Abstract
Tea-oil tree (Camelliaoleifera Abel.) is an important edible oil woody plant with a planting area over 3,800,000 hectares in southern China. Species of Diaporthe inhabit a wide range of plant hosts as plant pathogens, endophytes and saprobes. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey in Hainan Province to identify and characterise Diaporthe species associated with tea-oil leaf spots. As a result, eight isolates of Diaporthe were obtained from symptomatic C.oleifera leaves. These isolates were studied, based on morphological and phylogenetic analyses of partial ITS, cal, his3, tef1 and tub2 gene regions. Two new Diaporthe species (D.hainanensis and D.pseudofoliicola) were proposed and described herein.
Key words: DNA phylogeny, systematics, taxonomy, tea-oil tree, two new taxa
Introduction
Tea-oil tree, Camelliaoleifera Abel., is a unique woody edible oil species in China, mainly distributed in the Qinling-Huaihe River area. It has a long history of cultivation and utilisation for more than 2300 years since ancient China (Zhuang 2008). Camellia oil, obtained from C.oleifera seeds, is rich in unsaturated fatty acids and unique flavours and has become a rising high-quality edible vegetable oil in China. The edible of tea-oil is also conducive to preventing cardiovascular sclerosis, anti-tumour, lowering blood lipid, protecting liver and enhancing human immunity (Wang et al. 2007). According to the Three-year Action Plan for Accelerating the Development of oil tea Industry, Hainan Province is listed as a key development area of oil tea and the total area of oil tea planting in the Province is planned to reach 16,667 hm2 by 2025. The development of C.oleifera industry is of great significance for the economic development of Hainan Province and the poverty alleviation of local farmers.
The expanding cultivation of C.oleifera over the last several decades has attracted increasing attention from plant pathologists to infectious diseases on this crop. Therein, diseases caused by Diaporthe species have become the emerging Camellia leaf diseases in southern China (Zhou and Hou 2019; Yang et al. 2021). During July and August of 2022, new leaf spots were detected on tea-oil tree with irregular, brownish-grey lesions, often associated with leaf margins. Infected leaves cultured on medium had dark pycnidia producing ellipsoid guttulate conidia, similar to that of Diaporthe species (Yang et al. 2021). The asexual morph is characterised by ostiolate conidiomata, with cylindrical phialides producing three types (alpha, beta and gamma conidia) of hyaline, aseptate conidia (Udayanga et al. 2011; Gomes et al. 2013).
Species identification criteria in Diaporthe has mainly relied on host association, morphology and culture characteristics (Mostert et al. 2001; Santos and Phillips 2009; Udayanga et al. 2011), which resulted in the description of over 200 species. Some species of Diaporthe were reported to colonise a single host plant, while other species were found to be associated with different host plants (Santos and Phillips 2009; Diogo et al. 2010; Santos et al. 2011; Gomes et al. 2013). In addition, considerable variability of the phenotypic characters was found to be present within a species (Rehner and Uecker 1994; Mostert et al. 2001; Udayanga et al. 2011). During the past decade, a polyphasic approach, based on multi-locus DNA data, morphological, phytopathological and phylogenetical analyses, has been employed for species boundaries in the genus Diaporthe (Huang et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2016, 2017; Guarnaccia and Crous 2017, 2018; Guarnaccia et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2018, 2020, 2021; Cao et al. 2022; Bai et al. 2023; Zhu et al. 2023).
The classification of Diaporthe has been on-going; however, little is known about species able to infect C.oleifera. Thus, the objective of the present study was to identify the prevalence of Diaporthe spp. associated with tea-oil tree leaf spot in the major plantations in Hainan Province, based on morphological and phylogenetic features.
Materials and methods
Fungal isolation
Leaves of C.oleifera with typical symptoms of leaf spots were collected from the main tea-oil camellia production fields in Hainan Province. Small sections (3 × 3 mm) were cut from the margins of infected tissues and surface-sterilised in 75% ethanol for 30 s, then sterilised in 5% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, followed by three rinses with sterilised water and finally dried on sterilised filter paper (Yang et al. 2021). The sections were then plated on to PDA plates and incubated at 25 °C. Fungal growth was examined daily for up to 7 d. Isolates were then transferred aseptically to fresh PDA and purified by single-spore culturing (Fan et al. 2015). All fungal isolates were placed on PDA slants and stored at 4 °C. Specimens and axenic cultures are maintained in the Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CSUFT) in Changsha, Hunan Province.
Morphological and cultural characterisation
Agar plugs (6 mm diam.) were taken from the edge of actively growing cultures on PDA and transferred on to the centre of 9 cm diam. Petri dishes containing 2% tap water agar supplemented with sterile pine needles (PNA; Smith et al. (1996)) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 25 °C under a 12 h near-ultraviolet light/12 h dark cycle to induce sporulation as described in recent studies (Gomes et al. 2013; Lombard et al. 2014). Colony characters and pigment production on PNA and PDA were noted after 10 d. Colony colours were rated according to Rayner (1970). Cultures were examined periodically for the development of ascomata and conidiomata. The morphological characteristics were examined by mounting fungal structures in clear lactic acid and 30 measurements at 1000× magnification were determined for each isolate using a Leica compound microscope (DM 2500) with interference contrast (DIC) optics. Descriptions, nomenclature and illustrations of taxonomic novelties are deposited in MycoBank (Crous et al. 2004a).
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from colonies grown on cellophane-covered PDA using a CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) method (Doyle and Doyle 1990). DNA was estimated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel and the quality was measured using the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the user manual (Desjardins et al. 2009). PCR amplifications were performed in a DNA Engine Peltier Thermal Cycler (PTC-200; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The primer set ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) was used to amplify the ITS region. The primer pair CAL228F/CAL737R (Carbone and Kohn 1999) was used to amplify the calmodulin gene (cal) and the primers CYLH4F (Crous et al. 2004b) and H3-1b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) were used to amplify part of the histone H3 (his3) gene. The primer pair EF1-728F/EF1-986R (Carbone and Kohn 1999) was used to amplify a partial fragment of the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (tef1). The primer set T1 (O’Donnell and Cigelnik 1997) and Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) was used to amplify the beta-tubulin gene (tub2); the additional combination of Bt2a/Bt2b (Glass and Donaldson 1995) was used in case of amplification failure of the T1/Bt2b primer pair. The PCR amplifications of the genomic DNA with the phylogenetic markers were undertaken using the same primer pairs and conditions as in Yang et al. (2018). PCR amplification products were assayed via electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels. DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM 3730XL DNA Analyzer with a BigDye Terminater Kit v.3.1 (Invitrogen, USA) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China).
Phylogenetic analyses
The quality of the amplified nucleotide sequences was checked and combined using SeqMan v.7.1.0 and reference sequences were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), based on recent publications on the genus Diaporthe (Guarnaccia et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2018, 2020, 2021; Cao et al. 2022). Sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.6 (Katoh and Toh 2010) and corrected manually using Bioedit 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999). The best-fit nucleotide substitution models for each gene were selected using jModelTest v.2.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2012) under the Akaike Information Criterion.
The phylogenetic analyses of the combined gene regions were performed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods. ML was conducted using PhyML v.3.0 (Guindon et al. 2010), with 1000 bootstrap replicates, while BI was performed using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm in MrBayes v.3.0 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Two MCMC chains, started from random trees for 1,000,000 generations and trees, were sampled every 100th generation, resulting in a total of 10,000 trees. The first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in of each analysis. Branches with significant Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) were estimated in the remaining 7500 trees. Phylogenetic trees were viewed with FigTree v.1.3.1 (Rambaut and Drummond 2010) and processed by Adobe Illustrator CS5. The nucleotide sequence data of the new taxa were deposited in GenBank (Table 1). The multilocus sequence alignments were deposited in TreeBASE (www.treebase.org) as accession S30780.
Table 1.
Isolates and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses of Diaporthe.
| Species | Isolate | GenBank accession numbers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS | cal | his3 | tef1 | tub2 | ||
| Diaportheacaciigena | CBS 129521 | KC343005 | KC343247 | KC343489 | KC343731 | KC343973 |
| Diaportheacericola | MFLUCC 17-0956 | KY964224 | KY964137 | NA | KY964180 | KY964074 |
| Diaportheacerigena | CFCC 52554 | MH121489 | MH121413 | MH121449 | MH121531 | NA |
| Diaportheacuta | PSCG 047 | MK626957 | MK691125 | MK726161 | MK654802 | MK691225 |
| Diaportheacutispora | LC6161 | KX986764 | KX999274 | KX999235 | KX999155 | KX999195 |
| Diaportheaestuarium | BRIP 59930a | OM918686 | NA | NA | OM960595 | OM960613 |
| Diaporthealangii | CFCC 52556 | MH121491 | MH121415 | MH121451 | MH121533 | MH121573 |
| Diaporthealbosinensis | CFCC 53066 | MK432659 | MK442979 | MK443004 | MK578133 | MK578059 |
| Diaporthealleghaniensis | CBS 495.72 | KC343007 | KC343249 | KC343491 | KC343733 | KC343975 |
| Diaportheambigua | CBS 114015 | KC343010 | KC343252 | KC343494 | KC343736 | KC343978 |
| Diaportheampelina | STE-U 2660 | AF230751 | AY745026 | NA | AY745056 | JX275452 |
| Diaportheamygdali | CBS 126679 | MH864208 | KC343264 | KC343506 | KC343748 | KC343990 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.chongqingensis | PSCG 435 | MK626916 | MK691209 | MK726257 | MK654866 | MK691321 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.fusicola | CGMCC 3.17087 | KF576281 | KF576233 | NA | KF576256 | KF576305 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.garethjonesii | MFLUCC 12-0542a | KT459423 | KT459470 | NA | KT459457 | KT459441 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.kadsurae | CFCC 52586 | MH121521 | MH121439 | MH121479 | MH121563 | MH121600 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.mediterranea | SAUCC194.111 | MT822639 | MT855718 | MT855606 | MT855836 | MT855951 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.ovoicicola | CGMCC 3.17093 | KF576265 | KF576223 | NA | KF576240 | KF576289 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.sterilis | CBS 136969 | KJ160579 | KJ160548 | MF418350 | KJ160611 | KJ160528 |
| Diaportheamygdali syn. D.ternstroemiae | CGMCC 3.15183 | KC153098 | NA | NA | KC153089 | NA |
| Diaportheanacardii | CBS 720.97 | KC343024 | KC343266 | KC343508 | KC343750 | KC343992 |
| Diaportheangelicae | CBS 111592 | KC343027 | KC343269 | KC343511 | KC343753 | KC343995 |
| Diaportheannellsiae | BRIP 59731a | OM918687 | NA | NA | OM960596 | OM960614 |
| Diaportheapiculata | CFCC 53068 | MK432651 | MK442973 | MK442998 | MK578127 | MK578054 |
| Diaportheaquatica | IFRDCC 3051 | JQ797437 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Diaporthearctii | DP0482 | KJ590736 | KJ612133 | KJ659218 | KJ590776 | KJ610891 |
| Diaporthearecae | CBS 161.64 | KC343032 | KC343274 | KC343516 | KC343758 | KC344000 |
| Diaporthearengae | CBS 114979 | KC343034 | KC343276 | KC343518 | KC343760 | KC344002 |
| Diaportheaseana | MFLUCC 12-0299a | KT459414 | KT459464 | NA | KT459448 | KT459432 |
| Diaportheasheicola | CBS 136967 | KJ160562 | KJ160542 | NA | KJ160594 | KJ160518 |
| Diaportheaspalathi | CBS 117169 | KC343036 | KC343278 | KC343520 | KC343762 | KC344004 |
| Diaportheaustralafricana | CBS 111886 | KC343038 | KC343280 | KC343522 | KC343764 | KC344006 |
| Diaportheaustraliana | CBS 146457 | MN708222 | NA | NA | MN696522 | MN696530 |
| Diaportheaustralpacifica | BRIP 60163d | OM918688 | NA | NA | OM960597 | OM960615 |
| Diaporthebaccae | CBS 136972 | KJ160565 | MG281695 | MF418264 | KJ160597 | MF418509 |
| Diaporthebatatas | CBS 122.21 | KC343040 | KC343282 | KC343524 | KC343766 | KC344008 |
| Diaporthebauhiniae | CFCC 53071 | MK432648 | MK442970 | MK442995 | MK578124 | MK578051 |
| Diaporthebeasleyi | BRIP 59326a | OM918689 | NA | NA | OM960598 | OM960616 |
| Diaporthebeilharziae | BRIP 54792 | JX862529 | NA | NA | JX862535 | KF170921 |
| Diaporthebenedicti | SBen914 | KM669929 | KM669862 | NA | KM669785 | NA |
| Diaporthebetulae | CFCC 50469 | KT732950 | KT732997 | KT732999 | KT733016 | KT733020 |
| Diaporthebetulicola | CFCC 51128 | KX024653 | KX024659 | KX024661 | KX024655 | KX024657 |
| Diaporthebetulina | CFCC 52560 | MH121495 | MH121419 | MH121455 | MH121537 | MH121577 |
| Diaporthebiconispora | ZJUD62 | KJ490597 | NA | KJ490539 | KJ490476 | KJ490418 |
| Diaporthebiguttulata | ZJUD47 | KJ490582 | NA | KJ490524 | KJ490461 | KJ490403 |
| CFCC 52584 | MH121519 | MH121437 | MH121477 | MH121561 | MH121598 | |
| Diaporthebohemiae | CBS 143347 | MG281015 | MG281710 | MG281361 | MG281536 | MG281188 |
| Diaporthebounty | BRIP 59361a | OM918690 | NA | NA | OM960599 | OM960617 |
| Diaporthebrasiliensis | CBS 133183 | KC343042 | KC343284 | KC343526 | KC343768 | KC344010 |
| Diaporthebreyniae | CBS 148910 | ON400846 | ON409189 | ON409187 | ON409188 | ON409186 |
| Diaporthebrumptoniae | BRIP 59403a | OM918702 | NA | NA | OM960611 | OM960629 |
| Diaporthecaatingaensis | URM7486 | KY085927 | KY115597 | KY115605 | KY115603 | KY115600 |
| Diaporthecamelliae-sinensis | SAUCC194.92 | MT822620 | MT855699 | MT855588 | MT855932 | MT855817 |
| Diaporthecamelliae-oleiferae | HNZZ027 | MZ509555 | MZ504685 | MZ504696 | MZ504707 | MZ504718 |
| Diaporthecanthii | CPC 19740 | JX069864 | KC843174 | NA | KC843120 | KC843230 |
| Diaporthecarriae | BRIP 59932a | OM918691 | NA | NA | OM960600 | OM960618 |
| Diaporthecaryae | CFCC 52563 | MH121498 | MH121422 | MH121458 | MH121540 | MH121580 |
| Diaporthecassines | CPC 21916 | KF777155 | NA | NA | KF777244 | NA |
| Diaporthecaulivora | CBS 127268 | MH864501 | KC343287 | KC343529 | KC343771 | KC344013 |
| Diaporthecelticola | CFCC 53074 | MK573948 | MK574587 | MK574603 | MK574623 | MK574643 |
| Diaporthecercidis | CFCC 52565 | MH121500 | MH121424 | MH121460 | MH121542 | MH121582 |
| Diaporthechamaeropis | CBS 454.81 | KC343048 | KC343290 | KC343532 | KC343774 | KC344016 |
| Diaporthecharlesworthii | BRIP 54884m | KJ197288 | NA | NA | KJ197250 | KJ197268 |
| Diaporthechiangmaiensis | MFLU 18-1305 | OK393702 | NA | NA | OL439482 | OK490918 |
| Diaporthechrysalidocarpi | SAUCC194.35 | MT822563 | MT855646 | MT855532 | MT855760 | MT855876 |
| Diaporthecichorii | MFLUCC 17-1023 | KY964220 | KY964133 | NA | KY964176 | KY964104 |
| Diaporthecinnamomi | CFCC 52569 | MH121504 | NA | MH121464 | MH121546 | MH121586 |
| Diaporthecissampeli | CPC 27302 | KX228273 | NA | KX228366 | NA | KX228384 |
| Diaporthecitri | AR3405 | KC843311 | KC843157 | KJ420881 | KC843071 | KC843187 |
| Diaporthechensiensis | CFCC 52567 | MH121502 | MH121426 | MH121462 | MH121544 | MH121584 |
| Diaporthecitriasiana | CGMCC 3.15224 | JQ954645 | KC357491 | KJ490515 | JQ954663 | KC357459 |
| Diaporthecitrichinensis | CGMCC 3.15225 | JQ954648 | KC357494 | KJ420880 | JQ954666 | KJ490396 |
| Diaporthecollariana | MFLU 17-2770 | MG806115 | MG783042 | NA | MG783040 | MG783041 |
| Diaporthecompactum | LC3083 | KP267854 | NA | KP293508 | KP267928 | KP293434 |
| Diaportheconica | CFCC 52571 | MH121506 | MH121428 | MH121466 | MH121548 | MH121588 |
| Diaportheconvolvuli | CBS 124654 | KC343054 | KC343296 | KC343538 | KC343780 | KC344022 |
| Diaporthecoryli | CFCC 53083 | MK432661 | MK442981 | MK443006 | MK578135 | MK578061 |
| Diaporthecrotalariae | CBS 162.33 | MH855395 | JX197439 | KC343540 | GQ250307 | KC344024 |
| Diaporthecrousii | CAA 823 | MK792311 | MK883835 | MK871450 | MK828081 | MK837932 |
| Diaporthecucurbitae | DAOM 42078 | KM453210 | NA | KM453212 | KM453211 | KP118848 |
| Diaporthecuppatea | CBS 117499 | MH863021 | KC343299 | KC343541 | KC343783 | KC344025 |
| Diaporthecynaroidis | CBS 122676 | KC343058 | KC343300 | KC343542 | KC343784 | KC344026 |
| Diaporthecytosporella | FAU461 | KC843307 | KC843141 | MF418283 | KC843116 | KC843221 |
| Diaporthediospyricola | CPC 21169 | KF777156 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Diaporthediscoidispora | ZJUD89 | KJ490624 | NA | KJ490566 | KJ490503 | KJ490445 |
| Diaporthedorycnii | MFLUCC 17-1015 | KY964215 | NA | NA | KY964171 | KY964099 |
| Diaporthedrenthii | CBS 146453 | MN708229 | NA | NA | MN696526 | MN696537 |
| Diaporthedurionigena | VTCC 930005 | MN453530 | NA | NA | MT276157 | MT276159 |
| Diaportheelaeagni-glabrae | LC4802 | KX986779 | KX999281 | KX999251 | KX999171 | KX999212 |
| Diaportheendophytica | CBS 133811 | KC343065 | KC343307 | KC343549 | KC343791 | KC344033 |
| Diaportheeres | AR5193 | KJ210529 | KJ434999 | KJ420850 | KJ210550 | KJ420799 |
| Diaportheetinsideae | BRIP 64096a | OM918692 | NA | NA | OM960601 | OM960619 |
| Diaportheeucalyptorum | CBS 132525 | MH305525 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Diaporthefoeniculacea | CBS 111553 | KC343101 | KC343343 | KC343585 | KC343827 | KC344069 |
| Diaporthefraxini-angustifoliae | BRIP 54781 | JX862528 | NA | NA | JX862534 | KF170920 |
| Diaporthefraxinicola | CFCC 52582 | MH121517 | MH121435 | NA | MH121559 | NA |
| Diaporthefructicola | MAFF 246408 | LC342734 | LC342738 | LC342737 | LC342735 | LC342736 |
| Diaporthefulvicolor | PSCG 051 | MK626859 | MK691132 | MK726163 | MK654806 | MK691236 |
| Diaportheganjae | CBS 180.91 | KC343112 | KC343354 | KC343596 | KC343838 | KC344080 |
| Diaportheganzhouensis | CFCC 53087 | MK432665 | MK442985 | MK443010 | MK578139 | MK578065 |
| Diaporthegoulteri | BRIP 55657a | KJ197290 | NA | NA | KJ197252 | KJ197270 |
| Diaporthegossiae | BRIP 59730a | OM918693 | NA | NA | OM960602 | OM960620 |
| Diaporthegrandiflori | SAUCC194.84 | MT822612 | MT855691 | MT855580 | MT855809 | MT855924 |
| Diaporthegriceae | BRIP 67014a | OM918694 | NA | NA | OM960603 | OM960621 |
| Diaportheguangxiensis | JZB320087 | MK335765 | MK736720 | NA | MK500161 | MK523560 |
| Diaporthegulyae | BRIP 54025 | JF431299 | NA | NA | JN645803 | KJ197271 |
| Diaportheguttulata | CGMCC 3.20100 | MT385950 | MW022470 | MW022491 | MT424685 | MT424705 |
| Diaporthehainanenesis | HNCM049 | OR647684 | NA | OR671936 | OR671944 | OR671952 |
| HNCM050 | OR647685 | NA | OR671937 | OR671945 | OR671953 | |
| HNCM051 | OR647686 | NA | OR671938 | OR671946 | OR671954 | |
| HNCM052 | OR647687 | NA | OR671939 | OR671947 | OR671955 | |
| Diaporthehelianthi | CBS 592.81 | KC343115 | KC343357 | KC343599 | KC343841 | KC344083 |
| Diaportheheliconiae | SAUCC194.77 | MT822605 | MT855684 | MT855573 | MT855802 | MT855917 |
| Diaportheheterophyllae | CPC 26215 | MG600222 | MG600218 | MG600220 | MG600224 | MG600226 |
| Diaportheheterostemmatis | SAUCC194.85 | MT822613 | MT855692 | MT855581 | MT855810 | MT855925 |
| Diaporthehickoriae | CBS 145.26 | KC343118 | KC343360 | KC343620 | KC343844 | KC344086 |
| Diaporthehispaniae | CBS 143351 | MG281123 | MG281820 | MG281471 | MG281644 | MG281296 |
| Diaporthehongkongensis | CBS 115448 | KC343119 | KC343361 | KC343603 | KC343845 | KC344087 |
| Diaporthehowardiae | BRIP 59697a | OM918695 | NA | NA | OM960604 | OM960622 |
| Diaporthehubeiensis | JZB320123 | MK335809 | MK500235 | NA | MK523570 | MK500148 |
| Diaporthehunanensis | HNZZ023 | MZ509550 | MZ504680 | MZ504691 | MZ504702 | MZ504713 |
| Diaportheincompleta | LC6754 | KX986794 | KX999289 | KX999265 | KX999186 | KX999226 |
| Diaportheinconspicua | CBS 133813 | KC343123 | KC343365 | KC343607 | KC343849 | KC344091 |
| Diaportheinfecunda | CBS 133812 | KC343126 | KC343368 | KC343610 | KC343852 | KC344094 |
| Diaportheirregularis | CGMCC 3.20092 | MT385951 | MT424721 | NA | MT424686 | MT424706 |
| Diaportheisoberliniae | CPC 22549 | KJ869190 | NA | NA | NA | KJ869245 |
| Diaporthejuglandicola | CFCC 51134 | KU985101 | KX024616 | KX024622 | KX024628 | KX024634 |
| Diaporthekochmanii | BRIP 54033 | JF431295 | NA | NA | JN645809 | NA |
| Diaporthekongii | BRIP 54031 | JF431301 | NA | NA | JN645797 | KJ197272 |
| Diaporthekrabiensis | MFLUCC 17-2481 | MN047100 | NA | NA | MN433215 | MN431495 |
| Diaporthelenispora | CGMCC 3.20101 | MT385952 | MW022472 | MW022493 | MT424687 | MT424707 |
| Diaporthelitchicola | BRIP 54900 | JX862533 | NA | NA | JX862539 | KF170925 |
| Diaporthelitchii | SAUCC194.22 | MT822550 | MT855635 | MT855519 | MT855747 | MT855863 |
| Diaporthelithocarpi | CGMCC 3.15175 | KC135104 | KF576235 | NA | KC153095 | KF576311 |
| Diaporthelongicolla | FAU599 | KJ590728 | KJ612124 | KJ659188 | KJ590767 | KJ610883 |
| Diaporthelongispora | CBS 194.36 | MH855769 | KC343377 | KC343619 | KC343861 | KC344103 |
| Diaporthelovelaceae | BRIP 60163a | OM918696 | NA | NA | OM960605 | OM960623 |
| Diaporthelusitanicae | CBS 123212 | MH863279 | KC343378 | KC343620 | KC343862 | KC344104 |
| Diaporthelutescens | SAUCC194.36 | MT822564 | MT855647 | MT855533 | MT855761 | MT855877 |
| Diaporthemacadamiae | CBS 146455 | MN708230 | NA | NA | MN696528 | MN696539 |
| Diaporthemacintoshii | BRIP 55064a | KJ197289 | NA | NA | KJ197251 | KJ197269 |
| Diaporthemalorum | CAA 734 | KY435638 | KY435658 | KY435648 | KY435627 | KY435668 |
| Diaporthemarina | MFLU 17-2622 | MN047102 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Diaporthemasirevicii | BRIP 54256 | KJ197276 | NA | NA | KJ197238 | KJ197256 |
| Diaporthemayteni | CBS 133185 | KC343139 | KC343381 | KC343623 | KC343865 | KC344107 |
| Diaporthemaytenicola | CPC 21896 | KF777157 | NA | NA | NA | KF777250 |
| Diaporthemclennaniae | BRIP 60072a | OM918697 | NA | NA | OM960606 | OM960624 |
| Diaporthemelastomatis | SAUCC194.55 | MT822583 | MT855664 | MT855551 | MT855780 | MT855896 |
| Diaporthemelonis | CBS 435.87 | KC343141 | KC343383 | KC343625 | KC343867 | KC344109 |
| Diaporthemiddletonii | BRIP 54884e | KJ197286 | NA | NA | KJ197248 | KJ197266 |
| Diaportheminima | CGMCC 3.20097 | MT385953 | MT424722 | MW022496 | MT424688 | MT424708 |
| Diaportheminusculata | CGMCC 3.20098 | MT385957 | MW022475 | MW022499 | MT424692 | MT424712 |
| Diaporthemiriciae | BRIP 54736j | KJ197282 | NA | NA | KJ197244 | KJ197262 |
| Diaporthemonetii | MF-Ha18-048 | MW008493 | MZ671938 | MZ671964 | MW008515 | MW008504 |
| Diaporthemoriniae | BRIP 60190a | OM918698 | NA | NA | OM960607 | OM960625 |
| Diaporthemultigutullata | CFCC 53095 | MK432645 | MK442967 | MK442992 | MK578121 | MK578048 |
| Diaporthemusigena | CBS 129519 | KC343143 | KC343385 | KC343267 | KC343869 | KC344111 |
| Diaporthemyracrodruonis | URM 7972 | MK205289 | MK205290 | NA | MK213408 | MK205291 |
| Diaportheneoarctii | CBS 109490 | KC343145 | KC343387 | KC343629 | KC343871 | KC344113 |
| Diaportheneoraonikayaporum | MFLUCC 14-1136 | KU712449 | KU749356 | NA | KU749369 | KU743988 |
| Diaporthenorfolkensis | BRIP 59718a | OM918699 | NA | NA | OM960608 | OM960626 |
| Diaporthenothofagi | BRIP 54801 | JX862530 | NA | NA | JX862536 | KF170922 |
| Diaporthenovem | CBS 127269 | KC343155 | KC343397 | KC343639 | KC343881 | KC344123 |
| Diaportheocoteae | CPC 26217 | KX228293 | NA | NA | NA | KX228388 |
| Diaportheoraccinii | LC3166 | KP267863 | NA | KP293517 | KP267937 | KP293443 |
| Diaportheovalispora | ZJUD93 | KJ490628 | NA | KJ490570 | KJ490507 | KJ490449 |
| Diaportheoxe | CBS 133186 | KC343164 | KC343406 | KC343648 | KC343890 | KC344132 |
| Diaporthepadina | CFCC 52590 | MH121525 | MH121443 | MH121483 | MH121567 | MH121604 |
| Diaporthepandanicola | MFLUCC 17-0607 | MG646974 | NA | NA | NA | MG646930 |
| Diaportheparanensis | CBS 133184 | KC343171 | KC343413 | KC343655 | KC343897 | KC344139 |
| Diaportheparapterocarpi | CPC 22729 | KJ869138 | NA | NA | NA | KJ869248 |
| Diaportheparvae | PSCG 035 | MK626920 | MK691169 | MK726211 | MK654859 | MK691249 |
| Diaporthepascoei | BRIP 54847 | JX862538 | NA | NA | JX862538 | KF170924 |
| Diaporthepassiflorae | CPC 19183 | JX069860 | KY435644 | KY435654 | KY435623 | KY435674 |
| Diaporthepassifloricola | CPC 27480 | KX228292 | NA | KX228367 | NA | KX228387 |
| Diaporthepenetriteum | LC3215 | KP267879 | NA | KP293532 | KP267953 | NA |
| Diaportheperjuncta | CBS 109745 | KC343172 | KC343414 | KC343656 | KC343898 | KC344140 |
| Diaportheperseae | CBS 151.73 | KC343173 | KC343415 | KC343657 | KC343899 | KC343141 |
| Diaporthepescicola | MFLUCC 16-0105 | KU557555 | KU557603 | NA | KU557623 | KU557579 |
| Diaporthephaseolorum | AR4203 | KJ590738 | KJ612135 | KJ659220 | KJ590739 | KJ610893 |
| Diaportheplatzii | BRIP 60353a | OM918700 | NA | NA | OM960609 | OM960627 |
| Diaporthephillipsii | CAA 817 | MK792305 | MK883831 | MK871445 | MK828076 | MN000351 |
| Diaporthepodocarpi-macrophylli | LC6155 | KX986774 | KX999278 | KX999246 | KX999167 | KX999207 |
| Diaporthepometiae | SAUCC194.72 | MT822600 | MT855679 | MT855568 | MT855797 | MT855912 |
| Diaporthepseudoalnea | CFCC 54190 | MZ727037 | MZ753468 | MZ781302 | MZ816343 | MZ753487 |
| Diaporthepseudofoliicola | HNCM045 | OR647680 | NA | OR671932 | OR671940 | OR671948 |
| HNCM046 | OR647681 | NA | OR671933 | OR671941 | OR671949 | |
| HNCM047 | OR647682 | NA | OR671934 | OR671942 | OR671950 | |
| HNCM048 | OR647683 | NA | OR671935 | OR671943 | OR671951 | |
| Diaporthepseudomangiferae | CBS 101339 | KC343181 | KC343423 | KC343665 | KC343907 | KC344149 |
| Diaporthepseudophoenicicola | CBS 176.77 | KC343183 | KC343425 | KC343667 | KC343909 | KC344151 |
| Diaporthepsoraleae | CPC 21634 | KF777158 | NA | NA | KF777245 | KF777251 |
| Diaporthepsoraleae-pinnatae | CPC 21638 | KF777159 | NA | NA | NA | KF777252 |
| Diaporthepterocarpi | CPC 22729 | JQ619899 | JX197451 | NA | JX275416 | JX275460 |
| Diaporthepterocarpicola | MFLUCC 10-0580a | JQ619887 | JX197433 | NA | JX275403 | JX275441 |
| Diaporthepungensis | SAUCC194.112 | MT822640 | MT855719 | MT855607 | MT855837 | MT855952 |
| Diaporthepyracanthae | CAA483 | KY435635 | KY435656 | KY435645 | KY435625 | KY435666 |
| Diaportheracemosae | CPC 26646 | MG600223 | MG600219 | MG600221 | MG600225 | MG600227 |
| Diaportheraonikayaporum | CBS 133182 | KC343188 | KC343430 | KC343672 | KC343914 | KC344156 |
| Diaportheravennica | MFLUCC 16-0997 | NA | NA | NA | MT394670 | NA |
| Diaportherhodomyrti | CFCC 53101 | MK432643 | MK442965 | MK442990 | MK578119 | MK578046 |
| Diaportherhusicola | CPC 18191 | JF951146 | KC843124 | NA | KC843100 | KC843205 |
| Diaportherosae | MFLUCC 17-2658 | MG828894 | MG829273 | NA | NA | MG843878 |
| Diaportherosiphthora | COAD 2914 | MT311197 | MT313691 | NA | MT313693 | NA |
| Diaportherossmaniae | CAA 762 | MK792290 | MK883822 | MK871432 | MK828063 | MK837914 |
| Diaportherostrata | CFCC 50062 | KP208847 | KP208849 | KP208851 | KP208853 | KP208855 |
| Diaportherudis | AR3422 | KC843331 | KC843146 | NA | KC843090 | KC843177 |
| Diaporthesaccarata | CBS 116311 | KC343190 | KC343432 | KC343674 | KC343916 | KC344158 |
| Diaporthesackstonii | BRIP 54669b | KJ197287 | NA | NA | KJ197249 | KJ197267 |
| Diaporthesalicicola | BRIP 54825 | JX862531 | NA | NA | JX862537 | KF170923 |
| Diaporthesambucusii | CFCC 51986 | KY852495 | KY852499 | KY852503 | KY852507 | KY852511 |
| Diaportheschimae | CFCC 53103 | MK442640 | MK442962 | MK442987 | MK578116 | MK578043 |
| Diaportheschini | CBS 133181 | KC343191 | KC343433 | KC343675 | KC343917 | KC344159 |
| Diaportheschisandrae | CFCC 51988 | KY852497 | KY852501 | KY852505 | KY852509 | KY852513 |
| Diaportheschoeni | MFLU 15-1279 | KY964226 | KY964139 | NA | KY964182 | KY964109 |
| Diaporthesclerotioides | CBS 296.67 | MH858974 | KC343435 | KC343677 | KC343919 | KC344161 |
| Diaporthesearlei | BRIP 66528 | MN708231 | NA | NA | NA | MN696540 |
| Diaporthesennae | CFCC 51636 | KY203724 | KY228875 | NA | KY228885 | KY228891 |
| Diaporthesennicola | CFCC 51634 | KY203722 | KY228873 | KY228879 | KY228883 | KY228889 |
| Diaportheserafiniae | BRIP 55665a | KJ197274 | NA | NA | KJ197236 | KJ197254 |
| Diaportheshaanxiensis | CFCC 53106 | MK432654 | MK442976 | MK443001 | MK578130 | NA |
| Diaportheshawiae | BRIP 64534a | OM918701 | NA | NA | OM960610 | OM960628 |
| Diaporthesiamensis | MFLUCC 10-0573a | JQ619879 | JX197423 | NA | JX275393 | JX275429 |
| Diaporthesilvicola | CFCC 54191 | MZ727041 | MZ753472 | MZ753481 | MZ816347 | MZ753491 |
| Diaporthesojae | FAU635 | KJ590719 | KJ612116 | KJ659208 | KJ590762 | KJ610875 |
| Diaporthespinosa | PSCG 383 | MK626849 | MK691129 | MK726156 | MK654811 | MK691234 |
| Diaporthestictica | CBS 370.54 | KC343212 | KC343454 | KC343696 | KC343938 | KC344180 |
| Diaporthesubclavata | ZJUD95 | KJ490630 | NA | KJ490572 | KJ490509 | KJ490451 |
| Diaporthesubcylindrospora | KUMCC 17-0151 | MG746629 | NA | NA | MG746630 | MG746631 |
| Diaporthesubellipicola | KUMCC 17-0153 | MG746632 | NA | NA | MG746633 | MG746634 |
| Diaporthesubordinaria | CBS 464.90 | KC343214 | KC343456 | KC343698 | KC343940 | KC344182 |
| Diaporthetaoicola | MFLUCC 16-0117 | KU557567 | NA | NA | KU557635 | KU557591 |
| Diaporthetectonae | MFLUCC 12-0777 | KU712430 | KU749345 | NA | KU749359 | KU743977 |
| Diaporthetectonendophytica | MFLUCC 13-0471 | KU712439 | KU749354 | NA | KU749367 | KU743986 |
| Diaporthetectonigena | MFLUCC 12-0767 | KX986782 | KX999284 | KX999254 | KX999174 | KX999214 |
| Diaportheterebinthifolii | CBS 133180 | KC343216 | KC343458 | KC343700 | KC343942 | KC344184 |
| Diaporthethunbergii | MFLUCC 10-0576a | JQ619893 | JX197440 | NA | JX275409 | JX275449 |
| Diaporthethunbergiicola | MFLUCC 12-0033 | KP715097 | NA | NA | KP715098 | NA |
| Diaporthetibetensis | CFCC 51999 | MF279843 | MF279888 | MF279828 | MF279858 | MF279873 |
| Diaporthetulliensis | BRIP 62248a | KR936130 | NA | NA | KR936133 | KR936132 |
| Diaporthetrevorrowii | BRIP 70737a | OM918703 | NA | NA | OM960612 | OM960630 |
| Diaportheueckerae | FAU656 | KJ590726 | KJ612122 | KJ659215 | KJ590747 | KJ610881 |
| Diaportheukurunduensis | CFCC 52592 | MH121527 | MH121445 | MH121485 | MH121569 | NA |
| Diaportheundulata | LC6624 | KX986798 | NA | KX999269 | KX999190 | KX999230 |
| Diaportheunshiuensis | CFCC 52594 | MH121529 | MH121447 | MH121487 | MH121571 | MH121606 |
| CFCC 52595 | MH121530 | MH121448 | MH121488 | MH121572 | MH121607 | |
| Diaporthevaccinii | CBS 160.32 | KC343228 | KC343470 | KC343712 | KC343954 | KC343196 |
| Diaporthevangoghii | MF-Ha18-045 | MW008491 | MZ671936 | MZ671962 | MW008513 | MW008502 |
| Diaporthevangueriae | CBS 137985 | KJ869137 | NA | NA | NA | KJ869247 |
| Diaporthevawdreyi | BRIP 57887a | KR936126 | NA | NA | KR936129 | KR936128 |
| Diaporthevelutina | LC4421 | KX986790 | NA | KX999261 | KX999182 | KX999223 |
| Diaportheverniciicola | CFCC 53109 | MK573944 | MK574583 | MK574599 | MK574619 | MK574639 |
| Diaportheviniferae | JZB320071 | MK341551 | MK500119 | NA | MK500107 | MK500112 |
| Diaporthevirgiliae | CMW 40748 | KP247556 | NA | NA | NA | KP247575 |
| Diaporthexishuangbanica | LC6707 | KX986783 | NA | KX999255 | KX999175 | KX999216 |
| Diaporthexunwuensis | CFCC 53085 | MK432663 | MK442983 | MK443008 | MK578137 | MK578063 |
| Diaportheyunnanensis | LC6168 | KX986796 | KX999290 | KX999267 | KX999188 | KX999228 |
| Diaporthezaobaisu | PSCG 031 | MK626922 | NA | MK726207 | MK654855 | MK691245 |
| Diaporthellacorylina | CBS 121124 | KC343004 | KC343246 | KC343488 | KC343730 | KC343972 |
Note: NA, not applicable. Strains in this study are marked in bold.
Results
Phylogenetic analyses
The five-gene sequence dataset (ITS, cal, his3, tef1 and tub2) was analysed to infer the interspecific relationships within Diaporthe. The dataset consisted of 259 sequences including the outgroup taxon, Diaporthellacorylina (CBS 121124). A total of 2909 characters including gaps (528 for ITS, 608 for cal, 563 for his3, 646 for tef1 and 564 for tub2) were included in the phylogenetic analysis. The best nucleotide substitution model for ITS, his3 and tub2 was TrN+I+G, while HKY+I+G was selected for both cal and tef1. The topologies resulting from ML and BI analyses of the concatenated dataset were congruent (Fig. 1). According to the phylogenetic tree, D.hainanensis and D.pseudofoliicola are new to science, based on the distinct and well-supported molecular phylogenetic placement with their closest described relatives. Phylogenetically, D.pseudofoliicola clustered together with D.longicolla and D.unshiuensis. Diaporthehainanensis clustered together with D.cercidis and D.guangxiensis.
Figure 1.
Phylogram of Diaporthe resulting from a Maximum Likelihood analysis, based on combined ITS, cal, his3, tef1 and tub2. Numbers above the branches indicate ML bootstraps (left, ML BS ≥ 50%) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (right, BPP ≥ 0.9). The tree is rooted with Diaporthellacorylina. Isolates in the current study are in blue. “-” indicates ML BS < 50% or BI PP < 0.9.
Taxonomy
. Diaporthe hainanensis
Q. Yang sp. nov.
83930BD8-3D80-589A-999F-7AE9D5CBC803
MycoBank No: 848328
Figure 2.
Diaporthehainanensis (HNCM049) A culture on PNAB, C conidiomata D conidiogenous cells E alpha conidia F beta conidia. Scale bars: 500 μm (B, C); 10 μm (C, F), 20 μm (E).
Diagnosis.
Distinguished from D.cercidis in narrower alpha conidia; from D.guangxiensis in shorter beta conidia.
Etymology.
In reference to the Hainan Province, from where the fungus was first collected.
Description.
Asexual morph: Conidiomata on PNA pycnidial, globose or rostrated, black, erumpent in tissue, erumpent at maturity, 450–600 μm diam., often with pale yellowish conidial drops exuding from the ostioles. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells (10.5–)14.5–20(–21.5) × 1.4–1.8 μm (n = 30), aseptate, cylindrical, phialidic, straight or slightly curved. Alpha conidia (5.5–)7–8(–8.5) × 2.1–2.9 μm (n = 30), aseptate, hyaline, ellipsoidal, biguttulate. Beta conidia (21.5–)23–25 × 1.1 µm (n = 30), hyaline, aseptate, filiform, sinuous at one end, eguttulate.
Culture characters.
Culture incubated on PNA at 25 °C, originally white, fluffy aerial mycelium, becoming pale yellow with age, with visible solitary conidiomata pine needles after 15 days.
Specimens examined.
China. Hainan Province: Chengmai County, on leaves of Camelliaoleifera, 19°34'10"N, 110°18'09"E, 25 July 2022, Q. Yang (holotype CSUFT055; ex-type living culture: HNCM049; other living cultures: HNCM050, HNCM051 and HNCM052).
Notes.
Four isolates representing D.hainanensis cluster in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) and appear most closely related to D.cercidis on Cercischinensis and D.guangxiensis on Macadamia sp. Diaporthehainanensis can be distinguished from D.cercidis, based on ITS, his3, tef1and tub2 loci (13/458 in ITS, 5/455 in his3, 33/341 in tef1 and 5/401 in tub2); from D.guangxiensis, based on ITS, tef1 and tub2 loci (5/457 in ITS, 2/339 in tef1 and 16/403 in tub2). Morphologically, D.hainanensis differs from D.cercidis in narrower alpha conidia (2.1–2.9 μm vs. 3–3.5 μm) (Yang et al. 2018); from D.guangxiensis in shorter beta conidia (23–25 μm vs. 20–32 μm) (Manawasinghe et al. 2019).
. Diaporthe pseudofoliicola
Q. Yang sp. nov.
054C182C-E989-566D-B604-3EF72EBC4C53
MycoBank No: 848327
Figure 3.
Diaporthepseudofoliicola (HNCM045) A culture on PDAB, C conidiomata D conidiogenous cells E alpha and beta conidia. Scale bars: 200 μm (B, C), 10 μm (D), 20 μm (E).
Diagnosis.
Distinguished from D.longicolla in having smaller alpha conidia; from D.unshiuensis in having narrower conidiophores.
Etymology.
The epithet “pseudofoliicola” refers to its habitat similar to Diaporthefoliicola.
Description.
Asexual morph: Conidiomata on PDA pycnidial, 190–330 μm in diam., superficial, scattered on PDA, dark brown to black, globose, solitary or clustered in groups of 1–3 pycnidia. Pale yellow conidial drops exuding from ostioles. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells (10.5–)12.5–18(–22) × 1.3–1.5 μm (n = 30), phialidic, aseptate, cylindrical, straight, densely aggregated, terminal, slightly tapered towards the apex. Alpha conidia 5–6.5(–7) × 2.3–3.0 μm (n = 30), aseptate, hyaline, ellipsoidal to fusiform, biguttulate, both ends obtuse. Beta conidia (27.5–)30–33(–35.5) × 1.2–1.4 µm (n = 30), hyaline, aseptate, filiform, sinuous at one end, eguttulate.
Culture characters.
Culture incubated on PDA at 25 °C, originally flat with white fluffy aerial mycelium, becoming pale brown due to pigment formation, with yellowish-cream conidial drops exuding from the ostioles after 20 days.
Specimens examined.
China. Hainan Province: Chengmai County, on leaves of Camelliaoleifera, 110°15'16"E, 19°23'20"N, 25 July 2022, Q. Yang (holotype CSUFT050; ex-type living culture: HNCM045; other living cultures: HNCM046, HNCM047 and HNCM048).
Notes.
Four isolates representing D.pseudofoliicola cluster in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) and appear most closely related to D.longicolla on Glycinemax and D.unshiuensis on Citrusunshiu. Diaporthepseudofoliicola can be distinguished from D.longicolla, based on ITS, tef1 and tub2 loci (9/462 in ITS, 16/318 in tef1 and 4/444 in tub2); from D.unshiuensis, based on his3 and tef1 loci (51/457 in his3 and 17/318 in tef1). Morphologically, D.pseudofoliicola differs from D.longicolla in having smaller alpha conidia (5–6.5 × 2.3–3.0 μm vs. 6.9–7.2 × 1.6–2.8 μm) (Santos et al. 2011); from D.unshiuensis in having narrower conidiophores (1.3–1.5 μm vs. 1.4–2.6 μm) (Huang et al. 2015).
Discussion
In this study, an important oil-tea tree species, Camelliaoleifera was investigated and Camellia leaf disease was found as a common disease in plantations in Hainan Province. Identification of our collections was conducted, based on isolates from symptomatic leaves of C.oleifera using five combined loci (ITS, cal, his3, tef1 and tub2), as well as morphological characters. Two new Diaporthe species were described, i.e. D.hainanensis and D.pseudofoliicola.
According to the USDA Fungal-host interaction database, there are six records of Diaporthe species associated with C.oleifera (https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases; accessed on 18 Sep 2023). These records are related to the following six Diaporthe species: D.eres, D.camelliae-oleiferae, D.hubeiensis, D.hunanensis, D.huangshanensis and D.sojae (Zhou and Hou 2019; Yang et al. 2021). Diaportheeres, the type species of the genus, was described by Nitschke (1870) on Ulmus sp. collected in Germany, which has a widespread distribution and a broad host range as pathogens, endophytes or saprobes (Udayanga et al. 2014). Diaportheeres differs from D.pseudofoliicola and D.hainanensis in having wider alpha conidia (3–4 μm in D.eres vs. 2.3–3.0 μm in D.pseudofoliicola vs. 2.1–2.9 μm in D.hainanensis) (Gomes et al. 2013); D.huangshanensis differs from D.pseudofoliicola in having shorter beta conidia (19.5–30 μm vs. 30–33 μm); from D.hainanensis in having wider alpha conidia (2.7–4.5 μm vs. 2.1–2.9 μm) (Zhou and Hou 2019). Yang et al. (2021) recorded four Diaporthe species, D.camelliae-oleiferae, D.hubeiensis, D.hunanensis and D.sojae, which were isolated from Camelliaoleifera in Hunan Province and which can be distinguished from D.pseudofoliicola and D.hainanensis, based on DNA sequence data (Fig. 1).
As the species concept of Diaporthe has been greatly improved by using molecular data (Huang et al. 2015; Gao et al. 2016, 2017; Guarnaccia and Crous 2017; Guarnaccia et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2018, 2020, 2021; Manawasinghe et al. 2019; Guo et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2021; Cao et al. 2022; Bai et al. 2023; Zhu et al. 2023), many new species have been discovered and reported in recent years. In this study, the Diaporthe isolates from C.oleifera were identified, based on sequence analysis and morphological characteristics. Future studies should focus on pathogenicity, epidemiology and fungicide sensitivity of the important plant fungal pathogen to develop effective management of C.oleifera disease and on the pathogenic molecular mechanism.
Supplementary Material
Citation
Liu HY, Luo D, Huang HL, Yang Q (2024) Two new species of Diaporthe (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) associated with Camellia oleifera leaf spot disease in Hainan Province, China. MycoKeys 102: 225–243. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.102.113412
Funding Statement
the Guilin Scientific Research [2022ZC] No. 27 and the introduction of talent research start-up fund project of CSUFT (Project No.: 2019YJ025)
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statement
No ethical statement was reported.
Funding
This study is financed by the Guilin Scientific Research [2022ZC] No. 27, the introduction of talent research start-up fund project of CSUFT (Project No.: 2019YJ025) and the Changsha Natural Science Foundation project (kq2202284).
Author contributions
Hong Y. Liu conceived and designed the study; Dun Luo ang Han L. Huang conducted the experiments; Qin Yang wrote the manuscript and revised.
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.
References
- Bai Y, Lin L, Pan M, Fan XL. (2023) Studies of Diaporthe (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) species associated with plant cankers in Beijing, China, with three new species described. MycoKeys 98: 59–86. 10.3897/mycokeys.98.104156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao L, Luo D, Lin W, Yang Q, Deng XJ. (2022) Four new species of Diaporthe (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) from forest plants in China. MycoKeys 91: 25–47. 10.3897/mycokeys.91.84970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbone I, Kohn LM. (1999) A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 3(3): 553–556. 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G. (2004a) MycoBank: An online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Studies in Mycology 50: 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Risède JM, Simoneau P, Hywel-Jones NL. (2004b) Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: Species with sphaeropedunculate vesicles. Studies in Mycology 50: 415–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772. 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desjardins P, Hansen JB, Allen M. (2009) Microvolume protein concentration determination using the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer. Journal of Visualized Experiments 33(33): 1–3. 10.3791/1610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diogo E, Santos JM, Phillips AJ. (2010) Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 44(1): 107–115. 10.1007/s13225-010-0057-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus (San Francisco, Calif. ) 12: 13–15. [Google Scholar]
- Fan XL, Hyde KD, Udayanga D, Wu XY, Tian CM. (2015) Diaportherostrata, a novel ascomycete from Juglansmandshurica associated with walnut dieback. Mycological Progress 14(10): 1–8. 10.1007/s11557-015-1104-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao YH, Liu F, Cai L. (2016) Unravelling Diaporthe species associated with Camellia. Systematics and Biodiversity 14(1): 102–117. 10.1080/14772000.2015.1101027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao YH, Liu F, Duan W, Crous PW, Cai L. (2017) Diaporthe is paraphyletic. IMA Fungus 8(1): 153–187. 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glass NL, Donaldson GC. (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61(4): 1323–1330. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes RR, Glienke C, Videira SIR, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. (2013) Diaporthe: A genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi. Persoonia 31(1): 1–41. 10.3767/003158513X666844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guarnaccia V, Crous PW. (2017) Emerging citrus diseases in Europe caused by species of Diaporthe. IMA Fungus 8(2): 317–334. 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.02.07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guarnaccia V, Crous PW. (2018) Species of Diaporthe on Camellia and Citrus in the Azores Islands. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 57: 307–319. 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-23254 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guarnaccia V, Groenewald JZ, Woodhall J, Armengol J, Cinelli T, Eichmeier A, Ezra D, Fontaine F, Gramaje D, Gutierrez-Aguirregabiria A, Kaliterna J, Kiss L, Larignon P, Luque J, Mugnai L, Naor V, Raposo R, Sándor E, Váczy KZ, Crous PW. (2018) Diaporthe diversity and pathogenicity revealed from a broad survey of grapevine diseases in Europe. Persoonia 40(1): 135–153. 10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo YS, Crous PW, Bai Q, Fu M, Yang MM, Wang XH, Du YM, Hong N, Xu WX, Wang GP. (2020) High diversity of Diaporthe species associated with pear shoot canker in China. Persoonia 45(1): 132–162. 10.3767/persoonia.2020.45.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall T. (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- Huang F, Udayanga D, Wang X, Hou X, Mei X, Fu Y, Hyde KD, Li HY. (2015) Endophytic Diaporthe associated with Citrus: A phylogenetic reassessment with seven new species from China. Fungal Biology 119(5): 331–347. 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang N, Voglmayr H, Piao CG, Li Y. (2021) Two new species of Diaporthe (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) associated with tree cankers in the Netherlands. MycoKeys 85: 31–56. 10.3897/mycokeys.85.73107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Toh H. (2010) Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26(15): 1899–1900. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lombard L, Van Leeuwen GCM, Guarnaccia V, Polizzi G, Van Rijswick PC, Karin Rosendahl KC, Gabler J, Crous PW. (2014) Diaporthe species associated with Vaccinium, with specific reference to Europe. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 53: 287–299. 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-14034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Manawasinghe IS, Dissanayake AJ, Li X, Liu M, Wanasinghe DN, Xu J, Zhao W, Zhang W, Zhou Y, Hyde KD, Brooks S, Yan J. (2019) High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 10: 1936. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Mostert L, Crous PW, Kang JC, Phillips AJ. (2001) Species of Phomopsis and a Libertella sp. occurring on grapevines with specific reference to South Africa: Morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterization. Mycologia 93(1): 146–167. 10.1080/00275514.2001.12061286 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nitschke T. (1870) Pyrenomycetes Germanici 2: 245. Breslau. Eduard Trewendt, Germany.
- O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7(1): 103–116. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A, Drummond A. (2010) FigTree v.1.3.1. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Rayner RW. (1970) A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, UK.
- Rehner SA, Uecker FA. (1994) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the coelomycete Phomopsis. Canadian Journal of Botany 72(11): 1666–1674. 10.1139/b94-204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19(12): 1572–1574. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos JM, Phillips AJL. (2009) Resolving the complex of Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species occurring on Foeniculumvulgare in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 34: 111–125. [Google Scholar]
- Santos JM, Vrandečić K, Ćosić J, Duvnjak T, Phillips AJL. (2011) Resolving the Diaporthe species occurring on soybean in Croatia. Persoonia 27(1): 9–19. 10.3767/003158511X603719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith H, Wingfeld MJ, Coutinho TA, Crous PW. (1996) Sphaeropsissapinea and Botryosphaeriadothidea endophytic in Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp. in South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 62(2): 86–88. 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30596-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Udayanga D, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD. (2014) Insights into the genus Diaporthe: Phylogenetic species delimitation in the D.eres species complex. Fungal Diversity 67(1): 203–229. 10.1007/s13225-014-0297-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Udayanga D, Liu X, McKenzie EH, Chukeatirote E, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD. (2011) The genus Phomopsis: Biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens. Fungal Diversity 50(1): 189–225. 10.1007/s13225-011-0126-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang WJ, Chen CG, Cheng J. (2007) The medicinal active role of tea oil in health care. Food and Nutrition in China 9: 48–51. 10.1002/mnfr.200700032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications 18: 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Q, Fan XL, Guarnaccia V, Tian CM. (2018) High diversity of Diaporthe species associated with dieback diseases in China, with twelve new species described. MycoKeys 39: 97–149. 10.3897/mycokeys.39.26914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Q, Jiang N, Tian CM. (2020) Three new Diaporthe species from Shaanxi Province, China. MycoKeys 67: 1–18. 10.3897/mycokeys.67.49483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Q, Tang J, Zhou GY. (2021) Characterization of Diaporthe species on Camelliaoleifera in Hunan Province, with descriptions of two new species. MycoKeys 84: 15–33. 10.3897/mycokeys.84.71701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou H, Hou CL. (2019) Three new species of Diaporthe from China based on morphological characters and DNA sequence data analyses. Phytotaxa 422(2): 157–174. 10.11646/phytotaxa.422.2.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu YQ, Ma CY, Xue H, Piao CG, Li Y, Jiang N. (2023) Two new species of Diaporthe (Diaporthaceae, Diaporthales) in China. MycoKeys 95: 209–228. 10.3897/mycokeys.95.98969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhuang RL. (2008) Camelliaoleifera. 2nd ed. China Forestry Press, Beijing.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.



