Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 6;19(3):e0295139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295139

Uncovering the endogenous features of potassium salts’ global transfer: A complex network perspective

Bo Zhang 1, Wensong Zhang 1,*
Editor: Ayesha Afzal2
PMCID: PMC10917254  PMID: 38446795

Abstract

Potassium is a decisive strategic resource to ensure food safety production and supply, which many nations define as a critical metal. Due to the unbalanced distribution of resources and production capacity and the separation of the primary potassium-consuming and supplying countries, international trade is the main supply channel for potassium-consuming countries to acquire enough resources. Understanding the characteristics of potassium trade networks and the evolution of trade patterns is essential for supply security. To explore this issue, this paper employs the complex network theory to quantitatively analyze the evolution characteristics of the global potassium trade network (PTN) from 2000 to 2021. The results show (1) Overall, the potassium trade shows a trend of gradual prosperity, efficiency, and concentration; (2) During the two decades, the main exporting countries of potassium remained stable, while imports changed significantly; (3) The evolution of the potassium trade community has characterized the fragmentation-regionalization-high concentration over time; (4) The trade flow of PTN is unbalanced, and few countries show outstanding capabilities but a single function. These findings would help trade policymakers manage the supply of strategic raw materials more effectively.

1. Introduction

Potassium is mainly used in the production of potash fertilizers, which are widely used in agriculture and is a critical strategic resource to ensure food safety production and supply. Due to the sharp increase in demand and the scarcity of resources, potassium has been defined as a critical metal by many countries such as China, the United States, Thailand, and Brazil [14]. However, the supply of potassium is mainly concentrated in North America, Belarus, and Russia, while consumption is concentrated in countries such as China, Brazil, and India [5]. There are deviations between suppliers and consuming countries of potassium, and trade is the main global potassium salt supply channel. The trading form of potassium in the international market is mainly primary processed products. Hence, the potassium trade can be replaced by the potassium salt trade [6]. The rapid growth in demand for potassium salt and the excessive concentration of resources have enhanced competition among countries, threatening the stability of the potassium trade. Maintaining the stability of the potassium trade is essential to food safety production and national economic development.

Global potassium salt production is concentrated, and Canada, Russia, and Belarus account for 63% of total production in 2020 [7]. The international potassium supply is in a monopoly pattern, which is not conducive to the security of the global potassium supply [8]. Due to the uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the world’s economies had to follow the measures taken by their governments, which is likely to cause disruptions in supply chains [9]. Russia is a significant producer and exporter of potassium salt. With the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the increase of sanctions against Russia, many countries have begun to restrict and review the goods related to Russia [10]. Under the current potassium supply trade system, enormous demand pressure and fragility factors such as geopolitics, war, and the COVID-19 epidemic have increased the risk of interruption of the potassium supply chain [11]. The instability of trade will affect the supply of resources and damage the economy of trading countries. Therefore, studying the evolution of the potassium trade pattern is of great significance to the development of the global economy.

However, as far as we know, although some scholars have begun to pay attention to the trade of potassium, it has yet to receive enough attention. Wang and Kong constructed a complex network model of potassium trade to study the evolution characteristics of potassium country trade, focusing on trade scale, trade relationship, and trade flow distribution [12]. Song et al. employed the material flow analysis to establish the framework of the life cycle of potassium salt in China, revealing the spatiotemporal characteristics of the main potassium flow [13]. Existing studies have made some efforts in the potassium salt trade. Nevertheless, there is no systematic analysis of the trade pattern from a global perspective, and the evolution characteristics of the potassium salt international trade pattern still need to be completed.

Trade networks are complex dynamic systems with complex trade relationships between countries [14]. Traditional trade models cannot explain the highly heterogeneous characteristics of international trade networks [15]. Academically, the complex network can reveal many new features and topology dynamics of international trade entirely and partially [16]. Complex network theory is currently widely used to analyze the topological characteristics, time evolution characteristics, community evolution, and competition pattern of mineral resource trade networks, such as coal [17], fossil fuel [18], boron ore [19], lithium [20], nickel [21], barite [22]. The evolution of the global potassium salt trade pattern still needs further study. It is worth noting that studying the international trade pattern of potassium salt is essential because of the research gap in the academic field and global geopolitical instability, such as the recent Russia-Ukraine conflict that may affect the global potassium salt supply. Exploring the evolution of the international potassium salt trade pattern and identifying the critical countries in PTN is crucial for trading countries to formulate trade strategies and ensure the supply security of potassium salt.

In summary, although previous studies on the evolution characteristics of PTN have been studied, these still need to be improved. Firstly, the research is limited to a simple analysis of a specific country and needs an analysis of the evolution of the global trade pattern. Secondly, the core countries in PTN have yet to be identified. To fill this gap, this paper selects potassium salt trade data from 2000 to 2021 to construct a complex network model of global potassium salt, which is used to explore the evolution characteristics of trade patterns and identify the role of different countries in the network. This paper has two contributions: (1) the study is the first to focus on the evolving characteristics of the global trade pattern of potassium salt, providing support for government policymakers to formulate potassium trade policies in different economies. (2) This study identifies the major economies and their roles in international trade in potassium salt. This study expects to provide decision support for building a globally stable and efficient potassium salt supply by analyzing the evolution characteristics of the global potassium salt trade pattern.

This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 is the data and method. Section 3 presents the results and our main findings. Section 4 is conclusions and policy implications.

2. Methodology

2.1 Data

This paper selects the import trade data of potassium salt from 2000 to 2021, which HS code is 310420, and the description is fertilizers, mineral or chemical; potassic, potassium chloride. All data selected for this study are from UN Comtrade. This study selects the import data of potassium salt instead of export data due to the asymmetry in bilateral merchandise trade [23]. We clean and preprocess the original data and eliminate some invalid statistical units and trade relations with zero trade volume.

2.2 Complex network construction

The complex network model of potassium salt international trade C = (V,E), where V is the set of nodes, and E is the set of edges between nodes. V = {vi: i = 1, 2, …, n}, and n is the number of nodes. E = {ei: i = 1, 2, …, m}, and m is the number of edges. The matrix of the complex network model is:

C=V,E=0w1,2w2,10w1,nw2,nwn,1wn,20 (1)

In PTN, the nodes are countries, the edges are trade relations, the direction of the edges is the flow direction of potassium salt, and the weights of the edges are the trade volume.

2.3 Topological properties

2.3.1 Degree and degree distribution

The degree ki of a node vi in a graph is the number of edges linked. It is the sum of the in-degree kiin and the out-degree kiout, which represent the number of import and export relationships of a country. The greater the degree of a node, the more significant the node’s role in the network. As shown in Eq (2),

ki=kiin+kiout=j=1ndji+j=1ndij (2)

Where i and j are nodes in the network, and d refers to the actual trade relationship between country i and country j.

The degree distribution describes the distribution characteristic of the node’s number of connections [24]. If the degree distribution of all nodes in a network follows Eq (3), then the network owes scale-free characteristics, which means a small number of nodes have many connected edges.

Pkkγ (3)

Where P (k) is the proportion of nodes with degree k in the entire network, which is used to describe the distribution function of the network. γ is the power-law exponent.

2.3.2 Strength

The degree can only represent the trade relationship of nodes but not the strength of the relationship between trade nodes. Hence, this paper introduces strength, the total weight of all edges connected to the node. Strength includes in-strength Siin and out- strength Siout which represent a country’s imports and export, respectively. It is defined as Eqs (4) and (5):

Siin=j=1Nwji (4)
Siout=j=1Nwji (5)

where wji and wji represent the edge (j, i) and (i, j) weights, respectively.

2.3.3 Node centrality

Betweenness centrality measures the intermediary ability of the nodes as mediums in the network. It reflects the node’s ability to control the flow of resources in the network. The greater the value, the stronger the intermediary ability of the node. In the international trade network of potassium salt, betweenness centrality is the frequency at which a country stands on the shortest path between two other countries. The betweenness centrality of node i is as follows [25]:

BCi=xiyσxyiσxy (6)

Where σxy is the total number of shortest paths from node x to node y, and σxy(i)σxy is the number of these paths that pass node i.

The closeness centrality reflects what degree a country stands in the central position of the network. The higher the closeness centrality, the closer the economy is to other economies, and this indicator reflects an economy’s ability to anticontrol and autonomy. The more central a country is, the lower its total distance from all other nodes. The closeness centrality of node i is as follows [26]:

CCi=1itdi,j (7)

Where d(i, j) is the distance between node i and node j, the minimum length of any path connecting node i and node j. The length of a path is the sum of the weights of its edges.

2.3.4 Community detection

In international trade networks, some countries are relatively closely connected. They often form a community in which the essence is to cluster and merge closely connected similar nodes in the network. Analyzing the community structure of international trade networks can better understand the characteristics of trade patterns at the regional scale [27]. Modularity can reflect the degree of globalization of trade and the degree of community differentiation. Analyzing the choice of trade partners and the evolution of trade relations between different trade groups is currently the most commonly used method to measure the structural strength of network communities. It is defined as Eq (8) [28]:

M=12mijuijkikj2mδci,cj (8)

Where m is the total weight of all edges in the network, this paper represents the total global trade volume. uij is the weight of the edge from node i to node j. ki and kj is the sum of the weights of all edges connected to node i and node j. δ(ci, cj) is the discriminant function. If two countries i and j are in the same community, then δ(ci, cj) = 1, otherwise, δ(ci, cj) = 0.

The larger the modularity, the clearer the community structure of the network. Modularity between 0.3 and 0.7 indicates that the network has an obvious group structure [29].

2.3.5 Roles of major countries

Degree and betweenness centrality are indicators commonly used to measure the importance of nodes in complex networks [30]. The node degree emphasizes the number of edges directly connected to the node, which can explain the node’s importance to a certain extent. However, in a complex network, nodes with the same degree may play different roles [31]. Countries with large trade volumes are generally considered to play an essential role in trade networks. Nodes with high betweenness centrality usually play a vital role in maintaining effective connections between nodes in the network [32]. Hence, this study identifies a country’s role in a trade network through trade relations, volume, and intermediary capacity.

3. Results

3.1 Basic topological properties

3.1.1 Degree and degree distribution: A scale-free network

As shown in Fig 1(a), the global potassium salt trade volume increased from 24.6Mt in 2000 to 57.2Mt in 2021, showing a rapid upward trend. Affected by the global financial crisis in 2008, the trade volume reached its lowest point in 2009. Subsequently, as the global economy recovered, potassium salt trade volumes gradually returned to pre-financial crisis levels. In 2016, due to the slump in the price of potassium salt, the trade volume fell to the bottom again. Overall, the global trade volume has experienced three distinct growth periods (2000–2008, 2010–2015, 2017–2021) and two low points (2009, 2016).

Fig 1. Potassium salt trade quantity from 2000 to 2021(a) and cumulative distribution of PTN in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2021(b).

Fig 1

Scale-free features usually exist in many real networks, especially in trade networks [33]. To explore the distribution characteristics of trade relations among different countries, this paper draws the cumulative degree distribution scatter diagrams in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2021 (Fig 1(b)). It examines the structure and degree distribution characteristics of PTN. The results show that PTN approximately follows the scale-free characteristic, which also means that the importance of nodes is highly heterogeneous. In other words, PTN is a scale-free network where minority countries have many trade relationships, and majority countries have few trade relationships. Minority economies with significant trade relationships are prominent in the network and are more likely to influence the stability of the global potassium salt trade.

3.1.2 Nodal and network centrality

This paper selects the countries with higher frequency in the top 10 of betweenness centrality and closeness centrality (Fig 2). Major potassium salt suppliers such as Russia, Belarus, Canada, and China have shown a steady rise and relatively high closeness centrality, indicating that suppliers have more discourse power in PTN. This phenomenon is consistent with the view of Yuxuan et al. (2022) that the international potassium salt supply is a monopoly pattern. In international trade, a network where a minority of trade relationships control the majority of trade volume is more likely to experience a supply crisis when exposed to external shocks [34]. Major potassium salt-consuming countries such as India, Indonesia, and Brazil have low closeness centrality and fluctuate continuously during the research period. This indicates that the anticontrol capabilities and the ability to obtain resources are low.

Fig 2. Closeness centrality and betweenness centrality ranking changes of key countries in potassium salt trade from 2000 to 2021.

Fig 2

Regarding betweenness centrality, we find that developed countries such as Germany, France, and the United States have higher betweenness centrality (S1 Table), representing that developed countries in Europe and America also have a certain discourse power and a relatively high control power in PTN. It is worth noting that China, as an essential supplier and consumer country, is playing an increasingly important role in PTN, and the ranks of betweenness centrality and closeness centrality are both high and relatively stable. China is getting closer and closer to the central position, which shows that China maintains a high level of trade control power and is gradually improving its anticontrol capabilities, which the position and influence of PTN are increasing.

3.2 Evolution of trade patterns

3.2.1 Trade flow characteristics

In the two decades, the exporting countries of PTN have remained stable, mainly Russia, Canada, Germany, Israel, Belarus, and Jordan, while the importing countries have had significant changes. We map the global potassium salt trade flows in 2000, 2010, and 2021 and summarize how trade patterns have evolved (Fig 3). In 2000, the major importing countries were China, Brazil, India, France, Etc. China’s potassium salt mainly came from Russia (2960.3kt) and Canada (2198.2kt), accounting for 49% and 36% of China’s total imports, respectively. In 2010, the United States became the world’s largest potassium salt importer, accounting for 25% of the world’s total imports. Canada became the United States’ primary source of potassium salt, while China’s potassium salt mainly came from Russia. The major importing countries in 2021 are the United States, Brazil, China, Indonesia, Etc. It is worth noting that Canada, as the largest exporter of potassium salt, mainly exports to the United States and Brazil, which means that the global potassium salt trade center will shift from Asia to America. China’s imports slowly increase as the world’s largest potassium salt consumer. The reason is that the Chinese government released the "National Mineral Resources Planning (2016–2020)" in 2015, in which the potassium salt bases in Qarhan, Qinghai, and Lop Nur, Xinjiang, were chosen as the national potassium reserve bases. This led to an increase in domestic potassium mining in 2016 and improved China’s potassium self-sufficiency rate.

Fig 3. Potassium salt trade of major countries in the world in 2000 (a), 2010 (b), and 2021 (c).

Fig 3

Notably, the discovery and development of potassium deposits in Canada have changed the global supply pattern. The UK’s plans for large-scale polyhalite mining will provide an additional source of potassium, which may once again change the global supply pattern.

3.2.2 Community structure

The trading community is made up of interconnected trading economies. Nodes in the same community are closely connected, and these nodes usually have common attributes or similar functions. As per Eq (7), this paper quantifies the modularity of countries in the PTN and subsequently categorizes communities according to their modularity. The global potassium salt trade has prominent regional characteristics, forming 2–4 communities, and the rest are marginal trading countries. These small trading countries are separated because of their small trade volume and few surrounding trading countries. Fig 4 is the pattern of global potassium salt trade communities in 2000, 2010, and 2021. We choose the name of the country with the most significant trade volume in the community to name the corresponding community, such as Canada-community.

Fig 4. Community evolution of potassium salt trade.

Fig 4

(Note: The same color indicates the same community. Lines are the trade flows of major countries).

In 2000, global potassium salt trade flows were fragmented, mainly forming two communities: Canada-community and Russia-community. Canadian community mainly includes China, India, Brazil, Etc., and Russia-community mainly in developed countries in Europe and America, such as the United States and Germany. Different from the fragmentation of communities in 2000, the evolution of communities in 2010 has apparent geographical and spatial distribution characteristics, forming three major communities: North America, South America, and Europe. The United States separated from the Russia-community and joined the Canada-community, which has become an essential importer of potassium salt in PTN. European countries, such as France and Germany, joined the Russia-community. In addition, Brazil, Peru, and Argentina form the South American community. This shows that the potassium salt trade is significantly regionalized, and different trade preferences in different regions form different trade communities. Compared to 2010, the evolution of the community in 2021 has a significant change. The countries in Russia-community have nearly joined the Canada-community. In other words, the world’s major potassium salt suppliers and consumers have gradually become a trading community. With international trade globalization, the potassium salt trading community is also converging, gradually forming an efficient, stable, but centralized system. Moreover, it is worth noting that geopolitically China is more likely to be in the same community as Russia. However, China and Canada have always been in the same community.

During the research period, the global potassium salt trading community experienced the development of fragmentation-regionalization-high concentration. Trade preferences have shifted across different regions. The top exporting country is the core country in the community, and different consuming countries join different trading communities according to their different trade preferences.

3.3 Roles of major countries

This paper identifies the core countries in the network based on their trade relations (kiin and kiout), trade volumes (Siin and Siout), and intermediary capabilities (BCi), which together determine the country’s role. Where kiin and Siin indicate a country’s import capacity, kiout and Siout indicate a country’s export capacity, BCi indicates a country’s ability to control resources in the network. Table 1 shows the top 5 countries of those indicators in 2000, 2010, and 2021, and it can find that the main trading countries in potassium trade are Canada, Russia, Belarus, Israel, Germany, France, the United States, and the United Kingdom, China, Brazil, India, Indonesia, and Malaysia. Fig 5 is the radar chart drawn by the five indicators normalized by the minimum-maximum method.

Table 1. Top 5 countries by five different indicators in 2000, 2010, and 2021.

Rank 2000 2010 2021
Country Value Country Value Country Value
In-degree (kin) 1 Brazil 19 France 23 Netherlands 36
2 Malaysia 19 Malaysia 21 France 29
3 Indonesia 19 Thailand 20 Malaysia 25
4 France 17 India 19 Spain 25
5 Spain 16 Colombia 18 Germany 23
Rank 2000 2010 2021
Country Value Country Value Country Value
Out-degree (kout) 1 Germany 88 Germany 90 Germany 92
2 USA 53 USA 75 Belarus 76
3 Russian Federation 50 Russian Federation 62 Russian Federation 75
4 United Kingdom 45 Israel 53 China 71
5 Israel 42 Belgium 52 USA 64
Rank 2000 2010 2021
Country Value Country Value Country Value
In-strength (Sin) 1 Brazil 4.3 USA 10.1 USA 13.5
2 China 3.0 Brazil 6.1 Brazil 12.8
3 India 2.0 China 5.2 China 7.7
4 France 1.7 India 4.4 Indonesia 4.0
5 Malaysia 1.1 Indonesia 1.8 India 3.2
Rank 2000 2010 2021
Country Value Country Value Country Value
Out-strength (Sout) 1 Canada 6.0 Canada 15.8 Canada 24.4
2 Russian Federation 5.9 Russian Federation 7.1 Russian Federation 10.1
3 Germany 3.3 Belarus 4.8 Belarus 9.8
4 Israel 2.1 Israel 3.3 Israel 3.4
5 Belarus 1.5 Germany 3.2 Germany 3.3
Rank 2000 2010 2021
Country Value Country Value Country Value
Betweenness centrality 1 Germany 0.097 France 0.055 Germany 0.064
2 France 0.078 USA 0.055 USA 0.060
3 USA 0.047 Germany 0.042 Netherlands 0.055
4 United Kingdom 0.047 China 0.036 Russian Federation 0.040
5 India 0.046 India 0.031 Spain 0.036

Fig 5. The roles of 13 major countries in 2000,2010, and 2021.

Fig 5

The polygons in the radar chart represent a country’s trade capacity. The larger the area of the polygon in the radar chart, the stronger the comprehensive capability of the corresponding country. According to the evolution characteristics of each country’s trade relations, trade volume, and intermediary capacity, this paper divides 13 countries into three categories. The first group is Russia, the United States, China, and France. These countries show certain import and export capabilities and relatively strong intermediary capabilities. It also represents that these four countries have sufficient key information and a stable and critical transit position in the potassium salt trade. Besides, China has a great demand for potassium and is a major importer of potassium salt, but the number of countries that export potassium salt to China is four times the number of importing countries. The second group consists of major suppliers such as Germany, Israel, and Belarus, which have been important exporters in recent years. The third group consists of countries such as Brazil, India, Malaysia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Indonesia, which present a relatively single ability. We have classified Canada, the largest potassium salt exporter in the network, into the third category of countries. Although Canada contributes the most significant export volume globally, its trade structure is single, most of which flows into the United States. Canada displays high trade intensity yet weak trade relations and intermediary capabilities.

By observing the radar chart, we found that only some countries have shown significant capabilities in PTN. In other words, exporting countries only show strong export capabilities, and importing countries only show strong import capabilities. This phenomenon indicates that the trade flow of the PTN is unbalanced. The more significant the difference in the distribution of trade flows between countries with less trade relations, the smaller the distribution of trade flows between countries with more trade relations. Moreover, the distribution of trade flows becomes increasingly different over time. From a community perspective, the potassium salt trade has evolved over time and towards forming trading groups. Countries choose different trading partners according to their trade preferences, but resource access depends on the core countries of their group. The current potassium salt supply-trade pattern presents monopoly characteristics, and an overly concentrated trade relationship poses hidden dangers to the long-term stable supply.

4. Conclusions and policy implications

This paper constructs a global potassium salt trade network from 2000 to 2021. We employ complex network theory to analyze the characteristics of the global potassium salt trade, the evolution of trade patterns, and the role of major trading countries in the network. The conclusions are as follows:

  1. Overall, the potassium trade shows a trend of gradual prosperity, efficiency, and concentration. Besides, PTN is a scale-free network where minority countries have many trade relationships, and majority countries have few trade relationships. Furthermore, as an essential supplier and consumer country, China is moving closer to the center of the network, and its influence is growing.

  2. The exporting countries of potassium remained stable, while imports changed significantly. The export of potassium salt is affected by the distribution of resources. The major exporting countries have remained stable in the past 20 years, mainly Canada, Russia, Belarus, Israel, Germany, and Jordan. The import market has changed significantly. The United States has gradually influenced China’s import capacity, and the share of Canada’s exports to China has shifted to the United States. With the United States showing significant import capacity in PTN, the center of the global potassium salt trade has shifted from Asia to America.

  3. The evolution of the potassium trade community has characterized the fragmentation-regionalization-high concentration over time. In 2000, global potassium salt trade flows were fragmented; in 2010, the community evolution showed prominent geographical and spatial distribution characteristics, forming three major communities: North America, South America, and Europe; in 2021, the world’s major potassium salt suppliers and consumers will gradually become a trading community, and trade relations will be highly concentrated. In addition, the top exporting country is the core country in the community, and different consuming countries join different trading communities according to their different trade preferences.

  4. In PTN, the trade flow is unbalanced, and almost no country has shown significant capabilities. Exporting countries show strong export capabilities, and importing countries only show strong import capabilities. Only a few countries show certain import and export capabilities and intermediary capabilities. The role of major countries is divided into three levels based on trade relations, trade volume, and intermediary capabilities: the first tier is Russia, the United States, China, and France; the second tier is major suppliers such as Germany, Israel, and Belarus; the third tier is Brazil, India, Malaysia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Indonesia, which show the relatively single capabilities.

Based on the above findings, we consider the current market environment and trade characteristics and make the following suggestions for the international trade of potassium salt: firstly, the exports of potassium salt are highly concentrated, it is recommended that importing countries seek more trading partners to reduce the risk of trade disruption; secondly, economies that export a large amount of potassium salt for a long time should re-examine their resource endowment status, rationalize their exploitation, and ensure the sustainability and long-term resource supply; thirdly, potassium salt trade presents a monopoly pattern. Major importing countries such as the United States, China, India, and Brazil are recommended to propose the initiative to establish an international agency to improve the cooperative relationship between potassium salt exporters and importers to maintain a stable, efficient, and sustainable market.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Node centrality of top 10 countries from 2000 to 2021.

(DOCX)

pone.0295139.s001.docx (26.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Wensong Zhang for his help in manuscript preparation and revision.

Data Availability

All data are available from the Zenodo database (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10081614).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Ministry of Land and resources of the People’s Republic of China. Outl. Natl. Min. Resour. Plann. (2016–2020). 2018. http://www.yzx.gov.cn/2/27/72/content_2221764.html
  • 2.Sakamornsnguan K, Kretschmann J. Substance flow analysis and mineral policy: The case of potash in Thailand. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2016;3: 383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2016.03.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sipert S, Cohim E, Do Nascimento FRA. Identification and quantification of main anthropogenic stocks and flows of potassium in Brazil. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27: 32579–32593. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09526-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.USGS. Draft Critical Mineral List—Summary of Methodology and Background Information—U.S. Geological Survey; 2018.
  • 5.Yakovleva N, Chiwona AG, Manning DAC, Heidrich O. Circular economy and six approaches to improve potassium life cycle for global crop production. Resour Policy. 2021;74: 102426. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102426 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kong R, Wang M. Sustainable Research on World Potassium Resource Trade Based on Complex Network Theory. Geology; 2019. Feb. doi: 10.1002/essoar.10500819.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.USGS. 2021. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/Potassium-statistics-and-information.
  • 8.Yuxuan Z, Xutuo L, Mingyi L, Yongwei G, Dandan Z. Endowment of Potash Resources and Analysis of Investment Environment in Belarus. Northwestern Geology. 2022;55: 306–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yara Corporate Release. In: Yara Reports Improved Margins and Lower Fixed Cost. [Internet]. 2020. https://www.yara.com/corporate-releases/yara-reports-improved-margins-and-lower-fixed-cost/
  • 10.Zheng S, Zhou X, Zhao P, Xing W, Han Y, Hao H, et al. Impact of countries’ role on trade prices from a nickel chain perspective: Based on complex network and panel regression analysis. Resources Policy. 2022;78: 102930. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102930 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shao L, Jin S. Resilience assessment of the lithium supply chain in China under impact of new energy vehicles and supply interruption. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252: 119624. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119624 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang M, Kong R. STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF POTASSIUM SALT INTERNATIONAL TRADE BASED ON COMPLEX NETWORK. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2019;20: 1000–1021. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2019.10455 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song X, Geng Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Gao Z, Li M. Dynamic potassium flows analysis in China for 2010–2019. Resources Policy. 2022;78: 102803. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102803 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gao C, Sun M, Shen B. Features and evolution of international fossil energy trade relationships: A weighted multilayer network analysis. Appl Energy. 2015;156: 542–554. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Almog A, Bird R, Garlaschelli D. Enhanced Gravity Model of Trade: Reconciling Macroeconomic and Network Models. Front Phys. 2019;7: 55. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2019.00055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guertler B, Spinler S. Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;92: 224–236. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang W, Li Z, Cheng X. Evolution of the global coal trade network: A complex network analysis. Resources Policy. 2019;62: 496–506. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.10.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhong W, An H, Shen L, Dai T, Fang W, Gao X, et al. Global pattern of the international fossil fuel trade: The evolution of communities. Energy. 2017;123: 260–270. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhu M, Zhou X, Zhang H, Wang L, Sun H. International trade evolution and competition prediction of boron ore: Based on complex network and link prediction. Resources Policy. 2023;82: 103542. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103542 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen G, Kong R, Wang Y. Research on the evolution of lithium trade communities based on the complex network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2020;540: 123002. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ma Y, Wang M, Li X. Analysis of the characteristics and stability of the global complex nickel ore trade network. Resources Policy. 2022;79: 103089. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103089 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cai X, Liu C, Zheng S, Hu H, Tan Z. Analysis on the evolution characteristics of barite international trade pattern based on complex networks. Resources Policy. 2023;83: 103593. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103593 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Markhonko V. Asymmetries in official international trade statistics and analysis of globalization. In: International Conference on the Measurement of International Trade and Economic Globalization (Aguascalientes, Mexico). 2014.
  • 24.Wang C, Zhong W, Wang A, Sun X, Li T, Wang X. Mapping the evolution of international antimony ores trade pattern based on complex network. Resources Policy. 2021;74: 102421. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102421 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Freeman LC. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 1977;40: 35–41. doi: 10.2307/3033543 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bavelas A. Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1950;22: 725–730. doi: 10.1121/1.1906679 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fan Y, Ren S, Cai H, Cui X. The state’s role and position in international trade: A complex network perspective. Economic Modelling. 2014;39: 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Newman MEJ. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103: 8577–8582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E. 2004;70: 066111. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gao C, Wei D, Hu Y, Mahadevan S, Deng Y. A modified evidential methodology of identifying influential nodes in weighted networks. Physica A. 2013;392: 5490–5500. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2013.06.059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu J, Xiong Q, Shi W, Shi X, Wang K. Evaluating the importance of nodes in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2016;452: 209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.02.049 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Abbasi A, Hossain L, Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. J Informetr. 2012;6: 403–412. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Geng J-B, Ji Q, Fan Y. A dynamic analysis on global natural gas trade network. Applied Energy. 2014;132: 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi A-L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 2000;406: 378–382. doi: 10.1038/35019019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ayesha Afzal

31 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-16699Uncovering the endogenous features of potassium salts' global transfer: a complex network perspectivePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zhang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 15 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ayesha Afzal, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match.

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

“This research is supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72074199 and No. 91846301).”

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

“The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

6. Please upload a copy of Figure 9, to which you refer in your text on page 15. If the figure is no longer to be included as part of the submission please remove all reference to it within the text.

7. We note that Figures 2 and 4 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 2 and 4 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

8. We notice that your supplementary tables are included in the manuscript file. Please remove them and upload them with the file type 'Supporting Information'. Please ensure that each Supporting Information file has a legend listed in the manuscript after the references list.

9. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a very nice manuscript that presents an innovative analysis of the global trade in potassium salts, which are essential parts of the fertiliser trade and so sustain global food production. It uses international trade data from the year 2000, and presents an analysis of changes in the market since then. It cross-refers to United States Geological Survey publications that provide definitive information about the trade, from a geological perspective. The work has clearly been undertaken with great care.

As the manuscript states, with very few significant suppliers, global trade is very sensitive to disruption, with the war in Ukraine affecting the ability of Russia and Belarus to export potash. The analysis is timely, and emphasises the need of producing countries to address their ability to continue to export, and the need for importing countries to diversify the sources of their imports as far as possible.

Coming from an economic perspective, it is perhaps not surprising that the authors have not cited some of the recent (but pre-dating the war in Ukraine) publications on this topic, written from the perspective of mineral resources and agriculture. Recent reviews and analyses include:

Yakovleva, N., Chiwona. A. G., Manning, D. A. C. and Heidrich, O. (2021) Circular economy and six approaches to improve potassium life cycle for global crop production. Resources Policy, 74, 102426, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102426

Ciceri, D, Manning, D. A. C. and Allanore, A. (2015) Historical and technical developments of potassium resources. Science of the Total Environment, 502, 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.013

Manning, D. A. C. (2018) Innovation in resourcing geological materials as crop nutrients. Natural Resources Research, 27, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9347-2

Manning, D. A. C. (2010) Mineral sources of potassium for plant nutrition: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009023

The analysis that has been carried out is clearly explained, but I think that non-specialists may need more help in interpreting the text and the figures. For example, in Figure 3, maybe the major exporting countries could be named in bold or upper case text, so they are clearly visible (the arrows that cross the diagram are necessarily broad, so at first it is difficult to see the direction). Again, in Figure 4 the arrowheads are hard to see as they are at the end of the arrow; it would help if arrowheads were drawn also in the middle of the arrow, to emphasise the flow. Figure 4 could be clarified if the three categories were briefly summarised in the caption or indeed with additional text in the figure. I appreciate this is done in the main text. However, the groups are there described in terms of groups of countries, without explaining simply, ie in a very few words, why they are grouped as they are. This would help readers from other disciplinary backgrounds.

Figure 4 is especially interesting. Although some African countries are coloured, there are no arrows showing where their imports come from. Why is this? Could you comment on why Africa is not part of global trade in potassium salts? The following paper presents an early agronomic analysis of this:

Sheldrick W.F. and Lingard J. (2004). The use of nutrient audits to determine nutrient balances in Africa. Food Policy, 29, 61-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.01.004

An additional topic that could be considered in the Discussion is the possibility for disruption of the market by new products. The example I have in mind is polyhalite, and the Anglo American Woodsmith Mine (https://uk.angloamerican.com/the-woodsmith-project) that is designed to produce 20 million tonnes of polyhalite, an alternative to conventional potassium salts, for sale into the global fertilizer market. This will compete with conventional sources, and could have a major impact on trade patterns. However, although there is some trade in this material from an existing mine (ICL Boulby), it is very small. I believe, however, that China has large deposits of polyhalite that are being considered for exploitation, or are being mined at present. It would be good if the authors could comment on these new materials, although of course a similar analysis of their trade is not yet possible.

Minor comments relate mainly to the few occasions where correction to the excellent written English would improve the manuscript.

Page 1 Introduction first line: ‘are’ not ‘is’, as the verb refers to ‘fertilizers’

Introduction paragraph 3: here you should refer to some of the other papers that describe the global market in potassium, from different disciplinary perspectives.

Paragraph starting ‘Trade networks’ – do you mean ‘gold’ where the word ‘goal’ is written? Also make sure there is a space before the parenthesis when citing other papers.

Paragraph starting ‘In summary’ – line 2: ‘these’, not ‘there’.

Section 3.1.2: give the year for the citation of Yuxuan et al.

Please rewrite the sentence that follows this and describes ‘In international trade…’. As written it is difficult to understand.

Section 3.3 paragraph 2: please clearly separate the 3 groups of countries. At the moment, the second and third are described after a semicolon, making this a very long sentence. There should be a separate sentence for each group.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: David Manning

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 6;19(3):e0295139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295139.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


8 Nov 2023

Dear editor and reviewer:

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Uncovering the endogenous features of the potassium salts’ global transfer: a complex network perspective”. Those comments are really valuable and helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have studied the comments carefully and revised our paper according to your advices. We responded to your comments point by point as follows:

Editor #1: Manuscript Number: PONE-D-23-16699

Title: Uncovering the endogenous features of the potassium salts’ global transfer: a complex network perspective

Journal: Plos One

Journal requirements:

[Answer] Thank you for your suggestion. We have revised the manuscript format according to the journal's requirements. Besides, we have uploaded the related files when resubmitting the manuscript.

Reviewer #1:Manuscript Number: PONE-D-23-16699

Title: Uncovering the endogenous features of the potassium salts’ global transfer: a complex network perspective

Journal: Plos One

Comment 1: Coming from an economic perspective, it is perhaps not surprising that the authors have not cited some of the recent (but pre-dating the war in Ukraine) publications on this topic, written from the perspective of mineral resources and agriculture. Recent reviews and analyses include:

[Answer] Thank you for your suggestion. We have carefully read these papers, which is very helpful for improving our manuscript. Since this manuscript focuses on the risk of trade networks, we did not cite all of them and selected two.

Comment 2: The analysis that has been carried out is clearly explained, but I think that non-specialists may need more help in interpreting the text and the figures. For example, in Figure 3, maybe the major exporting countries could be named in bold or upper case text, so they are clearly visible (the arrows that cross the diagram are necessarily broad, so at first it is difficult to see the direction). Again, in Figure 4 the arrowheads are hard to see as they are at the end of the arrow; it would help if arrowheads were drawn also in the middle of the arrow, to emphasise the flow. Figure 4 could be clarified if the three categories were briefly summarised in the caption or indeed with additional text in the figure. I appreciate this is done in the main text. However, the groups are there described in terms of groups of countries, without explaining simply, ie in a very few words, why they are grouped as they are. This would help readers from other disciplinary backgrounds.

[Answer] Thank you for your suggestion. We have adjusted Fig.3 and Fig.4 and made the font size of the major exporting countries in Fig.3 larger. Moreover, in Fig.4, we have removed the arrow of trade relations and determined the direction of trade by the color of the line. In addition, we explain how to determine the group in a few words. The revisions we made are as follows:

“As per Eq. (7), this paper quantifies the modularity of countries in the PTN and subsequently categorizes communities according to their modularity.”

Comment 3: Figure 4 is especially interesting. Although some African countries are coloured, there are no arrows showing where their imports come from. Why is this? Could you comment on why Africa is not part of global trade in potassium salts?

[Answer] Thank you for your suggestion. This misunderstanding occurred because we did not explain it clearly. In Fig.4, the same color indicates the same community. Trade flows only include major trade countries. The figure will look very messy if we put all the trade flows. Therefore, we screen out trade relationships with relatively small trade volumes.

Comment 4: An additional topic that could be considered in the Discussion is the possibility for disruption of the market by new products. The example I have in mind is polyhalite, and the Anglo American Woodsmith Mine (https://uk.angloamerican.com/the-woodsmith-project) that is designed to produce 20 million tonnes of polyhalite, an alternative to conventional potassium salts, for sale into the global fertilizer market. This will compete with conventional sources, and could have a major impact on trade patterns. However, although there is some trade in this material from an existing mine (ICL Boulby), it is very small. I believe, however, that China has large deposits of polyhalite that are being considered for exploitation, or are being mined at present. It would be good if the authors could comment on these new materials, although of course a similar analysis of their trade is not yet possible.

[Answer] Thank you for this essential information. After our discussion, we prefer to focus on the trade issue of potassium salts. For polyhalite, this may be covered in future research. However, we have added a small discussion about polyhalite to arouse readers' thinking. The revisions we made are as follows:

“Notably, the discovery and development of potassium deposits in Canada have changed the global supply pattern. The UK's plans for large-scale polyhalite mining will provide an additional source of potassium, which may once again change the global supply pattern.”

Comment 5: Minor comments relate mainly to the few occasions where correction to the excellent written English would improve the manuscript.

[Answer] Thank you for your suggestion. These minor comments are essential for improving the manuscript. We revised the manuscript based on these comments.

In addition, we tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the other changes.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0295139.s002.docx (18.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Ayesha Afzal

16 Nov 2023

Uncovering the endogenous features of potassium salts' global transfer: a complex network perspective

PONE-D-23-16699R1

Dear Dr. Zhang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ayesha Afzal, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All of reviewer's comments have been adequately addressed and the manuscript is now suitable for publication. 

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Ayesha Afzal

21 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-16699R1

Uncovering the endogenous features of potassium salts’ global transfer: a complex network perspective

Dear Dr. Zhang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ayesha Afzal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Node centrality of top 10 countries from 2000 to 2021.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0295139.s001.docx (26.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0295139.s002.docx (18.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data are available from the Zenodo database (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10081614).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES