In this paper by Ben Messaoud and colleagues (BMJ 2023;381:e075719, doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-075719) the missing values in the data for peer reviewers affiliated to Africa were misclassified. The analyses have been updated following rectification of this error. Additionally, the cohort description has been revised to focus on the complete cases included in the main analyses.
. 2024 Mar 1;384:q528. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q528
Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 21 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic
Collection date 2024.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
PMCID: PMC10905560 PMID: 38428990
This corrects the article "Analysis of peer reviewers’ response to invitations by gender and geographical region: cohort study of manuscripts reviewed at 19 biomedical journals before and during covid-19 pandemic" in volume 381, e075719.
