ABSTRACT
Oxacillinases (OXA)-48-like β-lactamases are one of the most common resistance determinants among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales reported globally. Moreover, there is no standard treatment available against organisms producing OXA-48-like enzymes, and they are sometimes difficult to detect, making treatment challenging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates against ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and a panel of comparators collected worldwide from 2016 to 2020 as a part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program. Among all the Enterobacterales isolates collected, 1.8% (1,690/94,052) carried blaOXA-48-like, and a majority of those were identified as K. pneumoniae (86.5%, 1,462/1,690). Among all the blaOXA-48-like isolates, 88.9% (1,502/1,690) were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive, 20.7% (350/1,690) were metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-positive, and 8.9% (150/1,690) were ESBL- and MBL-negative. There were 10 different variants of the OXA-48-like family of enzymes detected, with the major variant being blaOXA-48 (50.2%, 848/1,690), blaOXA-232 (29.3%, 496/1,690), and blaOXA-181 (18.0%, 304/1,690). Overall, all the blaOXA-48-like isolates showed a susceptibility of 78.6% to CAZ-AVI. Importantly, high susceptibility to CAZ-AVI was shown by all the blaOXA-48 type, MBL-negative isolates (n = 1,380, ≥99.0%), and all the MBL-negative isolates (n = 1,300, ≥97.6%) of the major variants (blaOXA-48, blaOXA-232, and blaOXA-181) studied. Among the comparator agents, all isolates showed good susceptibility to only tigecycline (>95.0%) and colistin (>78.6%). Considering the limited treatment options available, CAZ-AVI could be considered as a potential treatment option against blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales. However, routine surveillance and appropriate stewardship strategies for these organisms may help identify emerging resistance mechanisms and effective treatment of infections.
IMPORTANCE
Resistance to carbapenems among Enterobacterales is often due to the production of enzymes that are members of the oxacillinases (OXA)-48-like family. These organisms can also be resistant to other classes of drugs and are difficult to identify and treat. This study evaluated the activity of the drug ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and other comparator agents against a global collection of Enterobacterales that produce OXA-48-like enzymes. CAZ-AVI was active against blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales, and only colistin and tigecycline were similarly active among the comparator agents, highlighting the limited treatment options against these organisms. Continued surveillance of the distribution of these OXA 48-like producing Enterobacterales and monitoring of resistance patterns along with the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship measures to guide antibiotic use and appropriate treatment are necessary to avoid drug resistance among these organisms.
KEYWORDS: antimicrobial susceptibility, ATLAS, ceftazidime–avibactam, Enterobacterales, OXA-48, surveillance
INTRODUCTION
Carbapenems are a class of broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics, initially approved in 1985 (1). These have been used to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria, including Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and ampicillinase-C (1–3). However, overuse of carbapenems led to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs), which was first identified in 1996 (1, 3). Notably, prior to 2001, about 99.9% of Enterobacterales were susceptible to carbapenems (4). CREs have been disseminated worldwide with varying degrees of prevalence (5), with an increase in infection rates of CREs in Europe (1.3/10,000), the United States (2.93/100,000), and China (4/10,000) between 2012 and 2015 (4, 6, 7). Furthermore, a recent global study reported an increase in the prevalence of carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacterales from 3.3% globally between 2012 and 2017 to 5.7% between 2018 and 2019 (8). Infections caused by CREs have been highlighted as a global health threat, with the Wolrd Health Organization (WHO) categorizing them as critical (highest priority) pathogens (9, 10).
Resistance to carbapenems can be mediated by production of carbapenemases belonging to Ambler class A (blaKPC and blaGES), class B [metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)], or class D [oxacillinases (OXA)] β-lactamases (10, 11). Among the resistance determinants of CREs, those carrying metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs, 36.7%), blaKPC (25.5%), and blaOXA-48-like (24.1%) have been shown to be most frequently identified as per a global study assessing distribution between 2018 and 2019 (8). Notably, the resistance mechanisms among CREs vary among the different regions, with predominance of blaNDM reported in Africa and the Middle East (AfME) and Asia Pacific (APAC), blaOXA-48-like in Europe, and blaKPC in Latin America (LATAM) and North America (8). Furthermore, CRE infections are associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality and higher cost (9, 12–14). Two studies assessing the cost associated with CRE infections reported a higher cost: an incidence of 15 per 100,000 costing USD 1.4 billion to the hospitals, USD 0.8 billion to third-party payers, and USD 2.8 billion in the United States (12); and a hospital-associated CRE incidence of 233 per 100,000 costed SGD 12.16 million annually based on direct costs in Singapore (13).
OXA, belonging to class D β-lactamases, are either plasmid-mediated or naturally occurring chromosomally encoded (15). There are several groups of carbapenem-resistant OXA-type β-lactamases, including OXA-23-like, OXA-24/40-like, OXA-51-like, OXA-58-like, and OXA-48-like (16). The OXA-48 enzyme was first identified in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Turkey in 2001 (17). Following that, they were also reported in multiple countries in the Middle East and North Africa, which were important reservoirs for OXA-48-like Enterobacterales (18). Since then, they have been reported as the most common carbapenemases in several regions spreading to non-endemic areas, causing nosocomial outbreaks (19–21). There are currently no standard treatments against infections caused by isolates producing these carbapenemases (21, 22). Furthermore, currently, these bacteria are sometimes difficult to detect due to their lower carbapenem-hydrolyzing ability as compared to other carbapenemases, and as a result, they often do not exceed the level for detection of phenotypic resistance. This delay in detection could lead to treatment errors and is possibly associated with treatment failure (21).
Although extended-spectrum cephalosporins are active against OXA-48-like enzymes, most OXA-48-like enzymes containing bacteria also carry ESBLs, making them resistant to treatment with these cephalosporins (21). Ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a combination of ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin and avibactam, and a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor (23). CAZ-AVI has been shown to be active against blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales, including those carrying ESBLs (20, 21, 24). However, CAZ-AVI is not active against organisms that produce MBLs (25). This activity of CAZ-AVI is attributed to the activity of avibactam against ambler class A, class C, and some class D β-lactamases but not class B (26). The addition of avibactam to ceftazidime expands the Gram-negative spectrum of activity to include multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, those producing ESBLs and non-MBLs (26).
Due to the increasing incidence, limited treatment options, and challenges in detection of Enterobacterales producing OXA-48-like carbapenemases, it is important to continue monitoring the distribution and resistance patterns of these isolates to establish appropriate antibiotic stewardship strategies for the management of infections caused by these organisms. A previous study, which was a part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program, reported the distribution and susceptibility of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates to CAZ-AVI, collected between 2012 and 2015 from Africa and the Middle East (AfME), Asia Pacific (APAC), Europe, and Latin America (LATAM). The study reported that CAZ-AVI demonstrated good activity (susceptibility 89.7%, MIC90 >128 mg/L) against blaOXA-48-like isolates, with potent activity (susceptibility 100%, MIC90 4 mg/L) against the MBL-negative isolates (25). The current study provides an update to the previous study and aims to evaluate the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates collected worldwide (AfME, APAC, Europe, LATAM, and North America) in 2016–2020 from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program (27) against CAZ-AVI and a panel of comparator agents.
RESULTS
A total of 94,052 Enterobacterales isolates were collected from 320 sites in 60 countries between 2016 and 2020 (Fig. 1; Table S2). Most of the isolates were identified as Escherichia coli, 29,274 (31.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae, 26,510 (28.2%; Table 1).
Fig 1.
Distribution of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates collected globally and across different regions in 2016–2020. N, total number of Enterobacterales collected; n, number of blaOXA-48-like isolates. The number of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales identified globally among all Enterobacterales isolates collected was 1690. These isolates were identified from AfME (n = 220), APAC (n = 598), Europe (n = 812), LATAM (n = 49), and North America (n = 11).
TABLE 1.
Distribution of blaOXA-48-like-carrying isolates among different organisms of Enterobacterales collected globally in 2016–2020e
| Organisms [n (% of N)] |
All organisms (N = 94,052) |
OXA-48-like (N = 1,690) |
|---|---|---|
| Escherichia coli | 29,274 (31.1%) |
107 (6.3%) |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 26,510 (28.2%) |
1,462 (86.5%) |
| Enterobacter cloacae | 7,117 (7.6%) |
43 (2.5%) |
| Citrobacter spp. | 5,879 (6.3%) |
17 (1.0%) |
| Enterobacter spp.a | 1,002 (1.1%) |
1 (0.1%) |
| Klebsiella spp.b | 8,899 (9.5%) |
17 (1.0%) |
| Proteus spp. | 6,138 (6.5%) |
5 (0.3%) |
| Serratia spp. | 4,030 (4.3%) |
9 (0.5%) |
| Morganella morganii | 2,865 (3.0%) |
1 (0.1%) |
| Providencia spp. | 2,139 (2.3%) |
27 (1.6%) |
| Othersc,d | 145 (0.2%) |
1 (0.1%) |
Excludes isolates of E. cloacae.
Excludes isolates of K. pneumoniae.
Other organisms among all organisms include Raoultella spp. (n = 117), Pluralibacter gergoviae (n = 12), Pantoea spp. (n = 9), Cronobacter sakazakii (n = 2), Lelliottia amnigena (n = 2), Escherichia vulneris (n = 1), Hafnia alvei (n = 1), and Kluyvera ascorbate (n = 1).
Other organisms among OXA-48‑like Enterobacterales include Raoultella spp. (n = 1).
N, total number of isolates; n, number of isolates of each organism.
Globally, 1.8% (1,690/94,052) of all Enterobacterales were blaOXA-48-like (Fig. 1; Table S2). The majority of blaOXA-48-like isolates were identified as K. pneumoniae (86.5%, 1,462/1,690; Table 1). Among the different geographical regions, Enterobacterales isolates collected in APAC had the highest proportion of blaOXA-48-like β-lactamases (3.1%, 598/19,284), and those collected in North America had the lowest (0.1%, 11/10,378; Fig. 1; Table S2). Among all the blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates, 88.9% (1,502/1,690) were ESBL-positive, 20.7% (350/1,690) were MBL-positive, and 8.9% (150/1,690) were ESBL- and MBL-negative (Fig. 2A; Table S2). There were 10 different variants of the OXA-48-like family of enzymes detected among the Enterobacterales isolates. Among these, the highest proportion carried blaOXA-48 (50.2%, 848/1,690), followed by blaOXA-32 (29.3%, 496/1,690) and blaOXA-181 (18.0%, 304/1,690). Among the different geographical regions, the proportion of blaOXA-48 proper was the highest among isolates collected in Europe (89.2%, 724/812), followed by North America (54.5%, 6/11); a similar proportion of isolates in AfME carried blaOXA-48 (40.0%, 88/220) and blaOXA-181 (45.5%, 100/220), and blaOXA-232 was the most common variant among blaOXA-48-like isolates in APAC (65.6%, 392/598) and LATAM (38.8%, 19/49; Fig. 2B; Table S3).
Fig 2.
Distribution of blaOXA-48-like, ESBL, and blaOXA-48-like variants among Enterobacterales collected globally and across different regions in 2016–2020. AfME, Africa and Middle East; APAC, Asia Pacific; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase LATAM, Latin America; MBL, metallo-β-lactamase; N, total number of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales collected. (A) Distribution of blaOXA-48-like, ESBL Enterobacterales isolates collected globally and across different regions in 2016–2020. The number of isolates collected globally was ESBL (−), MBL (−), n = 150 (AfME, n = 29; APAC, n = 16; Europe, n = 99; LATAM, n = 5; North America n = 1); ESBL (+), MBL (−), n = 1190 (AfME, n = 172; APAC, n = 308; Europe, n = 666; LATAM, n = 40; North America n = 4); ESBL (−), MBL (+), n = 38 (AfME, n = 4; APAC, n = 24; Europe, n = 7; LATAM, n = 1; North America n = 2); ESBL (+), MBL (+), n = 312 (AfME, n = 15; APAC, n = 250; Europe, n = 40; LATAM, n = 3; North America n = 4). (B) Distribution of blaOXA-48-like variants among Enterobacterales collected globally and across different regions in 2016–2020. Total number of isolates of variants collected included the following: OXA-48, n = 848 (AfME, n = 88; APAC, n = 20; Europe, n = 724; LATAM, n = 10; North America, n = 6); OXA-232, n = 496 (AfME, n = 32; APAC, n = 392; Europe, n = 51; LATAM, n = 19; North America, n = 2); OXA-181, n = 304 (AfME, n = 100; APAC, n = 182; Europe, n = 16; LATAM, n = 3; North America, n = 3); others, n = 42. *Others include OXA-244 (n = 17, n = 1 in APAC, and n = 16 in Europe), OXA-163 (n = 12 in LATAM), OXA-162 (n = 5 in Europe), OXA-370 (n = 5 in LATAM), OXA-484 (n = 1 in APAC), OXA-48-TYPE (n = 1 in APAC), and OXA-48-new variant (n = 1 in APAC).
Antibiotic susceptibility for CAZ-AVI against all blaOXA-48-like isolates was 78.6% with an MIC90 of >128 mg/L (Table 2). Importantly, CAZ-AVI showed high antimicrobial activity against the MBL-negative isolates, including OXA-48-like, MBL (−), ESBL (±) (susceptibility, 99.0%; MIC90, 2 mg/L) and OX-48-like, ESBL (+), MBL (−) isolates (susceptibility, 99.1%, MIC90, 2 mg/L). Among the comparator agents, only tigecycline (susceptibility, 94.0%–96.0%; MIC90, 2 mg/L) and colistin (susceptibility, 81.8%–84.0%; MIC90, >8 mg/L) were active against all the isolates (Table 3).
TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates collected globally in 2016–2020c
| %S | %R | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1690 | |||||
| Amikacin | 56.1 | 39.5 | 8 | >64 | 0.25–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 9.5 | 89.5 | >64 | >128 | 0.03–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 78.6 | 21.4 | 1 | >128 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 6.9 | 87.9 | >32 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 81.9 | 18.1 | 0.5 | >8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 10.4 | 76.4 | 8 | >8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Meropenem | 17 | 71.5 | 16 | >16 | 0.015–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 0.9 | 98.9 | >64 | >128 | 0.25–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 95.5 | 5.3 | 1 | 2 | 0.06–>8 |
EUCAST breakpoints have been used.
FDA-approved breakpoints have been used.
N, total number of isolates; S, susceptibility; R, resistance; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime–avibactam; Pip/taz, piperacillin/tazobactam.
TABLE 3.
Antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against blaOXA-48-like. ESBL Enterobacterales isolates collected globally in 2016–2020c
| %S | %R | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| blaOXA-48-Like, ESBL (−), MBL (−) (N = 150) | |||||
| Amikacin | 76.0 | 20.0 | 2 | >64 | 0.5–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 75.3 | 20.1 | 0.25 | 32 | 0.03–128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 98.7 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 66.0 | 7.3 | 2 | 8 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 84.0 | 16.0 | 0.5 | >8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 30.0 | 44.0 | 4 | >8 | 0.25–>8 |
| Meropenem | 45.3 | 40.0 | 4 | >16 | 0.03–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 6.7 | 99.3 | >64 | >128 | 8–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 94.0 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.06–8 |
| blaOXA-48-Like, ESBL (+), MBL (−) (N = 1190) | |||||
| Amikacin | 64.6 | 30.7 | 4 | >64 | 0.25–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 1.8 | 97.5 | 128 | >128 | 0.12–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 99.1 | 0.9 | 1 | 2 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 1.4 | 94.8 | >32 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 81.8 | 18.2 | 0.5 | >8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 29.4 | 50.2 | 8 | >8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Meropenem | 22.5 | 65.5 | >8 | >16 | 0.015–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 1.0 | 98.7 | >64 | >128 | 0.25–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 96.0 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.06–>8 |
| blaOXA-48-Like, ESBL (±), MBL (−) (N = 1340) | |||||
| Amikacin | 65.9 | 32.3 | 4 | >64 | 0.25–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 10.0 | 88.9 | 128 | >128 | 0.03–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 99.0 | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 8.7 | 85.0 | >32 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 82.0 | 18.0 | 0.5 | >8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 12.9 | 70.5 | 4 | >8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Meropenem | 21.3 | 64.3 | >8 | >16 | 0.015–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 1.0 | 98.7 | >64 | >128 | 0.25–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 95.8 | 0.6 | 1 | 2 | 0.06–>8 |
EUCAST breakpoints have been used.
FDA-approved breakpoints have been used.
N, total number of isolates; S, susceptibility; R, resistance; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime–avibactam; Pip/taz, piperacillin/tazobactam; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; MBL, metallo-β-lactamase.
Against the major variants of blaOXA-48-like isolates, CAZ-AVI showed good activity against blaOXA-48 isolates (susceptibility, 91.9%; MIC90, 2 mg/L) but lower activity against blaOXA-181 (susceptibility, 60.2%; MIC90, 8 mg/L) and blaOXA-232 isolates (susceptibility, 65.7%; MIC90, >128 mg/L mg/L). However, when the MBL-producing isolates were removed from the data set, CAZ-AVI showed good antimicrobial activity against all three blaOXA-48-like variants (susceptibility, 97.6%-99.5%; MIC90, 2 mg/L). Among the comparator agents, tigecycline showed good antimicrobial activity against all the variants (susceptibility, 91.9%–97%; MIC90, 2 mg/L). Colistin showed good antimicrobial activity against all blaOXA-181 (susceptibility, 86.8%; MIC90, 8 mg/L) and blaOXA-232 isolates (susceptibility, 84.7%; MIC90, 8 mg/L; Table 4).
TABLE 4.
Antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against variants of blaOXA-48l-like Enterobacterales isolates collected globally in 2016–2020c
| %S | %R | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| blaOXA-48 (N = 848) | |||||
| Amikacin | 76.1 | 18.0 | 4 | >64 | 0.25–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 13.1 | 86.0 | 128 | >128 | 0.03–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 91.9 | 8.1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 11.7 | 81.7 | 32 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 78.7 | 21.3 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 9.0 | 71.1 | 4 | 8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Meropenem | 38.6 | 49.1 | >16 | >16 | 0.06–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 1.1 | 98.7 | >64 | >128 | 0.25–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 95.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.06–8 |
| blaOXA-48, MBL (−) (N = 783) | |||||
| Amikacin | 79.2 | 20.8 | 4 | >64 | 0.25–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 13.2 | 86.0 | 128 | >128 | 0.03–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 99.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 12.6 | 80.3 | >16 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 78.9 | 21.0 | 0.5 | >8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 9.7 | 68.8 | 4 | >8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Meropenem | 20.7 | 58.2 | 2 | >16 | 0.015–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 1.2 | 98.6 | >64 | >128 | 0.25–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 95.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.06–8 |
| blaOXA-181 (N = 304) | |||||
| Amikacin | 51.6 | 46.4 | 16 | >64 | 0.5–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 6.6 | 91.8 | >64 | >128 | 0.03–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 60.2 | 39.8 | 2 | >128 | 0.06–>128 |
| Cefepime | 4.0 | 92.1 | >32 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 86.8 | 13.2 | 0.25 | 8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 28.6 | 62.5 | >8 | >8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Meropenem | 30.6 | 67.8 | >16 | >16 | 0.06–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 0.3 | 99.0 | >64 | >128 | 2–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 92.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.06–>8 |
| blaOXA-181, MBL (−) (N = 184) | |||||
| Amikacin | 78.8 | 19.0 | 4 | >64 | 0.5–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 7.1 | 91.3 | >64 | >128 | 0.12–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 99.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 0.06–64 |
| Cefepime | 6.0 | 87.5 | >32 | >32 | 0.12–>32 |
| Colistina | 91.3 | 8.7 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.06–>8 |
| Imipenem | 26.1 | 52.7 | 4 | >8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Meropenem | 39.6 | 49.5 | 2 | >16 | 0.06–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 0.0 | 98.9 | >64 | >128 | 16–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 91.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.06–>8 |
| blaOXA-232 (N = 496) | |||||
| Amikacin | 23.4 | 73.4 | >64 | >64 | 0.25–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 4.6 | 95.2 | >64 | >128 | 0.12–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 65.7 | 34.3 | 1 | >128 | 0.03–>128 |
| Cefepime | 0.4 | 96.6 | >32 | >32 | 2–>32 |
| Colistina | 84.7 | 15.3 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Imipenem | 8.3 | 81.7 | 8 | ≥8 | 0.06–>8 |
| Meropenem | 6.1 | 92.7 | >16 | >16 | 0.25–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 0.4 | 99.6 | >64 | >128 | 2–>128 |
| Tigecycline | 97.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 4.0–8 |
| blaOXA-232, MBL (−) (N = 333) | |||||
| Amikacin | 26.4 | 73.0 | >64 | >64 | 1–>64 |
| Aztreonam | 3.9 | 95.8 | >64 | >128 | 0.12–>128 |
| CAZ-AVI | 97.6 | 2.4 | 1 | 2 | 0.015–>128 |
| Cefepime | 0.6 | 95.2 | >32 | >32 | 2–>32 |
| Colistina | 84.4 | 15.6 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.12–>8 |
| Imipenem | 9.3 | 88.3 | 8 | >8 | 0.5–>8 |
| Meropenem | 8.4 | 89.8 | >16 | >16 | 0.25–>16 |
| Pip/Taz | 0.3 | 99.7 | >64 | >64 | 1–>128 |
| Tigecyclineb | 97.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 0.12–10 |
EUCAST breakpoints have been used.
FDA-approved breakpoints have been used.
N, total number of isolates; S, susceptibility; R, resistance; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime–avibactam; Pip/taz, piperacillin/tazobactam; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; MBL, metallo-β-lactamase.
DISCUSSION
This study assessed the distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates against CAZ-AVI and a panel of comparator agents collected globally from 2016 to 2020. Among all the Enterobacterales isolates collected, 1.8% carried blaOXA-48-like β-lactamases, with the majority of the isolates (86.5%) identified as K. pneumoniae. Majority of the blaOXA-48-like isolates co-carried ESBLs (88.9%). Of note, 10 different variants of blaOXA-48-like β-lactamases were detected among Enterobacterales, with blaOXA-48 (50.2%), blaOXA-232 (29.3%), and blaOXA-181 (18.0%) being the most common. Overall, blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales showed good susceptibility to CAZ-AVI (78.6%). For MBL-negative blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales, CAZ-AVI showed potent antimicrobial activity (susceptibility, 99.0%; MIC90 2 mg/L). Among the comparator agents, tigecycline and colistin were the only agents that were active against all blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales.
Our study identified 1.8% of all Enterobacterales isolates collected as blaOXA-48-like. The INFORM study, which included isolates collected between 2012 and 2015, had identified 0.73% of all isolates as blaOXA-48-like (25). However, the previous study did not include isolates collected in North America. In the current study, only a small (0.7%, 11/1,690) proportion of the total blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates collected were in North America. Our study revealed that 8.9% of all the blaOXA-48-like isolates did not co-carry any other β-lactamases (ESBL-negative; MBL-negative), which is a reduction from the 13.8% reported in the previous INFORM study. Accordingly, there was an increase in the proportion of blaOXA-48-like isolates co-carrying ESBLs (2016–2020 vs 2012–2015, 88.9% vs 77.5%) or MBLs (20.7% vs 9.0%) (25).
Among the variants of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales, a majority of them were blaOXA-48 (50.2%, 848/1,690). OXA-48 has been reported as the most abundant OXA-48-like enzyme, globally (19). In this study, a majority of the blaOXA-48 isolates collected globally were from Europe (85.4%, 724/848), followed by AfME (10.4%, 88/848; Fig. 2B; Table S3). Furthermore, Russia (27.6%, 200/724), Turkey (21.2%, 154/724), and Spain (15.3%, 111/724) in Europe and Morocco (42.0%, 37/88) and South Africa (15.9%, 14/88; data not shown) in AfME contributed most of the blaOXA-48 isolates. Turkey and Morocco have been reported to be endemic for blaOXA-48-carrying Enterobacterales with subsequent reports in Spain and South Africa after early nosocomial outbreaks, which are in line with the findings of our study (19). Notably, increasing prevalence and spread of blaOXA-48-carrying Enterobacterales in Russia have been reported in a previous global surveillance study in which the highest number of OXA-48-producing isolates were from Russia in 2018 (28). In the current study, blaOXA-232 (29.3%, 496/1,690), and blaOXA-181 (18.0%, 304/1,690) were the other variants frequently identified. However, OXA-181 was previously reported to be more frequent than OXA-232 (19). Furthermore, in the previous INFORM study, while blaOXA-48 was the most common variant (79.6%), other major variants detected were blaOXA-181 (7.5%), blaOXA-163 (3.9%), blaOXA-232 (3.6%), and blaOXA-244 (3.6%) (25). A majority of the blaOXA-232 were collected in APAC (79.0%, 392/496) and Europe (10.3%, 51/496), while those of blaOXA-181 were collected in APAC (59.9%, 182/304) and AfME (32.9%, 100/304). Both OXA-181 and OXA-232 have been reported to be endemic to India, which supports the findings of the current study in which 69.4% (344/496) of blaOXA-232 and 59.2% (160/304) of blaOXA-181 were collected in India (data not shown) (19). Thailand (9.5%, 47/496) and Turkey (7.7%, 38/496) were the other major contributors of blaOXA-232 isolates in our study (data not shown). Notably, OXA-232 has been reported in Thailand and Europe since 2015 (19). South Africa was the other major contributor of blaOXA-181 (27.6%, 84/304; data not shown), which has been previously reported (19).
Our study demonstrated high susceptibility (>99.0%, Table 4) to CAZ-AVI against all the blaOXA-48-like, MBL (−), ESBL (±) and the ESBL (+), MBL (−) isolates, which was similar to the susceptibility (>99.2%) among those collected in 2012–2015 (25). In the current study, CAZ-AVI was active against all isolates of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales (78.6%, Table 4). Comparatively higher susceptibility to CAZ-AVI was reported in the INFORM study (89.3%–92.5%) (25). In the current study, CAZ-AVI showed very low activity (susceptibility, ≤0.3%; MIC90, >128 mg/L; Table S2) against blaOXA-48-like, MBL (+), ESBL (±) Enterobacterales isolates, which is expected as avibactam has no inhibitory activity against MBLs (24). However, to overcome the lack of activity of avibactam against MBL-positive Enterobacterales, the addition of aztreonam to CAZ-AVI has been proposed as a therapeutic combination (29). In line with our current finding that CAZ-AVI was active against MBL-negative isolates, the overall reduced susceptibility of all blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates to CAZ-AVI, as compared to the previous INFORM study, could be attributed to the increase in the proportion of blaOXA-48-like isolates co-carrying MBLs in the current study (25). Taken together, while CAZ-AVI still presents a potential treatment option against these isolates, the rise in the proportion of isolates co-carrying MBLs that trigger CAZ-AVI resistance is of serious concern.
Among the major blaOXA-48-like variants, all isolates-carrying blaOXA-48 showed high susceptibility (91.9%) to CAZ-AVI as compared to those carrying blaOXA-232 (65.7%) and blaOXA-181 (60.2%). In the previous INFORM study, the overall susceptibility of blaOXA-48 type isolates to CAZ-AVI (92.5%) was in line with that reported in this study. However, all isolates of blaOXA-181 and 41.7% of blaOXA-232 were susceptible to CAZ-AVI in the previous study (25). Importantly, MBL-negative isolates of all the three major variants assessed in the current study showed high susceptibility (>97.6%) to CAZ-AVI. These data are corroborated by the previous INFORM study in which MBL-negative isolates of the three blaOXA-48-like variants showed high susceptibility (>99.2%) to CAZ-AVI. Notably, MBL co-carriage was high among blaOXA-232 (32.9%)- and blaOXA-181 (39.5%)-carrying isolates, indicating that the lower susceptibility to CAZ-AVI among these variants is likely due to the presence of MBL genes (Table S3).
Among the comparator agents, only tigecycline (susceptibility, >94.0%; MIC90, 2 mg/L) and colistin (susceptibility, >78.7%; MIC90, ≤8 mg/L) were active against all the blaOXA-48-like isolates. These data are in agreement with those of the previous INFORM study where tigecycline (susceptibility, ≥92.5%; MIC90, 2 mg/L) and colistin (susceptibility, ≥78.7%; MIC90, ≤4 mg/L) were the only comparator agents active against all the blaOXA-48-like isolates (25).
In a clinical study by Caston et al., treatment with CAZ-AVI was shown to have a significantly higher clinical cure rate at 14 days than that with comparator agents (85.7% vs 34.8%) in patients infected with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales, where majority of the infections were associated with OXA-48 producers (30). Furthermore, for infections caused by OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales, salvage therapy with CAZ-AVI has been shown to have a 61.5% clinical cure rate (31). Colistin and tigecycline monotherapies and combination therapies have been used to treat infections caused by OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales (31). The 2023 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidance on treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections recommends CAZ-AVI as the preferred treatment option for OXA-48-like-producing infections other than those of the urinary tract (32). Furthermore, the IDSA recommends tigecycline as an alternative treatment of infections caused by OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales excluding bloodstream infections and urinary tract infections (32). On the other hand, colistin is not suggested for treatment of infections caused by CRE due to increased mortality and nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin-based regimens (32).
This study had limitations. First, as a pre-defined number of isolates were collected from each site, the results of this study cannot be interpreted as prevalence or used for epidemiological data. Second, there was a variation in the number of participating centers between years as well as the distribution of centers in each region. Third, the β-lactamase screening criteria were altered in 2015 to exclude the characterization of isolates that tested as imipenem or doripenem non-susceptible but only meropenem-susceptible (25). Hence, some isolates that were non-susceptible to the other carbapenemases could have been excluded from the screening. Although the majority of blaOXA-48-like isolates co-carried an ESBL and isolates resistant to ceftazidime (MIC >8 µg/mL) were also screened for β-lactamase genes, some meropenem-susceptible isolates that did not co-carry ceftazidime-hydrolyzing β-lactamases could have been omitted from this analysis.
In this study, CAZ-AVI was highly active against all MBL-negative, blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales isolates collected from 2016 to 2020 with sustained activity from the previous time period (2012–2015). However, the overall increase in the geographic spread of blaOXA-48-like Enterobacterales and those co-carrying MBLs is concerning, especially with currently available limited treatment options. Considering the limited treatment options against OXA-48-like Enterobacterales and the challenges of toxicity and increasing resistance with tigecycline and colistin, CAZ-AVI could be considered as a potential treatment option. Routine surveillance of these clinically relevant isolates and appropriate stewardship strategies may help identify emerging resistance mechanisms and effective treatment of infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Non-duplicate, clinically significant isolates (single isolate per patient) of Enterobacterales independent of age, sex, previous antimicrobial use, or medical history were collected in different sites across regions worldwide (AfME, APAC, Europe, LATAM, and North America) from patients between 2016 and 2020. Each site collected a pre-defined number of Enterobacterales isolates that were shipped to a central reference laboratory for (International Health Management Associates, Inc. Schaumburg, IL, USA) species conformation and antimicrobial susceptibility. Species confirmation was done using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight spectrometry (Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA).
Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (33). Minimum-inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all Enterobacterales were determined for CAZ-AVI, and a panel of comparator antimicrobial agents: amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin–tazobactam (Pip/Taz), and tigecycline and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines except tigecycline for which Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved breakpoints were used, and colistin, for which the version 12.0 of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoint tables (34) was used. For MIC testing of CAZ-AVI, avibactam was fixed at a concentration of 4 mg/L in combination with doubling dilutions of ceftazidime (range, 0.015 mg/L to 256 mg/L).
All Enterobacteriaceae isolates that tested as nonsusceptible to meropenem (MICs, >1 mg/L), as well as E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, K. variicola, and P. mirabilis isolates testing with ceftazidime and/or aztreonam (MICs, ≥2 mg/L) were screened for the presence of genes encoding blaOXA-48-like and other β-lactamases (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaVIM, blaSPM, blaGIM, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaVEB, blaPER, blaGES, blaACC, blaACT, blaCMY, blaDHA, blaFOX, blaMIR, and blaMOX) using multiplex PCR, followed by amplification and sequencing of the full-length genes and comparison to publicly available databases as described previously (25). Isolates were considered genotypically MBL-positive if they had at least one of the genes: blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaNDM. Isolates that did not have any of the three genes were considered MBL-negative.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc.
E.U. and G.S. are employees of Pfizer and hold stock/stock options. M.W. is an employee of IHMA, which received funding from Pfizer to manage the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program.
Under the direction of the authors, Arjun Krishnakumar (Ph.D., CMPPTM), an employee of Pfizer, drafted the initial version of the manuscript, edited subsequent versions, and prepared the manuscript for submission. Editorial support was provided by Sweta Samantaray (Ph.D.), an employee of Pfizer.
Contributor Information
Eric Utt, Email: eric.a.utt@pfizer.com.
Arryn Craney, Petrified Bugs LLC, Miami, Florida, USA.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01473-23.
Tables S1 to S5.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Caliskan-Aydogan O, Alocilja EC. 2023. A review of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales and its detection techniques. Microorganisms 11:1491. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rabaan AA, Eljaaly K, Alhumaid S, Albayat H, Al-Adsani W, Sabour AA, Alshiekheid MA, Al-Jishi JM, Khamis F, Alwarthan S, Alhajri M, Alfaraj AH, Tombuloglu H, Garout M, Alabdullah DM, Mohammed EAE, Yami FSA, Almuhtaresh HA, Livias KA, Mutair AA, Almushrif SA, Abusalah M, Ahmed N. 2022. An overview on phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. Medicina (Kaunas) 58:1675. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Suay-García B, Pérez-Gracia MT. 2019. Present and future of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 8:122. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sader HS, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. 2003. Global patterns of susceptibility for 21 commonly utilized antimicrobial agents tested against 48,440 Enterobacteriaceae in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1997-2001). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 47:361–364. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00052-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ma J, Song X, Li M, Yu Z, Cheng W, Yu Z, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Shen A, Sun H, Li L. 2023. Global spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: epidemiological features, resistance mechanisms, detection and therapy. Microbiol Res 266:127249. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Grundmann H, Glasner C, Albiger B, Aanensen DM, Tomlinson CT, Andrasević AT, Cantón R, Carmeli Y, Friedrich AW, Giske CG, Glupczynski Y, Gniadkowski M, Livermore DM, Nordmann P, Poirel L, Rossolini GM, Seifert H, Vatopoulos A, Walsh T, Woodford N, Monnet DL, European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) Working Group . 2017. Occurrence of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in the European survey of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE): a prospective, multinational study. Lancet Infect Dis 17:153–163. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30257-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Guh AY, Bulens SN, Mu Y, Jacob JT, Reno J, Scott J, Wilson LE, Vaeth E, Lynfield R, Shaw KM, Vagnone PMS, Bamberg WM, Janelle SJ, Dumyati G, Concannon C, Beldavs Z, Cunningham M, Cassidy PM, Phipps EC, Kenslow N, Travis T, Lonsway D, Rasheed JK, Limbago BM, Kallen AJ. 2015. Epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in 7 US communities, 2012-2013. JAMA 314:1479–1487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Estabrook M, Muyldermans A, Sahm D, Pierard D, Stone G, Utt E. 2023. Epidemiology of resistance determinants identified in meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales collected as part of a global surveillance study, 2018 to 2019. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 67:e0140622. doi: 10.1128/aac.01406-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Nordmann P, Poirel L. 2019. Epidemiology and diagnostics of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 69:S521–S528. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. van Duin D, Doi Y. 2017. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence 8:460–469. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kazmierczak KM, Karlowsky JA, de Jonge BLM, Stone GG, Sahm DF. 2021. Epidemiology of carbapenem resistance determinants identified in meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales collected as part of a global surveillance program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e0200020. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02000-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bartsch SM, McKinnell JA, Mueller LE, Miller LG, Gohil SK, Huang SS, Lee BY. 2017. Potential economic burden of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in the United States. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:48. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cai Y, Hoo GSR, Lee W, Tan BH, Yoong J, Teo Y-Y, Graves N, Lye D, Kwa AL, Shakya M. 2022. Estimating the economic cost of carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales healthcare associated infections in Singapore acute-care hospitals. PLOS Glob Public Health 2:e0001311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhou R, Fang X, Zhang J, Zheng X, Shangguan S, Chen S, Shen Y, Liu Z, Li J, Zhang R, Shen J, Walsh TR, Wang Y. 2021. Impact of carbapenem resistance on mortality in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 11:e054971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Héritier C, Poirel L, Fournier P-E, Claverie J-M, Raoult D, Nordmann P. 2005. Characterization of the naturally occurring oxacillinase of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:4174–4179. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4174-4179.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Evans BA, Amyes SGB. 2014. OXA β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:241–263. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00117-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Poirel L, Héritier C, Tolün V, Nordmann P. 2004. Emergence of oxacillinase-mediated resistance to imipenem in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:15–22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.15-22.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Poirel L, Potron A, Nordmann P. 2012. OXA-48-like carbapenemases: the phantom menace. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1597–1606. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pitout JDD, Peirano G, Kock MM, Strydom KA, Matsumura Y. 2019. The global ascendency of OXA-48-type carbapenemases. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00102-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00102-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rivera-Izquierdo M, Láinez-Ramos-Bossini AJ, Rivera-Izquierdo C, López-Gómez J, Fernández-Martínez NF, Redruello-Guerrero P, Martín-delosReyes LM, Martínez-Ruiz V, Moreno-Roldán E, Jiménez-Mejías E. 2021. OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Spanish hospitals: an updated comprehensive review on a rising antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics (Basel) 10:89. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kidd JM, Livermore DM, Nicolau DP. 2020. The difficulties of identifying and treating Enterobacterales with OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:401–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hughes S, Gilchrist M, Heard K, Hamilton R, Sneddon J. 2020. Treating infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE): a pragmatic approach to antimicrobial stewardship on behalf of the UKCPA pharmacy infection network (PIN). JAC Antimicrob Resist 2:dlaa075. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zasowski EJ, Rybak JM, Rybak MJ. 2015. The β-lactams strike back: ceftazidime-avibactam. Pharmacotherapy 35:755–770. doi: 10.1002/phar.1622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wang Y, Wang J, Wang R, Cai Y. 2020. Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and underlying mechanisms. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 22:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kazmierczak KM, Bradford PA, Stone GG, de Jonge BLM, Sahm DF. 2018. In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against OXA-48-carrying Enterobacteriaceae isolated as part of the international network for optimal resistance monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program from 2012 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00592-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00592-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Nichols WW, Newell P, Critchley IA, Riccobene T, Das S. 2018. Avibactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02446-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02446-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pfizer . Antimicrobial testing leadership and surveillance (ATLAS). Available from: https://atlas-surveillance.com. Retrieved 18 Oct 2022.
- 28. Castanheira M, Doyle TB, Collingsworth TD, Sader HS, Mendes RE. 2021. Increasing frequency of OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales worldwide and activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and comparators against these isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:3125–3134. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Marshall S, Hujer AM, Rojas LJ, Papp-Wallace KM, Humphries RM, Spellberg B, Hujer KM, Marshall EK, Rudin SD, Perez F, Wilson BM, Wasserman RB, Chikowski L, Paterson DL, Vila AJ, van Duin D, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF, Fowler VG, Jacobs MR, Pulse ME, Weiss WJ, Bonomo RA. 2017. Can ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam overcome β-lactam resistance conferred by metallo-β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae? Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02243-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02243-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Castón JJ, Lacort-Peralta I, Martín-Dávila P, Loeches B, Tabares S, Temkin L, Torre-Cisneros J, Paño-Pardo JR. 2017. Clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam versus other active agents for the treatment of bacteremia due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hematologic patients. Int J Infect Dis 59:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Stewart A, Harris P, Henderson A, Paterson D. 2018. Treatment of infections by OXA-48-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01195-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01195-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. 2023. Infectious diseases society of America 2023 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial resistant Gram-negative infections. Clin Infect Dis:ciad428. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. CLSI . 2022. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 32 ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar]
- 34. EUCAST . 2022. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. version 12.0 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Tables S1 to S5.


