Abstract
A developmental venous anomaly (DVA) is a venous drainage of the associated parenchyma that is normally asymptomatic. However, a DVA located adjacent to the aqueduct can cause obstructive hydrocephalus by blocking the flow of cerebrospinal fluid. We describe a rare case of obstructive hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis secondary to a DVA. A 43-year-old man presented with sudden bilateral temporal pain during weight training. Using a 3-Tesla scanner, cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and hydrocephalus was found with mild enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and postcontrast MRI revealed that the DVA from the bilateral thalami narrowed the orifice of the aqueduct on its drainage route towards the vein of Galen. We assumed that force exerted during weight training may have caused dilation of the anomalous veins, leading to his symptom. A review of the relevant English-language literature yielded only 19 cases of aqueductal stenosis due to DVA. In comparison to these cases, the duration of symptom in our case was extremely short because the patient had a history of ventriculomegaly detected on plain computed tomography and was diagnosed quickly based on the characteristic finding of DVA: the caput medusae appearance.
Keywords: Aqueductal stenosis, Basal vein of Rosenthal, Developmental venous anomaly, Magnetic resonance imaging, Obstructive hydrocephalus
Introduction
Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are the most common cerebrovascular malformations, occurring in 2%-3% of the population [1,2]. This malformation was previously known as venous angioma, venous malformation, or medullary venous malformation [3]. Currently, DVA is the most commonly used term. Normally, a DVA involves venous drainage of its associated parenchyma without any symptoms. However, in rare situations, it can cause symptoms. In some cases, a DVA can be located adjacent to the aqueduct and block the flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), leading to obstructive hydrocephalus [1]. We present a rare case of obstructive hydrocephalus caused by stenosis of the aqueduct due to a DVA.
Case report
A 43-year-old man with a medical history of mild asymptomatic ventriculomegaly, which was detected using plain computed tomography 17 years previously, presented with sudden bilateral temporal pain during weight training. The patient underwent cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without a gadolinium-based contrast agent on the day following the onset using a 3-Tesla scanner (Magnetom Skyra; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).
T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) revealed hydrocephalus with mild enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles and a linear flow void midline along the floor of the third ventricle, while the fourth ventricle was not dilated (Fig. 1). Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and postcontrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) showed a large abnormal vein running posteriorly upward along the floor of the third ventricle ultimately drained into the vein of Galen (Figs. 2 and 3). This prominent vein was formed by the aggregation of medullary veins from the bilateral thalami and basal ganglia, similar to the caput medusae, and bridged across the orifice of the aqueduct just before draining into the Galenic system. Thus, these abnormal veins were identified as a DVA and considered to be the underlying cause of obstructive hydrocephalus. SWI also depicted an old hemorrhage at the right globus pallidus adjacent to the medullary veins of the DVA (Fig. 2). We hypothesized that the dilation of the anomalous veins caused by exerting force during weight training worsened the stenosis of the aqueduct. This exacerbation of stenosis would temporally lead to further ventricular enlargement and increased intracranial pressure, which could result in headache. The headache was relieved within a few days of the onset, without the use of medication. Surgical procedures such as endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) were not performed because of the patient's mild and transient symptom. The patient's clinical course was uneventful.
Fig. 1.
T2-weighted imaging obtained on the day following the onset shows mild enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles. The fourth ventricle is not dilated. A linear flow void is depicted midline along the floor of the third ventricle (arrows).
Fig. 2.
Susceptibility-weighted imaging obtained on the day following the onset shows a developmental venous anomaly (DVA) starting from the bilateral thalami and basal ganglia (long arrow). Old hemorrhage is depicted at the right basal ganglia (short arrow).
Fig. 3.
Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (A-E) obtained on the day following the onset shows a DVA (arrows), coursing along the floor of the third ventricle before draining into the vein of Galen. This DVA narrows the orifice of the aqueduct on its drainage route and blocks the flow of cerebrospinal fluid. A partial maximum intensity projection image based on subtraction imaging of postcontrast MRI (F) clearly depicts the DVA.
Discussion
Generally, hydrocephalus is characterized by the abnormal enlargement of the cerebral ventricles due to an imbalance between CSF production and absorption. There are two types of hydrocephalus: communicating hydrocephalus and noncommunicating hydrocephalus. The former type includes malabsorptive hydrocephalus, hypersecretory hydrocephalus, and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, whereas the latter type includes only obstructive hydrocephalus. Regarding obstructive hydrocephalus, obstruction of the CSF pathways enlarges the ventricles upstream of the flow according to the classic CSF circulation model, known as the “bulk flow model” [4,5].
