Abstract
Background
Continuum of care (CoC) for maternal and child health provides opportunities for mothers and children to improve their nutritional status, but many children remain undernourished in Angola. This study aimed to assess the achievement level of CoC and examine the association between the CoC achievement level and child nutritional status.
Methods
We used nationally representative data from the Angola 2015–2016 Multiple Indicator and Health Survey. Completion of CoC was defined as achieving at least four antenatal care visits (4 + ANC), delivery with a skilled birth attendant (SBA), child vaccination at birth, child postnatal check within 2 months (PNC), and a series of child vaccinations at 2, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months of child age. We included under 5 years old children who were eligible for child vaccination questionnaires and their mothers. The difference in CoC achievement level among different nutritional status were presented using the Kaplan-Meier method and examined using the Log-Lank test. Additionally, the multivariable logistic regression analysis examined the associations between child nutritional status and CoC achievement levels.
Results
The prevalence of child stunting, underweight and wasting was 48.3%, 23.2% and 5.9% respectively. The overall CoC completion level was 1.2%. The level of achieving CoC of mother-child pairs was 62.8% for 4 + ANC, 42.2% for SBA, 23.0% for child vaccination at birth, and 6.7% for PNC, and it continued to decline over 15 months. The Log-Lank test showed that there were significant differences in the CoC achievement level between children with no stunting and those with stunting (p < 0.001), those with no underweight and those with underweight (p < 0.001), those with no wasting and those with wasting (p = 0.003), and those with malnutrition and those with a normal nutritional status (p < 0.001). Achieving 4 + ANC (CoC1), 4 + ANC and SBA (CoC 2), and 4 + ANC, SBA, and child vaccination at birth (CoC 3) were associated with reduction in child stunting and underweight.
Conclusions
The completion of CoC is low in Angola and many children miss their opportunity of nutritional intervention. According to our result, improving care utilization and its continuity could improve child nutritional status.
Keywords: Child nutrition, Undernutrition, Stunting, Underweight, Maternal and child health, Continuum of care, Angola, Africa, Lower middle-income country
Background
Undernutrition affects not only health [1–9] and development [1, 10–15], but also educational attainment [16–18] and productivity [3, 6, 19], in children in the short and long term. Undernourished children are more vulnerable to infections (e.g., those that cause diarrhea and pneumonia) [5] and have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality [2, 5, 7–9]. Undernourished children are also likely to drop out from school more frequently than well-nourished children [6, 19]. Keats EC, et al. (2021) updated 10 core interventions recommended by the 2013 Lancet series [20] and they presented a new framework with 10 direct health-care sector nutritional interventions; maternal and child micronutrient supplementation, maternal and child food supplementation, support for early immediate breastfeeding initiation, delayed cord clamping, promotion and support for exclusive and continued breastfeeding, promotion of age-appropriate complementary feeding practices, management of moderate acute malnutrition, treatment of severe acute malnutrition, anemia treatment, promotion of healthy diet and physical activity during childhood and adolescence [21]. However, the use of these care is an issue, and many children remain undernourished.
In Angola, 38% of children aged younger than 5 years show stunted growth and 19% are underweight [22]. Regarding utilization of maternal and child health (MCH) services, 61% achieve a minimum of four antenatal care visits [22]. The assessment of nutrition is expected to be conducted while women and children visit a health facility for ANC, delivery, child consultations and vaccinations. However, many children miss these opportunities because the coverage of all age-appropriate vaccines in children aged 24–35 months is only 9% [22]. Utilization of health services is hampered by rural residence, a long distance from health facilities, low literacy and education background of mothers, and younger age of mothers in Angola [23]. Other factors are the experience of miscarriage [24], parity [25], women’s and/or household’s wealth [24, 26–29], women’s or parents’ education [23, 28, 30, 31], birth plan [24, 28], ethnicity [28, 30], and sex of the healthcare providers [27] as reported from African countries. However, mothers who use ANC services are more likely to re-visit to receive care [26, 27, 32]. This finding implies women’s continuous visits to MCH services increase the chance of children to receive consultations/vaccinations. Therefore, children have more opportunities to be screened for malnutrition.
Studies that have investigated the situation of continuum of care (CoC) from pregnancy to child vaccinations are limited [33], although an improvement in CoC has been advocated [34]. Seidu A. et al. (2022) reported the Continuum of Care (CoC) level in Angola, which included child vaccinations; however, it also encompassed other cares, such as contraceptive use, and the CoC level was not disaggregated for each care. Furthermore, studies that have examined association between CoC and child undernutrition are scarce [35]. Kuhnt J and Vollmer S (2017) presented negative association between 4 + ANC and child undernutrition, stunting and underweight [35], however, association between child nutrition and CoC which includes child vaccinations are not well known. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the achievement level of CoC for MCH services and examine the association between child nutritional status and the CoC achievement level in Angola.
Methods
Data source
The data were derived from the latest Angola 2015–2016 Multiple Indicator and Health Survey (Inquérito de Indicadores Múltiplos e de Saúde em Angola 2015-16; Angola 2015-16 IIMS) dataset which is publicly available [22]. The Angola 2015-16 IIMS is a first nationally representative household survey which consisted of female, male, and child questionnaires. The female questionnaire includes reproductive health data of women aged 15–49 years, and the child questionnaire includes vaccination and nutritional data of children aged 0–59 months.
Sampling and participants
Sampling procedure is described in Fig. 1. Detailed sampling strategy of Angola IIMS 2015-16 is described in the IIMS 2015–2016 report [22]. The sample was stratified and selected in three stages. At first stage, 3600 primary sampling units (PSUs) were systematically selected based on census area with probability proportional to size of households in each PSU, from each of 36 stratum which consisted of 18 urban and 18 rural areas from 18 provinces of Angola. Then 900 PSU sub-sample was selected with equal probability within the stratum. At second stage, 627 secondary sampling units (SSUs), of which 345 belong to urban areas and 282 to rural areas were selected within each PSU sub-samples with proportional probability to size. Each SSUs consisted of at least 30 households. Within each selected SSUs, a list of households was made. Finally, 26 households from each SSUs were selected with equal probabilities within the SSUs, resulted in total of 16,302 nationally representative household samples. Then 50% of the selected households were chosen for child anthropometric measurement. Women aged from 15 to 49 years and their children aged from 0 to 59 months who slept in the selected households the previous night were eligible for the Angola IIMS 2015-16 survey. 16,224 households completed the survey (99.2%). Within the selected households, 14,975 (100%) women were eligible for the survey, 14,379 (96%) were interviewed, and 596 (4%) were excluded owing to a lack of consent or no availability for the interview. A total of 14,322 (100%) children born to the 14,379 women were eligible for the survey, and 6765 (47.2%) children with anthropometric measurement data were chosen. Additionally, 7557 (52.8%) children were excluded owing to a lack of anthropometric data (47.9%) or because they were deceased (4.9%). Children born after January 2012 were eligible for child vaccination questionnaires, and both these children and their mothers were included in our analysis. This inclusion was necessary as we aimed to investigate the achievement level of continuous care, assessing all series of child vaccinations. The ANC questions were specifically directed to the most recently born children. Therefore, the final sample size for this study was 1698.
Fig. 1.
Sampling procedure
Nutrition variables
The study variables are described in Table 1. We used the four binary child nutrition variables of stunting (yes = 1, no = 0), underweight (yes = 1, no = 0), wasting (yes = 1, no = 0) and a normal nutritional status (yes = 0, no/malnutrition = 1). The children’s nutritional status was defined by World Health Organization Growth Standards [36]. Stunting was defined by a height-for-age z-score < − 2, underweight was defined by a weight-for-age z-score < − 2, and wasting was defined by a weight-for-height z-score < − 2. Normal nutritional status is defined by not stunted, not underweight, not wasted and not overweight/obese. Overweight/obesity was defined by a weight-for-age z-score > 2.
Table 1.
Description and categorization of variables used in the logistic regression analysis
| Variable name | Description |
|---|---|
| Stunting |
Yes/stunting (a height-for-age z-score < − 2) = 1 No/not stunting (a height-for-age z-score − 2 and above) = 0 |
| Underweight |
Yes/ underweight (a weight-for-age z-score < − 2) = 1 No/not underweight (a weight-for-age z-score − 2 and above) = 0 |
| Wasting |
Yes/wasting (a weight-for-height z-score < − 2) = 1 No/no wasting (a weight-for-height z-score − 2 and above) = 0 |
| Normal nutritional status |
Yes/Normal nutritional status/not stunted, not underweight, not wasted and not overweight and obese (a weight-for-age 2 and less) = 0 No/ malnutrition/ either stunted, underweight, wasted, or overweight/obese (a weight-for-age > 2) = 1 |
| CoC1 achievement level |
Four or more antenatal care visits with at least one antenatal care provided by a skilled attendant (doctor, nurse, or birth attendant) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC2 achievement level |
CoC 1 and child delivery assisted by skilled attendant (doctor, nurse, or birth attendant) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC3 achievement level |
CoC 2 and child vaccination at birth (Hepatitis B, Polio, and BCG) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC4 achievement level |
CoC 3 and child’s postnatal care (child’s health checked within 2 months) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC5 achievement level |
CoC 4 and child vaccination at 2 months of age (DTP, Hib and Hepatitis B or pentavalent, and pneumococcal, polio and rotavirus) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC6 achievement level |
CoC 5 and child vaccination at 4 months of age (DTP, Hib and Hepatitis B or pentavalent, and pneumococcal, polio, rotavirus, and Vitamin A) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC7 achievement level |
CoC 6 and child vaccination at 6 months of age (DTP, Hib and Hepatitis B or pentavalent, and pneumococcal and poli0) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC8 achievement level |
CoC 7 and child vaccination at 9 months of age (Measles/Rubella, Vitamin A and Yellow fever) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| CoC9 achievement level |
CoC 8 and child vaccination at 15 months of age (Measles/Rubella) Achieved = 1, Not achieved = 0, Missing = 01) |
| Wealth quintile | Poorest = 1, Poor = 2, Mild = 3, Rich = 4, Richest = 5 |
| Child’s age (months) | 15–24 = 1, 25–48 = 2 |
| Sex of child | Boy = 1, Girl = 2 |
| Birth order | 1st born = 1, 2nd born = 2, 3rd born = 3, 4th born = 4, 5th born = 5 |
CoC; continuum of care
1) Missing is categorized as “censoring” in Kaplan-Meier analysis
Continuum of care variables
In this study, the completion of CoC was defined by four or more ANC visits (at least one ANC visit with a skilled healthcare provider) (4 + ANC) (a), delivery assisted by a skilled birth attendant (SBA) (b), child vaccination at birth (Polio, BCG, Hepatitis B) (c), and child postnatal check within 2 months (postnatal care; PNC) before discharge (d) and at 2 (DTP, Hib and Hepatitis B or pentavalent, and pneumococcal, polio and rotavirus) (e), 4 (DTP, Hib and Hepatitis B or pentavalent, and pneumococcal, polio, rotavirus and Vitamin A) (f), 6 (DTP, Hib and Hepatitis B or pentavalent, and pneumococcal and polio) (g), 9 (Measles/Rubella, Yellow Fever, Vitamin A) (h), and 15 months of age (Measles/Rubella) (i). Child vaccination at birth, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 15 months of age was defined in accordance with Angola vaccination schedule [37]. In Angola IIMS 2015–2016, there are four PNC related variables; “Child’s health checked before discharge”,” Respondent’s health checked before discharge”, “Baby postnatal check within 2 months” and “Respondent’s health checked after discharge/delivery at home”. In this study, we only include “Baby postnatal check within 2 months” because our study included delivery with a skilled birth attendant as CoC2, not institutional delivery, and focused on child outcome. Furthermore, “Respondent’s health checked after discharge/delivery at home” contained many missing values which may affect precision of the analysis. In the generation of variables, a doctor, nurse, or birth attendant was included as a skilled healthcare provider and SBA. We generated the variables CoC 1–9, which were different levels of CoC achievement. CoC 1 was (a), CoC 2 was (a, b), CoC 3 was (a–c), CoC 4 was (a–d), CoC 5 was (a–e), CoC 6 was (a–f), CoC 7 was (a–g), CoC 8 was (a–h), and CoC 9 was (a–i). We did not allow any return to care after dropout since we focused on the continuity of care. For example, if a child skipped 2nd month’s vaccination but returned for 4th month’s vaccination, this child was categorized as CoC not achieved. All CoC variables were coded as achieved = 1 and not achieved = 0. Handling of missing values were different among analysis. In a descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis, we coded each CoC achieved as “1” and other (not achieved and missing) as “0”. In the Kaplan-Meier method, each CoC achieved was coded “1”, not achieved was coded “0”, and missing values were handled as a “censoring”. Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) Guide defines a missing value as a variable that should have a response but does not, either because the question was not asked (due to interviewer error) or the respondent chose not to answer [38]. Including missing values in the analysis is reasonable, as the care utilization questions may be sensitive, particularly for mothers who have not utilized such care and they may refuse to respond.
Statistical analysis
Firstly, the CoC achievement level (CoC 1–9) was described as the number and percentage at each level. Secondly, differences in the CoC achievement level between different nutritional statuses were examined by the generalized Wilcoxon test. Finally, the association between the CoC level and child nutrition was identified by a multivariable logistic regression analysis. All analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). SPSS version 29 complex samples package was used to account for the sampling design. Individual sample weight, sample strata for sampling errors/design, and cluster number were incorporated in descriptive and logistic regression analysis [38]. Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Lank test were done without the weight due to technical restriction.
Kaplan-Meier method was applied to draw survival curves to display differences in the CoC achievement level between different nutritional statuses. Log-Lank test was performed to examine their statistical difference. In this analysis, outcome variables were nutritional status; stunting and not stunting, underweight and not underweight, wasting and no wasting, and at normal nutritional status and malnutrition. Event was defined termination of CoC. Missing data was considered “lost follow-up” and handled as censoring. Y-axis displayed proportion of each CoC achieved and X-axis presented CoC 1–9 achievement level. A p-value of < 0.05 were considered statically significant.
Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between child nutritional status and CoC achievement levels and each independent variable. Nine multivariable logistic regression models were estimated for each outcome. Each model was adjusted by covariates; child age (15–23 months and 24–59 months), child’s sex (girl or boy), birth order, and wealth index (poorest, poor, middle, richer, and richest).
Each model contained one of CoC 1 to CoC 9 and all covariates described above. For example, CoC 1 model contained CoC 1 and all covariates described above. Odds ratio (Odds) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR), along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A p-value of < 0.05 were considered statically significant.
Results
Sample characteristics
The characteristics of the mothers and children are shown in Table 2. We used data of 1968 mother-child pairs from the Angola 2015-16 IIMS dataset who were chosen for anthropometric measurements using the Angola 2015-16 IIMS sampling strategy and eligible for child vaccination questionnaires. The prevalence of child stunting and underweight was 48.3% and 23.2%, respectively. The prevalence of wasting was 5.9% and that of overweight was 3.6%, and 46.3% of children had a normal nutritional status.
Table 2.
Summary of sample characteristics (N = 1,698, Weighted N = 1,580)
| n | % | Weighted n | Weighted % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child’s age (months) | ||||
| 15–24 | 865 | 54.7 | ||
| 25–48 | 715 | 45.3 | ||
| Missing | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| Sex of child | ||||
| Boy | 774 | 49.0 | ||
| Girl | 806 | 51.0 | ||
| Missing | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| Birth order | ||||
| 1st born | 335 | 21.2 | ||
| 2nd born | 305 | 19.3 | ||
| 3rd born | 249 | 15.8 | ||
| 4th born | 206 | 13.0 | ||
| 5th born | 485 | 30.7 | ||
| Missing | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| Wealth quintile | ||||
| Poorest | 314 | 19.9 | ||
| Poor | 338 | 21.4 | ||
| Mild | 349 | 22.1 | ||
| Rich | 317 | 20.1 | ||
| Richest | 262 | 16.6 | ||
| Missing | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| Stunting | ||||
| Yes | 762 | 46.5 | 728 | 48.3 |
| No | 877 | 53.5 | 779 | 51.7 |
| Missing | 59 | 73 | ||
| Underweight | ||||
| Yes | 371 | 22.6 | 350 | 23.2 |
| No | 1269 | 77.4 | 1161 | 76.8 |
| Missing | 58 | 69 | ||
| Wasting | ||||
| Yes | 91 | 5.5 | 89 | 5.9 |
| No | 1562 | 94.5 | 1428 | 94.1 |
| Missing | 45 | 63 | ||
| Overweight | ||||
| Yes | 78 | 4.7 | 54 | 3.6 |
| No | 1575 | 95.3 | 1463 | 96.4 |
| Missing | 45 | 63 | ||
| Normal | ||||
| Yes | 769 | 46.8 | 698 | 46.3 |
| No | 873 | 53.2 | 811 | 53.7 |
| Missing | 56 | 71 |
n; number of subjects
CoC achievement level
The CoC achievement levels are shown in Table 3. The overall CoC completion (CoC 9) rate was 1.2%. A total of 62.8% of pregnant women achieved 4 + ANC (CoC 1) and 42.2% had 4 + ANC and delivery assisted by an SBA (CoC 2). The CoC achievement level decreased from 42.2% at CoC 2 to 23.0% at CoC 3 (PNC). A total of 6.7% of pregnant women achieved CoC 4 (child vaccination at birth), 3.1% achieved CoC 5 (at 2 months), 2.1% achieved CoC 6 (at 4 months), and 1.6% achieved CoC 7 (at 6 months), 1.5% achieved CoC 8 (at 9 months), and 1.2% achieved CoC 9 (at 15 months).
Table 3.
Continuum of care achievement level (Weighted N = 1,580)
| Weighted n | Weighted % | |
|---|---|---|
| CoC 1 achieved | 992 | 62.8 |
| CoC 2 achieved | 667 | 42.2 |
| CoC 3 achieved | 364 | 23.0 |
| CoC 4 achieved | 106 | 6.7 |
| CoC 5 achieved | 49 | 3.1 |
| CoC 6 achieved | 34 | 2.1 |
| CoC 7 achieved | 25 | 1.6 |
| CoC 8 achieved | 24 | 1.5 |
| CoC 9 achieved | 20 | 1.2 |
n; number of subjects. CoC; continuum of care. CoC 1 was defined as four or more antenatal care visits with at least one ANC visit with a skilled healthcare provider. CoC 2 was defined as CoC 1 and delivery assisted by a skilled birth attendant. CoC 3 was defined as CoC 2 and child vaccination at a birth. CoC 4 was defined as CoC 3 and child postnatal care. CoC 5 was defined as CoC 4 and child vaccination at the 2nd month of childbirth. CoC 6 was defined as CoC 5 and child vaccination at the 4th month of childbirth. CoC 7 was defined as CoC 6 and child vaccination at the 6th month of childbirth. CoC 8 was defined as CoC7 and child vaccination at the 9th month of childbirth. CoC 9 was defined as CoC 8 and child vaccination at the 15th month of childbirth
Differences in CoC achievement levels by the nutritional status
Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating differences in CoC achievement levels based on the nutritional status are shown in Fig. 2, while the CoC achievement level based on the nutritional status are shown in Table 4. Kaplan–Meier curve was drawn, and the Log-Lank test compared difference among different nutritional status. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that children with no stunting, those who were not underweight and did not have wasting, and those with a normal nutritional status had a higher CoC achievement level than children with stunting, underweight, wasting, or malnutrition. The Log-Lank test showed significant differences in CoC achievement levels between children with no stunting and those with stunting (p < 0.001), those with no underweight and those with underweight (p < 0.001), those with no wasting and those with wasting (p = 0.003), and those with malnutrition and those with a normal nutritional status (p < 0.001).
Fig. 2.
Differences in CoC achievement levels by the nutritional status as shown by Kaplan–Meier curve analysis. (A) Stunting vs. no stunting. (B) Underweight vs. no underweight. (C) Wasting vs. no wasting. (D) Normal nutritional status vs. malnutrition. CoC; continuum of care. CoC 1 was defined as four or more antenatal care visits with at least one ANC visit with a skilled healthcare provider. CoC 2 was defined as CoC 1 and delivery assisted by a skilled birth attendant. CoC 3 was defined as CoC 2 and child vaccination at birth. CoC 4 was defined as CoC 3 and child postnatal check within 2 months. CoC 5 was defined as CoC 4 and child vaccination at the 2nd month of childbirth. CoC 6 was defined as CoC 5 and child vaccination at the 4th month of childbirth. CoC 7 was defined as CoC 6 and child vaccination at the 6th month of childbirth. CoC 8 was defined as CoC7 and child vaccination at the 9th month of childbirth. CoC 9 was defined as CoC 8 and child vaccination at the 15th month of childbirth
Table 4.
Continuum of care achievement levels by nutritional status
| Stunting | Underweight | Wasting | Normal nutritional status | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| CoC1 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 381 | 50.0 | 564 | 64.3 | 174 | 46.9 | 771 | 60.8 | 39 | 42.9 | 914 | 58.5 | 505 | 65.7 | 441 | 50.5 |
| Not achieved | 375 | 49.2 | 304 | 34.7 | 195 | 52.6 | 485 | 38.2 | 52 | 57.1 | 633 | 40.5 | 255 | 33.2 | 426 | 48.8 |
| Censoring | 6 | 0.8 | 9 | 1.0 | 2 | 0.5 | 13 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 15 | 1.0 | 9 | 1.2 | 6 | 0.7 |
| CoC2 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 219 | 28.7 | 416 | 47.4 | 96 | 25.9 | 539 | 42.5 | 24 | 26.4 | 617 | 39.5 | 371 | 48.2 | 265 | 30.4 |
| Not achieved | 537 | 70.5 | 452 | 51.5 | 273 | 73.6 | 717 | 56.5 | 67 | 73.6 | 930 | 59.5 | 389 | 50.6 | 602 | 69.0 |
| Censoring | 6 | 0.8 | 9 | 1.0 | 2 | 0.5 | 13 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 15 | 1.0 | 9 | 1.2 | 6 | 0.7 |
| CoC3 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 108 | 14.2 | 198 | 22.6 | 41 | 11.1 | 265 | 20.9 | 11 | 12.1 | 297 | 19.0 | 176 | 22.9 | 130 | 14.9 |
| Not achieved | 640 | 84.0 | 664 | 75.7 | 325 | 87.6 | 980 | 77.2 | 79 | 86.8 | 1237 | 79.2 | 579 | 75.3 | 728 | 83.4 |
| Censoring | 14 | 1.8 | 15 | 1.7 | 5 | 1.3 | 24 | 1.9 | 1 | 1.1 | 28 | 1.8 | 14 | 1.8 | 15 | 1.7 |
| CoC4 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 26 | 3.4 | 50 | 5.7 | 8 | 2.2 | 68 | 5.4 | 1 | 1.1 | 75 | 4.8 | 43 | 5.6 | 33 | 3.8 |
| Not achieved | 719 | 94.4 | 805 | 91.8 | 356 | 96.0 | 1169 | 92.1 | 89 | 97.8 | 1449 | 92.8 | 705 | 91.7 | 822 | 94.2 |
| Censoring | 17 | 2.2 | 22 | 2.5 | 7 | 1.9 | 32 | 2.5 | 1 | 1.1 | 38 | 2.4 | 21 | 2.7 | 18 | 2.1 |
| CoC5 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 11 | 1.4 | 27 | 3.1 | 5 | 1.3 | 33 | 2.6 | 1 | 1.1 | 37 | 2.4 | 23 | 3.0 | 15 | 1.7 |
| Not achieved | 716 | 94.0 | 803 | 91.6 | 353 | 95.1 | 1167 | 92.0 | 88 | 96.7 | 1445 | 92.5 | 703 | 91.4 | 819 | 93.8 |
| Censoring | 35 | 4.6 | 47 | 5.4 | 13 | 3.5 | 69 | 5.4 | 2 | 2.2 | 80 | 5.1 | 43 | 5.6 | 39 | 4.5 |
| CoC6 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 9 | 1.2 | 19 | 2.2 | 4 | 1.1 | 24 | 1.9 | 1 | 1.1 | 27 | 1.7 | 16 | 2.1 | 12 | 1.4 |
| Not achieved | 718 | 94.2 | 811 | 92.5 | 354 | 95.4 | 1176 | 92.7 | 88 | 96.7 | 1455 | 93.1 | 710 | 92.3 | 822 | 94.2 |
| Censoring | 35 | 4.6 | 47 | 5.4 | 13 | 3.5 | 69 | 5.4 | 2 | 2.2 | 80 | 5.1 | 43 | 5.6 | 39 | 4.5 |
| CoC7 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 4 | 0.5 | 14 | 1.6 | 3 | 0.8 | 15 | 1.2 | 1 | 1.1 | 17 | 1.1 | 12 | 1.6 | 6 | 0.7 |
| Not achieved | 723 | 94.9 | 816 | 93.0 | 355 | 95.7 | 1185 | 93.4 | 88 | 96.7 | 1465 | 93.8 | 714 | 92.8 | 828 | 94.8 |
| Censoring | 35 | 4.6 | 47 | 5.4 | 13 | 3.5 | 69 | 5.4 | 2 | 2.2 | 80 | 5.1 | 43 | 5.6 | 39 | 4.5 |
| CoC8 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 3 | 0.4 | 13 | 1.5 | 2 | 0.5 | 14 | 1.1 | 1 | 1.1 | 15 | 1.0 | 11 | 1.4 | 5 | 0.6 |
| Not achieved | 724 | 95.0 | 812 | 92.6 | 356 | 96.0 | 1181 | 93.1 | 88 | 96.7 | 1462 | 93.6 | 710 | 92.3 | 829 | 95.0 |
| Censoring | 35 | 4.6 | 52 | 5.9 | 13 | 3.5 | 74 | 5.8 | 2 | 2.2 | 85 | 5.4 | 48 | 6.2 | 39 | 4.5 |
| CoC9 completion | ||||||||||||||||
| Achieved | 3 | 0.4 | 11 | 1.3 | 2 | 0.5 | 12 | 0.9 | 1 | 1.1 | 13 | 0.8 | 9 | 1.2 | 5 | 0.6 |
| Not achieved | 724 | 95.0 | 814 | 92.8 | 356 | 96.0 | 1183 | 93.2 | 88 | 96.7 | 1464 | 93.7 | 712 | 92.6 | 829 | 95.0 |
| Censoring | 35 | 4.6 | 52 | 5.9 | 13 | 3.5 | 74 | 5.8 | 2 | 2.2 | 85 | 5.4 | 48 | 6.2 | 39 | 4.5 |
CoC; continuum of care. CoC 1 was defined as four or more antenatal care visits with at least one ANC visit with a skilled healthcare provider. CoC 2 was defined as CoC 1 and delivery assisted by a skilled birth attendant. CoC 3 was defined as CoC 2 and child vaccination at a birth. CoC 4 was defined as CoC 3 and child postnatal care. CoC 5 was defined as CoC 4 and child vaccination at the 2nd month of childbirth. CoC 6 was defined as CoC 5 and child vaccination at the 4th month of childbirth. CoC 7 was defined as CoC 6 and child vaccination at the 6th month of childbirth. CoC 8 was defined as CoC7 and child vaccination at the 9th month of childbirth. CoC 9 was defined as CoC 8 and child vaccination at the 15th month of childbirth
Association between children’s nutritional status and CoC achievement levels
The result of the logistic regression analysis is shown in Table 5. Achieving CoC 1 (AOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.443–0.821), CoC 2 (AOR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.285–0.535), and CoC 3 (AOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.284–0.617), had smaller odds of being stunted compared to not achieving each CoC. Achieving CoC 1 (AOR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.489–0.939), CoC 2 (AOR: 0.53 0.70, 95% CI: 0.329 0.533–0.845 0.911) and CoC 3 (AOR: 0.40 0.70, 95% CI: 0.239 0.496–0.675 0.968) had smaller odds of being underweight compared to not achieving each CoC. No significant association between wasting and CoC was not observed.
Table 5.
Result of logistic regression analysis
| Stunting | Underweight | Wasting | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | OR (95%CI) |
AOR (95%CI) |
n (%) | OR (95%CI) |
AOR (95%CI) |
n (%) | OR (95%CI) |
AOR (95%CI) |
|
| CoC1 (achieved) | 381 (40.3) |
0.55 (0.401–0.749) |
0.60 (0.443–0.821) |
174 (18.4) |
0.59 (0.432–0.807) |
0.68 (0.489–0.939) |
39 (4.1) |
0.61 (0.369–1.015) |
0.65 (0.389–1.086) |
| CoC2 (achieved) | 219 (34.5) |
0.36 (0.262–0.481) |
0.39 (0.285–0.535) |
96 (15.1) |
0.44 (0.29–0.679) |
0.53 (0.329–0.845) |
67 (6.7) |
0.76 (0.4-1.451) |
0.86 (0.45–1.623) |
| CoC3 (achieved) | 108 (35.3) |
0.38 (0.257–0.559) |
0.42 (0.284–0.617) |
41 (13.4) |
0.34 (0.208–0.561) |
0.402 (0.239–0.675) |
11 (3.6) |
0.50 (0.193–1.294) |
0.54 (0.211–1.382) |
| CoC4 (achieved) | 26 (34.2) |
0.45 (0.201–1.005) |
0.48 (0.217–1.066) |
8 (10.5) |
0.33 (0.106–1.02) |
0.39 (0.123–1.211) |
1 (1.3) |
0.09 (0.012–0.695) |
0.20 (0.013–0.717) |
| CoC5 (achieved) | 11 (28.9) |
0.32 (0.077–1.364) |
0.33 (0.083–1.331) |
5 (13.2) |
0.37 (0.087–1.613) |
0.42 (0.097–1.818) |
1 (2.6) |
0.21 (0.027–1.649) |
0.20 (0.025–1.592) |
| CoC6 (achieved) | 9 (32.1) |
0.53 (0.114–2.481) |
0.52 (0.116–2.364) |
4 (14.3) |
0.56 (0.132–2.379) |
0.61 (0.139–2.669) |
1 (3.6) |
0.31 (0.038–2.525) |
0.29 (0.035–2.42) |
| CoC7 (achieved) | 4 (22.2 |
0.52 (0.067–4.009) |
0.53 (0.073–3.831) |
3 (16.7) |
0.77 (0.176–3.401) |
0.91 (0.211–3.933) |
1 (5.6) |
0.43 (0.049–3.73) |
0.39 (0.043–3.55) |
| CoC8 (achieved) | 3 (18.8) |
0.52 (0.064–4.255) |
0.54 (0.071–4.071) |
2 (12.5) |
0.76 (0.163–3.546) |
0.91 (0.2-4.113) |
1 (6.3) |
0.44 (0.05–3.886) |
0.41(0.044–3.746) |
| CoC9 (achieved) | 3 (21.4) |
0.73 (0.085–6.281) |
0.81 (0.112–5.912) |
2 (14.3) |
0.99 (0.229–4.297) |
1.28 (0.339–4.859) |
1 (7.1) |
0.55 (0.058–5.103) |
0.53 (0.053–5.33) |
n; number of stunting, %: percentage of stunting, OR; Odds Ratio. CI; Confidential Interval. AOR; Adjusted Odds Ratio. CoC; continuum of care. CoC 1 was defined as four or more antenatal care visits with at least one ANC visit with a skilled healthcare provider. CoC 2 was defined as CoC 1 and delivery assisted by a skilled birth attendant. CoC 3 was defined as CoC 2 and child vaccination at a birth. CoC 4 was defined as CoC 3 and child postnatal care. CoC 5 was defined as CoC 4 and child vaccination at the 2nd month of childbirth. CoC 6 was defined as CoC 5 and child vaccination at the 4th month of childbirth. CoC 7 was defined as CoC 6 and child vaccination at the 6th month of childbirth. CoC 8 was defined as CoC7 and child vaccination at the 9th month of childbirth. CoC 9 was defined as CoC 8 and child vaccination at the 15th month of childbirth. Multivariable logistic regression models were adjusted with child age, child's sex, birth order and wealth quintile
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the achievement level of continuous care utilization by mother-child pairs from pregnancy to 15th month of child vaccination in Angola. There are numbers of studies assessed CoC achievement levels, however, most of them did not include child vaccination [37–47]. Vaccinations prevent children from diseases which may result in child undernutrition. Furthermore, visiting health facility for vaccination also increase children’s opportunity to be screened for nutritional status. Association of CoC with child undernutrition had described previously, however, only ANC was taken into account [36]. Our study analyzed association between CoC from pregnancy to 15th month of child vaccination and undernutrition by Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Lank test, and logistic regression analysis.
CoC achievement level
This study showed a low CoC completion level. Only 1.2% of mother-child pairs received continuous care of 4 + ANC, child delivery assisted by an SBA, child vaccination at birth, PNC, and all series of child vaccinations. Comparing our findings with the previous studies from Angola and neighboring countries is difficult because the definition of CoC completion varies among studies. Seidu A. et al. (2022) reported a CoC achievement level of 1.2% in Angola, including 4 + ANC, neonatal tetanus protection, facility-based delivery, Skilled Birth Attendant (SBA), PNC within the first 2 days after birth, BCG, DPT, Polio, Measles, age-appropriate breastfeeding, and current use of modern contraceptives [48]. The CoC completion levels, including all series of child vaccinations, in Myanmar and Timor-Leste were 4.0% and 5.6%, respectively [33]. Angola and these two countries have been affected by war or domestic conflict.
Pregnant women who had 4 + ANC was 62.8%. Therefore, 37.2% of these women did not meet the minimum requirement specified by the World Health Organization of at least four ANC visits [49]. In the same sample, the percentage of pregnant women who had at least one ANC visit was 81.9% (data not shown). Therefore, the utilization of care continuity needs to be strengthened. A long distance to a health facility [50], the mother’s low education level [23, 28, 30, 31], the partner’s low education level [48], less participation of women in decision-making [48], economic restrictions [24, 26–29], and a lack of knowledge regarding ANC [51] prevent mothers from utilizing ANC. A delay in a first ANC visit also contributes to less frequency of ANC visits [52].
There was 20.6% difference between women with 4 + ANC (62.8%) and those with 4 + ANC and child delivery assisted by an SBA (42.2%) in this study. Previous studies show that the utilization [53] and better experience [54] of ANC leads mothers to deliver at a health facility and/or with an SBA and mothers who were not exposed to delivery care information were less likely to deliver at a health facility. Therefore, this low percentage in our study suggested that health care providers did not sufficiently educate mothers on the importance of delivery with an SBA during ANC. There are also other reasons why women avoid delivery with an SBA or institutional delivery, such as economic restrictions [24, 26–29] and a long distance to a health facility [23].
The CoC achievement level decreased by 19.2% from child delivery assisted by an SBA (42.2%) to child vaccination at birth (23.0%). A total of 6.7% of pregnant women achieved CoC 4, which was a 16.3% decrease in CoC achievement level from child vaccination at birth to PNC. Child vaccination at birth should be offered at a health facility before discharge or at the place of birth within 24 h [55]. This situation suggests there is an issue regarding the service provider in that they may not appropriately offer the necessary care.
In this study, only 3.1% of mother-child pairs achieved CoC for child vaccination at 2 months, and this level decreased to 1.2% at 15 months. The achievement level of continuous care regarding child vaccinations is very low and many children miss opportunities to be screened for their nutritional status. Mothers usually bring children to a health facility for vaccinations; therefore, the mothers’ decision to act is important for child vaccination. Oliveira et al. described that being aware of a vaccination program was associated with uptake of child vaccinations in Angola [56]. Therefore, raising awareness before childbirth enables children to receive vaccinations.
Differences in CoC achievement levels by the nutritional status
The importance of CoC to improve child nutrition has been advocated [34], but supporting evidence is limited. Therefore, this study attempted to examine differences in CoC achievement levels by different nutritional statuses and added new evidence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report a significant difference in the CoC achievement levels which include child vaccination by child nutritional status. Our study is unique because it analyzed the difference in CoC achievement trends according to child nutritional status by performing the Log-Lank test. We found that children who were not stunted, were not underweight, did not have wasting, or had a normal nutritional status achieved a higher CoC level than children who were stunted, underweight, wasted, or malnourished.
Association between child undernutrition and CoC achievement levels
The associations between each CoC achievement level and child nutritional status were examined using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The CoC was partially associated with child stunting and underweight.
Achieving 4 + ANC (CoC 1), 4 + ANC and delivery with a skilled birth attendant (CoC 2), and 4 + ANC, delivery with a skilled birth attendant and child vaccination at birth (CoC 3) were associated with reduction in child stunting and underweight. A positive association between stunting and 4 + ANC as well as underweight and 4 + ANC has previously been described [35]. However, this study is the first to show an association between further continuous care utilization (CoC 2 and CoC 3) and better child nutrition. Significant association between above CoC level 4 (CoC 4–9) and undernutrition were not observed. It is probably due to small number of mother-child pairs who achieved those CoC levels. In addition, there is also a possibility of underserved. Even mother-child pair reached the care, appropriate nutrition service may not be offered. Evidence from rural Kenya showed that approximately 12% of children were not properly assessed or did not have their growth recorded at the time of their vaccinations [57].
Limitations
There are some limitations to this study. Firstly, restricting participants to children eligible for vaccination questionnaires, along with their mothers, compromised the representativeness of the data. The percentage of stunting in this study was 46.5% (not weighted), while it was reported as 38% in the Angola 2015-16 report [22]. However, to assess the level of care continuity, including from ANC to all series of child vaccinations, which are evidently important for child nutrition, limiting participants could not be avoided. Secondly, a certain number of missing values may have affected the quality of the analysis, even though these values constituted less than 5%. The DHS defines a missing value as a variable that should have a response but does not, either because the question was not asked (due to interviewer error) or the respondent chose not to answer [38]. There is a possibility of non-response bias, especially regarding questions about the utilization of MCH care. These questions might be sensitive, particularly for mothers who have not utilized such care. Lastly, there are disadvantages in using secondary data. The variable of child consultation did not exist, even though nutrition assessment, counselling and other necessary intervention were conducted during child consultations. We also could not guarantee that all ANC were provided by a skilled provider because “at least one ANC visit with a skilled provider” was the only applicable variable. Therefore, because of these limitations, our study may have overestimated or underestimated the CoC achievement level in mothers and children in Angola. Recall bias, especially for older children, also needs to be taken into consideration. Due to the nature of Angola IIMS 2015–2016 methodology, interviewed mothers for their children age of under 5 years, recall bias could not be avoided. Despite these limitations, using the Angola 2015-16 IIMS dataset was the best method to attain the study objectives because it included mothers and children who did not utilize MCH services or dropped out from these services.
Conclusion
Our study assessed the achievement level of CoC for MCH services and examined the association between the child nutritional status and CoC achievement level in Angola. This study suggests that the CoC completion level is low in Angola. However, among mother-child pairs who achieve a high CoC level, children tend to have no stunting, are not underweight, do not have wasting, and have a normal nutritional status. A low CoC (CoC 1–3) achievement level is associated with undernutrition in children. These findings suggest that early involvement of women in MCH services and education of mothers regarding the importance of utilizing MCH services are required to prevent child malnutrition. Further studies are required to investigate the implementation status of nutritional screening and other nutritional interventions, and the delivery of MCH service information at every visit. According to our result, improving care utilization and its continuity could improve child nutritional status.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank the DHS programs for providing us access to Angola 2015-16 IIMS data.
Abbreviations
- CoC
Continuum of Care
- ANC
Antenatal care
- SBA
Skilled birth attendant
- PNC
Postnatal care
- MCH
Maternal and child health
- IIMS
Multiple Indicator and Health Survey (Inquérito de Indicadores Múltiplos e de Saúde em Angola 2015-16)
- DHS
Demographic and Health Survey
- OR
Odds ratio
- aOR
adjusted odds ratio
- 95%CI
95% confidence interval
Author contributions
AS conceived the idea, performed statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript, and interpreted the results. MK helped in statistical analysis and results interpretation, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKEN)(20K23167). The funding agency had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication.
Data availability
Data are available upon requests made to MEASURE DHS (URL: http://www.dhsprogram.com).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval was not required for this study because the data is available in the public domain with personal identifier (URL: http://www.dhsprogram.com) via online request.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Fernald LC, Grantham-McGregor SM. Stress response in school-age children who have been growth retarded since early childhood. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(3):691–8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.3.691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pelletier DL, Frongillo EA, Jr, Schroeder DG, Habicht J-P. The effects of malnutrition on child mortality in developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(4):443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martorell R. The nature of child malnutrition and its long-term implications. FoodNutr Bull. 1999;20(3):288–92. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gardner JMM, Grantham-McGregor SM, Himes J, Chang S. Behaviour and development of stunted and nonstunted Jamaican children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Disciplines. 1999;40(5):819–27. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, De Onis M, Ezzati M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371(9608):243–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal PC, Martorell R, Richter L, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):340–57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kossmann J, Nestel P, Herrera M, Amin A, Fawzi W. Undernutrition in relation to childhood infections: a prospective study in the Sudan. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(6):463–72. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Olofin I, McDonald CM, Ezzati M, Flaxman S, Black RE, Fawzi WW, et al. Associations of suboptimal growth with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in children under five years: a pooled analysis of ten prospective studies. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e64636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walson JL, Berkley JA. The impact of malnutrition on childhood infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31(3):231. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lasky RE, Klein RE, Yarbrough C, Engle PL, Lechtig A, Martorell R. The relationship between physical growth and infant behavioral development in rural Guatemala. Child development. 1981:219– 26. [PubMed]
- 11.Webb K, Horton N, Katz D. Parental IQ and cognitive development of malnourished Indonesian children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59(4):618–20. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Adair LS, Fall CH, Osmond C, Stein AD, Martorell R, Ramirez-Zea M, et al. Associations of linear growth and relative weight gain during early life with adult health and human capital in countries of low and middle income: findings from five birth cohort studies. Lancet. 2013;382(9891):525–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60103-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crookston BT, Schott W, Cueto S, Dearden KA, Engle P, Georgiadis A, et al. Postinfancy growth, schooling, and cognitive achievement: young lives. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(6):1555–63. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.067561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sandjaja S, Budiman B, Harahap H, Ernawati F, Soekatri M, Widodo Y, et al. Food consumption and nutritional and biochemical status of 0·5-12-year-old Indonesian children: the SEANUTS study. Br J Nutr. 2013;110(Suppl 3):11–20. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513002109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Casale D, Desmond C, Richter L. The association between stunting and psychosocial development among preschool children: a study using the South African birth to twenty cohort data. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40(6):900–10. doi: 10.1111/cch.12143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jamison DT. Child malnutrition and school performance in China. J Dev Econ. 1986;20(2):299–309. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(86)90026-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moock PR, Leslie J. Childhood malnutrition and schooling in the Terai region of Nepal. J Dev Econ. 1986;20(1):33–52. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(86)90004-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beasley N, Hall A, Tomkins A, Donnelly C, Ntimbwa P, Kivuga J, et al. The health of enrolled and non enrolled children of school age in Tanga, Tanzania. Acta Trop. 2000;76(3):223–9. doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(00)00101-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hoddinott J, Maluccio JA, Behrman JR, Flores R, Martorell R. Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):411–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ruel MT, Alderman H. Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition? Lancet. 2013;382(9891):536–51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keats EC, Das JK, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Imdad A, Black RE, et al. Effective interventions to address maternal and child malnutrition: an update of the evidence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(5):367–84. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30274-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE) Ministério Da Saúde (MINSA), Ministério do Planeamento E do Desenvolvimento Territorial (MINPLAN) and ICF. Inquérito De Indicadores Múltiplos E De Saúde em Angola 2015–2016. Angola e Rockville, Maryland, EUA: Luanda; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rosario EVN, Gomes MC, Brito M, Costa D. Determinants of maternal health care and birth outcome in the Dande Health and demographic Surveillance System area, Angola. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stewart CL, Hall JA. Factors that affect the utilisation of maternal healthcare in the Mchinji District of Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0279613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(3):244–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Banke-Thomas OE, Banke-Thomas AO, Ameh CA. Factors influencing utilisation of maternal health services by adolescent mothers in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1246-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nyongesa C, Xu X, Hall JJ, Macharia WM, Yego F, Hall B. Factors influencing choice of skilled birth attendance at ANC: evidence from the Kenya demographic health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1727-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Agbaglo E, Adu C, Budu E, Hagan JE, Jr, et al. Determinants of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance services utilization among childbearing women in Guinea: evidence from the 2018 Guinea demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03489-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dimitrova A, Carrasco-Escobar G, Richardson R, Benmarhnia T. Essential childhood immunization in 43 low- and middle-income countries: analysis of spatial trends and socioeconomic inequalities in vaccine coverage. PLoS Med. 2023;20(1):e1004166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shibre G, Zegeye B, Idriss-Wheeler D, Yaya S. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care services among women in Guinea: a population-based study. Fam Pract. 2021;38(2):63–9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yunitasari E, Wahyuning Putri DU, Alit Armini NK, Sudarsiwi NP, Ramoo V. Analysis of factors that affect the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: a systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(Suppl 2):S162–S9. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tsala Dimbuene Z, Amo-Adjei J, Amugsi D, Mumah J, Izugbara CO, Beguy D. Women’s education and Utilization of Maternal Health Services in Africa: a multi-country and socioeconomic status analysis. J Biosoc Sci. 2018;50(6):725–48. doi: 10.1017/S0021932017000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andriani H, Rahmawati ND, Fauzia S, Kosasih RI. Population-based study on the maternal-newborn-child Health Continuum of Care: evidence from Lower-Middle-Income Countries in Southeast Asia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2022;34(5):547–56. doi: 10.1177/10105395221088615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kerber KJ, de Graft-Johnson JE, Bhutta ZA, Okong P, Starrs A, Lawn JE. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1358-69. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5. PMID: 17933651. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Kuhnt J, Vollmer S. Antenatal care services and its implications for vital and health outcomes of children: evidence from 193 surveys in 69 low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e017122. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.World Health Organization. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. Geneva; 2006.
- 37.World Health Organization. Vaccination schedule for Angola. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 21] Available from: https://immunizationdata.who.int/pages/schedule-by-country/ago.html?DISEASECODE=&TARGETPOP_GENERAL=.
- 38.Croft, Trevor N, Aileen MJ, Marshall CK, Allen, et al. Guide to DHS statistics. Maryland, USA: ICF: Rockville; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Osaki K, Hattori T, Kosen S. The role of home-based records in the establishment of a continuum of care for mothers, newborns, and children in Indonesia. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:1–12. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yeji F, Shibanuma A, Oduro A, Debpuur C, Kikuchi K, Owusu-Agei S, et al. Continuum of Care in a maternal, Newborn and Child Health Program in Ghana: low completion rate and multiple obstacle factors. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0142849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Iqbal S, Maqsood S, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Continuum of care in maternal, newborn and child health in Pakistan: analysis of trends and determinants from 2006 to 2012. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2111-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sakuma S, Yasuoka J, Phongluxa K, Jimba M. Determinants of continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health services in rural Khammouane, Lao PDR. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0215635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kikuchi K, Gyapong M, Shibanuma A, Asah E, Okawa S, Addei S, et al. EMBRACE intervention to improve the continuum of care in maternal and newborn health in Ghana: the RE-AIM framework-based evaluation. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04017. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kothavale A, Meher T. Level of completion along continuum of care for maternal, newborn and child health services and factors associated with it among women in India: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04198-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rammohan A, Mavisakalyan A, Vu L, Goli S. Exposure to conflicts and the continuum of maternal healthcare: analyses of pooled cross-sectional data for 452,192 women across 49 countries and 82 surveys. PLoS Med. 2021;18(9):e1003690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shibanuma A, Ansah EK, Kikuchi K, Yeji F, Okawa S, Tawiah C, et al. Evaluation of a package of continuum of care interventions for improved maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes and service coverage in Ghana: a cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2021;18(6):e1003663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.James K, Mishra US, Pallikadavath S. Sequential impact of components of maternal and child health care services on the continuum of care in India. J Biosoc Sci. 2022;54(3):450–72.
- 48.Seidu AA, Ahinkorah BO, Aboagye RG, Okyere J, Budu E, Yaya S. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn, and child health in 17 sub-saharan African countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08693-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.World Health Organization. (2002). WHO antenatal care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model. World Health Organization.
- 50.Enos JY, Amoako RD, Doku IK, Utilization Predictors and gaps in the Continuum of Care for Maternal and Newborn Health in Ghana. Int J MCH AIDS. 2021;10(1):98–108. doi: 10.21106/ijma.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Humbwavali JB, Giugliani C, Duncan BB, Harzheim E, Lavor AC, Lavor MC, et al. Health and health care of mothers and children in a suburban area of Luanda, Angola. J Community Health. 2014;39(3):617–26. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9808-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sserwanja Q, Musaba MW, Mutisya LM, Olal E, Mukunya D. Continuum of maternity care in Zambia: a national representative survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04080-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Boah M, Mahama AB, Ayamga EA. They receive antenatal care in health facilities, yet do not deliver there: predictors of health facility delivery by women in rural Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1749-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aoki A et al. Aug. Association between the quality of care and continuous maternal and child health service utilisation in Angola: Longitudinal data analysis. Journal of global health vol. 13 04073. 11 2023, 10.7189/jogh.13.04073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.World health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva; 2016. [PubMed]
- 56.Oliveira MF, Martinez EZ, Rocha JS. Factors associated with vaccination coverage in children < 5 years in Angola. Rev Saude Publica. 2014;48(6):906–15. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Brown DW, Tabu C, Sergon K, Shendale S, Mugoya I, Machekanyanga Z, et al. Home-based record (HBR) ownership and use of HBR recording fields in selected Kenyan communities: results from the Kenya missed opportunities for Vaccination Assessment. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available upon requests made to MEASURE DHS (URL: http://www.dhsprogram.com).