Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26896. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26896

Numerical study of copper antimony sulphide (CuSbS2) solar cell by SCAPS-1D

Nancy Obare a,, Wycliffe Isoe a, Amos Nalianya a, Maxwell Mageto a,b, Victor Odari a,b
PMCID: PMC10918202  PMID: 38455588

Abstract

Copper antimony sulphide thin films are promising, less toxic, and more absorbent material in the world, and they would be good to be applied in photovoltaic energy production. To better operations of copper antimony sulphide (CuSbS2) photovoltaic cells, this paper uses a solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS-1D) to simulate and analyze photovoltaic properties. This article examines different thicknesses of fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), cadmium sulphide (CdS), carbon (C), and CuSbS2, as well as the defect and dopant concentration in the CuSbS2 photoactive layer of the photovoltaic cell structure glass/FTO/n-CdS/p-CuSbS2/C/Au. Optimum thicknesses of CuSbS2 is 300 nm, carbon hole transport layer (HTL) is 50 nm, and for n-CdS electron transport layer (ETL) is 100 nm, giving open circuit Voltage (Voc) of 0.9389 V, short circuit current density (Jsc) of 28.32 mA/cm2, fill factor (FF) of 60.8% and solar cell efficiency of 16.17%. The increase in defects causes a decrease of carrier lifetime resulting in to decrease in diffusion length and the optimum absorber layer doping concentration was found to be 1018 cm−3.

Keywords: CuSbS2, SCAPS-1D, Thin film, Simulation

1. Introduction

The thin films based on chalcogenide have gained much interest from researchers as a promising material for application in photovoltaics. The highest efficiencies of thin films photovoltaic cells under the chalcogenide photoactive material like cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) are 22.9% and 23.1% respectively [1]. Perhaps, the toxic nature of cadmium and the high cost of indium, telluride, and gallium have been major limiting factors for the production of these solar cells [2]. Copper antimony sulphide is a ternary layer semiconductors with low toxicity, an optical bandgap of about 1.5 eV, and an absorption coefficient of above 105 cm−1 making it stable and suitable for large-scale photovoltaic power [3]. Several experimental investigations have been done on CuSbS2 photovoltaic cells. The efficiency of 3.13% was attained by the fabrication of copper antimony sulphide-based photovoltaic cells from electrodeposited copper/antimony stacked layers followed by sulphurization at 450 °C in hydrogen sulphide gas for 30 min [4]. Spin coated thin films of CuSbS2 thin films by Cu–Sb–S stock solution on fluorine-doped tin oxide substrates were reported by Yang et al., followed by multiple steps of annealing, and obtained an efficiency of 0.5% by simulation of the material using photovoltaic cell design FTO/CuSbS2/CdS/ZnO/ZnO:Al/Au. The obtained low power conversion efficiency was a result of low open-circuit voltage at the interface resulting from severe recombination loss between copper antimony sulphide and Cadmium sulphide layers [5]. Macias et al. studied the solar cell architecture SnO2:F/CdS/Sb2S3/CuSbS2/C:Ag and found an efficiency of 0.66% because of low open-circuit voltages [6]. Olopade investigated the effect of CdS, InS, ZnSe, and ZnS thin films material as buffer layers in copper antimony sulphide photovoltaic cells through computational using SCAPS-1D and reported an efficiency of 3.78% of the photovoltaic cell structure ZnO:Al/CdS/CuSbS2/Mo. By optimizing the indium sulphide buffer layer, the efficiency improved to 3.88% indicating that, it was an appropriate buffer layer although the cost of indium which is relatively expensive limits its use [7]. The effect of low open circuit voltage has a major challenge hindering the power conversion of this photovoltaic cells [8]. Also, by considering the solar cell structure In2S3/CdS/CuSbS2/Mo, an efficiency of 2.99% was attained which is due to a cliff-like conduction band [1]. Sadanand et al. did a comparison study between CZTS, CuSbS2, and CuSbSe2 using solar cell architecture ITO/ZnS/CuSbS2/Mo and obtained an efficiency of 17.3% while using CuSbS2 as absorber layer [9], indicating a promising result for an alternative material which is relatively cheap, earth-abundant and less toxic [10].

In device fabrication of solar cells, the choice of material for each layer has an impact on the workings of the cell. This research paper uses SCAPS-1D software developed by the University of Gent to perform numerical simulation of CuSbS2 photovoltaic cells with the architecture glass/FTO/n-CdS/p-CuSbS2/C/Au [11,12]. This project aims further improve its photovoltaic performance. This is done by determining optimal thickness of the hole transport layer (HTL), electron transport layer (ETL), and absorber layers and examining the effects of dopant concentration and defects on the photoactive layer.

2. Materials and methods

SCAPS-1D software developed by the University of Gent uses this program to solve semiconductor equations numerically under a steady state in one dimensional using Poisson's and continuity equations. The charges density space (ρ) and electric field (E) of a heterojunction given by the Poisson equation is given by the following relationship in equation (1) [13].

d2φdx2=qεoεr[NDNA]+(pxnx)+(Pppn) [1]

where ψ is electrostatic potential, q is charge, ND (NA) is donor or acceptor ionized density, n(p) is densities of electron or hole, εr is the medium's relative permittivity, and Pp/Pn is possible defects density of acceptors or donors. The continuity equation for a steady state of electron and hole is given in equations [2], [3]):

jnx+GUn(n,p)=0 [2]
jpx+GUp(n,p)=0 [3]

Jn, and jp are the current densities of electron and hole, G is the generation rates of electrons-holes, and U (n,p) is net recombination rates. Equations [4], [5]) gives electrons and holes densities as:

jn=qnμnE+qDnpx [4]
jp=qpμpEqDppx [5]

where q is the charge μn,(p), is the mobility of electrons or holes and Dn,(p) is the diffusion coefficient of an electron or a hole.

In this study, CuSbS2 was used as a photoactive material in the cell structure glass/FTO/n-CdS/p-CuSb2/C/Au to elaborate its optoelectronic properties and application in photovoltaics. CdS and C have been used as HTL and ETL, respectively. The back contact of gold with a work function 5.1 eV was used as a cathode. All simulations were done at a constant temperature of 300K, and incident power of 1000 W/m2 of the spectrum of AM 1.5G. we introduced one defect mechanism of single level (neutral) [13], with the single energetic distribution of 0.6 eV above the highest EV, for close examination of recombination and their impact on photovoltaic cell workings [14].

2.1. Material Parameters and numerical Model for the copper antimony sulphide solar cell

The structure and characterizing of the CuSbS2 model were simulated by SCAPS-1D version 3.3.07 [11]. The design of the photovoltaic cell was FTO/CdS (ETL)/CuSbS2(Absorber)/C(HTL)/Au (back contact) with CdS/CuSbS2 and CuSbS2/C interfaces having neutral defect layers as described in Fig. 1. Optimization of the solar cell structure of each layer is important for the performance of the photovoltaic cell, Fluorine-doped tin oxide is an n-type material with a wide bandgap of 3.5 eV and a work function of 4.4 eV was preferred as an anode (front contact) similar procedure to the work reported by Hossain and his coworkers [15,]. Cadmium sulphide was used as an electron transport layer hence preventing holes from reaching the front contact. FTO was preferred to ITO because it has special characteristics in chemical inertness, upon heating it is stable, hard mechanically, a good conductor, relatively cheap and its sheet resistance remains constant during sintering [16]. In addition, tin oxide films in the visible range are highly transparent. Table 1 shows layer values used in the study which were obtained from other reported works, [7,15].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

CuSbS2 solar cell architecture.

Table 1.

Simulation parameters for CuSbS2 photovoltaic cell.

Photovoltaic cell parameter FTO CuSbS2 CdS C
Bandgap, Eg (eV) 3.5 1.5 2.42 3
Thickness, d (μm) 0.1 (varied) 0.3 (varied) 0.01 0.35
Electron affinity, χe (eV) 4 3.85 4.5 2.45
Relative dielectric permittivity, 9 14.6 10 3
NC effective density (cm3) 2.2 ×1018 2.2 ×1018 2.2 ×1019 2.2 ×1018
NC effective density (cm3) 1.8 ×1019 1.8 ×1019 1.8 ×1019 1.8 ×1019
Thermal velocity of electron (cm/s) 1.8 ×107 1.8 ×107 1.0 ×107 1.0 ×107
Thermal velocity of a hole (cm/s) 1.0 ×107 1.0 ×107 1.0 ×107 1.0 ×107
Mobility of electron, μn (cm2/Vs) 20 60 100 104
Hole mobility, μp (cm2/Vs) 10 20 25 104
Donor density o, ND (cm3) 1 ×1018 1 ×1017
NA Acceptor density 1 × 1018 2 × 1018

2.2. Alignment of band structure

The operation of the photovoltaic cell devices depends on the alignment of band structure for the transportation of photogenerated carriers and it is also affected by the different electron affinity between buffer material and absorber material [17,18]. The optimized band diagram is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Energy band diagram.

Where Ec, Ev, Fp, and Fn are conduction energy, valence energy, and Quasi-Femi energy for electron and hole respectively. The electron affinity and photoactive layer give the nature of heterointerface band, [19]. From the alignment, there is a spike-like conduction bands offset at CdS implying an inbuilt potential barrier to photogenerated electrons [20]. This is the limiting factor because, a cliff-like conductions bands offsets rejects electron coming from a forward biasing, faces hindrance at CdS/CuSbS2 interface and recombination between majority charge carriers rises through defects available at the interface leading to a decrease of open circuit voltage.

3. Result and discussion

3.1. Impact of fluorine-doped tin oxide thickness

Transparent conductive oxide (TCOs) are used as a front electrode and as a backside reflector [21]. The working of the copper antimony sulphide cell was studied from the variation of FTO thickness. The analysis of short-circuit current density, open-circuit voltage, fill factor, and solar cell efficiency, as a variable of FTO thickness from 100 nm to 600 nm are indicated in Fig. 3,while other layer values were kept constant. Fig. 3(a) indicates less change in open-circuit voltage and a slight decrease in short-circuit current density from 28.28 to 28.19 mA/cm2 with an increase in FTO thickness.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Variation of (a) Voc and Jsc (b) FF and efficiency with FTO thickness.

Fig. 3(b) indicates an increase of FF from 60.70% to 60.85% with an increment in FTO thickness from 100 nm to 600 nm and a slight reduction in efficiency from 16.17% to 16.10%. From the above, the decrease in efficiency by a small margin (0.070) has no much significance on the solar cell. An increase in FTO thickness from 100 nm to 600 nm does not have a significant effect, the thicker the layer, the more the absorption of photons. Therefore, 100 nm thick FTO was chosen to obtain the maximum Voc of the photovoltaic cell [22].

3.2. Impact of CdS thickness

Cadmium sulphide has a major impact in operations of photovoltaic cell; transporting the generated electron from a photoactive layer to the front contact and hindering the hole from arriving at fluorine doped tin oxide electrode. The variation of Cadmium sulphide thicknesses were done from 10 nm to 500 nm while the thickness of Carbon were maintained at 50 nm, FTO at 100 nm, and CuSbS2 at 300 nm. From the simulation, both Voc and Jsc decrease with an increase in CdS thickness as elaborated in Fig. 4(a), also the fill factors and power conversion efficiencies reduced with the rise of the electron transport thickness layer as indicated in Fig. 4(b). Result implies that thicknesses increase causes charge recombination on ETL due to charges staying for a long time at the layer hence recombining with oppositely charged particles through the interface with the photoactive layer. Also, the increase of CdS in the path of incident solar radiation may have decreased transmittance therefore the delivered photons to CuSbS2 would have been less leading to low Voc. Because of the reduction in Voc, it also reduces the efficiency and the FF of the photovoltaic cell, this might have been a result of the rising of series resistance with increment in electron transport layer thicknesses. Therefore, optimum ETL thickness is 50 nm which gave the solar cell efficiency of 16.17%.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

(a)Variation of Voc and Jsc (b) FF and efficiency with CdS thickness.

3.3. Effect of CuSbS2 thickness

Thickness of photoactive layer determines the power conversion efficiency of the device, simulation of the photovoltaic cell was done to investigate the influence of CuSbS2 thickness on cell variables i.e. Voc, Jsc, FF, and efficiency. By maintaining other variable thicknesses constant, Variation of photoactive layer thickness was done from 200 nm to 1200 nm and considering that the absorber thickness must be greater than any other layer [18]. Fig. 5(a) depicts Voc and Jsc as dependent on CuSbS2 thickness and Fig. 5(b) illustrates FF and efficiency of the photovoltaic cell as a variable of CuSbS2 thickness. From Fig. 5(a) there is an increase of Jsc with the increment of FTO thicknesses, this is because of an increase of the absorbed radiations and carrier concentrations leading to a rise in Jsc as the thicknesses of the photoactive layer are increased. The increment in Jsc is related to a higher absorption coefficient of 105 cm−1 of CuSbS2 layer [23]. It is also noted that there is a reduction in Voc when the absorber layer is above 700 nm, this results from recombination of charge carriers caused by the increment of absorber thickness resulting from near the center of the CuSbS2 layer which recombines when diffusion length exceeds the absorber thickness. In addition, the effective bandgap of copper antimony sulphide is decreased by the increase of its thickness leading to a reduction in Voc [17,18]. The fill factor slightly decreased from 61.38 to 60.70% as the thickness of CuSbS2 was increased. This is because the resistance increases with the increase in photoactive thickness resulting into reduced fill factor [24]. Also, due to an increment in recombination and a decline in extraction rate of charge carriers, the efficiency reduces slightly at a higher thickness. Therefore, an increment in photoactive thickness leads to the rate of absorption of long-wavelength solar irradiance to increase exciton generation and dissociation hence leading to more pairs of electron-hole thus the improvement of efficiency [9]. Therefore, the optimum thickness for the photoactive layer was 300 nm with a photovoltaic cell efficiency of 16.17%

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(a)Variation of Voc and Jsc (b) FF and efficiency with CuSbS2 thickness.

3.4. Effect of carbon thickness

Carbon has a role in transporting the generated holes in the operations of the photovoltaic cells by blocking electrons [25]. While maintaining the thickness of CdS at 50 nm, CuSbS2 at 300 nm, and FTO at 100 nm variation of carbon thicknesses were done from 50 nm to 500 nm. From results obtained, Fig. 6(a) shows Voc and Jsc as a variable of C thickness while Fig. 6(b) indicates the FF and power conversion efficiency as variables of C thickness, an increment in HTL thickness caused a decline of FF and efficiency because of also a decline of irradiance and increase in recombination of charge carriers similar to work done by Hossain and his coworkers [26].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a)Variation of Voc and Jsc (b) FF and efficiency with C thickness.

3.5. Effect of the doping concentration of CuSbS2 layer on photovoltaic cell parameters

The electrical characteristics of the CuSbS2 materials are affected by its doping concentration which also influences the working of the photovoltaic cell. The effect of changing the doping concentration of the photoactive layer was done from 1 × 1014cm−3 to 1 × 1018 cm−3 to investigate the effect on solar cell parameters while absorber thickness was maintained at 300 nm. Results of the varied doping concentrations are indicated in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(a)Variation of Voc and Jsc (b) FF and efficiency with dopant concentration.

The solar cell efficiency is more than 16% and the current density is highest at the doping concentration of 1018cm−3as shown above in Fig. 7(b). The Voc increases steadily as the concentration increases as shown in Fig. 7(a), because of the effective transport of charge carriers, although, at a doping concentration of 1 × 1017cm−3 the fill factor reduced slightly because of the reduction in ratio amongst the rates of recombination and generations of charge carrier in the major part of absorber layer as reported by Nalianya et al. [20]; the reduction of recombination rate is caused by an increment generation rate of free charges and increase in doping concentration, hence the FF starts to rise again, this is due to in p-type section there is an increase of majority carriers with the raising of acceptor dopant of copper antimony sulphide materials. Because high concentration leads to more auger recombination resulting in to increase in forward biasing.

3.6. Effect of defect density of absorber layer on solar cell parameters

The effect of the increase in defects density of the photoactive layer ware analyzed from 1 × 108 cm−3 to 1 × 1010 cm−3 while maintaining the cross-sectional area at 1 × 10−19 cm−2. An increment in defects density caused increment of charge carrier recombination that resulted in a reduction of carrier lifetime and a decrease in diffusion length as shown in Table 2. Carrier lifetime increased when defects density reduced, leading to diffusion lengths becoming longer because of few recombination.

Table 2.

The relationship between defect density and diffusion length.

Parameter
Defect density (cm−3) 1010 109 108
Diffusion Length (nm) 719.53 2275.0 7195.3

3.7. J-V characteristics of the optimized parameters

The simulation result in Fig. 8 indicates that copper antimony sulphide has the ability to be an absorber material for application in photovoltaics because it shows a Voc of 0.9389 V, Jsc of 28.32 mA/cm−2, FF of 60.8%, and power conversion efficiency of 16.17% while using carbon as HTL. The J-V characteristic of optimized film without carbon depicted the open-circuit voltage of 0.2419 V, Jsc of 28.22 mA/cm−2, FF of 44.47 %, and efficiency of 3.4%.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

J–V curve of optimized solar cell with and without HTL.

4. Conclusion

CuSbS2 solar cell with design glass/SnO2: F/CdS/CuSbS2/C/Au was simulated vividly using SCAPS-1D software. The research on the impact of variation of layers thicknesses of FTO, CdS, CuSbS2, and C was done on the device performances. From the simulations, CdS thickness variations have no much changes in the cell performance and the photoactive layer thickness of 300 nm–400 nm is appropriate for the workings of the device hence thicker photoactive layer may not have many benefits. Further, the thicknesses of 100 nm, 50 nm, 300 nm, and 100 nm for FTO, CdS, CuSbS2, and C layers respectively, revealed a better solar cell parameter. The variation of dopant concentration revealed that an increase in dopant concentration led to an increment in efficiency of the photovoltaic cell to 16.17%. Defect density increase led to a decrease in diffusion length indicating augmented recombination rate. Therefore, the optimized solar cell gave an efficiency of 16.17% suggesting good material for fabrication for photovoltaic applications.

Data availability statement

Data is available in the supplementary file.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Nancy Obare: Writing – original draft. Wycliffe Isoe: Software. Amos Nalianya: Data curation. Maxwell Mageto: Supervision. Victor Odari: Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

I Nancy Obare.

Declare that we have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Marc Burgelman and colleagues at the University of Gent, Belgium, for the free distribution of the SCAPS-1D simulator. We are also grateful to Uppsala University for sponsorship to MSSEESA conferences.

References

  • 1.Ghorbani E. On the efficiency of earth-abundant chalcogenide photovoltaic materials buffered with CdS: the limiting effect of band alignment. JPhys Energy. 2020;2(2) doi: 10.1088/2515-7655/ab6942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Benami A. Effect of CZTS parameters on photovoltaic solar cell from numerical simulation. J. Energy Power Eng. 2019;13 doi: 10.17265/1934-8975/2019.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rabhi A., Mounir K., Rezig B. Growth and vacuum post-annealing effect on the properties of the new absorber CuSbS 2 thin films. Mater. Lett. - MATER LETT. 2008;62:3576–3578. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Septina W., Ikeda S., Iga Y., Harada T., Matsumura M. Thin film solar cell based on CuSbS2 absorber fabricated from an electrochemically deposited metal stack. Thin Solid Films. 2014;550:700–704. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yang B., et al. CuSbS2 as a promising earth-abundant photovoltaic absorber material: a combined theoretical and experimental study. Chem. Mater. 2014;26(10):3135–3143. doi: 10.1021/cm500516v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Macías C., et al. Thin film solar cell based on CuSbS2 absorber prepared by chemical bath deposition (CBD) Mater. Res. Bull. 2017;87:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.11.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Olopade M., Adewoyin A., Chendo M., Bolaji A. 2018. The Study of Some Materials as Buffer Layer in Copper Antimony Sulphide (CuSbS 2) Solar Cell Using SCAPS 1-D. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wang L., et al. CuSbS2 solar cells using CdS, In2S3 and the in/Cd-based hybrid buffers. J. Electron. Mater. 2021;50 doi: 10.1007/s11664-021-08815-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sadanand, Dwivedi D.K. Modeling of CZTSSe solar photovoltaic cell for window layer optimization. Optik. 2020;222 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu Y., et al. Solution-processed CuSbS2 solar cells based on metal–organic molecular solution precursors. J. Mater. Sci. 2018;53 doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1663-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burgelman M., Nollet P., Degrave S. Modeling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cell. Thin Solid Films. 2000;361:527–532. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hossain M.K., Rubel M.H.K., Toki G.F.I., Alam I., Rahman Md F., Bencherif H. Effect of various electron and hole transport layers on the performance of CsPbI3-based perovskite solar cells: a numerical investigation in dft, SCAPS-1D, and wxAMPS frameworks. ACS Omega. 2022;7(47):43210–43230. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burgelman M., Nollet P., Degrave S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films. 2000;361–362:527–532. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nalianya M.A., et al. Numerical study of lead-free CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 perovskite solar cell by SCAPS-1D. Optik. 2021;248 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hossain M.K., et al. A comprehensive study of the optimization and comparison of cesium halide perovskite solar cells using ZnO and Cu2FeSnS4 as charge transport layers. New J. Chem. 2023;47(18):8602–8624. doi: 10.1039/D3NJ00320E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andersson, Johansson N., Johansson P., Yu N., Lupo D., Salaneck W.R. Fluorine tin oxide as an alternative to indium tin oxide in polymer LEDs. Adv. Mater. 1998;10(11):859–863. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Banu S., Cho Y., Kim K., Ahn S.K., Gwak J., Cho A. Phase transition behavior and defect analysis of CuSbS2 thin films for photovoltaic application prepared by hybrid inks. Sol. Energy. 2019;188:1209–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sadanand, Singh P.K., Rai S., Lohia P., Dwivedi D.K. Comparative study of the CZTS, CuSbS2 and CuSbSe2 solar photovoltaic cell with an earth-abundant non-toxic buffer layer. Sol. Energy. 2021;222:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.05.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meher S.R., Balakrishnan L., Alex Z.C. Analysis of Cu2ZnSnS4/CdS based photovoltaic cell: a numerical simulation approach. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016;100:703–722. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Perniu D., Duta A., Schoonman J. 2006 International Semiconductor Conference. 2006. Defect chemistry of Cusbs2; pp. 245–248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Müller J., Rech B., Springer J., Vanecek M. TCO and light trapping in silicon thin film solar cells. Sol. Energy. 2004;77(6):917–930. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Isoe W., Mageto M., Maghanga C.M., Mwamburi M., Odari B., Awino C. Thickness dependence of window layer on CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3-X Cl X perovskite solar cell. Int. J. Photoenergy. 2020;2020:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2020/8877744. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nair M.T.S., Nair P.K. CuSbS2 thin film formed through annealing chemically deposited Sb2S3–CuS thin films. J. Cryst. Growth. Mar. 2001;223:399–406. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)00672-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bag A., Radhakrishnan R., Nekovei R., Jeyakumar R. Effect of the absorber layer, hole transport layer thicknesses, and its doping density on the performance of perovskite solar cells by device simulation. Sol. Energy. 2020;196:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salem M.S., Shaker A., Othman M.S., Al-Bagawia A.H., Fedawy M., Aleid G.M. Numerical analysis and design of high-performance HTL-free antimony sulfide solar cells by SCAPS-1D. Opt. Mater. 2022;123 doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hossain M.K., et al. Deep insights into the coupled optoelectronic and photovoltaic analysis of lead-free CsSnI3 perovskite-based solar cell using DFT calculations and SCAPS-1D simulations. ACS Omega. 2023;8(25):22466–22485. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available in the supplementary file.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES