Skip to main content
São Paulo Medical Journal logoLink to São Paulo Medical Journal
. 2012 Feb 13;130(1):10–16. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802012000100003

Infection profile of patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation in a Brazilian institution

Perfil de infecção em pacientes submetidos a transplante autólogo de medula óssea em uma instituição brasileira

Kelli Borges Santos I,, Abrahão Elias Hallack Neto II, Girlene Alves Silva III, Angelo Atalla IV, Marcus Matta Abreu V, Luiz Cláudio Ribeiro VI
PMCID: PMC10906693  PMID: 22344354

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been widely used for treating oncological and hematological diseases. Although HSCT has helped to improve patient survival, the risk of developing infection during hospitalization is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to analyze the infection profile during hospitalization and the associated risk factors among patients undergoing autologous HSCT at the University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

This was a cross-sectional study on patients undergoing autologous HSCT at a public university hospital.

METHODS:

Patients with febrile neutropenia between 2004 and 2009 were retrospectively evaluated re garding their infection profile and associated risk factors.

RESULTS:

Infection occurred in 57.2% of 112 patients with febrile neutropenia. The main source of infec tion was the central venous catheter (25.9%). Infection was chiefly due to Gram-positive bacteria, although Gram-negative-related infections were more severe and caused a higher death rate. Sex, age, skin color, nutritional status and underlying disease were not associated with the development of infection. Patients with severe mucositis (Grades III and IV) had a higher infection rate (P < 0.001). Patients who developed pulmonary complications during hospitalization had higher infection rates (P = 0.002). Infection was the main cause of death (57.1%) in the study sample.

CONCLUSION:

Strategies aimed at reducing infection-related mortality rates among patients undergoing autologous HSCT are necessary.

KEY WORDS: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Transplantation, autologous; Infection; Risk factors; Infection control

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been widely used for treating oncological and hematological diseases. Although its use has increased patient survival, the risk of infec tion is an important cause of morbidity and mortality among those undergoing this therapeutic approach.1

In spite of lower infection rates with autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT), in comparison with allogeneic BMT, infec tion is the second most frequent cause of death among patients under going autologous BMT, and is second only to disease relapse.2,3

Patient who have undergone autologous BMT are at higher risk of infection during the neutropenia period, and for up to 30 days after bone marrow grafting. The neutropenia period and breach of the mucocutaneous barrier are the main risks for devel opment of infections.4,5

Hospital-acquired infection rates among HSCT patients depend on disease severity, drugs used and invasive procedures performed.6 Furthermore, the more severe the neutropenia is, the more frequent and aggressive the infections are.4

OBJECTIVE

Taking into account the susceptibility of autologous BMT patients to infection during the neutropenia period, we assessed the infectious events occurring during hospitalization and their associated risk factors.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen patients underwent autologous BMT at the University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), between 2004 and 2009. Of these, 112 patients developed febrile neutropenia, and were analyzed. This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the University Hospital, UFJF.

All patients received antiviral prophylaxis consisting of acy clovir 240 mg/m2/day, divided into four doses, until they received the graft, and also received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 5 mg/kg/day, in accordance with our local protocol.

Three blood samples were obtained for blood cultures: one from each line of the central venous catheter and one from peripheral blood. Empirical treatment with cefepime (4 g/day, divided into two doses) was instituted for every neutropenic patient with fever.

Febrile neutropenia was considered to be present when ever a patient with a neutrophil count below 500/mm3, or below 1,000/mm3 but predicted to fall to below 500/mm3,7 developed a single axillary temperature reading ≥ 38 °C, or two readings ≥ 37.5 °C within a 12-hour period. Cultures of samples obtained from different sites were performed whenever a specific infec tious site was suspected.

After three days of treatment, the patients were reassessed and, if the fever persisted, a new blood culture was performed. The empirical therapeutic regimen was adjusted in accordance with the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).8

When blood cultures and cultures from the catheter tip yielded the same organism, with a higher number of colony-forming units (CFU) in the latter, and when the catheter tip culture grew more than 15 CFU, the infection was considered to be catheter-related.

For univariate analysis, the chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to determine the association between infection and risk factors (sex, age, underlying disease, duration of neutropenia, drugs used in the conditioning regimen, presence of mucositis, pulmonary compli cation, diarrhea and sinusoidal obstructive syndrome). Logistic regres sion was used for multivariate analyses, with the inclusion of variables that presented P values < 0.05 on univariate analysis. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 13.0 software was used for cal culations, and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Out of the 115 patients who underwent autologous BMT, 112 developed febrile neutropenia (97.39%). The median age of this latter group was 43 years (range: 8-69 years). Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population.

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population (n = 112).

Characteristics Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Sex
Male 64 57.1
Female 48 42.9
Associated comorbidity
Present 37 33.0
Absent 75 67.0
Underlying disease
Multiple myeloma 57 50.9
Hodgkin’s lymphoma 32 28.6
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma 18 16.1
Neuroblastoma 02 1.8
Acute myeloid leukemia 03 2.7
Conditioning
Cyclophosphamide, carmustine and etoposide 48 42.9
Melphalan 57 50.9
Carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan 5 4.5
Others 2 1.8
Total 112 100

The neutropenia period ranged from four to 25 days (median: nine days). Multiple myeloma patients remained neutropenic for seven days, on average, while those with lymphoma remained neutropenic for 12 days, on average (P < 0.001). Although the difference between the groups was significant, the duration of neutropenia was not associated with occurrences of infection (P = 0.323). There was no impact on the number of infused cells on occurrences of infection (P = 0.129).

Six out of 60 patients with positive blood culture had more than one microorganism. Table 2 shows the microorganisms yielded in the first and second blood cultures. One hundred and four different microorganisms were isolated, and the most fre quent ones were: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (24.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (13%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.1%), Escherichia coli (9.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.3%) and Enterobacter cloacae (4.3%). There were also isolates of fungi (Candida parapilosis, 0.9%; Candida albicans, 5.2%; and Fusarium sp., 0.9%) and intestinal parasites (Cryptosporidium spp., 1.7%; Isospora sp, 0.9%; and Strongyloides stercoralis, 2.6%).

Table 2. Frequency of microorganisms isolated from blood cultures.

Microorganism Number of cases in first blood culture % Number of cases in second blood culture % Total number of cases % total
Gram-positive bacteria
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 23 20.0 3 2.6 23 20.0
Staphylococcus aureus 9 7.8 5 4.3 11 9.5
Streptococcus alpha haemolyticus 1 0.9 - - 1 0.9
Total 32 27.8 8 6.9 34 29.5
Gram-negative bacteria
Enterobacteriaceae family
Klebsiella pneumoniae 13 11.3 - - 13 11.3
Escherichia coli 5 4.3 1 0.9 6 5.2
Enterobacter cloacae 5 4.3 - - 5 4.3
Serratia marcescens 1 0.9 - - 1 0.9
Non-fermenting
Acinetobacter baumanii 2 1.7 - - 2 1.7
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 3 2.6 - - 3 2.6
Non-identified non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria - - 1 0.9 1 0.9
Total 29 25.2 2 1.7 31 26.9
Fungi
Candida parapilosis 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9
Total 1 0.9 1 0.9 1 0.9
Total (all microorganisms) 62 53.9 11 10.4 66 57.3

Eighty-five instances of infection were identified in 63 patients (57.2% of the study population), of whom 22 (34.9%) had a sec ond source of infection. Table 3 shows the sources of infections identified in the study population.

Table 3. Sources of infection.

Characteristics Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Catheter-related infection 29 34.1
Oral candidiasis 24 28.2
Pneumonia 10 11.7
Bacteremia 05 5.8
Urinary infection 05 5.8
Skin infection 04 4.7
Intestinal infection 04 4.7
Systemic fungal infection 02 2.3
Vaginal candidiasis 02 2.3
Total 85 100

The catheter was the main infection source identified in the study population, and accounted for the infections of 29 patients (25.9% of the study population). Catheter-related infec tion was caused by Gram-positive bacteria in 48.3% of the cases (P < 0.001).

An analysis was made between different risk factors and occurrences of infection. Two cases were taken to be missing data, since it was not possible to determine the occurrence of infection. Table 4 shows the results from this analysis.

Table 4. Factors associated with infection during hospitalization*.

Features analyzed Total Presence of infection % P
Conditioning
Cyclophosphamide, carmustine and etoposide 46 25 54.3 0.600
Melphalan 56 32 57.1
Carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan 6 5 83.3
Others 2 1 50.0
Underlying disease
Lymphomas 48 27 56.3 0.575
Myeloma 57 32 56.1
Others 5 4 80.0
Associated comorbidity
Present 37 26 70.3 0.050
Absent 73 37 50.7
Mucositis
Present 59 39 66.1 0.044
Absent 51 24 47.1
Degree of mucositis
I 24 11 45.8 0.020
II 19 14 73.7
III 14 12 85.7
IV 2 2 100.0
Diarrhea
Present 72 39 54.2 0.365
Absent 38 24 63.2
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
Present 6 4 66.7 0.632
Absent 104 59 56.7
Pulmonary complications
Present 15 14 93.3 0.002
Absent 95 49 50.0
Sex
Female 47 30 63.8 0.230
Male 63 33 52.4

*Missing: two patients without data on infection.

Among the 63 patients for whom some kind of microorgan ism was identified as the cause of their infection, eight (12.6%) had fungal infection (Candida albicans), 30 (47.6%) had Gram positive bacteria and 25 (39.6%) had Gram-negative bacteria. Viral infection due to cytomegalovirus was identified by means of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in only one patient.

Oral candidiasis was associated with higher grades (III and IV) of mucositis (P < 0.001). Two patients developed fungemia: one due to Candida parapilosis and one due to Fusarium spp. Fungi (Cryptosporidium spp. and Isospora spp.) were isolated from the stools of two patients.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis grew in a culture from secretions obtained from a cutaneous abscess. Out of the 104 microorganisms isolated, nine (8.6%) were cefepime-resistant. Although three (21.4%) of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant (MRSA), they were uniformly sensitive to vancomycin. Blood cultures from six patients presented oxacillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

Among the eight patients who died of infection, three (37.5%) presented Gram-negative bacteria in their cultures, one had Fusarium spp. and four had no growth in the cultures performed.

Infection-associated factors

Mucositis (P = 0.04) and pulmonary complications (P = 0.002) during hospitalization were the only variables with a statistically significant impact on the occurrence of infection, on univariate analysis. Patients with higher grades (III and IV) of mucositis developed infections more frequently (P = 0.02).

Patients with associated comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and systemic arterial hypertension, were more likely to develop infection, although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.05).

Both variables that showed statistical significance in relation to infection on univariate analysis (mucositis and pulmonary complications) were included in the logistic regression models. The results from this model are shown in Table 5. Only pulmonary complications remained an independent risk on multivariate analysis (P = 0.015), with an odds ratio of 13. Although the confidence interval of the odds ratio for the variable of pulmonary complications was large, this was due to the low frequency of events. Nonetheless, 14 out of the 15 individuals who had pulmonary complications developed infections, which shows that there was a strong association between these variables. Even though the P value related to mucositis was slightly above 5%, stratified analysis showed that among individuals who did not have pulmonary complications, the infection rate was significantly higher among patients who developed mucositis (P = 0.032).

Table 5. Multivariate analysis with risk factors for infection.

Variables P-value Odds ratio 95% confidence interval
Lower Upper
Mucositis 0.054 2.21 0.98 4.94
Pulmonary complications 0.015 13.23 1.65 105.98

*Adjusted for mucositis and pulmonary complications.

DISCUSSION

In this study, 57.2% of the population had an infection identified during hospitalization. According to published data from a single Brazilian center, the infection rate among a pediatric population undergoing allogeneic and autologous BMT was 58.5%.9 In a multicenter study undertaken in southern and southeastern Brazil, the infection rate was 55%.2 Although these values are similar to ours, the comparison is hampered because we studied patients undergoing autologous BMT alone.

Studies in other countries on patients undergoing autologous BMT have indicated infection rates ranging from 27.6% to 48.2%,10,11 i.e. lower than the rate that we found. Although not statistically significant, there was a difference in the occurrence of infection in relation to the first years covered by this study. This might be accounted for by the little experience of managing autologous BMT patients that existed in those early days, which may have led to infection rates that were higher than those in the literature.

In disagreement with the literature,5,12,13 age was not associated with the risk of infection in our study. This finding was possibly due to the small number of children in our sample.

In agreement with the findings of Poutsiaka et al.,14 the length of the neutropenia period was not significantly associated with higher rates of infectious complications in our study. The same was observed in the study by Ninin et al.,15 in which patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic BMT had similar infection rates.

Although not statistically significant, multiple myeloma patients had the lowest infection rates, a finding that is similar to the data reported by Meyer et al.16 According to Gil et al.,10 acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing autologous BMT have the highest risk of infection, since they remain neutropenic for longer periods. In our study, there was no association between the conditioning regimen and infection.

The most common infection source was the catheter (34.1%). Our data were very close to those of Nucci and Maiolino,2 who reported a catheter-related infection rate of 38% in their patients. The associated factors may include: handling frequency, insertion site, contamination during insertion, skin colonization around the insertion site, contamination of the connection device between the infusion system and vascular access, contamination of the infusion fluid, contamination of solutions used to ensure catheter permeability and presence of distant infectious sites with hematogenic spread of infection.4,8

We also made this observation, such that patients with mucositis of grades III and IV had higher infection rates.

Infection-related pulmonary complications have been considered to be important determiners of morbidity and mortality. According to Meyer et al.,16 pneumonia was the second most frequent cause of infection in these patients, occurring in 7.8% of the cases. According to Dettenkofer et al.,6 pneumonia is the most frequent infection in patients undergoing autologous BMT.

Three patients had oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This microorganism increases the infection-related mortality rate of grafted patients, and has been isolated with higher frequency, in different places, over the past few years.17 No vancomycin-resistant microorganism was isolated in our study.

In accordance with the Brazilian and foreign literature, Gram-positive bacteria were the most frequent isolates in our study. Nonetheless, a significant increase in the number of infections due to Gram-negative bacteria has been reported over the past few years.1,7,12,18,19,20,21 This may be accounted for by greater use of prophylactic antimicrobials, chiefly quinolones.22

According to Laws et al.,19 Gram-negative bacterial infections are more severe and cause higher death rates, compared with Gram-positive bacterial infections. This may be explained by their greater virulence and resistance, and the latter is also due to their double cell membrane, which blocks the entry of some drugs.23

The most frequent isolate in our study was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, in agreement with findings from different BMT centers.6,15,16,19,24,25 Until recently, these bacteria were considered contaminants, devoid of serious clinical importance.26 However, over the past few years, they have been acknowledged as important infectious agents. Catheters are the main means of entry for these microorganisms.26

Fungi were the second most frequently identified microorganisms in the infections we found. The main isolate was Candida albicans, and its presence was associated with mucositis. In autologous BMT, the likelihood of systemic candidiasis is very low, and occurs chiefly after the neutropenia period has resolved, or in the absence of mucositis.27

Similarly to findings from other centers,2,8,11,14infection was the main cause of death in our patients during hospitalization. It seemed to contribute towards longer hospital stay, although this association did not present statistical significance (P = 0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

The infection rate found among patients undergoing BMT was high (57.2%), and the main source was the catheter (34.1%). We believe that continuing training programs and basic preventive measures, targeted to reduce infectious complications during the hospitalization of patients undergoing BMT, are paramount. Further studies are necessary before more effective measures to protect this infection-prone population can be implemented.

University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Sources of funding: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Naoum FA, Martins LTV, Castro NS, Barros JC, Chiattone CS. Perfil microbiológico dos pacientes nos primeiros trinta dias pós transplante de medula óssea do Serviço de Transplantes da Santa Casa de São Paulo [Microbiological profile of patients in the first thirty days post bone marrow transplantation of the Transplantation Service in Santa Casa, São Paulo] Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2002;24(2):91–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nucci M, Maiolino A. Medicina. 3. Vol. 33. Ribeirão Preto: 2000. Infecções em transplante de medula óssea. [Infection in bone marrow transplant recipients] pp. 278–293. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bueno ND, Saboya R, Martins MC, et al. O transplante de medula óssea na leucemia mielóide aguda: análise de 80 pacientes transplantados no complexo do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo [The allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of 80 patients - Bone Marrow Transplantation Service - Hospital das Clínicas of the Medical School, University of São Paulo] Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2004;26(2):84–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dykewicz CA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) Infectious Diseases Society of America. American Society of Blood. Marrow Transplantation Summary of the Guidelines for Preventing Opportunistic Infections among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(2):139–144. doi: 10.1086/321805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mackall C, Fry T, Gress R, et al. Background to hematopoietic cell transplantation, including post transplant immune recovery. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44(8):457–462. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dettenkofer M, Wenzler-Röttele S, Babikir R, et al. Surveillance of nosocomial sepsis and pneumonia in patients with a bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplant: a multicenter project. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(7):926–931. doi: 10.1086/428046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, et al. 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(6):730–751. doi: 10.1086/339215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infectious Diseases Society of America. American Society of Blood. Marrow Transplantation Guidelines for preventing opportunistic infections among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2000;49(10):1–125. CE1-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Castro CG, Júnior, Gregianin LJ, Brunetto AL. J Pediatr. 5. Vol. 79. Rio J: 2003. Análise clínica e epidemiológica do transplante de medula óssea em um serviço de oncologia pediátrica [Clinical and epidemiological analysis of bone marrow transplantation in a pediatric oncology unit] pp. 413–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gil L, Styczynski J, Komarnicki M. Infectious complication in 314 patients after high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors analysis and outcome. Infection. 2007;35(6):421–427. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-6350-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reich G, Mapara MY, Reichardt P, Dörken B, Maschmeyer G. Infections complications after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: comparison between patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma and patients with solid tumors. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;27(5):525–529. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bailey LC, Reilly AF, Rheingold SR. Infections in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. Semin Hematol. 2009;46(3):313–324. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mendes AVA, Sapolnik R, Mendonça N. J Pediatr. 2, supl. Vol. 83. Rio J: 2007. Novas diretrizes na abordagem clínica da neutropenia febril e da sepse em oncologia pediátrica [New guidelines for the clinical management of febrile neutropenia and sepsis in pediatric oncology patients] pp. 54–S63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poutsiaka DD, Price LL, Ucuzian A, et al. Blood stream infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with increased mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;40(1):63–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ninin E, Milpied N, Moreau P, et al. Longitudinal study of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections in adult recipients of bone marrow transplants. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(1):41–47. doi: 10.1086/320871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meyer E, Beyersmann J, Bertz H, et al. Risk factor analysis of blood stream infection and pneumonia in neutropenic patients after peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(3):173–178. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shaw BE, Boswell T, Byrne JL, Yates C, Russell NH. Clinical impact of MRSA in a stem cell transplant unit: analysis before, during and after an MRSA outbreak. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(10):623–629. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oliveira AL, de Souza M, Carvalho-Dias VM, et al. Epidemiology of bacteremia and factors associated with multi-drug-resistant gram-negative bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(12):775–781. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laws HJ, Kobbe G, Dilloo D, et al. Surveillance of nosocomial infections in paediatric recipients of bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation during neutropenia, compared with adult recipients. J Hosp Infect. 2006;62(1):80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moura MEB, Campelo SMA, Brito FCP, et al. Infecção hospitalar: estudo de prevalência em um hospital público de ensino [Nosocomial infection: study of prevalence at a public teaching hospital] Rev Bras Enferm. 2007;60(4):416–421. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672007000400011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Walsh T.J. Advances and challenges in infectious diseases supportive care of patients with hematologic malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and severe aplastic anemia. Semin Hematol. 2009;46(3):191–197. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cattaneo C, Quaresmini G, Casari S, et al. Recent changes in bacterial epidemiology and the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli among patients with haematological malignancies: results of a prospective study on 823 patients at a single institution. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(3):721–728. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alterthun F. Morfologia e estrutura da célula bacteriana. In: Trabulsi LR, Alterthun F, editors. Microbiologia. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2008. pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Celebi H, Akan H, Akcaglayan E, Ustun C, Arat M. Febrile neutropenia in allogeneic and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and conventional chemotherapy for malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;26(2):211–214. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Toor AA, van Burik JA, Weisdorf DJ. Infections during mobilizing chemotherapy and following autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Tranplant. 2001;28(12):1129–1134. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bueris V, Moreira CG, Teixeira LM, Santos KRN, Trabulsi LR. Staphylococcus epidermidis e outras espécies de Staphylococcus, micrococcus e Rothia (Stomatococcus) In: Trabulsi LR, Alterthum F, editors. Microbiologia. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2008. pp. 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marr KA, Bow E, Chiller T, et al. Fungal infection prevention after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44(8):483–487. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from São Paulo Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Associação Paulista de Medicina

RESOURCES