Ozanimod is a selective modulator of the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor. The drug is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and has demonstrated a favorable safety profile in UC as well as in multiple sclerosis.1 The phase 3 True North study evaluated ozanimod vs placebo in patients with moderately to severely active UC.2 The study included a 10-week induction phase, a 42-week maintenance phase, and a 94-week open-label extension (OLE) study. For induction, 645 patients in cohort 1 were randomized 2:1 to receive placebo or ozanimod (0.92 mg, daily), while 367 patients in cohort 2 received open-label ozanimod (0.92 mg, daily). At week 10, patients in the placebo arm who exhibited a response continued with placebo (n=69). Responding patients in either cohort 1 or cohort 2 who received induction treatment with ozanimod were evenly randomized to receive placebo (n=227) or continue with ozanimod (n=230). The OLE study included patients who did not respond to induction, patients who lost a response in the maintenance phase, and patients who completed the maintenance phase.
In comparison with placebo, ozanimod demonstrated efficacy in both the induction and maintenance phases of the True North study. At week 10, ozanimod was superior to placebo in respect to clinical remission (18.4% vs 6.0%), clinical response (47.8% vs 25.9%), endoscopic improvement (27.3% vs 11.6%), and mucosal healing (12.6% vs 3.7%). Similarly, at week 52, outcomes were superior with ozanimod vs placebo, including clinical remission (37.0% vs 18.5%), clinical response (60.0% vs 41.0%), endoscopic improvement (45.7% vs 26.4%), mucosal healing (29.6% vs 14.1%), and others. Prior analyses of data from the True North OLE have shown a favorable safety profile in 131 patients with UC treated with ozanimod for up to 146 weeks.3
An interim analysis evaluated the cumulative long-term safety of ozanimod in all patients who entered the True North OLE study.4 This group of 823 patients represented 2219 patientyears of exposure to ozanimod, with a mean duration of exposure of 2.7 ± 1.6 years per patient. Patients in this analysis had a mean age of 41.7 ± 13.6 years, and 59.3% were male. The mean age at UC diagnosis was 34.5 ± 13.3 years, and the mean time since UC diagnosis was 7.4 ± 7.0 years. At screening, 32% of the patients were using corticosteroids. The exposure-adjusted incident rate per 100 patient-years (EAIR100) was 87.6 for treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in 672 patients (81.7%), 7.4 for serious treatmentemergent AEs in 149 patients (18.1%), and 2.5 for treatment-emergent AEs leading to discontinuation of ozanimod in 55 patients (6.7%). The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included lymphopenia (EAIR100, 6.4) in 128 patients (15.6%), anemia (EAIR100, 4.2) in 86 patients (10.4%), and nasopharyngitis (EAIR100, 4.1) in 85 patients (10.3%). The most common infections included serious infection in 41 patients (5.0%; EAIR100, 1.9), nasopharyngitis in 85 patients (10.3%; EAIR100, 4.1), COVID-19 in 66 patients (8.0%; EAIR100, 3.0), and upper respiratory tract infection in 56 patients (6.8%; EAIR100, 2.7; Table 1). The most common malignancy was basal cell carcinoma (EAIR100, 0.3), followed by prostate cancer, colon adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, rectal adenocarcinoma, and rectal cancer stage II, each of which had an EAIR100 of 0.1. AEs of special interest included hypertension (EAIR100, 2.3), macular edema (EAIR100, 0.2), bradycardia (EAIR100, 0.1), and third-degree atrioventricular block (EAIR100, 0.1). The EAIR100 for opportunistic infection was 1.5. An absolute lymphocyte count below 200/mm3 was observed in 7.8% of patients in the analysis and was not associated with an increased rate of opportunistic infections.
Table 1.
The Most Frequent TEAEs for All Patients Who Entered the OLE From TN
| All TN Patients Enrolled in the OLE (N=823) | |
|---|---|
| Adverse Event | n (%) |
| TEAEs | 672 (81.7) |
| Serious TEAEs | 149 (18.1) |
| TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation | 55 (6.7) |
Most frequent TEAEs (occurring in ≥5% of patients)
|
128 (15.6) 86 (10.4) 85 (10.3) 84 (10.2) 74 (9.0) 74 (9.0) 66 (8.0) 63 (7.7) 56 (6.8) 54 (6.6) 49 (6.0) 44 (5.3) 42 (5.1) |
OLE, open-label extension; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TN, True North; UC, ulcerative colitis. Adapted from Abreu et al. Abstract 950. Presented at: DDW 2023; May 6-9, 2023; Chicago, Illinois.4
References
- Zeposia [ozanimod] prescribing information. Bristol Myers Squibb. Princeton, NJ; 2022.
- Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, D’Haens G et al. True North Study Group. Ozanimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(14):1280–1291. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2033617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danese S, Abreu MT, Wolf DC Efficacy and safety of 3 years of continuous ozanimod treatment: an interim analysis of the True North open-label extension study. Abstract DOP37. 2023. Presented at: 18th Congress of ECCO; March 1-4, Copenhagen, Denmark. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Abreu MT, Danese S, Wolf DC Long-term safety of 3 years of ozanimod in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis of the True North open-label extension. Abstract 950. 2023. Presented at: DDW 2023; May 6-9, Chicago, Illinois. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
