Abstract
This article presents data of the effects of fly ash on growth and yield of radish plant under two types of soil (delta clay rich soil and coastal sandy soil). The experiment was conducted under semi-controlled conditions in a greenhouse at the Faculty of Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture (latitude 21°0′01N, longitude 105° 9′32″ W). The experiment has been conducted with the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), each experimental formula was repeated 5 times. A total of 10 experimental formulas were performed including 100% delta clay rich soil, 95% delta clay rich soil+5% FA, 90% delta clay rich soil+10% FA, 85% delta clay rich soil+15% FA, 80% delta clay rich soil+20% FA, 100% coastal sandy soil, 95% coastal sandy soil+5%FA, 90% coastal sandy soil +10%FA, 85% coastal sandy soil+15%FA, and 80% coastal sandy soil+20%FA. Data on germination rate, plant height, number of leaves, SPAD values, leaf area, shoot fresh and dry weight, storage-root traits, storage-root fresh and dry weight were collected to assess the effects of fly ash on growth and yield of radish plant under delta clay rich soil and coastal sandy soil. This data could help develop a strategy fly ash application for crop cultivation.
Keywords: Radish plant, Fly ash, Delta clay rich soil, Coastal sandy soil, Storage-root
Specifications Table
| Subject | Agricultural Science |
| Specific subject area | Agronomy |
| Data format | Raw |
| Type of data | Tables |
| How data were acquired | We used a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the average values among treatments. Least significant difference (LSD) test was used to find the means that were significantly different from each other. Data were analyzed using the IRRISTAT 5.0 software. |
| Data format | Raw |
| Data collection | The experiment was conducted under semi-controlled conditions in a greenhouse. A total of 10 experimental formulas were performed including 100% delta clay rich soil, 95% delta clay rich soil+5% FA, 90% delta clay rich soil+10% FA, 85% delta clay rich soil+15% FA, 80% delta clay rich soil+20% FA, 100% coastal sandy soil, 95% coastal sandy soil+5%FA, 90% coastal sandy soil +10%FA, 85% coastal sandy soil+15%FA, and 80% coastal sandy soil+20%FA. The germination rate was recorded at 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th after sowing. Plant height and number of leaves were measured at 11st, 21st, 31st, 41st, 51st, 61st and 71st after sowing. SPAD values were collected at 30th, 42nd, 54th, 66th after sowing. The leaf area, shoot fresh and dry weight, storage-root traits, storage-root fresh and dry weight measured at the harvest stage. Plant height is the height from the tip of the longest leaf. SPAD index using SPAD (Konica-Minolta 502, Japan). Leaf area was calculated by leaf area meter (Li-3100, Lin Coln Nebraska USA). Fresh weight was measured by using electronic balance (OHAUS PR4202, USA). Dry weight of tuber was determined after drying samples at 80 °C for three days in drying chamber (BINDER, USA) until constant weight. Dry samples were weighted by the electronic balance (OHAUS STX-223, USA). |
| Data source location | Raw data was stored in OSFHOME |
| Data accessibility | Repository name: OSFHOME Data identification number: ezck8 Direct URL to data: https://osf.io/ezck8 |
1. Value of the Data
-
•
The dataset illustrates the effects of fly ash on growth and yield of radish plant under two types of soil (delta clay rich soil and coastal sandy soil)..
-
•
The data could be valuable for researchers studying on fly ash application for crops.
-
•
The data also provides a strategy for using fly ash for radish cultivatin under different soil types. It normally had positive effect to the radish in 5% and 10% fly ash.
2. Background
Fly ash (FA) has been well-described as a combustible brownish-black sedimentary rock that has been used as a crucial energy source for industries and power generation around the world. However, the burning of coal has been identified as one of the major causes of global environmental issues such as air pollution, climate change, and environmental degradation. Recently, FA has been shown to have potential applications in agriculture, particularly in soil amendment and crop production. However, FA for crops under soil types remains unclear.
3. Data Description
Table 1 presents data on effects of fly ash the germination rate (%) of radish plant under two types of soil . The raw data for Table 1 is presented in the Supplementary file “Germination rate”. Data on plant height (Table 2), number of leaves (Table 3), SPAD values (Table 4), leaf area (Table 5), shoot fresh and dry weight (Table 6), storage-root traits (Table 7), storage-root fresh and dry weight (Table 8) were collected to assess the effects of fly ash applicaton rate, soil types and their interaction on the growth and yield of radish plant. The raw data for Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 is presented in the Supplementary file “Plant height”, “Number of leaves”, “SPAD value”, “Leaf area”, “Fresh and dry weight of shoot”, “Storage root traits”, and “Root fresh and dry weight ”, respectively.
Table 1.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on germination rate (%) of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
Germination rate (%) at …days after sowing |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 0% | 8 | 56 | 84 | 96 | 96 | 100 | |
| 5% | 28 | 80 | 92 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 40 | 76 | 84 | 92 | 100 | 100 |
| 15% | 4 | 44 | 76 | 96 | 100 | 100 | |
| 20% | 24 | 80 | 88 | 92 | 100 | 100 | |
| Average | 20.8 | 67.2 | 84.8 | 96 | 99.2 | 100 | |
| 0% | 92 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 5% | 76 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 64 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 15% | 84 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| 20% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Average | 83.2 | 99.2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
Table 2.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on plant height (cm) of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
Plant height of radish at…days after sowing |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | 11 | 21 | 31 | 41 | 51 | 61 | 71 |
| 0% | 8.32 | 11.26 | 13.18 | 17.22 | 25.96 | 28.2 | 29.72a | |
| 5% | 9.02 | 14.12 | 16.42 | 20.88 | 27.42 | 29.3 | 30.74a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 10.1 | 14.18 | 16.76 | 20.72 | 27 | 29.16 | 30.58a |
| 15% | 9.14 | 13.22 | 14.78 | 18.1 | 26.16 | 28.7 | 30.12a | |
| 20% | 8.66 | 13.1 | 14.76 | 16.82 | 25.6 | 28.2 | 29.98a | |
| Average | 9.05 | 13.18 | 15.18 | 18.75 | 26.43 | 28.71 | 30.23 | |
| 0% | 9.02 | 10.22 | 12.96 | 14.36 | 17.58 | 19.08 | 20.04c | |
| 5% | 9.38 | 13.2 | 14.68 | 16.94 | 19.64 | 21.6 | 23.64b | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 9.16 | 13.62 | 15.06 | 17.22 | 20.14 | 22 | 24.94b |
| 15% | 8.74 | 13.6 | 14.78 | 17.14 | 19.6 | 21.9 | 24.62b | |
| 20% | 7.86 | 10.12 | 11.7 | 13.3 | 18.2 | 21.5 | 24.6b | |
| Average | 8.83 | 12.15 | 13.84 | 15.79 | 19.03 | 21.22 | 23.57 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.70 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.88 | 1.07 | 1.11 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 1.25 | 1.51 | 1.56 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05S*FA) for the different soil types at the defefferent FA rates.
Table 3.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on number of leaves of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
Number of leaves at … days after sowing |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | 11 | 21 | 31 | 41 | 51 | 61 | 71 |
| 0% | 2 | 5 | 9 | 10.4 | 14.4 | 20.2 | 17.8bc | |
| 5% | 2 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 13.5 | 16.8 | 19.4a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 2 | 5 | 8.8 | 11.4 | 14.2 | 18.4 | 19.4a |
| 15% | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10.4 | 13.4 | 18.6 | 18.4b | |
| 20% | 2 | 3.2 | 7 | 9.2 | 13.6 | 16.5 | 17.4c | |
| Average | 2 | 4.44 | 8.36 | 10.48 | 13.82 | 18.1 | 18.48 | |
| 0% | 3 | 4 | 7.2 | 10.4 | 11.4 | 13.6 | 12.4g | |
| 5% | 3 | 3.8 | 6.8 | 8.8 | 10.75 | 14.8 | 15.6d | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 2.6 | 3.6 | 7.8 | 9.2 | 10.6 | 14.6 | 14.5e |
| 15% | 2.8 | 3.8 | 7.2 | 9 | 10.6 | 15 | 15.4d | |
| 20% | 3 | 4 | 6.6 | 8 | 9.4 | 12.5 | 13.6f | |
| Average | 2.88 | 3.84 | 7.12 | 9.08 | 10.55 | 14.1 | 14.3 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.29 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.46 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.64 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05S*FA) for the different soil types at the defefferent FA rates.
Table 4.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on SPAD value of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
SPAD values of radish plant at …days after sowing |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | 30 | 42 | 54 | 66 |
| 0% | 33.2 | 37.9 | 47.02 | 52.96a | |
| 5% | 35.48 | 38.08 | 46.82 | 52.44a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 32.56 | 37.14 | 45.44 | 49.74b |
| 15% | 34.68 | 40 | 46.94 | 48.8bc | |
| 20% | 34.96 | 39.1 | 41.96 | 48.18 bc | |
| Average | 34.176 | 38.444 | 45.636 | 50.424 | |
| 0% | 33.02 | 37.54 | 47.86 | 48.34 bc | |
| 5% | 33.32 | 38.50 | 44.28 | 47.1c | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 35.14 | 38.76 | 44.12 | 48.04 bc |
| 15% | 35.94 | 37.28 | 44.58 | 44.7 d | |
| 20% | 32.96 | 36.18 | 43.34 | 43.5 e | |
| Average | 34.076 | 37.650 | 44.836 | 46.336 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 0.666 | 0.733 | 0.692 | 0.939 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 1.052 | 1.159 | 1.094 | 1.484 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 1.488 | 1.639 | 1.547 | 2.099 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05S*FA) for the different soil types at the defefferent FA rates.
Table 5.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on leaf area (dm2 plant−1) of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
Leaf area (dm2 plant−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | |
| 0% | 16.873b | |
| 5% | 19.774a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 16.894b |
| 15% | 16.557c | |
| 20% | 16.094d | |
| Average | 17.24 | |
| 0% (Sample2) | 10.773g | |
| 5% | 10.594gh | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 12.195f |
| 15% | 12.791e | |
| 20% | 10.366h | |
| Average | 13.24 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 0.371 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 0.586 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 2.616 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05S*FA) for the different soil types at the defefferent FA rates.
Table 6.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on shoot fresh and dry weight (g plant−1) of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
Shoot fresh weight (g plant−1) | Shoot dry weight (g plant−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | ||
| 0% | 78.320b | 5.698b | |
| 5% | 92.326a | 7.058a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 79.832b | 6.472ab |
| 15% | 71.662c | 6.119b | |
| 20% | 69.974c | 5.823b | |
| Average | 78.42 | 6.23 | |
| 0% | 31.012e | 2.976c | |
| 5% | 32.996e | 3.237c | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 37.454d | 3.55c |
| 15% | 38.886d | 3.737c | |
| 20% | 32.762e | 3.224c | |
| Average | 34.62 | 3.34 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 1.17 | 0.118 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 1.85 | 0.187 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 2.616 | 0.25 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05S*FA) for the different soil types at the defefferent FA rates.
Table 7.
Effects of fly ash application on storage-root diameter (cm) and storage-root length (cm) of radish plant under two types of soil.
| Formula |
Storage-root diameter (cm) | Storage-root length (cm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | ||
| 0% | 3.03bc | 12.66d | |
| 5% | 3.15ab | 16.66a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 3.29a | 17.36a |
| 15% | 2.95c | 14.90b | |
| 20% | 2.74d | 14.06c | |
| Average | 3.03 | 15.13 | |
| 0% | 2.15f | 10.24e | |
| 5% | 2.95c | 12.32d | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 2.51e | 13.70c |
| 15% | 2.50e | 12.16d | |
| 20% | 2.16f | 10.46e | |
| Average | 2.45 | 11.78 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 0.719 | 0.326 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 0.14 | 0.515 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 0.161 | 0.729 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05) for the different treatments.
Table 8.
Effects of fly ash (FA) application on storage-root fresh and dry weight (g plant−1) of radish plant under two types of soil (S).
| Formula |
Storage-root fresh weight (g plant−1) | Storage-root dry weight (g plant−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil type | FA rate | ||
| 0% | 64.33c | 4.41c | |
| 5% | 84.91b | 5.99a | |
| Delta clay rich soil | 10% | 110.56a | 9.17a |
| 15% | 65.91c | 4.58c | |
| 20% | 57.91d | 3.59d | |
| Average | 76.72 | 5.55 | |
| 0% | 17.73h | 1.62g | |
| 5% | 57.44d | 3.35e | |
| Coastal sandy soil | 10% | 45.78e | 3.50ed |
| 15% | 40.17f | 2.73f | |
| 20% | 22.07g | 1.80g | |
| Average | 36.64 | 2.60 | |
| LSD0.05(S) | 1.564 | 0.112 | |
| LSD0.05(FA) | 2.473 | 0.177 | |
| LSD0.05(S*FA) | 3.498 | 0.25 | |
Each value is the mean of five replicates. Different letters within the same column indicate the least significant difference values at the 0.05 level (LSD0.05) for the different treatments.
4. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods
4.1. Materials
Radish: White radish variety F1 LONG WHITE is a French radish variety that grows and develops well, has high disease resistance, spoon-shaped leaves, short leaves, and bright green.
Delta clay rich soil: The delta clay-rich soil was taken at the field of Hanoi (latitude 21°0′01N, longitude 105° 9′32″ W). This soil is composed of 45% clay, 1.72% organic matter; 6.0 pH and 23.6 meq/100 g CEC [1].
Coastal sandy soil: Coastal sandy soil was taken from a costal farmland at a depth of 0–30 cm (latitude 17014′00’’and longtitude 106 49′ 00′' East). The characteristics of soil are composed of 97% sandy, 0.18 organic matter, 7.0 pH, and 4.29 meq/100 g CEC [1].
Fly ash (FA): The fly ash recovered from the Mong Duong 2 coal-fired thermal power plant and had the main chemical composition of oxygen (43%), Si (26%), Al (15%), K (9%), and Fe (6%) [2].
4.2. Experimental design and treatments
The experiment was conducted under semi-controlled conditions in a greenhouse at the Faculty of Agronomy, Vietnam National University of Agriculture (latitude 21°0′01N, longitude 105° 9′32″ W). Five kilogrammes of all treatment mixtures were placed into plastic pots (30 × 15 × 20 cm). The experiment has been conducted with the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), each experimental formula was repeated five times. The FA application was used according to Singh et al. [3] as A total of 10 experimental formulas were performed including 100% delta clay rich soil, 95% delta clay rich soil+5% FA, 90% delta clay rich soil+10% FA, 85% delta clay rich soil+15% FA, 80% delta clay rich soil+20% FA, 100% coastal sandy soil, 95% coastal sandy soil+5%FA, 90% coastal sandy soil +10%FA, 85% coastal sandy soil+15%FA, and 80% coastal sandy soil+20%FA. Each experimental pot was supplied fertilizers of 0.81gN, 0.54gP2O5 and 0.54gK2O. Seeds of radish were soaked in fresh water in 3 h. Then five seeds were sown in each pot. At 4 leaves stage, plants were thined to one plant per pot.
4.3. Measurements
The germination rate was recorded at 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th after sowing. Plant height and number of leaves were measured at 11st, 21st, 31st, 41st, 51st, 61st and 71st after sowing. SPAD values were collected at 30th, 42nd, 54th, 66th after sowing. The leaf area, shoot fresh and dry weight, storage-root traits, storage-root fresh and dry weight measured at the harvest stage. Plant height is the height from the tip of the longest leaf. SPAD index using SPAD (Konica-Minolta 502, Japan). Leaf area was calculated by leaf area meter (Li-3100, Lin Coln Nebraska USA). Fresh weight was measured by using electronic balance (OHAUS PR4202, USA). Dry weight of tuber was determined after drying samples at 80 °C for three days in drying chamber (BINDER, USA) until constant weight. Dry samples were weighted by the electronic balance (OHAUS STX-223, USA).
4.4. Data analysis
We used a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the average values among treatments. Least significant difference (LSD) test was used to find the means that were significantly different from each other. Data were analyzed using the IRRISTAT 5.0 software.
Limitations
Not applicable.
Ethics Statement
The authors declare that they confirm that the authors have read and follow the ethical requirements for publication in Data in Brief and confirming that the current work does not involve human subjects, animal experiments, or any data collected from social media platforms.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Van Loc Nguyen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Duc Huy Nguyen: Visualization, Investigation, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the project of Vietnam National University of Agriculture (ID No. T2022-01-04).
Declaration of Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110234.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
Data Availability
References
- 1.Pham D.T., Nguyen H.N.T., Nguyen L.V., Tran O.V., Nguyen A.V., Dinh L.P.T., Vu N.V. Sandy soil reclamation using biochar and clay-rich soil. J. Ecol. Eng. 2021;22:26–35. doi: 10.12911/22998993/137445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tu N., Huy T., Cong V., Ha N., Ha D., Hang H. Study on the application of fly ash for soil amelioration. Vietnam J. Agric. Sci. 2022;5:1551–1562. doi: 10.31817/vjas.2022.5.3.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singh S.N., Kulshreshtha Kamla, Ahmad K.J. Impact of fly ash soil amendment on seed germination, seedling growth and metal composition of Vicia faba L. Ecol. Eng. 1997;9:203–208. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(97)10004-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
