Skip to main content
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP logoLink to Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
. 2023;24(12):4111–4115. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.12.4111

Community-based Screening of Oral Cancer in Selected Districts of Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study

Gambhir Shrestha 1,*, Dej Kumar Gautam 2, Bhola Siwakoti 3, Kishore Kumar Pradhananga 4, Rashmi Mulmi 3
PMCID: PMC10909109  PMID: 38156845

Abstract

Objective:

Oral cancer screening plays a vital role in the prevention and control of oral cancer. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) in the Nepalese community.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted in six purposively selected districts in Nepal from May to December 2019. It utilized a camp-based approach, where a standardized questionnaire was administered through face-to-face interviews. Screening of oral cancer was performed by direct visualization and palpation. The study included adults aged 18 years and above, while those already diagnosed with oral cancer were excluded. Logistic regression was used to find out the association between OPMDs and the related variables.

Results:

A total of 1930 participants with a mean age of 44.3 years (SD=15.1) underwent oral cancer screening. Among them, 32% were current tobacco users, 2% were ex-users, and 11% were alcohol consumers. OPMDs, including suspected cancer, were identified in 139 (7.2%, 95% CI=6.1-8.4) participants. The most common lesion detected was leukoplakia (4.2%), followed by submucous fibrosis (1.5%), erythroplakia (0.9%), and palatal changes due to reverse smoking (0.1%). Additionally, 10 participants were suspected of having oral cancer. Older age group (AOR=7.00; 95% CI=2.76-17.77), male gender (AOR=2.52; 95% CI=1.58-4.02), tobacco chewers (AOR = 14.30; 95% CI=8.82-23.19), and smokers (AOR=4.67; 95% CI=2.88-7.57)) were identified as predictors of OPMDs.

Conclusion:

This study revealed a high prevalence of OPMDs in Nepal, highlighting the need for oral cancer screening. The findings emphasize the importance of developing strategies to reduce tobacco use and implementing tobacco cessation intervention programs in Nepal to alleviate the burden of oral cancer.

Key Words: Oral cancer, precancerous, early detection, Nepal

Introduction

Oral cancer ranks as the 16th most common cancer in the world in 2020, with Asian countries contributing two-thirds of all cases (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2020a). In the same year, oral cancer accounted for 844 new cases (ranking sixth) and 446 deaths (ranking seventh) in Nepal (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2020b). The oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) such as oral leukoplakia, oral submucous fibrosis, and oral erythroplakia, take years to progress into oral cancer. Effective detection of these OPMDs through visual inspection or palpation by healthcare professionals can prevent the development of oral cancer (Bouvard et al., 2022; Petersen, 2009; Sankaranarayanan et al., 2015). Various studies have demonstrated the efficacy of visual inspection of the oral cavity in reducing mortality from oral cancer, (Fedele, 2009; Sankaranarayanan et al., 2015) with a sensitivity of 50 to 99% and specificity of 75 to 99% (Walsh et al., 2021).

Screening plays a crucial role in the early detection of OPMDs. While screening services are primarily available at hospitals, there is a scarcity of screening services at the community level. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence of OPMDs through visual inspection in selected districts of Nepal.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2019 to December 2019 in six purposively selected districts of Nepal viz. Chitwan, Makwanpur, Kapilvastu, Jhapa, Dhanusha and Kaski (Figure 1). Two oral cancer camps were organized in two different municipalities of the selected districts, led by B.P Koirala Memorial Hospital (BPKMCH), Chitwan, in close coordination with the District Public Health Office and the local municipality.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of Nepal Illustrating the Districts Selected in the Oral Cancer Screening Camps Conducted During the Study

Data was collected using a standardized questionnaire via face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic characteristics, family history of cancer, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, oral cavity-related complaints, and oral cancer screening form. Trained medical professionals with at least two years of experience conducted the visual inspection and palpation of the oral cavity. The study included adults aged 18 years and above, excluding those who had already been diagnosed with oral cancer. However, every participant in the camp received counseling, and screening, regardless of the study criteria. Pretesting of the questionnaire was carried out on 10% of the sample size among visitors at BPKMCH, who were not included in this study.

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2007 and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 17. The dependent variable was the presence of OPMDs, and the independent variables were sociodemographic characteristics, family history of cancer, current oral problems, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data in the form of frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Unconditional logistic regression was applied to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), to determine the strength of the association between dependent and independent variables.

This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee, Nepal Health Research Council (Reg. no. 151/2019). Participants were provided with a clear explanation of the study objectives and procedure, and informed consent was obtained before their inclusion.

Results

A total of 1930 participants, with a mean age of 44.3 years (SD=15.1), were included in this study. The majority of the participants fell in the 31-45 years age group (35.2%), followed by the 45-60 years. Females were more than males (61.2% vs. 38.8%). The majority of participants were farmers (32.8%), followed by homemakers (28.4%). Only 0.4% of the participants had a history of cancer unrelated to head and neck cancer, while 2.7% reported a history of cancer in the family. Among the participants, 32.2% were current tobacco users, and 1.9% were ex-users. Of the current tobacco users, 65.0% were tobacco chewers, 26.0% were smokers and the rest used both forms. Approximately 10.6% were alcohol consumers (Table 1). The common presenting complaints were sore throat (15.0%), followed by denture or gum problems (12.4%), and earache (4.3%). Only 2.5% of the participants reported red or white patches in the mouth (Table 2).

Table 1.

Demographic and Personal History of Participants Screened for Oral Cancer in Selected Districts of Nepal (n=1930).

Variables Categories n %
Age (in years) 18-30 412 21.3
31-45 680 35.2
45-60 530 27.5
>60 308 16.0
Gender Male 749 38.8
Female 1181 61.2
Occupation Farmer 632 32.8
Homemaker 548 28.4
Business 238 12.3
Skilled/Service 238 12.3
Student 141 7.8
Retired 38 2.1
Labour 31 1.6
Semiskilled 30 1.5
Unemployed 24 1.2
Past history of cancer Yes 8 0.4
No 1922 99.6
Family history of Cancer Yes 53 2.7
No 1877 97.3
Tobacco use None 1271 65.9
Current user 622 32.2
Ex-user 37 1.9
Type of tobacco among current users (n=622) Tobacco chewing 404 65.0
Smoking 162 26.0
Both 56 9.0
Alcohol consumption Yes 205 10.6
No 1725 89.4

Table 2.

Presenting Complaints of Participants Screened for Oral Cancer in Selected Districts of Nepal (n=1930)

Oral cavity complaints* n %
Sore throat 289 15.0
Denture or gum problems 240 12.4
Earache 83 4.3
Difficulty in swallowing 53 2.8
Change in voice 51 2.6
Red or white patched in mouth 48 2.5
Sore in mouth 45 2.3
Bleeding from oral cavity 21 1.1
Swelling in head and neck 19 1.0
Lump in throat 15 0.8
Growth in neck 14 0.7

*includes multiple complaints

OPMDs, including suspected cancerous lesions, were detected in a total of 139 participants (7.2%, 95% CI=6.1-8.4). The most common lesion observed was leukoplakia (4.2%), followed by submucous fibrosis (1.5%), erythroplakia (0.9%), and palatal changes due to reverse smoking (0.1%). Additionally, 10 participants were suspected of having oral cancer (Table 3). The majority of OPMDs were located on the buccal mucosa (73.4%), followed by the gum (22.3%), gingival buccal sulcus (20.1%), and tongue (10.8%) (Table 4).

Table 3.

Type of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders Detected among the Participants Screened for Oral Cancer in the Selected Districts of Nepal (n=1930)

Type of oral potentially malignant disorders n %
Leukoplakia 82 4.2
Submucous fibrosis 28 1.5
Erythroplakia 18 0.9
Suspected cancer 10 0.5
Palatal changes due to reverse smoking 1 0.1
Total OPMDs detected 139 7.2

Table 4.

Sites of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders Detected among the Participants Screened for Oral Cancer in the Selected Districts of Nepal (n=139)

Sites* n %
Buccal mucosa 102 73.4
Gum 31 22.3
Gingival buccal sulcus 28 20.1
Tongue 15 10.8
Lip 9 6.5
Labial mucosa 8 5.6
Hard palate 7 5.0
Floor of mouth 6 4.3
Retromolar triangle 3 2.2
Soft palate 3 2.2

*multiple sites

The prevalence of OPMDs was found to increase with age. Compared to the younger age group of 16-30 years, participants aged 31-45 years had four times higher odds of having OPMDs (AOR=3.88; 95% CI=1.56-9.67), while those in the 45-60 years and over 60 years age groups had seven times higher odds (AOR=7.06; 95% CI= 2.86-17.46 and AOR=7.00; 95% CI=2.76-17.77). Males were more likely to have OPMDs than females (AOR=2.52; 95% CI=1.58-4.02). The odds of having OPMDs among the tobacco chewers were 14 times higher compared to the non-users (AOR = 14.30; 95% CI=8.82-23.19), while smokers had seven times higher odds compared to non-smokers (AOR=4.67; 95% CI=2.88-7.57). The association between alcohol use and OPMDs, which was significant in bivariate analysis (COR=4.88, 95% CI=3.30-7.21), did not remain statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. A family history of cancer was not found to be significant in this study (Table 5).

Table 5.

Association of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders with Demographic and Personal History

Variables Category OPMDs COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI)
Present n (%) Absent n (%)
Age (in years) 16-30 6 (1.5) 406 (98.5) Ref Ref
31-45 42 (6.2) 638 (93.8) 4.46 (1.89-10.57) 3.88 (1.56-9.67)
45-60 54 (10.2) 476 (89.8) 7.68 (3.27-18.03) 7.06 (2.86-17.46)
>60 37 (12.0) 271 (88.0) 9.24 (3.85-22.19) 7.00 (2.76-17.77)
Gender Female 32 (2.7) 1149 (97.3) Ref Ref
Male 107 (14.3) 642 (85.7) 5.98 (3.99-8.99) 2.52 (1.58-4.02)
Family history of cancer No 134 (7.1) 1743 (92.9) Ref Ref
Yes 5 (9.4) 48 (90.6) 1.36 (0.53-3.46) 1.11 (0.39-3.19)
Tobacco chewing No 29 (2.0) 1441 (98.0) Ref Ref
Yes 110 (23.9) 350 (76.1) 15.62 (10.21-23.90) 14.30 (8.82-23.19)
Smoking No 94 (5.5) 1618 (94.5) Ref Ref
Yes 45 (20.6) 173 (79.4) 4.48 (3.04-6.60) 4.67 (2.88-7.57)
Alcohol use No 94 (5.4) 1631 (94.6) Ref Ref
Yes 45 (22.0) 160 (78.0) 4.88 (3.30-7.21) 1.08 (0.68-1.72)

COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of OPMDs and associated factors among adults in Nepal. This study revealed an overall prevalence rate of 7.2% for OPMDs in the study population. Higher prevalence rates have been reported in a study conducted in Eastern Nepal and other studies conducted in India (Kumar et al., 2015; Kumbhalwar et al., 2022; Rimal et al., 2019). Conversely, lower prevalence rates have also been reported in other studies (Pahwa et al., 2018; Vinay et al., 2014). Among the identified OPMDs, leukoplakia was the most observed, followed by submucous fibrosis. Similar patterns were reported by other studies (Kumbhalwar et al., 2022; Mustafa et al., 2021). In contrast, other studies have reported a higher prevalence of oral submucous fibrosis (Kumbhalwar et al., 2022; Srivastava et al., 2020). The variation in prevalence and lesion patterns across different geographical regions may be attributed to cultural differences, location of data collection, dietary habits, environmental factors, and variations in tobacco and alcohol consumption in terms of frequency, duration, and type.

Sore throat and denture/gum problems were the most commonly reported presenting problems among participants, which may be attributed to the camp-based approach utilized in this study. Notably, 2.5% of the participants reported the presence of a white or red patch in their oral cavity, indicating a need to promote health-seeking behavior and encourage self-mouth examination as a cost-effective approach to reducing the burden of oral cancer.

Similar to other studies, a higher prevalence of OPMDs was observed among males compared to females (Kumbhalwar et al., 2022; Pahwa et al., 2018; Rimal et al., 2019; Vinay et al., 2014). This male predominance can be attributed to the higher prevalence of tobacco and alcohol consumption among males. In the largest cancer hospital in Nepal, the incidence of oral cancer is more in males than females (Shrestha et al., 2021).

Both tobacco chewing and smoking were identified as significant predictors of OPMDs. Numerous studies have reported a strong association between tobacco use in any form and OPMDs (Kumbhalwar et al., 2022; Pahwa et al., 2018; Srivastava et al., 2020). While alcohol consumption showed a significant association with OPMDs in bivariate analysis, this difference did not remain statistically significant after adjustment. This finding was consistent with a study in India (Pahwa et al., 2018).

Oral cancer screening through visual inspection is a simple procedure that is easily performed by trained primary health care workers. It is crucial to raise awareness about oral cancer and its risk factors. Implementing mass screening programs for oral cancer can address the screening needs of the population, especially in rural areas. Additionally, this study emphasizes the urgent need for strategies to reduce tobacco consumption and implement tobacco cessation programs. However, it should be noted that the findings of this study are not generalizable due to the purposive selection of districts and the study population. Confirmation of the diagnosis of OPMDs and cancerous lesions was not undertaken, although patients were advised to follow up in BPKMCH.

In conclusion, the present study highlights a high prevalence of OPMDs in Nepal, emphasizing the urgent need for screening and early detection of oral cancers in the community. Efforts should be directed toward developing strategies to reduce tobacco use and implementing tobacco cessation intervention programs in Nepal.

Author Contribution Statement

GS, BS & RM conceived the study. GS, BS & RM contributed to the design of the study. Data collection was done by GS, DKG, BS & KKP. Data analysis was done by GS & RM. Preliminary report writing was performed by GS, DKG, BS & RM. Manuscript editing and review was done by GS & RM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Department of Cancer Prevention, Control and Research, BPKMCH, the District Public Health Offices, and the local municipalities for their valuable support in conducting the screening camp for this study.

We would also like to thank all the participants in the study. This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee, Nepal Health Research Council (Reg. no. 151/2019). The dataset used in this study is available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. We did not receive any funds for this study.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Bouvard V, Nethan ST, Singh D, et al. IARC perspective on oral cancer prevention. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:1999–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2210097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fedele S. Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer. Head Neck Oncol. 2009:1. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lip, oral cavity. 2020a. [(accessed Jan 2023)]. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/1-Lip-oral-cavity-fact-sheet.pdf .
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan Nepal factsheet. 2020b. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/524-nepal-fact-sheets.pdf .
  5. Kumar S, Debnath N, Ismail MB, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for oral potentially malignant disorders in Indian population. Adv Pre Med. 2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/208519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumbhalwar A, Shetiya SH, Kakodkar P, et al. Prevalence of precancerous lesions and conditions in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Methodol. 2022;12:293–304. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mustafa E, Parmar S, Praveen P. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for the Clinician. Singapore: Springer; 2021. Premalignant lesions and conditions of the oral cavity; pp. 1845– 52. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pahwa V, Nair S, Shetty RS, et al. Prevalence of oral premalignant lesions and its risk factors among the adult population in Udupi Taluk of coastal Karnataka, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:2165–70. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.8.2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Petersen PE. Oral cancer prevention and control--the approach of the World Health Organization. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:454–60. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rimal J, Shrestha A, Maharjan IK, et al. Risk assessment of smokeless tobacco among oral precancer and cancer patients in eastern developmental region of Nepal. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20:411–5. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Amarasinghe H, et al. Oral cancer: prevention, early detection, and treatment, In ‘Disease Control Priorities. Washington (DC): The World Bank; 2015. p. 85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shrestha G, Siwakoti B, Mulmi R, et al. Trend of head and neck cancers in a national tertiary cancer hospital of Nepal from 2012 to 2017. South Asian J Cancer. 2021;10:236–40. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Srivastava R, Sharma L, Pradhan D, et al. Prevalence of oral premalignant lesions and conditions among the population of Kanpur City, India: A cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9:1080–5. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_912_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vinay BH, Baghirath PV, Kumar JV, et al. Prevalence of precancerous lesions and conditions in Telangana region, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2014;12:23–7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Walsh T, Warnakulasuriya S, Lingen MW, et al. Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12:CD010173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010173.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP are provided here courtesy of West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention

RESOURCES