Skip to main content
Kidney360 logoLink to Kidney360
. 2024 Jan 25;5(1):168–169. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000271

Chest Pain and Hypotension in a Dialysis Patient

A Onome Ehinmisan 1, Raphael Rosen 2,
PMCID: PMC10917112  PMID: 38271197

Abstract

graphic file with name kidney360-5-168-g001.jpg

Keywords: cardiovascular disease, chronic hemodialysis, dialysis

Case Description

A 63-year-old man with ESKD presented to the dialysis unit with chest discomfort and hypotension. His chest pain began after his last hemodialysis treatment 2 days prior. His baseline BP was generally elevated at the initiation of dialysis treatments but upon presentation to dialysis was 93/59 mm Hg despite being 2 kg above his dry weight. He was noted to be less verbal and somewhat confused. Dialysis was initiated. but after 1 hour his systolic BP decreased to 60 mm Hg and he became somnolent. Hypotension persisted despite administration of 1 L of normal saline, and dialysis was terminated. The nephrologist evaluated the patient at the dialysis clinic before emergency medical services arrival and, cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) was performed. A large circumferential anechoic collection was noted around the heart, with right ventricular diastolic collapse (Figure 1, A and B). A diagnosis of cardiac tamponade was made.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ultrasound revealed a large circumferential pericardial effusion causing right ventricular diastolic collapse. (A) Parasternal long axis view. Red arrows indicate pericardial effusion. (B) Subcostal view. Red arrows indicate pericardial effusion. (C) Subcostal view showing resolution of pericardial effusion. LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; MV, mitral valve; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

The emergency physicians were alerted before the patient's arrival of the likely diagnosis, and arrangements were made for an immediate interventional cardiology evaluation. Within 30 minutes of arrival, 600 cc of bloody fluid was drained from the pericardium, and a pericardial drain was placed. Shock resolved immediately. Fluid studies revealed no autoimmune disease, infection, tuberculosis, or malignancy. He was diagnosed with dialysis-associated pericardial effusion. He was dialyzed daily for 7 days, and heparin was not used. Serial cardiac POCUS (performed in the dialysis unit) revealed no reaccumulation of hemorrhage (Figure 1C).

Discussion

Hypotension is a fairly common occurrence during dialysis treatments,1 often caused by ultrafiltration. The most common interventions include slowing the rate of ultrafiltration and administration of fluid boluses. In this case, the patient's hypotension preceded initiation of hemodialysis but was worsened by ultrafiltration and failed to resolve with a fluid bolus. The lack of response to a fluid bolus suggests a nonvolume-related cause of hypotension. Both septic shock and cardiogenic shock from ischemia are fairly common in patients with kidney failure2 and would have been higher on the differential than tamponade, were it not for the prompt use of POCUS. Although Beck triad of hypotension, jugular venous distention, and distant heart sounds are diagnostic of tamponade, ultrasound is an essential to the rapid evaluation of these patients.3

The availability of ultrasound and ultrasound-trained physician in the dialysis unit facilitated rapid diagnosis and treatment of this patient and avoided potential morbidity.4 Although pericarditis and pericardial disease often causes electrocardiographic changes, in uremic pericarditis and dialysis-associated pericarditis, electrocardiographic changes are often absent,3 accentuating the utility of cardiac ultrasound in making this diagnosis.

Teaching Points

  • Pericardial disease including tamponade is a potentially important cause of morbidity in patients with kidney failure.

  • POCUS can be used to rapidly evaluate intradialytic hypotension and can facilitate the early diagnosis of cardiac tamponade.

  • The finding of large anechoic collection surrounding the heart should raise suspicion for pericardial effusion.

Acknowledgment

The patient provided informed consent for the publication of this case report and image. This case has also been submitted as an abstract for the American College of Physicians (ACP) 2023 meeting.

Disclosures

R. Rosen reports the following: Other Interests or Relationships: Consulting Editor for American Journal of Kidney Diseases. The remaining author has nothing to disclose.

Funding

None.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Raphael Rosen.

Data curation: A. Onome Ehinmisan, Raphael Rosen.

Project administration: Raphael Rosen.

Supervision: Raphael Rosen.

Writing – original draft: A. Onome Ehinmisan.

Writing – review & editing: Raphael Rosen.

References

  • 1.Sulowicz W, Radziszewski A. Pathogenesis and treatment of dialysis hypotension. Kidney Int. 2006;70:S36–S39. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001975 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Krediet RT, Boeschoten EW, Dekker FW. Are the high mortality rates in dialysis patients mainly due to cardiovascular causes?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(2):481–483. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adler Y Charron P Imazio M, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the task force for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European Society of cardiology (ESC)endorsed by: the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921–2964. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koratala A, Reisinger N. POCUS for nephrologists: basic principles and a general approach. Kidney360. 2021;2(10):1660–1668. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002482021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Kidney360 are provided here courtesy of American Society of Nephrology

RESOURCES