Abstract
Varicose veins of the lower extremities (VVLEs) are prevalent globally. This study aims to identify prognostic factors and develop a prediction model for recurrence survival (RS) in VVLEs patients after surgery. A retrospective analysis of VVLEs patients from the Third Hospital of Nanchang was conducted between April 2017 and March 2022. A LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regression model pinpointed significant recurrence predictors, culminating in a prognostic nomogram. The model’s performance was evaluated by C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The LASSO regression identified seven predictors for the nomogram predicting 1-, 2-, and 5-year RS. These predictors were age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, the Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathophysiological (CEAP) grade, iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS), and postoperative compression stocking duration (PCSD). The nomogram’s C-index was 0.716, with AUCs (Area Under the Curve scores) of 0.705, 0.725, and 0.758 for 1-, 2-, and 5-year RS, respectively. Calibration and decision curve analyses validated the model’s predictive accuracy and clinical utility. Kaplan–Meier analysis distinguished between low and high-risk groups with significant prognostic differences (P < 0.05). This study has successfully developed and validated a nomogram for predicting RS in patients with VVLEs after surgery, enhancing personalized care and informing clinical decision-making.
Keywords: Varicose veins of the lower extremities, Recurrence survival, Prognostic model, Nomogram, LASSO regression
Subject terms: Risk factors, Signs and symptoms
Introduction
Varicose veins of the lower extremity (VVLEs) are a widespread clinical condition, with prevalence rates spanning from 14 to 64% across the general population. The more advanced stages of VVLEs impact an estimated 3.3% to 9.6% of individuals1,2. This condition is characterized by a range of symptoms, including leg pain, swelling, itching, fatigue, and, in more severe cases, changes in skin and soft tissue such as pigmentation, eczema, skin hardening, and ulceration. These symptoms can significantly diminish a patient’s quality of life3,4.
The spectrum of treatment options for VVLEs ranges from conservative measures, like medication and compression therapy, to surgical interventions, including high ligation, stripping, laser therapy, and radiofrequency ablation5,6. Although surgical treatments can alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life, the recurrence rates post-operation are notably high, with estimates suggesting a 25% to 50% recurrence within five years7,8. Thus, accurately predicting a patient’s risk of post-surgical recurrence is crucial for tailoring personalized treatment plans and follow-up strategies.
Recent advancements have further enriched our understanding of VVLEs and their management. Notably, there has been a growing interest in minimally invasive techniques and their role in reducing recovery time, minimizing complications, and potentially lowering recurrence rates. Technologies such as endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have emerged as promising alternatives to traditional surgery, with recent studies highlighting their efficacy and patient satisfaction scores9,10. Moreover, the role of genetic predisposition and molecular biology in the development and progression of VVLEs is gaining attention11, suggesting potential areas for therapeutic intervention and risk assessment.
Previous studies have focused on factors influencing postoperative recurrence, previously identified as age, genetics, gender, body mass index (BMI), occupational habits (prolonged standing or sitting), and disease severity (CEAP grade)12–14. Limitations of earlier studies include small, single-center samples and basic statistical analyses, restricting the accuracy and applicability of their findings.
In response, we introduce the Nomogram model, a graphical predictive tool integrating multiple prognostic factors to yield a precise predictive score. Already successful in forecasting outcomes in cancers, cardiovascular, and chronic kidney diseases, this study explores the Nomogram model’s efficacy in predicting postoperative recurrence risk in VVLEs patients.
Materials and methods
Study population
This study retrospectively analyzed patients with primary VVLEs admitted to the Third Hospital of Nanchang City between April 2017 and March 2022. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 75 years with Doppler ultrasound and/or venography-confirmed VVLEs, without concurrent lower limb injuries or fractures, and had at least one postoperative follow-up. Exclusions included incomplete demographic data, prior varicose vein surgery, or pregnancy/lactation. Recurrence post-surgery was defined as persistence or return of varicose veins15,16. Study flow is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Data selection
Research data were collected on gender, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), smoking and drinking history, hypertension, diabetes, the Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathophysiological (CEAP) grade, iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) diagnosis (confirmed by CT venography17), postoperative complications (PC), and postoperative compression stocking duration (PCSD).
For simplicity, BMI was categorized as < 25 kg/m2 or ≥ 25 kg/m2; CEAP grading as ≤ 4 or > 4; and compression stocking duration as < 3 months or ≥ 3 months18,19. Recorded complications included deep vein thrombosis, hemorrhage, infection, nerve damage, venous inflammation, skin pigmentation, varicose vein recurrence, and lymphedema.
Follow-up
Follow-up was conducted until April 2023, with initial quarterly and then annual visits post-surgery. It included clinical evaluations and ultrasound scans to assess recovery and detect recurrence.
Statistical analyses
The statistical analyses for this study were conducted using R software (version 4.1.2). The baseline characteristics between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups were compared using the Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. LASSO regression analysis was performed using the ‘glmnet’ package in R. By applying the ‘cox’ family, the Cox proportional hazards model was implemented in the LASSO analysis to select the most predictive variables for survival. Survival analysis was conducted and a nomogram was created using the ‘rms’ and ‘survival’ packages in R. packages in R. The ‘survminer’ package was used to visualize the survival analysis. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by generating a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the ‘timeROC’ and ‘pROC’ packages. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were further evaluated by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and the area under the curve (AUC)20. Calibration of the nomogram was performed by generating a calibration curve with the ‘calibrationCurves’ package to assess the agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. We also conducted a decision curve analysis (DCA) using the ‘DCA.R’ or ‘rmda’ packages to evaluate the clinical usefulness and net benefit of the nomogram. X-tile software is used to find the best cutoff value for the total point, patients in both groups were then classified into high, medium and low risk groups. Survival was compared using Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank tests. P-value < 0.05 (two-sided) was considered as statistically significant.
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital’s ethics committee, adhering to the Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.
Results
Patient characteristics
In this study, 616 patients met the inclusion criteria. They were followed for a median duration of 16.8 months post-VVLEs surgery. Recurrence was observed in 84 (13.6%) patients. Based on recurrence, participants were divided into two cohorts: recurrence (n = 84) and non-recurrence (n = 532). The baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The cohort predominantly comprised males (58.6%), individuals aged < 60 years (58.3%), with a BMI < 25 kg/m2 (63.0%). Most patients reported no alcohol consumption (62.3%) or smoking (69.5%). A significant proportion had a CEAP grade ≥ 4 (58.3%) and no history of IVCS (61.7%). Few patients had a prior PC (6.7%), but a majority had a PCSD ≥ 3 months (83.0%). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of gender, alcohol consumption, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, IVCS, and PC (P > 0.05). However, age, BMI, CEAP grade, and PCSD differed significantly (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variables | Total | Recurrence | Non-recurrence | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 616) | (n = 84) | (n = 532) | Re versus Non-re | |
Gender | 0.238 | |||
Female | 255 (41.7%) | 40 (47.6%) | 217 (40.8%) | |
Male | 361 (58.6%) | 44 (52.4%) | 315 (59.2%) | |
Age (yrs)_ | 0.009 | |||
< 60 | 359 (58.3%) | 38 (45.2%) | 321 (60.3%) | |
≥ 60 | 257 (41.7%) | 46 (54.8%) | 211 (39.7%) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.002 | |||
< 25 | 388 (63.0%) | 40 (47.6%) | 348 (65.4%) | |
≥ 25 | 228 (37.0%) | 44 (52.4%) | 184 (34.6%) | |
Drinking | 0.521 | |||
No | 384 (62.3%) | 36 (42.9%) | 248 (46.6%) | |
Yes | 332 (37.7%) | 48 (57.1%) | 284 (53.4%) | |
Smoking | 0.677 | |||
No | 428 (69.5%) | 60 (9.7%) | 368 (69.2%) | |
Yes | 188 (30.5%) | 24 (90.3%) | 164 (30.8%) | |
Hypertension | 0.116 | |||
No | 474 (76.9%) | 59 (9.6%) | 415 (78.0%) | |
Yes | 14 (23.1%) | 25 (90.4%) | 117 (22.0%) | |
Diabetes | 0.076 | |||
No | 577 (93.6%) | 75 (87.8%) | 502 (94.4%) | |
Yes | 39 (6.4%) | 9 (12.2%) | 30 (5.6%) | |
CEAP grade | 0.004 | |||
< 4 | 257 (41.7%) | 47 (56.0%) | 210 (39.5%) | |
≥ 4 | 359 (58.3%) | 37 (44.0%) | 322 (60.5%) | |
IVCS | 0.135 | |||
No | 380 (61.7%) | 58 (69.4%) | 322 (60.5%) | |
Yes | 236 (38.3%) | 26 (30.6%) | 210 (39.5%) | |
PC | 0.417 | |||
No | 575 (93.3%) | 77 (91.7%) | 500 (94.0%) | |
Yes | 41 (6.7%) | 7 (8.3%) | 32 (6.0%) | |
PCSD (mos) | 0.016 | |||
< 3 | 105 (17.0%) | 22 (26.2%) | 83 (15.6%) | |
≥ 3 | 511 (83.0%) | 62 (73.8%) | 449 (84.4%) |
Re recurrence, non-re non-recurrence, BMI body mass index, CEAP Clinical Etiological anatomical pathophysiological, IVCS Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome, PC Postoperative complication, PCSD Postoperative compression stocking duration.
