Abstract
Limited information is available on the variation of plant leaf hydraulic traits in relation to soil rock fragment content (RFC), particularly for xerophytes native to rocky mountain areas. In this study, we conducted a field experiment with four gradients of RFC (0, 25, 50 and 75% ν ν−1) on three different xerophytic species (Sophora davidii, Cotinus szechuanensis and Bauhinia brachycarpa). We measured predawn and midday leaf water potential (Ψleaf), leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf), Ψleaf induced 50% loss of Kleaf (P50), pressure–volume curve traits and leaf structure. A consistent response of hydraulic traits to increased RFC was observed in three species. Kleaf showed a decrease, whereas P50 and turgor loss point (Ψtlp) became increasingly negative with increasing RFC. Thus, a clear trade-off between hydraulic efficiency and safety was observed in the xerophytic species. In all three species, the reduction in Kleaf was associated with an increase in leaf mass per area. In S. davidii, alterations in Kleaf and P50 were driven by leaf vein density (VLA) and Ψtlp. In C. szechuanensis, Ψtlp and VLA drove the changes in Kleaf and P50, respectively. In B. brachycarpa, changes in P50 were driven by VLA, whereas changes in both Kleaf and P50 were simultaneously influenced by Ψtlp. Our findings suggest that adaptation to increased rockiness necessarily implies a trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in xerophytic species. Additionally, the trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety among xerophytic species is likely to result from processes occurring in the xylem and the outside-xylem hydraulic pathways. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the survival strategies and mechanisms of xerophytes in rocky soils, and provide a theoretical basis for the persistence of xerophytic species in areas with stony substrates.
Keywords: drought acclimation, leaf hydraulic traits, leaf structure, rock fragments
Introduction
Stony soils with abundant rock fragments (RFs, a particle > 2 mm in diameter) are widespread worldwide, especially in mountainous regions (Poesen and Lavee 1994, Nyssen et al. 2002, Zhang et al. 2016). The presence of RFs significantly affects soil hydraulic properties, including water retention, hydraulic conductivity and hydrological processes (e.g., water infiltration, storage and evaporation) (Baetens et al. 2009, Ma et al. 2010, Novák et al. 2011, Tetegan et al. 2011, Lai et al. 2018). In general, an increase in soil rock fragment content (RFC) tends to decrease soil water availability (SWA) because of a reduction in soil water-holding capacity and hydraulic conductivity (Tetegan et al. 2011). Recent investigations have focused on the influence of rock properties (such as primary porosity) on plant water status and drought response in rock-dominated landscapes (Korboulewsky et al. 2020, Nardini et al. 2021). These studies have verified that RFs affect various plant traits, including plant water consumption, biomass, water-use efficiency and even plant survival and mortality by altering SWA (Schwinning 2010, 2020, Mi et al. 2016, Preisler et al. 2019, Hu et al. 2021, Zhang et al. 2023). Furthermore, there is a growing trend to predict the vulnerability of species to water limitation by assessing hydraulic-associated traits (Bartlett et al. 2014, Maréchaux et al. 2015, Mitchell and O’Grady 2015). However, direct evidence of how hydraulic traits respond to varying RFC is lacking, limiting our understanding of plant acclimation processes in response to water stress in rock-dominated landscapes.
Among the hydraulic traits, those related to efficient water transport (Kleaf) and hydraulic safety (water potential (Ψleaf) inducing a 50% loss of Kleaf (P50)) are particularly important (Liu et al. 2018, Li et al. 2020, Brodribb et al. 2020) to allow species to adjust to habitats with different SWA (Ocheltree et al. 2016, Yao et al. 2021a, 2021b, Xiong and Flexas 2022). Interspecific studies have shown that Kleaf decreases with decreasing SWA (Scoffoni et al. 2012, Trifilò et al. 2016). Species with lower P50 values are more resistant to water stress and could survive in drought-prone habitats (Gortan et al. 2009, Nardini et al. 2012, Savi et al. 2017, Zhu et al. 2018, Petruzzellis et al. 2021). Nevertheless, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated how local RF conditions affect leaf hydraulic traits. Furthermore, the conclusion that lower P50 values occur in water-limited habitats comes primarily from species in temperate and tropical forests (Gleason et al. 2016). Experimental evidence shows that intraspecific variability of P50 in stem xylem is generally low (Matzner et al. 2001, Skelton et al. 2019). For xerophytic species native to rocky regions, and at the intraspecific level, results are poor. Therefore, if these conclusions are also applicable to intraspecific situations, we would expect to observe more negative P50 (high hydraulic safety) and reduced Kleaf (low hydraulic efficiency) values under high RFC conditions (H1).
In drought-prone habitats, the midday minimum daily Ψleaf value of plants often approaches or even falls below the P50 value (Johnson et al. 2009), suggesting that their leaves often experience substantial Kleaf loss (Nardini et al. 2008, 2011, Johnson et al. 2009). Furthermore, the presence of RFs could exacerbate water stress in xerophytic species in drought-prone regions. Therefore, it is important to investigate the relationships between hydraulic traits in xerophytic species in order to elucidate their acclimation processes to elevated RFC. Previous studies have revealed a trade-off between leaf hydraulic safety (P50) and efficiency (Kleaf) (Choat et al. 2012, Nardini et al. 2012, Ocheltree et al. 2016, Scoffoni and Sack 2017, Scoffoni et al. 2017), suggesting that leaf hydraulic efficiency is compromised for the sake of safety in coping with variable water stress. However, contrasting results have emerged from other investigations, with some suggesting a lack of substantial associations (Xiong and Flexas 2022), or others showing positive correlations between leaf hydraulic safety and efficiency (Yao et al. 2021a). These discrepancies may be because of species difference, as inter- and intra-specific species differ in their hydraulic responses to environmental change, potentially leading to different and conflicting conclusions. However, to date, no research has attempted to determine whether there is a trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety within single species when adapting to varying SWA. Therefore, to better understand how xerophytic species adapt to water stress in rocky environments, controlled experiments are needed to accurately explore the leaf hydraulic response to changes in RFC.
If there is a trade-off between hydraulic efficiency and safety of xerophytic species in adapting to increasing RFC, it is important to elucidate the drivers behind such a relationship. A recent study by Nardini (2022) has shown that leaf mass per area (LMA) is mechanistically correlated to physiological traits that confer drought tolerance. During drought, Kleaf is influenced by both the xylem (Kx) (Scoffoni et al. 2011, Buckley et al. 2015) and/or the outside-xylem compartment (Kox) (Gascó et al. 2004, Yao et al. 2021a). The accumulation of xylem embolism in the vein system is the main reason for the decrease in Kx (Nardini et al. 2001, Scoffoni et al. 2017, Trifilò et al. 2021). Species with higher major leaf vein density (VLAmajor) typically exhibit increased resistance to embolism (as evidenced by more negative P50 values) because of the presence of numerous alternative pathways for water movement across the leaf. Consequently, a higher density of VLAmajor serves to mitigate the negative effects of drought on Kx (Nardini et al. 2003a, Scoffoni et al. 2011). Furthermore, VLAmajor is inversely correlated with leaf area (Scoffoni et al. 2011, Mauri et al. 2020), and this is often coupled with high LMA because of the dense vascular structure (Blonder et al. 2011, Nardini et al. 2012, John et al. 2017). Recent research has indicated that lower Kleaf can also be attributed to reduced minor vein density (VLAminor) (Yao et al. 2021b). Therefore, modifications of the leaf vein system associated with leaf embolism resistance might translate into leaf tissue density, which could have a direct effect on LMA (Wang et al. 2021).
Another important determinant of Kleaf decline is the loss of cell turgor (Ψtlp), which induces cell and leaf shrinkage (Canny et al. 2011) and leads to reduction in KOX by hindering apoplastic water movement in the mesophyll (Scoffoni et al. 2014, Trifilò et al. 2016, Abate et al. 2021). Therefore, a more negative Ψtlp, which reduces the risk of cell shrinkage, can help to maintain a relatively constant KOX under drought conditions (Farrell et al. 2017). Furthermore, other traits related to pressure–volume (P–V) curve, such as leaf capacitance (Cleaf), cell osmotic potential (π0) and cell wall elastic modulus (ε), could also influence the variation in Ψtlp and might further translate into Kleaf drop (Bartlett et al. 2012, Turner 2017). Some studies have shown significant correlations between leaf Ψtlp and P50 in different species in habitats that differ in long-term SWA (Blackman et al. 2010, Nardini et al. 2012, Nardini and Luglio 2014). Thus, Ψtlp and associated cellular traits provide an indirect linkage between P50 and LMA. Despite extensive investigations of trade-off correlations involving Kleaf, P–V traits, P50 and LMA under different environmental conditions (Zhu et al. 2013, Gleason et al. 2016, Louis et al. 2018), the influence of RFs on these traits remains unclear, especially for xerophytic species native to arid regions. In general, leaves with high LMA were more frequently observed in nutrient- and water-limited habitats (Nardini 2022). As LMA comprehensively reflects variation in leaf structure (mainly including leaf vein traits and cell characteristics, reflected by P–V traits in the present study) in response to environmental change (Poorter et al. 2009), we hypothesized that the increasing RFC would directly affect the LMA, which is mechanistically linked to leaf vein traits, outside-xylem tissue traits (i.e., Ψtlp) and the maintenance of Kx and Kox, ultimately driving the trade-off correlations between hydraulic efficiency and safety (H2).
A field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of increasing RF addition treatments (0, 25, 50 and 75%, ν ν−1) on leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety traits, as well as their relationship in three xerophytic species. The experiment allowed for the simultaneous assessment of responses in hydraulically related traits within and between species as RFC increased. The aim of this study was to answer the following questions. (i) How do leaf hydraulic-related traits of xerophytic species respond to increasing RFC? (ii) Is there an inherent trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in these three xerophytes? (iii) What are the contributing factors that influence this trade-off among xerophytic species in response to changes in RFC?
Materials and methods
Study site and experimental design
The RF addition experiment was carried out in a common garden located on Jingzhou Hill in Maoxian County, Sichuan, China (31°70′N, 103°87′E) at an elevation of 1637 m. The site experiences a mean annual temperature of 15.6 °C (Hu et al. 2021) and an annual potential evaporation of 1332 mm. The mean annual precipitation is 494.8 mm, with ~80% of falling during the growing season (May–October) (Bao et al. 2012). The soil at the site is classified as Cinnamon, with a coarse texture that extends to a depth of 50–70 cm (FAO-UNESCO 1988, Bao et al. 2012). The site was previously used for cultivating potatoes and celery until April 2016, which meant a 2-year interval before the of the current study began.
This study focuses on the three most common xerophytic species found in the dry valley of the Minjiang River (31°42′N, 103°53′E, altitude range of 1600–1920 m). Sophora davidii is a species that typically fixes nitrogen and has strong drought tolerance (Li et al. 2009). Bauhinia brachycarpa is legume that relies on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for growth but does not have the ability to fix nitrogen (Li et al. 2010). Cotinus szechuanensis is a slow-growing species that is characterized by a deep root system (Hu et al. 2021). The Minjiang River dry valley is a typical arid ecosystem with low rainfall (400–700 mm), high evaporation rate (1400 mm), high temperature and a strong Foehn effect (Yang et al. 2020). Vegetation development in this region is hindered by heightened RFC-induced water deficits caused by abundant RFs throughout soil profiles (Li et al. 2008, Wu et al. 2008, Xu et al. 2008).
In February 2018, a completely randomized block experiment was conducted at the study site. The experiment comprising 12 treatment combinations involving four RFC levels (0, 25, 50 and 75% volumetric contents, ν ν−1) paired with three species. Each treatment included five replicates, resulting in a total of 60 plots. The RFC setting was based on a previous investigation in an arid valley (Bao et al. 2012), where RFC ranges from 1 to 65% (ν ν−1). Each plot was represented by a pit measuring 1 m in length, 1 m in width and 0.5 m in depth, with a distance of 0.5 m between adjacent plots (Figure S1 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online). Schist was chosen as the designated RF for this study because of its prevalence in the region. RFs were extracted from the pit material, along with additional local deposits, to ensure an adequate supply. Rocks were crushed into fragments of 1–2 cm in diameter. Twelve samples were used to determine the porosity (Vrock), density (drock) and available water content (AWC). The Vrock was measured using the water displacement method (Hughes 2005). To obtain the AWC, sequential measurements of Ψrock and corresponding weight were taken during controlled dehydration. After each dehydration step, samples were sealed in the sample holder for 1 h before Ψrock was measured. Experiments were stopped at Ψrock ≤ −5 MPa and samples were oven dried at 70 °C for 72 h to obtain dry weight (DW). The AWC for plant uptake was calculated as the difference between rock water content values at −0.2 and −1.5 MPa (Nardini et al. 2021). The resulting drock was 2.56 ± 0.03 g cm−3, Vrock was 1.45 ± 0.38% and AWC averaged 6 mg g−1 (Hu et al. 2021). To achieve the experimental design, soils in each plot were excavated, sieved through a 2-mm mesh and mixed uniformly with RFs (1–2 cm in diameter). The mixture was then reintroduced into each plot, and polyethylene film was affixed to the plot walls to prevent external disturbances. It is worth noting that the plot bottoms were left unlined to facilitate natural drainage. The entire experimental setup procedure was concluded by April 2018. In August 2022, we selected 52-month-old plants of each species with a height of 1.5–1.8 m and an average canopy size of 0.9–1.2 m to investigate the lasting effects of RFC on leaf hydraulic-related traits. Please refer to Figure S2, available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online, for further information on the study’s timeline.
Leaf water potential
In August 2022, we measured the predawn and midday leaf water potentials (Ψleaf) of five fully expanded leaves from five individuals of each species at each RFC level using a pressure chamber (Model 3115 Portable Field Plant Water Console, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The measurements were taken on a sunny day at 04:00–06:00 h and 12:00–14:00 h, respectively (22 August 2022). To prevent water loss in transpiring samples, we followed the precautions described by Turner (1988). Briefly, leaves were collected and immediately placed in a sealable bag that had been previously flushed with air to ensure 100% humidity. After 30 min of equilibration, Ψleaf was measured according to the method described by Yang et al. (2021).
Pressure–volume curve traits
To determine the P–V curve traits, we randomly selected five leafy branches from five individuals for each RFC level within each species (one individual per plot). The branches were cut in deionized water to prevent air entry. Subsequently, the leaves were recut underwater and left to rehydrate overnight. After complete rehydration, leaf area (Aleaf) was determined using a leaf area meter (Li3100C; Lincoln, NE, USA), and then the initial Ψleaf was measured by a pressure chamber (Model 3115 Portable Field Plant Water Console, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The experiments started once the leaf water potential (Ψleaf) reached a value of ≥−0.2 MPa. Following the first Ψleaf measurement, leaves were weighed on a digital balance (with a precision of 10−4 g). After losing 2–5 mg of water, Ψleaf was remeasured and the process was repeated until a strictly linear relationship between 1/Ψleaf and water loss at four or five successive points. The leaves were then dried in an oven at 70 °C for 48 h to determine their DW. The P–V curves, turgor loss point (Ψtlp), modulus of elasticity (ɛ) and related parameters were calculated using an Excel sheet developed by Sack and Pasquet-Kok (2011). The osmotic potential of the leaf at full turgor (π0) was estimated by calculating the negative value of the y-intercept of the linear regression of the P–V curve under the Ψtlp. The bulk leaf capacitance before turgor loss (Cleaf) was calculated from P–V curves based on the slope of the relationship between Ψleaf and water loss, and normalized by Aleaf and DW.
Leaf hydraulic conductance
The hydraulic conductance of the entire leaf, including xylem conduits and mesophyll components, was measured using the rehydration technique outlined by Brodribb and Holbrook (2003). A total of 600 branches were collected (10 branches × 5 individuals × 3 species × 4 RFC levels) at predawn. The branches were enclosed in black plastic bags and quickly transported to the laboratory. The branches were then dehydrated through bench drying, resulting in a range of leaf water potential values (−0.2 to −4.0 MPa). After a minimum of 0.5 h of dark treatment to ensure stomatal closure and leaf water potential equilibration, we selected two leaves from each branch to measure the initial leaf water potential (Ψ0, MPa) using a pressure chamber. The adjacent leaves were then cut underwater and rehydrated for specific durations (t, 30–300 s). Following this, the leaves were extracted and dried to determine the leaf water potential (Ψf, MPa) after hydration.
Following rehydration, the leaves were removed and dried to measure the leaf water potential (Ψf, MPa). Kleaf was then calculated using the following formula:
![]() |
where Cleaf represents the bulk leaf capacitance before turgor loss, Ψ0 represents the initial leaf water potential and Ψf corresponds to the water potential of the rehydrated leaf. In this study, the maximum Kleaf was calculated as the mean value obtained from well-hydrated leaves (Ψ0 > −0.5 MPa). This value was used to calculate area-based (Karea) and mass-based (Kmass) measurements according to Carea and Cmass, respectively. However, it is important to note that this estimation method has limitations. This is because in some species, leaf tissue is hydraulically compartmentalized, and only a portion of the total leaf water is well-connected to the transpiration stream. This can be reflected by the dynamic capacitance, but not by the Cleaf (Blackman and Brodribb 2011). To determine the leaf water potential at 12, 50 and 88% loss of hydraulic conductance (P12, P50, P88), leaf vulnerability curves were fitted for each species at varying RFC levels using a Weibull model (Ogle et al. 2009) and the ‘fitcond’ function of the ‘fitplc’ package (Duursma and Choat 2017) in the R Statistical Programming environment.
Leaf mass per area and leaf vein length measurements
The leaves used to establish the P–V curve were also used to calculate the LMA, which is determined by the ratio of DW to Aleaf. Vein length per leaf area (VLA) was measured following the methodology outlined by Scoffoni et al. (2014). Specifically, for each individual, three leaves were chemically bleached in 5% NaOH and then strained with safranin and fast green. The leaf vein system characteristics were assessing using an image processing system. The system consisted of a microscope (Olympus BX53F, Japan), a camera (Toupcam, Hangzhou ToupTek Photonics Co., Ltd, China) and a computer equipped with analysis software (ToupView, Hangzhou ToupTek Photonics Co., Ltd). The leaf vein images were analyzed using WinRhizo 2020 (Regent Instrument, Canada). The length of the leaf veins was divided into major vein length (VLAmajor), which includes the first- to third-order leaf veins, and minor vein length (VLAminor), which includes veins higher than third order. VLAmajor and VLAminor were calculated as the vein length per unit area. The total VLA was calculated as the sum of VLAmajor and VLAminor. Figure S3, available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online, presents the leaf vein systems for the three species with different RFC.
Measurement of SWC
Soil water content (SWC) was measured using neutron probes (CNC503DR) at 10 cm intervals within the soil profile from 0 to 50 cm. For a detailed procedure, refer to Hu et al. (2021). In brief, SWC measurements were conducted every 3 days from July to September 2018, followed by weekly measurements from October 2018 to March 2019. The data collected in 2021 were used to investigate the changes in SWC across soil profiles under different RFC conditions, as shown in Figure S4 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online.
Statistical analysis
To examine variations in leaf traits among different RFC levels, one-way ANOVA analysis was conducted. Multiple comparisons were carried out using the least significant difference (LSD) test with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. Regression analysis was performed using mean values to investigate correlations between parameters. Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the coordination and trade-off relationships between efficiency (Kleaf), P–V traits, safety (P12, P50 and P88) and structural variables (LMA, VLA). The ‘corrplot’ package in R (Wei and Simko 2021) was utilized for this purpose. Partial least squares path model (PLS-PM) was implemented to examine the direct and indirect effects of rock fragments (RFC), LMA, P–V traits (characterized by Ψtlp), leaf vein traits (characterized by VLA, VLAmajor, VLAminor) and Kleaf (characterized by Karea) on leaf hydraulic safety (characterized by P50). The model’s goodness-of-fit (GOF) index, which should exceed 0.7 for reliable results, was used for evaluation. The PLS-PM model was constructed using the R package ‘plspm’ (v 0.5.0) (Gaston et al. 2023).
Results
Response of leaf traits to increased RFC
The predawn and midday Ψleaf values of the three species consistently decreased as RFC increased (Figure 1). Predawn Ψleaf ranged from −0.54 MPa in 0% RFC to −1.62 MPa in 75% RFC (Figure 1a), whereas midday Ψleaf values were even more negative, ranging from −1.22 MPa in 0% RFC to −2.81 MPa in 75% RFC (Figure 1b).
Figure 1.

Response of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) to RFC in three xerophytic species. (a) Predawn Ψleaf, (b) midday Ψleaf. Mean ± SE (n = 5). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (LSD test, P < 0.05) among RFC treatments.
The leaf structural traits of the three species showed significant changes in response to variations in RFC, except for Aleaf (Table 1). Leaf mass per area, VLA and VLAmajor consistently increased from 0 to 75% RFC across all three species. In the case of VLAminor, S. davidii showed an increasing trend, whereas no clear trend was observed for C. szechuanensis and B. brachycarpa (Table 1). However, Aleaf did not exhibit a distinct trend in response to RFC among the three species. Moreover, significant interspecific differences were observed in all structural traits (P < 0.05; Table 1).
Table 1.
Effects of RFC and species on leaf area (Aleaf), LMA, leaf VLA, major vein length per leaf area (VLAmajor) and minor vein length per leaf area (VLAminor). Mean ± SE (n = 5).
|
Table 2 shows that for all three species, there was a clear increase in Carea, Cmass and ε, whereas π0 and Ψtlp became more negative with increasing RFC in relation to P–V curve parameters. Significant interspecific differences were observed in P–V traits, except for Ψtlp (Table 2). Figure 2 illustrates that leaf hydraulic conductance, as measured by Karea and Kmass, was higher in soil with low RFC and decreased continuously as RFC increased. Interspecific differences were significant in Karea and Kmass (Figure 2).
Table 2.
Effects of RFC and species on leaf capacitance area based (Carea) and mass based (Cmass), modulus of elasticity (ɛ), osmotic potential at full turgor (π0) and at turgor loss point (Ψtlp). Mean ± SE (n = 5).
|
Figure 2.

Maximum leaf hydraulic conductance on a leaf area (Karea) (a) and leaf dry mass (Kmass) (b) basis, as measured in three species varied with soil RFC. Mean ± SE (n = 5). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (LSD test, P < 0.05) among RFC treatments.
To assess the vulnerability of the leaf hydraulic system, vulnerability curves were constructed for the three species, showing Karea decline in relation to leaf water potential (Figure 3). Under high RFC conditions, all species displayed greater resistance to embolism compared with lower RFC conditions, with more negative values of P12, P50 and P88 observed in high RFC conditions.
Figure 3.
Changes of leaf hydraulic conductance on a leaf area basis (Karea) as a function of leaf water potential (Ψleaf) in S. davidii (a–d), C. szechuanensis (e–h) and B. brachycarpa (i–l), varied with soil RFC. Dotted lines, respectively, indicate the Ψleaf values inducing 12% (P12), 50% (P50) and 88% (P88) of Karea decline.
Trait correlations
The positive correlation between Ψtlp and P50 was observed across all three species (Figure 4). Further analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of LMA and VLA on Karea, Ψtlp and P50, revealing strong influences of LMA and VLA on these parameters (Figure 5). Specifically, Ψtlp and P50 showed positive correlations with LMA and VLA (Figure 5a, b, d and e), whereas Karea displayed negative correlations with both LMA and VLA (Figure 5e and f).
Figure 4.
Relationships between: leaf water potential inducing 50% loss of leaf hydraulic conductance (P50) and maximum leaf hydraulic conductance on area (Karea) (a) and mass basis (Kmass) (b); turgor loss point (Ψtlp) and maximum Karea (c), maximum Kmass (d). Lines were fitted using a linear model and reported together with r2 and P values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5.
Relationships between LMA and leaf water potential inducing 50% loss of leaf hydraulic conductance (P50) (a), turgor loss point (Ψtlp) (b) and maximum leaf hydraulic conductance (Karea) (c), as well as relationships with VLA and P50 (d), Ψtlp (e), Karea (f).
Figure 6 shows the correlation analysis of hydraulic-related traits, which revealed some species-specific differences. Across all three species, Kleaf had significant negative relationships with P–V traits and leaf safety (Figure 6), respectively. Additionally, P–V traits showed a significant positive correlation with leaf safety. In the case of S. davidii, all leaf structural traits showed strong correlations with Kleaf, P–V traits and leaf safety (Figure 6a). However, for C. szechuanensis, neither Aleaf nor VLAminor showed significant relationships with other traits (Figure 6b). Similarly, for B. brachycarpa, only VLAminor did not display significant correlations with the other traits (Figure 6c).
Figure 6.
Spearman correlation coefficients between leaf hydraulic-related traits on S. davidii (a), C. szechuanensis (b) and B. brachycarpa (c). Karea: maximum area-based leaf hydraulic conductance; Kmass: maximum mass-based leaf hydraulic conductance; π0 (−MPa): leaf osmotic potential at full turgor; Ψtlp (−MPa): turgor loss point; Carea: area-based bulk leaf capacitance before turgor loss; Cmass: mass-based bulk leaf capacitance before turgor loss; ɛ: modulus of elasticity; P12: Ψleaf values inducing 12% loss of leaf hydraulic conductance; P50: Ψleaf values inducing 50% loss of leaf hydraulic conductance; P88: Ψleaf values inducing 88% loss of leaf hydraulic conductance; Aleaf: leaf area; VLA: total leaf vein density; VLAmajor: major leaf vein density; VLAminor: minor leaf vein density. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Response mechanism of leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety to increasing RFC
The PLS-PM analysis showed the direct and indirect effects of RFC, LMA, P–V traits and VLA on Kleaf and leaf hydraulic safety (GOF > 0.7) (Figure 7). The results indicate that leaf hydraulic safety was significantly associated with VLA and Ψtlp (Figure 7). Additionally, LMA was found to have a negative impact on Kleaf across the three species (Figure 7). In S. davidii, Kleaf was significantly influenced by VLA and Ψtlp (Figure 7a), whereas in C. szechuanensis and B. brachycarpa, only Ψtlp had a positive effect on Kleaf (Figure 7b and c).
Figure 7.
The PLS-PM describing the direct and indirect effects on leaf hydraulic efficiency (Kleaf) and safety in S. davidii (a), C. szechuanensis (b) and B. brachycarpa (c). Solid line and dotted line indicated the relationships are significant (P < 0.05) and insignificant (P > 0.05), respectively. Numbers adjacent to the arrows are standardized path coefficients. The proportion of variance explained (R2) appears in each response variable in the model.
Discussion
Response of leaf hydraulic traits to increasing RFC
Predawn and midday Ψleaf variations can indicate plant responses to changes in SWC (Williams and Araujo 2002). Recent research (Huang et al. 2023) has shown that the RFs used in this study could potentially provide some water to plants. In our investigation, however, both predawn Ψleaf and midday Ψleaf showed significant declines as RFC increased (Figure 1). This suggests indicating that soils with higher RFC have a lower water holding capacity (Figure S4, available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online), resulting in limited SWA for plants grown under high RFC conditions (Hu et al. 2021, Huang et al. 2022).
Leaf hydraulic safety (P50) and hydraulic efficiency (Kleaf) are recognized as key physiological traits for plant acclimation to diverse SWA conditions (Nardini and Luglio 2014, Scoffoni et al. 2017). In this study, we extended the assessment of P50 and Kleaf to leaves of three xerophytic species in response to increasing RFC. We observed a consistent intraspecific trend across all three species, where P50 became more negative (Figure 3) and Kleaf decreased gradually (Figure 2) (H1), which indicating that the xerophytic species improve their drought tolerance by sacrificed hydraulic transport capacity. This finding demonstrates the impressive adaptability of Kleaf and P50 in xerophytic species to increasing RFC, which is in contrast to recent research indicating that site water availability had low influence on P50 in Fagus sylvatica L. at stem level (Weithmann et al. 2022). Unfortunately, in this study, the Kleaf value was calculated using leaf bulk capacitance instead of dynamic capacitance. This may lead to bias because of the potential hydraulic compartmentalization in the leaf tissue (Blackman and Brodribb 2011). This is an important limitation of our study and implies that our results cannot be compared directly with the data measured by other standard methods (Scoffoni et al. 2012, Hernandez-Santana et al. 2016).
Pressure–volume traits have been increasingly used as functional indicators of drought tolerance (Sack et al. 2003, Bartlett et al. 2012, 2014). Ecologically, Ψtlp is known to be strongly correlated with SWA (Bartlett et al. 2012), and species from drier habitats usually exhibit lower Ψtlp values (Lenz et al. 2006, Merchant et al. 2007, Mitchell and O’Grady 2015). This study found that there was a significant RFC-dependent plasticity across the three species. Specifically, π0 and Ψtlp became more negative, whereas Cleaf and ε gradually increased (Table 2). Overall, from an intraspecific variation perspective, the hydraulic traits of all three xerophytic species adjusted to improve drought tolerance under increasing RFC. To date, the intraspecific variability of leaf hydraulic-related traits in response to environmental variation is still not well understood (Pritzkow et al. 2020). Despite the application of different measurement principles to estimate leaf hydraulics relative to standard approaches (Blackman and Brodribb 2011, Scoffoni et al. 2012), and the corresponding methodological limitations, to our knowledge, this is the first experimental exploration into how intraspecific variation in Kleaf and P50 of xerophytic species reacts to varying RFC. Therefore, in comparison with earlier studies involving multiple species, our findings serve to elucidate the drought acclimation strategies of xerophytic species to increasing RFC. Moreover, they contribute to a deeper understanding of the correlations between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in rocky environments.
Clear efficiency–safety trade-off with RFC in xerophytic species
Correlations between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety can lead to different or even contrasting conclusions when examined across multiple species, closely related species and within single species. These conclusions may present negative, null or even positive relationships (Nardini et al. 2014, Pritzkow et al. 2020, Yao et al. 2021a, 2021b). In addition, these relationships are affected by climate, site-specific water availability and species variability (Scoffoni et al. 2017, Pritzkow et al. 2020). In this study, we extended the correlation between hydraulic efficiency and safety to leaves of xerophytic species responding to increased RFC. It is worth noting that there is a significant interspecific difference in Kleaf and P50 (Figures 2 and 3). However, the trade-off between hydraulic efficiency and safety in response to increasing RFC displayed remarkable similarity across the three xerophytic species (Figures 4 and 6). Therefore, a pronounced and consistent trade-off between hydraulic efficiency and safety emerged across xerophytic species in response to increasing RFC (Figure 4). The improved leaf safety of xerophytic species in coping with high RFC conditions comes at the cost of hydraulic efficiency. On the other hand, this trade-off appears to be an important element in shaping the distribution of xerophytic species (Engelbrecht et al. 2007, Nardini et al. 2012). Specifically, xerophytic species from the same habitats tend to adopt similar hydraulic acclimation processes to cope with environmental water stress, regardless of their unique ecological traits.
Drivers of the trade-off between hydraulic safety and efficiency in xerophytic species
In adapting to increasing RFC, while our evidence supports a clear trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in xerophytic species adjusting to increasing RFC, the drivers behind the observed variation in these traits appears to differ among species (Figure 7). As hypothesized, the similarity in LMA and VLAmajor response patterns, but disparity in Aleaf and VLAminor (Table 1) suggest that changes in leaf structure may be the drivers in establishing the correlations between leaf hydraulics and safety (Nardini 2022).
In this study, Aleaf decreased slightly with increasing RFC for S. davidii and B. brachycarpa, but LMA and VLAmajor increased gradually from 0 to 75% RFC across three species (Table 1). These changes are consistent with the trend toward smaller and tougher (high LMA) leaves that are typically found in drier and nutrient-limited sites (Poorter et al. 2009, Nardini et al. 2014). The relationship between VLAmajor and P50 was negative across the three species (Figure 6). This finding is consistent with previous studies, which suggested that an abundance of major veins can facilitate alternative water pathways in situations where some veins are partially blocked by embolism. This mechanism helps to mitigate the adverse effects of drought on leaf vein hydraulic conductance (Kx) (Nardini et al. 2003b, Scoffoni et al. 2011). Interestingly, our study revealed a positive correlation between VLAminor and P50 in S. davidii (Figure 6a), highlighting the significant role of the minor vein system in shaping leaf hydraulic safety. This observation could explain why S. davidii is more drought tolerant than the other two species (Figure 3). Furthermore, a negative correlation between leaf area and VLAmajor was observed in S. davidii and B. brachycarpa (Figure 6a and c), resulting in increased LMA values (Blonder et al. 2011, Nardini et al. 2012). Our study also demonstrates this indirect impact of LMA on leaf hydraulic safety (Figure 7) (Nardini 2022). In summary, RFC significantly influences LMA and leaf vein systems, which, in turn, regulate the trade-off dynamics between hydraulic safety and efficiency in xerophytic species (Figure 7).
Leaf hydraulic safety is closely related to outside-xylem tissue traits such as Ψtlp. Therefore, the variation in P–V traits can also determine the trade-off relationship between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety (Scoffoni et al. 2014, Trifilò et al. 2016, Abate et al. 2021). In addition, Brodribb et al. (2016) observed a decline of 50–66% in Kleaf as Ψleaf approached Ψtlp. Similar results were observed in Arabidopsis thaliana (Scoffoni et al. 2018), eight species with different life forms (Scoffoni et al. 2017) and Caragana species (Yao et al. 2021a). These results suggest that there is a trade-off between leaf safety and hydraulic efficiency, which can also be regulated by P–V traits. In the present study, a more negative Ψtlp resulted in a more negative P50 in high RFC conditions (Figure 7). More negative Ψtlp could provide wider range of midday Ψleaf at which the leaf maintains basic function and remain turgid (Bartlett et al. 2012, Yao et al. 2021b). Additionally, our study revealed a significant intraspecific variation of Ψtlp, for instance with B. brachycarpa approaching 2 MPa (Table 2). Across all three species, we found that Ψtlp was closely related to π0 and ε (Figure 6), which is consistent with previous studies indicating that differences in Ψtlp are primarily driven by parallel variation in π0 and partially by modifications of ε (Bartlett et al. 2012, Turner 2017). The mechanistic link between Ψtlp and π0 has been well understood (Turner 2017); the negative relationships between ε and Ψtlp might reflect coordination between P–V traits, suggesting that when fully hydrated, cells with low π0 develop high turgor pressure, possibly requiring mechanical reinforcement of cell walls (Mitchell et al. 2008, Savi et al. 2017).
Additionally, it is worth noting that LMA had a significant impact on Kleaf in all three species (Figure 7), suggesting that the trade-off between hydraulic efficiency and safety is also regulated by LMA (Nardini 2022). Unfortunately, our current study did not measure additional mesophyll anatomical parameters, such as mesophyll cell layers, cell wall thickness and mesophyll cell size (John et al. 2013), or specific LMA constituents, such as leaf density and thickness (Nadal et al. 2023). This limits our capacity to further clarify the regulatory mechanism of the trade-off between leaf efficiency and safety in xerophytic species. In addition, in terms of the experimental design, it is important to consider that the bottom of the pits was not lined with plastic film. This allowed plant roots to grow below the rock layer, which could have interfered with our conclusions. However, based on the monitoring of fine-root tissue density and biomass accumulation fraction vertical distribution (0–70 cm) (Figure S5 available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online), it is believed that these plants were still limited after 4 years because of the presence of RFs in the top 0.5 m of soil the profile. However, it is important to exercise caution when drawing conclusions about the relationship between VLA and Kleaf (Figures 6 and 7), as Kleaf in this study represents the entire leaves rather than being divided into Kx and Kox. Therefore, to further clarify the underlying reasons for this trade-off relationship, future studies should focus on a wider range of leaf anatomical and structural traits, as well as more detailed Kleaf parameters (Buckley et al. 2015, Sonawane et al. 2021).
Conclusions
The study revealed notable variations in leaf hydraulic traits across three xerophytic species as RFC increased. A clear trade-off was found between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety as RFC increased for these species. This trade-off likely results from changes in both the xylem and the outside-xylem hydraulic pathways. These findings highlight the important role of the trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in the acclimation of xerophytic species to drought stress, particularly in highly rocky soils. Importantly, our findings highlight the role of leaf vein traits and P–V traits in determining the dynamic trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in xerophytic species. This has valuable implications for studying intraspecific variability in hydraulic traits, while also emphasizing the influence of localized soil rock conditions in elucidating the geographic distribution patterns of these species. Future studies on plant acclimation and their responses to climate change should consider RFC variations more thoroughly.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Deborah Traselin Nkrumah for providing expert advice in English writing and to Lulu Xie who provided valuable comments on the manuscript. These comments all helped improve the manuscript. We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Xiulong Zhang, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9 Section 4 South Renmin Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Shaowei Ma, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9 Section 4 South Renmin Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China.
Hui Hu, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9 Section 4 South Renmin Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China.
Fanglan Li, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9 Section 4 South Renmin Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Weikai Bao, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9 Section 4 South Renmin Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China.
Long Huang, CAS Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization & Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 9 Section 4 South Renmin Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 19A Yuquan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32271654).
Authors’ contributions
X.Z., W.B. and F.L. conceived the study and charted the experimental plan. X.Z., S.M., H.H. and L.H. performed the experiments. X.Z., S.M., H.H. and L.H. carried out the field experiment and performed most of the trait measurements. X.Z. provided statistical analysis. X.Z., W.B. and F.L. interpreted the data. X.Z. wrote the manuscript with the help of all authors.
Data availability statement
All study data are included in the article and/or Supplementary data, and all raw data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- Abate E, Nardini A, Petruzzellis F, Trifilò P (2021) Too dry to survive: leaf hydraulic failure in two salvia species can be predicted on the basis of water content. Plant Physiol Biochem 166:215–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baetens JM, Verbist K, Cornelis WM, Gabriëls D, Soto G (2009) On the influence of coarse fragments on soil water retention. Water Resour Res 45:W07408. 10.1029/2008WR007402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bao WK, Pang XY, Li FL, Zhou ZQ (2012) A study of ecological restoration and sustainable management of the Arid Minjiang, River Valley, China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2012) The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 15:393–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartlett MK, Zhang Y, Kreidler N, Sun S, Ardy R, Cao K, Sack L (2014) Global analysis of plasticity in turgor loss point, a key drought tolerance trait. Ecol Lett 17:1580–1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blackman CJ, Brodribb TJ (2011) Two measures of leaf capacitance: insights into the water transport pathway and hydraulic conductance in leaves. Funct Plant Biol 38:118–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blackman CJ, Brodribb TJ, Jordan GJ (2010) Leaf hydraulic vulnerability is related to conduit dimensions and drought resistance across a diverse range of woody angiosperms. New Phytol 188:1113–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blonder B, Violle C, Bentley LP, Enquist BJ (2011) Venation networks and the origin of the leaf economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 14:91–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiol 132:2166–2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brodribb TJ, Bienaimé D, Marmottant P (2016) Revealing catastrophic failure of leaf networks under stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4865–4869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brodribb TJ, Powers J, Cochard H, Choat B (2020) Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought. Science 368:261–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buckley TN, John GP, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2015) How does leaf anatomy influence water transport outside the xylem? Plant Physiol 168:1616–1635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canny M, Wong SC, Huang C, Miller C (2011) Differential shrinkage of mesophyll cells in transpiring cotton leaves: implications for static and dynamic pools of water, and for water transport pathways. Funct Plant Biol 39:91–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choat B, Jansen S, Brodribb TJ et al. (2012) Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature 491:752–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duursma RA, Choat B (2017) Fitplc: an R package to fit hydraulic vulnerability curves. J Plant Hydraul 4:e002. 10.20870/jph.2017.e002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Engelbrecht BM, Comita LS, Condit R, Kursar TA, Tyree MT, Turner BL, Hubbell SP (2007) Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests. Nature 447:80–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FAO-UNESCO (1988) Soil map of the world, revised legend: world resources report. FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
- Farrell C, Szota C, Arndt SK (2017) Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants? Plant Cell Environ 40:1500–1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gascó A, Nardini A, Salleo S (2004) Resistance to water flow through leaves of Coffea arabica is dominated by extra-vascular tissues. Funct Plant Biol 31:1161–1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gaston S, Laura T, Giorgio R (2023) Plspm: partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM). R package version 0.5.0. Berkeley: Trowchez Editions, 383:551. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=plspm.
- Gleason SM, Westoby M, Jansen S et al. (2016) Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species. New Phytol 209:123–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gortan E, Nardini A, Gascó A, Salleo S (2009) The hydraulic conductance of Fraxinus ornus leaves is constrained by soil water availability and coordinated with gas exchange rates. Tree Physiol 29:529–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez-Santana V, Rodriguez-Dominguez CM, Fernández JE, Diaz-Espejo A (2016) Role of leaf hydraulic conductance in the regulation of stomatal conductance in almond and olive in response to water stress. Tree Physiol 36:725–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu H, Li FL, McCormack ML, Huang L, Bao WK (2021) Functionally divergent growth, biomass allocation and root distribution of two xerophytic species in response to varying soil rock fragment content. Plant Soil 463:265–277. [Google Scholar]
- Huang L, Hu H, Bao WK, Hu B, Liu J, Li FL (2022) Shifting soil nutrient stoichiometry with soil of variable rock fragment contents and different vegetation types. Catena 220:106717. 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang L, Bao WK, Hu H, Nkrumah DT, Li FL (2023) Rock fragment content alters spatiotemporal patterns of soil water content and temperature: evidence from a field experiment. Geoderma 438:116613. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes SW (2005) Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects. Phys Educ 40:468–474. [Google Scholar]
- John GP, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2013) Allometry of cells and tissues within leaves. Am J Bot 100:1936–1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- John GP, Scoffoni C, Buckley TN, Villar R, Poorter H, Sack L (2017) The anatomical and compositional basis of leaf mass per area. Ecol Lett 20:412–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson DM, Woodruff DR, McCulloh KA, Meinzer FC (2009) Leaf hydraulic conductance, measured in situ, declines and recovers daily: leaf hydraulics, water potential and stomatal conductance in four temperate and three tropical tree species. Tree Physiol 29:879–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korboulewsky N, Tétégan M, Samouelian A, Cousin I (2020) Plants use water in the pores of rock fragments during drought. Plant Soil 454:35–47. [Google Scholar]
- Lai X, Zhu Q, Zhou Z, Liao K (2018) Rock fragment and spatial variation of soil hydraulic parameters are necessary on soil water simulation on the stony-soil hillslope. J Hydrol 565:354–364. [Google Scholar]
- Lenz TI, Wright IJ, Westoby M (2006) Interrelations among pressure–volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Plant Physiol 127:423–433. [Google Scholar]
- Li FL, Bao WK, Wu N (2008) Leaf characteristics and their relationship of (Cotinus szechuanensis) in arid river valley located in the upper reaches of Minjiang River with environmental factors depending on its altitude gradients. Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica 25:2277–2284. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Li FL, Bao WK, Wu N (2009) Effects of water stress on growth, dry matter allocation and water-use efficiency of a leguminous species, Sophora davidii. Agrofor Syst 77:193–201. [Google Scholar]
- Li FL, Bao WK, Zhu LH (2010) Species diversity and spatial distribution of legumes in the dry valley of Minjiang River, SW China. J Mt Sci 28:76–84 (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Li MY, Fang LD, Duan CY, Cao Y, Yin H, Ning QR, Hao GY (2020) Greater risk of hydraulic failure due to increased drought threatens pine plantations in Horqin Sandy land of northern China. For Ecol Manage 461:117980. 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117980. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu YY, Wang AY, An YN, Lian PY, Wu DD, Zhu JJ, Meinzer FC, Hao GY (2018) Hydraulics play an important role in causing low growth rate and dieback of aging Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica trees in plantations of Northeast China. Plant Cell Environ 41:1500–1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Louis SS, De Guzman ME, Baraloto C et al. (2018) Coordination and trade-offs among hydraulic safety, efficiency and drought avoidance traits in Amazonian rainforest canopy tree species. New Phytol 218:1015–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma D, Shao M, Zhang J, Wang Q (2010) Validation of an analytical method for determining soil hydraulic properties of stony soils using experimental data. Geoderma 159:262–269. [Google Scholar]
- Maréchaux I, Bartlett MK, Sack L, Baraloto C, Engel J, Joetzjer E, Chave J (2015) Drought tolerance as predicted by leaf water potential at turgor loss point varies strongly across species within an Amazonian forest. Funct Ecol 29:1268–1277. [Google Scholar]
- Matzner SL, Rice KJ, Richards JH (2001) Intra-specific variation in xylem cavitation in interior live oak (Quercus wislizenii A. DC). J Exp Bot 52:783–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mauri R, Cardoso AA, da SilvaMM, Oliveira LA, Avila RT, Martins SC, DaMatta FM (2020) Leaf hydraulic properties are decoupled from leaf area across coffee species. Trees 34:1507–1514. [Google Scholar]
- Merchant A, Callister A, Arndt S, Tausz M, Adams M (2007) Contrasting physiological responses of six eucalyptus species to water deficit. Ann Bot 100:1507–1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mi M, Shao MA, Liu B (2016) Effect of rock fragments content on water consumption, biomass and water-use efficiency of plants under different water conditions. Ecol Eng 94:574–582. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP (2015) Adaptation of leaf water relations to climatic and habitat water availability. Forests 6:2281–2295. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell PJ, Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Burgess SO (2008) Leaf water relations during summer water deficit: differential responses in turgor maintenance and variation in leaf structure among different plant communities in South-Western Australia. Plant Cell Environ 31:1791–1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nadal M, Clemente-Moreno MJ, Perera-Castro AV, Roig-Oliver M, Onoda Y, Gulías J, Flexas J (2023) Incorporating pressure–volume traits into the leaf economics spectrum. Ecol Lett 26:549–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A (2022) Hard and tough: the coordination between leaf mechanical resistance and drought tolerance. Flora 288:152023. 10.1016/j.flora.2022.152023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Luglio J (2014) Leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: possible trade-offs and correlations with climate across three major biomes. Funct Ecol 28:810–818. [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Tyree MT, Salleo S (2001) Xylem cavitation in the leaf of Prunus laurocerasus and its impact on leaf hydraulics. Plant Physiol 125:1700–1709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Salleo S, Raimondo F (2003a) Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance correlate with leaf vein embolism in Cercis siliquastrum L. Trees 17:529–534. [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Salleo S, Trifilò P, Gullo MAL (2003b) Water relations and hydraulic characteristics of three woody species co-occurring in the same habitat. Ann For Sci 60:297–305. [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Ramani M, Gortan E, Salleo S (2008) Vein recovery from embolism occurs under negative pressure in leaves of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Physiol Plant 133:755–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Gullo MAL, Salleo S (2011) Refilling embolized xylem conduits: is it a matter of phloem unloading? Plant Sci 180:604–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Pedà G, La Rocca N (2012) Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho-anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences. New Phytol 196:788–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Õunapuu-Pikas E, Savi T (2014) When smaller is better: leaf hydraulic conductance and drought vulnerability correlate to leaf size and venation density across four Coffea arabica genotypes. Funct Plant Biol 41:972–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nardini A, Petruzzellis F, Marusig D et al. (2021) Water ‘on the rocks’: a summer drink for thirsty trees? New Phytol 229:199–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novák V, Kňava K, Šimůnek J (2011) Determining the influence of stones on hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils using numerical method. Geoderma 161:177–181. [Google Scholar]
- Nyssen J, Poesen J, Moeyersons J, Lavrysen E, Haile M, Deckers J (2002) Spatial distribution of rock fragments in cultivated soils in northern Ethiopia as affected by lateral and vertical displacement processes. Geomorphology 43:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Prasad PV (2016) A safety vs efficiency trade-off identified in the hydraulic pathway of grass leaves is decoupled from photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and precipitation. New Phytol 210:97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogle K, Barber JJ, Willson C, Thompson B (2009) Hierarchical statistical modeling of xylem vulnerability to cavitation. New Phytol 182:541–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petruzzellis F, Tordoni E, Tomasella M, Savi T, Tonet V, Palandrani C, Castello M, Nardini A, Bacaro G (2021) Functional differentiation of invasive and native plants along a leaf efficiency/safety trade-off. Environ Exp Bot 188:104518. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Poesen J, Lavee H (1994) Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes. Catena 23:1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol 182:565–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Preisler Y, Tatarinov F, Grünzweig JM et al. (2019) Mortality versus survival in drought-affected Aleppo pine forest depends on the extent of rock cover and soil stoniness. Funct Ecol 33:901–912. [Google Scholar]
- Pritzkow C, Williamson V, Szota C, Trouvé R, Arndt SK (2020) Phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptation of functional traits influences intra-specific variation in hydraulic efficiency and safety. Tree Physiol 40:215–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sack L, Pasquet-Kok J (2011) Prometheus Wiki contributors. Leaf pressure–volume curve parameters. Prometheus Wiki. https://prometheusprotocols.net/function/water-relations/pressure-volume-curves/leaf-pressure-volume-curve-parameters/ (accessed on 15 March 2023). [Google Scholar]
- Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM (2003) The ‘hydrology’ of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ 26:1343–1356. [Google Scholar]
- Savi T, Love VL, Dal Borgo A, Martellos S, Nardini A (2017) Morpho-anatomical and physiological traits in saplings of drought-tolerant Mediterranean woody species. Trees 31:1137–1148. [Google Scholar]
- Schwinning S (2010) The ecohydrology of roots in rocks. Ecohydrology 3:238–245. [Google Scholar]
- Schwinning S (2020) A critical question for the critical zone: how do plants use rock water? Plant Soil 454:49–56. [Google Scholar]
- Scoffoni C, Sack L (2017) The causes and consequences of leaf hydraulic decline with dehydration. J Exp Bot 68:4479–4496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scoffoni C, Rawls M, McKown A, Cochard H, Sack L (2011) Decline of leaf hydraulic conductance with dehydration: relationship to leaf size and venation architecture. Plant Physiol 156:832–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scoffoni C, AD MK, Rawls M, Sack L (2012) Dynamics of leaf hydraulic conductance with water status: quantification and analysis of species differences under steady state. J Exp Bot 63:643–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scoffoni C, Vuong C, Diep S, Cochard H, Sack L (2014) Leaf shrinkage with dehydration: coordination with hydraulic vulnerability and drought tolerance. Plant Physiol 164:1772–1788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scoffoni C, Albuquerque C, Brodersen CR, Townes SV, John GP, Bartlett MK, Buckley TN, McElrone AJ, Sack L (2017) Outside-xylem vulnerability, not xylem embolism, controls leaf hydraulic decline during dehydration. Plant Physiol 173:1197–1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scoffoni C, Albuquerque C, Fletcher LR et al. (2018) Control of gas-exchange by leaf outside-xylem hydraulic conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 178:1584–1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skelton RP, Anderegg LD, Papper P, Reich E, Dawson TE, Kling M, Thompson SE, Diaz J, Ackerly DD (2019) No local adaptation in leaf or stem xylem vulnerability to embolism, but consistent vulnerability segmentation in a North American oak. New Phytol 223:1296–1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sonawane BV, Koteyeva NK, Johnson DM, Cousins AB (2021) Differences in leaf anatomy determines temperature response of leaf hydraulic and mesophyll CO2 conductance in phylogenetically related C4 and C3 grass species. New Phytol 230:1802–1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tetegan M, Nicoullaud B, Baize D, Bouthier A, Cousin I (2011) The contribution of rock fragments to the available water content of stony soils: proposition of new pedotransfer functions. Geoderma 165:40–49. [Google Scholar]
- Trifilò P, Petruzzellis F, Abate E, Nardini A (2021) The extra-vascular water pathway regulates dynamic leaf hydraulic decline and recovery in Populus nigra. Physiol Plant 172:29–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trifilò P, Raimondo F, Savi T, Lo Gullo MA, Nardini A (2016) The contribution of vascular and extra-vascular water pathways to drought-induced decline of leaf hydraulic conductance. J Exp Bot 67:5029–5039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner NC (1988) Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrig Sci 9:289–308. [Google Scholar]
- Turner NC (2017) Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment, an adaptive mechanism for coping with plant water deficits. Plant Cell Environ 40:1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang QW, Liu C, Robson TM, Hikosaka K, Kurokawa H (2021) Leaf density and chemical composition explain variation in leaf mass area with spectral composition among 11 widespread forbs in a common garden. Physiol Plant 173:698–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei T, Simko VR (2021) Package “corrplot”: visualization of a correlation matrix (version 0.88). Github [Internet]. Statistician 56:e24. https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot (21 May 2021, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
- Weithmann G, Link RM, Banzragch BE, Würzberg L, Leuschner C, Schuldt B (2022) Soil water availability and branch age explain variability in xylem safety of European beech in Central Europe. Oecologia 198:629–644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams LE, Araujo FJ (2002) Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J Am Soc Hort Sci 127:448–454. [Google Scholar]
- Wu F, Bao WK, Li FL, Wu N (2008) Effects of drought stress and N supply on the growth, biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Sophora davidii seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 63:248–255. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong D, Flexas J (2022) Safety–efficiency tradeoffs? Correlations of photosynthesis, leaf hydraulics, and dehydration tolerance across species. Oecologia 200:51–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu XL, Ma KM, Fu BJ, Song CJ, Liu W (2008) Relationships between vegetation and soil and topography in a dry warm river valley, SW China. Catena 75:138–145. [Google Scholar]
- Yang J, El-Kassaby YA, Guan W (2020) The effect of slope aspect on vegetation attributes in a mountainous dry valley, Southwest China. Sci Rep 10:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang YJ, Bi MH, Nie ZF, Jiang H, Liu XD, Fang XW, Brodribb TJ (2021) Evolution of stomatal closure to optimize water-use efficiency in response to dehydration in ferns and seed plants. New Phytol 230:2001–2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao GQ, Nie ZF, Turner NC, Li FM, Gao TP, Fang XW, Scoffoni C (2021a) Combined high leaf hydraulic safety and efficiency provides drought tolerance in Caragana species adapted to low mean annual precipitation. New Phytol 229:230–244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao GQ, Nie ZF, Zeng YY, Waseem M, Hasan MM, Tian XQ, Liao ZQ, Siddique KHM, Fang XW (2021b) A clear trade-off between leaf hydraulic efficiency and safety in an aridland shrub during regrowth. Plant Cell Environ 44:3347–3357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang XL, Hu H, Li FL, Huang L, Bao WK (2023) Within leaf nitrogen allocation regulates the photosynthetic behavior of xerophytes in response to increased soil rock fragment content. Plant Physiol Biochem 200:107753. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Zhang M, Niu J, Li H, Xiao R, Zheng H, Bech J (2016) Rock fragments and soil hydrological processes: significance and progress. Catena 147:153–166. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu SD, Song JJ, Li RH, Ye Q (2013) Plant hydraulics and photosynthesis of 34 woody species from different successional stages of subtropical forests. Plant Cell Environ 36:879–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu SD, Chen YJ, Ye Q, He PC, Liu H, Li RH, Fu PL, Jiang GF, Cao KF (2018) Leaf turgor loss point is correlated with drought tolerance and leaf carbon economics traits. Tree Physiol 38:658–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or Supplementary data, and all raw data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.






