Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Feb 24;10(5):e27052. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27052

Variants in the ZNF469 gene in families with Brittle cornea syndrome and keratoconus

Qinghong Lin a,b,c,d,e,f,1, Xuejun Wang a,b,c,d,e,1, Tian Han a,b,c,d,e, Xiaoliao Peng a,b,c,d,e, Xingtao Zhou a,b,c,d,e,
PMCID: PMC10909740  PMID: 38439828

Abstract

Background

Brittle cornea syndrome 1 (BCS1) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by corneal and sclera thinning and fragility that is caused by zinc finger protein 469 (ZNF469) gene mutation. Keratoconus is another disease related to corneal thinning. Several reports have linked ZNF469 variants and keratoconus. We recruited a four-generation BCS1 family and two keratoconus families to explore pathogenic ZNF469 variants.

Methods

This study included 11 members from a family with BCS1, 2 families with keratoconus, 368 sporadic keratoconus patients and 325 unrelated healthy controls. Whole exome sequencing of DNA from peripheral blood and cross species conservation analysis was used to investigate and verify ZNF469 variants.

Results

A new homozygous frameshift mutation c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8) in ZNF469 was detected in the BSC1 family. Two ZNF469 heterozygous variants g.88494671G > A (c.793G > A, p.G265S, rs754776767) were detected in keratoconus family 1 and a heterozygous missense variant g.88498262G > A (c.4384G > A, p.D1462 N, rs577890057) was found in keratoconus family 2. Based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, rs577890057 and rs754776767 were predicted to be variants of uncertain significance. c. 6727del (p. Asp2243Thr fs*8) in ZNF469 was identified to be pathogenic.

Conclusions

We identified a new homozygous frameshift mutation and two heterozygous missense variations in ZNF469 in the three families. Our findings extend the spectrum of ZNF469 variants associated with keratoconus.

Keywords: ZNF469, Brittle cornea syndrome, Keratoconus

1. Introduction

Brittle cornea syndrome (BCS) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease characterized by an extremely thin cornea, progressive spherical cornea or keratoconus (KC), high myopia, hearing loss and blue sclera. Patients with BCS have extremely fragile corneas, and even minor injuries can cause corneal rupture or perforation. BCS consists of two subtypes: BCS1 and BCS2. BCS1 is the result of mutation in the ZNF469 gene, which encodes zinc finger protein 469 (ZNF469) [[1], [2], [3], [4]].

Genome-wide association studies have identified central corneal thickness (CCT)-associated loci in healthy European and Asian populations [5,6]. CCT is associated with various diseases that may lead to blindness, such as KC. Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of ZNF469 has suggested that it is strongly associated with CCT, and recent studies have shown that common mutations in ZNF469 influence CCT. Therefore, pathogenic ZNF469 variants are not only pathogenic for BCS1, but these are also a potential risk factor for KC. KC is characterized by a gradual thinning and dilation of the cornea [7,8]. Both sporadic KC cases and KC families with variants in the ZNF469 gene have been identified, which indicates a potential relationship between ZNF469 and KC. ZNF469 is therefore a candidate gene for the KC phenotype [9,10].

In this study, we recruited a four-generation family with BCS1 and two KC families and investigated the pathogenic variants of ZNF469. The relationship between the pathogenic variants of ZNF469 and BC and KC was studied.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Participants and examinations

We recruited 11 participants in this study including 5 members from a family with BCS1 and 6 members from 2 families with KC; this study also included 368 patients with sporadic KC and 325 unrelated healthy controls. Each participant underwent a comprehensive ocular examination including visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, and cornea evaluations using a Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), spherical equivalent diopter (ARK-530A, Nidek, Aichi, Japan) and fundus examination for both eyes. Color fundus photographs (CR-DG10, Canon, Tokyo, Japan) and optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Spectralis OCT, Heidelberg Engineering Gmbh, Germany) were also performed in most of the participants. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Fudan University (Shanghai, China) (approval no. 2022128) and performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Whole exome sequencing and candidate variant screening

Whole exome sequencing of DNA from peripheral blood was performed in four members in the BSC1 family (Ⅳ:1, Ⅳ:2, III:1 and III:2) and all six members in the two KC families using a method described in our previous study [11]. Briefly, the whole exome was captured with SureSelect Human All Exon V6 kit (Agilent) and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Sequencing reads were obtained in the Fastq format. The reads were mapped to human genome GRCh37 using Burrows Wheeler Aligner (BWA). Variants were called using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), followed by variant annotation through ANNOVAR.

Variant discovery and genotyping were performed with GATK (https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/) and annotated with ANNOVAR. Common variants, such as intergenic, upstream, downstream, intronic, and synonymous variants, and variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 1% in the 1000 genome, ExAC, and gnomAD databases, were filtered out. In silico programs were used to predict the deleterious effect of each variant on the function of the proteins, including REVEL, ClinPred, SIFT, Polyphen2, LRT, Mutation Assessor, PROVEAN, CADD, MutationTaster, dbscsnv11_AdaBoost, dbscsnv11_RandomForest, and Human Splicing Finder (HSF). Genotype-phenotype analyses were performed using the Exomiser and Phenolyzer software programs. Finally, the results were read following the standards and guidelines of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

A segregation analysis was performed on these families. Only the mutations shared by members from two families with KC were considered as candidate mutations.

2.3. Variant validation and cross-species conservation analysis

All variants were analyzed by online software including Polyphen2 (genetics.bwh.harvard.edu), SIFT (sift.jcvi.org), FATHMM-MKL (http://fathmm.biocompute.org.uk), CADD v1.4 (cadd.gs.washington.edu), PROVEAN (jcvi.org/research/provean), Mutation Taster (mutationtaster.org) and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sanger sequencing were conducted in other family members and controls to confirm each candidate variant. The PCR primers were designed using Primer3. The validation and analyses were conducted using NCBI VARIANT, NCBI HomoloGene and 1000 Genomes Project databases. Amino acid sequences of both the wild-type and the mutant ZNF469 from Mutalyzer (https://mutalyzer.nl/) were used to predict the three-dimensional (3D) protein structures of ZNF469 by I-TASSER.

2.4. Analysis of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network

We used the STRING database and Cytoscape (v3.9.0) software to analyze the PPI network. Proteins more than or equal to 5° were set as crucial proteins in the PPI network.

2.5. Statistical analysis

For baseline characteristics of the study subjects, patients and controls were matched on gender (χ2 test) and age (T-test). Differences in age were adjusted with logistic regression.

The allele and genotype frequencies of the SNPs were compared between the patients and controls. We evaluated the frequency of the genotypes and alleles in this study using the χ2 test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical manifestations

The family trees of the three families included in this study are shown in Fig. 1a, b and 1c. Information on the family/proband and their characteristics are shown in Table 1. In the BCS1 family, there were two affected individuals (I:2 and IV:1). The proband of this family (IV:1) was a 38 years old male, and vision in the left eye was counting fingers. When the proband was four years old, he underwent enucleation because of a slight collision that resulted in corneal rupture in his right eye. The cornea in the left eye was extremely thin with keratoglobus, and the CCT was approximately 160 μm. The maximum value of keratometry for the left eye was 64.2 D (Fig. 2a). The axis length was 28.59 mm in the left eye. He had high myopia with chorioretinopathy, peripapillary atrophy and macular hemorrhage in the left eye (Fig. 2b). He also had skeletal system abnormalities such as joint hypermobility and flat feet (Fig. 2c and d).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The family trees of the three families included in this study. a: A four-generation Chinese BCS1 family; b: The keratoconus family 1 with two keratoconus patients; c: The keratoconus family 2 with two keratoconus patients. The square indicates male patients and the circle indicates female patients. The solid symbol indicates the affected individual, while the open symbol indicates an unaffected family member. The diagonal line indicates that a family member has passed away. The proband is indicated by an arrow.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the family members in this study.

Family member Gender/Age CCT (μm) Kmax (D) PEC (μm) Surgery Eye disease Genetic finding
BCS1 Family
IV:1 M/38 160 (OS)
NA (OD)
64.2 (OS)
NA (OD)
21 (OS)
NA (OD)
Enucleation (OD) keratoglobus homozygous frameshift mutation c. ZNF469; 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8)
IV:2 M/35 523 (OD)
518 (OS)
45.9 (OD)
45.3 (OS)
5 (OD)
3 (OS)
III:1 M/62 464 (OD)
471 (OS)
47.2 (OD)
46.6 (OS)
9 (OD)
7 (OS)
heterozygous frameshift; ZNF469; 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8)
III:2 F/58 510 (OD)
510 (OS)
45.6 (OD)
45.5 (OS)
4 (OD)
3 (OS)
heterozygous frameshift; ZNF469; 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8)
III:3 F/49 553 (OD)
547 (OS)
47.6 (OD)
47.3 (OS)
11 (OD)
8 (OS)
II:1 F/Passed away NA NA NA NA NA NA
II:2 M/Passed away NA NA NA NA NA NA
II:3 M/Passed away NA NA NA NA NA NA
II:4 F/Passed away NA NA NA NA NA NA
I:1 M/Passed away NA NA NA NA NA NA
I:2 F/Passed away NA NA NA Enucleation (OS) keratoglobus NA
KC Family1
II:1 M/17 475 (OD)
463 (OS)
50.0 (OD)
52.7 (OS)
23 (OD)
49 (OD)
keratoconus heterozygous variants g.88494671G > A (c.793G > A, p.G265S, rs754776767)
I:1 M/37 474 (OD)
472 (OS)
44.1 (OD)
44.3 (OS)
4 (OD)
4 (OS)
keratoconus heterozygous variants g.88494671G > A (c.793G > A, p.G265S, rs754776767)
I:2 F/40 545 (OD)
542 (OS)
42.8 (OD)
44.9 (OS)
3 (OD)
4 (OS)
KC Family2
II:1 M/22 468 (OD)
485 (OS)
53.1 (OD)
45.1 (OS)
40 (OD)
8 (OD)
keratoconus heterozygous missense mutation g.88498262G > A (c.4384G > A, p.D1462 N, rs577890057)
I:1 M/46 563 (OD)
558 (OS)
47.5 (OD)
47.5 (OS)
6 (OD)
9 (OS)
I:2 F/44 449 (OD)
435 (OS)
46.4 (OD)
48.4 (OS)
14 (OD)
30 (OS)
keratoconus heterozygous missense mutation g.88498262G > A (c.4384G > A, p.D1462 N, rs577890057)

M: male, F: Female, OD: right eye; OS: left eye; CCT: central corneal thickness; NA: not available.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Clinical manifestations of family members in the BCS1 family. A: The corneal topography (Pentacam) reports for proband Ⅳ.1 in the BCS1 family. The central corneal thickness was 160 μm. The maximum keratometry value was 64.2 in the left eye; b: Optical coherence tomography showed macular hemorrhage in the left eye; c: Joint hypermobility; d: Flat feet; e: III:1, the central corneal thickness was 464 μm in the right eye and 471 μm in the left eye; f: III:2, the central corneal thickness was 510 μm for both eyes.

III:1 had a CCT of 464 μm in the right eye and 471 μm in the left eye (Fig. 2e). The CCT of both eyes of III:2 was 510 μm (Fig. 2f). I:2 also underwent enucleation in the left eye because of corneal rupture after trauma while taking care of a child.

In KC family 1, two members were diagnosed with KC. The proband (II.1) was a 17-year-old male. The visual acuity in both eyes was 10/50. The corrected distance visual acuity in the right eye with −2.00DS/-1.50 DC × 90° was 20/20 and in the left eye with −2.50 DS/-2.50 DC × 120° was 30/50. The maximum anterior surface curvature (MASC) was 50.0 D in the right eye and 52.7 D in the left eye. The means of posterior elevation of the cornea (PEC) were 23 μm in the right eye and 49 μm in the left eye; the CCT was 475 μm in the right eye and 463 μm in the left eye (Fig. 3a). Belin analysis for patient II.1 showed that the corneal thickness progression deviation (Dp) value was 5.47 in the right eye and 8.81 in the left eye. The Pentacam tomographic composite index (BAD-D) of both eyes demonstrated a marked pathological change (5.42 in the right eye and 7.56 in the left eye) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Clinical manifestations of family members in KC family 1. A: The corneal topography (Pentacam) reports for proband II:1 in KC family 1. The means of posterior elevation of the cornea was 23 μm in the right eye and 49 μm in the left eye. The central corneal thickness was 475 μm in the right eye and 463 μm in the left eye; b: The Belin analysis for patient II.1 showed that the Dp value was 5.47 in the right eye and 8.81 in the left eye. The BAD-D of both eyes demonstrated a marked pathological change (5.42 in right eye and 7.56 in left eye); c: The central corneal thickness of I.1 was 464 μm in the right eye and 471 μm in the left eye; d: Belin analysis of I.1 showed that the BAD-D value in the right eye was in a suspicious state (1.70).

The mother of the proband (I.1) was 37 years old; the CCT was 464 μm in the right eye and 471 μm in the left eye (Fig. 3c), and Belin analysis showed that the BAD-D in the right eye was suspected for KC (1.70, Fig. 3d).

The proband (II.1) of KC family 2 was a 22-year-old male. His presenting visual acuity was 10/50 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. The corrected distance visual acuity in the right eye with −3.50 DS/-3.50 DC × 150° was 20/50 and in the left eye with −0.50 DS was 20/20. The means of PEC were 40 μm in the right eye and 8 μm in the left eye. The MASC was 53.1 D in the right eye and 45.1 D in the left eye. The CCT of the right eye was 468 μm and 485 μm in the left eye (Fig. 4a). Belin analysis of the proband showed that both Dp values were in a suspicious state (6.28 in the right eye and 2.25 in the left eye). The BAD-D demonstrated a marked pathological change in the right eye (6.80 and 2.78 in the right and left eye, respectively) (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Clinical manifestations of family members in KC family 2. a: The corneal topography (Pentacam) reports for proband II:1 in KC family 2. The means of posterior elevation of the cornea was 40 μm in the right eye and 8 μm in the left eye. The maximum anterior surface curvature was 53.1 D (right eye) and 45.1 D (left eye). The central corneal thickness was 468 μm (right eye) and 485 μm (left eye); b: Belin analysis of the proband (II.1) showed that both Dp values were in a suspicious state (6.28 and 2.25 in the right and left eyes, respectively). The BAD-D demonstrated a marked pathological change in the right eye (6.80); c: In I.1, the posterior elevation of the cornea values at the thinnest point of the cornea were within normal range in both eyes (14 and 30 μm in the right and left eyes, respectively). The central corneal thickness was 449 μm in the right eye and 435 μm in the left eye; d: Belin analysis of I.1 showed that BAD-D values were in a suspicious state (2.00 and 5.62 in the right and left eyes, respectively).

The mother of the proband (I.1) was 44 years old. Her presenting visual acuity was 40/50 and corrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes, with −1.00 DS/-1.00 DC × 180° correction in the right eye and −1.50 DS/-1.50 DC × 1500° correction in the left eye. The MASC was 46.4 D (right eye) and 48.4 D (left eye). The PEC value at the thinnest point of the cornea was within the normal range in both eyes (14 and 30 μm in the right and left eye, respectively). She also exhibited central cornea thinning, and the CCT was 449 μm in the right eye and 435 μm in the left eye (Fig. 4c). Belin analysis showed that BAD-D value was in a suspicious state (2.00 and 5.62 in the right and left eye, respectively) (Fig. 4d).

3.2. Identification and analyses of a new variant in ZNF469

Whole exome sequencing results for these three pedigrees were analyzed, and candidate variants were screened (see Supplementary Table 1 for the filtering criteria and the number of variants in each filtering process). The disease-related candidates in the BSC1 family are shown in the Supplemental Table 2. A homozygous frameshift mutation c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8) in ZNF469 with low frequency in general population that matched co-segregation in the BSC1 family was identified. This frameshift mutation occurred in the coding region and was a deletion of guanine at position 6727, which caused an amino acid change (aspartic acid changed to threonine) at residue 2243. After a frameshift of eight amino acids, an early termination codon was induced. III:1 and III:2 carried this heterozygous frameshift mutation, while IV:2 and III:3 did not (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Identification of new variants in the ZNF469 gene. a: A novel homozygous frameshift mutation c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8) in the proband of the BCS1 family; III:1 and III:2 carried a heterozygous frameshift mutation, IV:2 and III:3 were wild-type; b: A heterozygous missense variant g.88494671G > A (c.793G > A, p.G265S, rs754776767) in KC family 1; c: A heterozygous missense variant g.88498262G > A (c.4384G > A, p.D1462 N, rs577890057) in KC family 2; d: Schematic of ZNF469 protein domains and the location of variants.

We also found two ZNF469 heterozygous variants in the two KC families (Supplementary Table 2). The proband in KC family 1 carried a heterozygous missense variant g.88494671G > A (c.793G > A, p.G265S, rs754776767), and the proband in KC family 1 carried a heterozygous missense variant g.88498262G > A (c.4384G > A, p.D1462 N, rs577890057) (Fig. 5b and c). Both variants were absent in other healthy family members and controls. The detection rates of rs754776767, rs577890057 and c. 6727del (p. Asp2243Thr fs*8) in ZNF469 were much higher in the 368 sporadic keratoconus patients compared with the healthy controls (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5).

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the study subjects.

Group Total, n Male, n (%) Female, n (%) Mean age, years
Patients 368 181 (49.18%) 187 (50.82%) 21.39 ± 6.12
Controls 325 156 (48%) 169 (52%) 20.85 ± 5.52

t-test,P = 0.1, χ2 test, P = 0.15.

Table 3.

Distribution of the genotype and allele frequencies of rs754776767 in the patient and control groups.

Group Genotype
Allele
G/G G/A A/A G A
Patients 356 (96.8) 12 (3.2) 0 (0) 724 (98.7) 12 (1.6)
Controls 325 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 650 (100) 0 (0)
p value 0.001 0.001

Data are shown as n (%).

χ2 test.

Table 4.

Distribution of the genotype and allele frequencies of rs577890057 in the patient and control groups.

Group Genotype
Allele
G/G G/A A/A G A
Patients 358 (97.3) 10 (2.7) 0 (0) 726 (98.64) 10 (1.36)
Controls 325 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 650 (100) 0 (0)
p value 0.003 0.003

Data are shown as n (%).

χ2 test

Table 5.

Distribution of the genotype and allele frequencies of c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8) in the patient and control groups.

Group Genotype
Allele
G/G G/- −/− G
Patients 362 (98.4) 6 (1.6) 0 (0) 730 (99.2) 6 (0.8)
Controls 325 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 650 (100) 0 (0)
p value 0.02 0.02

Data are shown as n (%).

χ2 test.

In online prediction programs [12], rs577890057 and rs754776767 were predicted to be variants of uncertain significance (VUS). c. 6727del (p. Asp2243Thr fs*8) in ZNF469 was identified to be pathogenic (Table 6). The report for the cross-species conservation analysis indicated that the glycine at codon 265 and aspartic acid at codon 1462 of ZNF469 are highly conserved (Supplementary Fig. 1). The 3D models of the wild-type protein and these two variants in Fig. 6a and b show the conformational changes caused by this mutation.

Table 6.

Computational predictions and ACMG classification of all identified variants and their frequency in gnomAD genomes.

Nucleotide change Amino acid changea rs number Present in 1 KG data [MAF (%)] Present in gnomAD_genomes Present in EVS data [MAF (%)] SIFT prediction polyphen2 (score) Mutation taster provean
c.793G > A p.G265S rs754776767 NO 0.0000647 NO Tolerated benign
0.116
Polymorphism Neutral
c.4384G > A p.D1462 N rs577890057 NO 0.00003231 NO Damaging Probably damaging
0.991
Polymorphism Neutral
c. 6727del p.Asp2243Thr fs*8 N/A NO NO NO N/A NA disease causing disease causing
Nucleotide change Amino acid changea rs number fathmm MKL (score) grantham _distance conservarion analysis ACMG
c.793G > A p.G265S rs754776767 T (0.047) 56 HC Uncertain significance (PM2_Supporting + PP4)
c.4384G > A p.D1462 N rs577890057 T (0.148) 23 HC Uncertain significance (PM2_Supporting + PP4)
c. 6727del p.Asp2243Thr fs*8 N/A N/A Pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting + PP4)

T: tolerated; HC: highly conserved; PM2: absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium; PP4: patient's phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology; PVS1: null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical±1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function is a known mechanism of disease.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Three-dimensional structures of the proteins showing the sites of variants. The inset pictures are regional enlargements of the variants. a: The three-dimensional structure of wild-type and mutant p.G265S.6b ZNF469; b: The three-dimensional structure of wild-type and mutant p.D1462 N ZNF469.

3.3. Topological analysis of PPI networks

Eight significantly enriched genes were imported to STRING platform to construct a PPI network; it was then imported in Cytoscape to screen the core target genes. As shown in Fig. 7a and b, ZNF469 (with the high degree of 24) was set as a crucial protein and placed in the middle of the PPI network.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Topological analysis of the protein-protein interaction network. a: The protein-protein interaction network constructed by STRING; b: The network of protein-protein interaction performed using Cytoscape.

4. Discussion

In our study, we examined a four-generation consanguineous Chinese BCS1 family and two KC families. In the BCS1 family, two affected family members exhibited corneal rupture from a slight collision. We identified a novel homozygous frameshift mutation c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8) in the ZNF469 gene, which was a deletion of guanine at position 6727 in the coding region that changed an aspartic acid to threonine at residue 2243. After a frameshift of eight amino acids, an early stop codon was induced; we speculate that this may lead to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. According to the ACMG guidelines [12], the mutation is likely to be pathogenic; this mutation is a null variant in a gene where loss-of-function is very strong evidence of pathogenicity (PVS1). In addition, its frequency in the gnomAD population databases is extremely low (PM2) and the phenotype is highly specific for disease, which is supporting-level evidence for pathogenicity (PP4). As a result of this truncation mutation, all seven zinc finger domains are lost, which would lead to protein dysfunction. Previous studies have shown that homozygous Zfp469 loss-of-function mutation causes BCS in a mouse model [13]. From these findings, c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8) should be considered as pathogenic.

We also examined two Chinese families with KC. Two known single nucleotide polymorphisms were detected (rs754776767 in KC family 1 and rs577890057 in KC family 2). According to the ACMG guidelines, rs754776767 is likely to be a VUS, and the frequency in the gnomAD population databases is extremely low (PM2). The phenotype is highly specific for disease, providing supporting-level evidence for pathogenicity (PP4). rs577890057 is also likely to be a VUS; the frequency in the gnomAD population databases is extremely low (PM2). The phenotype is highly specific for disease, which is supporting-level evidence for pathogenicity (PP4). We also used computational toolkits (GERP++) to predict the conservation of the variant and used algorithms (Panther classification system) to investigate the effects of the variant on protein structure and function; these analyses revealed the conservation of this variant as GERP++ score = 3.83 [14]. The Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD) also showed several adjacent sites in ZNF469 (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/ZNF469/unique#object_id=VariantOnTranscriptUnique%2CVariantOnGenome&id=ZNF469&search_transcriptid=00023459&page_size=100&page=2) (Fig. 5d). Therefore, these two SNPs might be associated with KC development in the current patients. Notably, the effects of missense variants within proline rich domains (rs754776767 and rs577890057 are within these domains) are still unclear, and many rare missense variants identified within these domains have been reported as VUS for KC [15,16].

We also found that the distribution of the genotype and allele frequencies of ZNF469 gene was significantly higher in the patient group compared with the control group (All P < 0.05. Table 3 for rs754776767, Table 4 for rs577890057, and Table 5 for c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8). Therefore, these three variants may be associated with the susceptibility to keratoconus. Additionally, regarding c. 6727del (p.Asp2243Thr fs*8), III:1 and III:2 (both are heterozygous c. 6727del) in the family with BCS both showed a thinner cornea compared with other family members who do not carry this variant. As a result, we expect that heterozygous c. 6727del may be associated with the susceptibility to keratoconus, while homozygous c. 6727del is associated with BC. Of note, among the patients carrying ZNF469 variants, none carried two or more ZNF469 variants. Thus, haplotype association analysis was not conducted.

The 3D structural models of the wild-type protein and the two variants suggest that the mutations cause conformational changes in the ZNF469 protein. Thus, we have identified allelic enrichment with potential pathogenicity in ZNF469 of KC patients. Further work is required to determine the functional effects of these variants and the pathways regulated by ZNF469 that play crucial role in the development of KC. The identification of KC-related pathogenic genes also provide a deeper understanding of the genetic basis of CCT mutations.

The ZNF469 gene (NM_001127464) is composed of five exons and encodes ZNF469, a poorly conserved C2H2 zinc finger (C2H2-ZNF) protein. The C2H2-ZNF gene family is the second largest gene family in humans, accounting for 2% of all human genes [17]. The earliest identified members of the C2H2-ZNF family are Xenopus TFIIIA and Drosophila Kruppel, and therefore the genes of this family are commonly referred to as TFIIIA- or Kruppel-type ZNF genes. Most transcription factors encoded by C2H2-ZNF genes bind to DNA, RNA, DNA-RNA hybrids and proteins [18,19]. Many genetic studies have demonstrated a role of ZNF469 in corneal development and suggest that ZNF469 is a determining factor of corneal thickness. ZNF469 also functions in regulating the development and maintenance of the extracellular matrix [20].

In humans, the corneal stroma contributes to 90% of the corneal thickness, and resident keratinocytes deposit to form a collagen-rich extracellular matrix. Multiple genes related to the development and maintenance of extracellular matrix were revealed to be downregulated in the genome-wide expression analysis of ZNF469 mutated fibroblasts, such as EGF-like repeat and discoidin I-like domain-containing protein 3 (EDIL3), collagen alpha-1 (IV) chain (COL4A1), collagen alpha-1 (XI) chain (COL11A1), transforming growth factor beta-2 (TGFb2) and hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 1 (HAPLN1) genes [21]. PPI network analysis also revealed the interaction between ZNF469 and CCT candidate genes, such as COL5A1 and COL1A1. ZNF469 also interacts with other genes that regulate eyeball development, such as VSX1 (causing KC and corneal dystrophy) and CHST14 (Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome candidate gene); thus, variants in ZNF469 also could induce abnormal corneal development through disturbing these pathways. ZNF469 also shows a sequence similarity of 30% with the helical parts of COL1A1, COL1A2 and COL4A1, all of which are highly expressed in the cornea [22]. Some evidence has suggested that KC patients may exhibit an imbalance of collagen homeostasis in keratoconus, because 70% of the components in the cornea are collagen, especially type I collagen [23,24].

Recent studies have confirmed that heterozygous ZNF469 pathological alleles can lead to progressive corneal thinning and dilation, thereby inducing the KC phenotype. Most of the potential pathogenic alleles in KC are missense variants, which may have less harmful effects on protein structure and function than the ZNF469 truncation mutation related to BCS1. This further supports a gene dosage phenomenon, in which homozygous, severely harmful ZNF469 mutations will lead to an early-onset, severe and visually destructive ocular phenotype, while heterozygous missense ZNF469 mutations will usually lead to corneal thinning, dilation and KC.

This study has several limitations. This study included one Chinese pedigree with BCS1, two Chinese pedigrees with keratoconus, 368 sporadic keratoconus patients and 325 unrelated healthy controls. The number of pedigrees is limited. More pedigrees and sporadic cases from an Asian population or population with other ethnic background could improve the statistical results and further validate the findings. While the novel frameshift ZNF469 variant was identified in the BSC1 family, it was considered as pathogenic by silico analysis. Additional animal studies are needed to validate the functionality of this variant. Further investigations are necessary to enhance our understanding of the ZNF469 variants identified in KC family 1 and KC family 2.

5. Conclusion

Our finding of novel variants in the ZNF469 gene in three families has widened the spectrum of ZNF469 variants in BCS and KC. The heterozygous missense mutation of the ZNF469 pathological allele leads to progressive corneal thinning and dilation, resulting in a KC phenotype. The homozygous frameshift variants may have more harmful effects on protein function, and these truncated mutations are usually associated with BCS1. This further supports a gene dosage phenomenon; with the homozygous, severely harmful ZNF469 mutation, extreme corneal thinning and dilation may be induced and eventually lead to corneal rupture, while the heterozygous and missense mutation in the ZNF469 gene is more inclined to lead to KC. Further functional studies and cell-based assays are needed to confirm the molecular pathology and mutation mechanisms associated with these potentially pathogenic ZNF469 alleles.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding statement

This study received partial funding support from the following projects: the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (No. 82000929); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81770955); the Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 20YF1405000); the Project of Shanghai Science and Technology (No. 20410710100); the Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (No. SHDC2020CR1043B); the Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology (No. 2020-015); the Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology (No. XHLHGG202104); the Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care (No. 20DZ2255000); and the construction of a 3D digital intelligent prevention and control platform for the whole life cycle of highly myopic patients in the Yangtze River Delta (No. 21002411600).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qinghong Lin: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Software, Project administration, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xuejun Wang: Writing – original draft, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. Tian Han: Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xiaoliao Peng: Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. Xingtao Zhou: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all of the study participants for their cooperation.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27052.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xlsx (45.9KB, xlsx)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.doc (50.5KB, doc)

figs1.

figs1

References

  • 1.Zlotogora J., BenEzra D., Cohen T., Cohen E. Syndrome of brittle cornea, blue sclera, and joint hyperextensibility. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1990;36:269–272. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320360303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Hussain H., Zeisberger S.M., Huber P.R., Giunta C., Steinmann B. Brittle cornea syndrome and its delineation from the kyphoscoliotic type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS VI): report on 23 patients and review of the literature. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2004;124a:28–34. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burkitt Wright E.M., Porter L.F., Spencer H.L., Clayton-Smith J., Au L., Munier F.L., et al. Brittle cornea syndrome: recognition, molecular diagnosis and management. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dhooge T., Van Damme T., Syx D., Mosquera L.M., Nampoothiri S., Radhakrishnan A., et al. More than meets the eye: Expanding and reviewing the clinical and mutational spectrum of brittle cornea syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2021;42:711–730. doi: 10.1002/humu.24199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vithana E.N., Aung T., Khor C.C., Cornes B.K., Tay W.T., Sim X., et al. Collagen-related genes influence the glaucoma risk factor, central corneal thickness. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011;20:649–658. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu Y., Vitart V., Burdon K.P., Khor C.C., Bykhovskaya Y., Mirshahi A., et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:155–163. doi: 10.1038/ng.2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bykhovskaya Y., Margines B., Rabinowitz Y.S. Genetics in Keratoconus: where are we? Eye Vis (Lond) 2016;3:16. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0047-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Loukovitis E., Sfakianakis K., Syrmakesi P., Tsotridou E., Orfanidou M., Bakaloudi D.R., et al. Genetic Aspects of keratoconus: a literature review exploring potential genetic contributions and possible genetic relationships with comorbidities. Ophthalmol Ther. 2018;7:263–292. doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0144-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lu Y., Dimasi D.P., Hysi P.G., Hewitt A.W., Burdon K.P., Toh T., et al. Common genetic variants near the Brittle Cornea Syndrome locus ZNF469 influence the blinding disease risk factor central corneal thickness. PLoS Genet. 2010;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoehn R., Zeller T., Verhoeven V.J., Grus F., Adler M., Wolfs R.C., et al. Population-based meta-analysis in Caucasians confirms association with COL5A1 and ZNF469 but not COL8A2 with central corneal thickness. Hum. Genet. 2012;131:1783–1793. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin Q., Zheng L., Shen Z. A novel variant in TGFBI causes keratoconus in a two-generation Chinese family. Ophthalmic Genet. 2022;43:159–163. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2021.2015788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of medical genetics and Genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet. Med. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stanton C.M., Findlay A.S., Drake C., Mustafa M.Z., Gautier P., McKie L., et al. A mouse model of brittle cornea syndrome caused by mutation in Zfp469. Dis Model Mech. 2021:14. doi: 10.1242/dmm.049175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pantherdb.org. Available online: http://www.pantherdb.org/tools/csnpScore.do (accessed on 2 December 2022).
  • 15.Lechner J., Porter L.F., Rice A., Vitart V., Armstrong D.J., Schorderet D.F., et al. Enrichment of pathogenic alleles in the brittle cornea gene, ZNF469, in keratoconus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014;23:5527–5535. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vincent A.L., Jordan C.A., Cadzow M.J., Merriman T.R., McGhee C.N. Mutations in the zinc finger protein gene, ZNF469, contribute to the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55:5629–5635. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tadepally H.D., Burger G., Aubry M. Evolution of C2H2-zinc finger genes and subfamilies in mammals: species-specific duplication and loss of clusters, genes and effector domains. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008;8:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schuh R., Aicher W., Gaul U., Côté S., Preiss A., Maier D., et al. A conserved family of nuclear proteins containing structural elements of the finger protein encoded by Krüppel, a Drosophila segmentation gene. Cell. 1986;47:1025–1032. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90817-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laity J.H., Lee B.M., Wright P.E. Zinc finger proteins: new insights into structural and functional diversity. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001;11:39–46. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rohrbach M., Spencer H.L., Porter L.F., Burkitt-Wright E.M., Bürer C., Janecke A., et al. ZNF469 frequently mutated in the brittle cornea syndrome (BCS) is a single exon gene possibly regulating the expression of several extracellular matrix components. Mol. Genet. Metabol. 2013;109:289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Burkitt Wright E.M.M., Spencer H.L., Daly S.B., Manson F.D.C., Zeef L.A.H., Urquhart J., et al. Mutations in PRDM5 in brittle cornea syndrome identify a pathway regulating extracellular matrix development and maintenance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;88:767–777. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abu A., Frydman M., Marek D., Pras E., Nir U., Reznik-Wolf H., et al. Deleterious mutations in the Zinc-Finger 469 gene cause brittle cornea syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;82:1217–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Critchfield J.W., Calandra A.J., Nesburn A.B., Kenney M.C. Keratoconus: I. Biochemical studies. Exp. Eye Res. 1988;46:953–963. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(88)80047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kenney M.C., Nesburn A.B., Burgeson R.E., Butkowski R.J., Ljubimov A.V. Abnormalities of the extracellular matrix in keratoconus corneas. Cornea. 1997;16:345–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.xlsx (45.9KB, xlsx)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.doc (50.5KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES