Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2023 Dec 11;12(3):1965–1972. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3892

Dietary diversity practice and its associated factors among pregnant women in Eastern Ethiopia: A community‐based cross‐sectional study

Habtamu Geremew 1,, Samuel Abdisa 2, Ebisa Zerihun 3, Yitagesu Kifelew Gizaw 4, Yoseph Kassa 4, Chalachew Gashu 4, Mulat Belay Simegn 5
PMCID: PMC10916598  PMID: 38455219

Abstract

Micronutrient insufficiencies during pregnancy have a marked impact on the health of the woman and her offspring. Evidence about the dietary practice of pregnant women is limited in Ethiopia, particularly in drought‐prone areas where food insecurity is widely seen. Therefore, this research aimed to assess the dietary diversity practice and associated factors among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia. We employed a community‐based cross‐sectional survey in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia. The data were collected from 417 randomly selected pregnant women using an interview‐administered structured questionnaire. EpiData‐3.1 and STATA‐14 were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. The binary logistic regression analysis was deployed to assess the association between dietary diversity practice and predictor variables. Out of 420 calculated sample size, 417 pregnant women completed the survey giving a response rate of 99.3%. The overall prevalence of optimal dietary diversity was 38.4% (95% CI: 33.7%, 43.2%). Educational status (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.08, 6.81), meal frequency (AOR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.28), home gardening (AOR: 4.21, 95% CI: 2.48, 7.16), and household food security (AOR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.40) were independent predictors of dietary diversity practice.This study found that a substantial proportion of pregnant women had suboptimal dietary diversity, indicating a fundamental micronutrient inadequacy. Educational status, meal frequency, home gardening practice, and household food security were independent determinants of dietary diversity practice. The findings suggest that promoting maternal education and home gardening practice, and controlling food insecurity might enhance optimal dietary diversity.

Keywords: dietary diversity, Eastern Ethiopia, pregnant women


This community‐based cross‐sectional study investigated the dietary diversity practice of pregnant women. Accordingly, the majority of women had poor dietary diversity. Hence calling for comprehensive intervention to prevent micronutrient deficiency among these special population.

graphic file with name FSN3-12-1965-g001.jpg

1. BACKGROUND

Dietary diversity is the measure of the range of meals eaten across and within food groups over a referenced period (FAO: Minimum dietary diversity for women: A guide for measurement, 2016). It is a qualitative index of dietary intake that can be used for evaluating the sufficiency of micronutrients (FAO: Minimum dietary diversity for women: A guide for measurement, 2016; Zhong et al., 2022). Intake of a diversified diet is crucial to satisfy the micronutrient requirement of pregnant women and promotes the physiologic development of the fetus (Tilahun & Kebede, 2021; Yang et al., 2021).

Although pregnant women have extra nutritional demand, poor dietary diversity practice among these vulnerable segments of the population is still a common problem worldwide; especially, in low and middle‐income countries (Hailu & Woldemichael, 2019; Lander et al., 2019). For instance, a community‐based study in Nepal found that about half of pregnant women did not consume a diverse diet (Shrestha et al., 2021). Another report from Ghana found that two out of every ten pregnant women were not consuming a diversified diet (Saaka et al., 2021). In Ethiopia, previous studies among pregnant women reported poor dietary diversity practices ranging from 38.8% to 87.2%, indicating a substantial variation across communities (Jemal & Awol, 2019; Workicho et al., 2019).

Micronutrient insufficiencies during pregnancy have a marked effect on the health of both the woman and her offspring (Yang et al., 2021, 2022). Low dietary diversity during pregnancy can result in hemorrhage, anemia, preterm birth, infection, and death in mothers (Zerfu et al., 2016). The fetus also suffers from various sequelae including stillbirth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies, and developmental delays (Abu‐Saad & Fraser, 2010; Saaka, 2012).

Dietary diversity practice is predicted by various factors. Existing evidence shows that dietary diversity practice has a significant association with educational status, family size, residence, household wealth index, household food security, antenatal care (ANC), home gardening, and meal frequency (Diddana, 2019; Hailu & Woldemichael, 2019; Saaka et al., 2021). Though, their level of importance differs across studies.

The National Nutrition Program is one of the strategies being implemented to overcome nutritional problems in Ethiopia, yet the problem continues to be substantial (Azene et al., 2021). Evidence about pregnant women's dietary diversity pattern is important to verify the extent and distribution of the phenomenon, to make informed decisions, and for efficient channeling of resources; however, such data are limited in Ethiopia, particularly in drought‐prone areas where food insecurity is widely seen. Therefore, this research aimed to assess dietary diversity practice and its associated factors among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia.

2. METHODS AND MATERIALS

2.1. Study design and setting

A community‐based cross‐sectional survey was carried out in Chiro district, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. The district is located 326 km east of the national capital, Addis Ababa. There are 42 (three urban and 39 rural) kebeles in the district with an estimated total population of 314,056 people, of which 10,898 are pregnant women (Geremew et al., 2023). The health service within the district is facilitated by 42 health posts, eight health centers, and one General Hospital, which are providing health‐promotive, disease‐preventive, curative, and rehabilitative health services including nutritional support. The study was conducted from November 1 to 30, 2022.

2.2. Population

All pregnant women in Chiro district was our source population. Whereas, all pregnant women in the randomly selected kebels of Chiro district constitute our study population.

2.3. Eligibility criteria

All pregnant women who are living in Chiro district for at least 6 months were eligible to be included in this study. Nevertheless, pregnant women who were seriously ill and/or have difficulties to communicate were excluded from this survey.

2.4. Sample size and sampling procedures

The single population proportion formula was used to calculate the required sample size by considering 45% dietary diversity practice from a community‐based study in East Gojjam Zone (Yeneabat et al., 2019), 95% confidence interval, and a 5% margin of error. As a result, the estimated sample size was 381. An anticipated 10% non‐response rate was added giving us a final sample size of 420 pregnant women.

Systematic random sampling technique was employed to select study participants from eight randomly selected kebeles, by using the pregnancy screening registration book of health posts as a sampling frame. Besides, the sample size was distributed to each selected kebeles proportionally (proportional to the number of pregnant women in each kebeles).

2.5. Data collection and quality assurance

An interview‐administered structured questionnaire that was adapted by reviewing different literatures was utilized to gather the data (Boke & Geremew, 2018; Tilahun & Kebede, 2021; Yeneabat et al., 2019). The tool was first prepared in English, and then translated to Oromiffa and back to English by two different language experts to ensure its consistency. Eight clinical nurses who are working in primary health care facilities, and have extensive experience in human nutrition were recruited as data collectors and they were supervised by four B.Sc. nurses.

To ensure the quality of the collected data, data collectors and supervisors were trained for 2 days about the study, and how to approach and interview pregnant women. The questionnaire was also pretested on 30 pregnant women in one of the kebeles not included in this survey. Furthermore, the quality and completeness of the collected data were reviewed daily by investigators.

2.6. Operational definition and study variables

2.6.1. Dependent variable

Dietary diversity was our dependent variable. Pregnant women who had consumed five or more out of the 10 food groups in the past 24 h were considered to practice optimal dietary diversity (FAO: Minimum dietary diversity for women: A guide for measurement, 2016).

2.6.2. Independent variables

The independent variable considered in this study includes socio‐demographic variables, housing and environmental variables, and reproductive and behavioral variables. Besides, household food security was assessed using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). The tool is composed of nine items specific to an experience of food insecurity occurring within the previous 4 weeks; accordingly, a household was categorized as food‐secure if it does not experience any of the food insecurity conditions or just experienced worry, but rarely (Coates et al., 2007).

2.7. Data processing and analysis

The data were entered into the computer system using EpiData‐3.1, and then it was exported to STATA‐14 statistical software for further statistical analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed and presented in tables and figures. Binary logistic regression was fitted to identify predictors of dietary diversity practice. The bi‐variable logistic regression model was built to select candidate variables for the multivariable analysis. Then independent variables with p‐value less than .25 were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model, after assessing for multi‐collinearity. p‐values less than .05 was used to declare a statistically significant association. Besides, the best model was selected using the likelihood ratio test, and the fitness of the final model was checked using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit test.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Socio‐demographic characteristics

Out of 420 randomly selected pregnant women, 417 women completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 99.3%. The mean age of the respondents was 26.86 (SD ± 6.12) years. The majority (84.4%) of pregnant women were rural dwellers and most (66.2%) of the study participants were housewives (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia, 2022.

Variables Category Frequency Percentage
Age group 15–24 years 169 40.5
25–34 years 186 44.6
35–45 years 62 14.9
Residence Urban 65 15.6
Rural 352 84.4
Marital status Married 404 96.9
Divorced 10 2.4
Widowed 3 0.7
Educational status No formal education 175 42.0
Primary 208 49.9
Secondary and above 34 8.1
Occupation Housewife 276 66.2
Farmer 110 26.4
Merchant 15 3.6
Government employee 13 3.1
Daily laborer 3 0.7
Family size ≤4 210 50.4
>4 207 49.6
Income category Highest 85 20.4
Mild 92 22.1
Moderate 87 20.8
Lowest 153 36.7
Time to reach the market ≤30 min 162 38.8
30–60 min 170 40.8
>60 min 85 20.4

3.2. Housing and environmental characteristics of study participants

The majority of pregnant women were from households that own latrines (82.0%), large livestock (59.5%), small livestock (68.6%), and produce crops (81.3%). The food source of more than half (53.7%) of women was their own production (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Distribution of housing and environmental characteristics among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia, 2022.

Variable Categories Frequency Percentage
Home gardening Yes 180 43.2
No 237 56.8
Production of crops Yes 339 81.3
No 78 18.7
Having large live‐stocks Yes 248 59.5
No 169 40.5
Having small live‐stock Yes 286 68.6
No 131 31.4
Does the household own latrine Yes 342 82.0
No 75 18.0
Source of drinking water Pipe 144 34.5
Spring 226 54.2
River 47 11.3
Food source Own production 224 53.7
Purchased 80 19.2
Both 113 27.1
Household food security Food secure 256 61.4
Not food secure 161 38.6

3.3. Reproductive and behavioral characteristics of respondents

Most (91.4%) of pregnant women were not in a polygamous relationship. About three out of 10 pregnancies were not planned. Most (52.5%) of the women were in their second trimester, and about one‐third of women receive support from their partner on household activities (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Distribution of reproductive and behavioral characteristics among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia, 2022.

Variable Categories Frequency Percentage
Polygamy Yes 36 8.6
No 381 91.4
Gravidity ≤2 139 33.3
3–4 144 34.5
≥5 134 32.2
ANC follow‐up Yes 305 73.1
No 112 26.9
Nutrition information Yes 301 72.2
No 116 27.8
Is this pregnancy planned Yes 291 69.8
No 126 30.2
Stage of pregnancy First trimester 61 14.6
Second trimester 219 52.5
Third trimester 137 32.9
Illness within 2 weeks Yes 101 24.2
No 316 75.8
Food taboo Yes 30 7.2
No 387 92.8
Meal frequency <4 282 67.6
≥4 135 32.4
Fasting during pregnancy Yes 269 64.5
No 148 35.5
Khat chewing Yes 267 64.0
No 150 36.0
Partner support on indoor activities Yes 139 33.3
No 278 66.7

3.4. Prevalence of dietary diversity practice

Out of 417 respondents interviewed, 160 consumed a diversified diet in the past 24 h, indicating an optimal dietary diversity prevalence of 38.4% (95% CI: 33.7%, 43.2%) (Figure 1). The most commonly consumed food groups were starchy staples (100%), followed by pulses (76.3%) and other vegetables (42.5%) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Dietary diversity practice of pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Food groups consumed in the past 24 h among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia.

3.5. Determinants of dietary diversity practice

According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, educational status, meal frequency, household food security status, and home gardening practice were significant determinants of dietary diversity practice.

Correspondingly, pregnant women who had attended secondary or higher education were 2.71 (95% CI: 1.08, 6.81) times more likely to consume an optimally diverse diet than women who attended only primary education. Similarly, pregnant women who had four or more meals in a day were 1.91 (95% CI: 1.11, 3.28) times more likely to consume a diversified diet than women who had less than four meals in a day. The odds of optimal dietary diversity were 4.21 (95% CI: 2.48, 7.16) times more common among women who are from households that practice home gardening as compared to their counterparts. Pregnant women who are from food‐insecure households were 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.40) times less likely to practice optimal dietary diversity than women from food‐secure households (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Factors associated with dietary diversity practice of pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia, 2022.

Variable Categories Dietary diversity COR AOR (95% CI)
Optimal Sub‐optimal
Occupation Housewife 101 (36.6) 175 (63.4) 1 1
Farmer 42 (38.2) 68 (61.8) 1.07 0.66 (0.38, 1.17)
Others 17 (54.8) 14 (45.2) 2.10 1.09 (0.42, 2.79)
Family size ≤4 91 (43.3) 119 (56.7) 1 1
>4 69 (33.3) 138 (66.7) 0.65 0.74 (0.45, 1.23)
Educational status No formal education 55 (31.4) 120 (68.6) 0.72 1.12 (0.66, 1.90)
Primary 81 (38.9) 127 (61.1) 1 1
Secondary & above 24 (70.6) 10 (29.4) 3.76 2.71 (1.08, 6.81)*
Illness in the past 2 weeks Yes 27 (26.7) 74 (73.3) 0.50 0.76 (0.42, 1.37)
No 133 (42.1) 183 (57.9) 1 1
Nutrition information Yes 137 (45.5) 164 (54.5) 1 1
No 23 (19.8) 93 (80.2) 0.30 0.61 (0.33, 1.14)
Meal frequency <4 78 (27.7) 204 (72.3) 1 1
≥4 82 (60.74) 53 (39.3) 4.05 1.91 (1.11, 3.28)*
Kchat chewing Yes 86 (32.2) 181 (67.8) 1 1
No 74 (49.3) 76 (50.7) 2.05 1.29 (0.78, 2.15)
Home gardening Yes 95 (52.8) 85 (47.2) 2.96 4.21 (2.48, 7.16)*
No 65 (27.4) 172 (72.6) 1 1
Food security Food secure 132 (51.6) 124 (48.4) 1 1
Not food secure 28 (17.4) 133 (82.6) 0.20 0.23 (0.13, 0.40)*

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; COR, crude odds ratio.

*

Significant at p < .05.

4. DISCUSSION

In this cross‐sectional analysis, we investigated the dietary diversity practice of pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia. The results showed that 38.4% of pregnant women in the study area had optimal dietary diversity practices, which is in line with a community‐based study in southern Ethiopia, where the magnitude of optimal dietary diversity was 42.1% (Gudeta et al., 2022). However, our finding was higher than another report from Gurage Zone, southern Ethiopia (Geta et al., 2022). The plausible explanation for this variation might due to the difference in methodology, which the study conducted in the Gurage zone was based on repeated measurements during different gestational ages of pregnancy.

On the other hand, our finding was lower than reports of previous studies conducted in Harar town, Eastern Ethiopia, 52.7% (Kassahun et al., 2023); Jeldu District, Central Ethiopia, 81.9% (Merga et al., 2022); Bale zone southeast Ethiopia, 45.8% (Hailu & Woldemichael, 2019); and Kaffa Zone, southwest Ethiopia, 51% (Tilahun & Kebede, 2021). This discrepancy might be due to the differences in study setting and study period across the researches. The present study was conducted in Chiro district, known for high and rapidly shifting production of khat (Tofu & Wolka, 2023). This may cause poor access and availability of different food groups like fruits and vegetables in the area, thus leading to minimal dietary diversity.

In the present study, pregnant women who had secondary or higher education had a higher chance of optimal dietary diversity as compared to women with primary or lower education. This finding is congruent with previous reports from Ethiopia (Geta et al., 2022), and Kenya (Kiboi et al., 2017), and could be due to the greater probability of acquiring important information about proper feeding among women with higher educational levels. Hence, acknowledging the comprehensive role of education on health.

In line with previous studies (Jemal & Awol, 2019; Yeneabat et al., 2019), pregnant women who feed four or more times had a higher chance of eating a diversified diet than women who feed less than four times in a day. This might be due to the higher chance of consuming different food groups with increasing meal frequencies. Similarly, the likelihood of optimal dietary diversity was higher among pregnant women who are from households with home gardening as compared to their counterparts. This might be due to the expanded availability of different food groups among women from home gardening households (Blakstad et al., 2021).

This study found that pregnant women from food‐secure households had higher odds of optimal dietary diversity than women from food‐insecure households. The finding is compatible with prior evidence from Ethiopia (Geta et al., 2022; Jemal & Awol, 2019), and Bangladesh (Na et al., 2016). The possible explanation could be due to the lack of access to enough food among food‐insecure households thus compromising diversity (quality) over quantity.

This study has certain limitations. First, the cross‐sectional study design hinders any causal inferences between dietary diversity and its correlates. Second, the effect of seasonal variation on dietary diversity practice is not considered in this analysis. Finally, relying on women's memorization of food groups consumed might introduce recall bias.

5. CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the majority of pregnant women in the study area had suboptimal dietary diversity, indicating a fundamental micronutrient inadequacy. Educational status, meal frequency, home gardening practice, and household food security were independent determinants of dietary diversity practice. The findings suggest that promoting maternal education and home gardening practice, and controlling food insecurity might enhance optimal dietary diversity.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Habtamu Geremew: Conceptualization (lead); data curation (lead); formal analysis (lead); funding acquisition (lead); investigation (lead); methodology (lead); project administration (lead); resources (equal); software (lead); supervision (lead); validation (lead); visualization (lead); writing – original draft (lead); writing – review and editing (lead). Samuel Abdisa: Data curation (equal); funding acquisition (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); resources (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Ebisa Zerihun: Investigation (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Yitagesu Kifelew Gizaw: Data curation (supporting); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Yoseph Kassa: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); validation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Chalachew Gashu: Investigation (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); supervision (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Mulat Belay Simegn: Formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); validation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal).

FUNDING INFORMATION

This research was funded by Oda Bultum University. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, or preparation of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no competing interests in this work.

ETHICS STATEMENT

This study was approved by Oda Bultum University ethical review committee. The Declaration of Helsinki principles were strictly followed during the conduct of this study. due to the non‐invasive nature of the data collection process, oral informed consent was obtained from all pregnant women who participated in this study. Besides, the confidentiality of the collected information was assured by not recording women's identifiers.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Oda Bultum University for funding this study. We also thank the study participants, data collectors, and supervisors.

Geremew, H. , Abdisa, S. , Zerihun, E. , Gizaw, Y. K. , Kassa, Y. , Gashu, C. , & Simegn, M. B. (2024). Dietary diversity practice and its associated factors among pregnant women in Eastern Ethiopia: A community‐based cross‐sectional study. Food Science & Nutrition, 12, 1965–1972. 10.1002/fsn3.3892

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets used in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  1. Abu‐Saad, K. , & Fraser, D. (2010). Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes. Epidemiologic Reviews, 32(1), 5–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azene, A. G. , Aragaw, A. M. , Wubetie, H. T. , Wassie, G. T. , Tsegaye, G. W. , Derebe, M. A. , & Mitiku, H. D. (2021). Dietary diversity among pregnant women and associated factors in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One, 16(6), e0251906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blakstad, M. M. , Mosha, D. , Bellows, A. L. , Canavan, C. R. , Chen, J. T. , Mlalama, K. , Noor, R. A. , Kinabo, J. , Masanja, H. , & Fawzi, W. W. (2021). Home gardening improves dietary diversity, a cluster‐randomized controlled trial among Tanzanian women. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 17(2), e13096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boke, M. M. , & Geremew, A. B. (2018). Low dietary diversity and associated factors among lactating mothers in Angecha districts, Southern Ethiopia: Community based cross‐sectional study. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coates, J. , Swindale, A. , & Bilinsky, P. (2007). Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of household food access: Indicator guide (v. 3). Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development . (pp. 1–36).
  6. Diddana, T. Z. (2019). Factors associated with dietary practice and nutritional status of pregnant women in Dessie town, Northeastern Ethiopia: A community‐based cross‐sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FAO . (2016). FAO: Minimum dietary diversity for women: A guide for measurement (p. 82). FAO. [Google Scholar]
  8. Geremew, H. , Kebede, F. A. , Negash, A. , Mengstie, M. A. , & Geremew, D. (2023). Khat chewing and its associated factors among pregnant women in Chiro district, Eastern Ethiopia: A community‐based study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1253128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geta, T. G. , Gebremedhin, S. , & Omigbodun, A. O. (2022). Dietary diversity among pregnant women in Gurage zone, South Central Ethiopia: Assessment based on longitudinal repeated measurement. International Journal of Women's Health, 14, 599–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gudeta, T. G. , Terefe, A. B. , Mengistu, G. T. , & Sori, S. A. (2022). Determinants of dietary diversity practice among pregnant women in the Gurage zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2021: Community‐based cross‐sectional study. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2022, 8086793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hailu, S. , & Woldemichael, B. (2019). Dietary diversity and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at public health facilities in bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia. Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jemal, K. , & Awol, M. (2019). Minimum dietary diversity score and associated factors among pregnant women at Alamata general hospital, Raya Azebo zone, Tigray region, Ethiopia. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2019, 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kassahun, E. , Mesfin, F. , Ali, T. K. , & Getacher, L. (2023). Level and predictors of minimum dietary diversity among pregnant women in Eastern Ethiopia: Evidence from facility‐based cross‐sectional survey. Inquiry: A Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 60, p.00469580231167997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kiboi, W. , Kimiywe, J. , & Chege, P. (2017). Determinants of dietary diversity among pregnant women in Laikipia County, Kenya: A cross‐sectional study. BMC Nutrition, 3(1), 12. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lander, R. L. , Hambidge, K. M. , Westcott, J. E. , Tejeda, G. , Diba, T. S. , Mastiholi, S. C. , Khan, U. S. , Garcés, A. , Figueroa, L. , Tshefu, A. , Lokangaka, A. , Goudar, S. S. , Somannavar, M. S. , Ali, S. A. , Saleem, S. , McClure, E. M. , Krebs, N. F. , & The Women First Preconception Nutrition Trial Group . (2019). Pregnant women in four low‐middle income countries have a high prevalence of inadequate dietary intakes that are improved by dietary diversity. Nutrients, 11(7), 1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merga, G. , Mideksa, S. , Dida, N. , & Kennedy, G. (2022). Dietary diversity and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Jeldu District, West Shoa Zone, Oromia Ethiopia. PLoS One, 17(12), e0279223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Na, M. , Mehra, S. , Christian, P. , Ali, H. , Shaikh, S. , Shamim, A. A. , Labrique, A. B. , Klemm, R. D. , Wu, L. S. , & West, K. P., Jr. (2016). Maternal dietary diversity decreases with household food insecurity in rural Bangladesh: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Nutrition, 146(10), 2109–2116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Saaka, M. (2012). Maternal dietary diversity and infant outcome of pregnant women in Northern Ghana. Int J Child Health Nutr, 1(2), 148–156. [Google Scholar]
  19. Saaka, M. , Mutaru, S. , & Osman, S. M. (2021). Determinants of dietary diversity and its relationship with the nutritional status of pregnant women. Journal of Nutritional Science, 10, e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shrestha, V. , Paudel, R. , Sunuwar, D. R. , Lyman, A. L. T. , Manohar, S. , & Amatya, A. (2021). Factors associated with dietary diversity among pregnant women in the western hill region of Nepal: A community based cross‐sectional study. PLoS One, 16(4), e0247085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tilahun, A. G. , & Kebede, A. M. (2021). Maternal minimum dietary diversity and associated factors among pregnant women, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Nutrition, 7(1), 66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tofu, D. A. , & Wolka, K. (2023). Climate change induced a progressive shift of livelihood from cereal towards Khat (Chata edulis) production in Eastern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(1), e12790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Workicho, A. , Belachew, T. , Ghosh, S. , Kershaw, M. , Lachat, C. , & Kolsteren, P. (2019). Burden and determinants of undernutrition among young pregnant women in Ethiopia. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15(3), e12751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, J. , Cheng, Y. , Zeng, L. , Dang, S. , & Yan, H. (2021). Maternal dietary diversity during pregnancy and congenital heart defects: A case‐control study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 75(2), 355–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, J. , Wang, M. , Tobias, D. K. , Rich‐Edwards, J. W. , Darling, A. M. , Abioye, A. I. , Noor, R. A. , Madzorera, I. , & Fawzi, W. W. (2022). Dietary diversity and diet quality with gestational weight gain and adverse birth outcomes, results from a prospective pregnancy cohort study in urban Tanzania. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 18(2), e13300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yeneabat, T. , Adugna, H. , Asmamaw, T. , Wubetu, M. , Admas, M. , Hailu, G. , Bedaso, A. , & Amare, T. (2019). Maternal dietary diversity and micronutrient adequacy during pregnancy and related factors in East Gojjam zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zerfu, T. A. , Umeta, M. , & Baye, K. (2016). Dietary diversity during pregnancy is associated with reduced risk of maternal anemia, preterm delivery, and low birth weight in a prospective cohort study in rural Ethiopia. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103(6), 1482–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhong, W. , Zhao, A. , Lan, H. , Mao, S. , Li, P. , Jiang, H. , Wang, P. , Szeto, I. M.‐Y. , & Zhang, Y. (2022). Dietary diversity, micronutrient adequacy and bone status during pregnancy: A study in urban China from 2019 to 2020. Nutrients, 14(21), 4690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used in this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES