Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2023 Feb 28;45(12):e12975. doi: 10.1111/pim.12975

Modulation of haematopoiesis by protozoal and helminth parasites

Kyle T Cunningham 1, Kingston H G Mills 2,
PMCID: PMC10909493  PMID: 36797216

Abstract

During inflammation, haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow (BM) and periphery rapidly expand and preferentially differentiate into myeloid cells that mediate innate immune responses. HSCs can be directed into quiescence or differentiation by sensing alterations to the haematopoietic niche, including cytokines, chemokines, and pathogen‐derived products. Most studies attempting to identify the mechanisms of haematopoiesis have focused on bacterial and viral infections. From intracellular protozoan infections to large multicellular worms, parasites are a global health burden and represent major immunological challenges that remain poorly defined in the context of haematopoiesis. Immune responses to parasites vary drastically, and parasites have developed sophisticated immunomodulatory mechanisms that allow development of chronic infections. Recent advances in imaging, genomic sequencing, and mouse models have shed new light on how parasites induce unique forms of emergency haematopoiesis. In addition, parasites can modify the haematopoiesis in the BM and periphery to improve their survival in the host. Parasites can also induce long‐lasting modifications to HSCs, altering future immune responses to infection, inflammation or transplantation, a term sometimes referred to as central trained immunity. In this review, we highlight the current understanding of parasite‐induced haematopoiesis and how parasites target this process to promote chronic infections.

Keywords: haematopoiesis, immune modulation, immunological terms, innate immunity, parasite

1. INTRODUCTION TO HOMEOSTATIC AND INFECTION‐INDUCED HAEMATOPOIESIS

Under homeostatic conditions, there is a constant renewal of red and white blood cells. Hundreds of billions of new cells are produced each day in the bone marrow (BM) of humans. 1 This process, known as haematopoiesis, is essential for steady‐state function and maintenance. During inflammation, local cells that recognize pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and damage‐associate molecular patterns (DAMPs) become activated and either send signals or traffic to the BM to initiate emergency haematopoiesis. This allows for the rapid and efficient production of new immune cells which traffic to the site of inflammation. Haematopoiesis is essential for the robust induction of immune responses. Because of their short half‐life, innate immune cells require constant renewal. For example, monocytes, which patrol the periphery and differentiate into effector macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs), have a steady state half‐life of approximately 2 days. 2 Homeostatic and emergency haematopoiesis are dependent on numerous factors, including cell–cell interactions in the haematopoietic niche, cytokines, metabolic changes, and BM‐invading pathogens. 3 , 4

Haematopoiesis primarily occurs in the BM, where haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) differentiate from oligo‐ and multi‐potent progenitor cells into mature effector cells. Notably, this process has also been shown to occur in other organs, including the spleen, gastrointestinal tract, liver and the brain. Haematopoiesis in the BM occurs in a highly specialized compartment. The haematopoietic niche is tightly controlled by a collection of immune cells, stromal cells, mesenchymal stem cells, neuronal synapses, and a small number of blood vessels. This niche provides a buffer for the HSCs from the environment, inhibiting the induction of aberrant haematopoiesis during steady state, while promoting controlled emergency haematopoiesis in response to inflammation. 5

Differentiation of HSCs follows a loose hierarchical structure, with long‐lived oligopotent HSCs becoming multipotent progenitors, followed by lineage‐committed progenitor cells, and finally mature immune cells. In mammals, the long‐term HSC (LT‐HSC) resides at the top of this haematopoiesis hierarchy (Table 1). LT‐HSC are primarily quiescent, long‐lived cells defined by their ability to self‐renew and differentiate into every cell of the haematopoietic cell system. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 To respond to the haematopoietic needs of the body, LT‐HSCs express multiple receptors, including receptors for interleukin (IL)‐1, IL‐6, tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interferons (IFNs), and colony‐stimulating factors (CSFs). 9 , 10 Upon activation, LT‐HSCs differentiate into short‐term (ST)‐HSCs and multipotent progenitors (MPPs). During steady state and emergency haematopoiesis, MPPs are responsible for the majority of haematopoiesis. 9 , 11 However, both LT‐ and ST‐HSCs have been shown to promote haematopoiesis in homeostatic conditions, highlighting the complexity of this process. 12 , 13 , 14

TABLE 1.

HSC subpopulations and lineage potential.

Cell population Surface markers Lineage potential
LT‐HSC

Lin CD45+ cKit+ Sca1+

CD135 CD48 CD150+

Oligopotent
ST‐HSC

Lin CD45+cKit+ Sca1+

CD135 CD48+ CD150+

Oligopotent
MPP

Lin CD45+ cKit+ Sca1+

CD135 CD48+ CD150

Oligopotent
MPP3

Lin CD45+ cKit+ Sca1+

CD135 CD48+ CD150 CD34+ CD135

Oligopotent, myeloid bias
MPP4

Lin CD45+ cKit+ Sca1+

CD135 CD48+ CD150 CD34+ CD135+

Oligopotent, lymphoid bias

Note: Lineage negative (Lin): CD11bCD3CD19Ly6GSiglec‐FTer119.

Abbreviations: HSCs, haematopoietic stem cells; LT, long‐term; MPP, multipotent progenitor; ST, short‐term.

Although initially described as a homogenous collection of multipotent cells, single‐cell transcriptomic, and epigenomic sequencing has revealed that MPPs are a heterogenous population of four small subtypes (MPP1‐4). 15 , 16 Each of these MPP subtypes can differentiate into every haematopoietic cell, however, each MPP subset has a defined transcriptional bias towards a preferred lineage. For example, MPP4, also known as lymphoid MPPs, display a higher probability of differentiating into lymphoid lineage cells, whereas MPP2 and MPP3 are significantly more likely to develop into myeloid cells. 11 This transcriptional bias is shown in the expression of various lineage‐specific gene transcripts, however, there is significant overlap in expression between subtypes. After activation with various inflammatory factors, MPPs further differentiate into the lineage‐committed progenitors, the common myeloid progenitor (CMP), and the common lymphoid progenitor (CLP). In turn, these lineage‐committed progenitors differentiate into increasingly cell‐specific precursors, before finally developing into mature immune cells.

Despite their sequestration in the BM niche, HSCs and progenitor cells express receptors for cytokines, growth factors, neurotransmitters, and chemokines. Interestingly, these oligopotent progenitors also express pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and can respond to PAMPs, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding to toll‐like receptor (TLR) 4. 17 TLR agonists have been shown to directly activate HSCs and induce their proliferation and differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Zhang et al. demonstrated that a single intraperitoneal injection of mice with flagellin, a TLR5 and NLR4 agonist, induced proliferation of HSCs. 18 HSCs from flagellin‐injected mice showed improved engraftment when transferred to irradiated mice, with a preference for myelopoiesis.

During infection, these signals coalesce to induce adaptive responses in the BM niche that direct appropriate differentiation of mature immune cells. For example, infection with the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes induces signals in the HSC niche that induce the proliferation and expansion of monocytes. 19 In addition, recent research into emergency haematopoiesis has found that IFNs play a key role in activating and modulating HSCs in the control of bacterial infections. For example, in mice infected with Mycobacterium avium, HSCs respond to IFN‐γ signalling to proliferate and increase myelopoiesis. 20 In contrast, type I IFNs have a negative influence on myelopoiesis, whereas type II IFNs provide protection in mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. IFN can include long‐lasting modifications to HSCs, with altered phenotypes persisting for up to 1‐year. 21

Parasites infect hundreds of millions of people and are a major health burden across the world. Parasites represent a diverse group, ranging from unicellular protozoan parasites, such as the Plasmodium species responsible for malaria, to multi‐cellular parasitic worms, also known as helminths, such as Fasciola hepatica or liver fluke. In general, infection with intracellular parasites induces type 1 immune responses, whereas helminths induce type 2 immune responses. However, parasites, especially helminths also actively modulate these immune responses. The induction and modulation of peripheral immune responses by parasites have been extensively studied and reviewed in the context of both protozoan and helminth parasites. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Parasite infections are typically chronic and can alter the host in a myriad of ways. During acute infections with bacterial and viral agents, HSCs respond via transient activation and differentiation, followed by a return to quiescence. However, chronic infections with parasites, and the corresponding long‐lasting cytokine stimulation can lead to HSC exhaustion and dysfunction. Haematopoiesis in response to acute and chronic bacterial, viral, and fungal infections has been well characterized and documented. 27 , 28 , 29 There is more limited knowledge on the influence of parasitic infections on haematopoiesis. In this review, we highlight the emerging evidence of a role for haematopoiesis in expanding anti‐parasite immune responses, and how parasites have evolved to promote dysfunctional haematopoiesis to promote their survival in the host.

2. PROTOZOAN PARASITE INFECTION AND HAEMATOPOIESIS

Protozoa are a large family of unicellular organisms, which includes Plasmodium, Leishmania, Toxoplasma, and Trypanosoma species. Protozoan infections are typically spread through the faecal‐oral route or by arthropod vectors, such as sand flies or mosquitos. There are different treatment approaches for different species, however, persistent, or recurrent infections are common. A robust immune response is essential for survival after infection with a protozoan parasite, which is often lethal in the immunocompromised individuals. Early responding immune cells, in particular neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages, migrate to the site of infection and mediate characteristic type 1 immune responses. This includes classical activation of macrophages, and production of pro‐inflammatory mediators, such as IFN‐γ, IL‐1β, IL‐12, and nitric oxide. 23 , 30 To maintain effective immune responses, innate immune cells, both tissue‐resident and infiltrating, require constant renewal from HSCs. This can occur centrally in the BM, or in the periphery at the site of inflammation, otherwise known as in situ haematopoiesis. For example, Osorio et al. show that Leishmania infection enhances local proliferation of infiltrating monocytes in the spleens of infected hamsters. 31 However, much like viral and bacterial pathogens, protozoan species have adapted to manipulate this emergency haematopoiesis to benefit their own survival. Locally proliferating monocytes, which contribute to the characteristic splenomegaly of leishmaniasis, were found to be preferred targets for infiltrating parasites. Targeting the in situ haematopoiesis with STAT3 inhibitors decreased monocyte proliferation and parasite burden. 31

2.1. Leishmania

In contrast to large parasitic worms, single‐celled parasites are uniquely capable of directly altering haematopoiesis in the BM. Indeed, many protozoan parasites, including Leishmania species can invade the BM or act on peripheral HSCs. Leishmania parasites are spread via sandflies and are found throughout the world, the two dominant species being Leishmania donovani and L. chagasi. 32 Once inside the mammalian hosts, the Leishmania parasites primarily reside in monocyte‐derived macrophages and DCs in the liver and spleen. However, it has also been widely reported that Leishmania can be found in the BM of infected individuals. 32 Indeed, a study of Brazilian patients suffering from visceral leishmaniasis, found that an increased number of amastigotes in the BM correlated with increased parasite load in the periphery. 33 Furthermore, patients who died from the infection had high parasite burdens in the BM. Leishmania activate the HSC compartment in the BM to promote the expansion of select immune cells. For example, infection of mice with L. donovani induces IFN‐γ‐secreting CD4+ T cells in the BM, which direct development and activation of monocytes. 34

BM‐resident macrophages can act as a reservoir of Leishmania parasites. During infection with L. donovani BM‐resident macrophages are susceptible to infection and promote the expansion of HSC and myelopoiesis through secretion of granulocyte‐macrophage CSF (GM‐CSF) and TNF. 35 , 36 L. donovani has also been shown to specifically direct HSCs to differentiate into monocytes that are more permissible to infection. 37 Monocytes found in the BM of infected mice had a regulatory phenotype and a reduced capacity to differentiate into macrophages capable of initiating pro‐inflammatory anti‐leishmania responses. Moreover, this was mediated by cytokines, such as IL‐1β and IFN‐γ, and various growth factors in the BM. In support of these findings, it was demonstrated that BM extracellular fluid from infected mice directly expanded HSCs and generated suppressive monocytes seen during experimental infections. 37 In a separate study, HSCs from L. donovani‐infected mice were found to have defective self‐renewal and engraftment abilities. This coincided with increased proliferation of LT‐HSCs, mediated by TNF‐induced expansion and maintenance of IFN‐γ‐secreting BM‐resident CD4+ T cells. 38 Mice lacking T and B cells showed no changes to their HSC populations following infection with L. donovani, despite displaying an increase in parasite burden. Modulation of HSCs appears to occur across multiple Leishmania species, as experimental cutaneous infection of mice with L. major induces the expansion of LT‐HSC in BM, and myeloid‐biased MPP2/3 in the BM and spleen. 39

Despite the evidence that mature immune cells and stromal cells are the predominant hosts for Leishmania in the BM, it has recently been reported that HSC harboured the parasites in Syrian hamsters infected with L. donovani. 36 , 40 , 41 Using bioluminescent live imaging, Leishmania were found in the BM during infection, as well as post‐treatment with anti‐leishmanial drugs. After treatment, Leishmania in the BM were found to repopulate the spleen and liver, therefore identifying the BM as an essential niche for parasite persistence. Crucially, while Leishmania have previously been shown to reside in BM‐resident mature immune cells, this study demonstrated that long‐lived LT‐HSC also provides a key sanctuary for the parasite during leishmania infection.

2.2. Plasmodium

In humans, malaria is primarily caused by Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax. 42 Like Leishmania, Plasmodium species have been shown to reside in the BM. 43 , 44 , 45 Interestingly, a recent study of patients found that total parasite biomass in the BM, rather than in the blood, correlated strongly with poor prognosis. 46 Histological and genetic screening of samples collected from children who died from P. falciparum in Malawi found that the BM contained a large reservoir of parasites. 47 Further histological analyses revealed that the parasites were located primarily extravascularly, with many residing in BM macrophages, and some found directly adjacent to erythroid progenitors.

A number of studies have attempted to decipher the mechanisms of Plasmodium‐induced alterations to haematopoiesis. Belyaev et al. found that mice infected with P. chabaudi had increased numbers of IL‐7 receptor‐expressing lymphoid‐biased MPPs in the BM by day 11 post‐infection, and this was dependent on IFN‐γ signalling in haematopoietic progenitors. 48 Upon isolation and culture ex vivo, these malaria‐induced lymphoid‐biased MPPs lacked erythroid potential and preferentially differentiated into lymphoid and myeloid cells. Similarly, P. berghei infection of mice expands the oligopotent HSC populations in the BM via a mechanism that involved IFN‐γ and IL‐27. 49 These cytokines aided in expanding HSCs in the BM, followed by HSC mobilization to the spleen and induction of rapid myelopoiesis to resolve the infection.

As Plasmodium is found beyond the BM, extramedullary, or non‐BM, haematopoiesis is essential to fight the infection. Like P. berghei, mice infected with P. yoelii display a rapid and sustained increase of progenitor populations in the spleen. 50 , 51 Interestingly, these progenitor cells were essential for establishing splenic immune responses to the parasite through secretion of IL‐17 and activation of local stromal cell populations. The activated stromal cells promoted B‐cell differentiation in vitro when co‐cultured with the expanded splenic progenitors. Further studies have demonstrated the importance of extramedullary haematopoiesis in plasmodium infections. During infection with P. chabaudi, mice have fewer myeloid‐committed progenitors, CMP and GMP, in the BM, while the number of these progenitors increase in the spleen. 52 This was dependent on IFN‐γ‐induced increases in serum CXCL10 and CCL2, which caused mobilization of the CCR2+ CMP and GMP to the spleen.

2.3. Toxoplasma

Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan parasite that infects millions of people around the world. Toxoplasmosis induces a strong type 1 response, which is essential for pathogen elimination and host survival. Indeed, mice lacking IFN‐γ or IL‐12 are highly susceptible to Toxoplasma infections. 23 , 30 , 53 However, unlike Leishmania and Plasmodium infections, many people are undiagnosed and live asymptomatically with the Toxoplasma parasite. In a study of patients with chronic T. gondii, peripheral blood monocytes had significantly altered surface expression of various markers, including immunoglobulin receptors and MHC molecules. 54 Furthermore, IL‐12 mRNA expression was enhanced in monocytes from patients following ex vivo stimulation with Toxoplasma. Since monocytes have a short lifespan, these alterations could potentially be due to infection‐associated modifications to the HSC population. Toxoplasma can invade haematopoietic and non‐haematopoietic cells in the BM. However, due to its global range, and often asymptomatic disease, toxoplasma can go undiagnosed and present potentially fatal risks for patients, in particular those receiving BM transplants. 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 Lopes et al., have shown that infection of BM donor mice with two different strains of T. gondii resulted in decreased survival of recipient mice. 60 T. gondii drastically alters erythropoiesis and skews HSCs towards granulopoiesis which expands effector immune cells that fight infection. 23 , 30 This was recently found to be mediated by the induction of systemic IL‐6 signalling, leading to a reduction in erythrocyte progenitors and a subsequent increase in the GMP population in the BM of infected mice. 61 Importantly, this shift away from erythropoiesis was found to be exclusive to the BM; splenic erythropoiesis was unaffected, highlighting the role of extramedullary haematopoiesis in response to infection.

2.4. Trypanosoma

Trypanosoma species are found throughout the world, although the two most common species Trypanosoma cruzi and T. brucei, the causative agents of Chagas disease and African sleeping sickness, respectively, are found in South America and Africa. Similar to other single‐cell parasites, trypanosomes can infiltrate the BM. Indeed, stromal cells infected with the parasite are found 2 weeks post‐challenge in mice infected with T. cruzi. 62 Parasite infiltration of the BM coincided with an increase in HSC populations, including MPP3/4 and CMPs, with an accompanying decrease in lymphoid‐biased MPPs and CLP. Interestingly, the authors also found a concomitant increase in HSCs in the spleens of infected mice, highlighting again the importance of extramedullary haematopoiesis in counteracting impairments in the BM.

Infection of mice with experimental and field isolates of Trypanosome strains, T. brucei and T. congolense, can rapidly deplete B cells in the BM and spleen. 63 , 64 , 65 Infection of mice with T. cruzi has been shown to infect BM stromal cells, leading to a reduction in IL‐7, an essential cytokine for the differentiation of B cells from progenitor cells. 66 Indeed, reduction in mature B cells has been shown to coincide with severe depletion of up to 95% of CLP, pre‐ and pro‐B cell precursors, and immature B cells in the BM of mice infected with T. brucei. 63 This depletion coincided with an increase in compensatory B‐cell lymphopoiesis in spleens, as indicated by increased numbers of B‐cell precursors and HSCs. In addition to impaired B‐cell lymphopoiesis, whole BM from T. cruzi‐infected mice have a significantly reduced ability to differentiate across many lineages, including myeloid and erythroid, an effect that was transferrable to naïve mice via BM transplantation. 67 However, this is effectively prevented by treatment with anti‐trypanosome therapeutics. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that treatment with commercially available anti‐trypanosome drugs increased the total number of B‐cell precursors in the BM of T. congolense‐infected mice. 63

Long‐lasting disruption to B‐cell lymphopoiesis induced by Trypanosoma species has serious implications for the generation of immune responses to subsequent infections and vaccinations. A recent study demonstrated that infection with T. brucei after immunization with an acellular pertussis vaccine abolished the protective effects of the vaccine against Bordetella pertussis infection. 68 The T. brucei infection post‐vaccination was cleared with an anti‐parasite drug and mice were intranasally challenged with B. pertussis 8 weeks. Mice that had been infected with T. brucei prior to B. pertussis challenge were unable to mount competent B‐cell responses to the bacteria and subsequently were unable to clear the infection from the lung. Conversely, a study that assess the efficacy of T. brucei‐induced killing of B cells in a mouse model of multiple myeloma showed that infected mice survived significantly longer than un‐infected mice, in part due to the potent suppression of B‐cell lymphopoiesis. 69 Collectively, these reports demonstrate that protozoan parasites can invade the BM and modulate haematopoiesis, which impacts the host immune responses to other diseases (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Parasites target HSCs throughout haematopoiesis. Simplified hierarchical view of haematopoiesis, beginning with oligopotent progenitors (LT‐HSC, MPP), followed by lineage‐committed progenitors (CMP, CLP, MEP), then direct precursors (e.g., basophil precursor, MDP, cMoP), and finally mature immune cells. Many parasites modulate this pathway directly and indirectly to improve their survival in the host. This includes, increasing proliferation, enhanced differentiation, or inhibition of development of specific lineages. CLP, common lymphoid progenitor; cMoP, common monocyte precursor; CMP, common myeloid progenitor; HSCs, haematopoietic stem cells; LT‐HSC, long‐term HSC; MDP, macrophage/dendritic cell precursor; MEP, megakaryocyte/erythrocyte progenitor; MPP, multipotent progenitor.

3. PARASITIC WORMS AND HAEMATOPOIESIS

Parasitic worms or helminths, have evolved mechanisms of suppressing host immune responses to prevent their ejection and thereby maintain long‐term infections. The host immune response has also co‐evolved with parasite to limit infection‐associated pathology. Infection with helminths induces a robust type 2 response, characterized by prominent Th2 cells, eosinophils, alternatively activated macrophages, mast cells, basophils, and innate lymphoid type 2 cells (ILC2s). 25 Helminths have developed sophisticated methods of immune modulation to promote chronic infection, including induction of regulatory and anti‐inflammatory immune responses. 25 , 70 , 71 The size and life cycles of helminths, which often include migration through the body and damage to the host, can result in significant immune activation. This mechanical stress, as well as to excreted/secreted factors (ES) produced by the parasites induce release of type 2 alarmins, including IL‐25, IL‐33, and TSLP. These cytokines activate local immune cell populations, induce differentiation of HSCs in the BM, and promote in situ haematopoiesis, for example during infection with the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. 72 , 73

Although not yet fully understood, modifications to BM HSC have been demonstrated during helminth infections. Transplantation of BM from mice susceptible to helminth infection into normally resistant recipient mouse strains can transfer susceptibility to infection. 74 The transfer of susceptibility was specific to the migratory, rather than the tissue, stage of infection with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, suggesting a role for emergency haematopoiesis and production of new circulating immune cells. Babayan et al. found that infection of mice with the filarial nematode Litomosomoides sigmodontis enhanced multipotent progenitor populations in the BM of aged compared with young mice and this correlated with an increase in worm burden. 75 Furthermore, stimulation of HSCs with the filarial nematode product ES‐62 promoted the differentiation of tolerogenic DCs which were hyporesponsive to LPS stimulation and promoted induction of Th2 cells. 76

Infection with the helminths Heligmosomoides polygyrus and N. brasiliensis, used extensively as mouse models of helminth infection, is associated with expansion of basophils in the BM and spleen. H. polygyrus infection induced the expansion of basophil precursors in the BM through the combined effect of IL‐3, IL‐4, and immunoglobulins. 77 IL‐33, released upon mechanical stress, has been shown to indirectly promote the expansion and differentiation of basophils through induction of IL‐3 and GM‐CSF. 78 During infection with Trichuris muris, a mouse model of the human roundworm Trichuris trichiura, TSLP acts directly on precursors in the BM to induce basophil expansion. 79 TSLP can directly induce extramedullary haematopoiesis, expanding splenic GMP‐like cells capable of differentiating into macrophages, dendritic cells, and granulocytes. 80 Transfer of the TSLP‐induced GMP‐like cells into TSLP receptor deficient mice infected with T. muris resulted in improved goblet cell hyperplasia, enhanced type 2 cytokine production and a significantly lower parasite burden. Infections with T. muris or N. brasiliensis induce IL‐25‐dependent increases in a type 2 MPP in the gastrointestinal tract‐associated lymphoid tissues. 81 Interestingly, the increased type 2 MPPs generated by the helminth infections were not found in the spleen or BM. Furthermore, lineage mapping studies showed that these cells were able to differentiate into mast cells, basophils, and macrophages in response to type 2 cytokines. Subsequent studies showed that IL‐33 and IL‐25 were responsible for enhancing ILC2s and the type 2 MPPs in the mesenteric lymph nodes, lungs, and blood. 82 Moreover, when adoptively transferred into mice lacking the IL‐25 receptor, type 2 MPPs differentiated and induced IgE and goblet cell hyperplasia to promote clearance of T. muris infection. Although typically expelled quickly via type 2 inflammation in acute infection, chronic infection with T. muris, initiated by low‐dose infection, induces expansion and proliferation of oligopotent HSCs and neutrophils in the BM. 83 Interestingly, no changes occur to the HSC compartment during acute infections, which are cleared rapidly. Instead, chronic T. muris induces an ineffective type 1 response and expansion of IFN‐γ‐secreting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the BM, resulting in proliferation of LT‐HSC and MPP, culminating in neutrophil expansion and worm persistence.

Infection of mice with the nematode parasite Trichinella spiralis, the parasite responsible for trichinosis, is characterized by rapid expansion of mast cells and basophils from the BM, which migrate to tertiary lymphoid organs, such as the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes, and to the site of infection. 84 , 85 During early infection with T. spiralis, the lineage‐committed progenitors CLP and GMP are significantly expanded, while oligopotent LT‐HSCs and MPPs are unchanged. 86 The study utilized intravital microscopy to show that T. spiralis infection induced a dramatic mobilization, as well as expansion, of HSC. HSCs in infected mice remain largely in their niche, with approximately 12% undergoing some form of movement, however, T. spiralis infection promoted expansion and migration of nearly 60% of HSC from the BM. Furthermore, transplantation of mixed chimera BM from uninfected and infected mice showed that BM from T. spiralis‐infected mice had short‐ and long‐term advantages in repopulating irradiated recipient mice. The study of T. spiralis infection has also led to the discovery of a common erythrocyte‐mast cell progenitor population in the HSC compartment. 87 , 88 Using single‐cell RNA sequencing, Inclan‐Rico and colleagues found that erythrocyte and mast cells progenitors exist at steady state in the BM, spleen, and lymph nodes. However, during T. spiralis infection, these HSCs are activated and mobilized to leave the BM and expand in the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes where they differentiate and replenish mast cells at the site of infection.

In addition to haematopoiesis in the BM, stems cells in the intestine can, under the influence of IL‐4 and IL‐13, expand and differentiate into the secretory tuft and goblet cells required for worm clearance from the gut. 89 , 90 , 91 Mice lacking transcription factors involved in tuft cell differentiation from resident intestinal stem cells were unable to clear infection with N. brasiliensis. 90 Indeed, during N. brasiliensis infection, newly differentiated tuft cells secrete IL‐25, which in turn activates local ILC2s, which initiates a feed‐forward loop to promote proliferation and expansion of tuft cells and protective type 2 immune responses. 89 , 90 , 92 This pathway has been targeted by helminths to enable them to evade expulsion. H. polygyrus infection induces activation and proliferation of intestinal stem cells, however, they have significantly impaired ability to differentiate into tuft cells. 93 , 94 Ex vivo stimulation of intestinal organoids (three‐dimensional structures that mimic the murine intestine) with ES from H. polygyrus (HES) induces proliferation and expansion of stem cells, creating spheroid‐like structures. 93 Interestingly, stimulation with HES, or co‐culture of with larvae, inhibited IL‐4 and IL‐13 induced differentiation of stem cells into tuft cells. Furthermore, co‐infection with H. polygyrus and N. brasiliensis significantly reduced N. brasiliensis‐induced expansion of tuft cells in the gut epithelium. Collectively these studies demonstrate that helminths can modulate haematopoiesis in the BM but also differentiation of stem cells in the intestine (Figure 1).

4. CENTRAL TRAINED INNATE IMMUNITY DURING PARASITE INFECTION

Although initially thought to be exclusive to T and B cells, cells of the innate immune system can undergo training and display features of immunological memory. When primed with certain stimuli, innate immune cells undergo metabolic and epigenetic remodelling before returning to an inactive state. Upon reactivation with PAMPs or cytokines, these primed innate immune cells respond with enhanced effector capabilities. 95 , 96 , 97 This process, termed trained innate immunity, has been demonstrated in NK cells, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. 96 Trained innate immunity has primarily been studied with respect to patrolling and tissue‐resident mature innate immune cells. However, innate immune cells are largely short‐lived, while many studies have reported effects lasting many months, indicating mechanisms of long‐lasting modification to pools of innate immune cells or their progenitors. In recent years, certain pathogens, vaccines, and PAMPs have been reported to induce long‐term alterations to HSCs. This has been termed central trained immunity, where activation by certain stimuli, such as β‐glucan or Mycobacterium tuberculosis, induces metabolic and epigenetic rewiring of HSCs. 98 , 99 This rewiring, or training, is a type of non‐specific memory to inflammatory stimuli, allowing HSCs to respond faster and more acutely to secondary challenge. 100 HSCs, including LT‐HSCs and MPPs, have been identified as targets of central trained immunity. For example, vaccination with BCG expands and modifies MPP, imprinting a bias towards myelopoiesis. 99 Furthermore, macrophages expanded from these MPP have enhanced bacterial killing capacities and increase mRNA expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Research on central trained immunity has largely focused on the modulatory effects of bacterial and fungal products, including LPS, β‐glucan or flagellin, or on pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as IL‐1β and IFN‐γ. 18 , 21 , 99 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 However, recent studies have demonstrated that central trained immunity can also be mediated by parasites (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Central trained innate immunity and parasitic infections. Infection with parasite or administration of parasite‐derived, such as Fasciola hepatica ES or Toxoplasma gondii, act on peripheral innate immune cells and haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to imprint epigenetic modifications that produce trained innate immune cells that respond to secondary stimuli with enhanced responses. Protozoan‐ and helminth‐induced changes to HSCs result in bias towards myelopoiesis and improved engraftment during transplantation. Epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming induces long‐term enhanced effector responses in future generations of innate immune cells, that can modulate development of autoimmunity.

Central trained immunity has been described following infection with the protozoal parasite T. gondii. Mice infected with T. gondii exhibit rapid expansion of monocytes along with increased pro‐inflammatory cytokine production. 105 Askenase et al., found that during infection with T. gondii, IL‐12‐activates BM‐resident NK cells to produce IFN‐γ, which primes the common monocyte precursor (cMoP) and immature monocytes. 105 These primed monocytes developed a regulatory phenotype following stimulation with various PAMPs, such as LPS and flagellin. Importantly, analysis of T. gondii‐primed monocyte gene expression via Nanostring revealed increased expression of both anti‐ and pro‐inflammatory genes after LPS stimulation, indicating a non‐specific augmentation of innate immune responses rather than selective enhancement of anti‐inflammatory response.

We have demonstrated that treatment of mice with ES from the helminth F. hepatica (FHES) imprints a long‐lasting memory on HSCs. 106 Mice treated with FHES had enhanced proliferation and expansion of LT‐HSCs and myeloid‐committed precursors, resulting in expansion of anti‐inflammatory monocytes. This helminth‐induced anti‐inflammatory trained innate immunity rendered the mice less susceptible to induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. The protection against development of Th1‐ and Th17‐driven autoimmune disease persisted for up to 18 months after treatment with the helminth products and could be transferred to naïve mice via transplantation of LT‐HSCs isolated from FHES‐treated mice.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Immune responses to parasitic infections involve a plethora of immune and non‐immune cells, which activate and induce local and systemic modifications to aid in parasite expulsion. Most of the work to date has been done on mature immune cells. However, there is emerging evidence of roles for HSCs in combatting infections. HSCs play a fundamental role in shaping, as well as generating, the cells that mediate innate and adaptive immune responses that are mobilized to act at the site of infection. The HSC provide memory or trained cells of the innate, as well as adaptive, immune system also help to fight future infections and inflammation. Understanding how HSCs are activated and differentiated may aid in the discovery of novel therapeutics for various parasitic infections, but may also help to identify new targets for long‐lasting disease‐modifying treatments for autoimmune and other inflammatory diseases.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Kyle T. Cunningham and Kingston H. G. Mills wrote the review.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/pim.12975.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Open access funding provided by IReL.

Cunningham KT, Mills KHG. Modulation of haematopoiesis by protozoal and helminth parasites. Parasite Immunol. 2023;45(12):e12975. doi: 10.1111/pim.12975

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Fliedner TM, Graessle D, Paulsen C, Reimers K. Structure and function of bone marrow hemopoiesis: mechanisms of response to ionizing radiation exposure. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2002;17(4):405‐426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yona S, Kim KW, Wolf Y, et al. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity. 2013;38(1):79‐91. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Boettcher S, Gerosa RC, Radpour R, et al. Endothelial cells translate pathogen signals into G‐CSF‐driven emergency granulopoiesis. Blood. 2014;124(9):1393‐1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fröbel J, Landspersky T, Percin G, et al. The hematopoietic bone marrow niche ecosystem. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:705410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pinho S, Frenette PS. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:303‐320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cheng H, Zheng Z, Cheng T. New paradigms on hematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Protein and Cell. 2020;11:34‐44. doi: 10.1007/s13238-019-0633-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhang Y, Gao S, Xia J, Liu F. Hematopoietic hierarchy—an updated roadmap. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28:976‐986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cheshier SH, Morrison SJ, Liao X, Weissman IL. In vivo proliferation and cell cycle kinetics of long‐term self‐renewing hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3120‐3125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Schoedel KB, Morcos MNF, Zerjatke T, et al. The bulk of the hematopoietic stem cell population is dispensable for murine steady‐state and stress hematopoiesis. Blood. 2016;128(19):2285‐2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Borghesi L. Signals in hematopoietic stem cells conversion of danger signals into cytokine self‐renewal, lineage fate choice, and the hematopoiesis in steady‐state versus stress. J Immunol. 2018;193:2053‐2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pietras EM, Reynaud D, Kang Y‐A, Stuart JM, Gö B. Functionally distinct subsets of lineage‐biased multipotent progenitors control blood production in normal and regenerative conditions. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:35‐46. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sun J, Ramos A, Chapman B, et al. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature. 2014;514(7522):322‐327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Busch K, Klapproth K, Barile M, et al. Fundamental properties of unperturbed haematopoiesis from stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2015;518(7540):542‐546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sawai CM, Babovic S, Upadhaya S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cells are the major source of multilineage hematopoiesis in adult animals. Immunity. 2016;45(3):597‐609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Muller‐Sieburg CE, Cho RH, Karlsson L, Huang JF, Sieburg HB. Myeloid‐biased hematopoietic stem cells have extensive self‐renewal capacity but generate diminished lymphoid progeny with impaired IL‐7 responsiveness. Blood. 2004;103(11):4111‐4118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. MacLean AL, Smith MA, Liepe J, et al. Single cell phenotyping reveals heterogeneity among hematopoietic stem cells following infection. Stem Cells. 2017;35(11):2292‐2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nagai Y, Garrett KP, Ohta S, et al. Toll‐like receptors on hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulate innate immune system replenishment. 2018;24(6):801‐812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang B, Oyewole‐Said D, Zou J, Willliams IR, Gewirtz AT. TLR5 signaling in murine bone marrow induces hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation and AIDS survival from radiation. Blood Adv. 2017;1(21):1796‐1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Serbina N V, Hohl TM, Cherny M., Pamer EG Selective expansion of the monocytic lineagedirected by bacterial infection. J Immunol. 2009;183(3):1900‐1910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Baldridge MT, King KY, Boles NC, Weksberg DC, Goodell MA. Quiescent haematopoietic stem cells are activated by IFN‐γ in response to chronic infection. Nature. 2010;465(7299):793‐797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Khan N, Downey J, Sanz J, et al. M. Tuberculosis reprograms hematopoietic stem cells to limit myelopoiesis and impair trained immunity. Cell. 2020;183(3):752‐770.e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lopes MF, Zamboni DS, Lujan HD, Rodrigues MM. Immunity to protozoan parasites. J Parasitol Res. 2012;2012:250793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gurung P, Kanneganti TD. Immune responses against protozoan parasites: a focus on the emerging role of nod‐like receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(16):3035‐3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Silva‐Barrios S, Stäger S. Protozoan parasites and type I IFNs. Front Immunol. 2017;8(JAN):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Finlay CM, Walsh KP, Mills KHG. Induction of regulatory cells by helminth parasites: exploitation for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Immunol Rev. 2014;259(1):206‐230. doi: 10.1111/imr.12164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Loukas A, Maizels RM, Hotez PJ. The yin and yang of human soil‐transmitted helminth infections. Int J Parasitol. 2021;51(13–14):1243‐1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Caiado F, Pietras EM, Manz MG. Inflammation as a regulator of hematopoietic stem cell function in disease, aging, and clonal selection. J Exp Med. 2021;218(7):e20201541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhang CC. Hematopoietic stem cells: interplay with immunity. Am J Blood Res. 2012;2(4):219‐227. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sezaki M, Hayashi Y, Wang Y, Johansson A, Umemoto T, Takizawa H. Immuno‐modulation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2020;11:585367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sasai M, Pradipta A, Yamamoto M. Host immune responses to toxoplasma gondii. Int Immunol. 2018;30(3):113‐119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Osorio EY, Medina‐Colorado AA, Travi BL, Melby PC. In‐situ proliferation contributes to the accumulation of myeloid cells in the spleen during progressive experimental visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Poulaki A, Piperaki ET, Voulgarelis M. Effects of visceralising Leishmania on the spleen, liver, and bone marrow: a pathophysiological perspective. Microorg. 2021;9(4):759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Silva JM, Zacarias DA, De Figueirêdo LC, et al. Bone marrow parasite burden among patients with New World kala‐azar is associated with disease severity. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90(4):621‐626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Romano A, Brown N, Ashwin H, et al. Interferon‐γ‐producing CD4+ T cells drive monocyte activation in the bone marrow during experimental Leishmania donovani infection. Front Immunol. 2021;12:700501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Cotterell SEJ, Engwerda CR, Kaye PM. Enhanced hematopoietic activity accompanies parasite expansion in the spleen and bone marrow of mice infected with Leishmania donovani . Infect Immun. 2000;68(4):1840‐1848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cotterell SEJ, Engwerda CR, Kaye PM. Leishmania donovani infection of bone marrow stromal macrophages selectively enhances myelopoiesis, by a mechanism involving GM‐CSF and TNF‐alpha. Blood. 2000;95(5):1642‐1651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Abidin BM, Hammami A, Stä Ger S, Heinonen KM. Infection‐adapted emergency hematopoiesis promotes visceral leishmaniasis. 2017;13:e1006422. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pinto AI, Brown N, Preham O, Doehl JSP, Ashwin H, Kaye PM. TNF signalling drives expansion of bone marrow CD4+ T cells responsible for HSC exhaustion in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(7):e1006465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ferreira FLB, Séguin O, Descoteaux A, Heinonen KM. Persistent cutaneous Leishmania major infection promotes infection‐adapted myelopoiesis. Microorganisms. 2022;10(3):535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kaye P, Scott P. Leishmaniasis: complexity at the host–pathogen interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(8):604‐615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dirkx L, Hendrickx S, Merlot M, et al. Long‐term hematopoietic stem cells as a parasite niche during treatment failure in visceral leishmaniasis. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Venugopal K, Hentzschel F, Valkiūnas G, Marti M. Plasmodium asexual growth and sexual development in the haematopoietic niche of the host. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(3):177‐189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Obaldia N, Meibalan E, Sa JM, et al. Bone marrow is a major parasite reservoir in Plasmodium vivax infection. MBio. 2018;9(3):e00625‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Malleret B, Li A, Zhang R, et al. Plasmodium vivax: restricted tropism and rapid remodeling of CD71‐positive reticulocytes. Blood. 2015;125(8):1314‐1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Baro B, Deroost K, Raiol T, et al. Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in the bone marrow of an acute malaria patient and changes in the erythroid miRNA profile. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(4):e0005365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Silva‐Filho JL, Dos‐Santos JCK, Judice C, et al. Total parasite biomass but not peripheral parasitaemia is associated with endothelial and haematological perturbations in Plasmodium vivax patients. Elife. 2021;10:e71351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Joice R, Nilsson SK, Montgomery J, et al. Plasmodium falciparum transmission stages accumulate in the human bone marrow. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(244):244re5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Belyaev NN, Brown DE, Diaz AIG, et al. Induction of an IL7‐R+c‐Kithi myelolymphoid progenitor critically dependent on IFN‐γ signaling during acute malaria. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(6):477‐485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Furusawa JI, Mizoguchi I, Chiba Y, et al. Promotion of expansion and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells by Interleukin‐27 into myeloid progenitors to control infection in emergency myelopoiesis. PLOS Pathog. 2016;12(3):e1005507. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ghosh D, Brown SL, Stumhofer JS. IL‐17 promotes differentiation of splenic LSK—lymphoid progenitors into B cells following Plasmodium yoelii infection. J Immunol. 2017;199(5):1783‐1795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Ghosh D, Wikenheiser DJ, Kennedy B, et al. An atypical splenic B cell progenitor population supports antibody production during plasmodium infection in mice. J Immunol. 2016;197(5):1788‐1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Belyaev NN, Biró J, Langhorne J, Potocnik AJ. Extramedullary myelopoiesis in malaria depends on mobilization of myeloid‐restricted progenitors by IFN‐γ induced chemokines. PLOS Pathog. 2013;9(6):e1003406. Available from:. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Gazzinelli RT, Hieny S, Wynn TA, Wolf S, Sher A. Interleukin 12 is required for the T‐lymphocyte‐independent induction of interferon gamma by an intracellular parasite and induces resistance in T‐cell‐deficient hosts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;90(13):6115‐6119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ehmen HG, Lüder CGK. Long‐term impact of Toxoplasma gondii infection on human monocytes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Amikura T, Kikuchi T, Kato J, et al. Toxoplasmosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: impact of serostatus‐based management. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23(3):e13506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Schwenk HT, Khan A, Kohlman K, et al. Toxoplasmosis in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(4):292‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Štajner T, Vujić D, Srbljanović J, et al. Risk of reactivated toxoplasmosis in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a prospective cohort study in a setting withholding prophylaxis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(5):733.e1‐733.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Prestes DP, Mendes C, Batista MV, et al. A case‐series of toxoplasmosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: still a concern for endemic countries. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53(10):1336‐1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Rauwolf KK, Floeth M, Kerl K, Schaumburg F, Groll AH. Toxoplasmosis after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation—disease burden and approaches to diagnosis, prevention and management in adults and children. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(3):378‐388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Lopes CS, Silva TL, de Almeida JCN, Costa LVS, Mineo TWP, Mineo JR. Transmission of Toxoplasma gondii infection due to bone marrow transplantation: validation by an experimental model. Front Med. 2019;6:227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Chou DB, Sworder B, Bouladoux N, et al. Stromal‐derived IL‐6 alters the balance of myeloerythroid progenitors during Toxoplasma gondii infection. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;92(1):123‐131. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1011527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Marins‐Dos‐Santos A, Ayres‐Silva J d P, Antunes D, et al. Oral Trypanosoma cruzi acute infection in mice targets primary lymphoid organs and triggers extramedullary hematopoiesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;24(12):301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Cnops J, Bockstal V, De Trez C, Miquel MC, Radwanska M, Magez S. Curative drug treatment of trypanosomosis leads to the restoration of B‐cell lymphopoiesis and splenic B‐cell compartments. Parasite Immunol. 2015;37(9):485‐491. doi: 10.1111/pim.12209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Cnops J, De Trez C, Bulte D, Radwanska M, Ryffel B, Magez S. IFN‐γ mediates early B‐cell loss in experimental African trypanosomosis. Parasite Immunol. 2015;37(9):479‐484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Obishakin E, de Trez C, Magez S. Chronic Trypanosoma congolense infections in mice cause a sustained disruption of the B‐cell homeostasis in the bone marrow and spleen. Parasite Immunol. 2014;36(5):187‐198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Müller U, Schaub GA, Mossmann H, Köhler G, Carsetti R, Hölscher C. Immunosuppression in experimental chagas disease is mediated by an alteration of bone marrow stromal cell function during the acute phase of infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Marcondes MCG, Borelli P, Yoshida N, Russo M. Acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection is associated with anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and bone marrow hypoplasia: reversal by nifurtimox treatment. Microbes Infect. 2000;2(4):347‐352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Radwanska M, HTT N, Magez S. African trypanosomosis obliterates DTPa vaccine‐induced functional memory so that post‐treatment Bordetella pertussis challenge fails to trigger a protective recall response. Vaccines. 2021;9(6):603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. De Beule N, Menu E, Bertrand MJM, et al. Experimental African trypanosome infection suppresses the development of multiple myeloma in mice by inducing intrinsic apoptosis of malignant plasma cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(32):52016‐52025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. McSorley HJ, Hewitson JP, Maizels RM. Immunomodulation by helminth parasites: defining mechanisms and mediators. Int J Parasitol Pergamon. 2013;43:301‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. McSorley HJ, Maizels RM. Helminth infections and host immune regulation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(4):585‐608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Lenzi HL, Lenzi JA, Rosman FC, et al. Extramedullary hematopoiesis in murine schistosomiasis mansoni. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995;90(2):169‐177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Francisco JS, Terra MABL, Klein GCT, Dias de Oliveira BCEP, Pelajo‐Machado M. The hepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis during experimental murine Schistosomiasis mansoni . Front Immunol. 2022;13:955034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Ishikawa N, Horii Y, Nawa Y. Reconstitution by bone marrow grafting of the defective protective capacity at the migratory phase but not at the intestinal phase of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection in W/Wv mice. Parasite Immunol. 1994;16(4):181‐186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1994.tb00338.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Babayan SA, Sinclair A, Duprez JS, Selman C. Chronic helminth infection burden differentially affects haematopoietic cell development while ageing selectively impairs adaptive responses to infection. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1‐12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Goodridge HS, Marshall FA, Wilson EH, et al. In vivo exposure of murine dendritic cell and macrophage bone marrow progenitors to the phosphorylcholine‐containing filarial nematode glycoprotein ES‐62 polarizes their differentiation to an anti‐inflammatory phenotype. Immunology. 2004;113(4):491‐498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Herbst T, Esser J, Prati M, et al. Antibodies and IL‐3 support helminth‐induced basophil expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(37):14954‐14959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117584109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Schneider E, Petit‐Bertron A‐F, Bricard R, et al. IL‐33 activates unprimed murine basophils directly in vitro and induces their In vivo expansion indirectly by promoting hematopoietic growth factor production. J Immunol. 2009;183(6):3591‐3597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Siracusa MC, Saenz SA, Hill DA, et al. TSLP promotes interleukin‐3‐independent basophil haematopoiesis and type 2 inflammation. Nature. 2011;477(7363):229‐233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Siracusa MC, Saenz SA, Tait Wojno ED, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin‐mediated extramedullary hematopoiesis promotes allergic inflammation. Immunity. 2013;39(6):1158‐1170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Saenz SA, Siracusa MC, Perrigoue JG, et al. IL25 elicits a multipotent progenitor cell population that promotes T H 2 cytokine responses. Nature. 2010;464(7293):1362‐1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Saenz SA, Siracusa MC, Monticelli LA, et al. IL‐25 simultaneously elicits distinct populations of innate lymphoid cells and multipotent progenitor type 2 (MPPtype2) cells. J Exp Med. 2013;210(9):1823‐1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Chenery AL, Antignano F, Hughes MR, Burrows K, McNagny KM, Zaph C. Chronic Trichuris muris infection alters hematopoiesis and causes IFN‐γ‐expressing T‐cell accumulation in the mouse bone marrow. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46(11):2587‐2596. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Liu AY, Dwyer DF, Jones TG, et al. Mast cells recruited to mesenteric lymph nodes during helminth infection remain Hypogranular and produce IL‐4 and IL‐6. J Immunol. 2013;190(4):1758‐1766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Grencis RK, Else KJ, Huntley JF, Nishikawa SI. The in vivo role of stem cell factor (c‐kit ligand) on mastocytosis and host protective immunity to the intestinal nematode Trichinella spiralis in mice. Parasite Immunol. 1993;15(1):55‐59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Rashidi NM, Scott MK, Scherf N, et al. In vivo time‐lapse imaging shows diverse niche engagement by quiescent and naturally activated hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2014;124(1):79‐83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Inclan‐Rico JM, Hernandez CM, Henry EK, et al. Trichinella spiralis‐induced mastocytosis and erythropoiesis are simultaneously supported by a bipotent mast cell/erythrocyte precursor cell. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(5):e1008579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Henry EK, Sy CB, Inclan‐Rico JM, et al. Carbonic anhydrase enzymes regulate mast cell–mediated inflammation. J Exp Med. 2016;213(9):1663‐1673. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Gerbe F, Sidot E, Smyth DJ, et al. Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature. 2016;529(7585):226‐230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Gracz AD, Samsa LA, Fordham MJ, et al. SOX4 promotes ATOH1‐independent intestinal secretory differentiation toward tuft and enteroendocrine fates. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1508‐1523.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Duckworth CA. Identifying key regulators of the intestinal stem cell niche. Biochem Soc Trans. 2021;49(5):2163‐2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Lindholm HT, Parmar N, Drurey C, et al. BMP signaling in the intestinal epithelium drives a critical feedback loop to restrain IL‐13‐driven tuft cell hyperplasia. Sci Immunol. 2022;7(71):eabl6543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Drurey C, Lindholm HT, Coakley G, et al. Intestinal epithelial tuft cell induction is negated by a murine helminth and its secreted products. J Exp Med. 2022;219(1):e2021114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Karo‐Atar D, Ouladan S, Javkar T, et al. Helminth‐induced reprogramming of the stem cell compartment inhibits type 2 immunity. J Exp Med. 2022;219(9):e20212311. doi: 10.1084/jem.20212311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Divangahi M, Aaby P, Khader SA, et al. Trained immunity, tolerance, priming and differentiation: distinct immunological processes. Nat Immunol. 2020;22(1):2‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Netea MG, Domínguez‐Andrés J, Barreiro LB, et al. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunology Nature Research. 2020;20:375‐388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Netea MG, Joosten LAB, Latz E, et al. Trained immunity: a program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science. 2016;352:427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Mitroulis I, Ruppova K, Wang B, et al. Modulation of myelopoiesis progenitors is an integral component of trained immunity. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):147‐161.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Kaufmann E, Sanz J, Dunn JL, et al. BCG educates hematopoietic stem cells to generate protective innate immunity against tuberculosis. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):176‐190.e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Chavakis T, Mitroulis I, Hajishengallis G. Hematopoietic progenitor cells as integrative hubs for adaptation to and fine‐tuning of inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:802‐811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. de Laval B, Maurizio J, Kandalla PK, et al. C/EBPβ‐dependent epigenetic memory induces trained immunity in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(5):793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Bomans K, Schenz J, Sztwiertnia I, Schaack D, Weigand MA, Uhle F. Sepsis induces a long‐lasting state of trained immunity in bone marrow monocytes. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Moorlag SJCFM, Rodriguez‐Rosales YA, Gillard J, et al. BCG vaccination induces long‐term functional reprogramming of human neutrophils. Cell Rep. 2020;33(7):108387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Van Der Meer JWM, Barza M, Wolff SM, Dinarello CA. A low dose of recombinant interleukin 1 protects granulocytopenic mice from lethal Gram‐negative infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:1620‐1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Askenase MH, Han SJ, Byrd AL, et al. Bone‐marrow‐resident NK cells prime monocytes for regulatory function during infection. Immunity. 2015;42(6):1130‐1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Cunningham KT, Finlay CM, Mills KHG. Helminth imprinting of hematopoietic stem cells sustains anti‐inflammatory trained innate immunity that attenuates autoimmune disease. J Immunol. 2021;206(7):1618‐1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from Parasite Immunology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES