Abstract
Post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome is one of the causes of reduced functional capacity and work productivity, in particular for healthcare workers. The pathophysiology of the post COVID-19 syndrome is related to complex and multisystem inflammatory mechanisms, and cardiopulmonary exercise rehabilitation program is one of the efforts to improve the recovery process for patients with post COVID-19 syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the level of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with functional capacity (VO2max) in individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome who received moderate- and high-intensity supervised cardiopulmonary exercise. A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Integrated Cardiac Rehabilitation Center of Dr. Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The supervised cardiopulmonary exercise was conducted for six weeks according to the participant’s baseline VO2max. Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation tests were used to assess the correlations. A total of 30 individuals (19 and 11 had moderate and high intensity exercise, respectively) were involved in this study. At moderate intensity exercise, the average Hs-CRP and NLR were 3.3 mg/L and 1.99, respectively; while at high intensity, the values were 3.8 mg/L and 1.79, respectively. No significant correlation between Hs-CRP level and functional capacity in both moderate-intensity and high intensity groups. In contrast, NLR was negatively correlated with functional capacity (r=-0.545, p=0.016) in moderate intensity exercise group. In conclusion, NLR value was negatively correlated with functional capacity in individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome after receiving moderate intensity supervised cardiopulmonary exercise program. Therefore, moderate intensity of cardiopulmonary exercise maybe be used as a program to accelerate the recovery for those with post COVID-19 syndrome.
Keywords: Long COVID-19, cardiopulmonary exercise, functional capacity, Hs-CRP, NLR
Introduction
The chronic symptomatic form of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known as post-COVID-19 syndrome or post-COVID-19 syndrome [1]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) of the United Kingdom defined post-COVID-19 syndrome as symptoms persisting for >12 weeks while long COVID-19 as ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 lasting for 4– 12 weeks [2]. The symptoms of the post-COVID-19 syndrome represented organ damages that occurred during the acute phase of the illness. However, strong evidence was recently found that patients with mild or moderate acute symptoms of COVID-19 might still develop symptoms of unrelated to the organ dysfunctions that occurred during the acute phase [3].
Multisystem symptoms due to multiple organ injury in severe cases of COVID-19 mainly because the activation of the immune system indicated by increased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), and high acute phase reactants such as ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP) that are triggering a cytokine storm [4]. The level of serum CRP significantly correlated with the post-COVID syndrome [5]. A study reported that serum CRP levels could help to determine the prognosis and to evaluate disease improvement of COVID-19 [6]. CRP specificity value was higher than other biological markers, such as procalcitonin, D-dimer and ferritin [6]. In contrast, another study found no association between CRP, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels with post-COVID fatigue [7].
Physical exercise has been proven to be beneficial in increasing functional capacity, the capability to perform aerobic work as defined by the maximal oxygen uptake (); and is the sum of cardiac output and arteriovenous oxygen difference at physical exhaustion [8]. Previous studies reported that there was an effect of a supervised cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program on increasing functional capacity in post-COVID-19 patients [9, 10]. Physical exercises increase the immune response in various inflammatory conditions characterized by increased leukocyte mobilization and increased systemic inflammatory mediators produced by immune cells and directly from active muscle tissue [11]. Routine moderate-intensity exercise had a favorable effects in reducing most of the inflammatory mediators, including CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6, and conversely increasing the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines [4, 12] where the increase in functional capacity was inversely proportional to the levels of inflammatory mediators [13].
The contrasting results of the association between exercise and CRP levels suggested uncertainty of the effectiveness of exercise to reduce CRP levels independently [14]. The result of the previous meta-analyses showed that there was no significant improvement in CRP after physical exercise in children and adults [15, 16]. Previous studies investigating the relationship between exercise and NLR showed that higher NLR was associated with lower functional capacity but some did not reach statistical significance [17, 18]. Studies evaluating the effect of exercise on high sensitivity CRP (Hs-CRP) level and NLR in individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome are limited; therefore, studies assessing the relationship between functional capacity and inflammatory markers in post-COVID-19 syndrome are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the association between functional capacity with Hs-CRP and NLR in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. Moreover, this study is expected to disclose the evidence of prolonged inflammatory responses in post-COVID-19 syndrome and the benefit of exercise program to accelerate recovery in individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome.
Methods
Study design and setting
A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Integrated Cardiac Rehabilitation Center at Dr. Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. The study was conducted between May and October 2021. Clinical data, VO2max, Hs-CRP and leucocyte levels were measured prior and six weeks after completing supervised cardiopulmonary exercise program. All individuals were medical professionals who had confirmed COVID-19 from January 2020 to March 2021. The time of completing the exercise programs were different for each participant as they started at a different time.
Study participants
The participants of the study were healthcare workers aged between 20–58 years who had COVID-19 infection previously, both hospitalized and non-hospitalized with mild and moderate symptoms and had been declared recovered and were able to perform daily activities without any assistance. However, all of them still experiencing residual symptoms >12 weeks after the onset of infection. The COVID-19 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab. The classification of mild and moderate symptoms was based on the Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19 published by the National Health Commission of China [19]. The participants with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, heart disease (heart failure, coronary heart disease, heart valve disease, and uncontrolled rhythm abnormalities), kidney failure, malignancy, uncontrolled hypertension, post-stroke, and confirmed with COVID-19 more than once, were excluded. Additionally, those who could not complete all exercise programs were dropped from the study.
Study variables
Before the exercise program started, the age, sex, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure and heart rate, VO2max, Hs-CRP, leucocyte and other routine blood tests were measured on the same day. The VO2max of all participants representing functional capacity that was obtained from multiplying metabolic equivalent (MET) by 3.5 (1 MET is equal to 3.5 mL/kg/min); examined from stress test with WHO Bike protocol using Ergometer E-bike Basic device following the manufacturer’s guideline (Ergoline GmbH, Bitz, Germany). The Hs-CRP was measured using high sensitivity immunoturbidimetry (Abbott, Illinois, USA) and leucocyte levels were measured using flowcytometry method using semiconductor laser (Sysmex XN550, Sysmex Europe, Norderstedt, Germany), at Prodia Laboratory, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. NLR was calculated from the ratio between neutrophil and lymphocyte from the leucocyte counts. After six weeks of weeks of exercise program, the VO2max, Hs-CRP, and leukocyte level data were remeasured.
In addition, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and routine blood test parameters (hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red cell distribution width (RDW), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were also measured before and after the program.
Exercise program intervention
The supervised cardiopulmonary exercise was carried out for six weeks (12 times, twice a week) according to the participants’ basic VO2max measured at starting of the study and consisted of either moderate or high intensity exercise. If the participants could reach 3–5.9 METs, they received moderate intensity exercise, and if they could reach ≥6 METs, a high intensity exercise was provided. Moderate intensity was described as continuous aerobic type exercise with duration 30 min/day and prescribed as walking on a treadmill (G6485 Pioneer R2, BH Fitness, Pain Vasco, Spain) at a starting speed of 3 miles per hour (mph) with target 55–69% of maximum heart rate. While, high intensity was an interval high intensity aerobic type with the same duration and prescribed as jogging or running on a treadmill with a starting speed of 4.5 mph to reach the target 70–89% of maximum heart rate. The exercise prescription was based on American College of Sports Medicine definition of moderate and high intensity activities [20]. All the exercise programs were fully trained by certified personnel and monitored by a cardiologist at Cardiac Rehabilitation Gym Installation at Dr. Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean (standard deviation (SD); non-normal variables were reported as median (minimum-maximal). Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentage. Independent t-test or Mann Whitney were used to compare numeric data while Pearson χ2 or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categoric data between moderate and high intensity of supervised cardiopulmonary exercise. To assess the correlations between Hs-CRP and leukocyte levels with functional capacity, Pearson correlation test or Spearman’s rank correlation were used as appropriated based on the normality test using the Shapiro–Wilk test analysis. The correlation coefficients (r values) were classified as very low (0–<0.2), low (<0.4), moderate (<0.6), high (<0.8) and very high correlation (0.8–1). A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM SPSS, New York, United States).
Results
Individuals’ characteristics between moderate and high intensity exercise
A total of 30 individuals (19 moderate and 11 high exercise intensity) were included in this study, with an average age of 40.11 and 33.09 years for moderate and high exercise intensity, respectively (Table 1). The moderate exercise group was dominated by the female (78.9%), while the high exercise group was dominated by the male (81.8%). There was a significant difference in functional capacity between the moderate and high intensity groups after supervised cardiopulmonary exercise (p<0.001) (Table 1). However, the assessment based on inflammatory markers (Hs-CRP and NLR) between groups after exercise showed no significant difference (p>0.05).
Table 1. Characteristics of the individuals who received moderate and high intensity of exercise, both pre-exercise and post-exercise.
| Characteristics | Cardiopulmonary exercise intensity | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate (n=19) | High (n=11) | ||
| Age (year), mean ± SD | 40.11±8.89 | 33.09±6.37 | 0.030* |
| Sex, n (%) | 0.002* | ||
| Male | 4 (21.9) | 9 (81.8) | |
| Female | 15 (78.9) | 2 (18.2) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 27.58±4.62 | 25.26±3.24 | 0.156 |
| Pre-intervention | |||
| Systolic BP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 114.11±10.41 | 122.45±18.55 | 0.124 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg), median (min-max) | 80 (60-90) | 80 (60-103) | 0.805 |
| Heart rate (beats per minute), median (min-max) | 89 (72–120) | 88 (64–104) | 0.473 |
| VO2max (mL/kg/min), median (min-max) | 17.5 (12.2–30.8) | 26.25 (17.5–36.7) | 0.002* |
| Hs-CRP (mg/L), median (min-max) | 4.1 (2.3–10.3) | 4 (2.2–10.2) | 0.966 |
| Neutrophil-leucocyte ratio, mean ± SD | 1.93±0.47 | 1.74±0.54 | 0.336 |
| Post-intervention | |||
| Systolic BP (mmHg), mean ± SD | 113.84±10.74 | 125.64±17.58 | 0.030* |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg), median (min-max) | 70 (60–90) | 80 (60–90) | 0.160 |
| Heart rate (beats per minute), mean ± SD | 89.32±13.94 | 89.45±12.05 | 0.978 |
| VO2max (mL/kg/min), mean ± SD | 21.97±3.81 | 30.38±5.65 | <0.001** |
| Hs-CRP (mg/L), median (min-max) | 3.3 (2.3–18.8) | 3.8 (2.5–8.7) | 0.846 |
| Neutrophil-leucocyte ratio, median (min-max) | 1.99 (0.97–2.37) | 1.79 (1.1–2.4) | 0.533 |
BP: blood pressure; SD: standard deviation
Statistically significant at p=0.05
Statistically significant at p=0.001
Characteristics of blood test parameters moderate and high intensity exercise
The pre-exercise and post-exercise routine blood test results for both moderate and high intensity exercise group are presented in Table 2. On pre-exercise, hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, platelets, and leukocytes did not show any significant differences between the two groups. In contrast, hemoglobin content (MCH and MCHC) and cell variation (RDW) in red blood cells between groups had significant differences (all had p<0.05). The average neutrophil count had no different between moderate and high exercise groups (p=0.161) (Table 2).
Table 2. Comparation of routine blood test parameters between individuals who received moderate and high intensity, both pre-exercise and post-exercise.
| Phase | Parameter | Supervised cardiopulmonary exercise | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate (n = 19) | High (n = 11) | |||
| Pre-exercise | ||||
| Hemoglobin, mean ± SD | 13.27±1.85 | 14.4±1.35 | 0.089 | |
| Hematocrit, mean ± SD | 40±5.06 | 42.15±3.42 | 0.222 | |
| Erythrocyte, mean ± SD | 4.83±0.52 | 5±0.48 | 0.407 | |
| MCV, median (min-max) | 84.3 (68.6–91.4) | 85.4 (80.4–86.8) | 0.780 | |
| MCH, mean ± SD | 27.45±2.56 | 28.8±0.71 | 0.041* | |
| MCHC, mean ± SD | 33.14±1.03 | 34.14±0.74 | 0.009* | |
| RDW, median (min-max) | 13.2 (11.7–19.9) | 12.4 (11.6–13.3) | 0.037* | |
| Thrombocyte, mean ± SD | 299.42±48.43 | 277.36±48.58 | 0.240 | |
| Leucocyte, mean ± SD | 7.26±1.54 | 7.32±1.12 | 0.905 | |
| Basophile, mean ± SD | 0.45±0.24 | 0.43±0.22 | 0.812 | |
| Eosinophile, median (min-max) | 1.6 (0.6–7.2) | 2.8 (1.1–15.5) | 0.132 | |
| Neutrophil, mean ± SD | 58.86±5.78 | 55.07±8.65 | 0.161 | |
| Lymphocyte, mean ± SD | 31.56±4.84 | 33±5.78 | 0.469 | |
| Monocyte, median (min-max) | 6.2 (4.8–11) | 6.8 (5.3–11.7) | 0.426 | |
| ESR, median (min-max) | 18 (3–55) | 5 (2–28) | 0.029 | |
| Post-exercise | ||||
| Hemoglobin, mean ± SD | 13.2 (11.5–15.6) | 14.6 (11.5–15.6) | 0.031* | |
| Hematocrit, mean ± SD | 40.2 (31.1–47.3) | 42.8 (34.8–45.2) | 0.067 | |
| Erythrocyte, mean ± SD | 4.67 (4.15–5.73) | 5.2 (3.99–5.33) | 0.189 | |
| MCV, median (min-max) | 82.62±6.8 | 84.36±2.36 | 0.320 | |
| MCH, mean ± SD | 27.24±2.67 | 28.7±0.82 | 0.037* | |
| MCHC, mean ± SD | 32.94±1.07 | 34±0.93 | 0.011* | |
| RDW, median (min-max) | 13 (11.7–18.8) | 12.6 (11.5–13.5) | 0.131 | |
| Thrombocyte, mean ± SD | 304 (266–409) | 261 (239–350) | 0.282 | |
| Leucocyte, mean ± SD | 6.87±1.65 | 7.68±7.5 | 0.226 | |
| Basophile, mean ± SD | 0.5±0.21 | 0.44±0.26 | 0.509 | |
| Eosinophile, median (min-max) | 2.52±1.51 | 3.41±1.67 | 0.144 | |
| Neutrophil, mean ± SD | 60 (44.7–64.7) | 56.8 (45.7–64.4) | 0.312 | |
| Lymphocyte, mean ± SD | 30 (26.4–45.9) | 32.2 (26–41.6) | 0.576 | |
| Monocyte, median (min-max) | 6.81±1.14 | 6.9±0.88 | 0.818 | |
| ESR, median (min-max) | 13 (3–50) | 9 (3–20) | 0.110 | |
Statistically significant at p<0.05
Post-exercise routine blood test data showed higher hemoglobin levels in the high intensity group than in the moderate group, with a difference of 1.4 gr/dL (p=0.031) (Table 2). A similar difference was shown for hemoglobin content in cells (MCH and MCHC) between the two groups (both p<0.05). Although, the mean neutrophil count in the moderate exercise group was relatively higher compared to the high intensity group (a difference of 3.2%), this had no significant difference (p=0.312) (Table 2).
Correlation between high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) and functional capacity
There was no significant correlation between Hs-CRP and functional capacity of those who received moderate intensity with p=0.276 (Table 3). Our data also indicated no significant correlation between Hs-CRP and functional capacity in high intensity group (Table 3).
Table 3. Correlation between sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) and functional capacity in individuals after moderate and high intensity exercise.
| Intensity | Variable | Median | Min - Max | r | p-value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate | -0.263 | 0.276 | |||
| VO2max | 21.0 | 15.7–28.0 | |||
| Hs-CRP | 3.3 | 2.3–18.8 | |||
| High | 0.164 | 0.629 | |||
| VO2max | 29.7 | 19.25–38.5 | |||
| Hs-CRP | 3.8 | 2.5–8.7 |
Analyzed using Spearman’s correlation test
Correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and functional capacity
Our data indicated that NLR was negatively correlated with functional capacity among individuals who received moderate exercise with moderate correlation (r=-0.545) (Table 4). However, there was no correlation between NLR and functional capacity among individuals who received high intensity exercise (Table 4).
Table 4. Correlation between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and functional capacity in individuals after moderate and high intensity exercise.
| Intensity | Variable | Median | Min - Max | r | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate | -0.545 | 0.016 a,* | |||
| VO2max | 21.0 | 15.7–28.0 | |||
| NLR | 1.9 | 0.97–2.3 | |||
| High, mean±SD | |||||
| VO2max | 30.38±5.65 | - | -0.143 | 0.676 b | |
| NLR | 1.78±0.38 | - |
Analyzed using Spearman’s correlation test
Analyzed using Pearson correlation test
Statistically significant at p<0.05
Discussion
NICE defines post-COVID-19 syndrome as symptoms persisting for >12 weeks [2] and it is estimated that the prevalence ranges from 3% to 11.7%, with a substantial impact on decreased quality of life, both social and professional, as well as disruption of daily activities [21]. The functional capacity assessment describes the ability to carry out daily activities that require aerobic metabolism. Combined activities involving the respiratory, cardiovascular, and skeletal muscle systems can determine one individual’s functional capacity [8] and it is usually assessed using a treadmill machine or bicycle ergometer [22, 23].
From our study we found that the average Hs-CRP level were above normal value both on moderate and high intensity exercise groups before exercise program (4.1 and 4 mg/L). This was also reported in a previous study which found CRP levels that remained high in 120 patients three months after recovering from COVID-19 infection [25]. Hs-CRP levels were normal if <0.3 mg/dL and elevated Hs-CRP usually occurs in conditions of systemic inflammation [26].
Our data suggested that there was no significant correlation between Hs-CRP and functional capacity after having moderate and high intensity supervised cardiopulmonary training in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. This finding aligned with a previous meta-analysis, which found that exercise intensity did not reduce chronic inflammation levels [27]. The duration of exercise that the sample in this study participated in was six weeks, and Hs-CRP levels decreased but did not reach normal values. A previous study reported that the Hs-CRP level decreased below 0.3 mg/dL at 12 weeks after moderate exercise in 29 women with a mean age of 74.2 years [26].
This study found that the NLR values of moderate and high intensity groups before exercise were 1.93 and 1.74, respectively. NLR normality value as previously proposed (0.78–3.58) [28]. The average NLR value in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome after moderate intensity supervised cardiopulmonary exercise was 1.83, and the average functional capacity was 21. The NLR value was negatively correlated with functional capacity with moderate correlation. A significant correlation between NLR and VO2max was not found in subjects who underwent high-intensity supervised cardiopulmonary exercise.
The exercise intensity strongly affected the value of NLR and functional capacity [29, 30]. A previous study reported that moderate intensity aerobic exercise for two weeks increased the number of leucocytes count in COVID-19 patients with mild and moderate symptoms [31]. The reason is that aerobic exercise accelerates the recruitment of natural killers, T cells and B cells in the bloodstream. Natural killers proliferate more compared to T cells, leading to a decrease in the CD3+ T cells percentage and this facilitates the recruitment process of leucocyte and as the result increasing the number of leukocytes [32]. Another study reported that NLR value was within normal range but slightly higher at 30 min after high intensity exercise compared to pre-exercise in healthy volunteers [33]. Elevated cortisol levels on high intensity exercise was thought to be responsible on promoting a pro-neutrophil and anti-lymphocyte condition, inhibit mitogenesis, accelerate lymphocyte apoptosis resulting in lower lymphocyte count, as well as increasing the release of neutrophils to the bloodstream, leads to higher count of these cells at the end of exercise [11,33]. To the best of our knowledge, there was no study involving high intensity exercise on post COVID-19 patients.
The study had some limitations that must be taken into account. Firstly, it was performed on patients from a single health care center and the results may not be generalized to other populations or geographical areas. Furthermore, this study recruited a relatively small number of samples. A longer period of exercise program is potential to see the effect of duration on further reduction of inflammatory markers.
Conclusion
A negative correlation was observed between NLR and functional capacity in individuals with post-COVID-19 syndrome after undergoing moderate intensity supervised cardiopulmonary exercise. Although the average Hs-CRP level decreased after supervised cardiopulmonary exercise in both moderate and high intensity, the correlations between Hs-CRP and functional capacity in both groups were not significant.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the volunteers who participated in this study and the staff at Cardiac Rehabilitation Gym Installation of Dr. Zainoel Abidin, Banda Aceh, Indonesia for enrolling the study participants and monitoring the exercise program. We also appreciate Prodia Laboratory staff for handling the blood specimens.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee, Dr Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Banda Aceh, Indonesia (ref no 200/EA/FK-RSUDZA/2021).
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
The cost for the exercise program was funded by Dr. Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh collaborated with the Research and Community Service Institute of Universitas Syiah Kuala. The funding source was not involved in the design or conduct of the study or during in preparation of the manuscript, and the analyses and opinions expressed are those of the authors alone.
Underlying data
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
How to cite
Widasari N, Heriansyah T, Ridwan M, et al. Correlation between high sensitivity C reactive protein (Hs-CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with functional capacity in post COVID-19 syndrome patients. Narra J 2023; 3(2): e183 - http://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v3i2.183.
References
- 1.Larsen NW, Stiles LE, Miglis MG. Preparing for the long-haul: Autonomic complications of COVID-19. Auton Neurosci 2021;235:102841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shah W, Hillman T, Playford E.D, et al. Managing the long term effects of covid-19: Summary of NICE, SIGN, and RCGP rapid guideline. BMJ 2021;372:136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Long QX, Tang XJ, Shi QL, et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat Med 2020;26:1200–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Córdova-martínez A, Pérez-valdecantos D, Caballero-garcía A, et al. Effect of exercise in the recovery process after the inflammation process caused by coronavirus. J Hum Sport Exerc 2021;18:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maamar M, Artime A, Pariente E, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome, low-grade inflammation and inflammatory markers: a cross-sectional study. Curr Med Res Opin 2022;38:901–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang I, Pranata R, Lim MA, et al. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and ferritin in severe coronavirus disease-2019: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2020;14:1753466620937175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Townsend L, Dyer AH, Jones K, et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0240784–e0240784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arena R, Myers J, Williams MA, et al. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings. Circulation 2007;116:329–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ahmed I. COVID-19 - does exercise prescription and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) have a role in risk-stratifying patients? Clin Med 2020;20:282–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Acar RD, Saribaş E, Güney PA, et al. COVID-19: The new cause of dyspnoea as a result of reduced lung and peripheral muscle performance. J Breath Research 2021;15:47103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cerqueira É, Marinho DA, Neiva HP, et al. Inflammatory effects of high and moderate intensity exercise—a systematic review. Front Physiol 2020;10: 1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zheng G, Qiu P, Xia R, et al. Effect of aerobic exercise on inflammatory markers in healthy middle-aged and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Aging Neurosci 2019;11:98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Balducci S, Zanuso S, Nicolucci A, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of exercise training in subjects with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome is dependent on exercise modalities and independent of weight loss. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2010;20:608–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Michigan A, Johnson T V., Master VA. Review of the relationship between C-reactive protein and exercise. Mol Diagn Ther 2011;15:265–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Effects of aerobic exercise on C-reactive protein, body composition, and maximum oxygen consumption in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Metabolism 2006;55:1500–1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.García-Hermoso A, Sánchez-López M, Escalante Y, et al. Exercise-based interventions and C-reactive protein in overweight and obese youths: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pediatric Research 2016;79:522–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yildiz A, Yuksel M, Oylumlu M, et al. The association between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and functional capacity in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2015;15:13–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Drugescu A, Roca M, Zota IM, et al. Value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in predicting CPET Performance in patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI. Medicina 2022;58:814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu Y, Chen Y, Tang X.. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Glob Health Med 2020;2:66–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.American College of Sports Medicine. Guideline for exercise testing. 2006;:21. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ayoubkhani D, Gaughan C.. Technical article: Updated estimates of the prevalence of post-acute symptoms among people with coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK.
- 22.Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104:1694–1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lear SA, Brozic A, Myers JN, et al. Exercise Stress Testing. Sports Med 1999;27:285–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Santisteban KJ, Lovering AT, Halliwill JR, et al. Sex differences in VO2max and the impact on endurance-exercise performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:4946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gameil MA, Marzouk RE, Elsebaie AH, et al. Long-term clinical and biochemical residue after COVID-19 recovery. Egypt Liver J 2021;11:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nehring SM, Goyal A, Patel BC. C Reactive protein. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island: (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rose GL, Skinner TL, Mielke GI, et al. The effect of exercise intensity on chronic inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport is J Sci Med Sport 2021;24:345–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Forget P, Khalifa C, Defour J-P, et al. What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio? BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kaniganti US, DrC Karigar, Chatterjee P.. NLR: An incipient marker to monitor inflammation, overtraining, and recovery in athletes. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health 2022;9:138–141. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Villelabeitia Jaureguizar K, Vicente-Campos D, Ruiz Bautista L, et al. Effect of high-intensity interval versus continuous exercise training on functional capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized clinical trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2016;36:96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mohamed AA, Alawna M.. The effect of aerobic exercise on immune biomarkers and symptoms severity and progression in patients with COVID-19: A randomized control trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2021;28:425–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Natale VM, Brenner IK, Moldoveanu AI, et al. Effects of three different types of exercise on blood leukocyte count during and following exercise. Sao Paulo Med J 2003;121:09–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gomes JH, Mendes RR, Franca CS, et al. Acute leucocyte, muscle damage, and stress marker responses to high-intensity functional training. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0243276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
