Abstract
Scheuermann kyphosis can be treated surgically to restore proper sagittal alignment. Thoracic curves >70° are typically indicated for surgical intervention. However, patients who have reached their natural limit of compensatory lumbar hyperlordosis are at risk of accelerated degeneration. This can be determined by comparing lumbar lordosis on standing neutral radiographs and supine extension radiographs. Minimal additional lordosis in extension compared with neutral, abutment of the spinous processes, or greater lumbar lordosis standing than with attempted extension suggest the patient is maximally compensated. We present a case of an adolescent boy with Scheuermann kyphosis who had reached the limit of his hyperlordosis compensation reserve. He subsequently underwent a T4 to L2 posterior spinal fusion with T7 to T11 Ponte Smith-Petersen grade two osteotomies. He tolerated the procedure well with no intraoperative complications or neuromonitoring changes. The patient has continued to do well and progressed to normal activity at 5-month follow-up.
Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) was described by Scheuermann1 as disturbances in the vertebral epiphyses with wedge-shaped vertebral bodies and pathology resembling Calvé-Perthes osteochondritis. SK can be primarily thoracic or thoracolumbar based on the apex of the kyphosis.2 The incidence of SK is relatively high, with rates up to 7.4%.2 It is thought to be multifactorial with a genetic component and is a common cause of structural hyperkyphosis in the pediatric population.3
Normative values of thoracic kyphosis (TK) reported in the literature range considerably (10 to 55°).4-8 Diagnosis of SK is made using Sorensen criteria: anterior wedging of >5° in >3 adjacent vertebrae and TK > 40° or thoracolumbar kyphosis >30°.9 Vertebral end plate irregularities and Schmorl nodes are commonly seen, but not necessarily in atypical SK.9
There are several accepted surgical indications for SK. While there is substantial variability in the literature regarding the threshold for surgery in terms of the degree of kyphotic deformity (50 to 80°), most agree that curves >70° should be treated surgically.10-19 Neurologic deficits, pain refractory to conservative management, cardiopulmonary compromise, and patient dissatisfaction with their appearance are also established indications.
There is often compensatory hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine in patients with SK to maintain sagittal balance. However, once the limit of lordosis is reached, patients cannot compensate for additional progression of their SK, and positive sagittal balance may occur. This has been associated with worse health-related quality of life in adults20 and may accelerate degenerative disease in the lumbar spine.11 To determine compensatory lordosis reserve, lumbar lordosis (LL) is measured on standing neutral and supine hyperextension radiographs. If they are nearly equal, it signifies that the patient has reached their natural limit of compensation. The senior author has noted that standing LL may actually be higher than LL in attempted supine extension, likely because of a loading effect. This proposed surgical indication has not been described in the literature.
We present an adolescent boy with SK and no remaining compensatory LL reserve who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Ponte Smith-Petersen grade two osteotomies (SPO).
Case Presentation
A 16-year-old boy with SK was referred to spine clinic for evaluation. He denied any symptoms and had no prior treatment, but was discontent with his appearance because of the deformity. Physical examination demonstrated increased TK and LL, with neutral standing sagittal balance.
Full-spine radiographic measurements included pelvic incidence (PI) 46°, T4 to T12 TK 77°, LL −79°, and T1 to T12 angle 89° (Figures 1 and 2). Lumbar flexion/extension images showed LL was −72° in extension with close approximation of the spinous processes and gapping of the L4 to 5 facet joint due to spinal hyperextension (Figure 3). Lumbar lordosis was measured on a standing neutral lumbar spine image for comparison, which was approximately −83°. This indicated that the patient had reached his limit of LL compensation for the increased TK, and the loading effect of gravity was greater than the forces his spinal extensors could produce. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was ordered to assess for neural compression and/or thoracic disk herniation. It was recommended that he undergo surgical intervention within the next 3 years to prevent additional progression of his disease and lumbar degeneration.
Figure 1.
Standing anterior-posterior radiographs from the initial visit to 5 months postoperatively. A and B, Preoperatively, the patient had severe thoracic kyphosis. C, Radiographs show posterior-only multilevel Smith-Peterson osteotomies from T7 to T11 and pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion from T4 to L2. D–F: Postoperative radiographs obtained at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 5 months.
Figure 2.
Standing lateral radiographs from the initial visit to 5 months postoperatively. A and B, Preoperatively, the patient had severe thoracic kyphosis. C, Radiographs show posterior-only multilevel Smith-Peterson osteotomies from T7 to T11 and pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion from T4 to L2. D–F: Postoperative radiographs obtained at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 5 months.
Figure 3.
Preoperative lateral lumbar supine extension and standing neutral radiographs demonstrating higher lumbar lordosis when standing versus supine in extension.
Two months after initial consultation, he returned to the clinic to discuss the MRI findings, which showed effacement of anterior cerebral spinal fluid in the lower thoracic spine and mild anterior wedging of the T7 to T11 vertebral bodies, but no neural compression or disk herniations (Figure 4). His T4 to T12 TK and T1 to T12 angle reduced to 36° and 49° after laying supine for the duration of the examination, respectively, indicating his curve was quite flexible. His Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was 13.3% and visual analog scale (VAS) was 0. Surgical intervention was offered in the form of PSF and SPO as needed for appropriate sagittal alignment.
Figure 4.

Image showing decreased T1 to T12 angle and T4 to T12 thoracic kyphosis measurements on the T2-weighted thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging compared with standing measurements demonstrated the flexibility of the patient's curve.
He underwent T4 to L2 PSF with T7 to T11 SPO (Figure 5). Sagittal alignment goals based on preoperative computer modeling (UNiD Adaptive Spine Intelligence, Medtronic) included TK 49°, LL −62°, PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL) −16°, and T1 to T12 angle 55° (Table 1). He tolerated the procedure well with no intraoperative complications or neuromonitoring changes. Radiographs on postoperative day three demonstrated intact instrumentation and improvement of the kyphosis (Figures 1 and 2). Sagittal measurements included TK 51°, LL −52°, PI-LL −6°, and T1 to T12 angle 58°. At the 6-week follow-up, he denied back pain, with an ODI of 0%. Radiographs demonstrated intact instrumentation without evidence of loosening, fracture, or migration.
Figure 5.

Illustration showing the preoperative surgical plan.
Table 1.
Spinopelvic Measurements Based on UNiD Adaptive Spine Intelligence
| Initial Visit | UNiD Sagittal Alignment Goals | Day 3 Postop | 3 Month Postop | 5 Month Postop | |
| Pelvic tilt, PT (°) | 7 | 8 | 12 | 9 | 9 |
| Pelvic incidence, PI (°) | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 45 |
| Sacral slope, SS (°) | 39 | 38 | 34 | 37 | 36 |
| Lumbar lordosis, LL (°) | −79 | −62 | −52 | −62 | −59 |
| PI-LL (°) | −32 | −16 | −6 | −16 | −14 |
| T1 pelvic angle, TPA (°) | 4 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
| Sagittal vertical axis, SVA (mm) | 1 | 2 | 30 | −4 | 6 |
| T4 to T12 thoracic kyphosis, TK (°) | 77 | 49 | 51 | 58 | 55 |
| T1 to T12 Angle (°) | — | 55 | 58 | 62 | — |
| Coronal balance (mm) | 2 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 8 |
At the 3-month follow-up, he again denied back pain, but ODI returned to baseline (13.3%). Full-spine radiographic sagittal parameters included TK 58°, LL −62°, PI-LL −16°, and T1 to T12 angle 62°, which trended toward a 10° correctional loss (Figures 1 and 2). However, at the 5-month follow-up, his ODI decreased to 2.2% and VAS remained 0. Imaging again demonstrated stable instrumentation, and T4 to T12 TK measured 55° and LL −59° (Figures 1 and 2).
Discussion
This case report introduces a novel surgical indication for SK. The patient had notable SK and lumbar hyperlordosis compensation. Greater LL on his standing neutral compared with supine hyperextension radiographs demonstrated he had exhausted his physiologic compensation reserve for the increased TK. We believe this surgical indication provides prophylactic prevention of accelerated lumbar degeneration of the remaining mobile segments secondary to continual hyperextension if not corrected.
Baastrup disease occurs when there is abnormal approximation of the spinous processes that causes interspinous bursitis, interspinous ligament degeneration, and back pain.21-26 This is often attributed to degenerative changes with age, but has also been reported in young patients.27-29 The ongoing compensatory lumbar hyperlordosis in this patient resulted in spinous process abutment, facet extension, and disk compressibility, which may predispose patients to developing Baastrup disease and its resulting sequela such as spinal stenosis.30 Comparing LL on neutral and hyperextension radiographs is an objective measurement that provides clinicians with data on the patient's compensatory reserve.
Target goals of SK alignment have varied over the years.7,18,31-33 The senior author recognizes probable overcorrection in the past, perhaps contributing to proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and distal junctional kyphosis issues.7,8,34,35 PI-based targets are now discussed, and avoiding large kyphosis-PI mismatch has been shown to decrease the risk of PJK.18,33,36-38 Lonner et al33 found that an increased postoperative maximum kyphosis to PI ratio was associated with radiographic evidence of PJK (1.5 versus 1.2, P = 0.0342). They concluded that patients with low PI require less final kyphosis and patients with high PI require higher final kyphosis. This patient had a preoperative T4 to T12 TK to PI ratio of 1.7, which was reduced to 1.1 in the immediate postoperative period and then increased to 1.2 at the 5-month follow-up due to slight correctional loss with no radiographic signs of PJK. Sarwahi et al36 also reported that a large PI to kyphosis mismatch increased risk of PJK and suggested that PJK could be a compensatory mechanism for the spinal imbalance. Nasto et al38 found that patients with SK with a high PI-LL mismatch postoperatively were at higher risk of developing PJK. They also found that the magnitude of TK correction correlated with LL reduction and, therefore, concluded that TK correction should be based on PI to prevent large mismatches.
Current alignment targets are often cited as 40 to 50°.7,35,36 However, surgical correction of TK < 50° should probably be avoided. The flexibility of the curve is also an important consideration. This patient's T4 to T12 TK decreased to 41° during the supine MRI compared with his initial standing radiographs (36° versus 77°, respectively). Radiographs from postoperative day three demonstrated that 26° of T4 to T12 TK correction was achieved (77° to 51°). This resulted in a T4 to T12 TK-PI mismatch of 5°. However, a 4° correctional loss was noted at the 5-month postoperative visit, which increased the mismatch to 9° (55° to 46°). This loss is similar to early reports by Bradford et al,15 but more recent studies have reported minimal correction losses (2.6° to 6°) using a posterior approach.39
Combined anterior-posterior spinal fusion for SK has been recommended by many investigators to maximize initial deformity correction, to prevent correctional loss, and to minimize the risk of pseudarthrosis.14,35,40 Ponte advocated a posterior-only approach using thoracic pedicle screws, which has been widely used for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis but has not been widely accepted owing to concerns that there would be a risk of correction loss and/or instrumentation failure.13 Geck et al13 provided additional evidence to support the use of the Ponte procedure with segmental posterior shortening osteotomies, and segmental pedicle screw fixation provides good correction of the deformity in SK. However, recent studies have demonstrated similar results for anterior-posterior and posterior-only approaches.36,41
A major motivation for surgical intervention in this patient was self-image. This is supported by his low ODI and VAS. This is in line with Murray et al,42 Dambourg et al,43 and Ristolainen et al44, who all reported minimal functional limitations in patients with curves up to 85°. In addition, Hosman et al reported 19 of 33 patients who considered physical appearance the major motivation for surgery,7 which was directly correlated with a low ODI score (7% preoperative vs. 3% postoperative).
Conclusion
In the adolescent patient with SK who has maximized their lumbar hyperlordosis compensation, surgical correction of the deformity should be considered to prevent accelerated degeneration of the lumbar spine.
Footnotes
Dr. Polly or an immediate family member serves as a paid consultant to Globus Medical and Alexion; has received nonincome support (such as equipment or services), commercially derived honoraria, or other non-research–related funding (such as paid travel) from Medtronic and Mizuho; serves as a paid consultant to SI Bone and has received nonincome support (such as equipment or services), commercially derived honoraria, or other non-research–related funding (such as paid travel) from Springer. Dr. Jones or an immediate family member serves as a paid consultant to Medtronic and SI Bone. None of the following authors nor any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Haselhuhn, Dr. Odland and Dr. Soriano.
References
- 1.Scheuermann HW: The classic: Kyphosis dorsalis juvenilis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;128:5-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gubbels CM, Oakely PA, McAviney J, Harrison DE, Brown BT: Reduction of scheuermann's deformity and scoliosis using ScoliBrace and a scoliosis specific rehabilitation program: A case report. J Phys Ther Sci 2019;31:159-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zloof Y, Ankory R, Braun AE, et al. : The hereditary nature of adolescent spinal deformities: A study of over 600,000 adolescents. Spine 2022;47:841-846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roaf R: Vertebral growth and its mechanical control. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1960;42-B:40-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Propst-Proctor SL, Bleck EE: Radiographic determination of lordosis and kyphosis in normal and scoliotic children. J Pediatr Orthop 1983;3:344-346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH: Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 1989;14:717-721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hosman AJ, Langeloo DD, de Kleuver M, Anderson PG, Veth RP, Slot GH: Analysis of the sagittal plane after surgical management for scheuermann's disease: A view on overcorrection and the use of an anterior release. Spine 2002;27:167-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Solla F, Clément JL, Cunin V, Bertoncelli CM, Fière V, Rampal V: Patient-specific rods for thoracic kyphosis correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: Preliminary results. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020;106:159-165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sorenson KH: Scheuermann's Juvenile Kyphosis: Clinical Appearances: Radiography. Aetiology and Prognosis. Copenhagen, Munkgaard, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arlet V, Schlenzka D: Scheuermann's kyphosis: Surgical management. Eur Spine J 2005;14:817-827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Polly DW, Jr, Ledonio CGT, Diamond B, et al. , Spinal Deformity Study Group: What are the indications for spinal fusion surgery in Scheuermann kyphosis?. J Pediatr Orthop 2019;39:217-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Behrbalk E, Uri O, Parks RM, Grevitt MP, Rickert M, Boszczyk BM: Posterior-only correction of Scheuermann kyphosis using pedicle screws: Economical optimization through screw density reduction. Eur Spine J 2014;23:2203-2210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, Shufflebarger HL: The Ponte procedure: Posterior only treatment of scheuermann's kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:586-593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bradford DS, Ahmed KB, Moe JH, Winter RB, Lonstein JE: The surgical management of patients with scheuermann's disease: A review of twenty-four cases managed by combined anterior and posterior spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:705-712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bradford DS, Moe JH, Montalvo FJ, Winter RB: Scheuermann's kyphosis. Results of surgical treatment by posterior spine arthrodesis in twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:439-448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koptan WM, Elmiligui YH, Elsebaie HB: All pedicle screw instrumentation for Scheuermann's kyphosis correction: Is it worth it?. Spine J 2009;9:296-302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee SS, Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, et al. : Comparison of Scheuermann kyphosis correction by posterior-only thoracic pedicle screw fixation versus combined anterior/posterior fusion. Spine 2006;31:2316-2321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lonner BS, Newton P, Betz R, et al. : Operative management of scheuermann's kyphosis in 78 patients: Radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique. Spine 2007;32:2644-2652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Poolman RW, Been HD, Ubags LH: Clinical outcome and radiographic results after operative treatment of Scheuermann's disease. Eur Spine J 2002;11:561-569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F: The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 2005;30:2024-2029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baastrup C: On the spinous processes of the lumbar vertebrae and the soft tissues between them, and on pathological changes in that region. Acta Radiologica 1933;14:52-55. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kwong Y, Rao N, Latief K: MDCT findings in Baastrup disease: Disease of normal feature of the aging spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1156-1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Maes R, Morrison WB, Parker L, Schweitzer ME, Carrino JA: Lumbar interspinous bursitis (Baastrup disease) in a symptomatic population: Prevalence on magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2008;33:e211-e215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bywaters EG, Evans S: The lumbar interspinous bursae and Baastrup's syndrome an autopsy study. Rheumatol Int 1982;2:87-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alonso F, Bryant E, Iwanaga J, Chapman JR, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS: Baastrup's disease: A comprehensive review of the extant literature. World Neurosurg 2017;101:331-334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Filippiadis DK, Mazioti A, Argentos S, et al. : Baastrup's disease (kissing spines syndrome): A pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2015;6:123-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Singh S: Baastrup's disease in the pediatric spine. Asian J Neurosurg 2016;11:446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ali AA, Jacobs BM, Gandhi A, Brooks M: Baastrup's disease in pediatric gymnasts. Children 2022;9:1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.DePalma MJ, Slipman CW, Siegelman E, et al. : Interspinous bursitis in an athlete. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:1062-1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rajasekaran S, Pithwa YK: Baastrup's disease as a cause of neurogenic claudication: A case report. Spine 2003;28:e273-e275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sardar ZM, Ames RJ, Lenke L: Scheuermann's kyphosis: Diagnosis, management, and selecting fusion levels. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:e462-e472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu Y, Hu Z, Zhang L, et al. : Selection of the optimal distal fusion level for Scheuermann kyphosis with different curve patterns: When can we stop above the sagittal stable vertebra?. Eur Spine J 2022;31:1710-1718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lonner BS, Parent S, Shah SA, et al. : Reciprocal changes in sagittal alignment with operative treatment of adolescent Scheuermann kyphosis-prospective evaluation of 96 patients. Spine Deform 2018;6:177-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L, et al. : Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: A comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:360-369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lowe TG, Kasten MD: An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. A review of 32 patients. Spine 1994;19:1680-1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sarwahi V, Hasan S, Galina J, et al. : In Scheuermann's kyphosis, a proximal UIV and postop kyphosis value close to patients' PI decreases the risk of PJK. Spine Deform 2022;10:1175-1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. : Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 2009;34:785-791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nasto LA, Perez-Romera AB, Shalabi ST, Quraishi NA, Mehdian H: Correlation between preoperative spinopelvic alignment and risk of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior-only surgical correction of Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine J 2016;16:S26-S33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sturm PF, Dobson JC, Armstrong GW: The surgical management of Scheuermann's disease. Spine 1993;18:685-691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Herndon WA, Emans JB, Micheli LJ, Hall JE: Combined anterior and posterior fusion for Scheuermann's kyphosis. Spine 1981;6:125-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yun C, Shen CL: Anterior release for scheuermann's disease: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:921-927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Murray PM, Weinstein SL, Spratt KF: The natural history and long-term follow-up of Scheuermann kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:236-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Damborg F, Engell V, Andersen MO, Kyvik KO, Thomsen K: There are only minor changes in quality of life in patients with Scheuermann's disease. Dan Med J 2014;61:A4790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ristolainen L, Kettunen JA, Heliövaara M, Kujala UM, Heinonen A, Schlenzka D: Untreated scheuermann's disease: A 37-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 2012;21:819-824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



