Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
. 2024 Mar 3;10(2):e864. doi: 10.1002/cre2.864

Antibacterial coating of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with silver and bismuth nanofilms by magnetron sputtering: A feasibility study

Andrea Schubert 1, Carolin Griesmüller 1, Nikolaus Gersdorff 1, Ralf Bürgers 1, Bernhard Wiechens 2, Torsten Wassmann 1,
PMCID: PMC10909824  PMID: 38433291

Abstract

Objectives

Magnetron sputtering was evaluated to equip surfaces of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with silver and bismuth nanofilms.

Material and Methods

Antibacterial properties were evaluated by the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans. Polyurethane‐based elastomeric ligatures were coated with silver and bismuth nanofilms via direct current magnetron sputtering. Surface roughness (R a) and surface‐free energy (SFE) were assessed. Coated specimens were incubated with S. mutans for 2 h. Adhering bacteria were visualized by Hoechst staining and quantified by an ATP‐based luminescence assay. One‐way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc testing and Pearson correlation analysis were performed (p < .05) to relate bacterial adhesion to surface roughness and surface‐free energy.

Results

Elastomeric ligatures were successfully coated with silver and bismuth nanofilms. R a was significantly reduced by silver coating. Silver and bismuth coatings showed significantly higher SFE than controls. Adhesion of S. mutans was significantly decreased by silver coating. No correlation between bacterial adhesion and SFE was found. Correlation between bacterial adhesion and R a was positive but not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Magnetron sputtering proved to be a feasible method to equip orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with silver and bismuth nanofilms. Silver coatings of elastomeric ligatures may reduce white spots and carious lesions in orthodontic patients. Future research is required to stabilize coatings.

Keywords: elastomeric ligatures, magnetron sputtering, microbial adhesion, nanoparticles

1. INTRODUCTION

During orthodontic treatment, fixed appliances complicate oral hygiene while simultaneously creating retentive niches for microbial accumulation (Atack et al., 1996; Balenseifen & Madonia, 1970; Gwinnett & Ceen, 1979). While microbial adhesion to dental hard tissue does not necessarily have pathological consequences per se, a dental biofilm can develop cariogenic properties due to a dysbiosis of the oral microbiome (Johansson et al., 2016). An oral dysbiosis can be modulated by dietary habits and is manifested in an altered, potentially pathological composition of dental biofilms (Kahharova et al., 2023; Pitts et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). Among the multiple microorganisms present in dental biofilms, Streptococcus mutans is considered a primary causative agent for enamel decalcification due to its ability to produce lactic acid by processing low molecular weight oligosaccharides (Hamada & Slade, 1980; Legéňová & Bujdáková, 2015; Loesche, 1986). In the presence of fixed orthodontic appliances, levels of S. mutans are elevated in the saliva and dental plaque of patients (Lundstrom & Krasse, 1987; Pellegrini et al., 2009; Rosenbloom & Tinanoff, 1991). White spots and carious lesions of the adjacent enamel are prevalent adverse side effects of fixed orthodontic treatment (Enaia et al., 2011; Gorelick et al., 1982; Ogaard et al., 1988; Richter et al., 2011; Sundararaj et al., 2015; Tufekci et al., 2011).

Common strategies to prevent enamel decalcification during orthodontic treatment include mechanical plaque debridement, individual hygiene instructions, fluoride application, and the use of antimicrobial mouthwashes (Geiger et al. 19881992; Harvey & Powell, 1981; Srivastava et al., 2013). However, all of these approaches depend on the patient's individual motivation and compliance (Geiger et al. 19881992; Hadler‐Olsen et al., 2012). Orthodontic appliances with antibacterial properties would be of great clinical value to limit bacterial adhesion regardless of patient compliance.

Besides brackets that are bonded to the tooth surface, ligatures that secure arch wires to bracket slots are prone to microbial adhesion (Forsberg et al., 1991; Gastel et al., 2009; Papaioannou et al., 2007). Due to their advantageous handling, elastomeric polyurethane‐based ligatures are widely used by clinicians nowadays, although they are associated with higher levels of bacterial adhesion than conventional steel ligatures (Forsberg et al., 1991). Some attempts to modify elastomeric ligatures to reduce bacterial adhesion have been reported in the literature but were not found to be effective: the assessment of fluoride‐releasing elastomeric ligatures showed no long‐term clinical efficacy in reducing S. mutans counts in saliva or plaque (Miura et al., 2007; Wilson & Gregory, 1995). Hydrogel‐polymer coating of elastomeric ligatures to smoothen surfaces did not exhibit antibacterial properties (Magno et al., 2008).

Various dental materials including titanium implants, resin composites, and temporary filling materials have been successfully equipped with antimicrobial properties by incorporating metallic agents, with silver and bismuth particles attracting particular attention (Chen et al., 2010; Gosau et al., 2015; Hotta et al., 1998; Yamamoto et al., 1996; Yoshida et al., 1999). However, for silverized elastomeric ligatures, evidence about antimicrobial properties in vivo is conflicting. A product that releases silver ions from silver‐zeolite integrated into an elastomeric structure showed a reduction of periodontal pathogens and gingival inflammation in a study by Caccianiga et al. (2012), while no significant antimicrobial effect was reported by Kim et al. (2012). The authors suggested that the concentration of silver ions at the surface of the ligatures was insufficient for significant antimicrobial effects.

Poor surface concentrations of metallic agents could be overcome by coating material surfaces with metallic nanoparticles, which are insoluble particles with a size of less than 100 nm that show a high surface‐to‐volume ratio. This allows them to interact closely with microbial membranes and provides a large surface area for antimicrobial activity (Cushing et al., 2004; Morones et al., 2005; Verran et al., 2007). The antibacterial effect of metallic nanoparticles consists of several mechanisms including the disruption of bacterial metabolic processes, interactions with bacterial DNA, and the increase of the cytoplasmatic membrane permeability (Eckhardt et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2000; Lok et al., 2006; Morones et al., 2005).

In a recent in vitro study, elastomeric ligatures decorated with plant‐extracted silver nanoparticles showed antibacterial potential (Cabral‐Romero et al., 2013). While this elaborated technology is a sustainable approach for the future of surface treatment, easy‐to‐perform and well‐established technologies remain relevant at the present. Among those, magnetron sputtering is a widely performed state‐of‐the‐art technology used to coat textiles and biomedical products with metallic nanofilms (Alvarez et al., 2019; Berumen et al., 2019; Miśkiewicz et al., 2019; Rtimi et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2018). It combines the advantages of controllable film thickness, easy procedure, satisfactory adhesion to the target substratum, and high purity of the deposited metal (Kylián et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2018). Hence, magnetron sputtering could be an effective method to equip surfaces of elastomeric ligatures with silver and bismuth nanofilms that, to our knowledge, has not yet been assessed.

In the present in vitro study, the feasibility of coating elastomeric ligatures with silver and bismuth nanofilms by magnetron sputtering was evaluated. In addition to the surface characteristics, the antibacterial properties of the nanofilms were investigated by assessing S. mutans adhesion.

2. METHODS

2.1. Specimen preparation

Cylindrical specimens (diameter: 10 mm, height: 1.5 mm) were obtained from a polyurethane‐based material used for elastomeric ligatures (Sani‐Tie®, Dentsply Sirona). Specimens were cleaned with 99% isopropanol and deionized water in a 1:1 ratio with ultrasound assistance and then dried. Coating of the specimens with nanoparticles of silver and bismuth was performed by direct current magnetron sputtering (Wasa et al., 2012) at the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB using the following setup: Power supply was provided by a direct current generator (PFG 2500 DC, Trumpf Hüttinger GmbH & Co. KG). Before the metallic coating was performed, plasma activation of specimen surfaces was carried out for 1 min using radio frequency plasma (13.67 MHz) at a radio frequency power of 40 W provided by an AGC‐5 generator (Eni Power Systems) under impedance matching (viking impedance matching network, Nye Company). The subsequent coating process was carried out with a continuous flow of argon gas, which was controlled by a needle valve. The base pressure and the pressure during the coating process were continuously controlled by a ionization vacuum gauge (Ionivac Granville‐Phillips®, MKS Instruments), a vacuum gauge (Convectron Granville‐Phillips® Pirani, MKS Instruments), and a capacitance manometer (Baratron®, MKS Instruments). After reaching the base pressure of 2.1–6 mbar, argon was fed into the sputtering system and the process pressure of 6 µbar was set via the gas flow. The coating process with silver and bismuth nanoparticles was each carried out at a current of 0.4 A for 5 min. Both plasma activation and the coating process were performed under a continuous vacuum environment.

2.2. Surface roughness and topography

The arithmetical mean roughness values (R a) were calculated by five independent measurements using widefield confocal microscopy (Zeiss Smartproof 5, Carl Zeiss) and automated software analysis (ConfoMap ST 7.4.8076, Carl Zeiss). Surface imaging was performed by a Zeiss Object Lens C Epiplan‐APOCHROMAT (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH) with 20‐fold magnification. Images of true‐color surface topography and three‐dimensional surface texture were generated with the help of ConfoMap‐Software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH).

2.3. Surface‐free energy

To determine surface‐free energy, at least nine independent contact angle measurements were performed: 1 µL of distilled water and 1 µL of methylene iodide were applied to the specimen's surface. Within 30 s after application, a computer‐aided measurement device (Drop Shape Analyzer DSA 25, Krüss) performed 10 contact angle measurements for each liquid. The surface‐free energy was calculated using the method by Owens and Wendt (1969).

2.4. Microbial culture

S. mutans (strain 20523; DSMZ) was cultured in sterile trypticase soy broth (Tryptic Soy Broth; BD Diagnostics) supplemented with yeast extract (Sigma‐Aldrich) at 37°C and 55 rpm for 16 h. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS, Merck), and resuspended in PBS. Using densitometry (Bio Photometer, Eppendorf), the suspension was adjusted to an optical density of 0.3 at 600 nm.

2.5. Luminescence assay

Under sterile conditions, uncoated and coated elastomeric specimens (n = min. 23) were transferred to 24‐well plates and attached to well bottoms using silicone (Z‐Dupe, Henry Schein Dental). Then, 1 mL of S. mutans suspension was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and 55 rpm. The viable cells were quantified using an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)‐based luminescence assay (LT07‐221, Lonza): after washing with PBS twice to remove non‐adherent cells, 300 µL of a cell lysis reagent were added to each well to extract ATP. After 10 min, 100 µL of the supernatants were transferred to a 96‐well plate, where 100 µL of ATP monitoring reagent plus were added to each well. After 5 min of incubation, luminescence was measured using a plate reader (FLUOstar Omega, BMG Labtech) at a preset gain of 4000. The relative luminescence of PBS and pure bacterial solution served as control references.

2.6. Bacterial staining

Exemplary Hoechst staining was performed for each test group after bacterial incubation: silver and bismuth‐coated elastomeric specimens and uncoated controls were washed three times with 0.85% saline. Then, 1 mL bisbenzimide H 33342 trihydrochloride (Sigma Aldrich) was added to each specimen for 15 min. Staining solution was removed by washing three times with 0.85% saline. S. mutans cultures were fixated using 8% paraformaldehyde solution. Specimens were dried for 10 min, then mounted on object slides. Visualization was carried out using fluorescence microscopy (BZ‐X710, Keyence).

2.7. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software). The overall level for significance was set at α = .05. Surface roughness and surface‐free energy data are shown as means and standard deviations. Data from the ATP luminescence assay are shown as medians with box‐and‐whisker plots. For the analysis of surface roughness, surface‐free energy, and bacterial adhesion, data were tested for normal distribution (Q–Q plotting and Shapiro–Wilk test) and variance homogeneity (Levene's test). Then, one‐way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc analysis were performed. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between surface roughness and microbial adhesion or surface‐free energy and microbial adhesion, respectively.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Surface characteristics

Exemplary true‐color surface imaging showed the surface topography of the elastomeric ligatures after deposition of silver and bismuth nanofilms by magnetron sputtering (Figure 1a). The uncoated controls showed ubiquitous scratches and dents. Silver‐coated surfaces were more finely textured with visible pits and scratches while bismuth coating displayed more homogeneous surfaces. Three‐dimensional surface texture imaging revealed smoother surfaces of silver and bismuth‐coated elastomeric ligatures compared to uncoated controls (Figure 1b). Corresponding arithmetic mean roughness (R a) and surface‐free energy are shown in Table 1. Silver sputtered surfaces were significantly smoother (p < .0001) than uncoated and bismuth coated ligatures. Bismuth sputtered surfaces were not significantly smoother than uncoated controls (p = .328). Both silver and bismuth sputtered surfaces showed significantly higher surface‐free energy values than uncoated controls (p < .0001). Sputtering ligatures with bismuth significantly increased surface‐free energy compared to sputtering with silver (p < .001).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Surface characteristics of elastomeric ligatures after magnetron sputtering with silver and bismuth. (a) True‐color surface imaging shows the silver and bismuth nanofilms of the specimens. Uncoated controls show ubiquitous scratches and dents, silver coating is finer in structure with visible scratches and pits, bismuth coating displays the most homogeneous surface. (b) Three‐dimensional surface texture reveals smoother surfaces of silver‐coated specimens compared to bismuth‐coated and uncoated specimens indicated by peaks with small amplitudes.

Table 1.

Surface characteristics of the investigated elastomeric ligature modifications.

Surface modification R a (µm) Surface free energy (mN/m)
Silver coating 0.31 ± 0.01ab 69.69 ± 1.41cd
Bismuth coating 2.15 ± 0.11a 73.92 ± 1.48ce
Uncoated control 2.05 ± 0.15b 62.93 ± 3.78de

Note: Data are expressed as means and standard deviations. Equal letters indicate significant differences (see text for level of significance).

3.2. Bacterial adhesion

Hoechst staining (Figure 2a) was performed to visualize the adhesion of S. mutans to the investigated coated and uncoated elastomeric ligatures. S. mutans cells accumulated in typical chain formations on the surfaces of the specimens. There was a tendency for lower bacterial adhesion on silver‐coated specimens. The ATP assay (Figure 2b) revealed significantly less bacterial adhesion to silver‐coated specimens than to control specimens. Bismuth coating did not result in significantly reduced adhesion of S. mutans.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to the investigated silver‐ and bismuth‐coated elastomeric specimens. (a) Hoechst staining shows typical chain formations of S. mutans cells. The surface of the uncoated control shows strong auto fluorescence. There is a tendency for lower bacterial accumulation on silver‐coated specimens. (b) Results of the luminescence assay show significantly lower adhesion of S. mutans to silver‐coated specimens compared to uncoated controls. *p < .05.

Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive but insignificant correlation between surface roughness and bacterial adhesion (correlation coefficient r = .9821, p = .1205). There was no correlation between surface‐free energy and bacterial adhesion (r = −.2688, p = .8267).

4. CONCLUSION

Fixed orthodontic devices tend to accumulate microorganisms and complicate patients’ oral hygiene. White spots and carious lesions are undesirable biofilm‐associated side effects of fixed orthodontic therapy (Bergstrand, 2011; Lovrov et al., 2007; Ogaard et al., 1988; O'Reilly & Featherstone, 1987; Richter et al., 2011). To equip the surfaces of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with antimicrobial properties, the present study assessed magnetron sputtering as a method to deposit silver and bismuth nanofilms on orthodontic elastomeric ligatures.

Widefield confocal microscopy revealed successful deposition of nanofilms on the surface of elastomeric ligatures. Surface imaging showed homogeneous surfaces in bismuth‐coated specimens. Silver coating was heterogeneous but finer in texture than uncoated controls which showed ubiquitous scratches and dents. In contrast to the visual impression, surface roughness was significantly decreased by silver‐sputtering while bismuth‐sputtering had no significant effect on surface roughness compared to uncoated controls. This finding is in line with a study on titanium implants by Gosau et al., in which bismuth coating by magnetron sputtering was associated with rougher surfaces than silver coating, possibly due to the crystal nanostructure of bismuth (Gosau et al., 2015) that was not detectable by confocal microscopy in the present study.

Adhesion of S. mutans to coated and uncoated specimens was visualized by Hoechst staining, an established method for assessing bacterial colonization (Dai et al., 2020; Schubert et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). A state‐of‐the‐art ATP‐based luminescence assay with high reproducibility and sensitivity was performed to quantify the adhered bacteria (Almohandes et al., 2021; Crouch et al., 1993; Dexter et al., 2003; Hahnel et al., 2008; Schubert et al., 2021; Wassmann et al., 2020). Silver coating resulted in a significant decrease of S. mutans adhesion compared to uncoated controls. Similar antimicrobial effects of silver have been reported for various dental materials. Resin composites loaded with high concentrations of silver‐containing fillers showed significant inhibitory effects on S. mutans growth (Yoshida et al., 1999). Titanium implants coated with silver showed antimicrobial effects against S. epidermidis (Gosau et al., 2015) and silver‐containing temporary filling materials exhibited antibacterial activity against oral streptococci in vitro (Hotta et al., 1998; Yamamoto et al., 1996). In elastomeric ligatures, however, the antimicrobial effect of silver ions within a porous crystalline network was insignificant against S. mutans (Kim et al., 2012). Low surface concentrations of silver ions have been discussed as a possible reason for the insufficient antimicrobial effects. From the results of the ATP‐assay performed in the present study, it can be assumed that magnetron sputtering is a suitable method to equip surfaces of elastomeric ligatures with sufficiently high concentrations of silver nanoparticles to achieve antimicrobial effects.

Bismuth coating showed a tendency for reduced adhesion of S. mutans compared to uncoated controls. However, the effect was weaker than the one exerted by silver. Due to a lack of studies, our results cannot be compared with other findings on bismuth‐coated orthodontic devices. However, there are multiple investigations on bismuth‐coated dental implants with both significant and insignificant antibacterial effects being reported (Almohandes et al., 2021; Ciobanu & Harja, 2019; Gosau et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2013). In calcium phosphate cement, bismuth had a potent antimicrobial activity relevant for root canal fillings. The antibacterial effect of bismuth remains controversial and needs further investigation. Based on our data, silver coating is preferable to bismuth coating to achieve antibacterial effects in elastomeric ligatures.

For the interpretation of the results from the adhesion assay, the influence of surface properties on microbial adhesion should be considered in addition to the effects attributed to the metallic nanoparticles. The influence of surface roughness on microbial adhesion to dental materials has been widely discussed in the literature, and, in general, rough surfaces are more susceptible to bacterial adhesion than smooth surfaces (Quirynen et al., 19931996; Teughels et al., 2006; Yoda et al., 2014). This can be explained by larger surface areas exhibited by rough surfaces which increases the absolute number of bacterial cells and by better protection of bacteria from shear forces which facilitates initial cell adhesion (Scheuerman et al., 1998; Teughels et al., 2006). Reducing surface roughness of elastomeric ligatures to minimize bacterial adhesion has already been subject of research: Magno et al. performed an in vivo study on elastomeric ligatures coated with a hydrogel‐polymer that is claimed to turn into a highly smooth surface when moistened. However, adhesion of S. mutans was not reduced by this surface modification, possibly due to detachment of the coating and fissures in the surface after traction of ligatures during clinical application (Magno et al., 2008). In contrast to this finding, Pearson correlation analysis in the present study showed a positive, albeit not significant, correlation between surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. This tendency suggests that the significantly lower adhesion of S. mutans to silver‐coated ligatures compared with uncoated controls may be explained in part by the significantly lower surface roughness.

In addition to surface roughness, surface‐free energy is a predominant factor influencing microbial adhesion to solid surfaces and has been assessed for various dental materials (Arima & Iwata, 2007; Hahnel et al., 2008; Lee et al., 1998). Depending on the experimental settings and conditions, variations of surface‐free energy may have stimulating or reducing effects on microbial adhesion (D'Ercole et al., 2020; Wassmann et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2004). For the adhesion of S. mutans to dental composite resins, both insignificant and significant correlations with surface‐free energy have been shown (Bilgili et al., 2020; Jeon et al., 2020; Mandracci et al., 2015). To our knowledge, there is currently no evidence about the effect of surface‐free energy on the adhesion of S. mutans to elastomeric ligatures. In the present study, both silver and bismuth coating resulted in a significant increase of surface‐free energy. Yet, statistical analysis suggests no significant correlation between surface‐free energy and the adhesion of S. mutans in the performed investigations. The present data on silver and bismuth‐coated elastomeric ligatures indicate that surface roughness had a greater influence on bacterial adhesion than surface‐free energy. Details about the complex interaction of biological and physicochemical mechanisms behind microbial adhesion to dental materials, especially those coated with metallic nanofilms, remain to be elucidated by future research.

As mentioned, caries can be seen as a potential consequence of a dysbiosis of the oral microbiome (Atack et al., 1996; Johansson et al., 2016). This implies a process of complex interaction of the oral microbiota, which can be illustrated by the successive maturation and growth phases of an oral biofilm. A mature multispecies biofilm exhibits properties, for example, resistance to environmental changes, that individual species do not (Kolenbrander et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2020). The interactions in a biofilm, which can ultimately become cariogenic, are therefore the subject of current research and are difficult to simulate under in vitro conditions. The exact identification of the cariogenic microorganisms is also inconclusive, but Streptococcus mutans, as examined in this study, has the highest detection rate in caries patients (Bhaumik et al., 2021; Ev et al., 2023). An exemplary observation of a single species therefore does not represent the complexity or resilience of a biofilm, but can provide reliable findings before more complex or even in vivo tests.

Generally, the present study showed the feasibility of the investigated magnetron sputtering procedure. Silver and bismuth nanofilms were successfully deposited onto the surface of elastomeric ligatures. However, the nature of both metallic coatings was rather unstable as stretching or moistening of the coated ligatures resulted in partial detachment of the nanofilms, a phenomenon that has been described for hydrogel‐polymer coatings as well (Magno et al., 2008). Under in vivo conditions, ligatures are stretched to place them around brackets. Moreover, they are exposed to stresses like chewing, tonicity of the lips, saliva, and oral hygiene procedures. Based on the results of the present investigation, it can be assumed that the adhesion of the silver and bismuth nanoparticles to the ligature surface is not sufficient to withstand the clinical conditions during orthodontic treatment. Hence, the conclusions drawn from the present in vitro study must be considered preliminary until in vivo data is available. Considering the cytotoxic potential of metallic nanoparticles, their detachment and swallowing may cause adverse local or systemic side effects (Fu et al., 2014; Pérez‐Díaz et al., 2015; Składanowski et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2014). While the present study showed the potential to reduce microbial adhesion to elastomeric ligatures by silver and bismuth nanofilms, future research is necessary to provide stable and lasting coatings. Also, their biocompatibility should be assessed by evaluating cytotoxic effects.

The present in vitro study suggests that magnetron sputtering is a feasible method to deposit silver and bismuth nanofilms to orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Silver nanofilms exerted a significant antibacterial effect with potential clinical relevance to reduce white spots and carious lesions in orthodontic patients. Future research is required to stabilize the metallic coating to withstand in vivo conditions.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Andrea Schubert: Validation; formal analysis; writing—original draft; visualization. Carolin Griesmüller: Formal analysis; investigation. Nikolaus Gersdorff: Conceptualization. Ralf Bürgers: Conceptualization; methodology; resources; writing—review and editing; supervision; project administration. Bernhard Wiechens: Investigation; writing—review and editing; supervision. Torsten Wassmann: Methodology; validation; formal analysis; writing—review and editing; visualization; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Jacob Barz and Bentsian Elkin of the Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB (Stuttgart, Germany) for executing magnetron sputtering of the ligatures, and Xenia Schulz of the Department of Medical Statistics (University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany) for providing support with the statistical analyses. We acknowledge support by the German Research Foundation and the Open Access Publication Funds of the University of Goettingen. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Schubert, A. , Griesmüller, C. , Gersdorff, N. , Bürgers, R. , Wiechens, B. , & Wassmann, T. (2024). Antibacterial coating of orthodontic elastomeric ligatures with silver and bismuth nanofilms by magnetron sputtering: A feasibility study. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 10, e864. 10.1002/cre2.864

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data presented in this publication are openly available in the data repository “Göttingen Research Online” (https://doi.org/10.25625/DOSOZ9).

REFERENCES

  1. Almohandes, A. , Abrahamsson, I. , Dahlén, G. , & Berglundh, T. (2021). Effect of biofilm formation on implant abutments with an anti‐bacterial coating: A pre‐clinical in vivo study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32, 756–766. 10.1111/clr.13745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez, R. , Muñoz‐Piña, S. , González, M. U. , Izquierdo‐Barba, I. , Fernández‐Martínez, I. , Rico, V. , Arcos, D. , García‐Valenzuela, A. , Palmero, A. , Vallet‐Regi, M. , González‐Elipe, A. R. , & García‐Martín, J. M. (2019). Antibacterial nanostructured ti coatings by magnetron sputtering: From laboratory scales to industrial reactors. Nanomaterials, 9, 1217. 10.3390/nano9091217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arima, Y. , & Iwata, H. (2007). Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well‐defined mixed self‐assembled monolayers. Biomaterials, 28, 3074–3082. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atack, N. E. , Sandy, J. R. , & Addy, M. (1996). Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. Journal of Periodontology, 67, 78–85. 10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balenseifen, J. W. , & Madonia, J. V. (1970). Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. Journal of Dental Research, 49, 320–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergstrand, F. (2011). A review on prevention and treatment of post‐orthodontic white spot lesions—Evidence‐based methods and emerging technologies. The Open Dentistry Journal, 5, 158–162. 10.2174/1874210601105010158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berumen, J. O. , De la Mora, T. , López‐Perrusquia, N. , Jiménez‐Palomar, I. , Muhl, S. , Hernández‐Navarro, C. , & García, E. (2019). Structural, chemical and mechanical study of TiAlV film on UHMWPE produced by DC magnetron sputtering. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 93, 23–30. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhaumik, D. , Manikandan, D. , & Foxman, B. (2021). Cariogenic and oral health taxa in the oral cavity among children and adults: A scoping review. Archives of Oral Biology, 129, 105204. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bilgili, D. , Dündar, A. , Barutçugil, Ç. , Tayfun, D. , & Özyurt, Ö. K. (2020). Surface properties and bacterial adhesion of bulk‐fill composite resins. Journal of Dentistry, 95, 103317. 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cabral‐Romero, C. , Hernandez‐Delgadillo, R. , Velasco‐Arias, J. J. , Martinez‐Sanmiguel, D. , Diaz, D. , Zumeta‐Dubé, K. , & Niño‐Arevalo, C. (2013). Bismuth oxide aqueous colloidal nanoparticles inhibit Candida Albicans growth and biofilm formation. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 8, 1645–1652. 10.2147/IJN.S38708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Caccianiga, G. , Ordesi, P. , Cambini, A. , Stanizzi, A. , Denotti, G. , & Fumagalli, T. (2012). Evaluation about antimicrobical activity of silver in orthoshield Safe‐T‐Tie® ligatures used in orthodontic patients. European Journal of Inflammation, 10, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, F. , Liu, C. , & Mao, Y. (2010). Bismuth‐doped injectable calcium phosphate cement with improved radiopacity and potent antimicrobial activity for root canal filling. Acta Biomaterialia, 6, 3199–3207. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciobanu, G. , & Harja, M. (2019). Bismuth‐doped nanohydroxyapatite coatings on titanium implants for improved radiopacity and antimicrobial activity. Nanomaterials, 9, 1696. 10.3390/nano9121696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Crouch, S. P. M. , Kozlowski, R. , Slater, K. J. , & Fletcher, J. (1993). The use of ATP bioluminescence as a measure of cell proliferation and cytotoxicity. Journal of Immunological Methods, 160, 81–88. 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90011-u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cushing, B. L. , Kolesnichenko, V. L. , & O'Connor, C. J. (2004). Recent advances in the liquid‐phase syntheses of inorganic nanoparticles. Chemical Reviews, 104, 3893–3946. 10.1021/cr030027b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dai, X. , Deng, Z. , Liang, Y. , Chen, L. , Jiang, W. , & Zhao, W. (2020). Enterococcus Faecalis Induces Necroptosis in Human Osteoblastic MG63 Cells through the RIPK3/MLKL Signalling Pathway. International Endodontic Journal, 53, 1204–1215. 10.1111/iej.13323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. D'Ercole, S. , Cellini, L. , Pilato, S. , Di Lodovico, S. , Iezzi, G. , Piattelli, A. , & Petrini, M. (2020). Material characterization and streptococcus oralis adhesion on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium surfaces used in implantology. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 31, 84. 10.1007/s10856-020-06408-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dexter, S. J. , Cámara, M. , Davies, M. , & Shakesheff, K. M. (2003). Development of a bioluminescent ATP assay to quantify mammalian and bacterial cell number from a mixed population. Biomaterials, 24, 27–34. 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00239-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eckhardt, S. , Brunetto, P. S. , Gagnon, J. , Priebe, M. , Giese, B. , & Fromm, K. M. (2013). Nanobio silver: Its interactions with peptides and bacteria, and its uses in medicine. Chemical Reviews, 113, 4708–4754. 10.1021/cr300288v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Enaia, M. , Bock, N. , & Ruf, S. (2011). White‐spot lesions during multibracket appliance treatment: A challenge for clinical excellence. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140, e17–e24. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ev, L. D. , Poloni, J. F. , Damé‐Teixeira, N. , Arthur, R. A. , Corralo, D. J. , Henz, S. L. , Do, T. , Maltz, M. , & Parolo, C. C. F. (2023). Biofilm dysbiosis and caries activity: A surface or an individual issue. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 31, e20230214. 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Feng, Q. L. , Wu, J. , Chen, G. Q. , Cui, F. Z. , Kim, T. N. , & Kim, J. O. (2000). A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia Coli and Staphylococcus aureus . Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 52, 662–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Forsberg, C. M. , Brattstrom, V. , Malmberg, E. , & Nord, C. E. (1991). Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: Two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and Iactobacilli. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 13, 416–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu, P. P. , Xia, Q. , Hwang, H.‐M. , Ray, P. C. , & Yu, H. (2014). Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: Generation of reactive oxygen species. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 22, 64–75. 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gastel, J. , Quirynen, M. , Teughels, W. , Pauwels, M. , Coucke, W. , & Carels, C. (2009). Microbial adhesion on different bracket types in vitro. The Angle Orthodontist, 79, 915–921. 10.2319/092908-507.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Geiger, A. M. , Gorelick, L. , Gwinnett, A. J. , & Benson, B. J. (1992). Reducing white spot lesions in orthodontic populations with fluoride rinsing. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 101, 403–407. 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70112-N [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Geiger, A. M. , Gorelick, L. , Gwinnett, A. J. , & Griswold, P. G. (1988). The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 93, 29–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gorelick, L. , Geiger, A. M. , & Gwinnett, A. J. (1982). Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. American Journal of Orthodontics, 81, 93–98. 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gosau, M. , Haupt, M. , Thude, S. , Strowitzki, M. , Schminke, B. , & Buergers, R. (2015). Antimicrobial effect and biocompatibility of novel metallic nanocrystalline implant coatings. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 104, 1571–1579. 10.1002/jbm.b.33376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gwinnett, A. J. , & Ceen, R. F. (1979). Plaque distribution on bonded brackets: A scanning microscope study. American Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 667–677. 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90098-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hadler‐Olsen, S. , Sandvik, K. , El‐Agroudi, M. A. , & Ogaard, B. (2012). The incidence of caries and white spot lesions in orthodontically treated adolescents with a comprehensive caries prophylactic regimen—A prospective study. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 34, 633–639. 10.1093/ejo/cjr068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hahnel, S. , Rosentritt, M. , Handel, G. , & Bürgers, R. (2008). In vitro evaluation of artificial ageing on surface properties and early Candida albicans adhesion to prosthetic resins. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 20, 249–255. 10.1007/s10856-008-3570-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamada, S. , & Slade, H. D. (1980). Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans . Microbiological Reviews, 44, 331–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Harvey, W. J. , & Powell, K. R. (1981). Care of dental enamel for the orthodontic patient. Australasian Orthodontic Journal, 7, 70–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hotta, M. , Nakajima, H. , Yamamoto, K. , & Aono, M. (1998). Antibacterial temporary filling materials: The effect of adding various ratios of Ag‐Zn‐Zeolite. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 25, 485–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jeon, D.‐M. , An, J.‐S. , Lim, B.‐S. , & Ahn, S.‐J. (2020). Orthodontic bonding procedures significantly influence biofilm composition. Progress in Orthodontics, 21, 14. 10.1186/s40510-020-00314-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Johansson, I. , Witkowska, E. , Kaveh, B. , Lif Holgerson, P. , & Tanner, A. C. R. (2016). The microbiome in populations with a low and high prevalence of caries. Journal of Dental Research, 95, 80–86. 10.1177/0022034515609554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahharova, D. , Pappalardo, V. Y. , Buijs, M. J. , de Menezes, R. X. , Peters, M. , Jackson, R. , Hara, A. T. , Eckert, G. , Katz, B. , Keels, M. A. , Levy, S. M. , Zaura, E. , Brandt, B. W. , & Fontana, M. (2023). Microbial indicators of dental health, dysbiosis, and early childhood caries. Journal of Dental Research, 102, 759–766. 10.1177/00220345231160756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim, Y.‐J. , Lee, D.‐Y. , Lee, J.‐Y. , & Lim, Y.‐K. (2012). The effect of silver ion‐releasing elastomers on mutans streptococci in dental plaque. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 42, 87–93. 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.2.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kolenbrander, P. E. , Palmer, R. J. , Periasamy, S. , & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010). Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8, 471–480. 10.1038/nrmicro2381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kylián, O. , Shelemin, A. , Solař, P. , Pleskunov, P. , Nikitin, D. , Kuzminova, A. , Štefaníková, R. , Kúš, P. , Cieslar, M. , Hanuš, J. , Choukourov, A. , & Biederman, H. (2019). Magnetron sputtering of polymeric targets: From thin films to heterogeneous metal/plasma polymer nanoparticles. Materials, 12, 2366. 10.3390/ma12152366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee, J. H. , Khang, G. , Lee, J. W. , & Lee, H. B. (1998). Interaction of different types of cells on polymer surfaces with wettability gradient. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 205, 323–330. 10.1006/jcis.1998.5688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Legéňová, K. , & Bujdáková, H. (2015). [The role of Streptococcus mutans in the oral biofilm]. Epidemiologie, Mikrobiologie, Imunologie, 64, 179–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lin, D.‐J. , Tsai, M.‐T. , Shieh, T.‐M. , Huang, H.‐L. , Hsu, J.‐T. , Ko, Y.‐C. , & Fuh, L.‐J. (2013). In vitro antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility of bismuth doped micro‐arc oxidized titanium. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 27, 553–563. 10.1177/0885328211414942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Loesche, W. J. (1986). Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiological Reviews, 50, 353–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lok, C.‐N. , Ho, C.‐M. , Chen, R. , He, Q.‐Y. , Yu, W.‐Y. , Sun, H. , Tam, P. K.‐H. , Chiu, J.‐F. , & Che, C.‐M. (2006). Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. Journal of Proteome Research, 5, 916–924. 10.1021/pr0504079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lovrov, S. , Hertrich, K. , & Hirschfelder, U. (2007). Enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment—Incidence and correlation to various oral‐hygiene parameters. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 68, 353–363. 10.1007/s00056-007-0714-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lundstrom, F. , & Krasse, B. (1987). Caries incidence in orthodontic patients with high levels of Streptococcus mutans . The European Journal of Orthodontics, 9, 117–121. 10.1093/ejo/9.2.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Magno, A. F. F. , Enoki, C. , Ito, I. Y. , Matsumoto, M. A. N. , Faria, G. , & Nelson‐Filho, P. (2008). In‐vivo evaluation of the contamination of super slick elastomeric rings by Streptococcus mutans in orthodontic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 133, S104–S109. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mandracci, P. , Mussano, F. , Ceruti, P. , Pirri, C. F. , & Carossa, S. (2015). Reduction of bacterial adhesion on dental composite resins by silicon‐oxygen thin film coatings. Biomedical Materials, 10, 015017. 10.1088/1748-6041/10/1/015017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Miśkiewicz, P. , Frydrych, I. , Tokarska, M. , & Pawlak, W. (2019). Study on some thermal and electrical properties of basalt fabric modified with metal and ceramics as a result of magnetron sputtering. Polymers, 11, 2087. 10.3390/polym11122087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Miura, K. K. , Ito, I. Y. , Enoki, C. , Elias, A. M. , & Matsumoto, M. A. N. (2007). Anticariogenic effect of fluoride‐releasing elastomers in orthodontic patients. Brazilian Oral Research, 21, 228–233. 10.1590/S1806-83242007000300007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Morones, J. R. , Elechiguerra, J. L. , Camacho, A. , Holt, K. , Kouri, J. B. , Ramírez, J. T. , & Yacaman, M. J. (2005). The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, 16, 2346–2353. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ogaard, B. , Rølla, G. , & Arends, J. (1988). Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. lesion development. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 94, 68–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. O'Reilly, M. M. , & Featherstone, J. D. B. (1987). Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 92, 33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Owens, D. K. , & Wendt, R. C. (1969). Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 13, 1741–1747. 10.1002/app.1969.070130815 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Papaioannou, W. , Gizani, S. , Nassika, M. , Kontou, E. , & Nakou, M. (2007). Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to different types of brackets. The Angle Orthodontist, 77, 1090–1095. 10.2319/091706-375.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pellegrini, P. , Sauerwein, R. , Finlayson, T. , McLeod, J. , Covell, D. A. , Maier, T. , & Machida, C. A. (2009). Plaque retention by self‐ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate‐driven bioluminescence. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 135, 426.e1–426.e9. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pérez‐Díaz, M. A. , Boegli, L. , James, G. , Velasquillo, C. , Sánchez‐Sánchez, R. , Martínez‐Martínez, R.‐E. , Martínez‐Castañón, G. A. , & Martinez‐Gutierrez, F. (2015). Silver nanoparticles with antimicrobial activities against Streptococcus mutans and their cytotoxic effect. Materials Science and Engineering, 55, 360–366. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.05.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pitts, N. B. , Twetman, S. , Fisher, J. , & Marsh, P. D. (2021). Understanding dental caries as a non‐communicable disease. British Dental Journal, 231, 749–753. 10.1038/s41415-021-3775-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Quirynen, M. , Bollen, C. M. , Papaioannou, W. , Van Eldere, J. , & van Steenberghe, D. (1996). The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: Short‐term observations. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 11, 169–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Quirynen, M. , Van Der Mei, H. C. , Bollen, C. M. L. , Schotte, A. , Marechal, M. , Doornbusch, G. I. , Naert, I. , Busscher, H. J. , & Van Steenberghe, D. (1993). An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra‐ and subgingival plaque. Journal of Dental Research, 72, 1304–1309. 10.1177/00220345930720090801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Richter, A. E. , Arruda, A. O. , Peters, M. C. , & Sohn, W. (2011). Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139, 657–664. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rosenbloom, R. G. , & Tinanoff, N. (1991). Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 100, 35–37. 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70046-Y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rtimi, S. , Giannakis, S. , & Pulgarin, C. (2017). Self‐sterilizing sputtered films for applications in hospital facilities. Molecules, 22, 1074. 10.3390/molecules22071074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Scheuerman, T. R. , Camper, A. K. , & Hamilton, M. A. (1998). Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 208, 23–33. 10.1006/jcis.1998.5717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Schubert, A. , Bürgers, R. , Baum, F. , Kurbad, O. , & Wassmann, T. (2021). Influence of the manufacturing method on the adhesion of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans to oral splint resins. Polymers, 13, 1534. 10.3390/polym13101534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Składanowski, M. , Golinska, P. , Rudnicka, K. , Dahm, H. , & Rai, M. (2016). Evaluation of cytotoxicity, immune compatibility and antibacterial activity of biogenic silver nanoparticles. Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 205, 603–613. 10.1007/s00430-016-0477-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Srivastava, K. , Tikku, T. , Khanna, R. , & Sachan, K. (2013). Risk factors and management of white spot lesions in orthodontics. Journal of Orthodontic Science, 2, 43–49. 10.4103/2278-0203.115081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sundararaj, D. , Venkatachalapathy, S. , Tandon, A. , & Pereira, A. (2015). Critical evaluation of incidence and prevalence of white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment: A meta‐analysis. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, 5, 433–439. 10.4103/2231-0762.167719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tan, X.‐Q. , Liu, J.‐Y. , Niu, J.‐R. , Liu, J.‐Y. , & Tian, J.‐Y. (2018). Recent progress in magnetron sputtering technology used on fabrics. Materials, 11, 1953. 10.3390/ma11101953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Teughels, W. , Van Assche, N. , Sliepen, I. , & Quirynen, M. (2006). Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17(suppl. 2), 68–81. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Tufekci, E. , Dixon, J. S. , Gunsolley, J. C. , & Lindauer, S. J. (2011). Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. The Angle Orthodontist, 81, 206–210. 10.2319/051710-262.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Verran, J. , Sandoval, G. , Allen, N. S. , Edge, M. , & Stratton, J. (2007). Variables affecting the antibacterial properties of nano and pigmentary titania particles in suspension. Dyes and Pigments, 73, 298–304. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.01.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang, C. , van der Mei, H. C. , Busscher, H. J. , & Ren, Y. (2020). Streptococcus mutans adhesion force sensing in multi‐species oral biofilms. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes, 6, 25. 10.1038/s41522-020-0135-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wasa, K. , Kanno, I. , & Kotera, H. (2012). Handbook of sputter deposition technology: Fundamentals and applications for functional thin films, nano‐materials and MEMS (2nd ed.). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wassmann, T. , Kreis, S. , Behr, M. , & Buergers, R. (2017). The influence of surface texture and wettability on initial bacterial adhesion on titanium and zirconium oxide dental implants. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 3, 32. 10.1186/s40729-017-0093-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wassmann, T. , Schubert, A. , Malinski, F. , Rosentritt, M. , Krohn, S. , Techmer, K. , & Bürgers, R. (2020). The antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of a copper‐loaded zinc oxide phosphate cement. Clinical Oral Investigations, 24, 3899–3909. 10.1007/s00784-020-03257-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wilson, T. G. , & Gregory, R. L. (1995). Clinical effectiveness of Fluoride‐Releasing elastomers. I: Salivary Streptococcus mutans numbers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 107, 293–297. 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70145-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Yamamoto, K. , Ohashi, S. , Aono, M. , Kokubo, T. , Yamada, I. , & Yamauchi, J. (1996). Antibacterial activity of silver ions implanted in SiO2 filler on oral streptococci. Dental Materials, 12, 227–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yang, K. , Xu, S. , Zhao, H. , Liu, L. , Lv, X. , Hu, F. , Wang, L. , & Ji, Q. (2021). Hypoxia and porphyromonas gingivalis‐lipopolysaccharide synergistically induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human gingival fibroblasts. International Immunopharmacology, 94, 107456. 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Yoda, I. , Koseki, H. , Tomita, M. , Shida, T. , Horiuchi, H. , Sakoda, H. , & Osaki, M. (2014). Effect of surface roughness of biomaterials on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion. BMC Microbiology, 14, 234. 10.1186/s12866-014-0234-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yoshida, K. , Tanagawa, M. , Matsumoto, S. , Yamada, T. , & Atsuta, M. (1999). Antibacterial activity of resin composites with silver‐containing materials. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 107, 290–296. 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107409.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang, T. , Wang, L. , Chen, Q. , & Chen, C. (2014). Cytotoxic potential of silver nanoparticles. Yonsei Medical Journal, 55, 283–291. 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhao, Q. , Wang, S. , & Müller‐Steinhagen, H. (2004). Tailored surface free energy of membrane diffusers to minimize microbial adhesion. Applied Surface Science, 230, 371–378. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.02.052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zheng, H. , Xie, T. , Li, S. , Qiao, X. , Lu, Y. , & Feng, Y. (2021). Analysis of oral microbial dysbiosis associated with early childhood caries. BMC Oral Health, 21, 181. 10.1186/s12903-021-01543-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this publication are openly available in the data repository “Göttingen Research Online” (https://doi.org/10.25625/DOSOZ9).


Articles from Clinical and Experimental Dental Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES