Significance
Navchannels are of tremendous physiological, pathophysiological, and pharmacological significance for their primary function in initiating and transmitting electrical signals. Structural determination of Navchannels in different working states is critical for an advanced understanding of their working mechanism and instrumental to rational drug development. In this study, we continue our efforts in dissecting the structure–function relationship of Navchannels. We report the structures of three human Nav1.7 mutants that contain different sets of point mutations. Comparative electrophysiological and structural analyses reveal a correlation of the right shift of the activation and static inactivation I–V curves with the contraction of the pore domain, which is featured with the π form helical turn in the S6 segments.
Keywords: voltage-gated sodium channel, electromechanical coupling, structure–function relationship, closed-state inactivation, cryo-EM
Abstract
Voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav) undergo conformational shifts in response to membrane potential changes, a mechanism known as the electromechanical coupling. To delineate the structure–function relationship of human Nav channels, we have performed systematic structural analysis using human Nav1.7 as a prototype. Guided by the structural differences between wild-type (WT) Nav1.7 and an eleven mutation-containing variant, designated Nav1.7-M11, we generated three additional intermediate mutants and solved their structures at overall resolutions of 2.9–3.4 Å. The mutant with nine-point mutations in the pore domain (PD), named Nav1.7-M9, has a reduced cavity volume and a sealed gate, with all voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) remaining up. Structural comparison of WT and Nav1.7-M9 pinpoints two residues that may be critical to the tightening of the PD. However, the variant containing these two mutations, Nav1.7-M2, or even in combination with two additional mutations in the VSDs, named Nav1.7-M4, failed to tighten the PD. Our structural analysis reveals a tendency of PD contraction correlated with the right shift of the static inactivation I–V curves. We predict that the channel in the resting state should have a “tight” PD with down VSDs.
Eukaryotic voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels govern membrane excitability by initiating and propagating electrical signals in the form of action potentials (1–4). At resting state, the membrane of excitable cells, like neurons and myocytes, is polarized with a negative potential. Nav channels in the resting state are nonconductive. They activate in response to membrane depolarization (5). A critical mechanism to ensure repetitive firing of action potentials is the rapid inactivation of Nav channels, which occurs within one or several milliseconds after activation (6, 7). Inactivated channels return to the resting state after membrane hyperpolarization to prepare for the next working cycle (5, 8).
Because of their foundational significance in physiology, aberrant function or regulation of Nav channels is associated with a myriad of pathogenic conditions, such as epileptic seizure, arrhythmia, and pain disorders (9–12). Consequently, Nav channels represent a major class of drug targets (13–15). Structural resolution of Nav channels in different functional states is not only critical for an advanced understanding of the fundamental physiological process of electrical signaling but also instrumental to the development of Nav-targeting drugs (16, 17).
Nav channels, like other voltage-gated cation channels, comprise two modules, the central pore domain (PD), which is responsible for selective and gated ion permeation, and the voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) that detect the changes of membrane potential and undergo conformational shifts accordingly (18). It is generally accepted that a Nav channel in the resting state has a closed PD with four “down” VSDs, in which the gating charge residues on the S4 segment face the intracellular side (4, 13). Activation of a Nav channel refers to pore opening induced by the upward movement of VSDs (19, 20). The concerted movements of VSDs with pore gating are known as the electromechanical coupling (21). From a physical perspective, a Nav channel is in essence an ensemble of multiple conformers, each of which may be specifically recognized by a modulator.
Up to date, the structures of eight subtypes of human Nav channels, Nav1.1–Nav1.8 have been reported (22–29). The only one whose structure is still at large is Nav1.9. However, most of the reported structures represent a similarly inactivated conformation, characteristic of non-conductive PD and four up VSDs. The major challenge in the structural biology of Nav channels is to unveil conformations associated with distinct states during the electromechanical coupling. Toward this goal, we have been using human Nav1.7 as a scaffold and exploited multiple strategies, such as introduction of point mutations and inclusion of state-dependent toxins or drugs (28, 30–33).
One of our recent attempts was to rationally substitute some of the Nav1.7 residues with the counterparts from NavPaS, which is the first eukaryotic Nav channel whose atomic structure was determined (34). Compared to human Nav channels, the structure of NavPaS, an isoform from American cockroach, is distinct from the human ones, with a more contracted PD and the VSDs in intermediate states (34). When nine loci on the PD of Nav1.7 were replaced by residues from NavPaS, the resulting variant, named Nav1.7-M9 (short as M9), showed right-shifted I–V curves for both activation and static state inactivation (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 and Table S1) (31). When combined with two additional mutations in VSDI and VSDII, the right shifts of these I–V curves of the variant, Nav1.7-M11, were more dramatic (Fig. 1 A and B) (31). Based on these I–V curves, we predicted that the structure of purified M11, in the absence of any membrane potential, might represent a closed-state inactivated (CSI) conformation. Indeed, the structure of M11-class I deviates substantially from that of the wild-type channel (Nav1.7-WT), characteristic of a tightly closed PD and a completely down VSD in the first repeat (VSDI) (Fig. 1C). In addition, VSDII moves toward the intracellular side by one gating charge (31). For simplicity, unless otherwise specified, Nav1.7-M11 or M11 will refer to the structure of M11-class I.
Fig. 1.
An overview of our rational design of Nav1.7 variants for structure–function relationship study. (A) A diagram illustrating the distribution of 11-point mutations on human Nav1.7 (M11). The nine loci on the pore-forming segments are substituted with corresponding residues from NavPaS. The mutant that contains these nine mutations is named M9. (B) Right shift of the activation and static inactivation I–V curves of Nav1.7 variants. This panel is adapted from Huang et al. (31). (C) Substantial conformational changes in the PD, VSDI, and VSDII between M11 and wild type (WT). Structures of M11 and WT are superimposed relative to the α subunit. Red arrows indicate the shifts of VSDI and the amino terminal domain (NTD) from WT to M11. PDB codes for M11 and WT are 7XVE and 7W9K, respectively. Insets: Structural mapping of the 11 mutations on Nav1.7-M11. The Cα atoms of the 11 loci are highlighted as spheres. (D) Nav1.7-M9 exhibits an intermediate conformation between M11 and WT. Left: The PD of M9 is similar to that of M11. Right: VSDI in M9 resembles that in WT. M9 is domain colored, and M11 (Left) and WT (Right) are colored green and gray, respectively. (E) Contracted PD in M9 and M11. The pore radii of M9 (orange), M11 (green) and WT (gray) were calculated in HOLE (35) and tabulated. Structural figures were prepared in ChimeraX (36) or PyMol (37).
In this study, we attempted to dissect the contributions of the eleven point mutations to the structural changes between WT and M11. In addition to M9, we generated two additional variants, Nav1.7-M2 that contains two PD mutations and its derivative Nav1.7-M4 that has the two additional VSD mutations as in M11. Our systematic structural examination of these Nav1.7 mutants affords an updated view of the structure–function relationship of Nav channels. These structures highlight the conformational complexity of the PD associated with non-conductive states.
Results
Cryo-EM Analysis Nav1.7-M9.
Following our established protocols (31), we obtained a three-dimensional (3D) electron microscopy (EM) reconstruction of Nav1.7-M9 in complex with the β1 subunit at overall resolution of 2.9 Å, using 483,417 particles (SI Appendix, Figs. S2–S4 and Table S2). Structural comparison of M9 with WT (PDB code: 7W9K) and M11 (PDB code: 7XVE) reveals that the extracellular loops (ECLs) of PD, VSDIII, and VSDIV align consistently across all three structures (30, 31). Yet, the conformation of M9 lies in an intermediate state between WT and M11. While the PD in M9 is nearly identical to that in M11, VSDI and VSDII of M9 resemble those in WT (Fig. 1D). In this regard, the overall conformation of M9 is mostly similar to the class II conformation of M11, except that its VSDII is fully up (SI Appendix, Fig. S5).
Permeation path calculations in HOLE (35) reveal that the radius of the constriction point along the intracellular gate of M9 is nearly identical to that of M11, approximately 1.5 Å narrower than that of WT (Fig. 1E). The contracted PD in M9 is consistent with our previous analysis that introduction of bulkier hydrophobic residues in fenestrations increases the energy barrier to open the pore as it is more difficult to disrupt the interactions between adjacent pore-forming segments (31). This observation is consistent with the right shift of the I–V curve for M9 activation (Fig. 1B).
Structural Variations between M9 and WT.
As we have previously elaborated the detailed structural differences between M11 and WT (31), we will mainly focus on the unique structural variations between M9 and WT to avoid redundancy.
Despite overall structural similarities of the VSDs between M9 and WT, there are slight conformational deviations in VSDI and VSDII. VSDI in M9 appears to be up, as in contrast to the completely inactivated conformation of that in M11. However, the S4I segment in M9 shifts toward the intracellular side by less than a half turn compared to WT (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). VSDII in M9 is completely up; the S4II segment is even slightly above that in WT (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2.
Structural differences between Nav1.7-M9 and Nav1.7-WT. (A) Minor structural shifts of VSDI and VSDII between M9 and WT. Despite the marked structural distinctions in the PD, the VSDs remain largely the same between M9 and WT. (B) Structural deviations of the PD between M9 and WT. Top: The S6II and S6IV segments undergo α to π transition from WT to M9. Red arrows indicate the coupled motions of S4-5II, S6II, and S6III. Bottom: Concerted movements of S4-5I with adjacent S4-5II and S5II. These conformational changes are similar to those between M11 and WT (31).
The tight PD and the up VSDs in M9 place the S4-5 segments in repeats I and II in conformations different from those in WT or M11 (Fig. 2B). The S4-5I segment moves closer to the central axis in M9, accompanying the centripetal movement of the ensuing S5I segment. The most dramatic conformational changes occur in S4-5II and the lower half of S5II (Fig. 2). In WT, S4-5II and S5II are connected by an unwound sharp turn (the elbow). In M9, the elbow transforms to a curved helix, resulting in a flattened S4-5II segment (the forearm).
Similar to what has been observed between M11 and WT (31), the movement of S4-5II toward the central axis, combined with the substitution of L866F on S5II, results in concerted conformational shifts in several PD segments to avoid steric clashes. The S4-5I and S4-5II undergo coupled movements, as the distance between the amino termini of S4-5I and S5II in M9 remains nearly unchanged compared to that in WT. These structural changes result in the α to π helix transition in the middle of S6II (Fig. 2B).
Examination of Key Residues on the Conformational Shifts of the PD.
Structural comparison between M9 and WT confirms that the nine mutations of Nav1.7 are sufficient to lock the PD in a tight conformation. Scrutiny of these loci show that mutations of residues on the upper half of the PD do not change the backbone positions, while those on the lower region, exemplified by L866F, T870M, and G1454C, undergo marked shifts (Fig. 3A). We then examined the effect of these mutations on the biophysical properties of Nav1.7.
Fig. 3.
The conformation of two Nav1.7 variants remains the same as WT. (A) Rationale to reduce the number of mutations in the PD. Among the nine mutations in M9, the backbone atoms of L866F, T870M, and G1454C exhibit structural variations, which are labeled in magenta. (B) Electrophysiological characterizations of additional Nav1.7 variants. The activation and steady-state inactivation curves of indicated Nav1.7 variants are shown. Data points are presented as mean ± SEM and n is the number of recorded cells. Please refer to Materials and Methods and SI Appendix, Table S1 for details. Nav1.7-M2 contains two-point mutations, L866F and G1454C. When two additional mutations, E156K on S2I and G779R on S2II, were introduced to M2, the resulting mutant, named Nav1.7-M4 could not be recorded despite our extensive efforts. (C) Structures of M2 and M4 are similar to that of WT. The three structures are superimposed relative to the α subunit. Insets: The backbone atoms of the four substituted residues in M4 remain unchanged to those in WT.
Single-point mutations L866F or G1454C both led to right shift in the voltage dependence of activation, with the V1/2 of activation curves shifting from −25.59 ± 0.22 mV for WT to −14.62 ± 0.43 mV, and −13.55 ± 0.37 mV, respectively (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Table S1). In contrast, T870M induced a left shift, resulting in the V1/2 of activation curve to −32.52 ± 0.31 mV (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Table S1). When L866F and G1454C were combined, named Nav1.7-M2, the activation curve was further shifted rightward with the V1/2 of activation reaching −3.30 ± 0.51 mV, which is close to 0.55 ± 0.43 mV for Nav1.7-M9, but with a less steep slope (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Table S1). The voltage dependence of the static inactivation curve of M2 is nearly identical with that of WT (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Table S1). Being curious whether the conformation of M2 resembles that of M9 or WT, we set out to solve the structure of Nav1.7-M2.
A 3D EM reconstruction of M2 was obtained with the overall resolution at 3.4 Å, using merely 77,511 particles (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S2). The structure of M2 is nearly identical with that of WT, with the RMSD of 0.5 Å over 1,181 Cα atoms of α subunit (Fig. 3C).
We then examined whether inclusion of E156K and G779R to M2, the resulting mutant named Nav1.7-M4, would alter the conformation, as these two VSD mutations induce marked structural shifts of VSDI and VSDII from M9 to M11 (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). However, M4 could not be recorded using whole-cell patch clamp in HEK293T cells despite extensive trials. Nevertheless, we proceeded with cryo-EM analysis of M4 and determined its structure to an overall resolution of 3.4 Å, using 181,009 particles (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S2). The structure of M4 is also nearly identical to WT, or M2 (Fig. 3C). Of note, the backbone of the four substituted loci, E156K, G779R, L866F, and G1454C in M4 completely overlap with those in WT (Fig. 3C).
Structural Heterogeneity in Nav1.7-Variants.
The structural similarity of M2 and M4 with WT suggests that the other seven loci on the PD, although sharing identical backbones in all the Nav1.7 variants, should have contributed to the structural malleability of the PD. If that is the case, we reasoned that the altered structural plasticity should be reflected from the homo- or heterogeneity of the particles in the cryo-samples.
It is noted that we recombinantly expressed, purified, and prepared cryo-EM samples for Nav1.7-WT, M2, M4, M9, and M11, following an identical protocol. The particles for WT are quite homogeneous. The majority of the particles was selected from the 2D classification to yield a 2.2 Å 3D reconstruction (30). In contrast, two major classes were obtained for M11, representing only 18.7% and 29.6% of the total 2D classified particles (31). M9 was also quite heterogeneous, with only 18.3% particles were selected from the 2D classification for one major 3D reconstruction. We did not collect a large number of micrographs for M2 or M4, as the preliminary assessment suggested they were also rather homogeneous, with 48.5% and 54.9% particles selected for final 3D reconstruction, respectively (Fig. 4A). These observations support our speculation that the seven point mutations confer enhanced structural flexibility in the absence of any membrane potential.
Fig. 4.
Increased conformational heterogeneity of Nav1.7-M9 and Nav1.7-M11. (A) The percentiles of selected particles in the final 3D reconstruction may indicate the conformational heterogeneity. M9 and M11 appear to be more heterogeneous than M2 and M4. The EM maps were contoured at 5~7 σ in ChimeraX. (B) Growing propensity for α to π transition in S6IV with increasing number of mutations. Potential conformational heterogeneity, reflected by compromised local resolutions, are indicated with short red arrows. The curved arrows in M9 and M11 indicate the rotation of S6IV as a result of α to π transition in the middle. The densities were prepared in ChimeraX and contoured at 6 σ.
Furthermore, scrutiny of the 3D EM map shows that increasing number of mutations is correlated with the α → π transition of the S6 segments, or in another word, the tightening of the PD (Fig. 4B). In WT, both S6II and S6IV are made of α helical turns only. In M9 and M11, both have the α → π transition in the middle helical turn. When it comes to M2 and M4, although we modeled S6IV in the form of α helical turns, the ambiguity of the local density suggests the existence of another conformer, as seen in the 3D reconstruction of Nav1.7 in the presence of the gating modifier toxins Huwentoxin IV (HWTX-IV) or Protoxin II (30) (Fig. 4B).
Discussion
In this study, we systematically compared the electrophysiological properties and the cryo-EM analysis of five Nav1.7 variants, WT, M2, M4, M9, and M11. In the WT channel, the PD has four fenestrations and a sterol-like density penetrating the intracellular gate. We assigned a glycol-diosgenin (GDN) molecule into this density, as it is the primary detergent used for protein purification. Although the gate radius at the constriction point is between 2.5 and 3 Å, it is not wide enough to permeate hydrated Na+ ions. We describe this conformation as the relaxed PD (Fig. 5 A and B). In M9 and M11, S6II and S6IV undergo α to π helical transition, leading to reduced volume of the central cavity, diminished or shrunk fenestration, and sealed intracellular gate that can no longer accommodate a lipid. We call it a tight PD. With regard to M2 and M4, despite similar conformation to WT, assigning GDN was challenging due to the shorter density (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). Although the dominant density for S6IV prefers the assignment of the α helix, a small portion may exist as the π form, a conformer that was resolved for Nav1.7 bound with HWTX-IV and saxitoxin, referred to as Nav1.7-HS-π (30). Notably, the structure of Nav1.7-HS-π has the π helical turn in S6IV but α helix in S6II. Its PD represents an intermediate state between the relaxed and the tight forms (Fig. 5B). In fact, the conformational complexity for non-conductive PD has also been discussed for voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels. In addition to the relaxed and tight states, which are similar to the corresponding ones discussed here, a loose state with even more dilated PD is observed in human Cav2.1 bound to a blocker pinaverium (38).
Fig. 5.
Structure–function relationship of the PD of Nav channels. (A) A diagram illustrating three resolved states of PD: relaxed, intermediate, and tight. There is a correlation of the cavity volume and the number of π-form S6 segments, as seen in panel B. S6II and S6IV are α helices in relaxed PD, and a sterol-like molecule penetrates the intracellular gate. There are four fenestrations in the relaxed PD. S6IV in the intermediate PD undergoes α to π helix transition, leading to the closure of I:IV fenestration. In the tight PD, both S6II and S6IV exhibit α to π helix transition, resulting in a completely sealed intracellular gate. (B) Non-conductive PD can correspond to multiple conformations. The corresponding pore radii of Nav1.7-M9 (orange), M11 (green), WT (gray), and HS-π (Nav1.7 in complex with HWTX-IV and saxitoxin, PDB code: 7W9P, purple) are compared, suggesting multiple conformations of PD. (C) Predicted electrophysiological properties for Nav variants to be structurally resolved in the resting state using standard protocols. For an Nav channel to stably stay in the resting state in the absence of membrane potential, its activation and steady-state inactivation thresholds should be both beyond 0 mV, as indicated by the dashed lines.
A challenge in the structural characterizations of voltage-gated ion channels (VGICs) is to assign the functional states to the structures. Before the complete working cycle of a VGIC is structurally resolved, it is difficult to unambiguously establish the structure– function relationship of a particular conformer. Our systematic electrophysiological and cryo-EM characterizations of rationally designed Nav1.7 mutants shed light on the structural interpretation of the I–V curves for voltage-dependent activation and static-inactivation.
The activation curve reflects the voltage-dependent equilibrium between the resting and activated states, while the static inactivation curve indicates that between the resting and the inactivated states. Taking Nav1.7 as an example, the WT channel can fully activate upon membrane depolarization to 0 mV; however, after prolonged duration, all the channels are trapped in the inactivated state (Figs. 1B and 5C). The structure obtained under such condition is expected to represent an open-state inactivated (OSI) conformation, featured with the relaxed PD and all up VSDs. In the case of M11, a depolarization to 0 mV is not sufficient to open the channel, yet the majority can be trapped in the inactivated state. Therefore, the structure, which is characteristic of a tight PD with at least two fully up VSDs, may represent the CSI conformation.
Along this line of thinking, additional mutations may help capture the structure of a resting-state Nav, although the activated state is always transient due to the fast inactivation mechanism. The variant to be trapped in the resting state in the absence of membrane potential should have the right-shifted activation curve as in M11 and, more importantly, a further right-shifted static inactivation curve that has 100% open capacity at 0 mV (Fig. 5C). As the tight PD cannot possibly further contract, we predict that the resting-state structure should have a tight PD conformation as seen in M9 and M11. The S4 segments in the VSDs should have extensive interactions with the pore-forming segments. The interface between the fully deactivated VSDI and the segments in the tight PD in M11 may shed light on the modeling of a bona fide resting state structure.
Materials and Methods
Whole-Cell Electrophysiology.
The codon-optimized cDNAs of wild-type Nav1.7 (Nav1.7-WT, UniProt: Q15858) and Nav1.7-M9 (L866F, T870M, A874F, V947F, M952F, V953F, V1438I, V1439F, and G1454C) were synthesized (BGI Geneland Scientific Co., Ltd) and subcloned into the pCAG vector with twin Strep-tag and FLAG tag in tandem at the amino terminus (39). Nav1.7-M11 was generated by introducing two additional VSD mutations (E156K and G779R) to Nav1.7-M9. Nav1.7-M2 was generated by introducing two mutations (L866F, and G1454C) to Nav1.7-WT. Nav1.7-M4 was generated by introducing two additional VSD mutations (E156K and G779R) to Nav1.7-M2. All of these variants were generated using a standard One-step Quick Change cloning. All plasmids were validated by DNA sequencing.
For whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, the overall methods were similar to our previously reported protocols (31). The HEK293T cells (Invitrogen) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, BI) supplemented with 4.5 mg/mL glucose and 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, BI). Cells for recordings were plated onto glass coverslips and transiently co-transfected with the expression plasmid for Nav1.7-variants and an eGFP-encoding plasmid using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Cells with green fluorescence were selected for patch-clamp recording 18 to 36 h after transfection. All experiments were performed at room temperature. No further authentication was performed for the commercially available cell line. Mycoplasma contamination was not tested.
The whole-cell Na+ currents were recorded using an EPC10-USB amplifier with Patchmaster software v2*90.2 (HEKA Elektronic), filtered at 3 kHz (low-pass Bessel filter) and sampled at 50 kHz. The borosilicate pipettes (Sutter Instrument) had a resistance of 2 to 4 MΩ and the electrodes were filled with the internal solution composed of (in mM) 105 CsF, 40 CsCl, 10 NaCl, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 with CsOH. The bath solutions contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 4 KCl, 10 HEPES, 10 D-glucose, 1 MgCl2, 1.5 CaCl2, pH 7.4 with NaOH.
The voltage dependence activation was recorded by using a protocol consisting of steps from a holding potential of −120 mV (for 200 ms) to voltages ranging from −90 mV to +80 mV for 50 ms in 5 mV increment. In the activation property analysis, we used the equation, G = I/(V − Vr), where Vr (the reversal potential) represents the voltage at which the current is zero. For the activation curves, conductance (G) was normalized and plotted against the voltage from −90 mV to +20 mV ~ +60 mV as appropriate. For voltage dependence inactivation, cells were clamped at a holding potential of −90 mV and were applied to step pre-pulses from −130 mV or −120 mV to 0 mV for 50 ms with an increment of 5 mV. Then, the Na+ currents were recorded at the test pulse of 0 mV for 50 ms. The peak currents under the test pulses were normalized and plotted against the pre-pulse voltage. The steady-state inactivation curves were fitted with a Boltzmann function to obtain V1/2 and slope values. The linear component of leaky currents and capacitive transients were subtracted using the P/4 procedure. Data were analyzed using Origin (OriginLab) and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software).
Recombinant Co-Expression and Purification of the Human Nav1.7-Variants.
For protein expression, purification of human Nav1.7-variants, as well as the subsequent data processing, was carried out following our optimized protocols (31). The Nav1.7-variants were coexpressed with the auxiliary subunits β1 and/or β2 following an identical protocol as reported (28). HEK293F cells (Invitrogen) were cultured in SMM 293 T-II medium (Sino Biological Inc.) under 5% CO2 in a Multitron-Pro shaker (Infors, 130 r.p.m.) at 37 °C and transfected with plasmids when the cell density reached 2.0 × 106 cells per mL. For 1 L cell culture, 1.5 mg for Nav1.7-variants plus 0.5 mg for β1 and/or 0.5 mg for β2 were preincubated with 4 mg 25-kDa linear polyethylenimines (PEIs, Polysciences) in 25 mL fresh medium for 20 min before adding into cell culture. Transfected cells were cultured for 48 h before harvesting.
Protein purification was carried out following our optimized protocol (28). Twenty L cells co-transfected with Nav1.7-variants plus β subunits were used for one batch of sample preparation. They were harvested by centrifugation at 800×g and resuspended in the lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 150 mM NaCl. The suspension was supplemented with 1% (w/v) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DDM, Anatrace), 0.1% (w/v) cholesteryl hemisuccinate Tris salt (CHS, Anatrace), and protease inhibitor cocktail containing 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), aprotinin (6.5 μg/mL), pepstatin (3.5 μg/mL), and leupeptin (25 μg/mL). After incubation at 4 °C for 2 h, the cell lysate was ultra-centrifuged at 20,000×g for 45 min, and the supernatant was applied to anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Sigma) by gravity at 4 °C. The resin was rinsed four times with the wash buffer (buffer W) containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% glycol-diosgenin (GDN, Anatrace), and the protease inhibitor cocktail. Proteins were eluted with buffer W plus 200 μg/mL FLAG peptide (Sigma). The eluent was then applied to Strep-Tactin Sepharose (IBA) and the purification protocol was similar to the previous steps except that the elution buffer was buffer W plus 2.5 mM D-Desthiobiotin (IBA). It was then concentrated using a 100-kDa cut-off Centricon (Millipore) and further purified through Superose-6 increase column (GE Healthcare) in buffer W. The peak fractions were pooled and concentrated to ~1 mg/mL, and then conducted cryo-EM sample preparation.
Cryo-EM Data Acquisition.
Aliquots of 3.5 μL freshly purified Nav1.7-variants were placed on glow-discharged holey carbon grids (Quantifoil Au 300 mesh, R1.2/1.3). Grids were blotted for 3.0 s and plunge frozen in liquid ethane cooled by liquid nitrogen with Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher).
For Nav1.7-M2, electron micrographs were acquired on a Titan Krios electron microscope (Thermo Fisher) operating at 300 kV and equipped with a Gatan K3 Summit detector and GIF Quantum energy filter. A total of 5,106 movie stacks were automatically collected using AutoEMation (40) with a slit width of 20 eV on the energy filter and a preset defocus ranging from -1.8 µm to -1.5 µm in super-resolution mode at a nominal magnification of 105,000 X. Each stack was exposed for 2.56 s with 0.08 s per frame, resulting in 32 frames per stack.
For Nav1.7-M4 and Nav1.7-M9, complex, electron micrographs were acquired on a Titan Krios electron microscope (Thermo Fisher) operating at 300 kV and equipped with Gatan K3 Summit detector and GIF Quantum energy filter. 7468/5167 movie stacks were automatically collected using AutoEMation (40) with a slit width of 20 eV on the energy filter and a preset defocus ranging from −1.8 µm to −1.5 µm in super-resolution mode at a nominal magnification of 64,000 X. Each stack was exposed for 2.56 s with 0.08 s per frame, resulting in 32 frames per stack.
The total dose was 50 e−/Å2 for all the datasets. The stacks were motion-corrected with MotionCor2 (41) or Warp (42) and binned twofold, resulting in 0.8374 Å/pixel for Nav1.7-M2, and 1.0979 Å/pixel for Nav1.7-M4 and Nav1.7-M9. Dose weighting was performed as described (43). Defocus values were estimated using Gctf (44) or cryoSPARC (45).
Image Processing.
For simplicity, the data processing of Nav1.7-M9 was selected as representative with a diagram showed in SI Appendix Fig. S2. A total of 4,400,497 particles were automatically picked using template picking in cryoSPARC. After 2D classification, a total of 2,634,558 good particles were selected, these particles were subject to one round of Non-uniform Refinement, resulting in 3D reconstructions at 2.89 Å. The resulting particles were subject to one additional round of Heterogeneous Refinement in cryoSPARC, with the number of classes set to 10. A total of 483,417 particles were selected and applied to another round of Non-uniform Refinement and CTF refinement, resulting in final reconstructions at overall resolutions of 2.89 Å (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Table S2). Other datasets were processed with the same workflow. Briefly, a total of 6,398,495 and 11,394,867 particles of Nav1.7-M2 and Nav1.7-M4 were automatically picked, respectively. After 2D classification, 159,730 and 329,563 good particles were selected for Nav1.7-M2 and Nav1.7-M4. After a round of Non-uniform Refinement, Heterogenous Refinement and additional Non-uniform Refinement, the final reconstructions of Nav1.7-M2 and Nav1.7-M4 were reconstituted at overall resolution of 3.37 and 3.39 Å using 77,511 and 181,009 particles, respectively.
Model Building and Structure Refinement.
Model building was performed based on the map acquired in the data processing. The starting model of Nav1.7 (PDB code: 7W9K) (30), was fitted into the EM map by Chimera (46). All Nav1.7 residues, lipids, and sugar moieties were manually checked in COOT (47). The chemical properties of amino acids were taken into consideration during model building.
Structural refinement was performed using phenix.real_space_refine application in PHENIX (48) with secondary structure and geometry restraints. Over-fitting of the overall model was monitored by refining the model in one of the two independent maps from the gold-standard refinement approach and testing the refined model against the other map (49). Statistics of the map reconstruction and model refinement can be found in SI Appendix Table S2.
Supplementary Material
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Xiaomin Li, Fan Yang, and Jianlin Lei for the technical support during EM image acquisition. We thank the Tsinghua University Branch of China National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing) for providing the cryo-EM facility support. We thank the computational facility support from Tsinghua University Branch of China National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing). This work was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 32330052).
Author contributions
N.Y. designed research; Z.L., Q.W., G.H., X.J., and J.L. performed research; Z.L., Q.W., G.H., X.J., and X.P. analyzed data; and Z.L., Q.W., and N.Y. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
Reviewers: S.D., The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology; and G.Y., China Agricultural University.
Contributor Information
Zhangqiang Li, Email: lizhangq@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Nieng Yan, Email: nyan@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
The atomic coordinates of Nav1.7-variants have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org) under the accession codes 8XMN (Nav1.7-M2) (50), 8XMO (Nav1.7-M4) (51), and 8XMM (Nav1.7-M9) (52). The corresponding electron microscopy maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/emdb/) with the accession codes EMD-38483 (53), EMD-38484 (54), and EMD-38482 (55), respectively. All other data are included in the manuscript and/or SI Appendix.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Catterall W. A., From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: The structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron 26, 13–25 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hille B., Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes (Sinauer Associates, Inc., 3rd ed., 2001). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hodgkin A. L., Huxley A. F., Resting and action potentials in single nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 104, 176–195 (1945). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ahern C. A., Payandeh J., Bosmans F., Chanda B., The Hitchhiker’s guide to the voltage-gated sodium channel galaxy. J. Gen. Physiol. 147, 1–24 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shcherbatko A., Ono F., Mandel G., Brehm P., Voltage-dependent sodium channel function is regulated through membrane mechanics. Biophys. J. 77, 1945–1959 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bezanilla F., Armstrong C. M., Inactivation of the sodium channel. I. Sodium current experiments. J. Gen. Physiol. 70, 549–566 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F., Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments. J Gen Physiol 70, 567–590 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu L., et al. , Voltage-gated sodium channels: Structures, functions, and molecular modeling. Drug Discov. Today 24, 1389–1397 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Denac H., Mevissen M., Scholtysik G., Structure, function and pharmacology of voltage-gated sodium channels. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 362, 453–479 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Catterall W. A., Voltage-gated sodium channels at 60: Structure, function and pathophysiology. J. Physiol. 590, 2577–2589 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang W., Liu M., Yan S. F., Yan N., Structure-based assessment of disease-related mutations in human voltage-gated sodium channels. Protein Cell 8, 401–438 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Savio-Galimberti E., Gollob M. H., Darbar D., Voltage-gated sodium channels: Biophysics, pharmacology, and related channelopathies. Front. Pharmacol. 3, 124 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bagal S. K., Marron B. E., Owen R. M., Storer R. I., Swain N. A., Voltage gated sodium channels as drug discovery targets. Channels (Austin) 9, 360–366 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clare J. J., Tate S. N., Nobbs M., Romanos M. A., Voltage-gated sodium channels as therapeutic targets. Drug Discov. Today 5, 506–520 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Lera Ruiz M., Kraus R. L., Voltage-gated sodium channels: Structure, function, pharmacology, and clinical indications. J. Med. Chem. 58, 7093–7118 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li Z., Wu Q., Yan N., A structural atlas of druggable sites on Na(v) channels. Channels (Austin) 18, 2287832 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Noreng S., Li T., Payandeh J., Structural pharmacology of voltage-gated sodium channels. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 166967 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yu F. H., Yarov-Yarovoy V., Gutman G. A., Catterall W. A., Overview of molecular relationships in the voltage-gated ion channel superfamily. Pharmacol. Rev. 57, 387–395 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F., Charge movement associated with the opening and closing of the activation gates of the Na channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 63, 533–552 (1974). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang N., Horn R., Evidence for voltage-dependent S4 movement in sodium channels. Neuron 15, 213–218 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Long S. B., Campbell E. B., Mackinnon R., Voltage sensor of Kv1.2: Structural basis of electromechanical coupling. Science 309, 903–908 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pan X., et al. , Comparative structural analysis of human Na(v)1.1 and Na(v)1.5 reveals mutational hotspots for sodium channelopathies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2100066118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pan X., et al. , Molecular basis for pore blockade of human Na(+) channel Na(v)1.2 by the mu-conotoxin KIIIA. Science 363, 1309–1313 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li X., et al. , Structural basis for modulation of human Na(V)1.3 by clinical drug and selective antagonist. Nat. Commun. 13, 1286 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pan X., et al. , Structure of the human voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.4 in complex with beta1. Science 362, eaau2486 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li Z., et al. , Structural basis for pore blockade of the human cardiac sodium channel Na(v) 1.5 by the antiarrhythmic drug quinidine*. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 11474–11480 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fan X., Huang J., Jin X., Yan N., Cryo-EM structure of human voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2220578120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shen H., Liu D., Wu K., Lei J., Yan N., Structures of human Na(v)1.7 channel in complex with auxiliary subunits and animal toxins. Science 363, 1303–1308 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang X., et al. , Structural basis for high-voltage activation and subtype-specific inhibition of human Na(v)1.8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2208211119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang G., et al. , High-resolution structures of human Na(v)1.7 reveal gating modulation through alpha-pi helical transition of S6(IV). Cell Rep. 39, 110735 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang G., et al. , Unwinding and spiral sliding of S4 and domain rotation of VSD during the electromechanical coupling in Na(v)1.7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2209164119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu Q., et al. , Structural mapping of Na(v)1.7 antagonists. Nat. Commun. 14, 3224 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huang J., et al. , Cannabidiol inhibits Nav channels through two distinct binding sites. Nat. Commun. 14, 3613 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shen H., et al. , Structure of a eukaryotic voltage-gated sodium channel at near-atomic resolution. Science 355, eaal4326 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Smart O. S., Neduvelil J. G., Wang X., Wallace B. A., Sansom M. S., HOLE: A program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 354–376 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pettersen E. F., et al. , UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.DeLano W. L., The PyMOL molecular graphics system (2002). https://www.pymol.org. Accessed 9 December 2023
- 38.Gao S., et al. , Structural basis for human Ca(v)1.2 inhibition by multiple drugs and the neurotoxin calciseptine. Cell 186, 5363–5374.e5316 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goehring A., et al. , Screening and large-scale expression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2574–2585 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lei J., Frank J., Automated acquisition of cryo-electron micrographs for single particle reconstruction on an FEI Tecnai electron microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 150, 69–80 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zheng S. Q., et al. , MotionCor2: Anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tegunov D., Cramer P., Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grant T., Grigorieff N., Measuring the optimal exposure for single particle cryo-EM using a 2.6 angstrom reconstruction of rotavirus VP6. eLife 4, e06980 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang K., GCTF: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Punjani A., Rubinstein J. L., Fleet D. J., Brubaker M. A., cryoSPARC: Algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pettersen E. F., et al. , UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W. G., Cowtan K., Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D, Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Adams P. D., et al. , PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D, Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Amunts A., et al. , Structure of the yeast mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit. Science 343, 1485–1489 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li Z. et al., the atomic coordinates of Nav1.7-M2. PDB. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8XMN. Deposited 27 December 2023.
- 51.Li Z., et al. , the atomic coordinates of Nav1.7-M4. PDB. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8XMO. Deposited 27 December 2023.
- 52.Li Z., et al. , the atomic coordinates of Nav1.7-M9. PDB. https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8XMM. Deposited 27 December 2023.
- 53.Li Z., et al. , the cryo-EM map of Nav1.7-M2. EMDB. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-38483. Deposited 27 December 2023.
- 54.Li Z., et al. , the cryo-EM map of Nav1.7-M4. EMDB. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-38484. Deposited 27 December 2023.
- 55.Li Z., et al. , the cryo-EM map of Nav1.7-M9. EMDB. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/EMD-38482. Deposited 27 December 2023.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix 01 (PDF)
Data Availability Statement
The atomic coordinates of Nav1.7-variants have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org) under the accession codes 8XMN (Nav1.7-M2) (50), 8XMO (Nav1.7-M4) (51), and 8XMM (Nav1.7-M9) (52). The corresponding electron microscopy maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/emdb/) with the accession codes EMD-38483 (53), EMD-38484 (54), and EMD-38482 (55), respectively. All other data are included in the manuscript and/or SI Appendix.