Establishment and validation of the nomogram model
LASSO regression was employed to identify predictors from baseline characteristics (Fig. 2), reducing 11 variables to seven significant predictors: age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, CEAP grade, IVCS, and PCSD. The LASSO coefficients of these variables are detailed in Table 2. A nomogram was developed to predict 1-, 2-, and 5-year RS post-VVLEs surgery (Fig. 3). The nomogram model allocated scores as follows: Age < 60 years (0 points), ≥ 60 (72.5 points); BMI < 25 kg/m2 (0 points), ≥ 25 kg/m2 (92.5 points); hypertension: no (0 points), yes (20 points); diabetes: no (0 points), yes (35 points); CEAP grade: no (0 points), yes (72.5 points); IVCS: no (0 points), yes (40 points); PCSD: yes (0 points), no (100 points). The total score, representing the sum of the points from these seven items, correlates with the individual risk of developing 1-, 2-, and 5-year RS post-VVLEs surgery. The model demonstrated adequate discriminative ability with a C-index of 0.716 (95%CI: 0.698–0.813). AUC values for 1-, 2-, and 5-year predictions were 0.705, 0.725, and 0.758, respectively, indicating good model performance (Fig. 4A–C). Calibration curves showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (Fig. 4D–F). Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) indicated that the nomogram provided greater net benefits than standard care across various threshold probabilities (Fig. 4G–I).
Table 2.
Variable | Lasso Coefficient |
---|---|
Age | 0.303479314998822 |
BMI | 0.466230682818106 |
hypertension | 0.0620216199993233 |
diabetes | 0.0948694924825136 |
CEAP grade | 0.365652081766411 |
IVCS | 0.167110569883559 |
PCSD | − 0.462923291869389 |
Selected variables and their lasso coefficients from cox proportional hazards model.
Nomogram to stratify patient’s recurrence risk
Using a nomogram, we calculated the total score for each patient, which served as a basis for risk stratification. The optimal cutoff value for categorizing patients into different risk groups was established at 225, determined by the X-tile software analysis. Consequently, patients were divided into two main categories based on their total scores: those with scores of 225 or less were placed into the low risk subgroup, whereas patients with scores exceeding 225 were classified into the high risk subgroup. This stratification was further refined as patients were grouped into low-score and high-score categories according to the nomogram’s criteria. The impact of these risk categories on patient outcomes was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, coupled with a log-rank test, which revealed significant differences in the survival outcomes between the low and high-risk groups (P < 0.05), as illustrated in Fig. 5. Notably, patients within the high-risk group exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis when compared to their counterparts in the low-risk group. This clear demarcation between the groups underscores the utility of the nomogram.
Discussion
This study enhances the existing body of knowledge by developing and validating a nomogram designed to predict the risk of recurrence following surgical procedures for VVLEs. Given the significant impact of VVLE recurrence on patient quality of life and healthcare costs, a reliable predictive tool is crucial for improving postoperative management and facilitating tailored treatment strategies.
In our analysis, we employed LASSO regression to identify key predictors of recurrence from a wide range of variables. We determined that age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, CEAP grade, and IVCS are significant factors influencing the likelihood of recurrence, highlighting the multifaceted nature of VVLEs’ recurrence. Age, an unmodifiable factor, is associated with reduced venous wall elasticity and valvular dysfunction, aligning with increased postoperative recurrence risk reported in literature21. An increased BMI is linked to heightened venous system pressure, possibly leading to the formation and recurrence of varicosities22. Hypertension and diabetes, prevalent chronic conditions worldwide, may increase the risk of VVLEs recurrence by affecting the vascular wall and microcirculation23,24. Evidence suggests that these systemic diseases are linked to venous thrombosis through endothelial dysfunction and heightened inflammatory states, potentially leading to valvular incompetence25–27. The CEAP grade, which gauges the severity of VVLEs, demonstrates the impact of disease extent on recurrence risk28. IVCS, a common cause of lower extremity venous reflux, significantly increases the risk of postoperative recurrence by raising venous pressure and impeding venous return, potentially leading to new venous abnormalities and exacerbating symptoms of venous insufficiency29.
Our findings also highlight the duration of PCSD as an important predictor of recurrence, in agreement with previous studies30–32. Long-term use of compression stockings can reduce the risk of varicose vein recurrence by alleviating postoperative swelling, supporting the venous system, and minimizing blood stasis, thereby maintaining valvular function33. However, there is no consensus on the optimal duration of PCSD, suggesting that it should be tailored based on individual patient circumstances and risk factors, a customization our nomogram model supports.
By integrating these variables into the nomogram model, we provide an intuitive tool to calculate the probability of recurrence at various time points post-surgery for VVLEs patients. The model’s C-index of 0.716 indicates good predictive ability. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) demonstrates the model’s predictive capacity at 1, 2, and 5 years as 0.705, 0.725, and 0.758, respectively, signifying its accuracy in distinguishing between high and low-risk patients. The calibration curve’s high concordance further emphasizes the reliability of our predictions. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) indicates that our nomogram has practical value in clinical decision-making, offering personalized treatment recommendations and preventing unnecessary or excessive treatment.
However, our study has limitations. Firstly, being retrospective, it may be subject to selection and information bias. Secondly, despite its good predictive performance, the model’s small sample size of recurrence cases, only 84, necessitates validation in larger-scale, multicenter studies. Furthermore, the diversity of surgical techniques prevented their consideration as a unified predictive factor, another limitation. Lastly, we acknowledge the need for future studies to delve into potential influencing factors, such as genetics, lifestyle, and socioeconomic aspects, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex causes behind the recurrence of VVLEs post-surgery. It is also worth noting that integrating computational biology into VVLEs research could significantly enhance the understanding and management of the disease11,34. By delving into the roles of miRNAs and lncRNAs in gene regulation relevant to VVLEs, researchers have the potential to uncover genetic markers and new targets for treatment, paving the way for personalized medical approaches and improved treatment effectiveness35–37. Additionally, concentrating on the interactions between miRNAs and lncRNAs emerges as a promising avenue for advancing VVLEs management and patient care38–40. The employment of theoretical models based on ordinary differential equations (ODE) is particularly crucial in shedding light on the regulatory mechanisms within gene/protein signaling networks associated with VVLEs recurrence41–43. Such models offer profound insights into the complex biological systems governing variceal recurrence, highlighting the importance of these mechanisms for a deeper understanding of the disease’s causes35,44,45. By investigating these regulatory mechanisms, researchers are poised to identify novel therapeutic targets and intervention strategies, ultimately contributing to a more robust scientific foundation for VVLEs management. This approach is not only pivotal for enhancing our comprehension of the disease but also provides a crucial direction for future research aimed at predicting and managing VVLEs, thereby underscoring the significance of incorporating theoretical models into VVLEs research.
Despite these limitations, our study provides new insights into the postoperative management of VVLEs. Using our nomogram model, physicians can offer more accurate risk assessments and treatment recommendations to patients. Future research should focus on refining and validating the model and its applicability across different populations for broader clinical use.
In conclusion, the developed nomogram is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative recurrence risk in patients with VVLEs. By analyzing key predictive factors comprehensively, this model aids in guiding personalized patient management and treatment decisions. Reducing postoperative recurrence can enhance patients’ quality of life and decrease the burden on healthcare systems. We hope this model will be widely applied and enhanced in diverse clinical settings.
Conclusion
This study successfully developed and validated a nomogram for predicting RS in patients with VVLEs after surgery. Integrating multiple important predictive factors, including age, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, CEAP classification, IVCS, and PCSD, this model holds significant clinical value. It enables physicians to provide more precise risk assessments and treatment recommendations for their patients.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to extend their heartfelt thanks to Juntao Tan, whose skillful language editing and refinement significantly enhanced the quality of the manuscript.
Author contributions
H.H. and L.H. conceived the study and contributed equally to this work. Z.D. collected the data. Q.J. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript as the corresponding author. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Data availability
The primary data can be acquired from the corresponding authors in compliance with privacy and ethical constraints.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Hai Hu and Lili Hu.
References
- 1.Spinedi L, Uthoff H, Partovi S, Staub D. Varicosities of the lower extremity, new approaches: Cosmetic or therapeutic needs? Swiss Med. Weekly. 2016;146:w14360. doi: 10.4414/smw.2016.14360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rabe E, et al. Epidemiology of chronic venous disorders in geographically diverse populations: Results from the Vein Consult Program. Int. Angiol.: A J. Int. Union Angiol. 2012;31:105–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kouri B. Current evaluation and treatment of lower extremity varicose veins. Am. J. Med. 2009;122:513–515. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pappas PJ, Lal BK, Padberg FT, Jr, Zickler RW, Duran WN. Pathophysiology of chronic venous insufficiency. Vein Book. 2007;23:89–101. doi: 10.1016/B978-012369515-4/50012-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kheirelseid EAH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2018;6:256–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gloviczki P, et al. The 2022 society for vascular surgery, American venous forum, and American vein and lymphatic society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part I. duplex scanning and treatment of superficial truncal reflux: Endorsed by the society for vascular medicine and the international union of phlebology. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2023;11:231–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maeseneer MGRD, Biemans AA, Pichot O. New concepts on recurrence of varicose veins according to the different treatment techniques. Phlébologie. 2013;66:54–60. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Winterborn RJ, Foy C, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. Randomised trial of flush saphenofemoral ligation for primary great saphenous varicose veins. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Vasc. Surg. 2008;36:477–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Conway RG, et al. Clinical response to combination therapy in the treatment of varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2020;8:216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gao RD, Qian SY, Wang HH, Liu YS, Ren SY. Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency. World J. Clin. Cases. 2022;10:5946–5956. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.5946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hu H, et al. Modeling and analyzing single-cell multimodal data with deep parametric inference. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24:bbad005. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, Neumann M, Nijsten T. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: A meta-analysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009;49:230–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brake M, Lim CS, Shepherd AC, Shalhoub J, Davies AH. Pathogenesis and etiology of recurrent varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. 2013;57:860–868. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Robertson L, Evans C, Fowkes FG. Epidemiology of chronic venous disease. Phlebology. 2008;23:103–111. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2007.007061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Perrin MR, et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2000;8:233–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Perrin M, Allaert FA. Intra- and Inter-observer reproducibility of the recurrent varicose veins after surgery (REVAS) classification. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2006;32:326–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zeng M, et al. Effectiveness of iliac vein stenting combined with endovenous laser treatment of recurrent varicose veins associated with iliac vein compression. Quant Imaging Med. Surg. 2023;13:5986–5995. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abarca-Gómez L, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults - ScienceDirect. Lancet. 2017;390:2627–2642. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kröger K, et al. Peripheral veins: Influence of gender, body mass index, age and varicose veins on cross-sectional area. Vasc. Med. 2003;8:249–255. doi: 10.1191/1358863x03vm508oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Koller M, Witteman J, Steyerberg E. Prognostic models with competing risks: Methods and application to coronary risk prediction. Epidemiology. 2009;20:555–561. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a39056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mouton WG, et al. The influence of age on valve disease in patients with varicose veins analysed by transmission electron microscopy and stereology. J. Vasc. Dis. 2018;47:1–7. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mekako AI, Chetter IC, Coughlin PA, Hatfield J, Mccollum PT. Randomized clinical trial of co-amoxiclav versus no antibiotic prophylaxis in varicose vein surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2010;97:29–36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Komsuoğlu B, Göldeli O, Kulan K, Cetinarslan B, Komsuoğlu SS. Prevalence and risk factors of varicose veins in an elderly population. Gerontology. 1994;40:25–31. doi: 10.1159/000213571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ali, S. A. et al. Prevalence of varicose veins among nurses in different departments in Jazan public hospitals, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Cureus14, (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Knight SF, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and the development of renal injury in spontaneously hypertensive rats fed a high-fat diet. Hypertension. 2008;51(2):352–359. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.099499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Poredos P, Jezovnik MK. In patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis, interleukin-10 is decreased and related to endothelial dysfunction. Heart Vessels. 2011;26:596. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ryman VE, Packiriswamy N, Sordillo LM. Role of endothelial cells in bovine mammary gland health and disease. Animal Health Res. Rev. 2015;16:135–149. doi: 10.1017/S1466252315000158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Farah MH, et al. A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2022;10:1155–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kong J, Liu P, Li J, Fan X, Ye Z. Surgical treatment of recurrent varicose veins in the lower limbs associated with endovascular treatment of iliac vein stenosis. Int. J. Surg. (London, England) 2018;50:110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chou JH, et al. Optimal duration of compression stocking therapy following endovenous thermal ablation for great saphenous vein insufficiency: A meta-analysis - ScienceDirect. Int. J. Surg. 2019;65:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pittaluga P, Chastanet S. Value of postoperative compression after mini-invasive surgical treatment of varicose veins. J. Vasc. Surg.: Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2013;1(4):385–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Elderman JH, Krasznai AG, Voogd AC, Hulsewé KW, Sikkink CJ. Role of compression stockings after endovenous laser therapy for primary varicosis. J. Vasc. Surg.: Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2014;2(3):289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rastel D, Perrin M, Guidicelli H. Compressive therapy after varicose vein surgery: Results of a French national inquiry. J. Des Maladies Vascu. 2004;29:27. doi: 10.1016/S0398-0499(04)96709-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hu H, et al. Gene function and cell surface protein association analysis based on single-cell multiomics data. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023;157:106733. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang W, Zhang L, Sun J, Zhao Q, Shuai J. Predicting the potential human lncRNA-miRNA interactions based on graph convolution network with conditional random field. Brief Bioinform. 2022;23:463. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang L, Yang P, Feng H, Zhao Q, Liu H. Using network distance analysis to predict lncRNA-miRNA interactions. Interdiscip. Sci. 2021;13:535–545. doi: 10.1007/s12539-021-00458-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen Z, et al. DCAMCP: A deep learning model based on capsule network and attention mechanism for molecular carcinogenicity prediction. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2023;27:3117–3126. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meng R, Yin S, Sun J, Hu H, Zhao Q. scAAGA: Single cell data analysis framework using asymmetric autoencoder with gene attention. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023;165:107414. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao J, Sun J, Shuai SC, Zhao Q, Shuai J. Predicting potential interactions between lncRNAs and proteins via combined graph auto-encoder methods. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24:527. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gao H, et al. Predicting metabolite-disease associations based on auto-encoder and non-negative matrix factorization. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24:259. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li X, et al. Caspase-1 and gasdermin D afford the optimal targets with distinct switching strategies in NLRP1b inflammasome-induced cell death. Res. (Wash D C) 2022;2022:9838341. doi: 10.34133/2022/9838341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jin J, et al. Biphasic amplitude oscillator characterized by distinct dynamics of trough and crest. Phys. Rev. E. 2023;108:064412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.064412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jin J, Xu F, Liu Z, Shuai J, Li X. Quantifying the underlying landscape, entropy production and biological path of the cell fate decision between apoptosis and pyroptosis. Chaos Solit. Fract. 2024;178:114328. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang T, Sun J, Zhao Q. Investigating cardiotoxicity related with hERG channel blockers using molecular fingerprints and graph attention mechanism. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023;153:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sun F, Sun J, Zhao Q. A deep learning method for predicting metabolite-disease associations via graph neural network. Brief Bioinform. 2022;23:266. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The primary data can be acquired from the corresponding authors in compliance with privacy and ethical constraints.