Obstructive hydrocephalus with enlargement of the lateral and third ventricles, as in the present case, is caused primarily by stenosis or obstruction of the aqueduct. In adults, common causes include inflammatory septa and membranes in the aqueduct, neurocysticercosis, tectal glioma, pineal gland tumor, and pineal gland cysts [4]. In children, congenital aqueduct stenosis, neural tube defects such as myelomeningocele and Chiari II malformation, and developmental cysts should be included in the differential diagnosis [5]. In contrast, DVA is a rare cause of aqueductal stenoses.
Reflecting the current hypothesis that DVA is formed primarily as compensatory drainage veins due to congenital hypoplasia or occlusion of the original medullary veins [6], DVA is composed of medullary veins and a large collector vein that assembles these veins radially. This finding is referred to as the caput medusae appearance [1] or umbrella-like appearance [2], which is beneficial to differentiating DVA from other causes of aqueductal stenosis. The performance of SWI and postcontrast MRI would be a practical approach to detecting this appearance because both sequences are suitable for visualizing the venous system due to their high contrast. Furthermore, SWI is useful for detecting hemorrhage, which is a complication of DVA, and cavernous hemangioma, which is a comorbidity of DVA [1]. In our case, these sequences could clearly detect DVA blocking the aqueduct and an old hemorrhage adjacent to the medullary veins. Furthermore, considering both its drainage route and the review of the development of the cerebral vein [7,8], we speculated that the DVA of our patient was probably derived from the bilateral absence of the basal vein of Rosenthal.
Our review of relevant English-language literature identified only 19 cases of obstructive hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis secondary to DVA (Table 1) [9–26]. In our study, the mean age at diagnosis in these cases was 30 years (range, 0-83 years), with 55% of the cases (n = 11) being male and 45% (n = 9) being female. The most common symptom was headaches (n = 12). The duration of the chief complaint ranged from 2 days to 7 years. MRI was performed in all cases after the first clinical MRI was performed in the early 1980s [27]. The collector vein of the DVA finally drained into the Galenic system in all cases where the drainage route of the DVA was described (n = 10). The aqueduct was obstructed by an anomalous vein coursing across the orifice of the aqueduct in 8 cases and coursing along in 8 cases. ETV was performed in 11 of the cases (55%), while shunting was performed in 4 cases, stenting was performed in 1 case and conservative management was performed in 3 cases. The outcome was uneventful, with the exception of 1 case that resulted in symptomatic internal hemorrhage 15 years later. In our case, SWI depicted an old hemorrhage in the right basal ganglia, presumably due to the DVA, but it was fortunately asymptomatic. Similar to the cases reported by Xian et al. [24] and Isikbay et al. [25], the DVA of our patient coursed ventrodorsally across the orifice of the aqueduct before draining into the vein of Galen. The duration of the symptom in our case was extremely short because the previous detection of ventriculomegaly led to a quick diagnosis based on MRI, including SWI and postcontrast T1WI.
Table 1.
Reported cases of aqueductal stenosis due to DVA (English-language literature).
| Authors (Year) | Age/Sex | Complaint | Duration of chief complaint | Location of DVA | Pathway of DVA around the aqueduct | Drainage of DVA | Diagnostic procedure | Treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosenheck et al. (1937) [9] | 58/F | Mental deterioration | 5 years | Midbrain | NA | NA | Autopsy | No | Dead |
| Avman et al. (1980) [10] | 35/F | Vertex headache, indistinct vision | 7 years | Midbrain | Along (oa∼the left lateral recess) | NA | X ray, angiography, direct exploration | Stenting | Improvement |
| Watanabe et al. (1991) [11] | 39/M | Headache | 1 year | Midbrain | Across (c2) | →Precentral cerebellar vein→Galen | CT, MRI | Shunting | Improvement in images |
| Oka et al. (1993) [12] | 43/F | Seizure | 2 months | Midbrain | Along c1∼pp) | →Precentral cerebellar vein→Galen | CT, MRI, angiography | ETV | Improvement in images |
| Blackmore et al. (1996) [13] | 16/F | Occipital Headache | 2 months | Midbrain and thalamus ∼ the floor of the third ventricle | Surrounding (c1) | NA | MRI | No | No treatment |
| Bannur et al. (2002) [14] | 11/M | Occipital headache | 5 months | Midbrain ∼ the floor of the third ventricle | Along (oa∼pp) | →Subependymal vein →Galen | CT, MRI | Shunting | Improvement |
| Yagmurlu et al. (2005) [15] | 7/F | Headache | 1 month | Thalamus ∼ midbrain | Along (oa∼c1) | →A collector vein of other DVA in the right perimesencephalic sistern→Galen | MRI | No | No treatment |
| Giannetti et al. (2008) [16] | 42/M | Headache, behavior abnormalities | 1 year | The floor of the third ventricle ∼ midbrain | Along (proximal part*) | NA | CT, MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms |
| 18/M | Headache, sleepiness, inattention at school and antisocial behavior | 6 years | Midbrain ∼ the pineal region | Hairpin curve (oa) | NA | CT, MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms | |
| Guhl et al. (2011) [17] | 0/M | Delayed psychomotor development | 10 months | Midbrain ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct∼ the floor of the third ventricle | Across (oa) | →Perimesencephalic vein→Galen | CUS, MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms and images |
| Paulson et al. (2012) [18] |
0/F | Asymptomatic macrocephaly | 3 days | Thalamus ∼ the floor of the third ventricle ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct | Across (oa) | NA | CUS, MRI | VP shunt | Improvement in images |
| Inoue et al. (2013) [19] | 10/M | Headache, nausea, vomiting | 2 weeks | Cerebellar hemisphere ∼ midbrain ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct | Along (oa∼the fourth ventricle)→Across (oa) | →The vein of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure →Galen | CT, MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms and images |
| Kita et al. (2019) [20] | 83/M | Hakim's triad | 4 months | Midbrain | Across (A) | NA | MRI, endoscopy | ETV | Improvement in symptoms and images |
| Cavallo et al. (2019) [21] | 37/M | Headache, lipothymia | 1 year | Pons & cerebellar hemisphere ∼ midbrain | Along (oa∼pp) | NA | MRI, angiography | ETV | Improvement in symptoms and images |
| Higa et al. (2020) [22] | 1/M | Head circumference enlargement | 11 months | Cerebellar hemisphere ∼ midbrain | Along (oa∼the fourth ventricle) | →Internal cerebral vein →Galen | MRI | ETV | Improvement in images |
| Low & Seow (2020) [23] | 13/F | Headache | 1 year | Midbrain ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct | Across (oa) | NA | MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms and images |
| Xian et al. (2020) [24] | 47/M | Memory impairment | 5 years | Thalamus ∼ the floor of the third ventricle ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct | Across(oa) | →Galen | MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms |
| Isikbay et al. (2022) [25] | 50s*/F | Headache, bilateral leg weakness | 1 week | Thalamus ∼ the floor of the third ventricle ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct | Across(oa) | →Galen | CT, MRI, angiography | VP shunt | Internal hemorrhage 15 years later |
| Hiraga et al. (2023) [26] | 48/F | Depression | NA | The floor of the third ventricle ∼ midbrain | Across (oa) | NA | CT, MRI | ETV | Improvement in symptoms and images |
| Present case | 43/M | Headache | 2 days | Thalamus and basal ganglia ∼ the floor of the third ventricle ∼ the orifice of the aqueduct | Across (oa) | →Galen | MRI | No | No treatment |
The pathway of DVA is bolded and underlined in cases similar to the present one.
A, ampulla of the aqueduct; oa, the orifice of the aqueduct; CT, computed tomography; CUS, cranial ultrasound; c1, first constriction of the aqueduct; c2, second construction of the aqueduct; ETV, endoscopic third ventriculostomy; F, female; M, male; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not applicable; pp, posterior part of the aqueduct; VP, ventriculoperitoneal.
Details unknown.
Conclusions
We present a rare case of obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis due to a DVA. Although DVAs are mostly benign, on rare occasions a DVA can cause obstructive hydrocephalus by narrowing the CSF pathway along its route. We detected the caput medusae appearance using MRI with SWI and postcontrast T1WI.
Patient consent
Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the case report.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.Pereira VM, Geibprasert S, Krings T, Aurboonyawat T, Ozanne A, Toulgoat F, et al. Pathomechanisms of symptomatic developmental venous anomalies. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3201–3215. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.521799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abdelgawad MS, Aly RA. Value of susceptibility-weighted MR imaging (SWI) in the detection of developmental venous anomaly. Egyptian J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51(1) doi: 10.1186/s43055-020-00216-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uchino A, Sawada A, Takase Y, Abe M, Kudo S. Cerebral hemiatrophy caused by multiple developmental venous anomalies involving nearly the entire cerebral hemisphere. Clin Imaging. 2001;25(2):82–85. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(01)00254-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Langner S, Fleck S, Baldauf J, Mensel B, Kühn JP, Kirsch M. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of hydrocephalus in adults. Rofo. 2017;189(8):728–739. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-108550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kahle KT, Kulkarni AV, Limbrick DD, Warf BC. Hydrocephalus in children. Lancet. 2016;387(10020):788–799. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60694-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saito Y, Kobayashi N. Cerebral venous angiomas: clinical evaluation and possible etiology. Radiology. 1981;139(1):87–94. doi: 10.1148/radiology.139.1.7208947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Padget DH. The cranial venous system in man in reference to development, adult configuration, and relation to the arteries. Am J Anat. 1956;98(3):307–355. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000980302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lasjaunias P, Garcia-Monaco R, Rodesch G, Terbrugge K. Deep venous drainage in great cerebral vein (vein of Galen) absence and malformations. Neuroradiology. 1991;33(3):234–238. doi: 10.1007/bf00588224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosenheck C. Venous angioma of the sylvian aqueduct and the fourth ventricle associated with internal hydrocephalus and mental deterioration. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1937;38:428–438. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Avman N, Dinçer C. Venous malformation of the aqueduct of Sylvius treated by interventriculostomy: 15 years follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1980;52(3-4):219–224. doi: 10.1007/bf01402077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Watanabe A, Ishii R, Kamada M, Suzuki Y, Hirano K, Okamura H. Obstructive hydrocephalus caused by an abnormal vein in the aqueduct. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(6):960–962. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.6.0960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oka K, Kumate S, Kibe M, Tomonaga M, Maehara F, Higashi Y. Aqueductal stenosis due to mesencephalic venous malformation: case report. Surg Neurol. 1993;40(3):230–235. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(93)90072-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blackmore CC, Mamourian AC. Aqueduct compression from venous angioma: MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(3):458–460. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bannur U, Korah I, Chandy M. Midbrain venous angioma with obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurol India. 2002;50(2):207–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yagmurlu B, Fitoz S, Atasoy C, Erden I, Deda G, Unal O. An unusual cause of hydrocephalus: aqueductal developmental venous anomaly. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(6):1159–1162. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2356-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Giannetti AV, Rodrigues RB, Trivelato FP. Venous lesions as a cause of sylvian aqueductal obstruction: case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5):E1167–E1168. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325882.21118.7d. discussion E8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guhl S, Kirsch M, Lauffer H, Fritsch M, Schroeder HW. Unusual mesencephalic developmental venous anomaly causing obstructive hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(4):407–410. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.Peds114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Paulson D, Hwang SW, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A. Aqueductal developmental venous anomaly as an unusual cause of congenital hydrocephalus: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Inoue K, Yoshioka F, Nakahara Y, Kawashima M, Matsushima T. Obstructive hydrocephalus following aqueductal stenosis caused by supra- and infratentorial developmental venous anomaly: case report. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29(2):329–334. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1934-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kita D, Park C, Hayashi Y. Aqueductal developmental venous anomaly presenting with mimic symptoms of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in an elderly patient: a case report. NMC Case Rep J. 2019;6(3):83–86. doi: 10.2176/nmccrj.cr.2018-0244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cavallo C, Faragò G, Broggi M, Ferroli P, Acerbi F. Developmental venous anomaly as a rare cause of obstructive hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Sci. 2019;63(5):600–606. doi: 10.23736/s0390-5616.16.03465-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Higa N, Dwiutomo R, Oyoshi T, Tanaka S, Bohara M, Yoshimoto K. A case of developing obstructive hydrocephalus following aqueductal stenosis caused by developmental venous anomalies. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020;36(7):1549–1555. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04489-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Low SYY, Seow WT. Biventricular hydrocephalus secondary to aqueductal developmental venous anomaly. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;76:240–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xian Z, Fung SH, Nakawah MO. Obstructive hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis from developmental venous anomaly draining bilateral medial thalami: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2020;15(6):730–732. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Isikbay M, Narsinh K, Caton M, Amans M. Transitional vascular anomaly of a persistent medial procephalic vein causing obstructive hydrocephalus and intracranial haemorrhage. BJR Case Rep. 2022;8(6) doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20220064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hiraga K, Hayashi S, Oshima R, Kondo T, Kanamori F, Saito R. Mesencephalic developmental venous anomaly causing obstructive hydrocephalus: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023;5(12) doi: 10.3171/case22563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Edelman RR. The history of MR imaging as seen through the pages of radiology. Radiology. 2014;273(2):S181–S200. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140706. Suppl. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



