Abstract
Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper transcription factor (bHLH-Zip), has been identified as a melanocyte-specific transcription factor and plays a critical role in melanocyte survival, differentiation, function, proliferation and pigmentation. Although numerous studies have explained the roles of MITF in melanocytes and in melanoma development, the function of MITF in the hematopoietic or immune system—beyond its function in melanin-producing cells—is not yet fully understood. However, there is convincing and increasing evidence suggesting that MITF may play multiple important roles in immune-related cells. Therefore, this review is focused on recent advances in elucidating novel functions of MITF in cancer progression and immune responses to cancer. In particular, we highlight the role of MITF as a central modulator in the regulation of immune responses, as elucidated in recent studies.
Subject terms: Tumour immunology, Drug development
MITF: The Unexpected Regulator of Immune Responses in Cancer
Understanding the role of a gene named MITF in diseases and immune responses is vital, as its functions are not fully understood. MITF is known to affect our skin color and the development of melanoma. However, its involvement in other diseases and its impact on our immune system are still under investigation. This study investigates how MITF interacts with immune cells, and how it might influence treatments for diseases like melanoma. The key findings reveal that MITF has a complex relationship with the immune system. The researchers propose that understanding MITF’s role in the immune system could lead to improved treatments for cancer and other diseases. They believe that targeting MITF might enhance the efficacy of current therapies and assist in developing new ones. The potential future implications of this research could be significant for improving patient outcomes in various diseases.
This summary was initially drafted using artificial intelligence, then revised and fact-checked by the author.
Introduction
Since the discovery of the role of MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) in melanogenesis, the function of MITF has been reported in the context of several diseases, mostly in melanin-related diseases and melanoma1–3. However, the correlations of MITF expression with immune responses in patients with immunological diseases or cancers, including melanoma, and with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used to treat various tumor types have recently been investigated (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. The schematic shows the multiple roles of MITF.
MITF has been implicated in numerous immunological events in immune-related diseases, including cancer; the ICI response; and the differentiation, function and recruitment of immune cells (e.g., T cells, B cells, NK cells, MDSCs, osteoclasts and mast cells).
Association of MITF expression with the progression of cancer and other diseases
There is strong evidence indicating that MITF is involved in several diseases, including cancer, although the precise mechanisms and roles of MITF in these diseases remain largely unclear. Indeed, MITF expression has been observed in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and it has been reported that high MITF expression in macrophages is associated with poor overall survival4. Copper plays a critical role in several biological processes involved in normal growth, development and immune responses and is associated with several diseases, including cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, MEDNIK syndrome and Menkes disease5. Mast cells (MCs) contain numerous highly electron-dense secretory granules, and the abundance of these granules is increased in several pathological conditions. The release of β-tryptase from these secretory granules is a hallmark of mast cell degranulation. Interestingly, copper inversely regulates the expression of MITF and its downstream target, the tryptase gene (Mcpt6), by inducing ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Notably, an increase in the number of tryptase-positive mast cells (MCs) in the skin and low copper levels in serum have been observed in patients with MEDNIK syndrome6.
In melanoma, MITF expression affects the recruitment of immune cells, including T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells and myeloid cells, by altering the levels of chemokines and cytokines and ultimately altering therapeutic efficacy7,8. Similarly, increased infiltration of T cells, cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), NK cells and B cells has been found in MITFhigh/PTENpos melanoma patients9. In addition, MITF has been associated with NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in melanoma10. MITF promotes immune escape by inducing the expression of ADAM10, which is a direct target of MITF. ADAM10 is critical for cleavage of the NKG2D ligands MICA and MICB, which leads to reduced NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. On the other hand, it has also been reported that MITF expression in melanoma induces NK cell cytotoxicity by inhibiting integrin beta-like protein 1 (ITGBL1) expression, which is increased in MITF-low melanoma cells and in patients with resistance to anti-PD1 therapy11. Furthermore, HVEM (Herpes Virus Entry Mediator; also known as TNFRSF14), a member of the TNF receptor superfamily (TNFRSF), is expressed on various types of cells: T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), NK cells and myeloid cells. HVEM interacts with BTLA (B and T lymphocyte attenuator), and activation of this axis triggers inhibitory signals in T cells to suppress antitumor immunity and is associated with poor prognosis in patients with several cancers. In addition, BTLA+ CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are crucial for the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy in metastatic melanoma patients. In addition to showing a strong correlation with MITF expression in the skin cutaneous melanoma dataset in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), HVEM expression was recently shown to be strongly correlated with the expression of specific molecules upstream or downstream of MITF. In addition, MITF knockdown by siRNA reduced the expression of HVEM in melanoma cell lines and patient-derived melanoma cells12,13.
Although the relationship between MITF and PD-L1 in cancer cells remains unclear14–16, some evidence suggests that MITF is critical for nonresponse to ICI therapy in melanoma patients17,18. It has been reported that MITF is frequently expressed in the BRAF-mutant subtype of cutaneous melanoma, as determined by TCGA data analysis. Interestingly, the “MITF-low” cluster of cells in that study exhibited low expression of genes associated with immunomodulation, adhesion, migration, the extracellular matrix and proper pigmentation. Furthermore, enrichment of microRNA (miR)-100-5p and miR-125b-5p was detected in the “MITF-low” cluster of melanoma samples in TCGA, and among the evaluated tumor patients, the expression of these miRs was higher in the immunotherapy responders than in the nonresponders15,18. In addition, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-induced enzyme, promotes the infiltration of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Although IDO inhibitors lead to a reduction in solid tumor progression in the context of immunotherapy, they show limited therapeutic efficacy when administered in combination with anti-PD-1 antibodies. IDO1 inhibitors restore tryptophan and MITF levels, which are reduced in melanoma cells, and lead to the loss of susceptibility of these cells to the antitumor effect of T-cell-derived IFN-γ. Indeed, the expression levels of MITF and its target genes were found to be inversely correlated with the IFN-γ expression level in a TCGA melanoma cohort, and patients with tumors that responded well to immunotherapy had lower levels of MITF and the MITF target genes than patients with nonresponding tumors19. MiTF/TFE translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) is a rare subtype of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC), and patients with tRCC have poorer outcomes than patients with other RCC subtypes. However, the effects of ICIs on tRCC are contradictory, and limited data are available12,20.
MRGPRX2 is a G protein-coupled seven transmembrane domain receptor that is expressed mainly in MCs and neurons. MRGPRX2 is associated with skin immunity, pain and adverse drug reactions. Recently, MRGPRX2 activation with substance P was shown to promote the nuclear translocation of lysyl t-RNA synthetase (LysRS) and induce MITF activation. Furthermore, several drugs known to mediate MRGPRX2-dependent degranulation, including atracurium, vancomycin and morphine, induce MITF activity. These results demonstrate that MITF and MITF-dependent targets may be therapeutic targets for pathologies associated with MRGPRX23.
These findings increase our understanding of the interaction between MITF and the immune system and may provide valuable insights for the development of cancer therapies.
MITF in immune cells
MITF is expressed in nonmelanoma cell types and influences their development and function. MITF is associated with cells of the osteoclast lineage, including osteoclast precursors, monocytes and macrophages. Stimulation of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), a key signaling pathway protein that promotes osteoclast development, increases MITF expression and induces osteoclastogenesis21,22. The interactions between MITF and osteoclast-specific genes, such as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and cathepsin K (Ctsk), are essential for osteoclast differentiation and function23,24. MITF is also involved in MC development through the mast cell protease (MCP), granzyme B, tryptase and c-kit signaling pathways, which are required for MC activation25–27. In addition, the MITF inhibitor ML-329 has been shown to alter calcium influx and MC degranulation3. The role of MITF in maintaining the mature and quiescent state of B cells has also been demonstrated. Disruption of MITF expression induces B-cell differentiation into plasma cells and increases autoantibody production via inhibition of IRF4 expression28. Mutant MITF can also reduce NK cell activity by inhibiting perforin transactivation29. Recent evidence suggests that MITF is expressed predominantly in tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) to regulate their differentiation and immunosuppressive functions30. Although numerous studies have investigated the mechanisms underlying MITF expression, the effects of MITF signaling pathways on immune cell development have not been fully elucidated. In this context, we further discuss the role of upstream and downstream molecules in MITF signaling pathways, especially in myeloid cells and other immune cells.
The upstream regulators of MITF in myeloid cells
MITF is involved in numerous cellular mechanisms through its transcriptional activity, and its function is affected by various signaling pathways and upstream molecules, including the Wnt pathway, CREB, MC1R, ATF4, BRAF, PAX3, IL-6 and TGF-β31. Interestingly, many of these pathways and molecules are known to have immunological functions in various immune cells and immune-related diseases (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. The schematic shows MITF upstream molecules and their immunological activities.
MITF upstream molecules such as Wnt/LEF-1, α-MSH/MC1-R and CREB are known to have immunological functions in various immune cells and immune-related diseases. (AML acute myeloid leukemia/CML chronic myeloid leukemia).
Wnt signaling and MITF expression
The Wnt signaling pathway is one of the major pathways regulating MITF expression through the nuclear mediators, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF-1)/T-cell factor (TCF) transcription factors32. Wnt signaling is activated in human myeloid leukemia, and the Wnt signaling mediator LEF-1 plays an important role in leukemogenesis. Furthermore, nuclear localization of β-catenin is frequently observed in human leukemia patients, and LEF-1 is critical for the nuclear localization of β-catenin in both AML cell lines and primary AML blasts. Overexpression or constitutive activation of Lef-1 in mouse bone marrow leads to profound disruption of hematopoietic cell differentiation and to the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)33,34. In addition, LEF-1 expression has been shown to be increased in CD34+ bone marrow cells and peripheral blood cells from patients with blast crisis (BP) of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)35. In contrast, depletion of LEF-1 was found to result in defective granulopoiesis in the context of congenital neutropenia. LEF-1 is an essential protein for neutrophil granulopoiesis because it regulates proper cell lineage commitment and granulocyte differentiation and proliferation via the actions of cyclin D1, c-myc, survivin and C/EBPα, downstream effectors of MITF31,36,37. It was also observed that Wnt1 induced the expression of CD36 after TCF and PPAR-γ activation, leading to the differentiation of human peripheral blood monocytes into macrophages38.
Cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) is a key regulator
The activation of cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB), a basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor, is induced by an elevated cAMP level, and CREB functions as a key regulator of MITF expression32. CREB plays various roles in immune cells, including macrophages, DCs, neutrophils, T cells and B cells, via regulation of cell proliferation, survival, differentiation and activity and is associated with many diseases39,40. Transgenic (TG) mice with myeloid-specific overexpression of CREB spontaneously develop skin abscesses or dermatitis, and neutrophils have been observed in mice with preputial gland abscesses. In these mice, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity is increased in neutrophils, but neutrophil migration is not altered. In addition, overexpression of CREB in myeloid cells leads to altered cytokine levels. Overexpression of CREB reduces keratinocyte-derived cytokine (KC) and interleukin (IL)-1β levels while inducing IL-1RA, IL-10 and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), which is associated with macrophage chemotaxis and function and the differentiation of progenitor cells into bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), in CREB TG mice41. Interestingly, CREB-1 expression is upregulated during macrophage differentiation, and CREB phosphorylation by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) induces the expression of PU-Ets related-1 (PE-1)/Mitogenic Ets transcriptional suppressor (METS), which contributes to growth arrest by reducing the transcription rate of cell cycle-controlling genes. Furthermore, expression of a dominant negative form of CREB-1 in bone marrow progenitors results in reduced expression of CD54 and impairs cell adhesion42. It has also been reported that CREB is activated in primary human macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), an intracellular human pathogen, and induces immune evasion and bacterial growth by reducing the fusion of Mtb-containing phagosomes and lysosomes43. Recently, it was reported that the neuronal guidance protein netrin-1 produced in MC38 murine colon cancer cells promotes the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs. Netrin-1 binds to adenosine receptor 2B (A2BR), the receptor for netrin-1, on the surface of MDSCs, and this netrin-1/A2BR axis induces the suppressive effect of MDSCs on T-cell proliferation by activating the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA)/CREB signaling pathway. In addition, MDSC infiltration is reduced in netrin-1-knockdown MC38 tumor-bearing mice44. Similarly, CREB-2/ATF4 has been shown to be necessary for the polarization and maturation of macrophages and MDSCs in both humans and mice. The general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) kinase promotes the expression of CREB-2/ATF4 and induces the acquisition of an immunosuppressive phenotype by TAMs and MDSCs in the TME. In addition, B16F10 cell-inoculated mice with myeloid-specific GCN2 knockout (B6.Gcn2fl/flxLyz2+/Cre mice) exhibit decreased infiltration of TAMs and increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells, NK cells and NKT cells45. In dendritic cells, the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 is induced by CREB activation through a C-type lectin receptor-mediated signaling pathway46. Moreover, CREB affects inflammatory cytokine production in neutrophils and granzyme C expression in MCs47,48. Like Wnt signaling, CREB signaling affects the development of AML49. CREB is highly expressed in AML patients and is activated by the scaffolding adapter Gab2 via the SHP-2/Erk pathway. In addition, the selective CREB inhibitor 666-15 reduces the migration of THP-1 human AML cells by inhibiting the expression of MMP2 and MMP9, which are downstream targets of CREB50.
Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1-R) and MITF
Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1-R) is expressed mainly in melanocytes, and the MC1R/cAMP/MITF axis plays an important role in the growth, survival and differentiation of melanocytes and melanoma cells. However, many reports have shown that MC1-R is expressed on leukocytes and antigen-presenting cells (APCs), including monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, DCs, cytotoxic T cells, B lymphocytes and monocytic cell lines such as THP-1 and RAW264.7, and plays important roles in immune responses and inflammatory diseases. MC1-R exerts anti-inflammatory effects on all major forms of inflammation, including acute, chronic systemic, allergic and CNS inflammation, and is activated by its ligand, α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), which is produced through the posttranslational processing of proopiomelanocortin (POMC)51–53. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease caused by uncontrolled cholesterol accumulation and chronic inflammation within the arterial wall, and it is associated with increased recruitment of circulating leukocytes, particularly monocytes, to inflamed arteries. Rinne et al. reported a positive correlation between MC1-R expression on macrophages and the expression of the reverse cholesterol transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1 in atherosclerotic lesions in both humans and mice. α-MSH/MC1R activation induces cholesterol efflux and reduces cholesterol uptake by BMDMs, which is a counterregulatory response to foam cell formation, and increases the levels of ABCA1 and ABCG1. In addition, treatment with the selective MC1-R agonists LD211 and MSG606 reduces lipid accumulation in BMDMs. These results suggest that targeting MC1-R on macrophages is a possible atherosclerosis therapy54. A single-base deletion mutation in the MC1R gene(Mc1re/e) in mice was found to exacerbate atherosclerosis by disrupting cholesterol and bile acid metabolism and by inducing arterial recruitment of proinflammatory Ly6Chigh monocytes55.
The downstream effectors of MITF in myeloid cells
HIF-1α as a downstream effector of MITF
The expression of numerous target genes, including those that encode proteins involved in cell cycle arrest, proliferation, cell survival, oxidative stress, metastasis and invasion, is controlled by MITF. MITF transcriptionally regulates the expression of several downstream effectors, including AP-1, HIF and C/EBP31 (Fig. 3). We recently discovered that altered MITF expression in MDSCs downregulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression and stimulates T-cell proliferation30. HIF-1α is a central transcription factor that modulates cellular responses to hypoxic conditions and plays critical roles under a variety of physiological and pathological conditions39. HIF-1α is a key molecule downstream of MITF and is directly influenced by MITF at the transcriptional level56. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that HIF-1α regulates myeloid cell differentiation and function. The HIF-1α level is increased in tumors, and HIF-1α increases the expression of arginase 1 (Arg1) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS or NOS2) in MDSCs57. Furthermore, HIF-1α is a direct regulator of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), which is associated with the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs and induces MDSC-mediated decreases in T-cell function and proliferation58. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1α plays an important role in the polarization of macrophages into M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)59. In addition, low oxygen levels affect the differentiation and maturation of DCs. Several studies have shown that HIF-1α induces DC-mediated inflammation and chemokine receptor type 7 (CCR7)-mediated migration of myeloid DCs (mDCs)60–62. In contrast, exposure to hypoxia has been shown to either inhibit or exert no effect on the proinflammatory function of DCs63,64. The HIF-1α level is also elevated in activated neutrophils65. A neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) is a web-like structure composed of chromatin and antimicrobial proteins released by activated neutrophils to trap and kill pathogens. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1α promotes NET formation and increases NET release66. AML is a complex hematological malignancy characterized by abnormal proliferation and impaired differentiation of myeloid progenitor cells. In AML, HIF-1α plays a key role in the dysregulation of myeloid cell differentiation. Altered HIF-1α expression and activity have been observed in AML cells and contribute to the disruption of myeloid cell differentiation. HIF-1α can interfere with the expression and function of key transcription factors involved in myeloid cell differentiation, such as PU.1, C/EBPα and Runx167,68. Several strategies for pharmacologically targeting HIF-1α to restore normal myeloid cell differentiation in the context of AML have been reported. In patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the combination of HIF-1α inhibitors with differentiation-inducing agents such as all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) or arsenic trioxide (ATO) may have synergistic effects on promoting myeloid cell differentiation and improving treatment outcomes69,70.
Fig. 3. Schematic of MITF downstream targets and their role in myeloid cells.
Many of the MITF downstream effectors (e.g., HIF-1α, GPNMB, C/EBPα and IRF4) are associated with the differentiation and functions of immune cells, including macrophages, MDSCs, DCs and neutrophils.
GPNMB (DC-HIL) and MITF
Glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB, a DC-associated transmembrane protein; also known as DC-HIL/osteoactivin) is an endogenous type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein that was initially shown to be highly expressed in melanoma cell lines with low metastatic capacity71. MITF has also been identified as a key regulator of GPNMB expression in DCs. Treatment of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) with small molecule inhibitors of MITF reduces GPNMB expression at both the mRNA and protein levels, suggesting that GPNMB expression is promoted by MITF activation72. Interestingly, GPNMB expression is greatly increased by IL-10 and BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib), which are used to treat CML73. In addition, IL-10 induces the activation of MITF, which inhibits the activity of the transcription factor NF-κB, resulting in its inactivation. This inhibition of NF-κB activation reduces the production of costimulatory molecules, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and IL-1273,74. Therefore, anti-GPNMB treatment induces the expression of CD80, CD86 and C/EBP in DCs and increases the production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α. In addition, GPNMB inhibition may prevent T cells from binding to syndecan-4 (SD-4), resulting in increased T-cell activity75. Understanding the effects of GPNMB on surface marker expression and cytokine production may provide insights into its role in regulating DC-mediated immune activation and tolerance. The migration and homing of DCs to lymphoid organs are essential for the inhibition of immune responses. Studies suggest that GPNMB may affect the ability of DCs to migrate. The expression of the chemokine CC motif ligand (CCL19) and CCR7, which are important for DC migration into tissues, is regulated by GPNMB expression on DCs. In addition, GPNMB affects the expression of adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix components involved in DC migration and interactions with lymphoid tissues75. Thus, understanding the effects of GPNMB on DC migration and homing is expected to provide insights into its potential role in altering immune cell dynamics and immune surveillance.
GPNMB is expressed on macrophages and is more abundant on M2 macrophages than on M1 macrophages. GPNMB promotes M2 polarization, suggesting that it may facilitate the resolution of inflammation76. Although many studies have suggested that GPNMB may function as an anti-inflammatory molecule by promoting the resolution of inflammation, there is evidence suggesting that it may promote inflammation. Hence, the function of GPNMB in inflammation remains unclear. Several studies have shown that the GPNMB level is elevated in tissues under inflammatory conditions, such as those caused by LPS treatment, and in pathological contexts, such as neurodegenerative diseases and cancer71. There is also evidence that a novel paracrine axis comprising GPNMB and IL-33 is activated by interactions between macrophages and tumor cells, ultimately promoting tumor cell survival, cancer stem cell expansion and metastasis development77. In addition, GPNMB is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms and has been identified as a target gene of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2). Since EZH2-mediated H3K27me3 modification is associated with gene silencing, when EZH2 is suppressed in macrophages, the GPNMB level is elevated, resulting in macrophage polarization toward the M2 type. However, EZH2 knockout reduces neutrophil recruitment and impairs bacterial clearance76,78. Intriguingly, GPNMB is expressed on CD14+ M-MDSCs and binds SD-4, which is expressed on T cells, to effectively inhibit T-cell activation79. Since increasing T-cell activity by blocking MDSC function is an attractive approach for cancer immunotherapy, after GPNMB was identified as a T-cell inhibitory receptor that mediates the suppressive function of MDSCs, the potential of anti-GPNMB mAbs as MDSC-targeted cancer therapeutics has been evaluated in several studies80.
C/EBPα activity modulated by MITF
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) is a transcription factor belonging to the leucine zipper (LZ) family. C/EBPα is essential for myelopoiesis, and its function has been shown to be inhibited by MITF. It is encoded by the CEBPA gene and is expressed as the C/EBPαp42, C/EBPαp30 and C/EBPαLZ isoforms81,82. C/EBPα functions as a transcriptional activator or repressor depending on the target gene and the cell in which it is expressed. C/EBPα is critical for the maturation of myeloid progenitor cells into granulocytes and monocytes during hematopoiesis, but in the context of AML, altered C/EBPα expression disrupts this process, leading to the accumulation of immature myeloid cells and blockade of cell differentiation. Previous studies have revealed CEBPA open reading frame (ORF) mutations in 10-15% of AML patients83. The expression of C/EBPα is decreased in AML patients, possibly as a result of various mechanisms, such as epigenetic alterations, transcriptional dysregulation or deregulation of signaling pathways. In contrast, increased expression of C/EBPα has been observed in some AML patients due to chromosomal rearrangements or alterations in regulatory elements84,85. Therefore, pharmacological approaches, gene therapy and genetic manipulation may be used to restore C/EBPα function and promote myeloid differentiation. Numerous studies in which C/EBPα is targeted with a combination of therapeutic agents have reported promising results for the treatment of AML. Synergistic effects have been observed when agents such as HDACis or DNMTis that restore the expression of C/EBPα signature genes are combined with other targeted agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or inhibitors of signaling pathways associated with AML86–88. Increasing C/EBPα expression via treatment with small molecules in combination with anticancer drugs can be used to treat AML. Recently, MTL-CEBPA, a small activating RNA drug that increases the C/EBPα level, was shown to promote myeloid cell differentiation into neutrophils and contribute to the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine production89.
Upregulation of C/EBPα expression exerts anticancer effects by inhibiting the activity of suppressive myeloid cells, such as monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) and TAMs90. C/EBPα cooperates with other transcription factors, such as PU.1 and IRF8, to promote the differentiation of progenitor cells into the macrophage lineage91. C/EBPα influences macrophage polarization by regulating the production of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Knockdown of C/EBPα in macrophages induces their polarization into M1 macrophages, which are characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β92. C/EBPα expression is also downregulated in the early stages of MDSC development, when these cells acquire immunosuppressive properties. C/EBPα and C/EBPβ form heterodimers and bind to the promoter regions of genes such as Arg1 and iNOS, which are associated with the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs93. Strategies to control C/EBPα activity in MDSCs may increase antitumor immune responses in cancer. In addition, combining C/EBPα modulation with other therapeutic approaches, such as anti-PD-1 therapy, may enhance the efficacy of these treatments by reducing the immunosuppressive effects mediated through the tumor microenvironment94,95.
IRF4 and MITF
Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) has been reported to regulate the differentiation and function of MDSCs. Inhibition of IRF4 expression in MDSCs can lead to increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules, such as Arg1, iNOS, IL-10 and TGF-β. In addition, MDSCs lacking IRF4 suppress T-cell proliferation96. Interestingly, IRF4 is a known transcriptional target that is repressed by MITF28. IRF4 can affect the expression of cell surface molecules, including PD-L1, on MDSCs. IRF4-mediated PD-L1 downregulation prevents T-cell exhaustion and attenuates immune tolerance through the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway. Furthermore, IRF4 can affect the levels of inflammatory factors, including IL-1α and IL-10, thereby modulating the immunosuppressive microenvironment96,97. Targeting these proteins that cooperate through their interactions may provide therapeutic opportunities to modify MDSC function and restore immune homeostasis in patients with diseases characterized by MDSC-mediated immune dysregulation.
IRF4 is involved in the polarization of macrophages into different types with distinct functions. IRF4 expression is often downregulated in M1 macrophages, promoting the expression of M1-specific genes involved in proinflammatory responses. IRF4 can be mechanistically inhibited by IRF5, which promotes M1 polarization. IRF4 inhibition is also associated with the upregulation of TNF-α, IL-1β, iNOS and CCL2, which promote macrophage polarization toward the M1 phenotype. IRF4 promotes the differentiation of monocytes into M2 macrophages by regulating the expression of M2-related genes and production of cytokines, including Arg1, Fizz1, Ym1, IL-10 and IL-498,99. In addition, IRF4 influences the phenotypic and functional changes that occur during DC maturation. In DCs, IRF4 inhibits the production of IFN-γ and IL-12, which control Th1 immune responses100,101. IRF4 expression is also required for the maturation of conventional type 2 DCs (cDC2s) and affects DC migration involved in T-cell priming102. IRF4 also affects the development and survival of intestinal CD103+CD11b+ DCs, which are involved in antimicrobial defense103. The novel functions of IRF4 in DCs can be leveraged for cancer immunotherapy, providing new therapeutic interventions. Targeting IRF4 is expected to enhance DC-mediated antitumor immune responses, stimulate the priming of tumor-specific T cells and inhibit immunosuppressive mechanisms mediated through the TME.
MITF cofactors in myeloid cells
The differentiation and function of myeloid cells are controlled by a complex network of transcription factors. PU.1 is an ETS family transcription factor that plays multiple roles in hematopoiesis. It is a direct regulator of myeloid cell, DC and B-cell functional programs and a well-characterized molecule in terminal erythroid cell differentiation. MITF and PU.1 have emerged as key players in myeloid cell development. They play an essential role in monocyte differentiation into macrophages and function cooperatively to increase the expression of target genes, such as Ctsk, acid phosphatase 5 (Acp5), c-Fos and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc1), during osteoclast differentiation104. They also function in concert with Eomesodermin (EOMES) to regulate the activity of transcription factors important for osteoclast differentiation. This action is accomplished by the binding of MITF and PU.1 to the promoter region of the gene, where transcription factors regulate the expression of the gene105. PU.1 is essential for cDC maturation and function and inhibits plasmacytoid DC (pDC) differentiation by directly activating the expression of DC-SCRIPT (Zfp366)106. In addition, PU.1 plays a critical role in DC migration to secondary lymphoid organs by inducing the expression of CCR7. In fact, it has been reported that PU.1 regulates CCR7 expression in both mouse and human DCs by binding to the Ets motif107.
MITF also binds to NFATc1, which regulates myeloid cell differentiation and immune responses. NFATc1 has been previously shown to be expressed in T cells, MCs and osteoclasts and to regulate the action of several transcription factors. In particular, NFATc1 is important for IL-2 and IL-4 production in T cells. Interestingly, NFATc1 is also expressed in MDSCs and has been shown to enhance the immunosuppressive function of MDSCs via its effect on IDO expression induced by treatment with cyclosporine (CsA), a calcineurin inhibitor. The NFAT inhibitory peptide VIVIT has also been shown to inhibit T-cell differentiation by promoting the suppressive activity and recruitment of MDSCs108. In addition, NFATc1 has been shown to be expressed in mouse MCs and to be involved in MC survival and apoptosis by binding to the IL-13 and TNF-α promoters, activating the expression of the respective genes109.
Conclusion
Previously, MITF was shown to be a key gene regulator involved in melanocyte and melanoma cell functions, affecting skin color regulation, melanoma growth, immunity and melanoma progression. However, recent studies suggest that the role of MITF may extend beyond melanoma cells and melanocytes to other cell types. MITF regulates the differentiation and function of several immune cells in addition to osteoclasts, including MDSCs, and as a transcription factor, it is involved in immune responses via its regulation of multiple signaling pathways through interactions with various partners. Although various studies have reported MITF expression in different cell types, the mechanism underlying its function, as well as its precise role in immune cells, are still unclear. In this review, we focused on identifying representative upstream and downstream signaling mediators of MITF that modulate immune responses mediated by various hematopoietic cells. In particular, MITF has been shown to play an important role in regulating the differentiation and immunosuppressive function of MDSCs in the TME. MITF expression induced by soluble factors in the TME increases the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs, especially M-MDSCs, promotes MDSC differentiation and inhibits CD8+ T-cell proliferation. These effects may be associated with poor survival in breast and lung cancer patients, and modulation of MITF expression may be a breakthrough strategy to restore T-cell activity and increase the efficacy of anticancer therapy30. Unfortunately, although the expression and function of MITF in various diseases and immune cells have been actively studied, research on the use of MITF as a therapeutic target was lacking until recently, and inhibitors targeting MITF have not been developed. Thus, a better understanding of the interactions between MITF and the immune system may help to improve the clinical benefits and the long-lasting effects on immune regulation or antitumor immune responses.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (NRF-RS-2023-00207857 and RS-2023-00237729). J.L. was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (2022R1I1A1A01063959).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Aram Lee, Jihyun Lim.
References
- 1.Liu JJ, Fisher DE. Lighting a path to pigmentation: mechanisms of MITF induction by UV. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2010;23:741–745. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148X.2010.00775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yasumoto K, Yokoyama K, Shibata K, Tomita Y, Shibahara S. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor as a regulator for melanocyte-specific transcription of the human tyrosinase gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:8058–8070. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Guo Y, et al. MRGPRX2 signaling involves the lysyl-tRNA synthetase and MITF pathway. Front. Immunol. 2023;14:1154108. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1154108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carreras J, et al. High PTX3 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2021;113:334–348. doi: 10.1111/cas.15179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garza NM, Swaminathan AB, Maremanda KP, Zulkifli M, Gohil VM. Mitochondrial copper in human genetic disorders. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2023;34:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hu Frisk JM, Kjellén L, Kaler SG, Pejler G, Öhrvik H. Copper regulates maturation and expression of an MITF:tryptase axis in mast cells. J. Immunol. 2017;199:4132–4141. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wiedemann GM, et al. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) regulates immune cell migration into melanoma. Transl. Oncol. 2019;12:350–360. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Riesenberg S, et al. MITF and c-Jun antagonism interconnects melanoma dedifferentiation with pro-inflammatory cytokine responsiveness and myeloid cell recruitment. Nat. Comun. 2015;6:8755. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cabrita R, et al. The role of PTEN loss in immune escape, melanoma prognosis and therapy response. Cancers. 2020;12:742. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sánchez-del-Campo L, et al. MITF induces escape from innate immunity in melanoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;40:117. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01916-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cheli Y, et al. ITGBL1 is a new immunomodulator that favors development of melanoma tumors by inhibiting natural killer cells cytotoxicity. Mol. Cancer. 2021;20:12. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01306-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ballotti R, Cheli Y, Bertolotto C. The complex relationship between MITF and the immune system: a melanoma immunotherapy (response) factor? Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:170. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01290-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haymaker CL, et al. BTLA marks a less-differentiated tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subset in melanoma with enhanced survival properties. OncoImmunology. 2015;4:e1014246. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1014246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vučinić D, et al. PD-L1 expression is regulated by microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) in nodular melanoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2022;229:153725. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Akbani R, et al. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell. 2015;161:1681–1696. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang N, et al. SA-49, a novel aloperine derivative, induces MITF-dependent lysosomal degradation of PD-L1. EBioMed. 2019;40:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang H, et al. Targeting Wnt/β-Catenin signaling exacerbates ferroptosis and increases the efficacy of melanoma immunotherapy via the regulation of MITF. Cells. 2022;11:3580. doi: 10.3390/cells11223580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sloane RAS, et al. Identification of microRNA–mRNA networks in melanoma and their association with PD-1 checkpoint blockade outcomes. Cancers. 2021;13:5301. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kenski JCN, et al. An adverse tumor-protective effect of IDO1 inhibition. Cell Rep. Med. 2023;4:100941. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bersanelli M, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-conventional histologies of renal-cell carcinoma. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2023;19:2171672. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2171672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mansky KC, Sankar U, Han J, Ostrowski MC. Microphthalmia transcription factor is a target of the p38 MAPK pathway in response to receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:11077–11083. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111696200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oppezzo A, Rosselli F. The underestimated role of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiTF) in normal and pathological haematopoiesis. Cell Biosci. 2021;11:18. doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00529-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luchin A, et al. The microphthalmia transcription factor regulates expression of the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase gene during terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2000;15:451–460. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.3.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pang M, et al. AP-1 and Mitf interact with NFATc1 to stimulate cathepsin K promoter activity in osteoclast precursors. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019;120:12382–12392. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morii E, et al. Importance of leucine zipper domain of mi transcription factor (MITF) for differentiation of mast cells demonstrated using mi(ce)/mi(ce) mutant mice of which MITF lacks the zipper domain. Blood. 2001;97:2038–2044. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.7.2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kitamura Y, Morii E, Jippo T, Ito A. Effect of MITF on mast cell differentiation. Mol. Immunol. 2002;38:1173–1176. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(02)00058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Takemoto CM, Yoon YJ, Fisher DE. The identification and functional characterization of a novel mast cell isoform of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:30244–30252. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201441200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin L, Gerth AJ, Peng SL. Active inhibition of plasma cell development in resting B cells by microphthalmia-associated transcription factor. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200:115–122. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ito A, et al. Inhibitory effect on natural killer activity of microphthalmia transcription factor encoded by the mutant mi allele of mice. Blood. 2001;97:2075–2083. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.7.2075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee A, et al. Novel role of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in modulating the differentiation and immunosuppressive functions of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2023;11:e005699. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goding CR, Arnheiter H. MITF-the first 25 years. Genes Dev. 2019;33:983–1007. doi: 10.1101/gad.324657.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Werno C, et al. Knockout of HIF-1alpha in tumor-associated macrophages enhances M2 polarization and attenuates their pro-angiogenic responses. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1863–1872. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Petropoulos K, et al. A novel role for Lef-1, a central transcription mediator of Wnt signaling, in leukemogenesis. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:515–522. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Morgan RG, et al. LEF-1 drives aberrant beta-catenin nuclear localization in myeloid leukemia cells. Haematologica. 2019;104:1365–1377. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.202846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sengupta A, et al. Deregulation and cross talk among sonic hedgehog, Wnt, Hox and Notch signaling in chronic myeloid leukemia progression. Leukemia. 2007;21:949–955. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Skokowa J, et al. Interactions among HCLS1, HAX1 and LEF-1 proteins are essential for G-CSF-triggered granulopoiesis. Nat. Med. 2012;18:1550–1559. doi: 10.1038/nm.2958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Skokowa J, et al. LEF-1 is crucial for neutrophil granulocytopoiesis and its expression is severely reduced in congenital neutropenia. Nat. Med. 2006;12:1191–1197. doi: 10.1038/nm1474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang S, et al. Wnt1 positively regulates CD36 expression via TCF4 and PPAR-gamma in macrophages. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015;35:1289–1302. doi: 10.1159/000373951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012;148:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chowdhury MAR, An J, Jeong S. The Pleiotropic Face of CREB Family Transcription Factors. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:399–413. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wen AY, et al. Increased abscess formation and defective chemokine regulation in CREB transgenic mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sawka-Verhelle D, et al. PE-1/METS, an antiproliferative Ets repressor factor, is induced by CREB-1/CREM-1 during macrophage differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:17772–17784. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311991200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Leopold Wager CM, et al. Activation of transcription factor CREB in human macrophages by Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes bacterial survival, reduces NF-kB nuclear transit and limits phagolysosome fusion by reduced necroptotic signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19:e1011297. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xia X, et al. Netrin-1 promotes the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2023;11:600–613. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Halaby MJ, et al. GCN2 drives macrophage and MDSC function and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Sci. Immunol. 2019;4:eaax8189. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aax8189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lu X, Oh-Hora M, Takeda K, Yamasaki S. Selective suppression of IL-10 transcription by calcineurin in dendritic cells through inactivation of CREB. Int. Immunol. 2022;34:197–206. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxab112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mayer TZ, et al. The p38-MSK1 signaling cascade influences cytokine production through CREB and C/EBP factors in human neutrophils. J. Immunol. 2013;191:4299–4307. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Phair IR, Sumoreeah MC, Scott N, Spinelli L, Arthur JSC. IL-33 induces granzyme C expression in murine mast cells via an MSK1/2-CREB-dependent pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2022;42:BSR20221165. doi: 10.1042/BSR20221165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cho E-C, Mitton B, Sakamoto K. CREB and leukemogenesis. Criti. Rev. Oncog. 2011;16:37–46. doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.v16.i1-2.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gong R, et al. Gab2 promotes acute myeloid leukemia growth and migration through the SHP2-Erk-CREB signaling pathway. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022;112:669–677. doi: 10.1002/JLB.2A0421-221R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kadiri JJ, et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor deficiency in hematopoietic cells promotes the expansion of inflammatory leukocytes in atherosclerotic mice. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:774013. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.774013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Luger TA, Scholzen TE, Brzoska T, Bohm M. New insights into the functions of alpha-MSH and related peptides in the immune system. Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci. 2003;994:133–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Herraiz C, Martínez‐Vicente I, Maresca V. The α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone/melanocortin‐1 receptor interaction: A driver of pleiotropic effects beyond pigmentation. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021;34:748–761. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rinne P, et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor signaling regulates cholesterol transport in macrophages. Circulation. 2017;136:83–97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rinne P, et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor deficiency promotes atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E (−/−) mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018;38:313–323. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Busca R, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is a new target of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) in melanoma cells. J. Cell Biol. 2005;170:49–59. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200501067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Corzo CA, et al. HIF-1alpha regulates function and differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:2439–2453. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Noman MZ, et al. PD-L1 is a novel direct target of HIF-1alpha, and its blockade under hypoxia enhanced MDSC-mediated T cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 2014;211:781–790. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sun JL, et al. Tumor cell-imposed iron restriction drives immunosuppressive polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. J. Transl. Med. 2021;19:347. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03034-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bosco MC, et al. Monocytes and dendritic cells in a hypoxic environment: Spotlights on chemotaxis and migration. Immunobiology. 2008;213:733–749. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu J, et al. CCR7 chemokine receptor-inducible lnc-Dpf3 restrains dendritic cell migration by inhibiting HIF-1alpha-mediated glycolysis. Immunity. 2019;50:600–615.e615. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.McGettrick AF, O’Neill LAJ. The role of HIF in immunity and inflammation. Cell Metab. 2020;32:524–536. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Smith V, et al. Hypoxia is associated with increased immune infiltrates and both anti-tumour and immune suppressive signalling in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:8956. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Paardekooper LM, et al. Hypoxia potentiates monocyte-derived dendritic cells for release of tumor necrosis factor alpha via MAP3K8. Biosci. Rep. 2018;38:BSR20182019. doi: 10.1042/BSR20182019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Sieow JL, et al. Conditional knockout of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha in tumor-infiltrating neutrophils protects against pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:753. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li J, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps induced by the hypoxic microenvironment in gastric cancer augment tumour growth. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023;21:86. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01112-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Song LP, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha-induced differentiation of myeloid leukemic cells is its transcriptional activity independent. Oncogene. 2008;27:519–527. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhang J, Chen GQ. Hypoxia-HIF-1alpha-C/EBPalpha/Runx1 signaling in leukemic cell differentiation. Pathophysiology. 2009;16:297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Coltella N, Valsecchi R, Ponente M, Ponzoni M, Bernardi R. Synergistic leukemia eradication by combined treatment with retinoic acid and HIF inhibition by EZN-2208 (PEG-SN38) in preclinical models of PML-RARalpha and PLZF-RARalpha-driven leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:3685–3694. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Deynoux M, Sunter N, Herault O, Mazurier F. Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in leukemias. Front. Oncol. 2016;6:41. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Saade M, Araujo de Souza G, Scavone C, Kinoshita PF. The role of GPNMB in inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:674739. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.674739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ripoll VM, et al. Microphthalmia transcription factor regulates the expression of the novel osteoclast factor GPNMB. Gene. 2008;413:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2008.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Gutknecht M, et al. The transcription factor MITF is a critical regulator of GPNMB expression in dendritic cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 2015;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s12964-015-0099-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bonham CA, et al. Marked prolongation of cardiac allograft survival by dendritic cells genetically engineered with NF-kappa B oligodeoxyribonucleotide decoys and adenoviral vectors encoding CTLA4-Ig. J. Immunol. 2002;169:3382–3391. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.6.3382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chung JS, et al. Binding of DC-HIL to dermatophytic fungi induces tyrosine phosphorylation and potentiates antigen presenting cell function. J. Immunol. 2009;183:5190–5198. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhou L, et al. Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein b (Gpnmb) is highly expressed in macrophages of acute injured kidney and promotes M2 macrophages polarization. Cell Immunol. 2017;316:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liguori M, et al. The soluble glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) produced by macrophages induces cancer stemness and metastasis via CD44 and IL-33. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:711–722. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0501-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kitchen GB, et al. The histone methyltransferase Ezh2 restrains macrophage inflammatory responses. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21843. doi: 10.1096/fj.202100044RRR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Colombo MP. Is GPNMB the achilles’ heel of mo-MDSC while marking their suppressive activity? Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:453–454. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kobayashi M, et al. Blocking monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell function via anti-DC-HIL/GPNMB antibody restores the in vitro integrity of T cells from cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:828–838. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Avellino R, Delwel R. Expression and regulation of C/EBPalpha in normal myelopoiesis and in malignant transformation. Blood. 2017;129:2083–2091. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-687822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Qi X, et al. Antagonistic regulation by the transcription factors C/EBPalpha and MITF specifies basophil and mast cell fates. Immunity. 2013;39:97–110. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wakita S, et al. Prognostic impact of CEBPA bZIP domain mutation in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6:238–247. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Heyes E, et al. Identification of gene targets of mutant C/EBPalpha reveals a critical role for MSI2 in CEBPA-mutated AML. Leukemia. 2021;35:2526–2538. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01169-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jakobsen JS, et al. Mutant CEBPA directly drives the expression of the targetable tumor-promoting factor CD73 in AML. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaaw4304. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw4304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Liss A, et al. The gene signature in CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein alpha dysfunctional acute myeloid leukemia predicts responsiveness to histone deacetylase inhibitors. Haematologica. 2014;99:697–705. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.093278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Blagitko-Dorfs N, et al. Combination treatment of acute myeloid leukemia cells with DNMT and HDAC inhibitors: predominant synergistic gene downregulation associated with gene body demethylation. Leukemia. 2019;33:945–956. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0293-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Esposito CL, et al. Targeted systematic evolution of an RNA platform neutralizing DNMT1 function and controlling DNA methylation. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:99. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35222-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Zhou J, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of MTL-CEBPA, a small activating RNA drug, in LPS-stimulated monocytes and humanized mice. Mol. Ther. 2019;27:999–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hashimoto A, et al. Upregulation of C/EBPalpha inhibits suppressive activity of myeloid cells and potentiates antitumor response in mice and patients with cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;27:5961–5978. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pundhir S, et al. Enhancer and transcription factor dynamics during myeloid differentiation reveal an early differentiation block in cebpa null progenitors. Cell Rep. 2018;23:2744–2757. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lee B, et al. C/EBPalpha regulates macrophage activation and systemic metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;306:E1144–E1154. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00002.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Mackert JR, et al. Dual negative roles of C/EBPalpha in the expansion and pro-tumor functions of MDSCs. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12968-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sarker D, et al. MTL-CEBPA, a small activating RNA therapeutic upregulating C/EBP-alpha, in patients with advanced liver cancer: a first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase I rrial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:3936–3946. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Huang KW, et al. MTL-CEBPA combined with immunotherapy or RFA enhances immunological anti-tumor response in preclinical models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:9168. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nam S, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) controls myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) differentiation and function. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016;100:1273–1284. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1A0215-068RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Yang Q, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 4 regulates the development of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells through the transcription of c-myc in cancer. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:627072. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.627072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Al Mamun A, et al. Microglial IRF5-IRF4 regulatory axis regulates neuroinflammation after cerebral ischemia and impacts stroke outcomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:1742–1752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914742117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Mougiakakos D, et al. The IKZF1-IRF4/IRF5 axis controls polarization of myeloma-associated macrophages. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2021;9:265–278. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Williams JW, et al. Transcription factor IRF4 drives dendritic cells to promote Th2 differentiation. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2990. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Akbari M, et al. IRF4 in dendritic cells inhibits IL-12 production and controls Th1 immune responses against leishmania major. J. Immunol. 2014;192:2271–2279. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Camacho DF, et al. IRF4 expression by lung dendritic cells drives acute but not Trm cell-dependent memory Th2 responses. JCI Insight. 2022;7:e140384. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pohl JM, et al. Irf4-dependent CD103(+)CD11b(+) dendritic cells and the intestinal microbiome regulate monocyte and macrophage activation and intestinal peristalsis in postoperative ileus. Gut. 2017;66:2110–2120. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Sharma SM, et al. MITF and PU.1 recruit p38 MAPK and NFATc1 to target genes during osteoclast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:15921–15929. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609723200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Carey HA, et al. Eomes partners with PU.1 and MITF to regulate transcription factors critical for osteoclast differentiation. iScience. 2019;11:238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Chopin M, et al. Transcription factor PU.1 promotes conventional dendritic cell identity and function via induction of transcriptional regulator DC-SCRIPT. Immunity. 2019;50:77–90.e75. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Yashiro T, et al. PU.1 plays a pivotal role in dendritic cell migration from the periphery to secondary lymphoid organs via regulating CCR7 expression. FASEB J. 2019;33:11481–11491. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900379RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wang X, et al. The calcineurin-NFAT axis controls allograft immunity in myeloid-derived suppressor cells through reprogramming T cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015;35:598–609. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01251-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Klein M, et al. Specific and redundant roles for NFAT transcription factors in the expression of mast cell-derived cytokines. J. Immunol. 2006;177:6667–6674. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.6667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



