Skip to main content
Thieme Open Access logoLink to Thieme Open Access
. 2024 Mar 1;56(Suppl 1):E205–E206. doi: 10.1055/a-2261-7919

Repeat endoscopic intermuscular dissection of the visible scar after noncurative endoscopic intermuscular dissection of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor

Elena De Cristofaro 1, Jérôme Rivory 2, Louis Jean Masgnaux 2, Timothée Wallenhorst 3, Jérémie Jacques 4, Pierre Lafeuille 2, Mathieu Pioche 2,
PMCID: PMC10907126  PMID: 38428913

Endoscopic resection with advanced techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection is the first-line treatment for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) 1 . When initial resection is not curative (R0), systematic rectal revision seems relevant in order to remove the scar 2 . Recently, endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) has been described for increasing the deep resection margin and R0 rate 3 4 .

In this case we report the benefits of EID for removing the scar after a previous EID for rectal NET.

A 66-year-old patient was referred to our center for removal of a suspected rectal NET ( Video 1 ). An EID was indicated to optimize the deep resection margin. After circumferential incision and trimming, an incision of the circular muscular layer was performed, with longitudinal muscular layer exposure. We placed an adaptive traction device (A-TRACT 2; Hospices Civils de Lyon, France) to improve the exposure of the intermuscular plane. After cutting three-quarters of the lesion, proper traction was re-established by tightening the A-TRACT, and the resection was performed without damage to the longitudinal muscular layer ( Fig. 1 a,b ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Endoscopy images for resection of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) using endoscopic intermuscular dissection. a The rectal NET. b Exposure of the intermuscular plane with the A-TRACT strategy. c The scar of the resected NET. d Exposure of the intermuscular plane with the double-clip traction strategy.

Download video file (102.1MB, mp4)

Repeat endoscopic intermuscular dissection after noncurative resection with traction strategies.

Video 1

Histopathology showed a grade 1 well-differentiated NET, with deep free margins but minor contact with the lateral edge. For this reason, an endoscopic revision was indicated after 4 months, and a second EID was performed to remove the scar. A double-clip traction with clip on the circular layer was applied to improve the exposure of the intermuscular space ( Fig. 1 c,d ). The procedure was completed in 30 minutes, without adverse events. Histopathology did not reveal residual disease on the scar.

To our knowledge, this is the first described case in which EID was performed after a previous noncurative EID for a rectal NET. The use of traction strategies, especially of a dedicated adaptive traction device such as that used here, could facilitate the intervention, allowing better exposure of the intermuscular plane.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AC

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest J. Rivory, L. J. Masgnaux, J. Jacques, and M. Pioche are co-founders of the ATRACT devices and co. E. De Cristofaro, T. Wallenhorst, and P. Lafeuille declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos .

E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos .

References

  • 1.Deprez PH, Moons LMG, OʼToole D et al. Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Guideline. Endoscopy. 2022;54:412–429. doi: 10.1055/a-1751-5742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Mestier L, Lepage C, Baudin E et al. Digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR) Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52:473–492. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moons LMG, Bastiaansen BAJ, Richir MC et al. Endoscopic intermuscular dissection for deep submucosal invasive cancer in the rectum: a new endoscopic approach. Endoscopy. 2022;54:993–998. doi: 10.1055/a-1748-8573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schaefer M, Albouuys J, Geyl S et al. Endoscopic intermuscular dissection of a residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor with high-pressure injection and double-clip traction. Endoscopy. 2023;55:E1126–E1127. doi: 10.1055/a-2173-7103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endoscopy are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES