Abstract
Background:
Securing a professional baseball career is a formidable task, and only a unique few can overcome the obstacles necessary to become a Major League player in the Korea Baseball Organization (KBO). When achieving a spot in a KBO Major League team, a player’s technical aspect may be influenced by their initial neuropsychological status.
Hypothesis:
Personality and neurocognitive functions influence long-term pro-baseball league success.
Study Design:
Cohort observational study.
Level of Evidence:
Level 3.
Methods:
From the start of each player’s career, we monitored the status and course of 153 baseball players in the KBO from 2009 to 2019 who agreed to participate in this study. The Korean versions of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y (STAI-KY) analyzed traits and estimated state and trait anxiety levels, respectively. The Trail Making Test (TMT) (parts A and B) assessed attention shifting, and, in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), perseverative errors determined cognitive flexibility. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to predict player status variables, with TCI and neurocognitive function variables as covariates.
Results:
High novelty-seeking scores, low state anxiety, and short TMT A results reliably predict KBO Major League participation in a player’s third year. Similarly, low state anxiety scores and high harm avoidance, reward dependence, and self-transcendence scores accurately predict KBO Major League participation in a player’s fifth year. Lastly, short TMT A results, low perseverative error scores, and high novelty-seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, and self-transcendence efficiently predict KBO Major League participation in a player’s seventh year.
Conclusion:
Draft ranking, personality, and neurocognitive function are associated with pro-baseball league achievement. In particular, personality and neuropsychological functions are associated with long-term success.
Clinical Relevance:
Clinically, sound personality and neuropsychological functions determine KBO Major League success.
Keywords: adolescent, pro-baseball success, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y, Temperament and Character Inventory, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Baseball is the most popular sport in Korea and ranks fourth in the United States. Approximately 480,000 male athletes participated in high school baseball in the United States between 2018 and 2019. 45 However, only about 60,000 of these players continued playing baseball in college, and roughly 35,000 students attended National Collegiate Athlete Association (NCAA) schools. 44 Less than 0.5% of high school and 10% of NCAA players are drafted into Major League Baseball (MLB). 32 Likewise, 1006 players (760 high school and 240 college graduates) participated in Korea’s 2022 draft, but only 100 joined a professional team. 1 Attaining a professional baseball career is challenging, and only a unique few can overcome the formidable obstacles to becoming a Major League player in the Korea Baseball Organization (KBO).10,30,31
Personality and Neurocognitive Functions are Critical For Professional Sports Success
Personality, including temperament and character, is vital for professional sports success and determining adaptability. In particular, temperament and character were associated with the biopsychosocial personality model of individual development.2,15,40 Several studies have revealed that personality predicates long-term success in professional sports.3,19,40 An athlete’s personality is integral to determining athletic performance and goals, but also continuously influences motivation.33,36 Sports require numerous simultaneous judgments, fast and efficient decision-making, and quick information extraction during dynamic situations.38,49 Skilled athletes capable of quickly adapting can allocate their attention faster and more effectively than less skilled athletes. 21 These players also employ visual scanning techniques, speed, and anticipation to improve their performance, 52 furthering the gaps between athlete levels. Thus, neurocognitive functions are paramount for professional sports success.
Sport-Cultivated Personality and Neurocognitive Functions During Adolescence
Before joining a professional sports team, players are introduced to sports during adolescence. 45 Adolescence is a critical developmental stage with the most significant physical activity and personality changes.26,43 Through sports, adolescent athletes develop skills such as coping with pressure and expectations, time and stress management, personality development, decision-making, leadership, communication, teamwork, building self-confidence, and efficacy. 24 Furthermore, exercise often shapes personality, whether independently or in a team. 4
Alongside personality changes, cognitive development occurs between ages 13 and 18, the second plasticity and frontal lobe growth phase during adolescence.8,34 Middle school athletes (aged 14-16 years) express more creativity and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses through self-reflection. They compare personal best records, decide what needs improvement, design an action plan, and create new approaches.48,56 During late adolescence (aged 16-18 years), athletes set more realistic goals for their sports abilities. When a player’s cognitive sports ability develops fully, they can comprehend and remember complex strategies. 9 Thus, players must continue to focus on their internal abilities even after becoming a professional baseball player.
Hypothesis
This study theorized that the neuropsychological status at the start of each player’s career predicts their physical and technical abilities when achieving a KBO Major League team position.
Methods
Participants
Among 229 rookie players who graduated from high school in 3 professional baseball teams from 2009 to 2012, 153 participated in this study. We monitored each participant’s status and career in the KBO from 2009 to 2019. The Chung Ang University Institutional Review Board approved this study’s protocol. All participating players provided their written and informed consent.
Study Design
During the rookie season, all players completed demographic, temperament, character, and psychological scale questionnaires, including mood and anxiety assessments. In addition, they were requested to complete an attention and working memory neurocognitive function test. We conducted neuropsychological tests only when the rookie players began their careers. Using official KBO records, we recorded each player’s status at baseline, third, fifth, and seventh years.
Measures
The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) is a personality assessment developed by Cloninger 15 that provides a comprehensive biopsychosocial personality model as it develops in each person. The Korean version of the TCI was used for trait analysis, 53 consisting of 240 true-or-false questions to evaluate 4 temperaments and 3 character dimensions. The 4 temperaments included novelty seeking (exploratory excitability, impulsiveness, extravagance, and disorderliness), harm avoidance (anticipatory worry, fear of uncertainty, shyness, fatigability, and asthenia), persistence (eagerness of effort, work hardened, ambitious, and perfectionist), and reward dependence (sentimentality, attachment, and dependence). The 3 character dimensions were self-directedness (responsibility, purposefulness, resourcefulness, self-acceptance, and congruent second nature), cooperativeness (social acceptance, empathy, helpfulness, compassion, and integrated conscience), and self-transcendence (self-forgetfulness, transpersonal identification, and spiritual acceptance). Cronbach’s α and test-retest reliability of TCI in the Korean population have been reported as 0.77 and 0.81, respectively. 53
The Beck Depressive Inventory (BDI) is a depression diagnostic and measurement with 21 questions, 6 each assigned a score based on participant response. Scores are summed, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 63. The diagnostic criteria are as follows: normal, 0 to 13; mild depression, 14 to 19; moderate depression, 20 to 28; and severe depression 29 to 63. The Korean version of the BDI has been validated for the Korean population. 55
The Korean version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y (STAI-KY) measures state anxiety by assessing temporary anxiety, nervousness, and physiological changes, such as heart palpitations and breathing fluctuations. The STAI-KY assessed both state and trait anxiety levels in participants with 40 questions related to anxiety. These questions were categorized into 2 factors, with 20 items each for state and trait anxiety. 14 Cronbach’s α of STAI-KY was 0.91 for state and 0.82 for trait anxieties.
The Trail Making Test (TMT) evaluates attention shifts from high cognitive impairment in minor stress and trauma sensitivity, 42 with motor speed and agility notably contributing to TMT success. 50 TMT includes 2 parts. In Part A, subjects draw lines on a page, consecutively connecting 25 numbers as quickly as possible. In Part B, subjects must draw lines that consecutively alternate between numbers and letters. 54 We measured the time it took for athletes to complete these tests. TMT A/B test and retest reliability in Korean adults were 0.62 and 0.53, respectively (P < 0.05). 25
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) measures cognitive flexibility.5,7,29 Patients with prefrontal cortex injuries exhibited performance deficits on the WCST and other rule-switching tasks. 23 “Perseverative” errors were the most closely associated with cognitive flexibility in the WCST, in which subjects did not follow “correct” or “wrong” feedback and continued using the previous rule. 7 Scores were recorded along several dimensions, including the category number achieved (WCST C) and the measured category with the most common perseverative errors (WCST PE). 35 WCST C and PE test and retest reliability in Korean adults were 0.584 and 0.453, respectively (P < 0.05). 41
Statistical Analysis
The Durbin-Watson test confirmed variable collinearity. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to predict participation in the KBO Major League (yes/no) at (1) 3 years, (2) 5 years, and (3) several years, with 3 distinct levels of independent variables. The 3 distinct hierarchical independence levels were as follows: the first level represents demographic factors (independent variables: student age, sports year, position, and draft ranking); the second level encompasses temperament and characteristics; and the third level encompasses neuropsychological factors (independent variables: BDI, state and trait anxieties, TMT A-B, and perseverative errors).
We defined KBO Major Leaguers as persons registered as KBO players. In addition, those who participated in games for >145 days annually and have at least 8 years of playing experience met the criteria for a KBO free-agent contract. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results
Major Leaguer Demographic Characteristics and Trajectories Over 7 Years
All participants’ mean age and sports years were 18.31 ± 0.65 and 9.83 ± 1.96 years, respectively. Player positions included pitcher (n = 76, 49.7%), catcher (n = 17, 11.1%), infield (n = 35, 22.9%), and outfield (n = 25, 16.3%) (Table 1). The mean draft ranking for all players was 53.35 ± 33.38. Among the 153 rookie players, 60 (39.2%) were full-time KBO Major Leaguers over the 7 years. Of the 51 high-draft ranking players (upper 33.3% draft ranking), only 9 (5.9%) had experience as a full-time KBO Major Leaguer during the rookie season. In the third year, 11 high-draft and 5 nonhigh-draft players had experience in the KBO Major League. In the fifth year, 10 high-draft and 19 nonhigh-draft players had KBO Major League experience. In the seventh year, 6 nonhigh-draft players had KBO Major League experience (Figure 1).
Table 1.
Demographic, temperament and characteristics, and neuropsychological factors
| Demographic characteristics | ||
| Age, years | 18.31 ± 0.65 | |
| Sports participation, years | 9.83 ± 1.96 | |
| Position | Pitcher | 76 (49.7%) |
| Catcher | 17 (11.1%) | |
| Infield | 35 (22.9%) | |
| Outfield | 25 (16.3%) | |
| Draft ranking | 53.35 ± 33.38 | |
| Temperament and Character Inventory | ||
| Novelty-seeking | 17.71 ± 5.49 | |
| Harm avoidance | 13.61 ± 6.09 | |
| Reward dependence | 16.81 ± 4.72 | |
| Persistence | 5.91 ± 1.60 | |
| Self-directedness | 24.15 ± 9.74 | |
| Cooperativeness | 29.16 ± 6.85 | |
| Self-transcendence | 15.81 ± 6.59 | |
| Neuropsychological factors | ||
| BDI | 6.04 ± 4.57 | |
| State anxiety | 35.39 ± 11.12 | |
| Trait anxiety | 39.01 ± 6.38 | |
| TMT A, seconds | 26.30 ± 11.10 | |
| TMT B, seconds | 56.58 ± 27.36 | |
| Perseverative error | 14.09 ± 7.52 | |
BDI, Beck Depressive Inventory; TMT, Trail Making Test.
Figure 1.
Major leaguer trajectories over 7 years.
Hierarchical Logistic Regression Analysis for Major Leaguers at Baseline, Third, Fifth, and Seventh Years
Models 1 (demographic factors), 2 (demographic factors + temperament and characteristics), and 3 (demographic factors + temperament and characteristics + neuropsychological factors) were associated significantly with participation in the KBO Major League in the third year. Considering Nagelkerke’s R2, Models 1-3 could explain 29.0%, 59.7%, and 84.3% of dependent variables (ongoing participation in the third year of the KBO Major League) concerning a third-year KBO Major Leaguer, respectively. High draft rankings, high novelty-seeking scores, low state anxiety, and short TMT A times were significant third-year KBO Major Leaguer predictors (Table 2).
Table 2.
Hierarchical logistic regression analysis for third-year Major Leaguers a
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Wald | P | OR | B | Wald | P | OR | B | Wald | P | OR | |
| Demographic factors | ||||||||||||
| Age | 0.001 | 0.000 | >0.99 | 1.001 | 0.068 | 0.113 | 0.74 | 1.070 | 0.329 | 0.960 | 0.33 | 1.390 |
| Sports years | 0.102 | 0.601 | 0.44 | 1.107 | 0.293 | 2.331 | 0.13 | 1.341 | 0.269 | 0.879 | 0.35 | 1.309 |
| Positions | 0.054 | 0.057 | 0.81 | 1.055 | −0.077 | 0.061 | 0.81 | 0.926 | 0.111 | 0.029 | 0.86 | 1.117 |
| Draft ranking | −0.046 | 17.554 | 0.00 | 0.955 b | −0.072 | 19.163 | 0.00 | 0.930 b | −0.076 | 6.230 | 0.01 | 0.926 b |
| TCI | ||||||||||||
| Novelty-seeking | 0.350 | 14.788 | 0.00 | 1.419 b | 0.332 | 3.839 | 0.05 | 1.394 b | ||||
| Harm avoidance | 0.118 | 3.213 | 0.07 | 1.126 | 0.080 | 0.457 | 0.50 | 1.083 | ||||
| Reward dependence | 0.157 | 5.718 | 0.02 | 1.170 b | 0.054 | 0.189 | 0.66 | 1.056 | ||||
| Persistence | 0.181 | 0.585 | 0.44 | 1.199 | 0.170 | 0.107 | 0.74 | 1.185 | ||||
| Self-directedness | 0.035 | 0.844 | 0.36 | 1.035 | 0.110 | 2.064 | 0.15 | 1.116 | ||||
| Cooperativeness | −0.020 | 0.152 | 0.70 | 0.980 | −0.070 | 0.658 | 0.42 | 0.933 | ||||
| Self-transcendence | −0.023 | 0.174 | 0.68 | 0.978 | 0.094 | 0.629 | 0.43 | 1.098 | ||||
| Neuropsychological factors | ||||||||||||
| BDI | −0.039 | 0.166 | 0.68 | 0.961 | ||||||||
| State anxiety | −0.148 | 4.922 | 0.03 | 0.863 b | ||||||||
| Trait anxiety | −0.065 | 0.308 | 0.58 | 0.937 | ||||||||
| TMT A | −0.374 | 6.901 | 0.01 | 0.688 b | ||||||||
| TMT B | −0.064 | 2.266 | 0.13 | 0.938 | ||||||||
| Perseverative error | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.97 | 1.003 | ||||||||
| Model statistics | ||||||||||||
| -2 Log likelihood | 101.771 | 65.785 | 29.130 | |||||||||
| Model χ2 | χ2 = 27.752, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 63.737, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 100.393, P < 0.01 | |||||||||
| Step χ2 | χ2 = 27.752, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 35.986, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 36.65, P < 0.01 | |||||||||
| Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.290 | 0.597 | 0.843 | |||||||||
| Class accuracy | 83.0 | 91.5 | 97.4 | |||||||||
BDI, Beck Depressive Inventory; OR, odds ratio; TCI, Temperament and Character Inventory; TMT, Trail Making Test.
B is the coefficient for the constant in the null model, Wald is the χ2 test.
bp < 0.05.
Models 1 (demographic factors), 2 (demographic factors + temperament and characteristics), and 3 (demographic factors + temperament and characteristics + neuropsychological factors) were associated significantly with participation in the KBO Major League in the fifth year. Furthermore, considering Nagelkerke’s R2, Models 1-3 could explain 23.7%, 59.9%, and 67.3% of the dependent variables (ongoing participation in the fifth year of the KBO Major League) concerning players in their fifth year, respectively (Table 3). Low state anxiety scores and high draft ranking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, and self-transcendence scores were notable fifth-year KBO Major Leaguer predictors (Table 3).
Table 3.
Hierarchical logistic regression analysis for fifth-year Major Leaguers a
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Wald | P | OR | B | Wald | P | OR | B | Wald | P | OR | |
| Demographic factors | ||||||||||||
| Age | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.97 | 1.004 | 0.030 | 0.038 | 0.85 | 1.031 | 0.118 | 0.426 | 0.51 | 1.125 |
| Sports years | −0.061 | 0.336 | 0.56 | 0.941 | 0.015 | 0.012 | 0.91 | 1.015 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.99 | 1.002 |
| Positions | 0.031 | 0.035 | 0.85 | 1.031 | 0.077 | 0.122 | 0.73 | 1.080 | 0.206 | 0.613 | 0.43 | 1.229 |
| Draft ranking | −0.029 | 17.909 | 0.00 | 0.971 b | −0.054 | 23.879 | 0.00 | 0.947 b | −0.062 | 23.003 | 0.00 | 0.939 b |
| TCI | ||||||||||||
| Novelty-seeking | 0.094 | 4.069 | 0.04 | 1.098 b | 0.056 | 1.087 | 0.30 | 1.058 | ||||
| Harm avoidance | 0.133 | 6.849 | 0.01 | 1.142 b | 0.171 | 7.375 | 0.01 | 1.187 b | ||||
| Reward dependence | 0.352 | 20.988 | 0.00 | 1.422 b | 0.359 | 17.398 | 0.00 | 1.432 b | ||||
| Persistence | 0.142 | 0.545 | 0.46 | 1.152 | 0.130 | 0.346 | 0.56 | 1.139 | ||||
| Self-directedness | 0.023 | 0.732 | 0.39 | 1.023 | 0.062 | 2.778 | 0.10 | 1.064 | ||||
| Cooperativeness | −0.007 | 0.024 | 0.88 | 0.993 | −0.006 | 0.012 | 0.91 | 0.994 | ||||
| Self-transcendence | 0.088 | 4.350 | 0.03 | 1.092 b | 0.110 | 5.199 | 0.02 | 1.116 b | ||||
| Neuropsychological factors | ||||||||||||
| BDI | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.96 | 1.002 | ||||||||
| State anxiety | −0.073 | 4.392 | 0.04 | 0.929 b | ||||||||
| Trait anxiety | −0.042 | 0.784 | 0.38 | 0.959 | ||||||||
| TMT A | −0.027 | 0.956 | 0.33 | 0.974 | ||||||||
| TMT B | 0.009 | 0.739 | 0.39 | 1.009 | ||||||||
| Perseverative error | −0.072 | 3.760 | 0.05 | 0.930 | ||||||||
| Model statistics | ||||||||||||
| -2 Log likelihood | 167.342 | 109.329 | 94.230 | |||||||||
| Model χ2 | χ2 = 28.789, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 86.801, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 101.900, P < 0.01 | |||||||||
| Step χ2 | χ2 = 28.789, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 58.013, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 15.099, P = 0.02 | |||||||||
| Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.237 | 0.599 | 0.673 | |||||||||
| Class accuracy | 71.2 | 85.0 | 90.8 | |||||||||
BDI, Beck Depressive Inventory; OR, odds ratio; TCI, Temperament and Character Inventory; TMT, Trail Making Test.
B is the coefficient for the constant in the null model, Wald is the χ2 test.
bp < 0.05.
Lastly, Models 1 (demographic factors), 2 (demographic factors + temperament and characteristics), and 3 (demographic factors + temperament and characteristics + neuropsychological factors) were associated significantly with participation in the KBO Major League in the seventh year. Similar to fifth-year predictions, when considering Nagelkerke’s R2, Models 1-3 likely explain 13.7%, 51.6%, and 62.8% of the dependent variables (ongoing participation in the seventh year of the KBO Major League) during the seventh year, respectively (Table 4). Low perseverative error scores and high draft ranking, novelty-seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, self-transcendence, and short TMT A scores were substantial seventh-year KBO Major Leaguer predictors (Table 4).
Table 4.
Hierarchical logistic regression analysis for seventh-year Major Leaguers a
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Wald | P | OR | B | Wald | P | OR | B | Wald | P | OR | |
| Demographic factors | ||||||||||||
| Age | −0.013 | 0.012 | 0.91 | 0.987 | 0.046 | 0.097 | 0.76 | 1.047 | 0.101 | 0.350 | 0.55 | 1.107 |
| Sports years | 0.026 | 0.068 | 0.79 | 1.026 | 0.062 | 0.260 | 0.61 | 1.064 | 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.90 | 1.019 |
| Positions | 0.116 | 0.500 | 0.48 | 1.123 | 0.153 | 0.494 | 0.48 | 1.166 | 0.140 | 0.293 | 0.59 | 1.150 |
| Draft ranking | −0.023 | 11.589 | <0.01 | 0.977 b | −0.038 | 15.727 | 0.00 | 0.963 b | −0.037 | 10.844 | <0.01 | 0.964 b |
| TCI | ||||||||||||
| Novelty-seeking | 0.142 | 8.240 | <0.01 | 1.153 b | 0.116 | 4.242 | 0.04 | 1.123 b | ||||
| Harm avoidance | 0.128 | 6.765 | <0.01 | 1.137 b | 0.135 | 5.717 | 0.02 | 1.144 b | ||||
| Reward dependence | 0.222 | 13.407 | 0.00 | 1.248 b | 0.212 | 10.013 | <0.01 | 1.236 b | ||||
| Persistence | 0.153 | 0.638 | 0.43 | 1.165 | 0.114 | 0.260 | 0.61 | 1.121 | ||||
| Self-directedness | 0.048 | 2.880 | 0.09 | 1.050 | 0.070 | 3.127 | 0.08 | 1.072 | ||||
| Cooperativeness | −0.046 | 1.269 | 0.26 | 0.955 | −0.056 | 1.523 | 0.22 | 0.945 | ||||
| Self-transcendence | 0.106 | 7.165 | <0.01 | 1.112 b | 0.130 | 7.776 | <0.01 | 1.138 b | ||||
| Neuropsychological factors | ||||||||||||
| BDI | 0.055 | 1.935 | 0.16 | 1.056 | ||||||||
| State anxiety | −0.013 | 0.153 | 0.70 | 0.987 | ||||||||
| Trait anxiety | −0.051 | 1.105 | 0.29 | 0.950 | ||||||||
| TMT A | −0.115 | 4.907 | 0.03 | 0.892 b | ||||||||
| TMT B | −0.006 | 0.192 | 0.66 | 0.994 | ||||||||
| Perseverative error | −0.090 | 5.502 | 0.02 | 0.914 b | ||||||||
| Model statistics | ||||||||||||
| -2 Log likelihood | 166.378 | 113.855 | 94.022 | |||||||||
| Model χ2 | χ2 = 15.367, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 67.890, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 87.723, P < 0.01 | |||||||||
| Step χ2 | χ2 = 15.367, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 52.523, P < 0.01 | χ2 = 19.833, P < 0.01 | |||||||||
| Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.137 | 0.516 | 0.628 | |||||||||
| Class accuracy | 75.8 | 86.3 | 86.9 | |||||||||
BDI, Beck Depressive Inventory; OR, odds ratio; TCI, Temperament and Character Inventory; TMT, Trail Making Test.
B is the coefficient for the constant in the null model, Wald is the χ2 test.
bp < 0.05.
Discussion
Third-Year Major Leaguers
A total of 24 players (16 new to the KBO Major League) were full-time KBO Major Leaguers during their third year. In the hierarchical logistic regression analysis, the characteristic that demonstrated the strongest association was novelty-seeking (Wald, 3.839; odds ratio [OR], 1.394; P = 0.05). In addition, low state anxiety (Wald, 4.922; OR, 0.863; P = 0.03), and short TMT A scores (Wald, 6.901; OR, 0.688; P < 0.01) possibly predicted KBO Major League participation in a player’s third year. Novelty-seeking is characterized by intense excitement or interest in response to novel stimuli or cues for potential rewards and is often associated with extroverted personalities.16,17 Furthermore, persons with high novelty-seeking traits can regulate a broad range of goal-directed behaviors and motivations, including positive emotions, energy, and focus. 39 Thus, these findings emphasize the importance of novelty-seeking temperaments in the early stages of a player’s career.
Being able to cope with anxiety at the beginning of an athlete’s career directly affects their performance; higher anxiety levels negatively impact performance.13,18,37 The short TMT results correlated with shorter cue-target interval times and flexible attentional shifting.12,21,46 The ability to shift attention in unexpected situations is crucial for KBO Major League players in their third year. Cognitive flexibility, including shift attention, enhances environmental adaptability and problem-solving in new conditions. 11 As such, we propose that adaptability and problem-solving are integral characteristics for KBO Major League players in their third year.
Fifth-Year Major Leaguers
During their fifth year, 50 players (29 new to the KBO Major League) were full-time KBO Major Leaguers. According to the statistical results, reward dependence (Wald, 17.398; OR, 1.432; P < 0.01) was the characteristic with the highest relevance. In addition, low state anxiety scores (Wald, 4.39; OR, 0.929; P = 0.04), high harm avoidance (Wald, 7.375; OR, 1.187; P < 0.01), and self-transcendence (Wald, 5.199; OR, 1.116; P = 0.02) scores were associated with KBO Major League participation in a player’s fifth year. Persons with high harm avoidance scores are often cautious, fearful, inhibited, and apprehensive. 27 Diligently investing effort into training can naturally prevent athletes from discontinuing their training and resorting to passive avoidance, thereby influencing their performance as they approach their fifth year. 39 Conversely, a high reward dependence score is linked to perseverance, diligence, and continuing behavior in anticipation of rewards. 17 This aspect motivates athletes to continue training by considering future rewards rather than immediate results. Self-transcendence is an inherent human characteristic, and its development is affiliated with self-actualization and living a meaningful life. 22
Seventh-Year Major Leaguers
A total of 42 players (6 new to the KBO Major League) were full-time KBO Major Leaguers. From our hierarchical logistic regression analysis, reward dependence demonstrated the strongest association (Wald, 10.013; OR, 1.236; P < 0.01). In addition, short TMT A (Wald, 4.907; OR, 0.892; P = 0.03), low perseverative error (Wald, 5.502; OR, 0.914; P = 0.02), and high novelty-seeking (Wald, 4.242; OR, 1.123; P = 0.04), harm avoidance (Wald, 5.717; OR, 1.143; P = 0.02), and self-transcendence (Wald, 7.776; OR, 1.138; P < 0.01) scores possibly predicted KBO Major League participation in a player’s seventh year. A player’s draft ranking impact diminishes during their seventh year, and practice and training are even more crucial. High novelty-seeking scores continue to help players learn and improve by providing ongoing motivation through positive emotions, energy, and focus. 51 A previous study revealed that pitching ability is heavily influenced by learning and experience, and it takes a long time to reach its peak. MLB players reach their peak performance relative to age, experience, and performance around 30 years. 20 However, a professional player’s stay in the KBO averages 4 to 6 years after their debut, and approximately 50% of rookie players retire before the age of 28 years. 47
High harm avoidance, reward dependence, and self-transcendence scores all contribute to a player’s ability to maintain consistent effort.22,28,39 Short TMT times and low perseverative errors remain essential for players with high attention levels and quick reaction times. One study determined that the regular player maintained better cognitive flexibility throughout the game than the reserve player, as evidenced by lower perseverative errors and short TMT times. 28 Therefore, these traits are paramount to maintaining team position when players must compete for regular playing time 7 years after their rookie season.
Limitations
There were several limitations in the current study. First, we did not include any investment data on neuropsychological functions during the third, fifth, and seventh years. In addition, success was defined by attaining a spot on the KBO Major League roster. Second, we did not consider factors like injuries, personal issues, or team conflicts over 7 years as reasons that may lead athletes to quit. Future studies should incorporate additional subjects, data details, injury and trauma histories, and other success details, including batting, home run, and earned run averages.
Conclusion
Draft ranking, personality, and neurocognitive functions are associated with long-term pro-baseball league success. As such, developing personality and neurocognitive functions during adolescence may improve chances for lengthier participation.
Footnotes
The authors report no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.
References
- 1. 2022 KBO rookie draft held. KBO Press Release (in Korean). https://www.koreabaseball.com/News/Notice/View.aspx?bdSe=8148. Accessed April 24, 2023.
- 2. Allen MS, Greenlees I, Jones M. An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(8):841-850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Allen MS, Greenlees I, Jones M. Personality in sport: a comprehensive review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;6(1):184-208. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Allen MS, Laborde S. The role of personality in sport and physical activity. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. 2014;23(6):460-465. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Amos A. A computational model of information processing in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. J Cognit Neurosci. 2000;12(3):505-519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbauch J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 1961;4(6):561-571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Berg EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psych. 1948;39(1):15-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Blows WT. Child brain development. Nurs Times. 2003;99(17):28-31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brown KA, Patel DR, Darmawan D. Participation in sports in relation to adolescent growth and development. Translat Pediatr. 2017;6(3):150-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Brustad RJ. Affective outcomes in competitive youth sport: the influence of intrapersonal and socialization factors. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1988;10(3):307-321. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Canas J, Quesada J, Antolí A, Fajardo I. Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics. 2003;46(5):482-501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Castiello U, Umiltà C. Orienting of attention in volleyball players. Int J Sport Psych. 1992;23:301-301. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chamberlain ST, Hale BD. Competitive state anxiety and self-confidence: intensity and direction as relative predictors of performance on a golf putting task. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2007;20(2):197-207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cho S. Assessment of test anxiety. J Korean Neuropsychiatr. 1989;28:668-677. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cloninger CR, Przybeck T, Svrakic DM, Wetzel R. Temperament and Character Inventory: A Guide to Its Development and Use. St. Louis: Washington University Center for Psychobiology of Personality; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR, Svrakic DM. The tridimensional personality questionnaire: US normative data. Psychol Rep. 1991;69(3):1047-1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44(6):573-588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Craft LL, Magyar TM, Becker BJ, Feltz DL. The relationship between the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 and sport performance: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2003;25(1):44-65. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Davis C, Mogk JP. Some personality correlates of interest and excellence in sport. Int J Sport Psychol. 1994;25(2):131-143 [Google Scholar]
- 20. Demiralp B, Colburn C, Koch JV. The effects of age, experience and managers upon baseball performance. J Econ Finance. 2010;36(2):481-498. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Enns JT, Richards JC. Visual attentional orienting in developing hockey players. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997;64(2):255-275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Frankl VE. Self-transcendence as a human phenomenon. J Humanis Psychol. 1966;6(2):97-106. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Goldstein B, Obrzut JE, John C, Ledakis G, Armstrong CL. The impact of frontal and non-frontal brain tumor lesions on Wisconsin card sorting test performance. Brain Cognit. 2004;54(2):110-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gould D, Carson S. Life skills development through sport: current status and future directions. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;1(1):58-78. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ha K-S, Kwon J-S, Lyoo I-K. Development and standardization of the computerized attention assessment for Korean adults. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2002:335-346 [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247-257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Han DH, Kim JH, Lee YS, et al. Influence of temperament and anxiety on athletic performance. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(3):381-389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Han DH, Park HW, Kee BS, Na C, Na D-HE, Zaichkowsky L. Performance enhancement with low stress and anxiety modulated by cognitive flexibility. Psychiatry Investig. 2011;8(3):221-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Heaton RK. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hellstedt J. Invisible players: a family systems model. Clin Sports Med. 2005;24(4):899-928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hellstedt JC. The coach/parent/athlete relationship. Sport Psychol. 1987;1(2):151-160. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Howdeshell B. Probability of playing college and professional baseball. HomeTeamsONLINE. https://media.hometeamsonline.com/photos/baseball/UPSTATESTORM/Probability_Of_Playing_Professionally.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hoyt AL, Rhodes RE, Hausenblas HA, Giacobbi PR. Integrating five-factor model facet-level traits with the theory of planned behavior and exercise. Psych Sport Exerc. 2009;10(5):565-572. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Huizinga M, Dolan CV, van der Molen MW. Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2017-2036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Iverson GL, Slick DJ, Franzen MD. Clinical normative data for the WCST-64 following uncomplicated mild head injury. Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):247-251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Judge TA, Ilies R. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. J Appl Psych. 2002;87(4):797-807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kais K, Raudsepp L. Intensity and direction of competitive state anxiety, self-confidence and athletic performance. Kinesiology. 2005;37(1):13-20. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kalén A, Bisagno E, Musculus L, et al. The role of domain-specific and domain-general cognitive functions and skills in sports performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2021;147(12):1290-1308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kang KD, Han DH, Hannon JC, Hall MS, Choi JW. Temperamental predictive factors for success in Korean professional baseball players. Psychiatry Investig. 2015;12(4):459-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. La Place JP. Personality and its relationship to success in professional baseball. Res Q Am Assoc Health, Phys Educ Recreation. 2013;25(3):313-319. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lee J-A, Shin D-K, Lee C-U, Lee M-S. Executive function in psychiatric patient groups through Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Computer Version (WCST). J Korean Neuropsychiatry Assoc. 2002:322-334. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, Hannay HJ, Fischer JS. Neuropsychological Assessment. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 43. McAdams DP, Olson BD. Personality development: continuity and change over the life course. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61(1):517-542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. National Collegiate Athlete Association. NCAA sports sponsorship and participation rates database. https://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/ncaa-sports-sponsorship-and-participation-rates-database. Accessed July 7, 2023.
- 45. National Federation of State High School Associations. Participation data. https://members.nfhs.org/participation_statistics. Accessed July 8, 2023.
- 46. Nougier V, Ripoll H, Stein J-F. Orienting of attention with highly skilled athletes. Int J Sport Psychol. 1989;20(3):205-223 [Google Scholar]
- 47. Park K-H, Lee J-H. Analysis of possibility of attaining the 1st division status, possibility of maintaining professional status after draft of Professional Baseball player. J Korean Soc Wellness. 2021;16(2):63-71. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ryckman RM, Hamel J. Perceived physical ability differences in the sport participation motives of young athletes. Int J Sport Psychol. 1993;24(3):270-283 [Google Scholar]
- 49. Scharfen HE, Memmert D. Measurement of cognitive functions in experts and elite athletes: a meta-analytic review. Appl Cognit Psychol. 2019;33(5):843-860. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Schear J. Effects of visual acuity and visual motor speed and dexterity on cognitive test performance. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;4(1):25-32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Scott WD, Winters RW, Beevers CG. Affective distress as a central and organizing symptom in depression: psychological mechanisms. In: Johnson SL, Hayes AM, Field TM, Schneiderman N, McCabe PM, eds. Stress, Coping, and Depression. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000:145-175. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(9):919-932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Sung SM, Kim JH, Yang E, Abrams KY, Lyoo IK. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the temperament and character inventory. Compr Psychiatry. 2002;43(3):235-243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wagner S, Helmreich I, Dahmen N, Lieb K, Tadic A. Reliability of three alternate forms of the trail making tests A and B. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;26(4):314-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Yu B-K, Lee H-K, Lee K-S. Validation and factor structure of Korean version of the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II): in a university student sample. Korean J Biol Psychiatry. 2011;18(3):126-133. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Zimmerman BJ, Kitsantas A. Developmental phases in self-regulation: shifting from process goals to outcome goals. J Educat Psychol. 1997;89(1):29-36. [Google Scholar]

