Skip to main content
Plant Biotechnology logoLink to Plant Biotechnology
. 2023 Mar 25;40(1):93–98. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.22.1219a

Histone chaperone NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1 proteins affect plant growth under nitrogen deficient conditions in Arabidopsis thaliana

Linnan Jie 1, Miho Sanagi 2, Yongming Luo 2, Haruna Maeda 1, Yoichiro Fukao 3, Yukako Chiba 2, Shuichi Yanagisawa 4, Junji Yamaguchi 2, Junpei Takagi 2, Takeo Sato 2,*
PMCID: PMC10910346  PMID: 38439935

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) availability is one of the most important factors regulating plant metabolism and growth as it affects global gene expression profiles. Dynamic changes in chromatin structure, including histone modifications and nucleosome assembly/disassembly, have been extensively shown to regulate gene expression under various environmental stresses in plants. However, the involvement of chromatin related changes in plant nutrient responses has been demonstrated only in a few studies to date. In this study, we investigated the function of histone chaperone NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN1 (NAP1) proteins under N deficient conditions in Arabidopsis. In the nap1;1 nap1;2 nap1;3 triple mutant (m123-1), the expression of N-responsive marker genes and growth of lateral roots were decreased under N deficient conditions. In addition, the m123-1 plants showed a delay in N deficiency-induced leaf senescence. Taken together, these results suggest that NAP1s affect plant growth under N deficient conditions in Arabidopsis.

Keywords: Arabidopsis, gene expression, histone chaperone, nitrogen, nutrient


Nitrogen (N) availability is an essential factor for regulating plant metabolism, growth, and development (Crawford and Forde 2002; Gutiérrez 2012; Vidal et al. 2020). Plants mainly take up inorganic forms of N (nitrate and ammonium) from the soil and use them to synthesize indispensable organic compounds. In addition, nitrate is known to function as a signaling molecule, which reprograms global gene expression levels to optimize N uptake and metabolism (Bi et al. 2007; Konishi and Yanagisawa 2013; Liu et al. 2017; Marchive et al. 2013). Under N deficient conditions, plants upregulate the expression of genes encoding high affinity nitrate transporters and cytosolic glutamine synthetases, thus improving N acquisition efficiency and N utilization efficiency, respectively (Bernard and Habash 2009; Ishiyama et al. 2004; Lejay et al. 1999; Li et al. 2007; Masclaux-Daubresse et al. 2010; Zhuo et al. 1999).

Chromatin remodeling, including histone modifications and nucleosome assembly and disassembly, contributes to gene expression regulation (Klemm et al. 2019; Lai and Pugh 2017; Zaret and Mango 2016). Dynamic changes in chromatin structure have been observed in response to numerous environmental conditions (Asensi-Fabado et al. 2017; Chang et al. 2020; Chinnusamy and Zhu 2009; Lämke and Bäurle 2017). Post-translational modifications of histones not only affect chromatin structure but also lead to the recruitment of remodeling enzymes, which can regulate gene transcription (Bannister and Kouzarides 2011; Swygert and Peterson 2014). In mammals and plants, histone H3 can be mono-, di-, tri-methylated at specific lysine residues, which are associated with transcriptional activation (H3K4 and H3K36) or repression (H3K27 and H3K9) (Berr et al. 2011; Black et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2010; Martin and Zhang 2005; Xiao et al. 2016). Recently, several studies showed that histone modifications participate in nutrient acquisition in environmental conditions by regulating the changes in gene expression (Secco et al. 2017; Séré and Martin 2020). In Arabidopsis, expression of the high affinity nitrate transporter gene NITRATE TRANSPORTER 2.1 (NRT2.1) is upregulated at the onset of N deficiency (Filleur and Daniel-Vedele 1999; Lejay et al. 1999). A previous study identified HIGH NITROGEN-INSENSITIVE 9 (HNI9) as a key regulator of histone modification at the NRT2.1 locus (Widiez et al. 2011). HNI9 encodes Arabidopsis INTERACT WITH SPT6 (AtIWS1), an evolutionary conserved component of the RNA polymerase II complex, which represses NRT2.1 expression in roots under high N conditions by modulating H3K27me3 level at the NRT2.1 locus (Widiez et al. 2011).

Nucleosome assembly and disassembly also play important roles in chromatin remodeling. The NUCLESOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1 (NAP1) family of proteins act as primary chaperones of histones H2A and H2B, which are highly conserved among eukaryotes. NAP1 proteins bind to and shuttle histones into the nucleus, facilitating nucleosome assembly (Hammond et al. 2017; Park and Luger 2006; Zhou et al. 2015). The Arabidopsis genome harbors four genes encoding NAP1 proteins (NAP1;1 to NAP1;4) and two genes encoding NAP1-RELATED PROTEINS (NRPs) (NRP1 and NRP2) (Galichet and Gruissem 2006; Zhu et al. 2006). In Arabidopsis, NAP1 proteins play a redundant role in the response to different abiotic stresses, such as DNA damage and salt stress (Liu et al. 2009a, 2009b), and facilitate plant adaptation to phosphate starvation (Iglesias et al. 2013). The NAP1;1-NAP1;3 triple mutant plants exhibit lower expression levels of Pi starvation-induced genes, and consequently lower Pi accumulation, than wild-type Arabidopsis plants (Iglesias et al. 2013).

These studies indicate that chromatin remodeling plays an essential role in regulating plant responses to changes in environmental conditions including nutrient availability. However, the detailed mechanism of chromatin remodeling-mediated plant responses to N availability remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the functions of Arabidopsis NAP1 proteins under N deficient conditions.

To investigate the functions of NAP1s under N deficient conditions in Arabidopsis, we first examined the expression patterns of several N-responsive genes in triple loss-of-function mutant of NAP1;1-NAP1;3 m123-1 (Liu et al. 2009a) under different N contents. Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) and m123-1 mutant were surface-sterilized and were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 100 mM glucose and different N concentrations under long-day (16 h light/8 h dark) photoperiod after dark incubation for two days at 4°C. Total RNA was isolated from 8-day-old whole wild-type (WT; Col-0) and m123-1 mutant seedlings grown on control N (30 mM N; 10 mM NH4NO3 and 10 mM KNO3) and low N (0.3 mM N; 0.1 mM NH4NO3 and 0.1 mM KNO3) media for 24 h before harvesting. Then, cDNA was synthesized as described previously (Sanagi et al. 2021), and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on the Mx3000P QPCR System (Agilent Technologies) using gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) and TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression levels of NRT2.1 and the cytosolic glutamine synthetase-encoding gene GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE 1;4 (GLN1;4) were upregulated in WT plants under low N conditions compared to control N conditions (Figure 1). The expression levels of these genes were reduced in m123-1 plants compared to that in WT under low N conditions (Figure 1). The expression levels of NRT2.1 and GLN1;4 tend to be decreased in m123-1 plants compared to that in WT even in control N conditions although the differences were not statistically significant (Figure 1). We also analyzed the expression levels of the plastid-located glutamine synthetase-encoding gene GLUTAMINE SYNTHETASE (GS2) and NITRATE REDUCTASE 1 (NIA1), both of which are reportedly downregulated under low N conditions (Konishi and Yanagisawa 2011; Taira et al. 2004). Our results showed that expression levels of both GS2 and NIA1 were decreased to similar levels in m123-1 and WT plants under low N conditions (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Expression levels of nitrogen (N)-responsive marker genes in wild-type (WT) and nap1;1 nap1;2 nap1;3 triple mutant (m123-1) plants. Plants were grown on control (30 mM) N medium for 7 days and then on control (30 mM) or low (0.3 mM) N medium for 1 day. Expression levels of genes were first normalized relative to that of the 18S rRNA gene and then relative to the expression level in WT plants grown on control (30 mM) N medium. Results represent the mean±standard deviation (SD; n=4 biological replicates). Different letters indicate significant differences detected by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (p<0.05).

Figure 1. Expression levels of nitrogen (N)-responsive marker genes in wild-type (WT) and nap1;1 nap1;2 nap1;3 triple mutant (m123-1) plants. Plants were grown on control (30 mM) N medium for 7 days and then on control (30 mM) or low (0.3 mM) N medium for 1 day. Expression levels of genes were first normalized relative to that of the 18S rRNA gene and then relative to the expression level in WT plants grown on control (30 mM) N medium. Results represent the mean±standard deviation (SD; n=4 biological replicates). Different letters indicate significant differences detected by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (p<0.05).

N availability affects plant root architecture to optimize N acquisition efficiency (Kiba and Krapp 2016; López-Bucio et al. 2003). Additionally, in Arabidopsis, lateral root growth is promoted under N deficient conditions (Gruber et al. 2013). To further evaluate the function of NAP1 proteins under N deficient conditions, we analyzed the root growth phenotypes of WT and m123-1 seedlings grown first on control (30 mM) N medium for 6 days and then grown on control (30 mM) or low (0.3 mM) N medium for 4 days. The primary root length of WT plants was similar under both N conditions, but lateral root elongation was more promoted under the low N condition than under the control condition (Figure 2). Compared with the WT, m123-1 plants showed shorter primary root on both control and low N media (Figure 2A, B). Low N-induced lateral root elongation was significantly repressed in m123-1 plants (Figure 2A, C). The lateral root was shorter in m123-1 plants compared to that in WT even in control N conditions (Figure 2A, C). These results suggest that NAP1s are involved in root development and are required for the promotion of lateral root growth under N deficient conditions.

Figure 2. Root growth phenotype of WT and m123-1 mutant seedlings grown on different N media. (A) Plants were grown on control (30 mM) N medium for 6 days and then transferred to 30 mM or 0.3 mM N-containing medium. Photographs were taken 4 days after transfer, and root length was measured. Scale bar=1 cm. (B and C) Primary root length (B) and average lateral root length (C) of seedlings depicted in (A). Results represent mean±SD (n=8). Different letters indicate significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test; p<0.05).

Figure 2. Root growth phenotype of WT and m123-1 mutant seedlings grown on different N media. (A) Plants were grown on control (30 mM) N medium for 6 days and then transferred to 30 mM or 0.3 mM N-containing medium. Photographs were taken 4 days after transfer, and root length was measured. Scale bar=1 cm. (B and C) Primary root length (B) and average lateral root length (C) of seedlings depicted in (A). Results represent mean±SD (n=8). Different letters indicate significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test; p<0.05).

In addition, we monitored the progression of the N deficiency-induced leaf senescence in m123-1 plants. Under N deficient conditions, photosynthesis was downregulated, while nutrient recycling and remobilization were upregulated, resulting in the induction of leaf senescence (Avila-Ospina et al. 2014; Diaz et al. 2008). Since reduction in chlorophyll content is a typical marker of leaf senescence, we measured the chlorophyll content of the leaves of WT and m123-1 seedlings grown first on control (30 mM) N medium for 10 days and then on control (30 mM) or low (0.3 mM) N medium for 11 days. The leaves were harvested, frozen, and homogenized in 80% acetone to extract chlorophyll, which was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 663.6, 646.6, and 750 nm using a spectrophotometer (Aoyama et al. 2014). The total chlorophyll content was calculated from the sum of the content of chlorophyll a (Chl a) and chlorophyll b (Chl b) estimated by the following equations:

graphic file with name plantbiotechnology-40-1-22.1219a-math01.jpg

where A663.6, A646.6, and A750 represent the absorbance at 663.6, 646.6, and 750 nm, respectively.

Leaves of WT plants showed yellowing and a significant reduction in chlorophyll contents under low N conditions compared with the control condition (Figure 3), as expected. By contrast, leaves of m123-1 plants exhibited delayed yellowing and contained more chlorophyll than WT plants (Figure 3). These results suggest that NAP1s are involved in the progression of leaf senescence under N deficient conditions.

Figure 3. Leaf senescence phenotype of WT and m123-1 mutant seedlings grown on different N media. (A) Photographs of plants grown on control (30 mM) N medium for 10 days and then on 30 mM or 0.3 mM N-containing medium for 11 days. (B) Total chlorophyll contents of plants shown in (A). Scale bar=1 cm. Results represent mean±SD (n=12). Different letters indicate significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test; p<0.05).

Figure 3. Leaf senescence phenotype of WT and m123-1 mutant seedlings grown on different N media. (A) Photographs of plants grown on control (30 mM) N medium for 10 days and then on 30 mM or 0.3 mM N-containing medium for 11 days. (B) Total chlorophyll contents of plants shown in (A). Scale bar=1 cm. Results represent mean±SD (n=12). Different letters indicate significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test; p<0.05).

Taken together, this study suggests that NAP1 proteins affect gene expression and plants growth under N deficient conditions in Arabidopsis. Note that NAP1s might be involved in regulating N transport and metabolism as well as root growth not only under N deficient condition but also control N conditions. Because NAP1 proteins are histone chaperones, it is expected that these proteins affect the expression levels of N-responsive genes via alterations of the nucleosome architecture to optimize the plants growth under N deficient conditions. Further investigation of the biochemical properties of NAP1 proteins and the identification of their target genes will provide new insights into the chromatin remodeling mechanisms employed by plants under N deficiency.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Aiwu Dong (Fudan University) and Wen-Hui Shen (Fudan University) for kindly providing the m123-1 mutant seeds. We also thank Yoshie Morita for helping with gene expression analysis. This work was supported by the MEXT KAKENHI (Grant Nos. JP21H02150 to J.Y., JP20K05949 and JP21H05644 to T.S.) and Hokkaido University (Hokkaido University Young Scientist Support Program to M.S. and T.S.). L.J. was supported by China Scholarship Council (201906350019). M.S. and Y.L. were supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellowship for Young Scientists.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contribution

L.J. and T.S. designed the experiments. L.J., M.S., Y.L., H.M. and Y.F. performed the experiments. L.J., M.S., H.M., J.T. and T.S. analyzed the data. L.J. and T.S. wrote the article, and M.S., Y.F., Y.C., S.Y., J.Y. and J.T. edited it. All the authors approved the manuscript.

Description of Supplementary Files

Supplementary Table S1. Primers used in this study.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data

References

  1. Aoyama S, Huarancca Reyes T, Guglielminetti L, Lu Y, Morita Y, Sato T, Yamaguchi J (2014) Ubiquitin ligase ATL31 functions in leaf senescence in response to the balance between atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen availability in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 55: 293–305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asensi-Fabado MA, Amtmann A, Perrella G (2017) Plant responses to abiotic stress: The chromatin context of transcriptional regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1860: 106–122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avila-Ospina L, Moison M, Yoshimoto K, Masclaux-Daubresse C (2014) Autophagy, plant senescence, and nutrient recycling. J Exp Bot 65: 3799–3811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T (2011) Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res 21: 381–395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernard SM, Habash DZ (2009) The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling. New Phytol 182: 608–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berr A, Shafiq S, Shen WH (2011) Histone modifications in transcriptional activation during plant development. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1809: 567–576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bi YM, Wang RL, Zhu T, Rothstein SJ (2007) Global transcription profiling reveals differential responses to chronic nitrogen stress and putative nitrogen regulatory components in Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics 8: 281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Black JC, Rechem CV, Whetstine JR (2012) Histone lysine methylation dynamics: Establishment, regulation, and biological impact. Mol Cell 48: 491–507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang YN, Zhu C, Jiang J, Zhang H, Zhu JK, Duan CG (2020) Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses. J Integr Plant Biol 62: 563–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK (2009) Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12: 133–139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crawford NM, Forde BG (2002) Molecular and developmental biology of inorganic nitrogen nutrition. Arabidopsis Book 1: e0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Diaz C, Lemaître T, Christ A, Azzopardi M, Kato Y, Sato F, Morot-Gaudry JF, Le Dily F, Masclaux-Daubresse C (2008) Nitrogen recycling and remobilization are differentially controlled by leaf senescence and development stage in Arabidopsis under low nitrogen nutrition. Plant Physiol 147: 1437–1449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Filleur S, Daniel-Vedele F (1999) Expression analysis of a high-affinity nitrate transporter isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana by differential display. Planta 207: 461–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Galichet A, Gruissem W (2006) Developmentally controlled farnesylation modulates AtNAP1; 1 function in cell proliferation and cell expansion during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Physiol 142: 1412–1426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gruber BD, Giehl RFH, Friedel S, von Wirén N (2013) Plasticity of the Arabidopsis root system under nutrient deficiencies. Plant Physiol 163: 161–179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutiérrez RA (2012) Systems biology for enhanced plant nitrogen nutrition. Science 336: 1673–1675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hammond CM, Strømme CB, Huang H, Patel DJ, Groth A (2017) Histone chaperone networks shaping chromatin function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18: 141–158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iglesias J, Trigueros M, Rojas-Triana M, Fernández M, Albar JP, Bustos R, Paz-Ares J, Rubio V (2013) Proteomics identifies ubiquitin-proteasome targets and new roles for chromatin-remodeling in the Arabidopsis response to phosphate starvation. J Proteomics 94: 1–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ishiyama K, Inoue E, Watanabe-Takahashi A, Obara M, Yamaya T, Takahashi H (2004) Kinetic properties and ammonium-dependent regulation of cytosolic isoenzymes of glutamine synthetase in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 279: 16598–16605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kiba T, Krapp A (2016) Plant nitrogen acquisition under low availability: Regulation of uptake and root architecture. Plant Cell Physiol 57: 707–714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Klemm SL, Shipony Z, Greenleaf WJ (2019) Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat Rev Genet 20: 207–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Konishi M, Yanagisawa S (2011) The regulatory region controlling the nitrate-responsive expression of a nitrate reductase gene, NIA1, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 52: 824–836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Konishi M, Yanagisawa S (2013) Arabidopsis NIN-like transcription factors have a central role in nitrate signalling. Nat Commun 4: 1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lai WKM, Pugh BF (2017) Understanding nucleosome dynamics and their links to gene expression and DNA replication. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18: 548–562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lämke J, Bäurle I (2017) Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biol 18: 124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lejay L, Tillard P, Lepetit M, Olive FD, Filleur S, Daniel-Vedele F, Gojon A (1999) Molecular and functional regulation of two NO3− uptake systems by N- and C-status of Arabidopsis plants. Plant J 18: 509–519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li W, Wang Y, Okamoto M, Crawford NM, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM (2007) Dissection of the AtNRT2.1:AtNRT2.2 inducible high-affinity nitrate transporter gene cluster. Plant Physiol 143: 425–433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu C, Lu F, Cui X, Cao X (2010) Histone methylation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 395–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu KH, Niu Y, Konishi M, Wu Y, Du H, Chung SH, Li L, Boudsocq M, McCormack M, Maekawa S, et al. (2017) Discovery of nitrate-CPK-NLP signalling in central nutrient-growth networks. Nature 545: 311–316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu Z, Zhu Y, Gao J, Yu F, Dong A, Shen WH (2009a) Molecular and reverse genetic characterization of NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN1 (NAP1) genes unravels their function in transcription and nucleotide excision repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 59: 27–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu ZQ, Gao J, Dong AW, Shen WH (2009b) A truncated Arabidopsis NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1, ATNAP1;3T, alters plant growth responses to abscisic acid and salt in the Atnap1;3-2 mutant. Mol Plant 2: 688–699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. López-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramírez A, Herrera-Estrella L (2003) The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 280–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marchive C, Roudier F, Castaings L, Bréhaut V, Blondet E, Colot V, Meyer C, Krapp A (2013) Nuclear retention of the transcription factor NLP7 orchestrates the early response to nitrate in plants. Nat Commun 4: 1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin C, Zhang Y (2005) The diverse functions of histone lysine methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 838–849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Masclaux-Daubresse C, Daniel-Vedele F, Dechorgnat J, Chardon F, Gaufichon L, Suzuki A (2010) Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: Challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann Bot 105: 1141–1157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Park YJ, Luger K (2006) The structure of nucleosome assembly protein 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 1248–1253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanagi M, Aoyama S, Kubo A, Lu Y, Sato Y, Ito S, Abe M, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M, Kiba T, et al. (2021) Low nitrogen conditions accelerate flowering by modulating the phosphorylation state of FLOWERING BHLH 4 in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118: e2022942118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Secco D, Whelan J, Rouached H, Lister R (2017) Nutrient stress-induced chromatin changes in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 39: 1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Séré D, Martin A (2020) Epigenetic regulation: Another layer in plant nutrition. Plant Signal Behav 15: 1686236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Swygert SG, Peterson CL (2014) Chromatin dynamics: Interplay between remodeling enzymes and histone modifications. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1839: 728–736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Taira M, Valtersson U, Burkhardt B, Ludwig RA (2004) Arabidopsis thaliana GLN2-encoded glutamine synthetase is dual targeted to leaf mitochondria and chloroplasts. Plant Cell 16: 2048–2058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vidal EA, Alvarez JM, Araus V, Riveras E, Brooks MD, Krouk G, Ruffel S, Lejay L, Crawford NM, Coruzzi GM, et al. (2020) Nitrate in 2020: Thirty years from transport to signaling networks. Plant Cell 32: 2094–2119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Widiez T, El-Kafafi ES, Girin T, Berr A, Ruffel S, Krouk G, Vayssières A, Shen WH, Coruzzi GM, Gojon A, et al. (2011) HIGH NITROGEN INSENSITIVE 9 (HNI9)-mediated systemic repression of root NO3− uptake is associated with changes in histone methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 13329–13334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xiao J, Lee US, Wagner D (2016) Tug of war: Adding and removing histone lysine methylation in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 34: 41–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zaret KS, Mango SE (2016) Pioneer transcription factors, chromatin dynamics, and cell fate control. Curr Opin Genet Dev 37: 76–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhou W, Zhu Y, Dong A, Shen WH (2015) Histone H2A/H2B chaperones: From molecules to chromatin-based functions in plant growth and development. Plant J 83: 78–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhu Y, Dong A, Meyer D, Pichon O, Renou JP, Cao K, Shen WH (2006) Arabidopsis NRP1 and NRP2 encode histone chaperones and are required for maintaining postembryonic root growth. Plant Cell 18: 2879–2892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhuo D, Okamoto M, Vidmar JJ, Glass ADM (1999) Regulation of a putative high-affinity nitrate transporter (Nrt2;1At) in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 17: 563–568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Plant Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Plant Biotechnology

RESOURCES