Abstract
Kidney filtration is ensured by the interaction of podocytes, endothelial and mesangial cells. Immunoglobulin accumulation at the filtration barrier is pathognomonic for glomerular injury. The mechanisms that regulate filter permeability are unknown. Here, we identify a pivotal role for the proteasome in a specific cell type. Combining genetic and inhibitor-based human, pig, mouse, and Drosophila models we demonstrate that the proteasome maintains filtration barrier integrity, with podocytes requiring the constitutive and glomerular endothelial cells the immunoproteasomal activity. Endothelial immunoproteasome deficiency as well as proteasome inhibition disrupt the filtration barrier in mice, resulting in pathologic immunoglobulin deposition. Mechanistically, we observe reduced endocytic activity, which leads to altered membrane recycling and endocytic receptor turnover. This work expands the concept of the (immuno)proteasome as a control protease orchestrating protein degradation and antigen presentation and endocytosis, providing new therapeutic targets to treat disease-associated glomerular protein accumulations.
Subject terms: Proteasome, Glomerular diseases, Endocytosis, Podocytes
In the kidney, maintaining permeability of the filtration barrier is critical. Here, Sachs W. et al show that homeostasis of podocytes and glomerular endothelial cells relies on differing proteasome constitutions which orchestrate endocytic activity in addition to protein degradation.
Introduction
The kidney assures adequate blood filtration and urine production within the glomerulus by the functional interplay of three resident glomerular cell types, namely visceral epithelial cells (podocytes), glomerular endothelial cells (GEnCs) and mesangial cells1. Parietal epithelial cells constitute the inner layer of Bowman’s capsule which surrounds the glomerular convolute. The glomerular filtration barrier (GFB), which imparts both size- and charge-selective properties is composed of podocytes on the urinary side and GEnCs on the blood side. Both cell types are separated by the glomerular basement membrane2. Podocytes envelop the glomerular capillaries with an intricate network of major- and foot processes. Foot processes between neighboring podocytes interdigitate, to ultimately form a specialized form of cell-cell junction, the slit diaphragm3. To add to the high hydraulic conductivity and charge selectivity of the GFB, GEnCs are highly specialized with an elaborate fenestration and glycocalyx. Mesangial cells (MCs) are contractile cells that constitute the central stalk of the glomerulus to provide structural support and, as specialized pericytes, indirectly participate in filtration by reducing the glomerular surface area by contraction4. Under physiologic conditions, kidneys are perfused with ~680 ml blood plasma per minute to generate 180 l of mostly protein-free urinary ultrafiltrate per day. Even though plasma is extremely rich in proteins5, the deposition of protein along the GFB is neglectable, suggesting that mechanisms must exist to prevent abundant plasma proteins from clogging the GFB. Besides mechanic processes governing renal filter properties to protein6,7, glomerular cell types themselves might contribute to glomerular protein clearance, such as MCs by phagocytosis8,9 or podocytes by transcytosis10.
Typical for glomerular injury is the intracellular11 as well as the extracellular deposition of proteins. Injurious macromolecules originating from the plasma usually deposit in glomerular cell type specific subendothelial-, subepithelial- or mesangial patterns. The mechanisms underlying these pathologic protein depositions are elusive. As alterations in protein degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagosome-lysosome pathway (ALP) have been observed in glomerular injury12–14, protein degradation systems might physiologically contribute to keeping the glomerulus free from injurious protein deposits. However, the homeostatic dependence of glomerular cell types on these two main protein degradation systems (Fig. 1A), especially the proteasome system, is unknown. As a major protein quality control system, the UPS comprises a cascade of E1-E2-E3 enzymes that ubiquitinate substrate proteins, as well as of deubiquitinating enzymes which edit ubiquitin chains from substrate proteins. In general, ubiquitination determines the cellular fate of proteins including their activity, membrane localization, and/or their degradation by the proteasome15. The proteasome, as a complex protease, contains two general assemblies: a proteolytic chamber (20S core particle) harboring the proteolytically active β-subunits, and a regulatory particle (19S regulatory particle). The 20S and 19S particles are functionally linked by a gated protein translocation channel to form the 26S (20S associated with one 19S regulatory particle) or 30S (20S associated with two 19S regulatory particles) proteasome13 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Degradation through the 20S proteasome is ATP and ubiquitin-independent16. The 20S core particle exists in multiple structural isoforms depending on the incorporated proteolytically active subunits. As such the constitutive proteasome harbors the β5c, β2c, and β1c subunits to form the constitutive 20S core particle (c20S), whereas the immunoproteasome replaces the proteolytic c20S subunits by the β5i (Lmp7), β1i, and β2i subunits upon IFNγ or TNFα stimulation to constitute the immuno-20S core particle (i20S). Further, hybrid constitutions between the c20S and i20S exist. Related to structural differences between the proteolytic constitutive- and immuno-β-subunits, different cleavage preferences are determined by the nature of the substrate specific pockets17.
The proteasome is required for the controlled removal of over 80% of cellular proteins and hence is essential for the maintenance of a dynamic and balanced proteome. Despite its major importance for cellular proteostasis, our knowledge regarding the physiologic significance of the proteasome in glomerular cells is very scant even though proteome disbalances and pathological protein accumulations are known features of glomerular injury. The existence of complex differential proteostasis principles within the glomerular syncytium can be suspected. As such, resident glomerular cell types are differentially affected in genetic, metabolic, and inflammatory disorders that affect proteostasis, and this not only between cell types but also between species12–14. Understanding the physiology of glomerular cell proteasome processivity is urgently needed to drive our pathophysiologic understanding of glomerular injury leading to end stage renal disease and dialysis. Using techniques specifically established for these investigations, we systematically dissect the functional significance of the proteasome for glomerular proteostasis in a unique cell type specific approach. Our findings expand the concept of the proteasome as a control protease for protein degradation and antigen presentation to an orchestrator of endocytic protein clearance at the kidney filter.
Results
Differential expression of degradation systems in resident glomerular cell types
Our knowledge about the glomerular cell-dependence on proteostatic principles is scant. Therefore, comparative analyses of ubiquitin proteasome (UPS) and autophagosome-lysosome (ALP) marker protein (Fig. 1A) expression patterns were performed in human and murine glomerular cell types. High-resolution confocal analyses revealed an accentuated abundance of ubiquitin in podocytes and GEnCs and of the main proteolytic β5c subunit of the c20S proteasome in podocytes, a finding appreciable in healthy human (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. 1) as well as murine (Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. 2) glomeruli. The expression pattern of LC3-positive autophagosomes was balanced between all three resident murine glomerular cell types whereas in humans, podocytes exhibited a prominent LC3 staining pattern. Contrasting, the expression pattern of lysosome subtypes differed between species and glomerular cell types. Whereas murine MCs exhibited an accentuated expression of Limp2-positive lysosomes and GEnCs of Lamp2-positive lysosomes, podocytes exhibited a comparably low expression pattern for both lysosome subtypes. In human glomeruli, the expression pattern of LAMP1- and LIMP2-positive lysosomes was balanced between the three resident intraglomerular cells. Parietal epithelial cells exhibited a strong LAMP1 expression pattern.
As the distribution of ubiquitin and of the β5c-proteasome subunit was most prominent in human and murine podocytes, we refined our analyses by assessing the molecular properties of podocytes, GEnCs, and MCs in accessible human (KPMP, Kidney Precision Medicine Project, accessed 12/04/2023; https://www.kpmp.org) and published mouse glomerular single cell RNAseq databases18 with focus on UPS transcripts (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4) and by using a proteomic, qPCR, and immunoblotting approach in bulk-isolated murine glomerular cell types19 (Fig. 1D–F). As illustrated within the radar plot (Fig. 1D), our analyses support the view of murine podocytes as cells with a high proteasome abundance. In contrast to GEnCs and MCs, murine podocytes exhibited enriched levels of a multitude of c20S proteasome subunits including Psmb5 (β5c), Psmb6 (β1c), and Psmb7 (β2c) in bulk proteomic data (Supplementary Fig. 3A) and single cell RNAseq analyses (Supplementary Fig. 3B), an expression pattern mostly transcriptionally substantiated in human glomerular cell types (Supplementary Fig. 3C). This preferential podocyte expression of standard proteasomal subunits was validated on the transcriptional level (Psmb5, Fig. 1E) and on the protein level by immunoblotting for β5c, β1c, and for the 19S regulatory particle subunit Rpt5 in mice (Fig. 1F). Glomerular cell types were loaded in a cell number adapted manner for comparison, as they do not express the same quantity of common housekeepers (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Corroborating the histological analyses, bulk proteomic analysis of ALP marker proteins also revealed a glomerular cell type distinct clustering in mice (Supplementary Fig. 6A) supporting the view of GEnCs as cells with endosomal abundance, and mesangial and podocytes as cells with abundance in lysosomes. This distribution pattern diverged on the single cell RNAseq level (Supplementary Fig. 6B, C). Nonetheless, the specific histologic distribution of Limp2 (abundant within MCs and GEnCs) and Lamp2 (abundant within GEnCs) lysosomes in mice could be validated on the transcriptional level for Scarb2 (transcript of Limp2, Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. 6B) and on the protein level for Limp2 and Lamp2 (Fig. 1F). Single cell RNAseq reanalyzes substantiated the enhanced expression of SCARB2 in human podocytes (Supplementary Fig. 6C).
In summary, human and mouse podocytes have a high constitutive proteasome protein abundance, in contrast to GEnCs and MCs. The glomerular cell distribution and abundance of lysosome subtypes (i.e., Limp2+ lysosomes) varies between species. In the following investigations we focused on an in-depth dissection of the physiological significance of the proteasome system within glomerular cell types.
Proteasome constitutions differ between podocytes and GEnCs
The proteasome is a highly versatile multi-subunit complex, which exists in different constitutions depending on the proteolytic subunits incorporated within the 20S core particle, especially of the main proteolytic β5 subunits. Cells exposed to oxidative stress and/or inflammatory stimuli have been shown to induce the immunoproteasome (marked by the main proteolytic β5i subunit), which differs from the constitutive proteasome by an enhanced proteolytic efficiency and a different cleavage specificity, thus generating peptides best for MHC-I presentation20. Whereas podocytes exhibit a strong abundance of the constitutive proteolytic c20S β-subunits, our proteomic analyses marked a strong abundance of all proteolytic immunoproteasome β-subunits in GEnCs, namely of Psmb8 (β5i, Lmp7) as well as of Psmb10 (β2i) and Psmb9 (β1i) (Fig. 2A). The strong β5i abundance in murine GEnCs was quantitively validated by immunoblot (Fig. 2B) and qPCR (Fig. 2C) and localized to GEnCs in both human and mouse glomeruli (Fig. 2D). Analysis of single cell RNAseq datasets confirmed the preferential expression of proteolytic immunoproteasome subunits in murine and human GEnCs (Supplementary Fig. 3B, C). Together, these analyses depict a conserved dissection of β5c and β5i expression among podocytes and GEnCs across species. Since protein levels of the proteolytic β-subunits do not necessarily reflect their actual activity, we performed proteasomal subunit-specific activity measurements using activity-based probes in glomerular cell types. The pan-proteasome activity-based probe MVB003 (which binds to all proteolytic β-subunits and does not differentiate between β5c and β5i activity) depicted a prominent β5c/β5i-subunit activity in GEnCs followed by podocytes (Fig. 2E). GEnCs also exhibited activity of the β1i- and β2i-subunits, which was not present in podocytes or MCs. The use of the β5i-specific activity-based probe GB514 substantiated the high activity of β5i in GEnCs. To visualize the differing extent of proteasome activity between glomerular cell types in vivo, we established an ex vivo activity measurement assay applying MVB003 in pig glomeruli. Corroborating our findings in the lysate in-gel activities, proteasome activity was strongest in pig GEnCs followed by podocytes. MCs distinguished themselves by the absence of MVB003 signal (Fig. 2F, G).
Taken together our data show that within the glomerular syncytium GEnCs and podocytes have the strongest proteasome activity. Whereas podocytes exhibit mostly constitutive proteasome-related activity, GEnCs distinguish themselves with an additional immunoproteasome activity.
20S processivity ensures morphologic and functional glomerular filtration barrier integrity
The functional significance of the GEnCs-specific immunoproteasome activity was assessed by establishing an inducible endothelial cell-specific β5i (Lmp7) knockout mouse (Lmp7ΔEnC) (Fig. 3A). The successful endothelial induction of β5i-deficiency following tamoxifen administration was validated by the loss of β5i protein expression in glomerular endothelial cells by immunofluorescence (Fig. 3B) and immunoblotting of bulk-isolated GEnCs (Fig. 3C). Strikingly, Lmp7ΔEnC-derived GEnCs exhibited an increased β5c protein abundance compared to littermate control cells (Fig. 3C, quantification lower graph), suggesting a compensatory upregulation of this constitutive proteasome subunit. We assessed whether endothelial β5i-loss affected surface expression of Major Histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I), as constitutive Lmp7-knockout mice are known to exhibit a reduced surface expression of MHC-I due to altered peptide generation for MHC-I related antigen-presentation21. In line, inducible Lmp7ΔEnC-derived GEnCs exhibited a reduced MHC-I surface expression (Fig. 3D, quantification lower graph). Unexpectedly, despite an increased abundance of β5c, endothelial loss of the β5i-subunit resulted in strong phenotypic alterations. To this end, GEnCs isolated from Lmp7ΔEnC kidneys exhibited an increased cell size compared to control GEnCs (Fig. 3E), which was not due to differences in the cell cycle state of the cells (Fig. 3F and Supplementary Fig. 7). Further, β5i-deficient GEnCs showed a loss of fenestration by ultrastructural analyses (Fig. 3G, quantification left lower graph). Interestingly, β5i-deficiency also affected general GFB morphology (Fig. 3G and Supplementary Fig. 8), as mild but significant podocyte foot process effacement (Fig. 3G, middle lower graph) and glomerular basement membrane splitting with electron densities and irregularity in thickness (Fig. 3G, right lower graph) were appreciated. GEnC β5i-deficiency did not translate to an enhanced abundance of proteasome substrates (lysine-48-polyubiquitinated proteins) by immunoblotting (Fig. 3H), suggesting an intact removal of proteins by the compensatory upregulated β5c subunit. Further, the observed GFB alterations in Lmp7ΔEnC mice functionally did not translate to a measurable leakiness to albumin (Fig. 3I), which might be related to an increased reabsorption of filtered albumin by proximal tubular cells.
In a next step, we established the significance of the proteolytic β-subunits for podocyte proteostasis. Genetic targeting of β5c is not feasible to date, therefore we set out to modulate constitutive β-subunit activities by chemical modulation using epoxomicin. This pan-proteasome inhibitor binds covalently to all proteolytic β-subunits, with a prevalence for the β5c- and β5i-subunits22. Based on our expression analyses, in vivo application of epoxomicin to mice inhibits the abundant proteolytic βc-subunits of the c20S in podocytes and the abundant proteolytic βi-subunits of the i20S in GEnCs. We also included comparative analyses of the lysosome system by using leupeptin A as a chemical inhibitor of lysosomal serine and cysteine proteases such as cathepsin B, H and L23, hypothesizing that this should mostly affect MC proteostasis based on our histological and protein-biochemical findings. To this end, male BALB/c mice were successfully treated with the above-mentioned inhibitors over the course of 4 days (Supplementary Fig. 9), allowing us to dissect the differential effects of proteasome and lysosome inhibition on glomerular cell type proteostasis. No obvious symptoms such as diarrhea or weight loss were discernable in the 4 days of inhibitor treatment, mice with proteasome inhibition were, however, less agile and exhibited dulled fur.
In general, both inhibitors did not alter general kidney function, as blood-urea-nitrogen (BUN) levels were not elevated compared to vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 4A). However, GFB functionality and morphology were affected by proteasome but not lysosome inhibition. As such, proteasome-inhibited mice exhibited a leakiness of the GFB to albumin (Fig. 4B), as well as an enlargement of their glomerular tuft area (Fig. 4C). Quantification of podocyte numbers per glomerular tuft area depicted the presence of a relative podocytopenia in proteasome inhibition, which related to the increase in glomerular tuft area in the setting of normal absolute podocyte number (Fig. 4C). Contrasting the normal light microscopic evaluations of periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stained kidney sections of leupeptin A-treated mice, epoxomicin-treated mice demonstrated subtle changes in glomerular morphology, such as a decrease in podocyte structural integrity, cell swelling, enhanced cytoplasmic vacuolization, and less defined cell borders (Fig. 4D). Ultrastructural investigations further confirmed that podocytes were affected by proteasome inhibition, as nephrin meanders were focally broadened by high-resolution microscopy (Fig. 4E) and foot processes focally effaced by electron microscopy (Fig. 4F, panel 1) in comparison to the normal glomerular ultrastructure in vehicle control mice (Supplementary Fig. 10A). Interestingly, nephrin meanders in leupeptin A treated mice were tighter than in vehicle-treated mice (Supplementary Fig. 10B). Further, supporting the ultrastructural GFB findings of Lmp7ΔEnC mice, loss of endothelial fenestrations and focal splitting of the GBM were appreciated indicating that proteasome inhibition did not solely affect podocyte but also GEnC proteostasis. Additionally, an accumulation of electron-dense material within the GBM was noted in proteasome-inhibited mice (Fig. 4F, panel 2). Strikingly, MCs exhibited no ultrastructural alterations upon proteasome inhibition (Fig. 4G), however, upon lysosome inhibition enlarged lysosomes with electron-dense storage material were found in MCs (Fig. 4H), while podocyte and GEnC ultrastructure was unaffected (Fig. 4I).
Together, these results demonstrate that inhibition of 20S proteasome processivity causes changes in podocyte and GEnC integrity leading to functional GFB impairment.
20S alteration results in intra- and extracellular glomerular protein accumulation, which is not prevented by the autophagosome lysosome pathway
Alteration of 20S functionality in the “endothelial genetic ablation” and in the “global chemical” approach both led to an increase in cell/glomerular tuft size. As no obvious increase in glomerular cell number or cell cycle could be observed by histology, flow cytometry, or FACS-sort of glomerular cell types, this finding prompted us to hypothesize that the increase in cell/glomerular tuft size could be the result of protein accumulations due to degradative issues rather than cell proliferation. Indeed, our investigations were significant for an enhanced abundance of proteasome substrates (lysine-48-polyubiquitinated proteins) in glomeruli of proteasome-inhibited mice, which could be histologically localized specifically to podocytes in comparison to GEnCs and MCs (Supplementary Fig. 9B, C). Of note, our cumulative investigations indicate that proteostasis disturbances within podocytes of proteasome-inhibited mice were not compensated by the autophagosome-lysosome pathway (Supplementary Figs. 9 and 11). However, a firm conclusion, necessitates additional in vivo flux measurements in proteasome inhibited mice.
Intriguingly, besides the intracellular signs of altered glomerular proteostasis, an extracellular accumulation of immunoglobulin was present in glomeruli with impaired 20S function. Importantly, confocal investigations discerned mouse (ms)IgG deposition at the GFB with an accentuation underneath the slit diaphragm of podocytes only in proteasome-inhibited mice, whereas a mesangial msIgG accumulation was present in both proteasome- and lysosome-inhibited mice (Supplementary Fig. 12). As glomerular tuft swelling in the setting of glomerulonephritis is mostly the result of extracellular protein accumulation, especially of immunoglobulins24, this observation requested further in-depth analyses. For this purpose, mice received “trackable” non-immune rabbit (rb)IgG and 7 days later were treated with either vehicle, epoxomicin, or leupeptin A for four consecutive days (Fig. 5A). Protein A/G resin-mediated precipitation of rbIgG from number-adapted glomeruli showed that a significant amount of rbIgG was deposited in glomeruli of epoxomicin- and to a lesser extent of leupeptin A-treated mice (Fig. 5B). Corroborating the msIgG deposition pattern, only epoxomicin treatment resulted in a strong linear accumulation of rbIgG in the subepithelial space of the GFB, with an accentuation in areas of the slit diaphragm, whereas mesangial rbIgG deposition was comparable between both inhibitors (Fig. 5C, D, panels 1, 2).
As proteasome inhibition resulted in subepithelial immunoglobulin accumulation, we further evaluated, whether β5i-deficiency in GEnCs also resulted in altered immunoglobulin clearance from the GFB. For these investigations, the amount of msIgG was quantified via immunoblot in bulk-isolated GEnC and non-endothelial control kidney cells from Lmp7ΔEnC and control kidneys. A significant amount of msIgG was present in GEnCs derived from Lmp7ΔEnC mice compared to controls (Fig. 5E). The msIgG accumulation localized within GEnCs when co-localization was performed with Lycopersicon esculentum lectin to demarcate the endothelial glycocalyx and to the podocyte foot process protein THSD7A (Fig. 5F).
In summary, our analyses show that 20S functionality impacts glomerular intra- and extracellular protein accumulation especially of podocytes and GEnCs, with impairment resulting in glomerular tuft and GEnC swelling, relative podocytopenia and proteinuria, which are not prevented by a compensatory autophagosome-lysosome upregulation.
Proteasome functionality affects podocyte endocytosis
Immunoglobulin clearance from the GFB was affected in the setting of chemical and genetic proteolytic 20S modulation. We hypothesized that one underlying mechanism could be an altered endocytic protein clearance from the GFB. MCs are known to have a high phagocytic potential4, however, are the glomerular cell type that depends least on proteasome function. GEnC endocytic/transcytotic activity of albumin through caveolae25 is starting to be understood, and podocytes are known to exhibit an elaborate endocytic machinery related to neuronal cells26. This machinery is required for the turnover/recycling of proteins of the slit diaphragm such as nephrin27, or of immunoglobulins28, and for transcytosis of molecules such as albumin10. As proteasome impairment substantially affected podocytes and resulted in subepithelial IgG accumulation that was accentuated at the slit diaphragm, we assessed whether proteasome functionality impacted the endocytic propensity of podocytes. Indeed, pulse-chase experiments monitoring the uptake of different endocytic substrates by primary podocytes demonstrated a decreased uptake of transferrin (clathrin-mediated endocytosis29) and rbIgG (neonatal Fc receptor (FcRN) mediated endocytosis28) in the presence of epoxomicin-pretreatment (Fig. 6A and Supplementary Fig. 13). These findings were corroborated for caveolin-mediated endocytosis of FITC-albumin30 in garland nephrocytes from Drosophila (Fig. 6B), which exhibit a high similarity in morphology and molecular make-up with mammalian podocytes31 and are widely accepted as a model system to study podocyte endocytic mechanisms32. Pretreatment of nephrocytes for 15 min with epoxomicin reduced FITC-albumin endocytosis compared to vehicle, when visualized by confocal microscopy and quantified via the mean fluorescent intensity per nephrocyte area. Since proteasome inhibition affected different forms of podocyte endocytosis, live-cell imaging was performed in human podocytes to assess whether proteasome inhibition affected cellular uptake of plasma membrane, which was visualized after application of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) to the culture medium to mark membrane glycoproteins (Fig. 6C and Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). To this end, a strong reduction of endocytic plasma membrane internalization was noted over 50 min of live-cell imaging in epoxomicin-treated human podocytes. Only a few large WGA-positive vesicles were formed with a strongly reduced intracellular motility compared to the abundant number of vesicles with vivid movement in the vehicle-treated podocytes. High-resolution confocal localization of the in vivo applied WGA together with filamentous (F)-actin and lysine-48 polyubiquitinated proteins (K48-pUb) after 60 min of live-cell imaging demonstrated that proteasome inhibition preserved a strong WGA signal at the plasma membrane and at thin processes, confirming the decreased uptake of WGA-bound glycoproteins of the plasma membrane. Additionally, an accentuated signal for proteasome substrates (K48-pUb) was present at the plasma membrane and at the thin processes of proteasome-inhibited podocytes suggesting the presence of altered ubiquitination/degradation processes at the membrane (Fig. 6D).
Taken together, our results show that proteasome inhibition leads to an impairment of endocytic processes via a general alteration of plasma membrane dynamics in podocytes.
Plasma membrane abundance of endocytic receptors is modulated by proteasome functionality
We then set out to identify whether the plasma membrane recycling of endocytic receptors related to protein/immunoglobulin clearance from the GFB was modulated by proteasome functionality. IgG turnover depends on the IgG interaction with Fc receptors. To this end, expression analyses of the Fc receptor transcripts in the different glomerular cell types demonstrated that only Fcgrt, Fcgr1, and Lrp2 were expressed at a substantial level within podocytes, GEnCs, and MCs (Supplementary Fig. 14A). The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRN, encoded by Fcgrt) is essential for endocytosis and recycling of IgG and albumin and has previously been involved in glomerular IgG accumulations in a constitutive33 and a podocyte-specific28 knockout approach. Even though total FcRN transcript and protein levels were not regulated in β5i-deficient GEnCs (Supplementary Fig. 14B, C), a prominent granular/vesicular cytoplasmic FcRN localization was histologically appreciated within Lmp7ΔEnC GEnCs compared to control (Fig. 7A). Corroborating these findings, FcRN transcript levels within proteasome-inhibited glomerular cell types, as well as total glomerular FcRN protein levels were not affected (Supplementary Fig. 14D, E). Again, prominent FcRN accumulations were perinuclearly discernible by high-resolution microscopy in a vesicular/granular pattern especially in podocytes, and to a lesser extent in GEnCs (Fig. 7B). Revisiting FcRN protein abundance in bulk-isolated glomerular cell types demonstrated increased FcRN levels in proteasome-inhibited podocytes but not in GEnCs (Supplementary Fig. 14F). The in vitro pulse-chase experiments in primary podocytes of Fig. 6A additionally exhibited a perinuclear trapping of the FcRN in epoxomicin-exposed cells in comparison to vehicle-treated cells, where the FcRN trafficked to and from the cell border during the 60 min observation time (Fig. 7C). These data indicate that proteasome functionality affects IgG clearance from the GFB by altering FcRN recycling dynamics.
Besides the FcRN, we identified other, for the glomerulus hitherto unrecognized, endocytosis players to be preferentially abundant in podocytes on the protein (Supplementary Fig. 14A) and transcriptional (Supplementary Figs. 15B, C and 16) level. As such, especially the C-type mannose receptor 2 (Mrc2; also known as uPARAP, Endo180, or CD280) exhibited a substantial transcriptional regulation in podocytes and GEnCs in the setting of proteasome inhibition, with Mrc2 mRNA being reduced in podocytes and increased in GEnCs (Supplementary Fig. 16C). Mrc2 is an endocytic receptor involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling through the uptake of collagen, large collagen fragments34 and of thrombospondin 135. Our evaluations substantiated the dependence of glomerular Mrc2 protein abundance on proteasomal functionality, as transcript and protein levels of Mrc2 were reduced in proteasome-inhibited glomeruli (upper blot Fig. 7D, quantification upper graph), which localized to the cell body and foot-processes of proteasome-inhibited podocytes (Fig. 7E). The essential podocyte protein nephrin, on the other hand, whose slit diaphragm localization is extensively regulated by endocytic recycling32, showed no alterations on the total protein level (lower blot Fig. 7D, quantification lower graph) or by immunofluorescence (Fig. 7E) in proteasome inhibition. Using an established method to determine endocytosis by in vivo biotinylation of plasma membrane proteins in mice36, we could discern reduced abundances of both Mrc2 and nephrin within the biotinylated glomerular plasma membrane protein fraction of proteasome-inhibited mice (Fig. 7F), demonstrating a reduced in vivo plasma membrane-expression of Mrc2 and nephrin in podocytes. These results demonstrate that proteasome inhibition affects endocytosis of GEnC and podocytes in a complex manner, by i.e., altering total and plasma membrane levels of specific endocytic receptors, as well as their trafficking.
Taken together, our study establishes the proteasome as a central regulator of GFB functionality by orchestrating the endocytic recycling of membrane proteins such as endocytic receptors. As summarized in Fig. 8B, modulation of β5i-subunit expression in GEnCs affects the morphology of GEnCs as well as of podocytes and the GBM. Apart from accumulating immunoglobulins intracellularly, GEnCs exhibit decreased MHC-I surface levels and an intracellular retention of FcRN showing an impairment in membrane receptor recycling. Global proteasome inhibition as summarized in Fig. 8C results in functional impairment of the GFB. Podocyte proteostasis is severely affected with intracellular proteasome substrate accumulation and extracellular immunoglobulin accumulation at the slit diaphragm. Besides foot process effacement, the GBM is thickened and split, and GEnCs lose their fenestration. Surface levels of the slit diaphragm protein nephrin and of the endocytic receptor to collagen Mrc2 are decreased, as is the uptake of substrates by endocytosis. Podocyte plasma membrane dynamics and vesicle movement are reduced, demonstrating that proteasome functionality plays a crucial aspect in endocytic/recycling processes of GEnCs and podocytes which are essential for GFB permeability and maintenance. Proteasome impairment in MCs is compensated by the ALP, but compensation of proteasome impairment in podocytes is scant.
Discussion
Our findings establish the proteasome as a central component of the podocyte and glomerular endothelial cell proteostasis network to ensure glomerular filtration barrier permeability and thus functionality through the orchestration of endocytosis. The (1) conserved abundance of distinct proteolytic 20S proteasome constitutions in podocytes and GEnCs between humans and mice, (2) the development of cell-specific morphologic and functional alterations upon differential 20S proteasome modulation, and (3) the cell-specific interplay with the lysosome system, altogether illustrate the intricacies as well as the relevance of an in-depth dissection of individual cellular proteostasis principles for our basic understanding of organ function and disease pathogenesis.
Proteome perturbations induce cellular stress responses and glomerular cells are differentially affected by proteome disbalances, suggesting the existence of complex diverging proteostasis principles. For example, metabolic stress as in diabetes12, or lysosomal storage disorders affect the proteome across glomerular cell types and species to varying extents37. Our knowledge regarding the extent of these physiologic differences is scant as they can only be unraveled at the cell type level within the glomerular syncytium. This is related to the fact that cells in culture exhibit different proteostasis principles compared to when they are confined within the functional (glomerular) unit. As such, cultured mouse podocytes have an abundant lysosomal system38, which contrasts the abundant proteasome system in podocytes within the glomerular syncytium identified here. Our findings of the strong dependence of podocytes on c20S function are in conjunction with a recent study, where a podocyte-specific knockout of the 19S regulatory cap protein Rpt3 of the 26S proteasome in mice resulted in a severe and early podocyte injury phenotype39.
Illustrating the intricacies of this complex protease we find it intriguing that podocytes physiologically rely on the constitutive proteasome whereas GEnCs additionally rely on the immunoproteasome. This finding is conserved between humans and mice and thus relevant for translation. For example, the fact that GEnC health strongly depends on proteasome function yields an explanation as to why multiple myeloma patients treated with the proteasomal inhibitor carfilzomib (irreversible inhibitor of the β5c and β5i proteasomal subunits40) in phase II studies report nephrotoxic side effects including thrombotic microangiopathy, which led to the discontinuation of treatment41.
Generally, it is thought that the immunoproteasome represents a proteasome constitution with enhanced proteolytic capacity and with a different cleavage specificity which is predestined for the generation of peptides for MHC-I presentation17. In line, MHC-I membrane abundance is diminished in β5i-deficient GEnCs, as already shown for other cell types42. Whether GEnCs require the proteolytic β5i-subunit for specific endothelial-immune regulatory functions is currently under investigation. However, since the β5c-subunit (which is also capable of generating peptides for MHC-I presentation) is drastically upregulated in β5i-deficient GEnCs, we considered distinct immunoproteasome functions within GEnCs beyond antigen presentation. As such, the involvement of the immunoproteasome in the preservation of cellular proteostasis was initially demonstrated in fibroblasts in the setting of oxidative stress43. In line, the de novo expression of the immunoproteasome in the context of podocyte injury11 is thought to represent a mechanism to preserve proteostasis37,44. Hence, the strong immunoproteasome abundance and activity in GEnCs could signify a prominent physiologic need for the degradation of proteasome substrates. However, contrasting the accumulation of proteasome substrates in podocytes, no significant accumulation was appreciated in proteasome-inhibited GEnCs by immunofluorescence or in β5i-deficient GEnCs by immunoblot, which would have been expected. In β5i-deficient GEnCs, the strong compensatory upregulation of the β5c-subunit might preclude proteasome substrate accumulations by shifting their removal by the i20S toward the c20S proteasome.
At this point it is further interesting to note that glomerular endothelial homeostasis was so severely disrupted in β5i-deficiency that podocytes were also affected, even though they reside on the urinary (opposite) side of the GFB. Within the scope of glomerular cell cross-talk, podocytes secrete factors that ensure GEnC health, such as VEGF45, ephrin B246, and angiopoietin-147. It is therefore conceivable that GEnCs secrete factors such as ECM and/or signaling proteins to ensure podocyte health48 in an immunoproteasome dependent manner, as a role for the immunoproteasome in cytokine secretion has been shown20. Further, GEnCs and podocytes secrete ECM proteins for GBM synthesis and maintenance49. Hence the observed prominent GBM splitting in endothelial β5i-deficiency as well as in global proteasome inhibition could reflect an altered secretion/removal of ECM material by podocytes and GEnC in a proteasome-dependent manner, resulting in GBM alteration and subsequent podocyte disturbance.
Proteasome substrates prominently accumulated in podocytes of proteasome-inhibited mice as expected44,50, however, not in MCs and GEnCs showing that podocytes cannot balance their proteome in the setting of proteasome dysfunction. It is increasingly getting acknowledged that the autophagosome-lysosome and proteasome system interact at multiple levels to balance the cellular proteome12,13. In MCs, the strong lysosome-dependence renders this cell type unsusceptible to proteasome impairment. Podocytes, on the other hand induce the proteasome system in the initial setting of impaired autophagy51 or impaired lysosome37 function, which then successfully balances proteostasis and thus precludes GFB dysfunctions. Why here, in the reverse scenario of initial proteasome impairment the arising proteostasis disturbances in podocytes are not successfully compensated for by the autophagy-lysosome pathway, necessitates further analyses but could in part be related to a suppression of autophagic activity as demonstrated in podocyte-specific Rpt3-deficient mice39.
Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the (immuno)proteasome orchestrates endocytic turnover and thus clearance of proteins at the GFB. Of note, it is likely that a myriad of other pathways are also affected by proteosome inhibition. Interestingly, podocytes are the most affected cell type, as the injected rabbit IgG and intrinsic mouse IgG both deposit predominantly at the slit diaphragm in proteasome-inhibited mice. This deposition pattern is reminiscent of the IgG deposition described in the early phase of membranous nephropathy52, an autoimmune glomerular disease in which autoantibodies target podocyte foot process antigens53. Podocyte homeostasis is known to strongly depend on an intact endocytic system54, and the endocytic/transcytotic activity of GEnCs is starting to be understood25. Podocytes depend on endocytosis (1) for the turnover/recycling of proteins of the slit diaphragm such as nephrin27 whose membrane levels (but not total protein abundance) were affected in proteasome-inhibited podocytes in this study; (2) for the transcytosis of molecules such as albumin10 whose endocytic uptake was reduced in pulse-chase experiments of Drosophila nephrocytes in the setting of proteasome inhibition in this study; and (3) for GBM remodeling55 and maintenance56, with the GBM showing splitting and electron dense depositions in this study.
Endocytosis is orchestrated by ubiquitin at multiple node points, as essential proteins required for vesicular dynamics and vesicular fusion processes with the plasma membrane are regulated by ubiquitination/deubiquitination57. We show that the proteasome influences GEnCs and podocyte endocytosis at multiple node points as (1) clathrin as well as the non-clathrin mediated endocytosis pathways are affected, (2) as blockade of plasma membrane recycling is seen in live-imaging, and (3) as an altered expression and turnover of endocytic receptors at the membrane is present. The impact of the (immuno)proteasome on endocytosis could relate to an altered degradation of endocytosis regulating proteins such as Rab5b58 or others. Further, proteasomes have recently been described to associate with the cytosolic surface of Golgi membranes and thus be involved in Golgi-homeostasis59, hence providing a link to secretion-related pathologies. Of note, endocytosis can also be influenced by acid-base conditions i.e., downstream of PI3P generated by phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase catalytic subunit vps34, which plays a major role in podocyte endocytosis60. Therefore, the accumulation of ubiquitin and oxidized proteins in proteasome inhibited cells, could render the intracellular environment more acidic, thereby affecting endocytosis. To this end, our total transcript/protein analyses in conjunction with immunolocalization and membrane biotinylation assays could describe altered endocytic receptor localization, trafficking (neonatal Fc-receptor, FcRN), as well as membrane abundance (Mrc2) to underlie the endocytic alteration of podocytes and GEnCs with impaired proteasome functionality.
The FcRN salvages albumin and IgG from the degradative pathway by allowing their transcytosis or recycling. Both, a constitutive as well as a podocyte-specific knockout of FcRN results in glomerular size increase and IgG accumulation28,33 corroborating our observation in the setting of proteasome impairment. The enhanced FcRN accumulation in a granular/vesicular pattern within GEnCs and podocytes, as well as the perinuclear retention in primary podocytes exposed to epoxomicin shows trafficking alterations “to and from” the plasma membrane to be causative for IgG accumulation in altered proteasome-functionality. Again, cell type specific reaction patterns were present at the filtration barrier. Total FcRN transcript/protein abundance was affected in proteasome-inhibited podocytes but not in β5i-deficient or proteasome-inhibited GEnCs, affirming both cell type and proteasome constitution dependent regulatory effects. Especially β5i-deficient GEnCs exhibited a prominent intracellular mouse IgG accumulation in combination with an intracellular FcRN retention clearly showing a role of the proteasome in membrane protein recycling.
Further, we de novo identified the Mrc2 as an endocytic receptor of podocytes and GEnCs, whose total transcript/protein as well as plasma membrane abundance at the filtration barrier depends on proteasome functionality. Since the Mrc2 is crucially involved in ECM remodeling in other non-glomerular renal cell types61 through its role in the uptake of collagen, large collagen fragments34, and thrombospondin 135, our findings link the observed ultrastructural GBM alterations in proteasome impairment to the altered membrane turnover of Mrc2.
In summary, our study provides the basis for understanding the intricacies of glomerular cell type related proteostasis and drug-related renal side-effects of proteasome inhibitors in patients and establishes a role for the proteasome in endocytosis regulation and clearance of the glomerular filtration barrier from deposited proteins. Our findings pave the way for future investigations of proteostasis disturbances in the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis and may lead to new therapeutic principles to target disease-associated glomerular protein accumulations.
Methods
The presented research complies with all relevant ethical regulations of the “Behörde für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz, Amt für Verbraucherschutz, Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen, Germany”, and are conform to the requirements of the German Animal Welfare Act. Anonymous human kidney samples were derived from the healthy pool of tumor nephrectomy samples. Similar samples cannot be accessed by external users. Healthy pig kidneys were derived from the slaughterhouse Itzehoe, Germany.
Antibodies
Primary antibodies used for the study were: rabbit anti-ubiquitin (immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) 1:300, Novus, #NB300-129); guinea pig anti-nephrin (IF 1:200, Origene, #BP5030); rabbit anti-β5c (IF 1:300, WB 1:5000, laboratory stock X. Wang, University of South Dakota, USA); rabbit anti-α2 (WB 1:1000, Cell Signaling, #2455); rabbit anti-α-actinin-4 (WB 1:1000, Immunoglobe, #0042-05); rabbit anti-p62 (WB 1:2000, Sigma-Aldrich, #P0067), guinea pig anti-p62 (IF 1:500, ProGene, #GP62-c); goat anti-Mrc2 (WB 1:1000, IF 1:200 R&D Systems, #AF4789); AF488 mouse anti H2Kd-(FACS-sort 1:250, BioLegend, Clone #SF1-1.1); BV421 rat anti-CD31 (FACS-sort 1:800, BD Horizon, #562939); AF647 rat anti-CD73 (FACS-sort 1:2000, BioLegend, #127208); AF700 rat anti-CD73 (FACS-sort 1:2000, BioLegend, #127230); PE hamster anti-podoplanin (FACS-sort 1:200, BioLegend, #127408); AF700 rat anti-CD45 (FACS-sort 1:100, BioLegend, #103128); APC-Cy7 rat anti-CD45 (FACS-sort 1:100, BioLegend, #103116); FITC mouse anti-pig CD31 (IF 1:30, Bio-Rad, #MCA1746F); goat anti-biotin (WB 1:1000, Thermo Fisher, #PA1-26792); AF546 rat anti-endomucin (IF 1:50, Santa Cruz, #sc-65495); rabbit anti-K48pUb (IF 1:300, WB 1:1000, Abcam, #ab140601); rabbit anti-LC3B (WB 1:5000, IF 1:50, Cell Signaling, #3868S) rabbit anti-Limp2 (WB 1:500, IF 1:1000, laboratory stock P. Saftig, CAU Kiel, Germany), rabbit anti-Lamp2 (WB 1:1000, IF 1:300, Sigma-Aldrich, #L0668), mouse anti-human LAMP1 (IF 1:200, DSHB, # H4A3); rabbit anti-p57 (IF 1:400, Santa Cruz, #sc-8298); rhodamine-wheat germ agglutinin (IF 1:400, WGA, Vector, #RL-1022); DyLight649-lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) lectin (i.v. injection of 10 ml of a 40 µg/ml solution, Vector, #DL-1178-1); DyLight488-Phalloidin (IF 1:200, Molecular Probes, #21833); AF488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (IF 1:200, Cy2, WB 1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, #711-545-152); Cy5 donkey anti-mouse IgG (IF 1:200, Cy5, Jackson ImmunoResearch, #715-175-151); guinea pig anti-synaptopodin (IF 1:400, Synaptic Systems, #163004); goat anti-collagen 4 (IF 1:400, Southern Biotechnologies, #1340-01); mouse anti-Rpt5 (WB 1:1000, Enzo, #BML-PW8770); rabbit anti-Lmp7 ((β5i) WB 1:5000, laboratory stock E. Krüger, IF 1:300); mouse anti-β-actin (WB 1:10,000, Sigma-Aldrich, #A5441); goat anti-cathepsin D (WB 1:100, Santa Cruz, #sc-6486); rabbit anti-calreticulin (WB 1:500, Abcam, #ab92516). All secondary antibodies used were either biotinylated, HRP- or fluorescent dye-conjugated affinity purified donkey antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch). All antibodies were either validated by us, the companies or controlled for by negative and positive controls.
Animal experimentation
Mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free animal facility at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. Mice were kept at ambient temperature (20–24°C) and humidity (45–65%), had free access to water and standard animal chow (Altromin 1328P) and were synchronized to a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle.
Generation of Lmp7ΔEnC mice
Lmp7fl/fl mice were generated in C57BL/6J background by genOway (Lyon, France) by Prof. Dr. Frank Heppner, Charité Berlin, Germany. For the generation of an inducible endothelial cell-specific β5i-deficiency, Lmp7fl/fl mice were crossed to the Cdh5-Cre-ERT2 mouse line62 and fully back crossed to the C57BL/6 background. In C57BL/6 Lmp7fl/fl cre+ mice, tamoxifen application (tamoxifen, Sigma, #T5648-1G, 75 mg/kg b.w. diluted in sunflower seed oil (Sigma, #S5007-250ml) i.p. on 5 consecutive days) induces Cre-mediated excision of Lmp7 exon 3 in endothelial cells (Lmp7ΔEnC). C57BL/6 Lmp7fl/fl cre- mice exposed to tamoxifen were used as control littermates (Ctrl). The naïve phenotype of mice was analyzed 5–50 weeks after the last tamoxifen injection. Both male and female mice were included within the experiments. Genotyping was performed as follows: the different genotypes were verified by PCR. Briefly, for PCR reaction, tail biopsies were lysed in DirectPCR (Tail) (Viagen, #102-T) with proteinase K (20 mg/ml, Sigma, #P6556) overnight at 55°C. Primers for the Cdh5 cre-locus were: Cdh5-transgene-fw 5’-GCG GTC TGG CAG TAA AAA CTA TC-3’, Cdh5-transgene rev: 5’-GTG AAA CAG CAT TGC TGT CAC TT-3’; Cdh5-control-fw: 5’-CTA GGC CAC AGA ATT GAA AGA TCT-3’, Cdh5-control-rev: 5’-GTA GGT GGA AAT TCT AGC ATC ATC C-3’; for the flox-locus of Lmp7 were Lmp7-fw: 5’-GCT ATA ATG CCA GCT CTG TCT GAA CTT CG-3’, Lmp7-rev: 5’-TGC CTC TTG CAT CTC TTA GCC CAC C-3’.
Inhibitor treatment
Male BALB/c mice were purchased from Charles River. Mice were analyzed at 16–20 weeks of age. For inhibitor studies mice received the proteasomal inhibitor epoxomicin (Enzo #BML-PI127, 0.5 µg/g bodyweight) or the lysosomal inhibitor leupeptin A (Sigma #L5793, 40 µg/g bodyweight) by intra-peritoneal injection on 4 consecutive days, vehicle control mice received equal amounts (25%) DMSO in PBS. For quantification of glomerular immunoglobulin deposition, mice received 160 µl rbIgG (Bio & Sell, #RAB.SE.0100) by intra-venous injection, 7 days post rbIgG injection mice received the aforementioned inhibitors on 4 consecutive days. Animal euthanasia was performed following subcutaneous buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg KG, Indivior, #IND00979) administration for analgesia 30 min prior to cervical neck dislocation under 3.5% isoflurane inhalation narcosis. All experimental procedures were performed according to the institutional guidelines.
Sample collection, serum, and urine analysis
For sample collection, mouse urine was collected in metabolic cages. Blood was drawn from the aorta at the time of sacrifice. Mice or isolated kidney packages were thoroughly perfused either through the aorta or through the heart with 20 ml PBS to remove blood components such as immunoglobulins from the renal circulation. Successful perfusion was controlled by the color of the kidney. Samples were stored at −80°C prior to further analysis. Mouse blood was centrifuged for 10 min at 1500 × g to separate blood cells from serum. Mouse serum was analyzed for the determination of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) by standard methods using an autoanalyzer (Hitachi 717, Roche) in the Department of Clinical Chemistry at the University Hospital Hamburg. Urine albumin content was quantified using a commercially available ELISA system (Bethyl, #E99-134) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using an ELISA plate reader (BioTek), as described63. Urinary albumin values were standardized against urine creatinine values of the same individuals determined by Jaffé (Hengler analytic, #114444) and plotted.
Glomeruli isolation
Mouse glomeruli
Glomeruli were isolated using Dynabead perfusion as described64. In brief, kidneys were perfused with 5 ml magnetic bead solution per kidney (magnetic bead solution: 50 µl Dynabeads™ M-450 Tosylactivated Invitrogen Thermo Fisher #14013 with 200 µl SPHERO Polystyrene Magnetic Particles, Spherotech, #PM-40-10 diluted in 50 ml HBSS, Gibco, #14170-138) and digested with collagenase (HBSS, 1.2 mg/ml collagenase 1A (Sigma, #C9891), 100 U/ml DNase I, (Roche, #10104159001)) for 15 min, 37°C, 1300 rpm. The solution was strained through a 100 µm filter, which was rinsed with HBSS, this was done 3 times. The solution was centrifuged for 5 min, 600 × g, 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in HBSS, and the glomeruli were separated from tubuli with a magnetic particle concentrator. The number of isolated glomeruli and contaminating tubuli was quantified under the phase contrast microscope prior to storage of glomeruli at −80°C.
Pig glomeruli
Prior to the isolation of glomeruli, pig kidneys were perfused with HBSS until they were light brown in color. After separation of the cortex from the medulla, the cortical tissue was weighed and added to PBS (Gibco, #14190-169 containing 0.05% BSA (Sigma, #A7906). The tissue was then homogenized with a blender. The homogenate was sieved through a 300 µm sieve placed on a beaker and pushed through with a small Erlenmeyer flask using low pressure. To finally separate glomeruli from tubular remnants, 90 µm sieves were used whereby intact glomeruli remained on the sieve. By using a syringe filled with PBS containing 0.05% BSA, a small cannula and high pressure the glomeruli were flushed into a clean beaker. To increase the purity grade of the glomerular isolate, the last step was performed four times, using clean 90 µm sieves each time. The collected suspension was then sieved through another 212 µm sieve to eliminate remaining tissue parts. The glomeruli were centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 × g, 4°C. The number and purity of isolated glomeruli was determined under a phase contrast microscope.
Bulk-isolation of glomerular cell types
The isolation of podocytes, mesangial and endothelial cells was performed using the timMEP procedure as published19. Initially glomeruli were isolated as described above. The number of isolated glomeruli and contaminating tubuli was quantified under the phase contrast microscope. A fraction of the glomeruli was set aside as a positive control. The remaining glomeruli were processed for glomerular cell type isolation. Briefly, glomeruli were centrifuged for 5 min, 1000 × g, 4°C, the supernatant was discarded. Glomeruli were resuspended in 1 ml Liberase digest solution [(1000 µg/ml Liberase TL (Roche, #5401020001), 100 U/ml DNase I (Roche) in cell culture media (10% FCS (Gibco, #10500-064), 1% ITS (Pan-Biotech, #P07-03200), 1% Pen/Strep (Thermo, #15070063), 25 mM HEPES (Gibco, #15630056), RPMI Media 1640, (Gibco, #61870044))]. The glomeruli solution was received in a 2 ml reaction tube and incubated for 2 h, 37°C, 1400 rpm in a thermomix, while being disrupted mechanically by repeated cycles of vortexing and shearing. Following mechanical disruption, glomerular remnants were removed at the magnetic particle concentrator for 5 min. The supernatant containing the glomerular cells was collected in a 1.5 ml reaction tube. The reaction tube was topped off with MACS buffer (PBS, 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA (Sigma, #E4884) and the cells were pelleted for 10 min, 1000 × g, 4°C, the supernatant was discarded. The cells were resuspended in 100 µl MACS buffer and the FACS antibodies were added. Depending on the mouse strain used, following FACS panels were applied for separation of podocytes, mesangial cells, and glomerular endothelial cells: BALB/c: CD31, CD73, podoplanin, live/dead stain (1:1000, Invitrogen, #L10119), and CD45; Lmp7ΔEnC: CD31, CD73, podoplanin, live/dead stain, MHC-I, and CD45. FACS antibodies were incubated at 4°C for 30 min in the dark. The cells were subsequently washed with 1 ml MACS buffer and pelleted for 10 min, 1000 × g, 4°C, the supernatant was discarded, and cells were resuspended in 300 µl PBS and filtered through a 40 µm filter into FACS tubes. The collection tubes contained 100 µl PBS. Glomerular cell types were sorted at the Aria IIIu or the BD FACS Fusion sorter (Becton Dickinson). APC-Cy7 was used as dump channel to remove CD45-positive immune cells as well as dead cells from the preparations. The cells were pelleted for 10 min, 1500 × g, 4°C, the supernatant was discarded. Pellets were stored at −80°C till further use. GEnC cell size (mean FSC-A) as well as MHC-I surface expression (MFI of the respective channel) was analyzed from the data collected in the course of FACS-sorting of the glomerular cell types using FlowJo.
Cell cycle analysis via flow cytometry
Single cell suspensions were generated as described above. Cells were stained extracellularly with CD31 and live/dead stain as described above. Thereafter, cells were fixed and permeabilized with 70% EtOH overnight. Cells were washed twice with MACS buffer and subsequently stained with propidium iodide (PI, Molecular Probes,) staining solution (20 µg/ml PI, 200 µg/ml RNase A in PBS, Molecular Probes, #F10797) for 30 min at RT. Cells were diluted in PBS and analyzed at a FACS Symphony A3 (BD) flow cytometer. The PI signal was detected in the PE channel. Cell cycle analysis was performed using FlowJo 10.9.0 using “Cell Cycle” function and a pragmatic Watson model.
Cell culture
Human immortalized podocytes
Human immortalized podocytes (a kind gift of Moin Saleem, University of Bristol, Bristol, Great Britain) were cultured under permissive conditions [32°C, 5% CO2, RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1X insulin, transferrin selenium (ITS, PAN Biotech), 1 µg/ml Puromycin (Sigma, #P7255)] in uncoated, vented tissue culture flasks (Sarstedt) as described65. For differentiation, podocytes were cultured for 10 days under non-permissive conditions [38°C, 5% CO2, RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 1X ITS] for live-cell imaging as detailed below. Cell density was kept below 80–90% to allow process development. DNA was extracted from cell pellets and controlled for the absence of mycoplasma infections at a 2–3 monthly basis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Minerva Biolabs), cellular passages below 45 were used for experiments.
Primary mouse podocytes
Decapsulated glomeruli were plated on 6-well plates (Sarstedt) or onto Corning BioCoat Collagen I 35 mm TC-treated culture dishes (Corning, #354456) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 15 mmol/l HEPES, 1 mmol/l sodium pyruvate (Gibco, #11360-039), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin at 38°C, 5% CO2. Four to 6 days after initial glomerular isolation, primary culture podocytes were used for the endocytosis assay detailed below.
In vivo biotinylation and streptavidin pulldown
To quantify the in vivo abundance of nephrin and Mrc2 at the plasma membrane of glomerular cells (nota bene of podocytes, as both proteins are only expressed by podocytes within the glomerulus), in vivo biotinylation assays were performed as published66,67. In brief, kidneys were first perfused through the renal arteries with 10 ml PBSCM (PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2 (Th. Geyer, #11222620) and 0.1 mM CaCl2 (Sigma, #C-3881)) per kidney, then with 5 ml PBSCM supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Thermo Scientific, #21335) per kidney, followed by perfusion with 5 ml PBSCM + 100 mM glycine (Roth, #3908.2) per kidney as a quencher. Following in vivo biotinylation, kidneys were perfused with 5 ml Dynabead solution per kidney through the renal artery for standard glomerular isolation as described above.
Biotinylated proteins were isolated via a streptavidin pulldown. Briefly, glomerular lysates were transferred to an appropriate amount of Streptavidin Sepharose High Performance matrix (Cytiva, #17511301) and incubated over night at 4°C. The samples were centrifuged for 30 s, 300 × g, 4°C, the supernatant was collected as the flowthrough fraction. The resin was washed with wash buffer I (0.5% sodium deoxycholate (Sigma, #30970), 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma, #T8787) in PBS, pH 7.4) one time, with Neufeld buffer (0.1% SDS (Roth, #2326.2), 0.05% NP-40 (Sigma, #N3516), 0.6 M NaCl (chemSolute, #6307), 10 mM Tris/HCl (Sigma, #T1503), pH 8.5) once, with wash buffer II (0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1%Triton X-100 in PBS, 2 M KCl (Merck, #1049361000), pH 7.4) once, and lastly with 1% PBS, two times. After the last wash the supernatant was collected as wash fraction. The biotin was released from the matrix by denaturation with an equal amount of 2.5 x laemmli buffer. Samples were loaded on a SDS-PAGE under denaturing conditions for immunoblotting to Mrc2, nephrin, biotin and β-actin.
Glomerular rabbit IgG pulldown
To quantify deposited rabbit IgG in glomeruli by immunoblot analysis, glomeruli-number-adapted lysates were transferred to an appropriate amount of protein A/G resin (static binding capacity of 20 mg IgG per ml, Thermo Fisher, #53135) and incubated over night at 4°C. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min, 14,000 × g, 4°C, the supernatant was discarded. Rabbit IgG was released from the protein G resin by denaturation with an equal amount of 2 x laemmli buffer. Samples were loaded on a SDS-PAGE under denaturing conditions for immunoblotting to rabbit IgG. As the experiments depict the amount of rabbit IgG that was pulled down from the same number of glomeruli, an immunoblot loading control is technically not providable.
Quantitative PCR
Total messenger RNA was extracted from isolated glomeruli and respective FACS-sorted podocytes, mesangial cells, and endothelial cells from the corresponding mouse with the commercially available NucleoSpin RNA, Plus XS kit for RNA purification (Macherey-Nagel, #740990.250). RNA was solved in purified H2O. The whole amount of extracted RNA was reverse transcribed with random hexamer primer (Invitrogen, #SO142) and RevertAid reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific, #EP0442). The reverse transcription took place in a thermocycler (Biometra) at 25°C for 10 min, 42°C for 1 h, 70°C for 10 min, 4°C forever. mRNA expression was quantified with the QuantStudio 3 (Applied Biosystems) qPCR cycler using SYBR green. Exon spanning primer pairs to murine cDNA sequence were used (Supplementary Table 1). Relative gene expression was calculated using the ΔΔCT method.
Immunoblot analysis
All immunoblots were performed with isolated glomeruli, bulk-isolated podocytes, mesangial or endothelial cells, or primary culture podocytes. To achieve equal loading for comparative investigations, following lysis protocols were applied: (1) 5000 glomeruli were lysed in 150 µl lysis buffer, 10 µl were loaded per well. (2) Glomerular cell types were loaded in a number-adapted manner according to the individual FACS-sort cell counts. In general, for glomerular cell types that were bulk-isolated from naïve BALB/c mice, 50,000 podocytes, 50,000 mesangial cells, and 50,000 GEnCs were lysed in 10 µl lysis buffer, 10 µl were loaded per well. As all cell types differ in their expression of housekeepers a normalization to housekeeper is not possible. (3) From naïve Lmp7ΔEnC mice 50,000 GEnCs and 50,000 non-endothelial kidney cells were lysed in 10 µl lysis buffer, 10 µl were loaded per well.
For standard immunoblotting, samples were lysed in T-Per (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #78510) containing 1 mM sodium fluoride (ThGeyer, #2618.1), 1 mM sodium vanadate (Sigma, #450243-10G), 1 mM calyculin A (ThGeyer, #AB348875), Protease Inhibitor Sigma Fast, EDTA free (Sigma, #S8830) and denatured in SDS solubilization buffer. Samples were separated on a 4–12% MiniProtean TGX gel (BioRad) in a Tris-glycine migration buffer (0.25 M Tris, 1.92 M glycine, 1% SDS, pH 8.3). Protein transfer was performed in transfer buffer (0.192 M glycine, 25 mM Tris, 20% EtOH in H2O) in a TransBlot Turbo System (BioRad). After the transfer, all proteins were visualized by ponceau staining. PVDF membranes (Millipore) were blocked (5% nonfat milk) prior to incubation with primary antibodies diluted in Superblock reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or non-fat milk. Binding was detected by incubation with HRP-coupled secondary antibodies (1:10,000, 5% nonfat milk). Protein expression was visualized with ECL SuperSignal (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #34578) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on an Amersham ImageQuant 600 or 800 (GE Healthcare, Cytiva). Ponceau, β-actin, α2, or biotin stainings of the same membrane are shown, fine dashed black lines indicate, where bands were not adjacent to another on the membrane. Quantification of immunoblots was performed using FIJI version 2.0. Proteins of interest were normalized to home keepers of the same membrane, depending on the system investigated, either β-actin, ponceau, α2, or biotin were used as home keepers for normalization. GEnCs of Lmp7ΔEnC versus control littermates were not normalized to β-actin due to β-actin regulation in β5i-deficiency (Supplementary Fig. 13C, right graph). Hence, care was taken to load equal cell numbers between genotypes. Uncropped images of all gels and blots shown in the Figures are provided in the source data file.
Morphological analysis
For conventional light, confocal, and high-resolution confocal microscopy kidney cortices from experimental mice were processed as follows: (1) For standard paraffin sections, kidneys were fixed in 4% PFA (Sigma, #441244) over night at 4°C, embedded in paraffin, and cut on a rotation microtome into 1.5–3 µm thin sections and deparaffinated for staining with antigen retrieval; (2) for antigen-preservation, kidneys were fixed with zinc fixative (for 1 liter: 0.5 g calcium acetate (Sigma, #402850), 5 g zinc acetate (Sigma, #Z0625), 5 g zinc chloride (Sigma, #793523), with 0.1 M Tris all from Sigma pH 7.4) at 4°C over night, embedded in paraffin, and cut on a rotation microtome into 3 µm thick sections, and deparaffinized for staining without antigen retrieval; or (3) for cryo-sections kidneys were exposed to 30% sucrose 4°C for 6–12 h followed by freezing to −80°C in OCT cryo-protection medium, and cut on a cryostat into 5–8 µm thick sections, and post-fixed with either 4% PFA 8 min at RT, with 100% acetone (precooled to −20°C) for 5 min, or with 100% MeOH (precooled to −20°C) for 5 min.
For light microscopic evaluation, 1.5 µm thick paraffin sections were stained with periodic-acid-Schiff reagent (Sigma, #1.08033.0500) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For immunofluorescent stainings, paraffin sections were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed by steam cooker boiling for 40 min at 98°C in pH6.1 buffer (DAKO, #S2369) or pH9 buffer (DAKO, #S2367) or by protease XXIV (Sigma, #8038, 5 µg/ml) digestion 15 min at 37°C. Unspecific binding was blocked in 5% horse serum (Vector, VEC-S-2000) and 0.05% TritonX-100 for 30 min. Primary antibody incubations (in blocking buffer, o/n, 4°C) were followed by incubation with biotinylated or AF488-, Cy3-, or Cy5-coupled secondary antibodies (1:200, 30 min) together with Hoechst (1:1000, Invitrogen, #H3570). Stainings were evaluated with an LSM800 with airyscan 1 microscope (ZEISS) for conventional and high-resolution confocal microscopy and a LSM980 with airyscan 2 microscope (ZEISS) using ZEN 3.0 software (ZEISS).
Podocyte exact morphology measurement procedure (PEMP)
Quantification of filtration slit density (FSD) was performed as published67,68. In brief, 3 μm paraffin sections mounted on high-precision coverslips coated with Poly-L-lysine (Sigma, #P2636) were stained for nephrin. Stained sections were mounted with ProLong Gold (Thermo Fisher, #P10144) for imaging. 3D z-stacks from nephrin-stained kidney sections were acquired with sub diffraction limit resolution using a Visitron-SD-TIRF (with SoRa unit form Yokogawa) microscope. PEMP analysis was performed using the PEMP macro for FIJI68. For this, the capillary area was encircled, and the slit diaphragm length was determined. FSD values were calculated from the ratio of slit diaphragm length and capillary area. Per animal, 5 glomeruli with 9–22 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed.
Electron microscopy
For electron-microscopical analyses, small cortical samples were fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde with 1% glutaraldehyde (Roth, #4157.2) at 4°C for at least 24 h. Tissue was post-fixed with 1% osmium in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (1 h at RT), stained with 1% uranylacetate (1 h at RT in 70% ethanol), dehydrated and embedded in epoxy-resin (Durcupan, Sigma-Aldrich). Ultrathin sections were cut (Ultramicrotome UC6, Leica) and contrasted with lead citrate. Micrographs were generated with a transmission-electron microscope (TEM 910, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Quantification of glomerular endothelial fenestrations and foot process effacement in Lmp7ΔEnC mice was performed using ImageJ, version 1.53t.
Proteasomal activity assays
Lysate chymotrypsin-like activity assay
The main 20S core particle proteolytic activity (β5c and β5i, chymotrypsin-like activity) was measured in glomeruli as follows. Isolated glomeruli were lysed in T-Per (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with Protease Inhibitor Sigma Fast EDTA free. Protein concentration was determined by spectrophotometry (DeNovix DS-11). Ten µg total protein were diluted in incubation buffer (20 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT (Sigma, #9779), 0.1 mg/ml ovalbumin (Sigma, #A5503) in H2O, pH 7.8) to a final volume of 50 µl. Samples were pre-incubated in incubation buffer for 2 h at 4°C. Following pre-incubation, the substrate Suc-LLVY-AMC (Bachem, #4011369) was added to the samples at a final concentration of 60 µM and to an end volume of 100 µl. Proteasomal activity was measured in triplicate at 355 and 460 nm in a fluorescent spectrophotometer (Mithras LB 940) after incubation for 2 h at 37°C in the dark.
β-subunit-specific proteasomal activity assay
To measure the β-subunit-specific proteasomal activities of the 20S core particle in isolated glomerular cell types, cell types were lysed cell number adapted with TSDG buffer (10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM ATP (Sigma, #A3377) via eight freeze-thaw cycles. Samples were incubated for 1 h, 37°C with 0.5 µM MVB003 (pan-proteasomal activity-based probe, assesses activity of all proteolytic β-subunits and does not differentiate between β5c and β5i activity due to very similar molecular weight of both β-subunits) or 1 µM GB514 (β5i-specific activity-based probe). As an assay control rat hybridoma cells (which are abundant in c20S as well as i20S proteolytic β-subunits) were incubated with or without 5 µM epoxomicin for 1 h, 37°C prior to the incubation with activity-based probes. Samples were denatured in SDS solubilization buffer for 10 min at 70°C, samples were separated on a 12.5% Tris-Glycine gel in a Tris-glycine migration buffer. The activity was visualized on a Fusion FX7EDGE V0.7 Imager (Vilbert Lourmat) using the appropriate filters. Following fluorescent visualization, activity gels were blotted onto PVDF membranes and further processed for conventional immunoblotting (as described above) to proteasomal subunits and loading controls. Uncropped images of all gels and blots shown in the Figures are provided in the source data file.
Ex vivo pig glomerular proteasomal activity assay
To measure the proteasomal activity in cultured pig glomeruli, glomeruli were incubated in medium (Willams Rodium, Glutamax, 2,7 g/dl glucose, Gibco, #32551020) containing 0.5 µM MVB003 for 1 h at 37°C and 300 rpm. The immunoproteasome specific probe GB514 could not be used, as it is barely cell permeable. As an assay control, glomeruli were incubated with 2 µM epoxomicin for 1 h at 37°C and 300 rpm before adding 0.5 µM MVB003 for another hour. Incubation with an equivalent amount of DMSO served as a negative control. To stop the reaction, glomeruli were washed with PBS + 50 mM EDTA. A fraction of glomeruli was fixed with 2% PFA and stained with the cell type specific markers CD31 for GEnCs and nephrin for podocytes, washed with 3 × 5 min with PBS, applied to super-frost slides, and mounted with Fluoromount mounting medium (Southern Biotech, #0100-01) for confocal analysis. Fluorescent signal intensity demonstrates over all β-subunit activity and does not differentiate which specific β-subunit is active. A second fraction of the glomeruli was used to further control for the assay, glomerular lysates were generated by 7 consecutive cycles of freeze-thawing in TSDG buffer. Samples were denatured in SDS solubilization buffer for 10 min at 70°C, samples were separated on a 12.5% Tris-Glycine gel in a Tris-glycine migration buffer. The activity was visualized on a Fusion FX7EDGE V0.7 Imager (Vilbert Lourmat) using the appropriate filters. Following fluorescent visualization, activity gels were blotted onto PVDF membranes and further processed for conventional immunoblotting (as described above) to proteasomal subunits and loading controls. Uncropped images of all gels and blots shown in the Figures are provided in the source data file.
Lysosomal lysate activity assay
For photometric measurement of β-hexosaminidase activity in glomeruli, samples were lysed glomeruli number-adapted (T-Per containing protease inhibitor cocktail). Samples were incubated with substrate buffer (10 mM 4-nitrophenyl N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide (Sigma, #N9376), 0.1 M Na-citrate, 0.2% BSA, pH 4.6) for 1 h at 37°C. The reaction was stopped with stop solution (0.4 M glycine, pH 10.4). Activity was measured using a microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek, EL 808) at 405 nm.
Endocytosis assays
Endocytosis assay in primary culture podocytes
Isolated decapsulated glomeruli from naïve male BALB/c mice were seeded onto 6-well plates for WB analysis or onto Corning BioCoat Collagen I 35 mm TC-treated culture dishes (Corning, #354456) (1000 glomeruli per well) containing 2 ml cell culture medium (RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 1% Pen/Strep, 1 mM Sodium pyruvate, 15 mM HEPES). Primary podocytes were grown out of glomeruli over 5–6 days at 37°C, 5% CO2. Podocytes were treated with either 10 nM epoxomicin (Enzo) or vehicle (equal concentration of DMSO) for 24 h. After the 24 h of inhibitor treatment, cells were synchronized on ice for 30 min during which endocytic substrates were applied, namely transferrin-biotin (5 µg/ml, Jackson ImmunoResearch, #2337204), transferrin-FITC (5 µg/ml, Jackson ImmunoResearch, #2337209), Cy3-rbIgG (1:200) or rabbit IgG (1:200, Bio & Sell, #Rab.SE.0100). Primary podocytes were then transferred to 37°C, 5% CO2. At the indicated time points (for 0, 30 and 60 min after transfer to 37°C) primary podocytes were washed 3 times with PBS and harvested by applying 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco, #25300054). For histology the cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 8 min. Primary podocytes were pelleted for 10 min, 1000 × g, 4°C, the pellets were stored at −80°C prior to processing for conventional immunoblotting.
Live-cell imaging of human podocyte endocytic activity
Immortalized human podocytes were seeded on collagen-IV coated glass-bottom well chamber slides (Ibidi µ-Slide 8-well, #80827) in a density of 5000 cells per well. After 10 days of differentiation, cells were treated with 1 µM epoxomicin (Enzo) for 6 h or with the corresponding amount of DMSO as control. Live-cell experiments were performed at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with controlled CO2 level using a Nikon Ti2 based Spinning Disc microscope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU-W unit. Time-lapse images were acquired using a CFI Plan Apochromat λD 100x NA 1.45 oil immersion objective and an Andor iXON888 EMCCD camera (Oxford Instruments). Experiments were carried out in 4 independent imaging sessions while 8–12 individual cells were imaged per experiment and condition. Individual cells were chosen according to their morphology using brightfield imaging. Prior to the addition of rhodamine-WGA (10 µg/ml, Vector, #RL-1022) to visualize the plasma membrane as well as the internalized vesicles originating through endocytosis, a z-stack of 30 µm with a step size of 1 µm was acquired ensuring acquisition of the whole cells. Images were taken using the 561 nm excitation laser and a corresponding 609/54 bandpass emission filter. After the addition of rhodamine-WGA, automatic time-lapse and z-stack recordings were performed at 2.5-min intervals for 50 min.
After live-cell imaging (60 min after application of WGA), cells were immediately fixed with 4% PFA at RT for 20 min and washed with PBS for confocal microscopy to visualize the in culture applied rhodamine-WGA, proteasome substrates, and f-actin. For this, unspecific binding was blocked (5% horse serum (Vector Laboratories, #VEC-S-2000), 0.05% TX100, 30 min at RT) and primary antibody incubation was performed in blocking buffer overnight, 4°C. Following washes with PBS, an incubation of secondary antibodies (1:200 in blocking buffer, 1 h at RT) followed, before human podocytes were mounted in Fluoromount (Southern Biotechnology) for high-resolution confocal microscopy.
FITC-albumin uptake assay in Drosophila nephrocytes
FITC-albumin uptake assays have been performed as previously published68,69. Garland nephrocytes from 3rd instar larvae from the wildtype strain OregonR were isolated. Isolated nephrocytes were incubated with hemolymph-like buffer (HL3.1; 70 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 4 mM MgCl2, 10 mM NaHCO3, 115 mM Sucrose and 5 mM HEPES), DMSO (vehicle control) or 2 nM epoxomicin for 15 min at RT on a shaker (300 rpm). Inhibitor and vehicle were diluted in HL3.1 buffer to achieve final concentrations. After incubation, nephrocytes were washed once for 1 min with HL3.1 buffer, followed by incubation with FITC-albumin (0.2 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 min. After another washing step with HL3.1 for 1 min, nephrocytes were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min. The tissue was mounted using Prolong Gold mounting medium (Invitrogen). Confocal imaging was performed and the mean intensity/nephrocyte area was quantified using FIJI.
Transcriptomic bioinformatics
Mouse glomerular single cell transcriptomics data published by He et al.18 and human kidney single cell RNAseq data accessible within the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP, accessed 12/04/2023; https://www.kpmp.org) were analyzed for the differential expression of transcripts between podocytes, mesangial cells and glomerular endothelial cells. Data were analyzed using R 4.3.2 (R Core Team (2023). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <https://www.R-project.org/>) and Seurat V570. Glomerular cell types in the raw datasets were identified via known marker genes (Cdh5, Ehd3, and Pecam1 for GEnCs, Thsd7a and Nphs1 for PCs, Nt5e and Pdgfrb for MCs)70. Pseudobulk analysis was performed using the AggregateExpression function and heatmaps were generated using the DoHeatmap function. Heatmaps depict the relative transcript levels of podocytes, glomerular endothelial and mesangial cells from the respective dataset.
Proteomic bioinformatics
Proteomic raw data from Hatje et al.19 were reanalyzed. Protein raw files were searched using MaxQuant and the LFQ algorithm71,72 with search against a uniport mouse proteome reference database released in Jan 2018. Default criterions were used, meaning that PSM, peptide and protein FDRs were set at 0.01. LFQ algorithm was enabled, match between run was enabled. The data were analyzed using Perseus v 1.5.5.3 using filtering for the embedded annotations as contaminant, reverse or proteins identified by site only. Only proteins in at least 60% of samples were kept and missing values were imputed using default imputation parameters (downshift SD = 2, width 0.3). GO-term and uniprot keyword annotation and enrichment was performed using the embedded terms73. Radarplots were generated using ggradar package (Rstudio) using default settings. Differentially expressed proteins were defined by ANOVA with FDR-corrected p value of less than 0.01 to adjust for multiple testing.
Statistical analysis
Results were expressed as mean ± SEM, and significance was set at *p < 0.05. The means were compared using the one-way ANOVA with corresponding post hoc test for multiple comparisons, specified in the figure legends using Prism 8.2.1 for Mac OS X, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, www.graphpad.com. Replicates used were biological replicates, which were measured using different samples derived from distinct mice. All animals were littermates and were blindly assigned to the experimental groups.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (ME2108/10-1 to C.M.S.; SFB1192: project B3 to C.M.S.; KR1984/4-1 to O.K.). U.W. was supported by the graduate school iPRIME. We are grateful to the staff of the FACS Sorting Core Unit and the UKE imaging facility (UMIF) under the DFG Research Infrastructure Portal: RI_00489 for excellent technical assistance. The LSM980 Airyscan 2 was funded by the DFG (INST 152/952-1 FUGG to C.M.S.). KPMP is funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Grant numbers: U01DK133081, U01DK133091, U01DK133092, U01DK133093, U01DK133095, U01DK133097, U01DK114866, U01DK114908, U01DK133090, U01DK133113, U01DK133766, U01DK133768, U01DK114907, U01DK114920, U01DK114923, U01DK114933, U24DK114886, UH3DK114926, UH3DK114861, UH3DK114915, UH3DK114937). We acknowledge financial support from the Open Access Publication Fund of UKE—Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf—and DFG—German Research Foundation.
Author contributions
C.M.S. conceived the project, designed the experiments, performed stainings and confocal microscopy, analyzed data, supervised the project, and wrote the paper. W.S. did most of the experimental work in vivo and in vitro, work with primary podocytes, analyzed data and wrote the paper. L.B. experimented and analyzed and compiled the data of the Lmp7ΔEnC mice, performed the single cell RNAseq reanalyzes. D.L., C.C., and R.T. established, performed, and analyzed the live-imaging experiments of the human podocytes. S.K. performed endocytosis experiments in Drosophila, O.K. and D.L. performed the EM analyses. L.S. established and performed the ex vivo pig glomerular activity measurement, F.H. (UKE) and U.W. established bulk-isolated glomerular cell type samples and performed qPCR analyses. M.S., S.Z., and J.B. provided excellent technical assistance. B.I.F. provided activity-based probes and provided technical support. F.H. (Charité) generated the Lmp7fl/fl mice and E.K. provided technical support. M.M.R. performed sub analyses of the timMEP proteomic dataset19.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Shin-ichi Makino, Katalin Susztak and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-46273-0.
References
- 1.Dimke H, Maezawa Y, Quaggin SE. Crosstalk in glomerular injury and repair. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2015;24:231–238. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suh JH, Miner JH. The glomerular basement membrane as a barrier to albumin. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2013;9:470–477. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kocylowski MK, et al. A slit-diaphragm-associated protein network for dynamic control of renal filtration. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:6446. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33748-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schlondorff D, Banas B. The mesangial cell revisited: no cell is an island. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;20:1179–1187. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008050549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leeman M, Choi J, Hansson S, Storm MU, Nilsson L. Proteins and antibodies in serum, plasma, and whole blood-size characterization using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018;410:4867–4873. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1127-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Butt L, et al. A molecular mechanism explaining albuminuria in kidney disease. Nat. Metab. 2020;2:461–474. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0204-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moeller MJ, Tenten V. Renal albumin filtration: alternative models to the standard physical barriers. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2013;9:266–277. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schlondorff D. The glomerular mesangial cell: an expanding role for a specialized pericyte. FASEB J. 1987;1:272–281. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.1.4.3308611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gomez-Guerrero C, Suzuki Y, Egido J. The identification of IgA receptors in human mesangial cells: in the search for “Eldorado. Kidney Int. 2002;62:715–717. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schiessl IM, et al. Intravital imaging reveals angiotensin II-induced transcytosis of albumin by podocytes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:731–744. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014111125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Beeken M, et al. Alterations in the ubiquitin proteasome system in persistent but not reversible proteinuric diseases. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014;25:2511–2525. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013050522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Heintz L, Meyer-Schwesinger C. The intertwining of autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system in podocyte (patho)physiology. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2021;55:68–95. doi: 10.33594/000000432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meyer-Schwesinger C. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in kidney physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019;15:393–411. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0148-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meyer-Schwesinger C. Lysosome function in glomerular health and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2021;385:371–392. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03375-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Komander D, Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012;81:203–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Collins GA, Goldberg AL. The logic of the 26S proteasome. Cell. 2017;169:792–806. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huber EM, et al. Immuno- and constitutive proteasome crystal structures reveal differences in substrate and inhibitor specificity. Cell. 2012;148:727–738. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.He B, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the mesangial identity and species diversity of glomerular cell transcriptomes. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2141. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22331-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hatje FA, et al. Tripartite separation of glomerular cell types and proteomes from reporter-free mice. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021;32:2175–2193. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020091346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Basler M, Kirk CJ, Groettrup M. The immunoproteasome in antigen processing and other immunological functions. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2013;25:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kincaid EZ, et al. Mice completely lacking immunoproteasomes show major changes in antigen presentation. Nat. Immunol. 2011;13:129–135. doi: 10.1038/ni.2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim KB, Crews CM. From epoxomicin to carfilzomib: chemistry, biology, and medical outcomes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013;30:600–604. doi: 10.1039/c3np20126k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Seglen PO, Grinde B, Solheim AE. Inhibition of the lysosomal pathway of protein degradation in isolated rat hepatocytes by ammonia, methylamine, chloroquine and leupeptin. Eur. J. Biochem. 1979;95:215–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb12956.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Couser WG. Pathogenesis of glomerular damage in glomerulonephritis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 1998;13:10–15. doi: 10.1093/ndt/13.suppl_1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moriyama T, Sasaki K, Karasawa K, Uchida K, Nitta K. Intracellular transcytosis of albumin in glomerular endothelial cells after endocytosis through caveolae. J. Cell Physiol. 2017;232:3565–3573. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Soda K, et al. Role of dynamin, synaptojanin, and endophilin in podocyte foot processes. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:4401–4411. doi: 10.1172/JCI65289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Quack I, et al. beta-Arrestin2 mediates nephrin endocytosis and impairs slit diaphragm integrity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:14110–14115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602587103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dylewski J, et al. Differential trafficking of albumin and IgG facilitated by the neonatal Fc receptor in podocytes in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0209732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mayle KM, Le AM, Kamei DT. The intracellular trafficking pathway of transferrin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1820:264–281. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dobrinskikh E, Okamura K, Kopp JB, Doctor RB, Blaine J. Human podocytes perform polarized, caveolae-dependent albumin endocytosis. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2014;306:F941–951. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00532.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Weavers H, et al. The insect nephrocyte is a podocyte-like cell with a filtration slit diaphragm. Nature. 2009;457:322–326. doi: 10.1038/nature07526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lang K, et al. Selective endocytosis controls slit diaphragm maintenance and dynamics in Drosophila nephrocytes. Elife. 2022;11:e79037. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Akilesh S, et al. Podocytes use FcRn to clear IgG from the glomerular basement membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:967–972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711515105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Madsen DH, et al. Extracellular collagenases and the endocytic receptor, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein/Endo180, cooperate in fibroblast-mediated collagen degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:27037–27045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701088200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Norregaard KS, et al. The endocytic receptor uPARAP is a regulator of extracellular thrombospondin-1. Matrix Biol. 2022;111:307–328. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2022.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Woznowski MP, et al. Inhibition of p38 MAPK decreases hyperglycemia-induced nephrin endocytosis and attenuates albuminuria. J. Mol. Med. 2022;100:781–795. doi: 10.1007/s00109-022-02184-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sachs W, et al. Distinct modes of balancing glomerular cell proteostasis in mucolipidosis type II and III prevent proteinuria. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020;31:1796–1814. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019090960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rinschen MM, et al. Quantitative deep mapping of the cultured podocyte proteome uncovers shifts in proteostatic mechanisms during differentiation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016;311:C404–417. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00121.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Makino SI, et al. Impairment of proteasome function in podocytes leads to CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021;32:597–613. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019101025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Merin NM, Kelly KR. Clinical use of proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Pharmaceuticals. 2014;8:1–20. doi: 10.3390/ph8010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wanchoo R, et al. Renal toxicities of novel agents used for treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;12:176–189. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06100616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fehling HJ, et al. MHC class I expression in mice lacking the proteasome subunit LMP-7. Science. 1994;265:1234–1237. doi: 10.1126/science.8066463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Seifert U, et al. Immunoproteasomes preserve protein homeostasis upon interferon-induced oxidative stress. Cell. 2010;142:613–624. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reichelt J, et al. Non-functional ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 drives podocyte injury through impairing proteasomes in autoimmune glomerulonephritis. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:2114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37836-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Eremina V, et al. Glomerular-specific alterations of VEGF-A expression lead to distinct congenital and acquired renal diseases. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;111:707–716. doi: 10.1172/JCI17423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Takahashi T, et al. Temporally compartmentalized expression of ephrin-B2 during renal glomerular development. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2001;12:2673–2682. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V12122673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jeansson M, et al. Angiopoietin-1 is essential in mouse vasculature during development and in response to injury. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:2278–2289. doi: 10.1172/JCI46322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cohen C, et al. Glomerular endothelial cell senescence drives age-related kidney disease through PAI-1. EMBO Mol. Med. 2021;13:e14146. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Abrahamson DR, Hudson BG, Stroganova L, Borza DB, St John PL. Cellular origins of type IV collagen networks in developing glomeruli. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;20:1471–1479. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008101086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Meyer-Schwesinger C, et al. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-l1 activity induces polyubiquitin accumulation in podocytes and increases proteinuria in rat membranous nephropathy. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;178:2044–2057. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hartleben B, et al. Autophagy influences glomerular disease susceptibility and maintains podocyte homeostasis in aging mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:1084–1096. doi: 10.1172/JCI39492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Herwig J, et al. Thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A localizes to the slit diaphragm and stabilizes membrane dynamics of fully differentiated podocytes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019;30:824–839. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018090941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hoxha E, Reinhard L, Stahl RAK. Membranous nephropathy: new pathogenic mechanisms and their clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022;18:466–478. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00564-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen J, Chen MX, Fogo AB, Harris RC, Chen JK. mVps34 deletion in podocytes causes glomerulosclerosis by disrupting intracellular vesicle trafficking. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;24:198–207. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012010101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Aypek H, et al. Loss of the collagen IV modifier prolyl 3-hydroxylase 2 causes thin basement membrane nephropathy. J. Clin. Invest. 2022;132:e147253. doi: 10.1172/JCI147253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Abrahamson DR. Role of the podocyte (and glomerular endothelium) in building the GBM. Semin. Nephrol. 2012;32:342–349. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Migliano SM, Teis D. ESCRT and membrane protein ubiquitination. Prog. Mol. Subcell. Biol. 2018;57:107–135. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96704-2_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cetin G, et al. Immunoproteasomes control activation of innate immune signaling and microglial function. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:982786. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.982786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Eisenberg-Lerner A, et al. Golgi organization is regulated by proteasomal degradation. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:409. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14038-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bechtel W, et al. Vps34 deficiency reveals the importance of endocytosis for podocyte homeostasis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;24:727–743. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012070700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lopez-Guisa JM, et al. Mannose receptor 2 attenuates renal fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012;23:236–251. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011030310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wang Y, et al. Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2010;465:483–486. doi: 10.1038/nature09002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Meyer TN, et al. A new mouse model of immune-mediated podocyte injury. Kidney Int. 2007;72:841–852. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Takemoto M, et al. A new method for large scale isolation of kidney glomeruli from mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2002;161:799–805. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64239-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Saleem MA, et al. A conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell line demonstrating nephrin and podocin expression. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:630–638. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V133630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Haase R, et al. A novel in vivo method to quantify slit diaphragm protein abundance in murine proteinuric kidney disease. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0179217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Konigshausen, E. et al. Isolation of glomeruli and in vivo labeling of glomerular cell surface proteins. J. Vis. Exp. 10.3791/58542 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 68.Koehler S, et al. Proteome analysis of isolated podocytes reveals stress responses in glomerular sclerosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020;31:544–559. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019030312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hermle T, Braun DA, Helmstadter M, Huber TB, Hildebrandt F. Modeling monogenic human nephrotic syndrome in the Drosophila garland cell nephrocyte. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017;28:1521–1533. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016050517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hao Y, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023 doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cox J, et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2014;13:2513–2526. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.031591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tyanova S, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Source data are provided with this paper.