Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disease without specific Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. Recent advances suggest that chromatin remodeling and epigenetic alteration contribute to the development of NAFLD. The functions of the corresponding molecular modulator in NAFLD, however, are still elusive. KDM1A, commonly known as lysine-specific histone demethylase 1, has been reported to increase glucose uptake in hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, a recent study suggests that inhibition of KDM1A reduces lipid accumulation in primary brown adipocytes. We here investigated the role of KDM1A, one of the most important histone demethylases, in NAFLD. In this study, we observed a significant upregulation of KDM1A in NAFLD mice, monkeys, and humans compared to the control group. Based on these results, we further found that the KDM1A can exacerbate lipid accumulation and inflammation in hepatocytes and mice. Mechanistically, KDM1A exerted its effects by elevating chromatin accessibility, subsequently promoting the development of NAFLD. Furthermore, the mutation of KDM1A blunted its capability to promote the development of NAFLD. In summary, our study discovered that KDM1A exacerbates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in NAFLD via increasing chromatin accessibility, further indicating the importance of harnessing chromatin remodeling and epigenetic alteration in combating NAFLD. KDM1A might be considered as a potential therapeutic target in this regard.
Supplementary key words: NAFLD, KDM1A, chromatin accessibility, lipid accumulation, inflammation
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a hepatic disorder characterized by the excessive accumulation of hepatic fat in the absence of excessive alcohol consumption or other liver diseases (1, 2). It has emerged as one of the most prevalent chronic liver conditions, affecting approximately 25.24% of the global population (3, 4). More than 25% of NAFLD patients progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a condition associated with a significantly heightened risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and extrahepatic cardiovascular disorders (4, 5, 6). NAFLD is becoming a prominent underlying factor necessitating liver transplantation in cases of advanced liver disease (7, 8). However, there is currently no specific drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for NAFLD. Consequently, there is an urgent need for therapeutic targets and viable therapeutic strategies for NAFLD.
Chromatin remodeling and epigenetic modifications following metabolic stress play a vital role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD (9, 10, 11). Among these modifications, histone methylation, which is tightly regulated by various epigenetic enzymes, has gained significant attention due to its essential role in the progression of NAFLD (9, 12, 13). The functions of the corresponding molecular modulator in NAFLD, however, are still elusive. KDM1A, known as lysine-specific histone demethylase1, specifically removes methylation of H3K4me or H3K9me, causing gene expression repression and activation, respectively (14, 15). KDM1A has been reported to increase the expression levels of inflammatory response genes by acting as a positive regulator in inflammatory diseases such as hepatitis B virus–associated glomerulonephritis and rheumatoid (16, 17). Kdm1a knockdown decreases lipid accumulation in primary brown adipocytes (18). KDM1A has also recently been recognized as a pivotal epigenetic modulator suppressing hepatic mitochondrial respiration (19). However, the functions of KDM1A in NAFLD remain unclear.
In this study, we observed a remarkable upregulation of KDM1A in NAFLD and proved that KDM1A exacerbates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in NAFLD via increasing chromatin accessibility. These findings indicated the importance of harnessing chromatin remodeling and epigenetic alteration in combating NAFLD. KDM1A might be considered as a leading therapeutic target in this regard.
Materials and methods
Animals
In this study, all animal experiments conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. The animal protocols and procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Center for Animal Experiment, Wuhan University.
The hepatocyte-specific Kdm1a-KO (Kdm1a CKO) mice were generated using an AAV8 delivery system. To facilitate Kdm1a CKO mouse generation, specific primers (sg1: 5′-CTAAGTAACTGTGAACTCGG-3′; sg2: 5′- ACCAAGACCTGTTACAACCA-3′; sg3: 5′- AACCTCCAATGCCTGGCCAA-3′) were employed. Briefly, 5 × 1011 vg of AAV8 carrying specific guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences targeting the mouse Kdm1a gene was injected into C57BL/6J-Gt (ROSA)26Sortm1 mice. The sgRNA can work in conjunction with Cas9 nuclease to guide it to target specific genomic loci for DNA double-strand breaks. These mice were procured from the Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University. The AAV8 vector was obtained from Vigenebio (Shandong, China). The tail vein route was selected for AAV8 injection.
To generate Kdm1a-overexpression (Kdm1a-OE) mice, we employed a Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposase system, following the protocol described in previous studies (20, 21). In brief, we introduced a liver-specific pT3 plasmid (pT3-alb-3×flag-m-Kdm1a), carrying the Kdm1a gene, into the mouse livers via tail vein injection. Each mouse received a dosage of 30 μg of the pT3 plasmid carrying the Kdm1a gene, along with 2 μg of the SB100X transposase plasmid. For the control group of mice, we only injected the SB100X transposase plasmid.
Establishment of NAFLD model in mice
To establish a mouse model of NAFLD, male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to a high-fat high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet (fat, 42%; carbohydrates, 44%; protein, 14%; cholesterol, 0.2%; no. TP 26304, Trophic Diet, Nantong, China) for 16 weeks. Mice of the control group were fed with a normal chow diet (10.2% fat, 18.3% protein, and 71.5% carbohydrates; D12450B, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ).
Human liver samples and animal liver samples
Human sample collection was approved by the human research ethics committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. The procedures adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Human liver tissue samples were obtained from individuals who underwent liver biopsy, liver surgery, or liver transplantation at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University or Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University in Wuhan. Samples from patients with hepatic steatosis resulting from viral infection (such as hepatitis B or C virus), drug or toxin-induced injury, excessive alcohol consumption, or autoimmune hepatitis were excluded. The control samples of were collected from normal liver regions of individuals who underwent liver-related surgery and did not exhibit NAFLD or NASH. The NAFLD activity score was assessed independently by two pathologists in a blinded manner, utilizing the NASH-Clinical Research Network scoring system (22). Samples exhibiting an NAFLD activity score of 1–2 without ballooning or fibrosis were classified as simple steatosis, whereas those with an NAFLD activity score greater than four or an NAFLD activity score of 3–4 accompanied by the presence of fibrosis were classified as NASH. Nonsteatotic samples were characterized by an NAFLD activity score of 0. Informed consent was also obtained from all patients and volunteers involved in the study. The main characteristics of patients are shown in Supplemental Table S1. Cynomolgus monkey models of NAFLD or NASH were established by our group. For this study, liver biopsy tissues obtained from these primate models were utilized. All the protocols and procedures involving the monkeys had been approved by the Forestry Department of Hubei Province in China and strictly adhered to the laws and regulations of the People's Republic of China. In addition to the primate models, mouse liver tissues from models induced by a HFHC diet were also incorporated into our study.
Hepatic lipid and serum biochemistry analyses
The hepatic lipid triglyceride (TG) contents were quantified by using commercial TG kits (A110-1-1, Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute) according to the manufacturer’s directions. To assess the lipid content in the plasma and evaluate liver function, the serum levels of TGs, total cholesterol (TC), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were evaluated in the animals. For the analysis, an ADVIA 2400 Chemistry System analyzer (Siemens, Tarrytown, NY) was employed, following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer.
Histological analysis and immunofluorescence staining
Tissues were fixed in a 10% neutral buffered formalin solution and subsequently embedded in paraffin for histological analysis. To visualize the lipid accumulation pattern and inflammatory status, paraffin liver sections were stained with H&E staining. For the detection of lipid droplet accumulation, frozen liver sections prepared in Tissue-Tek OCT compound were stained with Oil Red O (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Liver fibrosis was assessed using picrosirius red staining (Hedebiotechnology, Beijing, China). The histological features of the stained tissues were observed and documented using a light microscope (ECLIPSE 80i, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, for immunofluorescence staining, paraffin liver sections were labeled overnight with an anti-CD11b polyclonal antibody (BM3925, Boster, Wuhan, China) at a dilution of 1:800. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with a suitable secondary antibody conjugated with a fluorophore (1:200 dilution) for 1 h. The immunofluorescence images were captured using a Nikon fluorescence microscope (ECLIPSE 80i).
Primary cell isolation and cell culture
To obtain murine primary hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, a two-step collagenase perfusion method was used. Primary hepatocytes and Kupffer cells were isolated from male C57BL/6J mice aged 6–8 weeks. Additionally, primary hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) were isolated from male C57BL/6J mice aged 16 weeks. Briefly, under anesthesia, the mice were perfused twice with liver perfusion medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA; catalog no.: 17701-038), followed by liver digestion medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific; catalog no.: 17701-034) through the liver portal vein. The liver tissue was excised, minced, and subsequently filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer. The resulting mixture was then subjected to centrifugation at 50 g for 5 min to separate the Kupffer cells (top aqueous phase) with the primary hepatocytes (the cell pellet). The aqueous phase was further subjected to purification using a 50% Percoll solution (17-0891-01; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) to obtain a highly purified population of Kupffer cells. In the case of HSCs, the cell suspension was centrifuged at 580 g and subsequently enriched using a 29% Nycodenz density gradient centrifugation method to achieve further enrichment. The isolated primary hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and HSCs were cultured using DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Huh7 cells and HEK293T (type culture collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (catalog no.: F05-001-B160216; Bio-One Biotechnology, Guangzhou) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (catalog no.: 15140-122; Gibco). The cells were cultured in a controlled environment consisting of a 5% CO2 incubator maintained at 37°C.
Generation of KO cell lines
Two sgRNAs were designed to target the human KDM1A genes and subsequently cloned into the lenti-CRISPRv2 plasmid. The constructed plasmid was used to generate the Cas9/sgRNA-producing lentivirus. The primer sequences used for constructing sgRNA-expressing plasmid were as follows (sg1:5′-GACTTCAAGACGACAGTTCTGG-3′ sg2:5′-TAAATAACTGTGAACTCGGTGG-3′). To generate lentivirus, the sgRNA-expressing plasmids, along with the packaging plasmids pMD2.G and psPAX2, were transfected into HEK293T cells. After 48 h of transfection, the lentivirus was obtained from the supernatant. The harvested cell culture supernatants underwent filtration using a 0.45-μm pore size membrane to remove cellular debris and contaminants. Subsequently, the filtered supernatants were subjected to ultracentrifugation for concentration, and the resulting concentrated viral particles were stored at −80°C until use. Then, the Huh7 cells were transduced with lentiviral supernatants, and three days posttransduction, puromycin was employed to select positive cells. Single cells were placed in wells of a 96-well plate separately to facilitate the growth of cell clones in the presence of puromycin for a duration of two weeks and then transferred to 24-well plates for another two weeks. Cell clones with the desired gene knockout were verified via Western blot (WB) analysis using the indicated antibodies and further confirmed by sequencing.
Cellular BODIPY staining
Palmitic acid (P0500; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and oleic acid (O-1008; Sigma–Aldrich) were used to induce stimulation and construct an in vitro cell model of NAFLD, as previously reported (23). For the control group, fatty acid–free BSA (0.5%; BAH66-0100; Equitech Bio, Kerrville, TX) was used. To visualize lipid droplets, cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with BODIPY (D3922-10 mg; 1 μM in PBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for a duration of 3 min at room temperature. The cell nuclei were stained utilizing 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining. BODIPY images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (TCS SP8; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
Cell viability assays
Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay kit, following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. In brief, huh7 hepatocytes were seeded at a density of 5,000 cells per well in 96-well plates. In brief, huh7 hepatocytes were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 cells per well and treated with CC-90011 at concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 20 μM or DMSO for 24 h. Following the treatment, cell counting was performed using Cell Counting Kit-8 (#B34304; Bimake; TX). The absorbance at 450 nm was measured for each well to estimate the number of viable cells.
WB assay
For WB analysis, total protein was extracted from cultured cells and liver tissue samples using RIPA lysis buffer mixed with protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche; 04693132001). The protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific; catalog no.: 23225). The protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore; catalog no.: IPVH00010), and blocked with 5% skim milk for 60 min at room temperature. Then, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies, followed by incubation with the corresponding secondary antibodies. Imaging was performed using a ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The antibodies used are detailed in Supplemental Table S2.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR
Total RNA from cultured cells and tissues was isolated using TRIzol reagent (catalog no.: T9424; Sigma-Aldrich), and gene expression was quantified by real-time PCR using a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics, Inc, Basel, BS, Switzerland), following the manufacturer’s protocols. The relative expression levels of the target genes were normalized to the β-actin. The primers utilized for quantitative RT-PCR are listed in Supplemental Table S3.
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
H293T cells were seeded in 24-well plates culture dishes. Afterward, H293T cells were cotransfected with pGL3-KDM1A promoter-luciferase plasmid, pRL-TK promoter luciferase reporter plasmid (Renilla luciferase), and PHAGE-Flag-C/EBP-β. The primers in the KDM1A-promoter construct used for the luciferase reporting assay are listed in Supplemental Table S4. Then, the cells were lysed and subjected to a luciferase activity assay using the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay system (GloMax 20/20 Luminometer; Promega).
Plasmid constructs
The PHAGE-Flag vector was used for the cloning of the full-length region of the human KDM1A, HNF4α, C/EBP-α, C/EBP-β gene. Expression plasmid containing mutant KDM1A gene was generated using established molecular biology methods. Human C/EBP-β knockdown plasmids were constructed by inserting shRNAtargeting C/EBP-β genes into the pLKO.1 lentiviral vector. The primers used for plasmid construction can be found in the Supplemental Table S4.
Lentivirus and AAV production and infection
For the generation of recombinant lentiviruses, H293T cells were cotransfected with the lentiviral vector of interest and the helper plasmids psPAX2 and pMD2.G. Following a 48-h incubation period posttransfection, virus particles were filtered from the cell supernatant through a 0.45-μm filter (SLHV033RB; Millipore) and then used to infect 293T cells in the presence of 10 μg/ml polybrene. After puromycin screening, stably expressed cells were obtained and verified by WB. The AAV8 delivery system was employed to induce Kdm1a knockout in the liver of mice. For in vivo experiments, a dose of 5 × 1011 vg of AAV8 containing sgRNA sequences specifically targeting the mouse Kdm1a gene (obtained from Vigenebio, Shandong, China) was intravenously injected into the mice through the tail vein. The efficacy of gene knockout was assessed by performing WB analysis.
RNA-sequencing and data analysis
The quality assessment of the extracted RNA samples was performed by using the RNA 6000 Nano kit (#5067-1511, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA), following the extraction procedure that utilized TRIzol reagent (#T9424, Sigma-Aldrich). For library preparation, the MGIEasy RNA Library Prep Kit (#1000006384, MGI Tech Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China) was used. For the analysis of the obtained data, we used HISAT2 software (version 2.21) to align the clean reads against the Ensembl mouse genomes (mm10 or GRCm38). The resulting alignments were then converted to Binary Alignment Map format using SAMtools (version 1.4). To quantify the expression levels of the identified genes, we employed StringTie (version 1.3.3b) to calculate the fragments per kilobase per million and read counts. Subsequently, the obtained read counts were input into DESeq2 to determine differential gene expression and assess the associated statistical significance. Differentially expressed genes were identified as those with |log2 (fold change) |≥ log2(1.5) and an adjusted P value < 0.05. In addition, gene set variation analysis analysis was performed by using the gene set variation analysis R package (v1.40.1) to evaluate the variation in pathway activity across different conditions. Statistical significance was determined for gene sets with P values < 0.05.
Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing
Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) was conducted following established protocols using fresh liver tissues (19). The Bowtie2 alignment software was employed in this analysis. Prior to the alignment, the raw data obtained from sequencing was subjected to adapter trimming. The clean data was aligned to the mm10_UCSC reference genome using Bowtie2. The fragment size of the BAM files was calculated using the R package ATAC-seqQC. The uniquely mapped reads from the generated BAM files were used to call peaks using the macs2 software, with a significance threshold set at P value < 0.05. Subsequently, deeptools was used to compute signal distribution plots and heatmaps near genes. Differential peak analysis was performed using the R package DiffBind, followed by motif analysis using Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation-Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, and downstream gene prediction using MEME-Find Individual Motif Occurrences.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was conducted using SPSS v26, and the results are presented as means ± SEM. Differences between two groups with parametric data were evaluated using a Student’s t test, while a one-way ANOVA was employed for parametric data involving multiple comparisons. Post hoc tests, such as Bonferroni’s or Tamhane’s T2 (M), were performed to analyze significant findings, depending on the homogeneity of variance. In the case of skewed distribution, the Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used for two and multiple-group comparisons, respectively. Statistical significance was defined as a P value < 0.05.
Results
KDM1A expression is upregulated in NAFLD and correlates with the progression of NAFLD
To elucidate the association between NAFLD and KDM1A, we firstly determined the KDM1A level in patients and found significant upregulation of KDM1A expression in both mRNA and protein levels in the liver tissues of patients with NAFL/NASH (Fig. 1A). The same result was also observed in liver samples of in HFHC diet–induced monkeys and mice relative to the control groups and the upregulation level of Kdm1a increased with the progression of NAFLD (Fig. 1B, C). In primary hepatocytes, we also found that the Kdm1a mRNA and protein expression were markedly elevated in primary hepatocytes challenged with palmitic acid and oleic acid (PO) (Fig. 1D). Furthermore, the expression level of Kdm1a increased with the prolongation of PO stimulation time. Remarkably, the mRNA and protein levels of Kdm1a did not increase in Kupffer cells or HSCs (Fig. 1E, F). This result indicated that the observed elevation in Kdm1a expression was predominantly attributed to hepatocytes rather than Kupffer cells or HSCs. To investigate the possible mechanism by which palmitate activates KDM1A, we integrated the prediction of KDM1A promoter-binding transcription factors (TFs) (24, 25, 26). Among these TFs, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and HNF4α were NAFLD metabolism-related TFs (Supplemental Fig. S1A). We observed that C/EBPβ markedly increased the promotor activity of KDM1A and KDM1A mRNA levels (Supplemental Fig. S1B, C). In addition, C/EBPβ inhibition significantly decreased the mRNA level of KDM1A (Supplemental Fig. S1D, E). Collectively, these findings suggested that C/EBPβ was the upstream regulator of KDM1A and palmitate activated KDM1A through upregulating C/EBPβ.
Fig. 1.
KDM1A is closely related to the progression of NAFLD. A: Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Western blot analysis of KDM1A expression in the livers of non-NAFL, NAFL, and NASH individuals of humans (n = 4). B and C: The mRNA and protein level of Kdm1a in the liver tissues from non-NAFL, NAFL, and NASH mice and monkeys. D–F: Representative qPCR and Western blot analysis of Kdm1a expression in mouse primary hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and hepatic stellate cells stimulated with 0.5 mM/1 mM palmitic acid/oil acid (PO), 10 ng/ml TNF-α, or 20 ng/ml transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in a time-dependent manner. n = 3 independent biological replicates. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA statistics was applied for statistical analysis. NAFL, nonalcoholic fatty liver; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
KDM1A promotes lipid accumulation and inflammation in hepatocytes
Given the close correlation between KDM1A and the progression of NAFLD, we further examined the functions of KDM1A in vitro and found a significant increase in lipid accumulation induced by PO in hepatocytes overexpressing KDM1A (Fig. 2A, B). Consistent with these findings, we observed a significant upregulation of MCP1, TNFα, CXCL10, CCL2, FASN, ACCα, CD36, and SCD1 in hepatocytes overexpressing KDM1A (Fig. 2C, D). Conversely, the depletion of KDM1A reduced lipid droplet accumulation within hepatocytes following PO stimulation (Fig. 2E, F). And KDM1A depletion reduced mRNA expression levels for MCP1, TNFα, CXCL10, CCL2, FASN, ACCα, CD36, and SCD1 (Fig. 2G, H). Taken together, these findings suggest that KDM1A can promote lipid accumulation and inflammation in hepatocytes.
Fig. 2.
KDM1A accelerates hepatocyte lipid and inflammation disorder. A and B: Representative images (A) of BODIPY staining and quantification (B) of lipid droplets in cultured WT/(KDM1A-OE) Huh7 cells challenged with BSA or PO for 12 h under the indicated conditions. n = 3 independent biological replicates. Scale bar 25 μm. C: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with inflammation in cultured WT/KDM1A-overexpression (KDM1A-OE) Huh7 cells stimulated with BSA or PO at the indicated concentrations for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. D: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with fatty acid uptake and fatty acid synthesis in cultured WT/KDM1A-OE Huh7 cells stimulated with BSA or PO at the indicated concentrations for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. E and F: Representative images (E) of BODIPY staining and quantification (F) of lipid droplets in cultured WT/(KDM1A-KO) Huh7 cells challenged with BSA or PO for 12 h under the indicated conditions. n = 3 independent biological replicates. Scale bar 25 μm. G: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with inflammation in cultured WT/KDM1A-KO (KDM1A-KO) Huh7 cells stimulated with BSA or PO at the indicated concentrations for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. H: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with fatty acid uptake and fatty acid synthesis in cultured WT/(KDM1A-KO) Huh7 cells stimulated with BSA or PO at the indicated concentrations for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA statistics was applied for statistical analysis. PO, palmitic acid and oleic acid.
Hepatocyte-specific Kdm1a ablation alleviates HFHC diet–induced NAFLD in mice
Based on the vital role of Kdm1a in NAFLD models in vitro, we generated Kdm1a CKO mice to explore the function of Kdm1a in vivo (Fig. 3A). We subjected the Kdm1a CKO mice together with the controls to either a normal chow or HFHC diet for a duration of 16 weeks to make controls or induce NAFLD (Fig. 3B). Moreover, we validated the successful knockout of Kdm1a specifically in the liver (Fig. 3C). After 16 weeks of HFHC feeding, the Kdm1a-deficient mice exhibited lower body weight, liver weight, and liver weight/body weight ratios than the control mice (Fig. 3D). Meanwhile, the levels of liver injury markers, including ALT and aspartate AST, the levels of liver TG as well as serum TC and TG concentrations, were markedly reduced in the Kdm1a CKO group (Fig. 3E, F, Supplemental Fig. S2A). Moreover, Kdm1a deficiency led to a substantial reduction in the accumulation of hepatic lipid droplets and significantly mitigated inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis (Fig. 3G, H). Upon performing a comprehensive global transcriptome analysis of HFHC-fed mouse livers, we discovered that pathways related to lipid metabolism, glycometabolism, and inflammation were repressed in Kdm1a CKO mice (Fig. 3I). Correspondingly, the expression of key genes implicated in these pathways associated with lipid metabolism, glycometabolism, and inflammation was also suppressed in the Kdm1a CKO group (Fig. 3J). In Kdm1a CKO group, we observed an improvement in lipid metabolism, primarily attributed to the downregulation of genes related to lipid biosynthesis and uptake (Supplemental Fig. S3A, B). However, the expression of genes related to lipid degradation remained unchanged (Supplemental Fig. S3C). In addition, our research findings also indicated that Kdm1a CKO mice showed a significant decrease in the expression levels of genes involved in gluconeogenesis compared to the control group (Supplemental Fig. S4A).
Fig. 3.
Deletion of Kdm1a improves HFHC-induced NAFLD in mice. A: Schematic diagram for generating hepatocyte-specific Kdm1a-KO (Kdm1a CKO) mice. B: The strategy of the experimental procedure for the HFHC-induced NAFLD model and evaluating the Kdm1a function in vivo. C: Representative Western blot images of the Kdm1a protein expression at the 16th week. n = 6 mice per group. D: Body weight, liver weight, and the ratio of liver weight to body weight (LW/BW) of HFHC-fed mice in the indicated groups. n = 6 mice per group. E: Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) activity of HFHC-fed mice were shown in the indicated groups. n = 6 mice per group. F: Serum total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) concentrations of HFHC-fed mice are shown in the indicated groups. n = 6 mice per group. G and H: Representative images (G) of the indicated mouse liver sections stained with H&E, oil red O, picrosirius red (PSR), and immunofluorescence for CD11b-positive cells. n = 6 mice per group. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantitative analysis of oil red O, PSR, and CD11b data is shown in (H). n = 6 mice per group. I: Enrichment of Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) pathways related to lipid metabolism, glycometabolism, and inflammation. n = 3 mice per group. J: Heatmap of gene expression profiles involved in lipid metabolism, glycometabolism, and inflammation. n = 3 mice per group. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA statistics was applied in (D, H). Student's t test was applied in (E, F). HFHC, high-fat high-cholesterol; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PSR, picrosirius red.
Overexpression of Kdm1a exacerbates HFHC diet-induced NAFLD in mice
We next generated the Kdm1a-OE mice to further elucidate the crucial role of Kdm1a in NAFLD (Fig. 4A). The mice were subjected to a HFHC diet for a duration of 16 weeks to establish the NAFLD model (Fig. 4B). The successful overexpression of Kdm1a in the mouse liver was also confirmed (Fig. 4C). The Kdm1a-OE mice exhibited significantly higher liver weight, body weight, and liver weight-to-body weight ratio than the control group (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, there was a significant increase in AST, ALT, TC, and TG levels in Kdm1a-OE mice (Fig. 4E, F, Supplemental Fig. S2B). The overexpression of Kdm1a exacerbated hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis induced by a HFHC diet (Fig. 4G, H). Consistent with these phenotypic alterations, Kdm1a overexpression resulted in a significant upregulation of key genes involved in lipid metabolism, glycometabolism, and inflammatory response (Fig. 4I, Supplemental Fig. S4B). These findings demonstrated that Kdm1a exacerbated hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and glucose disturbances in mice.
Fig. 4.
Overexpression of Kdm1a aggravates HFHC-induced NAFLD in mice. A: Experimental schematic for generating Kdm1a-OE mice. B: Schematic showing HFHC-induced NAFLD and evaluation of the function of Kdm1a. C: Western blot analysis of the Kdm1a protein expression at the 20th week. n = 6 mice per group. D: Body weight, liver weight, and LW/BW of HFHC-fed mice in the indicated groups. n = 6 mice per group. E: Serum ALT and AST activity of HFHC-fed mice are shown in the indicated groups. n = 6 mice per group. F: Serum TC and TG levels of HFHC-fed mice are shown in the indicated groups. n = 6 mice per group. G and H: Representative images (G) of H&E, oil red O, PSR-stained liver sections, and Immunofluorescence for CD11b-positive cells. n = 6 mice per group. Scale bar, 50 μm. Quantitative analysis of oil red O, PSR, and CD11b data is shown in (H). n = 6 mice per group. I: Relative mRNA levels of genes related to inflammatory response, glycometabolism, and lipid metabolism in the livers of HFHC diet–fed mice with or without Kdm1a-OE. n = 6 mice per group. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA statistics was applied in (D, H). Student's t test and Mann–Whitney U test were applied in (E, F, I). ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HFHC, high-fat high-cholesterol; Kdm1a-OE, Kdm1a-overexpression; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PSR, picrosirius red.
Kdm1a deficiency downregulates the genes associated with NAFLD by decreasing chromatin accessibility
Histone demethylase KDM1A has been reported to affect chromosome accessibility (27, 28). Therefore, to explore the potential mechanism underlying the critical roles of KDM1A in NAFLD, ATAC-seq was performed on liver samples of WT and Kdm1a CKO mice (Fig. 5A). The chromatin accessibility fragments of WT and Kdm1a CKO groups showed mainly a mononucleosome peak (Fig. 5B). The accessibility of the transcription start site was significantly enriched in both WT and Kdm1a CKO groups (Fig. 5C). These results showed that high-resolution chromatin accessibility and good quality of ATAC-seq were obtained from liver tissue samples of WT and Kdm1a CKO mice. The proportion of promoter regions was less than 25%, while the proportion of intron and distal intergenic was more than 50% in both WT and Kdm1a CKO groups (Fig. 5D). Moreover, the chromatin accessibility of the Kdm1a CKO group was decreased compared to the WT group at the transcription start site (Fig. 5E). Genes around differentially accessible regions were closely associated with glycometabolism, lipid metabolism, and inflammation in both WT and Kdm1a CKO groups (Fig. 5F, G).
Fig. 5.
Chromatin accessibility landscape of WT and CKO groups. A: Schematic overview of ATAC-seq procedure. B: The insert size distribution of ATAC-seq profiles in WT and Kdm1a-CKO mice. C: Chromatin accessibility around the transcription start site (TSS) in WT and Kdm1a-CKO mice. D: Distribution of peaks in each sample. E: Average plots (top) and heatmaps (bottom) of differentially accessible regions (DARs) in WT and Kdm1a-CKO groups. Average plot showing global chromatin accessibility changes across the center and surrounding regions (±3 kb). The heatmap represents the average normalized ATAC-seq counts for DARs. Each row represents one DAR. F: Functional enrichment of gene ontology (GO) terms for genes associated with peaks in the WT versus Kdm1a CKO groups. G: The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation for the genes associated with peaks in the WT versus Kdm1a CKO groups. ATAC-seq, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing; Kdm1a-CKO, hepatocyte-specific Kdm1a-KO.
The 10 most enriched TF motifs in the Kdm1a CKO and WT groups are shown (Fig. 6A). The 10 TF motifs were associated with inflammation, lipid metabolism, and glucose metabolism. We next confirmed the target genes related to inflammation, lipid metabolism, and glucose metabolism for the top 10 identified TFs (Fig. 6B). Compared with the WT group, these target genes were around the low openness regions in the Kdm1a CKO group. These ATAC-seq results were consistent with the RNA-sequencing results in the Fig. 3J. Remarkably, the TF Pparγ had the highest number of target genes located in low openness regions, whether in terms of lipid metabolism, inflammation, or glucose metabolism (Fig. 6C–E). In addition, we observed a higher correlation between Pparγ and ATAC-seq than the TF Klf15 (Supplemental Fig. S5A, B). Overall, our findings indicated that Kdm1a participates in the development of NAFLD by increasing chromosome accessibility (Fig. 6F).
Fig. 6.
Kdm1a deficiency downregulates the genes related to NAFLD. A: Motif-enrichment analysis of differentially accessible sites in the WT versus Kdm1a CKO groups and motifs of the top 10 transcription factors are shown. B: The target genes of transcription factors, these target genes associated with inflammation, lipid metabolism, and glucose metabolism. C–E: Transcription factors were ranked based on the number of target genes associated with (C) lipid metabolism, (D) inflammation, and (E) glycometabolism. F: Schematic showing the mechanism that Kdm1a contributes to the progression of NAFLD by increasing chromatin accessibility. Kdm1a-CKO, hepatocyte-specific Kdm1a-KO; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
The effect of KDM1A on NAFLD depends on its enzyme activity
Given that the demethylase activity of KDM1A is vital for its participating in various diseases such as lung adenocarcinoma and acute myeloid leukemia, we sought to investigate whether the enzymatic activity of KDM1A is indispensable for its pivotal role in the development of NAFLD (29, 30, 31, 32). Previous studies have reported that the mutant form of KDM1A (K661A) lacks the ability to demethylate histone H3 lysine 4 (33). We also confirmed that the K661A indeed lost catalytic activity (Fig. 7A, B). In KDM1A-KO cells, the re-expression of the K661A did not significantly restore the lipid accumulation induced by PO in hepatocytes compared to KDM1A-KO hepatocyte controls (Fig. 7C, D). Moreover, we observed no significant changes in the mRNA expression levels of MCP1, TNFα, CXCL10, CCL2, FASN, ACCα, CD36, and SCD1 in KDM1A-knockout hepatocytes transfected with the mutant KDM1A (Fig. 7E, F).
Fig. 7.
The enzyme activity of KDM1A is necessary for affecting NAFLD. A: Western blot image showing KDM1A protein expression levels in KDM1A-KO Hun7 hepatocytes transfected with empty vector or K661A plasmids. B: Histone demethylase activity was analyzed by anti-H3K4me2. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. C and D: Representative images (C) of BODIPY staining and quantification (D) of fluorescence in KDM1A-KO hun7 hepatocytes transfected with empty vector or K661A plasmids challenged with BSA or PO for 12 h under the indicated conditions. n = 3 independent biological replicates. Scale bar 25 μm. E: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with inflammatory response in cultured KDM1A-KO hun7 hepatocytes transfected with empty vector or K661A plasmids stimulated with BSA or PO at the indicated concentrations for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. F: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with lipid metabolism in cultured KDM1A-KO hun7 hepatocytes transfected with empty vector or K661A plasmids stimulated with BSA or PO at the indicated concentrations for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA statistics was applied for analysis. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PO, palmitic acid and oleic acid.
The KDM1A inhibitor can alleviate lipid accumulation and inflammation in hepatocytes
We further applied CC-90011, a potent KDM1A enzyme inhibitor, in the cellular model of NAFLD to confirm the enzyme activity of KDM1A is a key factor promoting NAFLD. CC-90011 did not affect cell viability at the highest concentration (20 μM) used in our study (Fig. 8A). CC-90011 indeed inhibited the enzyme activity of KDM1A (Fig. 8B). We found that CC-90011 treatment dose dependently inhibited the increase in lipid accumulation in hepatocytes (Fig. 8C, D). Meanwhile, treatment with CC-90011 markedly reduced the mRNA expression levels of MCP1, TNFα, CXCL10, CCL2, FASN, ACCα, CD36, and SCD1 in hepatocytes stimulated with PO (Fig. 8E, F). Collectively, these findings underscored the crucial role of KDM1A’s enzymatic activity in promoting the development of NAFLD.
Fig. 8.
The KDM1A inhibitor alleviates lipid accumulation and inflammation. A: Relative cell viability of WT hun7 hepatocyte after treatment with different concentrations of CC-90011. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. n.s., no significant difference compared to the 0 μM group. B: Western blot images showing the effect of CC-90011. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. C and D: Representative images (C) of BODIPY staining and quantification (D) of lipid droplets in WT hun7 hepatocyte treated with DMSO+BSA, DMSO+PO, CC-90011 (10 or 20 μM) +PO for 12 h. n = 3 independent biological replicates. Scale bar 25 μm. E: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with inflammation in WT hun7 hepatocytes treated with DMSO+BSA, DMSO+PO, CC-90011 (10 or 20 μM) +PO for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. F: Relative mRNA levels of genes associated with fatty acid uptake and fatty acid synthesis in WT hun7 hepatocytes treated with DMSO+BSA, DMSO+PO, CC-90011 (10 or 20 μM) +PO for 16 h. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments. Values are presented as mean ± SD. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, n.s., not significant; one-way ANOVA statistics was applied for analysis. PO, palmitic acid and oleic acid.
Discussion
NAFLD has become one of the most prevalent chronic liver conditions, affecting more than a quarter of the global population (2, 34). No specific drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, mainly due to the limited understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms of NAFLD. We here discovered that histone demethylase KDM1A exacerbates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in NAFLD via increasing chromatin accessibility, indicating harnessing chromatin remodeling and epigenetic alteration may be a potential way to combat NAFLD. KDM1A itself might be considered as a leading therapeutic target against NAFLD.
Although the pathogenesis of NAFLD has not been fully elucidated, a large number of studies have shown that inflammation, dyslipidemia, and intestinal dysbiosis play a crucial role in the development and progression of NAFLD (35, 36, 37). Furthermore, several significant small molecules regulating inflammation, dyslipidemia, and gut microbiota in NAFLD have been developed as potential drug treatment targets (38, 39, 40). However, the outcomes of the corresponding clinical trials have so far been unsuccessful due to various reasons (40). Accumulating evidence indicates that chromatin remodeling and epigenetic modifications play important regulatory roles in the development of many diseases including NAFLD (9, 11). Our study revealed that increased expression of KDM1A can potentiate hepatic steatosis and inflammation by increasing chromatin accessibility in the genomic regions related to the pathogenesis of NAFLD, further indicating that dynamic changes in chromosomal structure under metabolic stress can lead to the development of NAFLD. Therefore, chromatin remodeling and epigenetic modifications are also crucial pathogenic factors in the development of NAFLD. KDM1A can be considered as a potential therapeutic target for NAFLD.
In this study, we found that Kdm1a deficiency in the context of NAFLD improved hepatic steatosis by primarily inhibiting the expression of lipogenesis and fatty acid uptake genes, such as Scd1, Cd36, Plin2, and Fabp1. Furthermore, Kdm1a deficiency in the context of NAFLD also suppressed the expression of several inflammatory genes, such as Tnfα and interleukin-1β, to ameliorate inflammation. In addition to improving lipid metabolism and inflammation, KDM1A deficiency also led to downregulation of gluconeogenic genes such as G6pase and Fbpase, suggesting that Kdm1a deficiency was also beneficial for glucose homeostasis. Mechanistically, we found that Kdm1a deficiency led to an improvement in hepatic steatosis and inflammation by decreasing the chromatin openness in regions where genes associated with inflammation, lipid metabolism, and glucose metabolism are located. KDM1A belongs to the histone demethylase family. Several members of histone demethylases have been reported to mediate metabolic crosstalk between tissues and organs, thereby playing a pivotal role in the development and progression of NAFLD (13). For instance, plant homeodomain finger 2 protects the liver from the pathogenesis of NAFLD by promoting H3K9me2 demethylation at promoters of carbohydrate responsive element binding protein–regulated genes (41). The histone demethylase KDM7A has been found to promote liver steatosis by upregulating the expression of diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 (42). As the first identified lysine demethylase, the function of KDM1A in NAFLD has never been reported, although the potential role of KDM1A has been explored in various fields. It has been reported that KDM1A can be involved in prostate cancer by increasing chromatin accessibility of the FOXA1 promoter (28). In addition, a study indicated that inhibition of KDM1A caused a global elevation of chromatin accessibility in acute myeloid leukemia cells (43). To determine whether and how KDM1A participates in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, we undertook systemic in vitro and in vivo functional experiments and an analysis employing ATAC-seq exploration. We found that depletion of KDM1A decreased the chromatin openness in genomic regions related to genes associated with inflammation, lipid metabolism, and glucose metabolism. Consequently, KDM1A deficiency ameliorated inflammation and lipid disorders in the liver. This mechanism is different from what we learn from other histone demethylases mentioned above, particularly in the pathogenesis of NAFLD.
It has been reported that KDM1A may have additional biological functions except for the demethylase activity of KDM1A (44). For instance, KDM1A facilitates the degradation of FBXW7 via both proteasomal and lysosomal pathways independent of its demethylase activity (45). Therefore, we determined to explore whether the enzyme activity of KDM1A is crucial for NAFLD. In the present study, we observed that the supplementation of KDM1A-mutant (K661A) in KDM1A-KO hepatocytes showed no significant impact on lipid accumulation and inflammatory response. In line with these results, the administration of KDM1A inhibitor (CC-90011) demonstrated a notable protective effect against NAFLD. These compelling findings provide evidence supporting the notion that the influence of KDM1A on NAFLD is dependent on its enzymatic activity, highlighting its potential as a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of NAFLD.
A notable advantage of considering KDM1A as a therapeutic target for NAFLD is the availability of several targeted inhibitors that have been developed against it. Some of these inhibitors, including CC-90011 and TCP, have even progressed to clinical trials and have exhibited encouraging therapeutic effects in cancers (46, 47). Therefore, considering the good in vivo activity and low toxicity of KDM1A inhibitors, its application in the clinical treatment of NAFLD is promising. It is possible to screen the most effective KDM1A inhibitor in animal models like mice and then move on to clinical trials of NAFLD. Moreover, novel compounds targeting KDM1A have been emerging in recent years. In order to optimize the clinical efficacy of KDM1A inhibitors, we believe that at least a few key aspects should be emphasized, such as extensive safety assessments, the optimal dosage regimen, and a comprehensive evaluation of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of KDM1A inhibitors. Collectively, these may drive the imminent clinical utilization of safe and efficacious KDM1A inhibitors in the management of NAFLD in future.
To further evaluate whether KDM1A could be developed as a drug target against NAFLD, it is indispensable to learn the global function of KDM1A beyond its role in liver. In this regard, constructing and applying universal Kdm1a transgenic or KO mouse models would be necessary. However, previous studies have reported that global Kdm1a deletion is lethal during embryonic development (48, 49). Consequently, our future research endeavors will focus on the global Kdm1a transgenic and inducible KO models.
In conclusion, our study reveals that KDM1A aggravates liver steatosis and inflammation through increasing the accessibility of chromatin, demonstrating that harnessing chromatin remodeling and epigenetic modifications is crucial for managing NAFLD.
Data availability
All data are contained within the manuscript and Supplementary data.
Supplemental data
This article contains supplemental data.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center for Model Animals for providing us with technical assistance.
Author contributions
Z. Y., S. Z., W. Q., D. L., X. C., L. B., H. L., and Z.-G. S. conceptualization; Z. Y., S. Z., W. Q., D. L., X. C., L. B., H. L., and Z.-G. S. methodology; Z. Y, S. Z, X. L., R. S., W. S., W. Q., D. L., Z. C., Y. W., and X. C. investigation; Z. Y. and S. Z. validation; Z. Y, S. Z, X. L., R. S., W. S., W. Q., D. L., Z. C., Y. W., X. C., Y. L., X.-J. Z., L. B., H. L., and Z.-G. S. writing-review and editing; Z. Y, S. Z, W. Q., D. L., X. C., and Y. L. formal analysis; Z. Y, S. Z, W. Q., D. L., X. C., and Y. L. writing-original draft; X.-J. Z., L. B., H. L., and Z.-G. S. supervision; X.-J. Z., L. B., H. L., and Z.-G. S. funding acquisition; Z. Y., S. Z., W. Q., D. L., X. C., and Y. L. resources.
Funding and additional information
This work was supported by grants from Henan Charity Federation Hepatobiliary Fund (GDXZ2022007, Y. L.) the National Science Foundation of China (82270615 and 82000538, L. B.), the Jiangxi Province Thousand Talents Project (jxsq2023101065, L. B.), the Henan Charity Federation-Hepatobiliary Care Fund (GDXZ2022006, L. B.), the Hubei Province Innovation Platform Construction Project (20204201117303072238, H. L.), the National Science Foundation of China (81970364, Z.-G. S.).
Contributor Information
Lan Bai, Email: bailan@gmu.edu.cn.
Hongliang Li, Email: lihl@whu.edu.cn.
Zhi-Gang She, Email: zgshe@whu.edu.cn.
Supplemental data
References
- 1.Abdelmalek M.F. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: another leap forward. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:85–86. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00406-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yu Y., Cai J., She Z., Li H. Insights into the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutics of nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 2019;6 doi: 10.1002/advs.201801585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cotter T.G., Rinella M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2020: the state of the disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1851–1864. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Younossi Z.M., Koenig A.B., Abdelatif D., Fazel Y., Henry L., Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kucukoglu O., Sowa J.P., Mazzolini G.D., Syn W.K., Canbay A. Hepatokines and adipokines in NASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2021;74:442–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kasper P., Martin A., Lang S., Kutting F., Goeser T., Demir M., et al. NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases: a clinical review. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2021;110:921–937. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01709-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pais R., Barritt A.S., Calmus Y., Scatton O., Runge T., Lebray P., et al. NAFLD and liver transplantation: current burden and expected challenges. J. Hepatol. 2016;65:1245–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cai J., Zhang X.J., Li H. Progress and challenges in the prevention and control of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Med. Res. Rev. 2019;39:328–348. doi: 10.1002/med.21515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sodum N., Kumar G., Bojja S.L., Kumar N., Rao C.M. Epigenetics in NAFLD/NASH: targets and therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2021;167 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Del Campo J.A., Gallego-Duran R., Gallego P., Grande L. Genetic and epigenetic regulation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:911. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Qin Y., Grimm S.A., Roberts J.D., Chrysovergis K., Wade P.A. Alterations in promoter interaction landscape and transcriptional network underlying metabolic adaptation to diet. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:962. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14796-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lim H.J., Kim M. EZH2 as a potential target for NAFLD therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8617. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu Y., Chen M. Histone methylation regulation as a potential target for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2023;24:465–476. doi: 10.2174/1389203724666230526155643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shi Y., Lan F., Matson C., Mulligan P., Whetstine J.R., Cole P.A., et al. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell. 2004;119:941–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Perillo B., Ombra M.N., Bertoni A., Cuozzo C., Sacchetti S., Sasso A., et al. DNA oxidation as triggered by H3K9me2 demethylation drives estrogen-induced gene expression. Science. 2008;319:202–206. doi: 10.1126/science.1147674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abdulla A., Zhang Y., Hsu F.N., Xiaoli A.M., Zhao X., Yang E.S., et al. Regulation of lipogenic gene expression by lysine-specific histone demethylase-1 (LSD1) J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:29937–29947. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.573659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Duteil D., Tosic M., Lausecker F., Nenseth H.Z., Muller J.M., Urban S., et al. Lsd1 ablation triggers metabolic reprogramming of Brown Adipose tissue. Cell Rep. 2016;17:1008–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sambeat A., Gulyaeva O., Dempersmier J., Tharp K.M., Stahl A., Paul S.M., et al. LSD1 Interacts with Zfp516 to promote UCP1 transcription and Brown fat Program. Cell Rep. 2016;15:2536–2549. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sakamoto A., Hino S., Nagaoka K., Anan K., Takase R., Matsumori H., et al. Lysine demethylase LSD1 Coordinates Glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2015;75:1445–1456. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mikkelsen J.G., Yant S.R., Meuse L., Huang Z., Xu H., Kay M.A. Helper-independent sleeping beauty transposon-transposase vectors for efficient nonviral gene delivery and persistent gene expression in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2003;8:654–665. doi: 10.1016/s1525-0016(03)00216-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kodama T., Yi J., Newberg J.Y., Tien J.C., Wu H., Finegold M.J., et al. Molecular profiling of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma using SB transposon mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018;115:E10417–E10426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808968115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kleiner D.E., Brunt E.M., Van Natta M., Behling C., Contos M.J., Cummings O.W., et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/hep.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jian C., Fu J., Cheng X., Shen L.J., Ji Y.X., Wang X., et al. Low-dose Sorafenib acts as a mitochondrial uncoupler and ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2020;31:892–908.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hu H., Miao Y.R., Jia L.H., Yu Q.Y., Zhang Q., Guo A.Y. AnimalTFDB 3.0: a comprehensive resource for annotation and prediction of animal transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D33–D38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Messeguer X., Escudero R., Farre D., Nunez O., Martinez J., Alba M.M. PROMO: detection of known transcription regulatory elements using species-tailored searches. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:333–334. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yevshin I., Sharipov R., Kolmykov S., Kondrakhin Y., Kolpakov F. GTRD: a database on gene transcription regulation-2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D100–D105. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haines R.R., Scharer C.D., Lobby J.L., Boss J.M. LSD1 Cooperates with Noncanonical NF-kappaB signaling to regulate Marginal Zone B cell development. J. Immunol. 2019;203:1867–1881. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao S., Chen S., Han D., Wang Z., Li M., Han W., et al. Chromatin binding of FOXA1 is promoted by LSD1-mediated demethylation in prostate cancer. Nat. Genet. 2020;52:1011–1017. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0681-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fang Y., Liao G., Yu B. LSD1/KDM1A inhibitors in clinical trials: advances and prospects. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019;12:129. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0811-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim D., Kim K.I., Baek S.H. Roles of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) in homeostasis and diseases. J. Biomed. Sci. 2021;28:41. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00737-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ishikawa Y., Nakayama K., Morimoto M., Mizutani A., Nakayama A., Toyoshima K., et al. Synergistic anti-AML effects of the LSD1 inhibitor T-3775440 and the NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor pevonedistat via transdifferentiation and DNA rereplication. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e377. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Macheleidt I.F., Dalvi P.S., Lim S.Y., Meemboor S., Meder L., Kasgen O., et al. Preclinical studies reveal that LSD1 inhibition results in tumor growth arrest in lung adenocarcinoma independently of driver mutations. Mol. Oncol. 2018;12:1965–1979. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee M.G., Wynder C., Cooch N., Shiekhattar R. An essential role for CoREST in nucleosomal histone 3 lysine 4 demethylation. Nature. 2005;437:432–435. doi: 10.1038/nature04021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lazarus J.V., Mark H.E., Anstee Q.M., Arab J.P., Batterham R.L., Castera L., et al. Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: a consensus statement. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:60–78. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00523-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schuster S., Cabrera D., Arrese M., Feldstein A.E. Triggering and resolution of inflammation in NASH. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018;15:349–364. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Katsiki N., Mikhailidis D.P., Mantzoros C.S. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and dyslipidemia: an update. Metabolism. 2016;65:1109–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Albillos A., de Gottardi A., Rescigno M. The gut-liver axis in liver disease: pathophysiological basis for therapy. J. Hepatol. 2020;72:558–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Harrison S.A., Allen A.M., Dubourg J., Noureddin M., Alkhouri N. Challenges and opportunities in NASH drug development. Nat. Med. 2023;29:562–573. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02242-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Konerman M.A., Jones J.C., Harrison S.A. Pharmacotherapy for NASH: current and emerging. J. Hepatol. 2018;68:362–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Harrison S.A., Loomba R., Dubourg J., Ratziu V., Noureddin M. Clinical trial landscape in NASH. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023;21:2001–2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bricambert J., Alves-Guerra M.C., Esteves P., Prip-Buus C., Bertrand-Michel J., Guillou H., et al. The histone demethylase Phf2 acts as a molecular checkpoint to prevent NAFLD progression during obesity. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2092. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04361-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim J.H., Nagappan A., Jung D.Y., Suh N., Jung M.H. Histone demethylase KDM7A contributes to the development of hepatic steatosis by targeting diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:11085. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cusan M., Cai S.F., Mohammad H.P., Krivtsov A., Chramiec A., Loizou E., et al. LSD1 inhibition exerts its antileukemic effect by recommissioning PU.1- and C/EBPalpha-dependent enhancers in AML. Blood. 2018;131:1730–1742. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-807024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gu F., Lin Y., Wang Z., Wu X., Ye Z., Wang Y., et al. Biological roles of LSD1 beyond its demethylase activity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020;77:3341–3350. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03489-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lan H., Tan M., Zhang Q., Yang F., Wang S., Li H., et al. LSD1 destabilizes FBXW7 and abrogates FBXW7 functions independent of its demethylase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:12311–12320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902012116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hollebecque A., Salvagni S., Plummer R., Niccoli P., Capdevila J., Curigliano G., et al. Clinical activity of CC-90011, an oral, potent, and reversible LSD1 inhibitor, in advanced malignancies. Cancer. 2022;128:3185–3195. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tayari M.M., Santos H.G.D., Kwon D., Bradley T.J., Thomassen A., Chen C., et al. Clinical Responsiveness to all-trans Retinoic acid is potentiated by LSD1 inhibition and associated with a quiescent transcriptome in myeloid malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;27:1893–1903. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang J., Scully K., Zhu X., Cai L., Zhang J., Prefontaine G.G., et al. Opposing LSD1 complexes function in developmental gene activation and repression programmes. Nature. 2007;446:882–887. doi: 10.1038/nature05671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Foster C.T., Dovey O.M., Lezina L., Luo J.L., Gant T.W., Barlev N., et al. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 regulates the embryonic transcriptome and CoREST stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;30:4851–4863. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00521-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the manuscript and Supplementary data.








