Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Feb 27;10(5):e27124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27124

Modification of structural, morphological, and dielectric properties of barium calcium titanate ceramics with yttrium addition

Hasnat Jahan Sumona 1, Abdullah Al Mahmood 1,, M Bodiul Islam 1, Jahid Hasan Kasem 1, MS Rahman 1
PMCID: PMC10915567  PMID: 38449623

Abstract

Barium calcium titanate (BCT) ceramics with varying yttrium doping concentrations were fabricated using the solid-state compaction process to explore the attributes of dopants. (Ba0.75Ca0.25) TiO3 and (Ba0.75Ca0.25) (YyTi(1-y)) O3 where, y = 0.00, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ceramics were synthesized by pressing isostatically in pellet press apparatus, then sintered at 1250 °C with consequent cooling in furnace ambient. The structural, morphological, and dielectric properties were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and impedance spectroscopy interpretations, respectively. The XRD analysis revealed that the cubic BCT lattice was transformed into a tetragonal structure with Yttrium doping. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) disclosed that yttrium doping countered the liquid phase formation of BCT as well as influenced grain development and microstructure, leading to the formation of distinct grain boundaries and improved densification. The average grain size (18–29 nm) of the Y-BCT increases as the doping level rises. At 60 Hz, it was reported that the dielectric constant obtained a maximum value of 70000 with a resistivity of 5 × 108 Ώ-cm for y = 0.15. The manifestation of the secondary phase confirmed from XRD, allocating an easy path for oxygen migration, might be responsible for the rise in oxygen vacancy, higher leakage current, and dielectric loss for y = 0.01. Co-doping of calcium and yttrium in BCT ceramics has modified the basic structure and ameliorated composites' structural stability and dielectric characteristics. The optimized sample, upon demonstrating outstanding efficiency, ought to be employed for specific uses such as energy storage devices and capacitors.

Keywords: Yttrium, Barium calcium titanate ceramics, Sintering, Grain size, Capacitor

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

  • Successful synthesis of Yttrium-modified Barium Calcium Titanate ceramics at distinct concentrations.

  • X-ray diffraction peaks find cubic barium calcium titanate and tetragonal Barium yttrium calcium titanate ceramics.

  • The Calcium titanate secondary phase present in barium calcium titanate suppresses grain size and dielectric constant.

  • Barium calcium titanate ceramics containing 0.15 yttrium concentration exhibit enhanced charge accumulation capacity without the presence of any secondary phase.

  • The presence of secondary phase YTi2O6 provides higher electromigration of oxygen vacancy and resistance degradation.

1. Introduction

A greater variety of electronic devices need to be multifunctional and miniature due to the rapid advancement of the integrated circuit industry. Traditional BaTiO3 ceramics, which have excellent ferroelectric properties, are used in a variety of electronic devices, such as multilayer ceramic capacitors [1]. To ensure the consistent operation of incredibly effective electronic circuits while taking variances in temperature into account, capacitors must develop novel compounds with high dielectric permittivity, small permittivity variability, and minimal dielectric loss across an extensive variety of temperatures [2]. The chemistry and geometry of ceramics profoundly influence the dielectric characteristics of capacitors. Controlling chemistry and geometry has thus emerged as a key strategy for enhancing the characteristics of BaTiO3. Through the use of dopants, solid solutions, and fabrication techniques, numerous kinds of perovskite lead-free dielectrics have recently been used to modify the chemical structure or topology of ceramics [3].

Recent research has concentrated on lead-free and environmentally acceptable BaTiO3-based dielectric compounds because of their substantial dielectric constant and polarization. Several lead-free piezoelectric ceramics, including potassium-sodium niobate (KNN), bismuth-potassium titanate (BKT), and bismuth-sodium titanate (BNT), have been explored over the past 20 years [4]. Nevertheless, these substances possess numerous adverse effects, including a minimal piezoelectric constant (d33) and high conductivity, leading to current leakage. Due to the aforementioned difficulties with alkali-based systems, modified lead-free piezoelectric devices made of barium titanate (BaTiO3) are recommended [5]. The impact of Calcium doping on the dielectric characteristics of BaTiO3 in the solid solution of Ba1-xCaxTiO3 (BCT) has received a lot of attention [6,7]. In fact, calcium inhibits reduction in BaTiO3 and lowers the chance of the undesirable hexagonal phase forming [8].

CaO effectively limits the formation of the grains, enhances the electromechanical characteristics, and expands the temperature range where the tetragonal state is stable [9,10]. Another major depressor is CaTiO3 (CT), which lowers the BT system's dielectric loss. Ba1-xCaxTiO3 (BCT) has been found to exist in a tetragonal phase for Ca2+ exchange (as a result of limited solubility, upwards of x = 0.25), that only marginally alters Curie Temperature (TC) but significantly affects dielectric characteristics. Ca2+ propensity to take over simultaneously A-site and B-site ions may offer several useful properties. Consequently, BCT is recognized as one of the potential alternatives for the risky PZT system electro-optic modulator [11,12]. Devries and Roy [13] investigated the phase relationships in the BaTiO3–CaTiO3 system. They conducted a phase analysis using a BaTiO3 solution at 1400 °C. The effects of calcium ion replacement on the ferroelectric structural transitions and dielectric properties of BaTiO3 have been studied. A uniform solid is created by CaTiO3 at up to 18 mol% [13]. While Mcquarrie and Behnke [14] reported that Ca-doped BaTiO3 indicated a lowering of the Curie point, Berlincourte and Kulesar discovered that Ca2+ replacement in BaTiO3 only generated minor alterations in the Curie point. The first to mention the potential presence of Ca2+ in both the Ba2+ and Ti4+ locations was Zhuang et al. [15] Following that, other writers executed to determine the site occupancy of Ca2+ in BaTiO3 produced by various approaches to processing. Yet, modifications to the unit cell dimension, persistent tardiness, adjustments in the crystal system, or putative topological modifications do not directly indicate cation replacements and arranging in (Ba, Ca, and Ti) O3 single crystals. To avoid suggesting a prior agreement on the placement of Ca2+ ions in the BaTiO3 matrix, this formula was utilized [16].

Doping ceramics made of barium titanate with calcium has several drawbacks, including i) Calcium doping can make barium titanate ceramics' Curie temperature lower. ii) Whereas doping can improve some characteristics of barium titanate ceramics, it can also reduce some ferroelectric characteristics, including remanent polarization and coercive field. iii) Doping with calcium can change the crystal structure of the material or introduce new phases. These affect materials stability and mechanical properties. To minimize the negative aspects of doping with calcium several researchers tried mixing a variety of dopants with barium calcium titanate. For example, Sol-gel technology has been effectively employed to manufacture Ba0.85Ca0.15Zr0.1Ti0.9O3 (BCZT) ceramics [17,18,19].

Numerous studies have been conducted on the implications of rare earth dopants on the dielectric characteristics of barium titanate [20,21]. In barium titanate ceramics, yttrium doping has several benefits and can considerably enhance the material's characteristics for a variety of applications [22]. The following are some of the main benefits of yttrium doping: The dielectric features of yttrium-doped barium titanate ceramics are improved, including the dielectric constant and dielectric loss. These qualities are beneficial in capacitors and other electronic components, which call for materials with superior dielectric properties [23,24]. The mechanical hardness and toughness of ceramics made of barium titanate can be increased by yttrium doping. Barium titanate ceramics can receive controlled levels of yttrium doping to increase their electrical conductivity [25]. When both ionic and electronic conductivity are necessary, like in electrochemical sensors and solid oxide fuel cells, this characteristic is helpful [26]. Barium titanate ceramics can have their crystal structure stabilized by yttrium doping, which also prevents undesirable phases from forming [15]. As a result, phase transition resistance and material stability are improved. It's crucial to remember that the precise composition, concentration, and processing parameters determine how well yttrium doping mitigates the drawbacks of calcium doping [27,28]. To obtain the desired performance for their specific application, material scientists and engineers need to carefully adjust the dopant concentrations and processing parameters. The practice of co-doping with rare earth elements are successfully obtained. Doped with hafnium (Hf), Ba [Zr0.2Ti0.8] O3 Ceramics made of (BZT) were created using the traditional solid-state reaction process [29].

In the present work, the combining effects of Calcium and Yttrium in barium titanate ceramics has been demonstrated. Secondary phase calcium titanate has developed, which has been found in the literature. The dielectric characteristics and material stability were deteriorated by the secondary phase [30]. Moreover, rare earth doping is becoming more and more common these days. For instance, yttrium is frequently used in barium titanate as one of the dopants. Yttrium can enhance material stability and stop unwanted phase development. In barium titanate, yttrium doping might lessen the negative effects of calcium doping. In the ABO3 perovskite structure, ions are found to occupy both the A and B sites. This study looks at how the physical properties of doped BCT ceramics change, specifically how the presence of trivalent rare earth (RE) ions at the B-site affects these properties. The findings presented in this study enhance our comprehension of the physical characteristics shown by perovskite materials doped with rare earth elements. Using the solid-state reaction approach, structural, morphological, and dielectric research have also been explored. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the effects of co-doping barium titanate with calcium and yttrium in varying concentrations. The results of this work pave the way for future investigations and the creation of special functional materials with specific qualities for a range of technological applications.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

A standard solid-state sintering technique was implemented for fabricating (Ba0.75Ca0.25) (YyTi(1-y))O3 (y = 0.0, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20) ceramic. The abbreviations for these ceramics are BCT, BCYT, BCY1.5T and BCY2T respectively. Reagents needed for the investigation were BaCO3 (Merck Specialities Pvt. Ltd, 99.95% Purity), CaCO3 (Merck Life Science Pvt. Ltd., 99.99% Purity), TiO2 (Merck Specialities Pvt. Ltd., 99.95% Purity), Y2O3 (Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., 99.9% Purity) originated from China.

2.2. Methods

Each of the materials was weighed exactly as needed, combined with the appropriate quantity of ethyl alcohol, and then pulverized for 20 h in a ball mill (G91-e.J. Payne, UK). The slurry was then put into a biker and dried for 24 h in a dryer (JISICO, J-s300S, Japan). The powders lasted 03 h in a mortar and pestle after drying. The mixes were then calcined for 02 h in an air-filled furnace at 1000 °C in an alumina crucible (Nabertherm GMBH, UK). A pellet press (Retsch Pellet Press PP 25) was subsequently employed to form the powder. The tablets were required to be shaped under 2.5 tons of compression. The tablets were then sintered in an air furnace for 2.5 h at 1250 °C (see Fig. 1). (Nabertherm GMBH, UK). A scanning electron microscope (ZEISS-EVO 18, UK) was applied to examine the structural characteristics of the sintered samples. To test the phase identification, X-ray diffraction (XRD; Bruker D8 Advanced, Germany) was used. The FULLPROF program was used to refine the structure. The impedance analyzer (Wayne Kerr 6500B series, UK) was used to test the room temperature (RT) dielectric constant with variable frequency.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Solid State Synthesis diagram of prepares sample.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. X-ray diffraction

The analysis of BaTiO3 with varied dopant concentrations depicts the increase of the lattice parameter. At ambient temperature, XRD patterns in the 2-theta range of (20°–90°) are determined. A comparison of BCT and BCYT sample XRD patterns is illustrated in Fig. 2. The entire XRD patterns show the reducing calcium and yttrium peaks, as well as the generation of the BaTiO3 peaks. The Fullprof Suite's toolbar is used to investigate these diffraction angles to demonstrate the crystal's symmetry [31], as shown in Fig. 4. With its peaks, the cubic structure of the P m −3 m space group of BCT crystal and the tetragonal structure of the P4mm space group of BCYT crystal can be found in the XRD patterns. The XRD of the sintering sample shows an extra peak of calcium titanate in the BCT and BCY1T samples, which matches JCPDS File No. 42–0535 [13]. Afterwards, when yttrium is started to be added at BCYT, the calcium titanate phase has begun to be demolished. Eventually, in BCY1.5T, there is no secondary phase. Therefore, the existence peaks of BCY1.5T fully match those of BaTiO3 (JCPDS file No. 05–0626). Further, when the amount of Y3+ increases in BCY2T, the secondary phase YTi2O6 (JCPDS file No. 00-047-1786) is created because some of the Y3+ ions tend to take up A-sites along with B-sites. More oxygen vacancies arise in the second stage as Y3+ tends to replace A-site ions (Ba2+). In the case of higher compositions of yttrium, such as BCY2T, a minor decrease in the c/a ratio was observed [32]. Furthermore, as illustrated in Table 2, aliovalent substitutions lead to a lattice distortion [31]. The fullprof refinement values and lattice parameters are given in Table 1. Debye-Scherer formula [31] is implemented to compute the crystallite size (τ) using the maximum intense peak (110). The crystallite size and crystallinity are exhibited in Table 3. The variation in the sharpness of (110) diffraction peaks at 30°–32° is represented in Fig. 3 (a). With the increase in yttrium content, the peak shifts to the lower angle at 32° due to the atomic size factor [22]. Following Williamson and Hall (W–H), the main factors contributing to the enlargement of diffraction peak regions are distortion and strain on the lattice in the component triggered by a crystallite imperfection [33,34]. The W–H diagrams of Y-BCT samples are displayed in Fig. 5. The Williamson-Hall (W–H) method is a commonly employed methodology in the field of ceramics to investigate the influence of strain on the dimensions of crystallites. The presence of lattice strain within a crystalline structure can result in the broadening of X-ray diffraction (XRD) peaks. Peak broadening analysis is used in the W–H method to find out the size of the crystallites and the strain in the crystal lattice. The W–H plot depicted in Fig. 5 (c) indicates that the line dispersions exhibit predominantly isotropic behavior. This observation illustrates the isotropic nature of the diffraction domain, with the additional presence of dopants contributing to the macrostrain [35]. In Fig. 5 (d), due to the existence of secondary phases, the sharpness of FWHM has declined. Moreover, the values do not coincide with the line, and the highest deviation is observed. It has been found that the existence of lattice strain inside the structure had an impact on the placement and peak widening in the XRD pattern. The strain in the lattice is brought on by the difference in ionic radii between the host ions and the dopant ions [36]. Lattice parameters are increased and the location of the peak changes to a lower 2θ due to the inclusion of yttrium ions (0.101 nm) with relatively high ionic radii at the titanium (0.068) site [37]. Hence, C-axis expansion is observed, which is assured by the lattice parameter value mentioned in Table 2 [38]. The sample's tetragonality is attributed to the splitting of the (002) and (200) peaks at 44°–45° are of the yttrium-calcium co-doped sample shown in Fig. 3 (b). Yttrium is responsible for the emergence of tetragonal structures in all the BCYT samples. Further analysis has revealed that with a higher concentration of yttrium doping, the structure is distorted. Strain and dislocation density gradually increased [39], as expressed Table 2. Thus, tetragonality is lower. Moreover, the sample's tetragonality is attributed to the splitting of the (002) and (200) peaks at 44°–45°. Magnifying the particular peaks for the BCY2T sample, peak broadening is allocated due to lattice distortion [18,19]. The degree of splitting and the difference in intensity between the (0 0 2) and (2 0 0) reflections show that the cubic and tetragonal phases existed at the same time [38]. The level of sharpness of those peaks shows that the samples are slightly moved towards cubic from tetragonal.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Rietveld analysis of (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

Table 2.

Tolerance factor (t), strain (€), dislocation density (⸹) of BCT, BCY1T, BCY1.5T and BCY2T ceramics.

Composition Ionic Radii
Nm
Tolerance
Factor, t
Strain, €
Nm
Dislocation density,⸹
Nm−2
A-site B-site
(BCT) 0.1286 0.0680 1.01101 4.13 2.30
(BCY1T) 0.1286 0.0683 1.00886 4.44 2.46
(BCY1.5T) 0.1286 0.0685 1.0074 6.52 7.42
(BCY2T) 0.1286 0.0687 1.0063 8.04 10.74

Table 1.

Structural parameters of BCT, BC1YT, BCY1.5T and BCY2T ceramics.

Composition Lattice Parameter (a = b)Å Lattice Parameter (c) Å ca Cell volume
Å3
R Factor
%
GoF χ2
(BCT) 3.9739 3.9739 1 62.75 Rp = 8.40
Rwp = 10.7
Rexp = 4.77
1.9 3.58
(BCY1T) 3.9806 3.9994 1.00472 63.37 Rp = 5.42 Rwp = 7.02
Rexp = 4.7
1.5 2.19
(BCY1.5T) 3.9805 3.9994 1.00474 63.36 Rp = 6.70
Rwp = 7.31
Rexp = 4.99
1.7 3.07
(BCY2T) 3. 8749 4.0037 1.00421 63.25 Rp = 5.54
Rwp = 7.31
Rexp = 4.77
1.5 2.35

Table 3.

Structural properties of the prepared of BCT, BCY1T, BCY1.5T and BCY2T ceramics.

Composition Crystallite size, τ (nm) Density,
ρexp (gcm−3)
Average Grain Size, (nm) Percent
Porosity
%
Crystallinity (%) Xrd Density,
ρexp (gcm−3)
(BCT) 16.58 2.86 18.48 53 62 6.111
(BCY1T) 20.12 3.29 24.53 47 67 6.267
(BCY1.5T) 21.12 4.44 26.57 27 71 6.513
(BCY2T) 22.41 4.25 29.28 35 69 6.573

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a) The peak shift pattern can be seen in the magnified section of the (110) peak in the region of 30°–32° on the spectrum of XRD of (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics and (b) structure enhanced between 44.5° and 46°.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Williamson and Hall (W–H) analysis of (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

3.2. Scanning electron microscopy

The formation of liquid phase segregation in the grain boundaries and aberrant growth of grains is observed in Fig. 6. Furthermore, irregular grain development is seen. In the experimentation, we have attempted to demonstrate that the following issue can be prevented by RE doping [40]. We noticed the development of cubic-like grains with sharp edges and definite borders. However, certain grains' agglomerated dispersion was also discovered in the Y-BCT samples represented in Fig. 6 (b, c, d). These figures depict how the coarse grains were agglomerating as the boundaries between the finer grains gradually blurred. The average grain size of undoped BCT is less than that of Y-BCT samples. The variation in grain size may result from the second phase. The calcium titanate secondary phase present in BCT reduces grain size. In addition to the reduction in grain size, the inclusion of up to y = 0.01 in the BCT (BCY1T) secondary phase emerges. Due to this factor, there are more imperfections between the grains, which can change how frequently the ceramic decays [41]. The calcium titanate secondary phase, whose existence is confirmed by XRD of the BCT sample, is responsible for the heterogeneity. The limited homogeneity of ceramic specimens shows that solid-state processes in the mixture of BaCO3, CaCO3, and TiO2 particles cause a nonuniform distribution of Ba2+ and Ca2+ ions at the unit cell level. Microscopic chemical inhomogeneity caused by diffusional limits and delayed reaction kinetics limits the solubility of CaTiO3 in BaTiO3 when synthesized by the method. Inhomogeneity in composition is caused by solid-state solutions during calcination and sintering. The secondary phase during the solidification process might impede grain growth [42]. Particles of calcium titanate could act as barriers during the solidification process, limiting the movement of grain borders and halting the coarsening or growth of the grains into bigger sizes [43]. In the microstructure, it is evident that second phases appear together with the grain boundary liquid phase and precipitate in BCT. Subsequently, it demonstrates that the grain distribution of Yttrium-doped BCT samples is more even, uniform, streamlined, and densely packed with a reduced porosity ratio than BCT. Barium vacancies aid in the densification process by diffusing more quickly than their ions. Due to improved diffusivity in the liquid phase of sintering, yttrium doping encourages densification [38]. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra for all the samples are illustrated in Fig. 7. While analyzing Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), gold facilitates the detection and analysis of the distinctive peaks. When examining a sample, additional gold peaks in the 2nd region of the EDS spectrum are observed for different causes, such as X-ray fluorescence originating from the substrate or coating, as well as surface contamination or oxidation [42]. The BCY2T sample has the largest grain size 29.28 nm, and they also have significant porosity which is mentioned in Table 3.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Surface microstructures of (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics at a magnification of × 50.00K.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra for (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

3.3. Dielectric property

The relative dielectric constant observations of unmodified and yttrium-doped BCT ceramics as a function of frequency are displayed in Fig. 8. It has been claimed that the crystal structure and grain size had a significant impact on the solid solutions' dielectric characteristics [36]. With yttrium doping, the BCT lattice turned into a tetragonal structure from a cubic one, and the grain size increased. The Y-BCT samples exhibit greater densification with less porosity than BCT. When Yttrium ion is substituted in the Ti-site, the internal strain is increased. This causes the Ti4+ ions to be injected into the octahedral centers, which increases the polarization and hence the dielectric constant [44]. No additional secondary phase, homogeneous topology, and a compacted structure with less porosity made the BCY1.5T specimen more acceptable. The BCY1.5T exhibits an exceptional dielectric constant with an elevated rate of charge accumulation compared to other samples, as seen in Fig. 8 (c). Afterwards, with the addition of yttrium in the BCT lattice, a BCY2T specimen was produced. Due to the larger atomic size of yttrium, which substituted titanium, higher strain caused defects like dislocations and abnormal grain growth. Consequently, the dielectric constant declaimed for BCY2T, is represented in Fig. 8 (d). The low-frequency band (100–1000 Hz) demonstrates a substantial reduction in the dielectric constant. The capacitive responsiveness decreases at elevated frequencies when the charge carriers are more likely to be mobile and able to follow an AC frequency. Relaxation is necessary because interfacial polarization delays ion reversal with fluctuating fields at low frequencies [45]. To determine the Debye relaxation time, the following equation can be employed:

τ = ε / (σ T) (1)

where τ is the relaxation time, ε is the dielectric constant, σ is the electrical conductivity, and T is the temperature.

γ = 1/τ = σ T / ε (2)

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Changes of dielectric constant with frequency for synthesized (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

It can be expressed using the Arrhenius law, which relates temperature to relaxation time.

τ = τ0 exp (Ea/kB T) (3)
ln τ = ln τ0 + (Ea/kB) (1/T) (4)

where τ0 is a pre-exponential factor, Ea is the activation energy, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature.

The Barium site is occupied by Ca ions. The intrinsic disorder effect has been brought about by the substitution of A or B cation positions in the ABO3 structure. It is found that the dielectric constant gradually decreases when yttrium doping approaches BCY2T. Oxygen vacancies contribute to the deficiency charge when the Y3+ cation is aliovalently incorporated at the Ti site, with the reaction

Y2O3 + 2BaO → 2BaBa +2Y’Ti +5OO + V″O (5)

The BCY1.5T has the highest value of maximum dielectric constant, which could be attributed to the presence of well-developed grains, as depicted in Fig. 6 (c). The presence of well-developed grains facilitates the movement of domain walls, resulting in an increased dielectric constant. Furthermore, the augmentation in dielectric constant could also be understood as a result of the subsequent factor. Due to the fact that sintering is conducted in an ambient air environment, there is a potential for reoxidation to occur in the vicinity of the grains during the cooling phase [40]. Consequently, the lattice structure has the capacity to absorb oxygen from the surrounding atmosphere. The process of reoxidation leads to the formation of a robust insulating layer surrounding the grains, which exhibits increased bulk resistance. The disparity in conductivity between the bulk and grain boundaries arises from the fact that the grain boundary exhibits higher resistance and capacitance compared to the grain interior. Consequently, this leads to the accumulation of surface charge and an increase in interfacial polarization, ultimately resulting in an elevation of the dielectric constant [23].

The observed significant rise in dielectric loss could be attributed to the accelerated mobility of charge carriers resulting from flaws or vacancies present in the sample. The dielectric loss tends to go up, and this may be caused by the creation of the second phase in BCY1T during the sintering process, which determines the dielectric characteristics [46,32], which is shown in Fig. 9 (b). The second phase of YTi2O6 corresponding to titanium, was formed when Y2O3 was added to the BaTiO3 ceramics [47]. The YTi2O6 phase's higher oxygen ionic conductivity will speed up the electro-migration of oxygen vacancies, which will lead to resistance degradation [48]. Ionic defect structures are typically in partially frozen-in states after sintering and during the cooling process, retaining the high-temperature defect structures. As a result, the phase present in the dielectric layer of the ceramic capacitor based on BaTiO3 may have a substantial impact on the dependability of insulating resistance by facilitating the electro migration of oxygen vacancies [49]. The XRD pattern verifies the existence of BCY1T ceramic second phases. The elevated carrier mobility of the ceramics can be attributed to their exceptionally porous microstructure. Perhaps the amount of porosity is 47% for BCY1T, which is higher than other Y-BCT samples. This phenomenon was also responsible for higher dielectric loss. Therefore, the production of cation-rich and/or oxygen-deficient precipitates at the grain boundaries (i.e., functioning as conduction routes) is responsible for the high electrical conductivity of the BCY1T ceramic [50]. It is well known that charge trapping defects, such as oxygen vacancies, that preferentially cluster at grain boundaries offer preferred percolation pathways for leakage current [41]. As a result, the grain boundaries would serve as electron transport conduction routes. The presence of loosely bound oxygen vacancies may move to the grain boundary and contribute to the space charge's polarization; internal stress is higher for BCY1T due to the second phase [51,52].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Changes in dielectric loss tangent with frequency for synthesized (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

3.4. Electrical property (frequency dependence of AC resistivity and conductivity)

The resistivity profile of the samples manufactured is shown in Fig. 10, which illustrates the way frequency-aligned dependence on Y3+ concentration at ambient temperature works. The concentrations of Y3+ doping at substantial levels reveal significant upward resistivity with the comparison of BCT. Resistivity has a sharply declining pattern up to the 110 KHz frequency range before being frequency-independent. It can be explained by the fact that hopping random charge carriers in the low-frequency band reduce resistivity [23]. Consequently, the occurrence of an additional phase in the dielectric substance of a ceramic capacitor developed on the BCY1T substrate may significantly affect the dependability of insulation resistance by exposing an easy route for oxygen vacancies to migrate electrochemically, which is responsible for the higher electrical conductivity and less resistance [53]. According to reports, the secondary phase possesses an oxygen ion conductivity that is 4–12 times greater than that of undoped BaTiO3 [54]. y = 0.01 (BCY1T) sample has the highest electrical conductivity 2.04 × 10−7 S/m than other Y-BCT samples, which is represented in Fig. 11 (b). The resistivity and conductivity value at room temperature is also mentioned in Table 4. The complexity of conductivity in dielectrics is widely acknowledged. Firstly, in the BCY1T sample, conductivity stays nearly constant, resembling a plateau. The most common mechanisms probably charge compensation via cation vacancies [55]. The conductivity improves continuously while the electron mobility stays constant. The BCY1T sample consistently exhibits higher electrical conductivities than the other samples. The Y3+ dissolution kinetics might also be reflected in the slope of rising conductivity [56]. Furthermore, conductivities arise from a combined mechanism of cation and electron vacancy compensation, wherein the electron compensation occurs gradually. The inclusion of pores within BCT sample has the potential to augment its surface area, thereby facilitating an increase in the quantity of charge carriers that are accessible for participation in the electric current. This phenomenon results in an elevation of the material's conductivity and a concomitant reduction in resistance [57]. The existence of flaws, vacancies, imperfections, and variations in lattice characteristics has an impact on it. From SEM analysis it was reported that the BCT specimen exhibits reduced grain size and possesses a microstructure characterized by porosity [56]. The overall conductivity in the sintered ceramic of BCY1.5T is influenced by the occupancy of the Y3+ site; Y3+ turns into an acceptor-cation and self-compensates. Its more noticeable impact on conductivity has made it possible for Y3+ to dissolve more readily, which in turn has led to decreased conductivity as a result of self-compensation [58]. Hence the highest resistivity was attained for BCY1.5 T. Fig. 12 displays the Nyquist plots, which depict the relationship between the imaginary portion of the impedance (Z″) and the real part of the impedance (Z′), throughout a broad frequency spectrum. These plots serve as a means of examining the impedance qualities. It is important to observe that the complex impedance spectrum had a linear trend with a significant gradient, which signifies the sample's insulating characteristics [59]. Among the several options considered, BCY1.5T exhibited the highest degree of insulation due to its pronounced elevation in the plotted line [60]. The BCY1T sample demonstrated a semicircular response when subjected to low frequencies, whereas at higher frequencies, it displayed a little curvature before transitioning into a linear behavior [61]. In contrast, BCY1.5T did not demonstrate semicircle behavior when subjected to low frequencies. However, the three samples exhibited comparable behavior when exposed to high frequencies [35,58].

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Variation of resistivity with frequency for synthesized (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Variation of AC conductivity with frequency of synthesized (a) BCT, (b) BCY1T, (c) BCY1.5T and (d) BCY2T ceramics.

Table 4.

Dielectric properties and reciprocal of relaxation time, (γ) value of BCT, BCY1T, BCY1.5T And BCY2T ceramics at temperature 300K.

Sample Dielectric Constant (κ) at 1000 k Hz Dielectric Loss (tanδ) Electrical conductivity, σ (S/m) γ = σ T/ε Resistivity (Ώ-cm)
(BCT) 113 0.138 1.10 × 10−5 2.52 × 10−6 9.00 × 104
(BCY1T) 238 0.440 2.04 × 10−7 4.09 × 10−8 4.00 × 107
(BCY1.5T) 2150 0.029 4.95 × 10−9 2.14 × 10−11 5.00 × 108
(BCY2T) 1244 0.072 2.49 × 10−8 4.17 × 10−9 4.00 × 108

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Frequency dependence of (a) dielectric constant, (b) dielectric loss, (c) electrical conductivity, and (d) Nyquist (Z″ vs. Z′) plot for synthesized BCT, BCY1T, BCY1.5T and BCY2T ceramics.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, BCYT- (00, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20) ceramics were successfully prepared by solid-state method. Yttrium doping in barium titanate ceramics can supplement the positive effects of calcium doping and mitigate some of its negative effects. This comprehensive investigation shows that yttrium doping plays a significant role in modifying the structural stability, phase stability, and chemical compatibility of barium calcium titanate ceramics.

  • The cubic structure of the P m −3 m space group of BCT crystal and the tetragonal structure of the P4mm space group of BCYT crystal are found in the XRD patterns. Crystallite size, grain size, strain and dislocation density increased with the inclusion of yttrium because of the larger ionic radius of yttrium than titanium.

  • The calcium titanate secondary phase present in BCT suppresses grain size 18.48 nm, has higher electrical conductivity 1.10 × 10−5 S/m and less resistivity 9 × 104 Ώ-cm. BCY1.5T exhibits an exceptional dielectric constant with an elevated rate of charge accumulation compared to other samples.

  • The ranges of the dielectric constant were standardized for the y = 0.01 (BCY1T) specimen to demonstrate the declining dependency with frequency to evaluate the particular influence of the secondary phase on the dielectric characteristics.

  • The higher oxygen ionic conductivity of the YTi2O6 phase will speed up the electro-migration of oxygen gaps, which will lower the resistance. BCY1.5 T was found to have the highest resistance. So, the presence of an extra phase in the dielectric material of a ceramic capacitor made on a BCY1T substrate can have a big effect on how reliable the insulation resistance is. This is because it makes it easy for oxygen vacancies to move electrochemically, which is what gives Y-BCT ceramics their higher electrical conductivity and lower resistance.

The results of this work reveal new avenues for investigation and the creation of novel functional materials with specific features for a range of technological applications.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Hasnat Jahan Sumona: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Abdullah Al Mahmood: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology. M. Bodiul Islam: Writing – review & editing. Jahid Hasan Kasem: Investigation, Formal analysis. M.S. Rahman: Resources.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The authors sincerely acknowledge the supports provided by the laboratories in the Department of Glass & Ceramic Engineering, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology (RUET), and Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

References

  • 1.Mitic Vojislav V., Nikolic Zoran S., Pavlovic Vladimir B. “Influence of rare-earth dopants on barium titanate ceramics microstructure and corresponding electrical properties,”. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010;(25042):132–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03309.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kader S.M.A., Ruth D.E.J., Gajendra M.V., Muneeswaran M. Investigations on the effect of Ba and Zr co-doping on the structural, thermal, electrical and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 multiferroics. Ceram. Int. 2016;43 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Han X., et al. Excellent dielectric properties and enhanced temperature stability of CaZrO3 - modified BaTiO3 ceramic capacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020;31(16):13088–13094. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10854-020-03859-w [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Panda P.K., Sahoo B., Sureshkumar V., Politova E.D. Effect of Zr 4 + on piezoelectric , dielectric and ferroelectric properties of barium calcium titanate lead-free ceramics. Journal of Advanced Dielectrics. 2021;11(6):1–9. doi: 10.1142/S2010135X21500247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park J., Lee Y., Kim K., Kim Y. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research B structural study of Ca doped barium titanate. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2012;284:44–48. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sreenivas V., Pradhan D.K., Riggs B.C., Chrisey D.B., Katiyar R.S. Investigations on structure , ferroelectric , piezoelectric and energy storage properties of barium calcium titanate (BCT)ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2014;584:369–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kadira L. Dielectric study of calcium doped barium titanate Ba1- xCaxTiO3 ceramics. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2016;11(6):71–79. doi: 10.5897/IJPS2015.4415. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Varatharajan R., Samanta S.B., Jayavel R., Subramanian C., V Narlikar A., Ramasamy P. Ferroelectric characterization studies on barium calcium titanate single crystals. Mater. Char. 2000;45:89–93. doi: 10.1016/S1044-5803(00)00053-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paunovic V., Živkovic L., Vracar L., Mitic V., Miljkovic M. The effects of additive on microstructure and electrical properties of BaTiO3 ceramics. Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering. 2004;1(3):89–98. doi: 10.2298/SJEE0403089P. 1(3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.V Motta F., et al. Preparation and characterizations of Ba0.8Ca0.2TiO3 by complex polymerization method (CPM) J. Alloys Compd. 2008;465:452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zaman T., Islam K., Rahman A., Hussain A., Matin A. Mono and co-substitution of Sr 2 + and Ca 2 + on the structural, electrical and optical properties of barium titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019;45(8):10154–10162. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Federal U., De Pernambuco R., Paula A., Marques D.A., Tranquilin R., Paskocimas C.A. “Effect of different starting materials on the synthesis of Ba0.8Ca0.2TiO3”. Journal of Advanced Ceramics. 2015;4(1) doi: 10.1007/s40145-015-0134-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jayanthi S., Kutty T.R.N. Extended phase homogeneity and electrical properties of barium calcium titanate prepared by the wet chemical methods. Mater. Sci. Eng., B. 2004;110:202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhuang Z.Q., Harmer M.P., Smyth D.M., Newnham R.E. The effect of octahedrally-coordinated calcium on the ferroelectric transition of BaTiO3. Mater. Res. Bull. 1987;22(c) doi: 10.1016/0025-5408(87)90296-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alshoaibi A., Kanoun M.B., Haq B.U., Alfaify S., Goumri-said S. Insights into the impact of yttrium doping at the Ba and Ti sites of BaTiO3 on the electronic structures and optical properties :AFirst-PrinciplesStudy. ACS Omega. 2020;25:15502–15509. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ca B., et al. Improved dielectric and energy storage properties in (1-x) BaTi0.80Zr0.20O-xBa0.70Ca0.30Ti0.99Fe0.01O3 ceramics near morphotropic phase boundary. Mater. Lett. 2021;2100062:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhang Q., Cai W., Li Q., Gao R., Chen G. Enhanced piezoelectric response of (Ba, Ca) (Ti, Zr) O 3 ceramics by super large grain size and construction of phase boundary. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;794:542–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Som S.M.R.S.T. Effect of Fe-ion implantation doping on structural and optical properties of CdS thin films. Appl. Phys. A. 2010;99:837–842. doi: 10.1007/s00339-010-5598-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sarangi S., Tan I.C., Brazdeikis A. Magnetic imaging method based on magnetic relaxation of magnetic nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2012;93926(2009) doi: 10.1063/1.3125460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shan D., Qu Y.F., Song J.J. Dielectric properties and substitution preference of yttrium doped barium zirconium titanate ceramics. Solid State Commun. 2007;141:65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2006.09.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fu C., Cai W. A comparative study on the structural, dielectric and multiferroic properties. Compos. Part B. 2019;166(November 2018):204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Silva M.S., Ferreira N.S. Effects of La doping on the structural and dielectric properties of barium-titanate ceramics. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014;975:36–41. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.975.36. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Islam S., Khatun N., Hossain M.S. Investigation of structural , dielectric and electrical properties of barium titanate ceramics Co-doped with bismuth and yttrium. Journal of Molecular and Engineering Materials. 2019;7:2251–2381. doi: 10.1142/S2251237319500060. October 2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Muta H., Kurosaki K., Yamanaka S. Thermoelectric properties of rare earth doped SrTiO3. J. Alloys Compd. 2003;350:292–295. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00972-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Velasco-davalos I.A., Ruediger A., Cruz-rivera J.J., Gomez-yanez C. Mechanical niobium doping in barium titanate electroceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2013;581:56–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.06.187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Belous A., Oleg V., Kovalenko L., Makovec D. Redox processes in highly yttrium-doped barium titanate. J. Solid State Chem. 2005;178:1367–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2005.01.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kumar S., Luthra V. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids Raman and infrared spectroscopic investigation of the effects of yttrium and tin co-doping in barium titanate. J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 2021;154(March) doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu J., Jin G., Chen Y., Xue W. Properties of yttrium-doped barium titanate ceramics with positive temperature coefficient of resistivity and a novel method to evaluate the depletion layer width. Ceram. Int. 2019;45(5):6119–6124. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cai W., Fu C., Gao J., Lin Z., Deng X. Effect of hafnium on the microstructure , dielectric and ferroelectric. Ceram. Int. 2012;38(4) doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.12.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lim Young Soo, Sasikumar Subramanian, Lee Hae Won. Competing effects of Ca doping on the phase transition and related properties in (Ba1–xCax)(Ti0.95Sn0.05)O3 ceramics. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2023 doi: 10.1007/s43207-023-00341-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ganguly M., et al. Characterization and rietveld refinement of A-site deficient lanthanum doped barium titanate. J. Alloys Compd. 2013;579 doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.06.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jha P.A., Jha A.K. Effects of yttrium substitution on structural and electrical properties of barium zirconate titanate ferroelectric ceramics. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013;13(7):1413–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2013.04.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Balakt A.M., Shaw C.P., Zhang Q. Enhancement of pyroelectric properties of lead-free 0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3 ceramics by La doping. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.12.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hannachi E., Almessiere M.A., Slimani Y., Alshamrani R.B., Yasin G., Ben Azzouz F. Preparation and characterization of high-T c (YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7- δ) 1-x/(CNTs) x superconductors with highly boosted superconducting performances. Ceram. Int. 2021;47:23539–23548. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ravanamma R., et al. Yttria activated lanthanum -barium titanate ceramic electrode for fast charging supercapacitor applications. J. Mol. Struct. 2023;1294(P2) doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136352. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akmal M.H.M., Warikh A.R.M., Azlan U.A.A., Azam M.A. Structural evolution and dopant occupancy preference of yttrium-doped potassium sodium niobate thin films. J. Electroceram. 2016:3–10. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10832-016-0039-9 [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumar S., Shrivastava V., Vandna O.P.T. Cumulative effect of yttrium and tin co-doping on the structural and ferroelectric properties of sol – gel derived barium titanate. J. Sol. Gel Sci. Technol. 2023;105:304–314. doi: 10.1007/s10971-022-05910-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Renteria-marquez H.K.A., Love N.D., Lin Y., Islam D., Chavez L.A. Fabrication of bulk piezoelectric and dielectric BaTiO 3 ceramics using paste extrusion 3D printing technique. Journal of Americal Ceramic Society. 2018;102(6):3685–3694. doi: 10.1111/jace.16242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chandramohan S., et al. Modifications in structural and optical properties of Mn-ion implanted CdS thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009;256:465–468. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moraes A.P.A., et al. Structural and optical properties of rare earth – doped (Ba0. 77Ca0. 23) 1 − x (Sm , Nd , Pr , Yb) xTiO3 Structural and optical properties of rare earth – doped (Ba0.77Ca0.23)(1-x)(Sm, Nd, Pr, Yb)(x)TiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2011 doi: 10.1063/1.3594710. 0–8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Slimani Y., et al. Study on the addition of SiO2 nanowires to BaTiO3 : structure, morphology, electrical and dielectric properties. J. Phys. Chem. Solid. 2021;156(May) doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bijalwan V., Tofel P., Holcman V. Grain size dependence of the microstructures and functional properties of (Ba 0.85 Ca 0.15– x Ce x) (Zr 0.1 Ti 0.9) O3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2020:1–10. doi: 10.1080/21870764.2018.1539211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Özen M., Mertens M., Snijkers F., Cool P. Hydrothermal synthesis and formation mechanism of tetragonal barium titanate in a highly concentrated alkaline solution. Ceram. Int. 2016:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Society M. Effect of yttrium doping in barium zirconium titanate ceramics : a structural, impedance, modulus-spectroscopy study. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2013;44:4296–4309. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11661-013-1770-3 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.More S., Dhokne R., Moharil S. Dielectric relaxation and electric modulus of polyvinyl alcohol Zinc oxide composite films. Mater. Res. Express. 2018;4 doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Badapanda T., Univeristy C.V.R.G., Rout S.K., Panigrahi S., Sinha T.P. Dielectric behavior of yttrium doped barium-zirconium-titanate ceramics. J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 2009;55(141):65–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2006.09.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Search H., Journals C., Contact A., Iopscience M., Address I.P. Relationship between the evolutions of the microstructure and semiconductor properties of yttrium-doped barium titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018;345403:12–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yoon S., Park Y., Hong J., Sinn D. Effect of the pyrochlore (Y 2 Ti 2 O 7) phase on the resistance degradation in yttrium-doped BaTiO3 ceramic capacitors. J. Mater. Res. 2007;(May 2014):2539–2543. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2007.0326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Maksoud M.I.A.A., et al. Springer International Publishing; 2020. Advanced Materials and Technologies for Supercapacitors Used in Energy Conversion and Storage : a Review. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hörlein M.P., Opitz A.K., Fleig J. On the variability of oxygen exchange kinetics of platinum model electrodes on yttria stabilized zirconia. Solid State Ionics. 2013;247–248:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kumar S., Thakur O., Luthra V. Modulating the effect of yttrium doping on the structural and dielectric properties of barium titanate. Phys. Status Solidi. 2018;215(7):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10529. 1700710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aghayan M., Zak A.K., Behdani M., Hashim A.M. Sol – gel combustion synthesis of Zr-doped BaTiO3 nanopowders and ceramics : dielectric and ferroelectric studies. Ceram. Int. 2014;40:16141–16146. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Paunović V., Živković L., Mitić V. Influence of rare-earth additives (La, Sm and Dy) on the microstructure and dielectric properties of doped BaTiO3 ceramics. Sci. Sinter. 2010;42(1):69–79. doi: 10.2298/SOS1001069P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yoo H., Song C., Lee D. BaTiO3 − δ : defect structure, electrical conductivity, chemical diffusivity, BaTiO3 − δ : defect structure, electrical conductivity. J. Electroceram. 2014;8(1):5–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1015570717935. July 2002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Makovec D., Samardz Z., Drofenik M. Solid solubility of Holmium , yttrium , and Dysprosium in BaTiO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004;1329(10167):1324–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb07729.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang H., et al. The dielectric properties of alternately doped Ba1-xSrxTiO3 films with different Ba/Sr ratios with different Ba/Sr ratios. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:8300–8304. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.136. r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cai Z., et al. High-temperature lead-free multilayer ceramic capacitors with ultrahigh energy density and efficiency fabricated via two-step sintering. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019:14575–14582. doi: 10.1039/C9TA04317A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rallapalli R. Niobium oxide-activated yttrium barium titanate nanorod structured ceramics for energy storage applications. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2022:2053–2063. doi: 10.1111/ijac.14013. no. January. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Choi W., Shin H., Kim J.M., Choi J., Yoon W. Modeling and applications of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for Lithium-ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2019;11:1–8. doi: 10.33961/jecst.2019.00528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ravanamma R., R K.M., K V.K., Ravi N. Materials Today : proceedings Structure and morphology of yttrium doped barium titanate ceramics for multi-layer capacitor applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021;46(1):259–262. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kola L., Bihari A., Rath M., Rao M.S.R., Murugavel P. Impedance characteristics and PTCR e ff ect in lead free BaTi 1- x Sn x O 3 piezoceramics. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018;106(June):371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES