Abstract
Objective:
Cancer is caused by abnormal growth and disruption of homeostatic mechanisms. Breast cancer is a major health problem and the second leading cause of death in women. Capecitabine is a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, which is a non-cytotoxic agent and is used to treat advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cytidine deaminase (CDA) plays an important role in the activation of capecitabine by acetylating 5-deoxycytidine in the liver, which ultimately leads to the formation of 5-fluorouracil. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between cytidine deaminase polymorphism and capecitabine efficacy in breast cancer patients.
Methods:
One hundred breast cancer patients aged 45 to 75 years were included in this study, all of whom received capecitabine as monotherapy. The serum levels of CA15.3, calcium, and estradiol E2 in breast cancer patients were investigated. In addition, the relationship of these markers with cytidine deaminase polymorphism was investigated in order to show the association of cytidine deaminase polymorphism with capecitabine efficacy in breast cancer patients.
Result:
The findings of this study showed that there is a statistically significant relationship between CDA enzyme polymorphisms (rs2072671 and rs532545) with estradiol and CA15.3 serum levels and a non-significant relationship with calcium level. Furthermore, patients who participated were highly polymorphic and heterozygotes genotypes had the highest frequency in both rs2072671 and rs532545 polymorphisms.
Conclusion:
The results obtained from the present study identified different genetic polymorphisms in the gene encoding the CDA enzyme. Overall, our results clearly showed direct evidence for the association of cytidine deaminase polymorphism with the efficacy of capecitabine in breast cancer patients, which could be useful in reducing side effects and improving drug response to capecitabine.
Key Words: Cytidine deaminase, capecitabine, breast cancer, polymorphism
Introduction
Breast cancer is a major health problem and the second leading cause of death in women (Wilkinson and Gathani, 2022). Breast cancer is a type of metastatic cancer that can spread to other organs such as the lung, liver, bone, and brain. Causes of breast cancer include genetic, environmental, dietary, lifestyle, and hormonal factors (Łukasiewicz et al., 2021). Capecitabine was specifically designed for oral administration, to deliver 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to the tumor site and to avoid systemic 5-FU exposure. Oral capecitabine is highly effective for the management of breast and colorectal cancer (Kaklamani and Gradishar, 2003; Shankar et al., 2015). By using a three-step enzymatic cascade, the innovative oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate capecitabine (Xeloda) preferentially produces 5-FU in tumor tissue. The prodrug capecitabine is quickly and completely digested after being absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract in its intact form (Reigner et al., 2003). It undergoes a three-step enzymatic cascade to become 5-FU. It is first converted to 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5′-DFCR) by hepatic carboxyl esterase. This is then changed to 5′ deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5′ DFUR) by the enzyme cytidine deaminase. Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is an enzyme that converts 5′ DFUR into 5-FU in both tumor and healthy tissues (Schellens, 2007; Varma et al., 2019).
The CDA gene, which has four exons, is found on the first pair of chromosomes and codes for the human CDA enzyme (1p36.2-p35). The active site of CDA is composed of four identical subunits, each of which must contain a zinc atom. Although the liver and placenta are where it is mostly produced, mature neutrophils also contain significant amounts of CDA (Cambi et al., 1998). Cytidine and 2-deoxycytidine are physiologically deaminated into uridine and 2-deoxyuridine, 65, respectively, by this enzyme. Due to the significant inter-individual variation in CDA’s period of action, it is of great interest (Serdjebi et al., 2015) . In terms of CDA, the promoter region mutations CDA c.-451C>T (rs532545) and CDA c.-33delC (rs3215400, also known as c.-943del/insC) have been linked to altered enzyme activity. Those who carry the CDA T-allele c.-451C>T showed increased CDA enzymatic activity and a higher incidence of grade 2 diarrhea. In these patients, the likelihood of grade 3 HFS was similarly elevated. Decreased mRNA expression was caused by CDA c.-33delC, which is closely related to CDA c.-451C>T, and carriers of the C-insertion variant had a lower chance of grade 3 HFS. The enzymatic activity of CDA in serum has been recommended as a reasonable biomarker for the metabolic conversion rate of capecitabine in addition to genotyping analysis of CDA. An ultra-metabolizing condition was linked to higher capecitabine efficacy or extreme toxicity (Carpi et al., 2013; de With et al., 2023).
Serum levels of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) are monitored periodically in breast cancer patients throughout the course of treatment (Duffy et al., 2010). CA15-3 may be useful in estimating the extent to which breast cancer has spread. An elevated level of CA15-3 would suggest the presence of metastases, particularly bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases may find it helpful to examine CA15-3 as a prognostic factor (Abed et al., 2020). However, no research has linked CA15-3, a tumor marker, to CDA enzyme genetic variation.
Many studies have examined the correlation between rising serum estrogen levels and the onset of breast cancer (Saha Roy and Vadlamudi, 2012). Most human breast cancers begin as estrogen-dependent, suggesting a role for estrogen signaling and the estrogen receptor (ER) in cancer growth. Hormone receptor-positive tumor cells have estrogen or progesterone receptors (Chakravarty et al., 2010). Hypercalcemia is a common consequence of breast cancer and a major source of morbidity and mortality from the disease. Patients with multiple skeletal metastases are especially at risk. However, in a sizeable subset of patients, elevated calcium levels develop even in the bones and joints illness (DeMauro and Wysolmerski, 2005; Erdogan and Cicin, 2014). When serum calcium levels are over 10.5 mg/dl and albumin levels are under 4 g/dl, a condition known as hypercalcemia develops (Hadisuwarno et al., 2021). When chemotherapy is given to patients with hypercalcemia due to breast or lung cancer, the calcium levels decrease, most likely due to a decrease in PTHrP level (Hassan et al., 2012).
The pro-drug capecitabine is activated by 3 enzymatic activities to -DFCR and subsequently -DFUR. Thymidine phosphorylase (TP), the final enzyme in the process of converting thymidine to 5-FU, is specific to tumors and is selectively upregulated by capecitabine. In contrast, 5-FU is inactivated by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) (Innocenti et al., 2020). Different polymorphisms (P) of the enzymes involved in the metabolism of capecitabine may be responsible for the varying efficacy and toxicity in patients receiving the drug (Roberto et al., 2017). Overall, in this study, we aimed to investigate the serum levels of CA15.3, calcium, and estradiol E2 in breast cancer patients and the association of CDA polymorphism with capecitabine effectiveness in breast cancer patients.
Materials and Methods
This study was done at Imam Hussein Medical/Oncology Center in Karbala province. The study is cross cross-sectional observation study that begins from 1 July 2022 to 1 January 2023. The study’s protocol was approved by the Pharmacy College’s Scientific and Ethical Committee at Karbala University, and all participants signed a consent form indicating that they understood the purpose and nature of the research. One hundred breast cancer patients, ages 45 to 75, were enrolled in this trial, all of whom were receiving capecitabine as monotherapy.
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria involved women aged from 45 to 75 years and with adequate organ function taking capecitabine as monotherapy for treating breast cancer
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation, serious infection, and women taking capecitabine as combination or adjuvant therapy with another chemotherapy.
Sample collection and analysis
After obtaining permission from the Scientific and Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Pharmacy / Karbala University, 5 ml of blood samples were taken from patients, 2 ml were placed in an EDTA tube for genetic analysis and 3 ml were placed in a gel tube, and then at a speed of 4000 rpm for centrifuged for 10 minutes for biochemical analysis such as calcium, estradiol E2 and tumor marker CA 15.3.
Primer’s design
The primers used in this study were designed by Oligo7 software. Table 1-1 shows forward primer and reverse primer sequence used for CDA K27Q genotyping (rs2072671).
Table 1-1.
Primer Sequences used for CDA K27Q Genotyping (rs2072671)
Primer | Sequence | Tm (°C) |
---|---|---|
(A) Forward (common) | 5′-CCTTCCAGTAGCGTGGCACCAC-3 | 71.82 |
(B)Reverse (K*-specific) | 5′GACTGTAGGGGCAGTAGGCTGACTT-3′ | 68.36 |
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in three independent experiments. The data of this research was analyzed with SPSS software and using a t-test. The variable mean value and standard division (SD) value were collected from patients with p-value less than 0.05 which means the data is statically significant.
Results
Table 2 shows the demographic data for the individuals who participated in this study. The age range at breast cancer diagnosis was 45-75 years, with a mean of 55.136; and the body mass index was 26-32; individuals who had a family history of breast cancer were about 62%; while the ratio of married women was 86%, whereas unmarried women were just 14%; And the percentage of women with left side breast cancer was about 33%, while on the right side it was about 67%. The percentage of patients who had surgery (mastectomy, lumpectomy with or without lymph node removal) was 90%; the percentage of individuals who had estrogen receptor-positive was about 94%, and only 6% were progesterone positive; and 39% of patients in this study had lymph node involvement; The proportion of females who had radiation therapy was 88%, whereas 12% of females did not receive radiation therapy; and the percentage of patients who took chemotherapy was 92%, whereas 8% didn’t take chemotherapy, and the percentage of patients suffering from hand-foot syndrome, one of the serious side effects of capecitabine, was 53%.
Table 2.
The Demographic Data of the Participated Individuals in This Study
Age of patients with breast cancer | Percentage | |
Marital status | Married | 86% |
Single | 14% | |
Family history | Positive | 62% |
Negative | 38% | |
location of breast cancer | Left | 33% |
Right | 67% | |
Receptor status | Estrogen receptor positive | 94% |
Progesterone receptor positive | 6% | |
Lymph node involvement | Yes | 39% |
No | 61% | |
Radiation therapy | Yes | 88% |
No | 12% | |
Surgery | Yes | 90%; |
No | 10% | |
Hand foot syndrome | Yes | 53% |
No | 47% |
CA15.3 tumor marker concentration in breast cancer patients with cytidine deaminase enzyme polymorphism
The CA15.3 levels and the cytidine deaminase enzyme polymorphism are shown in Table 3. The majority of patients (around 45%) have tumor marker levels that are higher than the normal range (less than 30 U/mL).
Table 3.
Mean and Standard Division of CA 15.3 for each Group of SNIPS rs532545and rs2072671 Small Letter Alphabetic Represent Correlation between each Genotype
SNIP | Genotype | Frequency | Mean ±SD | *P value |
rs2072671 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 30 | 93.09± 30.57 d | 0.027 |
AC (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 65.89± 13.97 b | ||
CC (homozygote, mutant type) | 22 | 117.77± 36.41 a | ||
rs532545 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 40 | 71.83± 21.22 b | 0.046 |
AG (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 106.76± 31.33 a | ||
GG (homozygote, mutant type) | 12 | 66.08± 19.02 b |
* p value if a-0.05< significant p>0.05 non-significant difference
Regarding rs532545, the mutant (GG) has a CA15.3 (mean +/- SD) of (66.08± 19.02), which exceeds the normal range, followed by the heterozygous (AG) with a value of (106.76± 31.33), and the wild type (AA) with a value of (71.83± 21.22), and there is no significance between heterozygous with mutant, heterozygous with homozygous, and mutant with homozygous, respectively.
Concerning rs2072671, the mutant (CC) has a CA15.3 (mean +/- SD) of (117.77± 36.41) which exceeds the normal range, followed by the heterozygous (AC) with a value of (65.89± 13.97) and the wild type (AA) with a value of (93.09± 30.57), and there is no significant difference between the three groups.
Estradiol level in breast cancer patients with cytidine deaminase enzyme polymorphism
Table 4 illustrates the estradiol levels of breast cancer patients. Postmenopausal women often have estradiol levels between 10 and 50 pg/ml.
Table 4.
Mean and Standard Division of Estradiol Level for each Group of SNIPS rs532545and rs2072671, Small Letter Alphabetic Represent Correlation between each Genotype
SNIP | Genotype | Frequency Frequency | Mean ±SD | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
rs2072671 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 30 | 51.89± 10.42 a | 0.057 |
AC (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 53.98± 10.96a | ||
CC (homozygote, mutant type) | 22 | 41.01± 10.78b | ||
rs532545 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 40 | 74.43± 14.86a | 0.044 |
AG (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 33.08± 3.72b | ||
GG (homozygote, mutant type) | 12 | 37.98± 3b |
p value if a-0.05< significant p>0.05 non-significant difference
Specifically, for rs2072671, the mutant (CC) has an elevated estradiol level (mean +/- SD) of (41.01 ± 10.78), the heterozygous (AC) has a value of (53.98 ± 10.96), and the wild type (AA) has a value of (51.89 ± 10.42), with a statistically significant difference between the three groups.
Concerning rs532545, the mutant (GG) has an elevated estradiol level (mean +/- SD) of (37.98 ± 3), the heterozygous (AG) has a value of (33.08 ± 3.72), and the wild type (AA) has a value of (74.43 ± 14.86), with significant differences between the heterozygous and mutant and homozygous genotypes.
Calcium level in breast cancer patients with cytidine deaminase enzyme polymorphism
Table 5 illustrates the calcium levels of this study’s breast cancer patients who also possessed a CDA enzyme polymorphism. Postmenopausal women often have estradiol levels between 8.4 - 11.5 mg/dl. Relating to rs532545, the mutant (GG) has a calcium level (mean +/- SD) of (8.82 ± 0.1), followed by the heterozygous (AG) with a value of (8.93 ± 0.12), and the wild type (AA) with a value of (9.09 ± 0.16); there is no significance between heterozygous with mutant, heterozygous with homozygous, and mutant with homozygous.
Table 5.
Mean and Standard Division of Calcium Level for each Group of SNIPS rs532545 and rs2072671 and, Small Letter Alphabetic Represent Correlation between each Genotype
SNIP | Genotype | Frequency | Mean ±SD | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
rs2072671 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 30 | 8.75± 0.12 a | 0.247 |
AC (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 9.11± 0.15 a | ||
CC (homozygote, mutant type) | 22 | 8.99± 0.08 a | ||
rs532545 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 40 | 9.09± 0.16 a | 0.481 |
AG (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 8.93± 0.12 a | ||
GG (homozygote, mutant type) | 12 | 8.82± 0.1 a |
* p value if a-0.05< significant p>0.05 non-significant difference
Regarding rs2072671, the mutant (CC) has a CA15.3 (mean +/- SD) of (8.99± 0.08), followed by the heterozygous (AC) with a value of (8.99± 0.08) and the wild type (AA) with a value of (8.75 ± 0.12), and there is no significance difference between the three groups.
The genetic poly morphism of cytidine deaminase enzyme in breast cancer patients
The genetic diversity of rs532545 (451 A>G) in patients with breast cancer
Table 6 shows the percentage and number of SNIP rs532545 genotypes found in patients with breast cancer on capecitabine. The most common genotype among the 100 breast cancer patients enrolled in this study was (AG) heterozygous with 42 numbers of patients and 42% percentage; while the wild type was homozygous with frequent numbers of 40 and a percentage of 40%, and the mutant type, which has a lower frequency and percentage, was 18% percentage and frequently 18.
Table 6.
Percentage and Frequency of Cytidine Deaminase Enzyme SNIP (rs532545) Genotype in Breast Cancer Patients
SNIP | Genotype | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
rs532545 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 40 | 40% |
AG (Heterozygote type) | 42 | 42% | |
GG (homozygote, mutant type) | 18 | 18% | |
Sum | 100 | 100% |
The genetic diversity of rs2072671 in breast cancer patients
Table 7 shows the percentage and number of SNIP rs2072671 genotypes found in the patients with breast cancer on capecitabine. The most common genotype among the 100 breast cancer patients enrolled in this study was (AC) heterozygous, with 48 numbers of patients and 48% percentage, while the wild type was homozygous (AA), with frequent 30 and a percentage of 30%, and the mutant type (CC), which has a lower frequency and percentage, was 22% and frequently 22.
Table 7.
The Percentage and Frequency of Cytidine Deaminase Enzyme SNIP (rs2072671) Genotype in BreastCcancer Patients
SNIP | Genotype | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
rs2072671 | AA (Homozygote, wild type) | 30 | 30% |
AC (Heterozygote type) | 48 | 48% | |
CC (homozygote, mutant type) | 22 | 22% | |
Sum | 100 | 100% |
Table 1-2.
Primer Sequences Used for CDA rs532545 (451 A>G)
Primer | Sequence | Tm (°C) |
---|---|---|
(A) Forward (common) | F: GAA GGG CTG AGG CTG AAA | 73 |
(B) Reverse | R: TGG GCT AGG GCA AAG AGA | 65.36 |
(C) Reverse | CTG CAG CTT GTT CAT GCC TCC TGC CT | 70 |
Discussion
The most common form of cancer in women, breast cancer, has many causes, including genetics, family history, age, and lifestyle choices (Abbas et al., 2020; El Haidari et al., 2020). The demographic information of the patients who took part in this investigation is displayed in Table 2. Women in this study had a mean age of 55.136 years. Some women develop breast cancer at a younger age (below 40 years), but this only accounts for a small percentage of the overall incidence. However, because these cases are combined with more aggressive subtypes, it was anticipated that they would be diagnosed at a more advanced stage, which would result in a worse prognosis. This finding may be because early menarche will cause early progression of the breast and thus early exposure to estrogen, which results in an increase in the risk of developing breast cancer. On the other hand, older age at menarche will result in a lower risk of breast cancer in premenopausal females (Azamjah et al., 2019).
A number of studies have found a link between a woman’s marital status and her risk of developing breast cancer. Single women and women who had spent their entire lives without marriage had a significantly higher chance of developing breast cancer. On the other hand, a study that investigates the effect of marriage on the stage of cancer at diagnosis shows that single female cancer patients are more likely to develop the disease in more advanced stages than married cancer women (Yuan et al., 2021). Marriage can benefit female patients with gynecological cancer in several ways and improve their prognosis regarding disease progression (Li et al., 2020). The presence of a spouse or life partner in a woman’s life has a beneficial effect on lifestyle choices and health behaviors. In addition, marriage reduces risky behaviors and exerts social control over behaviors such as maintaining a healthy diet and exercise routine (Al-Kelabi et al., 2022; Brewer et al., 2017; Hadi et al., 2023; Nindrea et al., 2017).
Based on the findings of this study, breast cancer patients with a positive family history were more likely to develop this disease than those with a negative family history, which is consistent with the research. A positive family history practically doubles a woman’s chance of developing breast cancer in situ (Mukama et al., 2020).
Many studies have examined the correlation between rising serum estrogen levels and the onset of breast cancer (Russo and Russo, 2006). Most human breast cancers begin as estrogen-dependent, suggesting a role for estrogen signaling and the estrogen receptor (ER) in cancer growth. Hormone receptor-positive tumor cells have estrogen or progesterone receptors (Soewoto and Agustriani, 2023). Estrogens are thought to play a significant role in encouraging the proliferation of both normal and malignant breast epitheliums. Epidemiological studies have now proved what has been suspected for a long time: that they are breast carcinogens. Three main pathways are thought to be implicated in their carcinogenic effects: stimulation of cellular proliferation via their receptor-mediated hormone action, direct genotoxic effects via boosting mutation rates via a cytochrome P450-mediated metabolic activation, and production of aneuploidy (Stingl, 2011).
In this study estradiol level for patients who received capecitabine was (88.06 ± 15.33) in contrast to another study in Asian countries (Grau et al., 2008) which the mean ± St. Division was 61.51 ± 42.06. In our study, the estradiol level for SNIP rs2072671 for CC (homozygote, mutant type) mean and standard deviation was 41.01±10.78, whereas for AA (homozygote, wild type) it was 51.89±10.42, and for AC (heterozygote type) it was 53.98±10.96. There was no significant difference between them. The estradiol level for homozygote AA was the same as heterozygote AC. However, the mutation type of SNIP rs2072671 enzyme CDA, which is responsible for the conversion of capecitabine to 5-FU, lowers the estradiol level, which is in contrast with the study effect chemotherapy that lowers estradiol level (Grau et al., 2008).
Furthermore, the estradiol level for SNIP rs532545 for GG (homozygote, mutant type) mean and standard deviation was 37.98±3, whereas for AA (homozygote, wild type) it was 74.43±14.86, and for AG (heterozygote type) it was 33.08±3.72. For this SNIP, the estradiol level of homozygote was higher than heterozygote and mutant type. Serum levels of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) are monitored periodically in breast cancer patients throughout the course of treatment (Fejzić et al., 2015). CA15-3 may be useful in estimating the extent to which breast cancer has spread. An elevated level of CA15-3 would suggest the presence of metastases, particularly bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases may find it helpful to examine CA15-3 as a prognostic factor (Steinauer et al., 2014). However, no research has linked CA15-3, a tumor marker, to CDA enzyme genetic variation.
Higher mean and St. Division were found in this study for the SNP rs2072671 mutant type compared to homozygotes and heterozygotes. All genetic polymorphisms that reduce CDA’s ability to convert the prodrug capecitabine into the active drug 5-FU through acetylation in the liver reduce the medication’s activity and its effect on tumor markers. According to the findings of the Grau study (Grau et al., 2008), a genetic variation of the CDA enzyme has an effect on the activity of capecitabine and results in a poor prognosis for cancer.
Hypercalcemia is a common consequence of breast cancer and a major source of morbidity and mortality from the disease. Patients with multiple skeletal metastases are especially at risk. However, in a sizable subset of patients, elevated calcium levels develop even in the bones and joints illness (DeMauro and Wysolmerski, 2005). When serum calcium levels are over 10.5 mg/dl and albumin levels are under 4 g/dl, a condition known as hypercalcemia develops. When chemotherapy is given to patients with hypercalcemia due to breast or lung cancer, the calcium levels decrease, most likely due to a decrease in PTHrP levels (Hassan et al., 2012).
In the current study (Table 5) SNP rs2072671, homozygotes AA, heterozygotes AC, and mutant homozygotes CC were all given calcium levels that were within the normal range. Regarding SNP rs532545, the same scenario applies: all homozygotes are AA, heterozygotes are AG, and mutant homozygotes are GG, and all of them have calcium levels that are within the normal range. Which is to be expected the calcium level is kept within an extremely tight range, which is between 8.5 and 10.5 mg/dl (Saif, 2013).
Table 6 and Table 7 show the results of genotyping testing revealing the frequencies and percentages of CDA enzyme polymorphisms among the breast cancer patients of this study. Our results for SNP are consistent with what a study that indicated heterozygotes of type AC were more common than those of type AA or CC (mutant homozygotes), respectively. Xandra’s research reveals that 239 individuals in Spain were genotyped using SNP rs2072671. Of those patients, 106 have heterozygotes AC, 37 have mutant homozygotes CC, and 96 have homozygotes AA. In contrast to the findings of a prior study (García-González et al., 2015), the current study on SNP rs532545 demonstrates that heterozygotes AG are more prevalent than homozygotes AA and mutant heterozygotes GG. Cohen studies have shown that for SNP rs532545, 47% of patients contain homozygotes AA, 42% of patients contain heterozygotes AG, and 11% of patients contain mutant homozygotes. These findings were based on the analysis of 181 patients. In this study, we investigated the markers associated with cancer, it is suggested that the rate of tumor growth in relation to the CDA polymorphism in patients receiving capecitabine is investigated in the next studies.
In conclusion, our results indicated the presence of a highly polymorphic cytosine deaminase (CDA) enzyme in breast cancer patients. The CDA enzyme was found to have different genotypes and variable frequencies in these women. Homozygotes and mutant homozygotes were less common compared to heterozygotes for two specific genetic variations of rs532545 and rs2072671. The levels of estradiol hormone and cancer antigen CA15.3 were found to be variable and correlated with the highly polymorphic CDA enzyme. This implies that the genetic variations in the CDA enzyme may be influencing the levels of these parameters, potentially affecting the progression or treatment response of breast cancer in these women. Overall, the findings suggest that the genetic polymorphism of the CDA enzyme may play a role in breast cancer prognosis and treatment response in breast cancer patients. Further research is warranted to better understand the implications of these genetic variations on the levels of hormone and antigen markers and to explore potential therapeutic strategies targeting the CDA enzyme.
Author Contribution Statement
Ali Amal Aldeen Majeed: Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Original draft preparation; Karar Kadhim Mohsin: Methodology, Data curation, Original draft preparation; Hasanian Shakir Mahmood: Reviewing and Editing Raaid Fadhl Abbas: Writing- Reviewing and Editing; Ahmed Salih Sahib: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing- Reviewing and Editing.
Acknowledgements
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Ethical Approval
The study’s protocol was approved by the Pharmacy College’s Scientific and Ethical Committee at Karbala University
Funding
The authors declare that no funds were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
References
- Abbas YJ, Al-Tu’ma FJ, Al-Hemerri AF. Association between Matrix Metalloproteinas-2 Gene Variants and Pathogenesis of Breast Cancer in Sera of Iraqi Women. Contemp Med Sci. 2020;6:285–90. [Google Scholar]
- Abed SN, Mahdi HS, Sahib AS, et al. Serum levels of cancer antigen 15 3 and estrogen in a samples of iraqi women with breast cancer treated with anastrazole. Int J Pharm Res. 2020;12:1604–8. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Kelabi HM, Al-Tu’ma FJ, Al-Hasnawy TSM, Al-Tu’ma AF, Hussein AF. Association between 25 (OH) D3 and Estrogens in Iraqi Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women with Type 2 Diabetes. HIV Nurs. 2022;22:638–43. [Google Scholar]
- Azamjah N, Soltan-Zadeh Y, Zayeri F. Global trend of breast cancer mortality rate: a 25-year study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:2015. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brewer HR, Jones ME, Schoemaker MJ, Ashworth A, Swerdlow AJ. Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165:193–200. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4325-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cambi A, Vincenzetti S, Neuhard J, et al. Identification of four amino acid residues essential for catalysis in human cytidine deaminase by site-directed mutagenesis and chemical modifications. Protein Eng. 1998;11:59–63. doi: 10.1093/protein/11.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carpi FM, Vincenzetti S, Ubaldi J, et al. CDA gene polymorphisms and enzyme activity: genotype–phenotype relationship in an Italian–Caucasian population. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14:769–81. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakravarty D, Nair SS, Santhamma B, et al. Extranuclear functions of ER impact invasive migration and metastasis by breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4092–101. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De With M, van Doorn L, Maasland DC, et al. Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A pharmacogenetic study beyond DPYD. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;159:114232. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeMauro S, Wysolmerski J. Hypercalcemia in breast cancer: an echo of bone mobilization during lactation? J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2005;10:157–67. doi: 10.1007/s10911-005-5398-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duffy MJ, Evoy D, McDermott EW. CA 15-3: uses and limitation as a biomarker for breast cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:1869–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Haidari R, Abbas LA, Nerich V, Anota A. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer in the Middle East: a systematic review. Cancers. 2020;12:696. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erdogan B, Cicin I. Medical treatment of breast cancer bone metastasis: from bisphosphonates to targeted drugs. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:1503–10. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fejzić H, Mujagić S, Azabagić S, Burina M. Tumor marker CA 15-3 in breast cancer patients. Acta Med Acad. 2015:44. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García-González X, Cortejoso L, García MI, et al. Variants in CDA and ABCB1 are predictors of capecitabine-related adverse reactions in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:6422. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grau JJ, Caballero M, Monzó M, et al. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenases and cytidine‐deaminase gene polymorphisms as outcome predictors in resected gastric cancer patients treated with fluoropyrimidine adjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:130–4. doi: 10.1002/jso.21096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hadi ZA, Al-Tu’ma FJ, Odda AH, Almuhafdah H. Serum Antioxidant Status in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: Implications for Oxidative Stress and Disease Severity. J Contemp Med Sci. 2023:9. [Google Scholar]
- Hadisuwarno W, Savitri M, Ashariati A, et al. A 40-year-old Woman with Hypercalcemia Crisis Caused by Bone Metastasis in Stage IV Breast Cancer. Biomol Heal Sci J. 2021;4:117. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan BAR, Yusoff ZBM, Hassali MA, Othman SB, Weiderpass E. Impact of chemotherapy on hypercalcemia in breast and lung cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:4373–8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Innocenti F, Mills SC, Sanoff H, et al. All you need to know about DPYD genetic testing for patients treated with fluorouracil and capecitabine: A practitioner-friendly guide. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16:793–8. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaklamani VG, Gradishar WJ. Role of capecitabine (Xeloda®) in breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2003;3:137–44. doi: 10.1586/14737140.3.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M, Han M, Chen Z, et al. Does marital status correlate with the female breast cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0229899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Łukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, et al. Breast cancer—epidemiology, risk factors, classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment strategies—an updated review. Cancers. 2021;13:4287. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mukama T, Kharazmi E, Sundquist K, et al. Familial risk of breast cancer by dynamic, accumulative, and static definitions of family history. Cancer. 2020;126:2837–48. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nindrea RD, Aryandono T, Lazuardi L. Breast cancer risk from modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors among women in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:3201. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reigner B, Watanabe T, Schüller J, et al. Pharmacokinetics of capecitabine (Xeloda) in Japanese and Caucasian patients with breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2003;52:193–201. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0642-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberto M, Romiti A, Botticelli A, et al. Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil degradation rate and Pharmacogenetic profiling to predict toxicity following adjuvant Capecitabine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73:157–64. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2160-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russo J, Russo IH. The role of estrogen in the initiation of breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;102:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saha Roy S, Vadlamudi RK. Role of estrogen receptor signaling in breast cancer metastasis. Int J Breast Cancer. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/654698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saif MW. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) polymorphism among Caucasian and non-Caucasian patients with 5-FU-and capecitabine-related toxicity using full sequencing of DPYD. Cancer Genom Proteom. 2013;10:89–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schellens JH. Capecitabine. Oncologist. 2007;12:152–5. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-2-152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serdjebi C, Milano G, Ciccolini J. Role of cytidine deaminase in toxicity and efficacy of nucleosidic analogs. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11:665–72. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.985648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shankar A, Roy S, Rath GK, et al. Aromatase inhibition and capecitabine combination as 1 st or 2 nd line treatment for metastatic breast cancer-a retrospective analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:6359–64. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soewoto W, Agustriani N. Estradiol Levels and Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Clinical Study. World J Oncol. 2023;14:60. doi: 10.14740/wjon1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinauer K, Huang DJ, Eppenberger-Castori S, Amann E, Güth U. Bone metastases in breast cancer: Frequency, metastatic pattern and non-systemic locoregional therapy. J Bone Oncol. 2014;3:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stingl J. Estrogen and progesterone in normal mammary gland development and in cancer. Horm Cancer. 2011;2:85–90. doi: 10.1007/s12672-010-0055-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varma A, Jayanthi M, Dubashi B, Shewade D. Influence of DPYD* 9A, DPYD* 6 and GSTP1 ile105val genetic polymorphisms on capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) associated toxicities in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:3093. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.10.3093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol. 2022;95:20211033. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan R, Zhang C, Li Q, Ji M, He N. The impact of marital status on stage at diagnosis and survival of female patients with breast and gynecologic cancers: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162:778–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data and materials that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.