63 (2.85) mm day -1. Isolate RST-11 showed the lowest colony growth on PDA media.

In this study, the maximum growth rate was recorded on SDA media rather than PDA after 15 days of incubation at 27°C±1 for both species of isolates.

Virulence test of isolates on G. mellonella

Most isolates were virulent to Great Wax Moth ( G. melonella) of second instar larvae, with 75–100% mortality after seven days of inoculation of treatments ( Table 4). The mean percentage of mortality of G. melonella larvae by B. bassiana and M. robertsii was highly variable (F = 101.49; DF = 10; P < 0.0001). Maximum mean percentage mortality was achieved by M. robertsii isolates K-61 and K-102, while minimum mortality was recorded by M. robertsii isolate RST-11.

Table 4. Mortality of G. melonella larvae by B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates.

Fungal isolates Percentage of mortality ± SE
Metarhizium robertsii K-61 100±0.00 a
Metarhizium robertsii K-102 100±0.00 a
Metarhizium robertsii K-63 97.5±0.25 ab
Beauveria bassiana K-91 95.00±0.28 abc
Beauveria bassiana APPRC-27 92.5±0.25 abcd
Beauveria bassiana RST-8 90.00±0.28 abcd
Beauveria bassiana APPRC-44BC 85.00±0.28 bcde
Beauveria bassiana K-5 82.5±0.47 cde
Metarhizium robertsii K-101 80.00±0.40 ed
Metarhizium robertsii RST-11 75.00±0.28 e
Control (Tween 80) 7.5±0.25 f
HSD at (0.05) 1.37
CV (%) 6.31

Note: Means with the same letter, in the same column, are not significantly different according to Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) test at, α=0.05.

Discussion

From the fungal isolates collected from the soil rhizosphere of tomato plants, 70% of them had characteristics typical of the species M. robertsii. In the present study, six B. bassiana and eight M. robertsii were morphologically characterized to understand the potential virulence of entomopathogenic fungi. B. bassiana has a white colony color and is round in shape, whereas M. robertsii has a dark to light colony color and is medium-round to round in shape. Similar work was done by Deb and Dutta (2021). This result was confirmed by the previous findings of different researchers, they reported M. robertsii isolates indicating a round colony shape, thin to thick adpressed texture, and flat to slightly raised elevation ( Sepúlveda et al., 2016).

This study also detected a microscopic feature of isolates. Consequently, B. bassiana had aseptate hyphae and M. robertsii showed a cylindrical shape with septate hyphae. A similar study reported that microscopic characterization of B. bassiana isolates indicated round to slightly round conidial shape with glassy-like aseptate hyphae, while M. robertsii were described as having cylindrical conidial shape, septate hyphae, and branched conidiophores in the form of a candelabrum ( Bich et al., 2021).

Germination is one component that affects the degree of virulence; the faster the germination rate, the higher the fungal infection of pests ( Herlinda, 2010). This study showed that the highest conidial germination was achieved by M. robertsii isolate K-61 (99.03%) within 18 hours of incubation. This result is consistent with a study conducted by Gebremariam et al., (2021), in which spore germination percentage varied between 85.43 and 99.67% within 24 hours of incubation for 26 isolates. Likewise, conidial germination of Beauveria isolates ranged from 76.33 to 95.75% ( Belay and Tenkegna, 2017), and 89.30 to 99% of spore viability were recorded by 22 isolates of B. bassiana and M. robertsii ( Mkiga et al., 2020).

Maximum sporulation rate, radial growth, and fast germination rate were the most important parameters for determining virulent isolates of entomopathogenic fungi, and the variation in virulence among isolates may be due to the geographical source of isolates and the potential of fungal species ( Dotaona et al., 2015; Gebremariam et al., 2021). This result revealed that the highest radial growth rates were obtained by B. bassiana isolate K-91 (3.24 mm/day) and M. robertsii isolate K-61 (2.92 mm day -1) on SDA media at 27°C ±. This is consistent with M. robertsii developed on SDA media at 30°C, the temperature at which the rates ranged from 0.14 to 3.39 mm day -1 ( Rodríguez et al., 2009). The present study revealed that all isolates showed maximum colony radial growth on SDA media rather than PDA. This may be due to the variation in nutrient contents between the media as SDA is selective. However, Gebremariam et al. (2021) reported that the radial growth of B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates attained between 0.83 and 3.43-mm day -1 by AAUEM-3 and AAUMFB-77 isolates, respectively, which were grown on PDA media at 25°C.

In the case of M. robertsii isolates K-61 and K-102 showed higher virulence levels than other fungal isolates to G. melonella under laboratory conditions at seven days post-inoculated. The result confirmed the findings of previous work ( Ibrahim et al., 2016). All isolates of B. bassiana and M. robertsii showed greater than 86% larval mortality, which indicated that isolates were virulent to G. mellonella. These findings were agreed upon in the work of Kebede (2019), in which it was reported that the top eight isolates of B. bassiana and M. robertsii were virulent to G. mellonella with above 75% larval mortality.

The results from microscopic features such as conidial length and width revealed that there was a highly significant difference among isolates. Accordingly, the highest conidial length was obtained with 7.10 and 3.24 μm for M. robertsii isolate K-63 and B. bassiana isolate APPRC-27, respectively . This agrees with previous work conducted by Doolotkeldieva et al. (2019), who reported the conidial length and width of B. bassiana were 2.27 and 1.85 μm, respectively, with a length to width ratio of 1.23 μm. Bich et al. (2021) also indicated that the conidial diameters of B. bassiana showed a mean value of 1.7 to 2.3 μm. Mongkolsamrit et al. (2020) also stated that M. robertsii showed a cylindrical to ellipsoid conidial shape with 5-7 and 2-3 μm in conidial length and width, respectively. However, Sepúlveda et al. (2016) reported that lower conidial lengths vary between 4.52 and 5.54 μm for M. robertsii strains. This may be due to the variation in the ecology of fungal species.

Conclusions

Correct identification of entomopathogenic fungi through morphological characterization is a baseline for the selection of virulent isolates for the management of agricultural pests. There was a variation in morphological features among all isolates in terms of colony color, shape, and texture. Isolates with the highest germination percentage and maximum spore production were virulent to second instar larvae of G. mellonella. Accordingly, M. robertsii isolates K-61 and K-102 were highly virulent to G. melonella by the Galleria dipping method, with a 100% mortality rate at 10 days post inoculated at a concentration of 1 × 10 8 conidial ml -1. This study showed that virulent B. bassiana and M. robertsii isolates collected from rhizospheric soil of tomato plant had the potential to control pests sustainable and cost-effective, and increasing crop production and productivity using this eco-friendly method. Hence, it is recommended to use B. bassiana and M. robertsii due to their endophytic properties for the management of agricultural pests, particularly insect pests. Moreover, further studies are needed on the factors attributed to the distribution, ecology, efficacy, and root association of B. bassiana and M. robertsii with tomato and other Solanaceae plants against pests.

Acknowledgments

The Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) acknowledged for the financial support. The authors are grateful to the Ambo Agriculture Research Center’s biocontrol research team for their assistance with laboratory experiments. Furthermore, the authors thank Mr. Denberu Kebede, Ms. Aberash Chala, and Mr. Tesfaye Abdisa for their assistance with the laboratory work. The authors also thank Tariku Hunduma (PhD) for his technical support in methodology development. The authors confirmed that the EIAR and individuals mentioned in this section permitted their names to be included in this publication.

Funding Statement

The project was funded by the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), and Dereje Geremew was assigned as grant coordinator. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 5; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

Underlying data

DANS-EASY: Entomopathogenic fungi characterization data, https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-27p-epm2 ( Geremew, 2023).

This project contains the following underlying data:

  • Germination (germination test of entomopathogenic isolates)

  • Radial growth PDA (radial growth of isolates on PDA media)

  • Radial growth SDA (radial growth of isolates on SDA media)

  • Screening (pathogenicity screening of isolates on Galleria melonella)

  • Conidial length and width (conidial size of isolates)

  • Conidial yield (conidial yield of isolates)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

References

  1. Ayele BA, Muleta D, Venegas J, et al. : Morphological, molecular, and pathogenicity characteristics of the native isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae against the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick 1917)(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Ethiopia. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2020;30(1):1–11. 10.1186/s41938-020-00261-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barra P, Rosso L, Nesci A, et al. : Isolation and identification of entomopathogenic fungi and their evaluation against Triboliumconfusum, Sitophilus zeamais, and Rhyzoperthadominica in stored maize. J. Pest. Sci. 2013;86(2):217–226. 10.1007/s10340-012-0460-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Belay YC, Meressa BH, Alemu T, et al. : Molecular detection of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana isolates from soils of coffee growing areas in Ethiopia using rDNA-ITS. J. Appl. Biosci. 2017;119:11943–11953. [Google Scholar]
  4. Belay YC, Tenkegna TAJJAB: Bioassay and pilot mass production of entomopathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana for the control of coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei: Scolytidae), Ferrari. J. Appl. Biosci. 2017;117:11669–11683. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bich GA, Castrillo ML, Kramer FL, et al. : Morphological and molecular identification of entomopathogenic fungi from agricultural and forestry crops. Floresta e Ambiente. 2021;28. 10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2018-0086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boucias DG, Tigano MS, Sosa-Gomez DR, et al. : Genotypic properties of the entomopathogenic fungus Nomuraea rileyi. Biol. Control. 2000;19(2):124–138. 10.1006/bcon.2000.0857 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deb L, Dutta P: Antagonistic potential of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin against Pythium myriotylum causing damping off of tomato. Indian Phytopathol. 2021;74(3):715–728. 10.1007/s42360-021-00372-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doolotkeldieva T, Bobusheva S, Kulmanbetova A, et al. : Characterization of Beauveria bassiana isolates from Kyrgyzstan. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2019;167:107243. 10.1016/j.jip.2019.107243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dotaona R, Wilson BA, Stevens MM, et al. : Screening of tropical isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae) for virulence to the sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2015;35(4):153–163. 10.1017/S1742758415000211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dutta D, Puzari KC, Gogoi R, et al. : Endophytes: exploitation as a tool in plant protection. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2014;57:621–629. 10.1590/S1516-8913201402043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Etefa Y, Dibaba K: Physical and socio-economic profile of West Shewa zone and districts: Bureau of finance and economic development regional data and information core process: the national regional government of Oromia. Addis Ababa:2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gebremariam A, Chekol Y, Assefa F: Phenotypic, molecular, and virulence characterization of entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana (Balsam) Vuillemin, and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschn.) Sorokin from soil samples of Ethiopia for the development of mycoinsecticide. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e07091. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geremew D: Entomopathogenic fungi characterization data.[Dataset]. DANS. 2023. 10.17026/dans-27p-epm2 [DOI]
  14. Goettel MS, Inglis GD: Fungi: hyphomycetes. Manual of techniques in insect pathology. Academic Press;1997;213–249. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gürlek S, Sevim A, Sezgin FM, et al. : Isolation and characterization of Beauveria and Metarhizium spp. from walnut fields and their pathogenicity against the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control. 2018;28(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gurulingappa P, Sword GA, Murdoch G, et al. : Colonization of crop plants by fungal entomopathogens and their effects on two insect pests when in planta. Biol. Control. 2010;55(1):34–41. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.06.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herlinda S: Spore density and viability of entomopathogenic fungal isolates from Indonesia, and their virulence against Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae). Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2010;21(1):11–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hokkanen HMT, Menzler-Hokkanen INGEBORG: Use of entomopathogenic fungi in the insect pest management of Brassica oilseed crops. Integrated management of insect pests on canola and other Brassica oilseed crops. Boston, MA: CAB International;2017;373–382. [Google Scholar]
  19. Humber RA: Fungiidentification. Manual of techniques in insect pathology. Academic Press;1997;153–185. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ibrahim AA, Mohamed HF, El-Naggar SEM, et al. : Isolation and selection of entomopathogenic fungi as biocontrol agent against the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Egyptian Journal of Biological. Pest Control. 2016;26(2):249. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kebede Aragaw DENBERU: Evaluation of Endophytes associated with Maize and Entomopathogenic Fungi against the spotted Stem borer, Chilo partellus (Doctoral Dissertation, Addis Ababa University). 2019.
  22. Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, et al. : Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015;132:1–41. 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McCormick AC, Reinecke A, Gershenzon J, et al. : Feeding experience affects the behavioral response of polyphagous gypsy moth caterpillars to herbivoreinduced poplar volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 2016;42(5):382–393. 10.1007/s10886-016-0698-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Membang G, Ambang Z, Mahot HC, et al. : Thermal response and horizontal transmission of cameroonian isolates of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae–Candidates for microbial controls of the banana root borer Cosmopolites sordidus. Fungal Ecol. 2021;50:101042. 10.1016/j.funeco.2021.101042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Meyling NV: Methods for isolation of entomopathogenic fungi from the soil environment-laboratory manual. 2007.
  26. Mkiga AM, Mohamed SA, Plessis H, et al. : Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana: pathogenicity, horizontal transmission, and their effects on reproductive potential of Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2020;113(2):660–668. 10.1093/jee/toz342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mongkolsamrit S, Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, et al. : Revisiting Metarhizium and the description of new species from Thailand. Stud. Mycol. 2020;95(1):171–251. 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nair DN, Padmavathy S: Impact of endophytic microorganisms on plants, environment and humans. Sci. World J. 2014;2014:1–11. 10.1155/2014/250693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Negash B, Azerefegn F, Ayalew G: Insecticide resistance management against thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on onion in the central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2020;40(4):759–767. 10.1007/s42690-020-00127-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodríguez M, Gerding M, France A, et al. : Evaluation of Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae Qu-M845 isolate to control Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) in laboratory and field trials. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2009;69(4):541–547. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosana Y, Matsuzawa T, Gonoi T, et al. : Modified slide culture method for faster and easier identification of dermatophytes. Microbiol. Indones. 2014;8(3):135–137,139. 10.5454/mi.8.3.7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schemmer R, Chládeková P, Medo J, et al. : Natural prevalence of entomopathogenic fungi in hibernating pupae of Cameraria ohridella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and virulence of selected isolates. 2016;52:199–208. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sepúlveda M, Vargas M, Gerding M, et al. : Molecular, morphological and pathogenic characterization of six strains of Metarhizium spp.(Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) for the control of Aegorhinus superciliosus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2016;76(1):77–83. 10.4067/S0718-58392016000100011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sevim A, Demir I, Höfte M, et al. : Isolation and characterization of entomopathogenic fungi from hazelnut-growing region of Turkey. Biocontrol. 2010;55(2):279–297. 10.1007/s10526-009-9235-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tabashnik BE, Van Rensburg JBJ, Carrière Y: Field-evolved insect resistance to Bt crops: definition, theory, and data. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009;102(6):2011–2025. 10.1603/029.102.0601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vega FE, Posada F, Aime MC, et al. : Entomopathogenic fungal endophytes. Biol. Control. 2008;46(1):72–82. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zimmermann G: Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii. Biocontrol Sci. Tech. 2007;17(6):553–596. 10.1080/09583150701309006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zimmermann G: The ‘Galleria bait method for detection of entomopathogenic fungi in soil. J. Appl. Entomol. 1986;102(1-5):213–215. 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1986.tb00912.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 Feb 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.161449.r243892

Reviewer response for version 4

Linnet Gohole 1

Discussion

1. The first sentence of the discussion is still confusing. I suggest that it should be re-written to read "Of the fungal isolates collected from the soil rhizosphere of tomato plants, 70% of them had characteristics typical of the species M. robertsii". 

2. The discussion is still largely missing on scientific explanations to the findings obtained. Had this been done, then the manuscript would have been scientifically richer.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No source data required

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Entomology, biological control of insect pests and integrated pest management.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2024 Aug 6.
Dereje Geremew 1

Dear Reviewer,

All comments are accepted and included in the new version of article.

F1000Res. 2023 Nov 8. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.158147.r219340

Reviewer response for version 3

Linnet Gohole 1

I have looked at the revised version of the manuscript (Version 3) and going by the comments earlier made bullet by bullet, I note only 3 of the queries have been addressed. The purpose of giving feedback is to improve the manuscript and I strongly recommend that the comments are considered seriously and incorporated accordingly to improve the quality of the paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No source data required

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Entomology, biological control of insect pests and integrated pest management.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Jan 15.
Dereje Geremew 1

General comment

Pathogenicity and virulence are not interchangeable, as the virulence of isolates tested in the experiment. I accepted the comment and modified it accordingly.

F1000Res. 2024 Jan 15.
Dereje Geremew 1

All necessary comments were accepted and included in the new version of the article. The title of the article was also modified accordingly.

F1000Res. 2023 Oct 31. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.158147.r219341

Reviewer response for version 3

Tinatin Doolotkeldieva 1

The authors have significantly improved the manuscript material; I, as a reviewer, confirm that the published article has undergone adjustments according to the reviewer’s recommendations.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Biocontrol, entomopthogenic bacteria, fungi, soil microbiology, plant pathogology, biopecticides, bioremediation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2023 Sep 20. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.154480.r198218

Reviewer response for version 2

Linnet Gohole 1

1. Suggestion for title: Isolation, morphological characterization and screening virulence of B. bassiana and M. robertsii fungal isolates in G. melonella.

Abstract

2. Background - the word asymptote should read asymptomatic.

3. Methods - Galleria bait method is used to isolate fungi and not to identify them.

4. Amended conclusion - what is the rationale for singling out sucking insects as candidate pests to be controlled using the virulent fungal isolates, why not consider insect pests in general? 

Introduction:

5. The following sentence does not convey the intended message "Moreover, entomopathogenic fungi are the immediate solution for pests that feed inside leaves, stems, roots, and seeds because they reduce their exposure to synthetic insecticides and other control methods ( Resquín-Romero  et al., 2016)."

6. Was there anything special about collecting the fungal isolates from the rhizosphere of tomato plants?

Methods

7. Under morphological characterization, there is mention of 3 B. bassiana and one M. robertsii characterized for comparison purposes with new isolates. Can it be clarified why these 4 isolates were included in the study.

8. How many isolates were eventually tested in the various experiments? The number of treatments keeps changing with each experiment and no explanation is given on how these isolates were selected.

9. "To hatch third- to fourth-instar larvae, the eggs were laid on folded tissue paper ...." Was this sentence meant to inform readers of the egg laying process, hatching and eventually obtaining 3rd - 4th instar larvae to be used in the pathogenicity experiments? Eventually 2nd instar larvae were used. Clarify the use of the 3rd - 4th instars in the section on rearing Galleria. It is confusing.

10. Replace the word deepened with dipped. Larvae were dipped in spore suspension. 

11. Did collection of cadavers begin only after the larvae had been incubated for 10 days? If so, then for how long was this data collected? At what point was the greater than 90% mortality determined? i.e. after how many days? It cannot be indefinite.

Results

12. Fig 2. The hyphae in A look more septate than those in C. Better photos clearly showing the difference need to be taken.

13. The titles of the tables and figures need to be complete and more informative e.g. Table 4 is about % mortality caused by the various fungal isolates and not screening.

Discussion

14. The first sentence of the discussion is not clear.

15. The discussion section needs to go beyond repeating the results obtained and whether the agree or disagree with previous findings. It should focus more on scientific explanations of the interesting and unique findings of the current study. e.g. what could be the reason for some fungal isolates being more virulent than others; what do the findings imply when it comes to them being used as biological control agents; is there any connection between the isolate characteristics and virulence with where they were collected or the target crop - tomato?

16. The isolates were collected from two different locations with different ecological conditions, did this factor have some influence on the isolates collected and their performance?

17. Some already known isolates were added to the experiments, what does this finally mean?

Conclusion

18. The conclusion on reduction of usage of synthetic pesticides just because the fungal isolates showed high degree of pathogenicity was not a subject of investigation in this study. The conclusions should come directly from the study. Then the implications of these findings can then be speculated and areas of further research recommended.

General comments

1. The authors need to reconstruct some sentences to make them grammatically correct without losing the science being communicated.

2. Virulence and pathogenicity are used interchangeably in this manuscript. Do they mean the same?

3. The discussion and conclusion sections should be re-written to capture the suggestions given to help improve the paper.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No source data required

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Entomology, biological control of insect pests and integrated pest management.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 Oct 18.
Dereje Geremew 1

Question 9.

Response:  Galleria melonella were reared to get a mass of 2nd instar larvae, and 3rd and 4th larvae instar larvae were not used in the experiment.

F1000Res. 2023 Oct 18.
Dereje Geremew 1

Question 11. Response

Cadavers were collected every day after 3 days.

F1000Res. 2023 Oct 18.
Dereje Geremew 1

Question 17.

Response. The performance of some isolates were tested as standard checks with newly collected isolates

F1000Res. 2023 Aug 9. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.147045.r187389

Reviewer response for version 1

Tinatin Doolotkeldieva 1

Finding highly virulent entomopathogenic fungi remains an important challenge as an alternative to chemical pesticides. In this article, the authors tried to find two species of entomopathogenic fungi from tomato rhizosphere soil using classical methods of insect pathology, microbiology, entomology, etc.

However, the authors intended to isolate endophytic fungi, and not from the soil itself; in total, they isolated them from the rhizosphere soil, and not from plant parts.

Therefore, the authors should realize that they were dealing with soil fungi, this should be emphasized in the conclusions.

In conclusion, the authors suggest these strains for practical use, but it is too early to speak with such data, after extensive research by testing on other types of sucking insects and for the presence of endophytic properties, it will be possible to recommend them for practical purposes.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Biocontrol, entomopthogenic bacteria, fungi, soil microbiology, plant pathogology, biopecticides, bioremediation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 Aug 10.
Dereje Geremew 1

Agreed with the comments, and the comments were included in the conclusion of the article. The conclusion was modified as follows:

"Correct identification of entomopathogenic fungi through morphological characterization is a baseline for the selection of virulent isolates for the management of agricultural pests. There was a variation in morphological features among all isolates in terms of colony color, shape, and texture. Isolates with the highest germination percentage and maximum spore production were virulent to second instar larvae of  G. mellonella. Accordingly,  M. robertsii isolates K-61 and K-102 were highly virulent to  G. melonella by the Galleria dipping method, with a 100% mortality rate at 10 days post inoculation at a concentration of 1 × 10 8 conidial ml -1. This study showed that virulent  B. bassiana and  M. robertsii isolates collected from rhizospheric soil had the potential to control pests by reducing the use of synthetic pesticides, making them sustainable and cost-effective, and increasing crop production and productivity using this eco-friendly method. Hence, it is recommended to use B. bassiana and  M. robertsii due to their endophytic properties for the management of agricultural pests, particularly sucking insects. Moreover, further studies are needed on the factors attributed to the distribution, ecology, efficacy, and root association of B. bassiana and  M. robertsii with tomato and other Solanaceae plants against pests".

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Geremew D: Entomopathogenic fungi characterization data.[Dataset]. DANS. 2023. 10.17026/dans-27p-epm2 [DOI]

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    DANS-EASY: Entomopathogenic fungi characterization data, https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-27p-epm2 ( Geremew, 2023).

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    • Germination (germination test of entomopathogenic isolates)

    • Radial growth PDA (radial growth of isolates on PDA media)

    • Radial growth SDA (radial growth of isolates on SDA media)

    • Screening (pathogenicity screening of isolates on Galleria melonella)

    • Conidial length and width (conidial size of isolates)

    • Conidial yield (conidial yield of isolates)

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES