Abstract
Bone is created by osteoblasts that secrete osteoid after which an ordered texture emerges, followed by mineralization. Plywood geometries are a hallmark of many trabecular and cortical bones, yet the origin of this texturing in vivo has never been shown. Nevertheless, extensive in vitro work revealed how plywood textures of fibrils can emerge from acidic molecular cholesteric collagen mesophases. This study demonstrates in sheep, which is the preferred model for skeletal orthopaedic research, that the deeper non‐fibrillar osteoid is organized in a liquid‐crystal cholesteric geometry. This basophilic domain, rich in acidic glycosaminoglycans, exhibits low pH which presumably fosters mesoscale collagen molecule ordering in vivo. The results suggest that the collagen fibril motif of twisted plywood matures slowly through self‐assembly thermodynamically driven processes as proposed by the Bouligand theory of biological analogues of liquid crystals. Understanding the steps of collagen patterning in osteoid‐maturation processes may shed new light on bone pathologies that emerge from collagen physico‐chemical maturation imbalances.
Keywords: acidity, biomineralization, bone, collagen, liquid‐crystal, osteoid, plywood
Extensive analyses of sheep bone biopsies ascertain that the deeper non‐fibrillar osteoid is organized in an acidic liquid‐crystal cholesteric geometry. Such acidic domains, most likely stabilized by glycosaminoglycans and citrate, foster collagen assembly from molecular into fibrillar plywood textures, a hallmark of many bone extracellular matrices. The results show that beyond cellular control, physicochemical thermodynamic processes drive bone maturation.
1. Introduction
A hallmark of many bones is the presence of domains containing mineralized collagen fibrils arranged in a twisted plywood architecture. This well‐known pattern is fairly common in different extracellular matrices (ECMs) and has emerged as one evolutionary strategy to produce resilient structural materials in nature.[ 1 ] Bone is unique in that this architecture is both mineralized and dynamically created: either de novo (during modeling) or when tissue is replaced (by remodeling). In both cases, mineralization occurs only after the establishment of a fibrillar organic ECM known as osteoid.[ 2 ] This soft tissue, produced by a layer of osteoblasts, comprises mainly collagen though it also contains non‐collagenous proteins (NCPs)[ 3 , 4 , 5 ] and glycosaminoglycans.[ 6 , 7 ] The biological processes involved in osteoid creation have been extensively described highlighting the important role that osteoblasts have in setting up the extracellular compartment,[ 8 , 9 ] with descriptions of two distinct layers observed in many animals and in certain sample preparations.[ 7 ] Osteoid has often been described as a disorganized soft material[ 6 ] that gradually densifies[ 10 , 11 ] and transforms into highly ordered mature bone (MB).[ 12 ] But just how the twisted plywood pattern of collagen fibrils[ 13 ] emerges in osteoid in vivo has actually never been shown.
Based on in vitro models and tissue microscopy, different texturing mechanisms of twist have been proposed. These include i) the continuous rotation of osteoblasts within the plane that they establish, with synergistic collagen production,[ 14 ] ii) the transfer of cellular tension into the ECM with pre‐stressed collagen fibrils appearing during tissue growth,[ 15 , 16 ] or iii) compaction and sliding of pre‐aligned procollagen molecules released from micro‐sized intracellular vesicles.[ 17 ] Though these proposals are very different one from another, they share the premise that the fibrillar layout in MB is created by or through forces generated by the formative osteoblast cells. Importantly, whereas observations from the literature might explain 2D lateral fibrillar packing,[ 18 ] none of the existing theories provides experimental evidence for the appearance of the long‐range and 3D twisted fibril arrangements,[ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] with a geometry often compared to cholesteric (helicoidal) liquid crystals (LC).[ 24 ] An alternative yet complementary possibility is that a LC state of matter is created in bone.[ 16 , 19 , 25 ]
Here, we show that the deeper osteoid is organized in a cholesteric liquid‐crystal geometry. We identify that this domain previously described as basophilic and non‐fibrillar is in fact made of collagen in its molecular form enriched with acidic glycosaminoglycans. This indicates that this chemical environment creates an extracellular compartment in which collagen fibril‐twist can mature. We hypothesize that this deeper osteoid layer is a LC phase essential for establishing the plywood structure found in many bone tissues. We combine histology and polarized light microscopy (PLM), X‐ray microbeam small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), and X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping with second harmonic generation (SHG) confocal laser‐scanning and electron microscopy, both scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM). Based on our observations of freshly‐extracted bone biopsies from skeletally‐mature sheep,[ 26 ] and by comparison with self‐assembly collagen/apatite in vitro essays,[ 27 ] we propose that low pH is a potent modulator of fibrillogenesis in the extracellular matrix directly contributing to plywood patterning. Our findings provide missing direct evidence for the crucial role of the cholesteric phase during texturing in bone.[ 24 , 28 ]
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Texture and Composition of the Non‐Fibrillar Deeper Osteoid
By conventional histology in sheep bone biopsies, the preferred orthopedic clinical model,[ 29 ] we demonstrate double layering of the osteoid. Goldner trichrome stained sections (trabecular Figure 1a,b; Figure S1, Supporting Information) identify the cytoplasm in red and the collagen fibrils in green–blue shades. The sequence of well‐described biological processes is reproduced in the histological slide shown in Figure 1a where the biological events are seen from left to right (arrow) revealing spatially and temporally distinct tissue‐formation stages that are typical for bone remodeling. Osteoclasts (OC) can be identified due to the multinucleate features and large size, (ca. 100 µm) and following their activation (lower inset Figure 1a; Figure S2, Supporting Information), osteoblasts (OB) appear. These later aggregate along the bone surface forming 2D sheets where they secrete a pH‐neutral osteoid (nOs). Basic fuchsin staining (magenta, Figure 1c; Figure S3a, Supporting Information) is indicative of acidic moieties which are further complemented by impregnation with a universal pH indicator essay (Figure 1d; Figure S3b, Supporting Information). Put together they highlight the co‐existence of a distinct acidic region in the osteoid in close proximity to the nOs. This double layer configuration was previously identified and described as a deeper basophilic and non‐fibrillar osteoid layer.[ 6 , 7 ] The pH indicator stain essay identifies a pH of ≈5–6, in domains that correspond to this deep osteoid (aOs). Alcian blue/Ziehl fuchsin double‐stain in an adjacent slice shown in Figure 1e, further demonstrates one possible source of this acidity, the presence of acidic glycosaminoglycans stained in violet in the aOs. These and other molecules (e.g., citrate[ 30 , 31 ] known to be bound to apatite mineral[ 32 ] and to collagen[ 33 ]) are likely to establish an extracellular acidic domain. Low pH in fact is not rare in bone tissue, for example during the resorption process by osteoclasts (Figure 1a; Figure S2, Supporting Information) (i.e., ≤ 4).[ 34 ] We further note that thick acidic domains can also be observed during healing (e.g., around bone defects as shown for example in Figure S4, Supporting Information). Similar domains are also identifiable in compact bone (see Figure 1f; Figure S5, Supporting Information) where the pH stain reveals acidity, identified in yellow, in the otherwise greenish, higher pH mature bone.
The establishment of stabilized proton‐rich domains in the deeper osteoid may be required to slow down fibrillogenesis through competition of electrostatic interactions at low pH.[ 35 ] Indeed, negative charges of collagen due to acidic residues (red, Figure 1g) are known to decrease by a ratio of 2 from pH 7 to 5 while positive charges of the basic residues remain constant (blue, Figure 1g). In this manner, electrostatic interactions between basic‐acid residues diminish with decreasing pH.
The molecular arrangement of the aOs domain was analyzed by means of PLM (Figure 1 h = Figure b seen by PLM at 0° (1h1) and after rotation of the polars (1h2)). This method reveals alternating birefringent bright and dark bands (red * in Figure 1h) that are typical for bone tissue and are characteristic of the twisted plywood organization of collagen fibrils[ 13 , 36 , 37 ] (schematically illustrated in the upper inset in Figure 1a). The nOs is not birefringent (identified by the white star, compared panels 1 and 2) whereas a birefringent helicoidal plywood pattern is always observed in aOs domains (identified between the white dashed lines). This is surprising because the deeper layer has been described as being non‐fibrillar.[ 6 ] We also observe continuous extinction of polarized light during rotation of the polars between aOs and MB which provides evidence that there is a continuity in the molecular ordering between these two domains. Importantly, alternating fringes are also observed with cholesteric LC phases made of acid‐soluble collagen molecules in vitro.[ 36 , 38 ]
We used an LC‐polscope[ 39 , 40 ] to quantify the retardance and collagen orientation (color wheel in Figure 1i) and to show the structural continuity of the birefringence patterns observed in the fully‐mineralized MB and the neighbouring aOs (Figure 1i1,2). The results are confirmed by simulations of birefringence, where profiles of cholesteric phases are determined from the pitch vector intersecting the observation cutting plane at an angle θ°. The twisted plywood geometrical model makes it possible to determine both molecular orientation and pitch (see Experimental Section). Three regions in the samples are used to demonstrate how ordering in the aOs translates into patterns of retardance (Figure 1i1,j1,2, and green panel in Figure 1j3). Changes in orientations of the cholesteric pitch perfectly correspond to the simulations (Figure S6, Supporting Information). When the cholesteric pitch vector is in the section plane (red line, θ° = 0), the azimuth is constant and the retardance exhibits a sin2 shape (Figure 1j1). The fitted half‐pitch is not constant, as it varies with different cutting orientations. In the example aOs region shown (red arrow), the half pitch is ≈8.5 µm wide. This thickness of lamellae fits very well with previous reports of half pitch of twisted plywood structures.[ 41 , 42 ] When the cutting plane is off‐axis (for example the yellow arrow), the pitch vector is out of plane. The retardance and azimuth yield more complex curves (Figure 1j2) that match a tilt θ° = 11.5°, and a larger half‐pitch of ≈17 µm. Note how, in the transition into mature bone (green–purple line), the fitted half‐pitch slightly decreases from the aOs (≈6.8 µm, green panel in Figure 1j3) to MB (≈5 µm, violet panel in Figure 1j3).
All of the above results perfectly match previous observations from the literature and suggest that acidic moieties stabilize a more acidic pH in the deep osteoid. It is known that collagen fibrils dissolve in acidic solutions in vitro.[ 38 ] It is also known that the cleavage of C and N terminals of procollagen triple‐helices secreted by the cells triggers fibrillogenesis that requires neutral pH,[ 43 ] as is found in the nOs. Our findings provide good indications for the existence of an LC state of matter in the aOs. Consequently, we propose that acidification of the matrix slows down fibrillogenesis and induces formation of cholesteric domains that are crucial for the emergence of the twisted plywood organization.
2.2. Collagen Orientation and Ultrastructure
The deeper osteoid has already been demonstrated to exist in many bones and it has been described as a non‐fibrillar materials.[ 6 ] To further confirm its nature and to investigate its ultrastructure, TEM was performed using uranyl‐stained ultrathin sections (Figure 2a–f; Figure S7, Supporting Information). The aOs appears dense with a layered smooth architecture (Figure 2a,b; FigureS7a, Supporting Information) and indeed contains only sparse large fibrils (arrows in Figure 2c; Figure S7a, Supporting Information), which is different from the typical fibrillar appearance of the nOs (Figure 2a,d) and MB (Figure 2e). Interestingly, the aOs texture resembles lyotropic (cholesteric) acidic solutions of collagen studied in vitro[ 38 ] (Figure 2f,g) with aligned non‐fibrillar domains and only a few fibrils observed locally (Figure 2f; Figure S7b, Supporting Information, fibrils identified by arrows). The lack of presence of other organic constituents (e.g., glycosaminoglycans) in the synthetic sample may be a reason for the different appearance of that collagen. Strikingly, it has been previously shown that collagen molecules can precipitate into fibrils spontaneously even at low pH at concentrations exceeding 150 mg mL−1.[ 44 ] Since collagen solutions are extremely viscous at high concentrations at which they form a physical gel (Figure 2g), our finding strongly suggests that the aOs is a cholesteric collagen‐based gel.
To identify the orientation of collagen across the molecular aOs and fibrillar MB domains, micron‐sized synchrotron X‐ray beams were used to collect SAXS on the thin biopsy sections (Figure 3a–e). Sites of X‐ray measurement (Figure 3a) were identified on histologically stained adjacent sections observed under light microscope (Figure S8a,b, Supporting Information). To avoid possible artifacts of the histological staining,[ 45 ] SAXS was performed only on unstained slices (identified by metal ring in Figure 3a; Figure S8c,d, Supporting Information). The resulting SAXS measurements (Figure S8e, Supporting Information) reveal distinct zones in the osteoid. In the overlay Figure 3b, the blue and red domains identify sites of MB and aOs, respectively. Anisotropic scattering was observed in measurement spots all across the non‐mineralized and mineralized bone regions, with well‐developed SAXS signal and gradual (vs abrupt) changes in the scattering orientation (yellow lines, e.g. compare panels 3 to 3′). The scattering in regions of MB (Figure 3c4; Figure S8e, Supporting Information), similar to previous reports,[ 46 ] is typical of highly mineralized fibrillar domains.[ 47 , 48 , 49 ] This is shown by the 67 nm reflection and the corresponding harmonics of collagen periodicity observed in the 2D SAXS pattern (Figure 3c4, red rectangle); the scattering contrast of the 1st and 3rd order reflections corresponds to fibrillar ordering and is enhanced by the distribution of mineral crystals along the collagen fibrils[ 48 , 49 ] (Figure 3d4, which corresponds to the 1D profile of the collagen SAXS signal inside the white rectangle, Figure 3d6). Note that repeated X‐ray scattering measurements within aOs domains (Figure 3c3, inside the white rectangle, and Figure S8e, Supporting Information) never showed scattering signals from fibrils (see example Figure 3e1–3) suggesting that the molecules have local order but that most of the collagen is not fibrillar as seen by TEM. Yet, the SAXS patterns also show a continuity in the collagen ordering across the aOs/MB interface, a finding that matches our observations by PLM and LC‐Polscope.
2.3. Structure‐Formation Relationships
Complementary stains of successive histological sections from the exact same tissue regions provide insights into the aOs components (Figure 4a, adjacent slices N, N+1, and N+2). The use of standard haematoxylin and eosin stains (N+1), possibly due to their pH, shows no difference in protein composition between osteoid and MB (N+2). The mineralization front is clearly identifiable by the change from pink to black, observed by von Kossa staining. Higher magnification observations (inset in N+2) show that a mineral gradient localizes at the margin of the aOs. Similar results were shown for human bone by 3D FIB‐SEM.[ 50 ] Successive slices imaged by SEM and histologically by Goldner trichrome stain (Figure 3b), identify the mineralized and non‐mineralized domains of the aOs (*) and MB. Osteoid which comprises lower atomic number (Z) elements exhibits a darker, smoother appearance compared to mineralized MB (lower panel in Figure 4b and upper panel in Figure 4c). Analysis by energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) and elemental mapping at higher magnification (Figure 4c,d), confirms the existence of a gradient of calcium (Ca in yellow) and phosphorus (P in purple) across the aOs/MB interface (ca. 10 µm). The gradient corresponds to a transition from the acidic aOs to the neutral‐pH MB.
Transition zones are relatively straightforward to image locally, but difficult to colocalize with complementary contrasts needed to compare findings over large tissue segments. Moreover, the use of subsequent sections for complementary analysis methods precludes straightforward correlation, as illustrated in Figure 5a (light microscopy), b (unstained section PLM), and c (SEM) which shows that incremental (4 µm) sections exhibit small but significant structural differences (indicated by red * in multiple sections). We therefore integrate information obtained from backscatter SEM (Figure 5d1), SHG (Figure 5d2), and XRF (Figure 5e) of the same histological bone section. To correlate the non‐mineralized segments, we make use of the presence of small amounts of Fe and Zn in the tissue that help us align results obtained by the complementary imaging modalities. Despite some tears in the 4 µm‐thick slices, the high energy back‐scattered electron micrographs exhibit normal bony structures in the mineralized trabecula surrounding the bone marrow cavity (Figure 5d1). The same slice imaged by SHG (Figure 5d2) identifies the collagen of the aOs in relation to the MB. As a guide to the eye, a dotted white line and a yellow arrowhead demarcate the osteoid tissue which is not visible by the high‐energy electrons. The SHG signal arises directly from the collagen molecules in aOs as well as fibrils in the MB (Figure 5d2) and confirms that the organization of collagen (in its free molecular or packed fibrillar form) is continuous. Note that the SHG signal originates from the polarized collagen molecules and therefore it arises from both molecules and fibrils lying orthogonal to the incoming excitation laser, as shown also in vitro for lyotropic collagen phases.[ 51 ] Curiously, collagen in aOs always has a brighter signal than SHG measurements of the adjacent mineralized tissue, possibly due to the mineral attenuating the signal emerging from the MB collagen.
In the exact same regions measured by backscattered SEM and SHG, 2D maps of high‐sensitivity XRF (Figure 5e) reveal perfectly matching distributions of Ca and P (panel e1‐2). Importantly, and unlike EDX, the XRF signal arises from the full 4 µm thickness of the bone slice, since spectra are stimulated by the incoming X‐ray beam and are not limited, as EDX is, to electron interactions on the outer 2 µm of the bone surface.[ 52 ] XRF also reveals a signal of Fe (panel e3) arising from traces of blood in the bone marrow (grey stars), resulting in an inverse contrast as compared to mineralized bone (panel e1‐2). The outer margin of the bone marrow space is the point where new layers of collagen are identified by SHG (yellow arrowheads). Curiously, all regions with chemical signals of apatite are also accompanied by a signal of Zn that is higher than what the background levels in the organic tissue (panel e4). Indeed, XRF is extremely sensitive to the ppm range of elements such as Zn, known to exist in small quantities in mineralized bone tissue.[ 53 , 54 ] Panels f1 and f4 are high resolution EDX maps of the inset rectangular regions marked in e1 and e4. There is an excellent match between EDX and XRF despite the weak Zn signal. Importantly, the Ca chemical EDX map clearly reveals embedded cells (osteocytes) in the bone lamellae; this corresponds to the back‐scattered image in panel e2. Direct comparison of the same region observed by SHG (panel f3) highlights the presence of a non‐mineralized ≈8 µm thick collagen domain juxtaposed on the mineralized bone lamellae (compare d1 and d2, f1, f2, and f3, yellow arrowhead), well matching the LC Polscope results. These results demonstrate the significance of co‐aligning very different contrasts over large tissue segments to be able to describe the arrangement of the components of the tissue. These results confirm the 3D long‐range organization of the collagen outside of the MB. They also showcase the gradual transition from non‐mineralized to mineralized MB.
2.4. Proposed Mechanism for Bone Plywood Texturing
Our results show previously‐overlooked evidence suggesting that twisted plywood containing bone comprises a state of matter that is an acidic collagen‐based mesophase gel (the aOs). Consequently, aOs is not always visible in osteoid production in other types of bone in different mammals where the osteoid thickness can vary significantly.[ 7 ] The presence of a persistent acidic zone makes it possible for the cholesteric texture to mature and stabilize. One important example for when this acidity plays a role is documented, during the remodeling process (schematically outlined in Figure 6b). We propose that there is an interplay between the biological activity of cells and the establishment of a low pH gradient that can be explained as follows:
Resorption of old bone material is induced by osteoclasts within local, defined acidic microenvironment[ 55 ] (pH ≈3–4)[ 34 ] (Figure 6b, activation phase). Different types of cells (including lining cells) participate in enzymatic digestion of old ECM components[ 56 ] while macrophages clear away the debris (Figure 6b, resorption phase). Thereafter, pre‐osteoblasts appear (Figure 6b, reversal phase) triggered by osteoclast products.[ 57 ] Recent findings show that osteoclasts remain on resorption sites in contact with osteoblast lineage cells,[ 58 ] which is often observed in bone biopsies (Figure S2, Supporting Information). The pre‐osteoblasts mature into osteoblasts and form a cellular monolayer on the resorbed surface. They secrete nOs which is made of type I collagen formed through cleavage of the C‐ and N‐ terminal ends of pro‐collagen. However, previous work has demonstrated that the nOs is not seen in all osteoid layers[ 7 ] as exemplified in Figure 6a. In bone regions that develop the twisted plywood motif, an aOs is formed where the acidity, likely preserved by the secretion of glycosaminoglycans and the remodeling canopy coverage,[ 58 ] slows down fibrillogenesis thus promoting collagen fibril twist (Figure 6b, formation phase). As the concentration of collagen molecules increases, the gel reaches the transition threshold to the cholesteric LC (depicted in the enlarged schematic in Figure 6b). We propose that the formation of aOs and plywood geometries is a thermodynamically driven maturation process in the ECM that slows down fibrillogenesis to allow structuring of the tissue. This does not exclude local cellular mechanical tension on the tissue as proposed for in vitro[ 15 , 56 ] and in vivo[ 18 ] models, nor do our observations contradict the emergence of other bone microgeometries such as disordered domains.[ 41 , 42 ] Citrate, and other NCPs[ 3 ] are stable under acidic conditions and may play a so‐far poorly described physico‐chemical role in preserving the acidic state, which remains to be tested, for example, in mice lacking Slc13a5.[ 32 ] Such molecules could maintain the local chemical gradient conditions that drive fibril precipitation.[ 59 , 60 ] The emergence of collagen fibrils might also be due to molecular concentrations exceeding 150 mg mL−1[ 44 ] and is likely assisted by water retention within proteoglycans.[ 61 ] At later stages of tissue formation and mineralization, bicarbonate from the blood[ 62 ] might help neutralize the low pH zone at the transition into MB.
Though much remains unclear regarding the control, extent, and prevalence of aOs formation, we note the significance of coupling and thermodynamic advantage of establishing and maintaining a bilayer of neutral and acidic domains (nOs to aOs) of collagen in plywood‐texture newly formed tissue. The implications are substantial also for bone pathology, where disruption or absence of an intermediate molecular twisted‐plywood order could be clinically relevant for understanding various bone disease situations. This includes, for example, Paget's bone disease, where abundant osteoid shows an abnormal appearance and structure[ 63 ] possibly as a consequence of an imbalance in aOs formation.[ 6 ] Maintaining or restoring an intermediate acidic osteoid may therefore become a possible target for novel treatment modalities.
3. Conclusion
More than 50 years of histological investigations have provided hints to how collagen molecules create the twisted plywood texture of MB. No study to date has yet revealed how the different parts of the puzzle come together. The work presented here sheds light on how the architecture of fibrillar collagen is created providing good indications for the origin of long‐range twisted plywood pattern formation. Our observations in sheep bone biopsies suggest that texture emerges from thermodynamically driven molecular ordering of a liquid crystalline collagen phase, following the same principles (i.e., lyotropic properties) described for acidic assays in vitro. This observation could also hint at an additional potential role for the large amounts of citrate synthesized by osteoblasts, beyond its involvement with mineral formation that occurs somewhat later in the bone formation process.[ 64 ] These findings complement observations found for DNA where such molecular ordering was demonstrated in condensed phases.[ 65 ] Our work has implications for other liquid crystal‐like suprafibrillar architectures creating crystallites (chitin), whiskers (cellulose) or fibrils (collagen) in different biological structures (e.g., arthropod cuticles,[ 24 , 66 ] plant cell walls,[ 67 ] cuttlefish[ 68 ] and marine mussels[ 69 ]) since thermodynamically‐driven low‐pH liquid‐crystal ordering in mesophases may be a generic strategy for biomacromolecule re‐arrangement and structuring into highly‐organized twisted plywood solid structures.
4. Experimental Section
Experimental Strategy
In accordance with protocols used for orthopedic research, a sheep model due to its similarities with humans with respect to weight, bone and joint structure, and bone regeneration was used.[ 29 ] Because osteoid tissues were found in bone remodeling sites where newly deposited bone attaches to old bone surfaces,[ 70 ] histological thin sections were collected (Figure S1a,b, Supporting Information) and analyzed (Figure S1c, Supporting Information) in and around the bone defects (e.g., Figures S1d,e and S2, Supporting Information). The degree of bone repair varies according to the depth of the defect and where it was extracted from (e.g., Figure S1d vs Figure S2a, Supporting Information). The osteoid domains, cut along different orientations with respect to the remodeling site, were occasionally larger than usually described (up to 20 vs 5 µm) (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Histological bone sections were obtained from undecalcified bone embedded in resin and stained using the complementary procedures described below. After identification of each domain of interest by stained microscopy, subsequent serial slices were either further stained (e.g., Figure 4a; Figure S3, Supporting Information) or they were analyzed with complementary optical/electron/x‐ray methods (e.g., Figure 4b and Figure 5a–c; Figure S8, Supporting Information).
Bone Samples Preparation
All bone samples were harvested from 2‐year‐old healthy French ewes from negative control experiments taken from biomaterials biocompatibility tests. The work plan was reviewed and approved by the IMM Recherche Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) prior to the initiation of this study. The Animal Care and Use Committee of IMMR was registered at the CNREEA under the Ethics Committee n°37. The animal research center (IMM‐Recherche) received an agreement (n°75‐14‐01) by the “Direction Départementale de la Protection des Populations”. The studies were performed in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care, formulated by the National Society for Medical Research, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (published by the National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, 1996), as amended by the Animal Welfare Act of 1970 (P.L 91–579) and the 1976 amendments to the Animal Welfare were followed. The surgical procedures were performed as described by Nuss et al.[ 26 ] A total of eight‐hole defects (diameter = 8 mm, depth = 13 mm) were created with a drill into the distal and proximal metaphysis of the humerus and femur of each animal (2 ewes). After washing the bone cavity with saline solution, five defects out of 16 were left empty to heal: the wound was covered, and the skin was stapled. Eight weeks after surgery, the sheep were euthanized and both femoral and humeral bones were harvested, freed from all overlying tissues and the drill holes were identified. Following animals sacrifice, bone samples were cut perpendicular to the original drill hole using a band saw revealing the round original bone defect. Histological preparation was performed immediately after extraction (see Figure S1, Supporting Information).
Bone Histological Preparation
Bone surrounding the surgical sites of the five empty defects undergoing natural‐healing was used for analysis. The samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution, dehydrated with increasing ethanol baths and immersed for one week in a solution of butyl methacrylate, methyl benzoate, polyethylene glycol, and benzoyl peroxide resin. Polymerization was triggered by addition of N,N‐dimethyl‐toluidine and the samples were placed at −20 °C for 48 h to prevent any tissue degradation due to the exothermic reaction. In each embedded sample, 4 regions (2 outer/peripheral and two in the block center) were studied within series of 9–12 thin‐cut slices, as shown in Figure S1d (Supporting Information). To facilitate good matching between stained sections and adjacent unstained sections, four micron‐thick serial thin sections were cut using tungsten carbide knives. After placement on glass slides, The resin was removed using 2‐ethoxyethylacetate and sections for staining were rehydrated. This made it possible to use consecutive triplicate sections for matching analysis between histological staining and adjacent slices analyzed by SAXS, SEM, SHG, EDX, XRF, and TEM.
Histochemical Staining
a) Goldner trichrome (Haematoxylin, Fuchsine, Light Green): Sections (n = 60) were sequentially stained and washed in series: An initial haematoxylin Weigert solution stain was followed by staining with Ponceau fuchsine. Following treatment with a 1% phosphomolybdic acid solution, the sections were stained with a light green solution. The sections were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and xylene solutions after which the slices were mounted on glass carrier slides with a resin mounting liquid. The basic haematoxylin was a useful histochemical marker of acidic osteoid, appearing red while fibrillar collagen was stained in blue/green (light green stain). In all stained regions in each slice, many red‐domains indicative of aOs were found.
b) Hematoxylin‐Eosin: Sections (n = 9) were immersed in haematoxylin solution, rinsed and stained with a 1% eosin solution. Washed sections were dehydrated with graded ethanol and xylene solutions followed by mounting. With such staining, nuclei appear purple, the cytoplasm pink and collagen appears pink–red.
c) von Kossa‐ Van Gieson staining (VK): Sections (n = 9) were preincubated with 1% silver nitrate solution under UV light and washed with 5% sodium thiosulfate solution. The sections were counterstained with Van Gieson picrofuscine, washed and dehydrated with graded ethanol and xylene solutions followed by mounting. With this von Kossa staining, calcium deposits were highlighted in brown–black, osteoid appears pink–red and hematopoietic tissue appears in yellow.
d) Basic Fuchsin (Ziehl's Fuchsin, Carl Roth, Germany): stock solution was diluted to 1/5 (v/v) in distilled water followed by immersion of section (n = 9). The basophilic stain highlights acidic histological moieties in magenta including mucopolysaccharides (glycosaminoglycans) and glycoproteins. It can also be used to track proteins in acidic pH systems and as a nuclear dye.
e) Double stain Alcian Blue/Basic Fuchsin: sections (n = 9) were immersed for 30 min in 1% (v/v) Alcian Blue 8GX at pH 0.5 (acetic acid).[ 71 ] The stain was specific for acidic mucopolysaccharides (e.g., sulfated glycosaminoglycans) and at low pH appears violet.
f) Universal indicator solution pH (Honeywell Fluka, pH 3–10): The sections (n = 9) were immersed for 10 min and rinsed with distilled water then dried at 70 °C for 30 min.
Light Optical Microscopy
Observations were performed using a transmission Zeiss Axio Scope A1, equipped with crossed polarizers, a quartz first order retardation plate and a DXM 1200CCD camera and a microscope Zeiss Axio Imager M2 equipped with a differential interference contrast (DIC microscopy also known as Nomarski) and an AxioCam MRc digital camera (Figure 1h1–2 and Figure 5b; Figures S3 and S5c–e, Supporting Information). The images were processed using the ZEN software (Zeiss). Then, bone sections were examined by a polarizing microscope (Olympus IX71) equipped with LC‐PolScope using an objective (x40, N.A. = 0.6). The sample was probed by monochromatic elliptical lights of wavelength 546 nm at different settings of a liquid crystal retarder.[ 39 ] At each pixel of the image (Figure 1i), LC‐PolScope calculates the azimuth of the director (see color wheel in Figure 1i) and the optical retardance (intensity) in the range (0–273) nm. An optical image of the measured section (Figure 1i2) helps identify the regions of interest (marked red, yellow, and green–purple) across collagen structures. The collagen molecular axis was orthogonal to the birefringence orientation.[ 40 ] Therefore, orientation fields can be simulated from geometrical models of such molecular arrangements.[ 24 ] The molecular orientation of a cholesteric phase was defined by its pitch , that can exhibit an angle θ with the cutting plane. The resulting birefringence azimuth and retardance graphs (Figure 1j1,2,3; Figure S1h, Supporting Information) were consequently the planar projections of cholesteric 3D structures. The in‐plane observed pitch was . Its planar wave vector was q = 2π/p 2D . The projection of the birefringence has two orthogonal components: one perpendicular to the pitch Δ n ⊥ = Δn.sin qx and one along the pitch Δ n ∥ = Δn.sin θ.cos qx, with Δn the phase birefringence. The retardance was and the azimuth was tan −1(Δn ⊥/Δn ∥). The observed birefringence can thus be simultaneously fitted by varying , θ, and Δn (Figure 1j1,2; Figure S6h1, Supporting Information).
Preparation of lyotropic Acidic Collagen Solution
Type I collagen molecules were extracted from rat tail tendons.[ 72 ] The acidic collagen liquid‐crystal phase was prepared according to a procedure described earlier[ 27 ] that combines injection and reverse dialysis processes but without inducing fibrils (i.e., fibrillogenesis). Briefly, a volume of a ≈3 mg mL−1 soluble acidic collagen solution (0.5 m acetic acid) was mixed with an apatite ion containing solution of 0.5 m acetic acid, 110 mm CaCl2, 33 mm NaH2PO4 and 33 mm NaHCO3. The pH was adjusted to 2.2 and the final concentration of the collagen solution was ≈1 mg mL−1 with an ionic strength of 165.9 mm. 30 mL of this mixture was continually injected in a closed dialysis chamber at 15 µL min−1 for 8 days. The bottom of the chamber contained a dialysis membrane with a molecular weight cut off of 12–14 kDa. The reverse dialysis process was set against polyethylene glycol (PEG, 35 kDa, Fluka) dissolved in 0.5 m acetic acid up to ≈300 mg mL−1. The flow of the collagen solution was controlled to maintain the same pressure on each side of the dialysis membrane. After injection of the total amount of collagen, the chamber was allowed to equilibrate for 4 days inside the PEG solution. This time was required to reach the final collagen concentration with increased viscosity.
Estimation of Collagen Triple‐Helix Charges as a Function of pH
The charges were calculated by applying acid‐basic dissociation constant for all ionizable residues (Asp, Glu, His, Lys, Tyr, Arg):
Amino‐Acid | charge at low pH | charge at high pH |
---|---|---|
Aspartic Acid | 0 | −148 |
Glutamic Acid | 0 | −236 |
Histidine | 19 | 0 |
Tyrosine | 0 | −9 |
Lysine [20% hydroxylated] | 69 | 0 |
Arginine | 158 | 0 |
The apparent pKas of the aspartic/glutamic acid were sensitive to the local dielectric constant[ 73 ] with variations that can reach four units in water.[ 74 ] PKa shifts between +0.4 and +1.4 units were used in the simulation. The values do not change the analysis of the charge evolution significantly with a pH decrease from 7 to 5.5: The basic (cationic) residues, were not influenced by the pH, since the acid (anionic) residues can be protonated, causing a decrease of the negative charge. Noteworthy, this decrease was not sufficient to inverse the net charge of the collagen molecule which was still slightly negative at lower observed pH.
Ultrastructural and Elemental Characterizations
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), unstained bone histological thin sections were coated with 10 nm of carbon and imaged with an Hitachi S‐3400N SEM with an accelerating voltage of 10 kV. Energy‐dispersive X‐rays spectroscopy (EDX) was performed using an Oxford instrument X‐MAX detector (20 mm2). Other unstained bone samples were used for transmission electron microscopy (TEM), where the histological thin sections were removed from the slide and coverslip using xylene, for embedding in araldite. For comparison, the acidic collagen liquid‐crystal sample was prepared for TEM following glutaraldehyde fixation and post‐fixation with 2% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at 4 °C. These samples were then washed in a cacodylate/saccharose buffer solution (0.05 m/0.6 m, pH 7.4), dehydrated through successive ethanol baths and embedded in araldite. Ultrathin araldite sections (≈70 nm) obtained with an ULTRACUT 7 (Leica) were stained with uranyl acetate and observed using a FEI TECNAI G2 Spirit Twin electron microscope operating at 120 kV. Backscatter electron microscopy was obtained using a PhenomXL G2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eindhoven The Netherlands) in a low vacuum (60 Pa) imaging mode with the four quadrant backscatter BSE, and an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. Complementary measurements were collected to facilitate alignment of the density and chemical maps, where Zn signatures were obtained by high‐energy (30 kV) mapping. This data was obtained in a high‐vacuum CamScan MaXim electron microscope collecting EDX spectra using a Bruker Xflash 6130 spectrometer, deconvoluted and processed by Esprit 2.0 (Bruker, Berlin, Germany).
Scanning Small‐Angle X‐Ray Scattering
Small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) measurements were obtained at the mySpot beamline,[ 75 ] synchrotron radiation facility BESSY II of the Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (HZB, Berlin, Germany). The domains of interest were identified with a metal ring attached to the unstained bone histological thin section, identified at high‐resolution using a light microscope. A 10 keV (λ = 1.2400 Å) X‐ray beam shaped using a 10 µm pinhole was used. The samples were mounted and displaced along y and z axes (lateral, vertical) performing line‐scans or 2D maps with step sizes of 10 or 20 µm. The circular illuminated area on the sample had a FWHM of ≈12 µm. The beam was monochromatized using the beamline Mo/BC DMM. The SAXS signal was acquired using an area sensitive CCD‐detector (MarMosaic 225, Mar USA), with 3072 × 3072 pixels where each pixel size was 73.242 µm2. The beam center and the sample‐detector distance were calibrated using the powder X‐ray diffraction pattern of silver behenate standard (s = 0.017 nm−1). Parasitic scattering from kapton films, pinholes and air was also collected for background correction. The measured patterns were transformed into radial or axial profiles as shown in Figure S8a–c (Supporting Information) for further processing. The SAXS signal was proportional, among other things, to the product of the contrast and the volume fraction irradiated by the X‐rays, due to the presence of mineral nanoparticles.[ 46 ]
Synchrotron X‐Ray Fluorescence Mapping
Additional 2D maps of 4 µm thick sections were collected on the mySpot beamline using an XRF silicon drift detector (ASAS‐SDD KETEK, Germany) with a 100‐mm2 sensitive active area and 167.4 eV energy resolution was used to collect Ca spectra. Similar to EDX measurements but integrating over the beam size and full sample volume, peaks corresponding to the K lines of emission spectra of Ca, Fe, Zn, and P were used to produce maps of the elements with respect to the aOs.
Second Harmonic Generation
Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) maps were recorded using a Leica SP5 II microscope (Leica Mikrosysteme Vertrieb GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). A Spectra Physics Ti: sapphire laser (Mai Tai HP, Spectra Physics, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.) with 100 fs pulse width at 80 MHz and wavelength of 910 nm generated the flux needed to generate 2‐photon interactions. The SHG collagen signal was detected in the range of 450–460 nm. The excitation wavelength was optimized using rat tendon fascicles. Images were recorded using 40× and 63× water immersion objectives with numerical apertures of 1.1 and 1.2, respectively. SHG image stacks were recorded with 1 µm depth (z)‐steps followed by measurements of the autofluorescence signal (800 nm excitation, 450–570 nm detection range).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author Contributions
P.Z. and N.N. contributed equally to this work. M.R. and C. C prepared the bone histological sections and the synthetic samples; M.R. and C.D. prepared the histological staining; M.R., M.M.G.G., and N.N. performed the PLM observations and analyzed the bone histological images; B.H. prepared bone samples for electron transmission microscopy; M.R. and N.N. performed electron transmission microscopy; I.G. performed the EDX measurements; M.R., I.G., N.N. performed scanning electron microscopy; M.R., I.Z., and N.N. performed the SAXS measurements; M.R., N.B., I.Z., M.S, and N.N. analyzed the SAXS data; A.B., F.A. performed and analyzed the Polscope experiments; P.Z. performed the SHG experiments; P.Z. and I.Z. performed the XRF experiments; J.M.K., T.A., G.C., and N.N. obtained funding; M.R., F.A., P.Z., and N.N. wrote the paper; N.B., I.Z., P.F., T.A., M.M.G.G. critically reviewed the paper; P.F., P.Z., and N.N designed and revised the final manuscript; N.N. completed and coordinated the project.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Luc Behr and IMM Recherche for providing bone samples, Lise Cailleau for the graphical illustrations, Graciela Pavon‐Djavid for helping in histological samples preparation, Laurence Choudat for helpful histological discussions, Anne Meddahi‐Pellé for clarifying the surgical procedure section, the DRITT (UPMC) and more especially Delphine Cardi, Elodie Bastin, and Isabelle Coquilleau for financial support to process bone samples. This work was supported by French state funds managed by the ANR within the Investissements d'Avenir program under reference ANR‐11‐IDEX‐0004‐02, specifically within the framework of the Cluster of Excellence MATISSE led by Sorbonne Université, and by Fondation Collège de France and Fondation EDF. The authors thank the Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin (HZB) for providing beamtime in BESSY II.
Robin M., Djediat C., Bardouil A., Baccile N., Chareyron C., Zizak I., Fratzl P., Selmane M., Haye B., Genois I., Krafft J.‐M., Costentin G., Azaïs T., Artzner F., Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., Zaslansky P., Nassif N., Acidic Osteoid Templates the Plywood Structure of Bone Tissue. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2304454. 10.1002/advs.202304454
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Neville A. C., Biology of Fibrous Composites: Development Beyond the Cell Membrane, Cambridge University Press, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Parfitt A. M., J. Cell. Biochem. 1994, 55, 273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mckee M. D., Nanci A., Microsc. Res. Tech. 1996, 33, 141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ingram R. T., Clarke B. L., Fisher L. W., Fitzpatrick L. A., J. Bone Miner. Res. 1993, 8, 1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Alford A. I., Kozloff K. M., Hankenson K. D., Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2015, 65, 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fornasier V. L., Hum. Pathol. 1977, 8, 243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Raina V., J. Clin. Pathol. 1972, 25, 229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Parfitt A. M., Bone 1993, 14, 435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jilka R. L., Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 2003, 41, 182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lapiere C. M., in Calcified Tissues 1965: Proceedings of the Third European Symposium on Calcified Tissues held at Davos (Switzerland), April 11th–16th, 1965, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 1966, pp. 20–32. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Palumbo C., Ferretti M., Palazzini S., Zaffe D., Anat. Embryol. 1995, 191, 351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Boyde A., Hobdell M. H., Z. Für Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 1968, 93, 213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Giraud‐Guille M. M., Calcif. Tissue Int. 1988, 42, 167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yamamoto T., Hasegawa T., Sasaki M., Hongo H., Tabata C., Liu Z., Li M., Amizuka N., J. Electron Microsc. 2012, 61, 113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bidan C. M., Kollmannsberger P., Gering V., Ehrig S., Joly P., Petersen A., Vogel V., Fratzl P., Dunlop J. W. C., J. R. Soc. Interface 2016, 13, 20160136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ghazanfari S., Khademhosseini A., Smit T. H., Biomaterials 2016, 97, 74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Martin R., Farjanel J., Eichenberger D., Colige A., Kessler E., Hulmes D. J. S., Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 301, 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Canty E. G., Lu Y., Meadows R. S., Shaw M. K., Holmes D. F., Kadler K. E., J. Cell Biol. 2004, 165, 553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Skedros J., Doutré M., Weaver D., Osteologie 2016, 25, 101. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Glimcher M. J., Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2006, 64, 223. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Weiner S., Wagner H. D., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1998, 28, 271. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Reznikov N., Bilton M., Lari L., Stevens M. M., Kröger R., Science 2018, 360, eaao2189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mitov M., Soft Matter 2017, 13, 4176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bouligand Y., Tissue Cell 1972, 4, 189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cowin S. C., J. Non‐Newton. Fluid Mech. 2004, 119, 155. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Nuss K. M., Auer J. A., Boos A., Rechenberg B. V., BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2006, 7, 67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wang Y., Azais T., Robin M., Vallee A., Catania C., Legriel P., Pehau‐Arnaudet G., Babonneau F., Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., Nassif N., Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Besseau L., Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 251, 197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Nunamaker D. M., Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998, 355, S56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Fu X., Li Y., Huang T., Yu Z., Ma K., Yang M., Liu Q., Pan H., Wang H., Wang J., Guan M., Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Costello L. C., Franklin R. B., Reynolds M. A., Chellaiah M., Open Bone J. 2012, 4, 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Dirckx N., Zhang Q., Chu E. Y., Tower R. J., Li Z., Guo S., Yuan S., Khare P. A., Zhang C., Verardo A., Alejandro L. O., Park A., Faugere M.‐C., Helfand S. L., Somerman M. J., Riddle R. C., De Cabo R., Le A., Schmidt‐Rohr K., Clemens T. L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2022, 119, e2212178119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Németh‐Csóka M., Exp. Pathol. 1977, 14, 40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Silver I. A., Murrills R. J., Etherington D. J., Exp. Cell Res. 1988, 175, 266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Li Y., Asadi A., Monroe M. R., Douglas E. P., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2009, 29, 1643. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., Besseau L., Martin R., J. Biomech. 2003, 36, 1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rubin M. A., Rubin J., Jasiuk I., Bone 2004, 35, 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 224, 861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Shribak M., Oldenbourg R., Appl. Opt. 2003, 42, 3009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Keikhosravi A., Liu Y., Drifka C., Woo K. M., Verma A., Oldenbourg R., Eliceiri K. W., Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 4243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Varga P., Pacureanu A., Langer M., Suhonen H., Hesse B., Grimal Q., Cloetens P., Raum K., Peyrin F., Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 8118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Reznikov N., Shahar R., Weiner S., Bone 2014, 59, 93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Hojima Y., Behta B., Romanic A. M., Prockop D. J., Anal. Biochem. 1994, 223, 173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Gobeaux F., Mosser G., Anglo A., Panine P., Davidson P., Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., Belamie E., J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 376, 1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Aido M., Kerschnitzki M., Hoerth R., Burghammer M., Montero C., Checa S., Fratzl P., Duda G. N., Willie B. M., Wagermaier W., Connect. Tissue Res. 2014, 55, 15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zizak I., Roschger P., Paris O., Misof B. M., Berzlanovich A., Bernstorff S., Amenitsch H., Klaushofer K., Fratzl P., J. Struct. Biol. 2003, 141, 208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Fratzl P., Fratzl‐Zelman N., Klaushofer K., Vogl G., Koller K., Calcif. Tissue Int. 1991, 48, 407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Fratzl P., Fratzl‐Zelman N., Klaushofer K., Biophys. J. 1993, 64, 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen J., Burger C., Krishnan C. V., Chu B., Hsiao B. S., Glimcher M. J., Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2005, 206, 43. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ayoubi M., Van Tol A. F., Weinkamer R., Roschger P., Brugger P. C., Berzlanovich A., Bertinetti L., Roschger A., Fratzl P., Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2021, 10, 2100113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. De Sa Peixoto P., Deniset‐Besseau A., Schmutz M., Anglo A., Illoul C., Schanne‐Klein M.‐C., Mosser G., Soft Matter 2013, 9, 11241. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bauer L. J., Mustafa H. A., Zaslansky P., Mantouvalou I., Acta Biomater. 2020, 109, 142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Procopio A., Malucelli E., Pacureanu A., Cappadone C., Farruggia G., Sargenti A., Castiglioni S., Altamura D., Sorrentino A., Giannini C., Pereiro E., Cloetens P., Maier J. A. M., Iotti S., ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhao X., Zhu Y., Zhu Z., Liang Y., Niu Y., Lin J., J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 4619159. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Reinholt F. P., Hultenby K., Oldberg A., Heinegård D., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 4473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Everts V., Delaissé J. M., Korper W., Jansen D. C., Tigchelaar‐Gutter W., Saftig P., Beertsen W., J. Bone Min. Res. 2002, 17, 77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Dirckx N., Van Hul M., Maes C., Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2013, 99, 170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Delaisse J.‐M., Andersen T. L., Kristensen H. B., Jensen P. R., Andreasen C. M., Søe K., Bone 2020, 141, 115628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. He G., Gajjeraman S., Schultz D., Cookson D., Qin C., Butler W. T., Hao J., George A., Biochemistry 2005, 44, 16140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kalamajski S., Oldberg Å., Matrix Biol. 2010, 29, 248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Pearle A. D., Warren R. F., Rodeo S. A., Clin. Sports Med. 2005, 24, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Bushinsky D. A., Eur. J. Nutr. 2001, 40, 238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Seitz S., Priemel M., von Domarus C., Beil F. T., Barvencik F., Amling M., Rueger J. M., Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2008, 34, 549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Dirckx N., Zhang Q., Chu E. Y., Tower R. J., Li Z., Guo S., Yuan S., Khare P. A., Zhang C., Verardo A., Alejandro L. O., Park A., Faugere M.‐C., Helfand S. L., Somerman M. J., Riddle R. C., De Cabo R., Le A., Schmidt‐Rohr K., Clemens T. L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2022, 119, e2212178119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Livolant F., Phys. Amst. 1991, 176, 117. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Sviben S., Spaeker O., Bennet M., Albéric M., Dirks J.‐H., Moussian B., Fratzl P., Bertinetti L., Politi Y., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 25581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Reis D., Vian B., Roland J.‐C., Micron 1994, 25, 171. [Google Scholar]
- 68. Checa A. G., Cartwright J. H., Sánchez‐Almazo I., Andrade J. P., Ruiz‐Raya F., Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Jehle F., Priemel T., Strauss M., Fratzl P., Bertinetti L., Harrington M. J., ACS Nano 2021, 15, 6829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Davies J. E., Int. J. Prosthodont. 1998, 11, 391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Martoja R., Martoja‐Pierson M., Initiation aux techniques de l'histologie animale, Masson, Paris: 1967. [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gobeaux F., Belamie E., Mosser G., Davidson P., Panine P., Giraud‐Guille M.‐M., Langmuir 2007, 23, 6411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Sham Y. Y., Chu Z. T., Warshel A., J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 4458. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Dwyer J. J., Gittis A. G., Karp D. A., Lattman E. E., Spencer D. S., Stites W. E., García‐Moreno E B., Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Erko A., Schäfers F., Firsov A., Peatman W. B., Eberhardt W., Signorato R., 17th Int. Congr. X‐Ray Opt. Microanal. 2004, 59, 1543. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.