Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1978 Feb;61(2):204–208. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.2.204

Time-dependent Changes in the Auxin Sensitivity of Coleoptile Segments

Apparent Sensory Adaptation 1

Mary Jo Vesper 1, Michael L Evans 1
PMCID: PMC1091832  PMID: 16660260

Abstract

When segments are excised from corn (Zea mays L.) coleoptiles they exhibit a very low rate of elongation for about 3.5 hours. A strong increase in growth rate (the spontaneous growth response) then occurs and persists for many hours. During the latent period preceding the spontaneous growth response there is an apparent increase with time in the sensitivity of the segments to indoleacetic acid (IAA). This increase in sensitivity is expressed as a 2- to 3-fold increase in the magnitude of the growth response to low levels of IAA and a 3-fold decrease in the latent period of the response during the first 3 hours following excision. A similar increase in sensitivity to low levels of IAA is noted if application of IAA is timed from the point of termination of a previous exposure to the hormone. Since the increase in responsiveness to low levels of IAA is not paralleled by an increase in the rate of uptake of the hormone, the data may be interpreted as evidence for a type of time-dependent sensory adaptation to auxin. The IAA dose-response relationship also changes with time, and there is indirect evidence that an auxin-dependent inhibitor may influence the expression of the apparent sensory adaptation to auxin.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergman K., Burke P. V., Cerdá-Olmedo E., David C. N., Delbrück M., Foster K. W., Goodell E. W., Heisenberg M., Meissner G., Zalokar M. Phycomyces. Bacteriol Rev. 1969 Mar;33(1):99–157. doi: 10.1128/br.33.1.99-157.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dela Fuente R. K., Leopold A. C. Time course of auxin stimulations of growth. Plant Physiol. 1970 Aug;46(2):186–189. doi: 10.1104/pp.46.2.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans M. L., Ray P. M. Timing of the auxin response in coleoptiles and its implications regarding auxin action. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Jan;53(1):1–20. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans M. L., Schmitt M. R. The nature of spontaneous changes in growth rate in isolated coleoptile segments. Plant Physiol. 1975 Apr;55(4):757–762. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.4.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Macdowall F. D., Sirois J. C. Importance of Time after Excision and of pH on the Kinetics of Response of Wheat Coleoptile Segments to Added Indoleacetic Acid. Plant Physiol. 1977 Mar;59(3):405–410. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.3.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES