Abstract
Background
Despite the fact that hyperglycemic crisis poses a significant threat to the health care systems of developing countries like Ethiopia, there is a dearth of reliable data regarding the poor treatment outcome and associated factors among hyperglycemic emergencies in Ethiopia. Therefore, this review aimed to assess poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia.
Methods
Published articles regarding poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia were extensively searched from PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and African journal online. After extraction, data were exported to Stata software version 11 (Stata Corp LLC, TX, USA) for analysis. Statistically, the Cochrane Q-test and I2 statistics were used to determine the presence or absence of heterogeneity.
Results
3650 duplicates were eliminated from the 4291 papers (PubMed [18], Google scholar (1170), African journal online [21], and Cochrane library (3082)). The pooled estimate of poor treatment outcome among hyperglycemic emergencies in Ethiopia is found to be 16.21% (95% CI: 11.01, 21.41, P < 0.001). Creatinine level >1.2 mg/dl, stroke, sepsis and comorbidity were associated factors of poor treatment outcome.
Conclusion
Poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients was found to be high. Poor treatment outcome was predicted for those patients who had creatinine level >1.2 mg/dl, stroke, sepsis and comorbidity. As a result, we recommend healthcare providers to monitor thoroughly and have close follow-ups for patients with the identified predictors to improve poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises
Keywords: Hyperglycemic emergencies, Poor treatment outcome, Systematic review, Ethiopia
Introduction
Approximately 5 million people have died from diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide in the previous ten years due to the disease's sharp increase in prevalence [1]. Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic condition described by elevated blood glucose level results from abnormality of insulin secretion, insulin action, or both [2]. World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 report stated that 1.6 million fatalities were occurred as a result of diabetes related complications. Hyperglycemic emergencies (HGEs) are becoming the main life-threatening metabolic complications leads to significant diabetes-related morbidity, mortality, and medical expenses [3,4]. Untreated DM can lead to potentially fatal acute complications such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) requiring intensive treatment and hospitalization [5]. Diabetic ketoacidosis occurs in type 1 and HHS most often occurs in type 2 diabetes; however, each type of diabetes may be associated with DKA or HHS [6]. These complications typically result in impairment, shortened life expectancy, and high health expenses [7]. According to Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report, the annual hospitalization rate of adults with diabetes in the United States has been continuously rising, with 9.7 hospitalizations per 1000 persons as a result of HGEs [8].
Hyperglycemic emergencies represent almost 12% of diabetes-related hospitalizations in Africa [9]. Many research conducted across the world have revealed that the mortality rates of hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) ranges from 10 to 20% and 2–5%, respectively, with the highest premature death reported in Ethiopia and other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa [[10], [11], [12]]. The hyperglycemic crisis in Africa was the primary cause of hospital admissions for diabetic patients, which ranged from roughly 26% in South Africa to 40% in Nigeria. Death rates also varied, from 7.5% in South Africa to 34% in Nigeria [[13], [14], [15]]. According to studies conducted in Ethiopia, 14.6% of patients with a history of diabetes had a hyperglycemic crisis, whereas 23.6–43% of patients had newly developed diabetes at the time of admission with a 30-day case fatality rate of 4.1% [11,16,17].
Lack of funding for non-communicable illnesses control, poor public healthcare service, inadequate health education, poor self-glycemic control, and a dearth of population-specific research and guidelines all contribute significantly to the rising burden of HGEs in sub-Saharan Africa [12,18]. Many nations have implemented various methods and preventive steps to improve poor treatment outcome, such as diabetes self-management education, raising awareness on the pathophysiology of hyperglycemic emergencies, and adopting hyperglycemic emergency treatment standard [19]. These methods, meanwhile, have not been applied well in Ethiopia. The prevention and management of hyperglycemic emergencies in Ethiopia are further complicated by the high cost and scarcity of treatment supplies, the existence of comorbid illnesses, improper insulin storage, medication non-adherence, electrolyte imbalance, and smoking habits [20,21].
According to many research conducted in different countries admission serum creatinine >1.2 mg/dl, co-morbidity, rural residents, medical history of stroke, shock on presentation, hypokalemia, severity, type 2 diabetes and sepsis were independent predictors of poor treatment outcome of HEs among diabetic patients [11,[22], [23], [24], [25]].
Despite the fact that hyperglycemic crisis poses a significant threat to the health care systems of developing countries like Ethiopia, there is a dearth of reliable data regarding the poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies in Ethiopia. The results of the review will be helpful to provide evidence based information to manage hyperglycemic crisis better, minimizing in-hospital mortality, and shortening hospital stays for hyperglycemic patients. Therefore, this review aimed to assess poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia.
2. Methods
2.1. Search strategy and database
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline was used to report this systematic review and meta-analysis [26] (Supplementary file). Published articles regarding poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia were extensively searched from the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and African journal online from November 20/2023 to January 16/2024 by two Authors (A.M. and W.C). To include many pertinent studies as possible, reference lists of eligible studies were also searched. The following Medical Science Heading (MeSH) terms were used to search studies from the aforementioned database: “treatment outcome” OR “mortality” OR “poor treatment outcome” AND “determinants” OR “predictors” OR “associated factors” OR “risk factors” AND “diabetic ketoacidosis” OR “hyperglycemic emergencies” OR “hyperglycemic hyperosmolar non-ketotic syndrome” and “Ethiopia”. EndNote X7 was utilized to handle article duplication.
2.2. Outcome of review
The review's outcome variable is the poor treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies and its associated factors among diabetic patients. The following operational definition was considered for the current review purpose. Good treatment outcome: those patients who showed improvement after treatment at discharge. Poor treatment outcome: those patients who left against medical advice, develop treatment complications, have long hospital stay or died in the hospital [20].
2.3. Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Any quantitative studies that reported the prevalence of treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies among patients with diabetes in Ethiopia, freely accessible articles and articles published in English language were the main focus of the inclusion criteria for this review. Studies carried out outside of Ethiopia, qualitative research, articles with restricted access, abstracts, case reports, and studies published in languages other than English were among the exclusion criteria.
2.4. Data extraction
Two authors (WCT, and AMZ) independently extracted the data using a standardized data extraction checklist on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The discrepancies between the two authors during data extraction were raised and managed by discussion. Standardized Microsoft Excel sheet template was used to extract the following data; corresponding authors name with publication year, study design, study population, study area/region, sample size, sampling technique, participants, prevalence of poor treatment outcome, and associated factors of poor treatment outcome. The extracted associated factors are selected based on the following criteria: 1) have similar operational definition in the primary studies 2) reported with similar measure of association 3) have similar direction of associated and reported in two and above studies. Critical analysis was done on the extracted data, and the results were narratively described.
2.5. Quality assessment
Three authors (YAF, GWA and GMB) evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, which allows evaluation of each article based on methodological quality, caliber of comparability, and excellence of outcome divided across eight specific items. Each item on the scale is scored from one point, except for comparability, which can be adapted to the specific topic of interest to score up to two points. Thus, the maximum score for each study is 9, with range of overall scores 0–3, 4–6, and 7–9, indicating low, moderate, and high risk of bias, respectively [27].
2.6. Statistical analysis
After extraction, data were exported to Stata software version 11 (Stata Corp LLC, TX, USA) for analysis. To visualize the heterogeneity between the studies, a forest plot was used, which reported the prevalence of poor treatment outcome at 95% confidence interval for each study, as well as the pooled prevalence of the combined studies. Statistically, the Cochrane Q-test and I2 statistics were used to determine the presence or absence of heterogeneity, based on the values of 0–40, 40–60, 60–90 and 90–100% indicated low, medium, substantial and high heterogeneity respectively [28]). A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the influence of single studies on pooled estimates. Publication bias (small study effect) was checked graphically using a funnel plot and statistically using Egger's regression test at the significance level of P < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Study selection and identification
3650 duplicates were eliminated from the total record of 4291 papers (PubMed [18], Google scholar (1170), African journal online [21], and Cochrane library (3082)). Additional 540 items were eliminated based on a review of the title and abstract. Lastly, 93 were eliminated because they were conducted out of Ethiopia, not conducted among diabetic patients and didn't report the outcome of interest i.e. prevalence of poor treatment outcome. Finally, the meta-analysis included 8 published articles (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of article selection for a systematic review and meta-analysis of poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
3.2. Characteristics of included studies
Four of the included studies were institutional based cross-sectional and the remaining were retrospective studies. The highest prevalence of poor treatment outcome is reported from Oromia region (26.2%) [20] and the least is from Addis Ababa (3.9 %) [22]. The included studies were conducted from different regions of the country; 2 from Addis Ababa [22,24], 3 from Oromia region [11,20,29], 1 from Eastern Ethiopia [25], 1 from Amhara region [23] and 1 from Tigray region [30]. Detailed characteristics of the included studies are presented in (Table 1).
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of included studies in the review of poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia.
| Author | Pub Year | Region | Study Design | Study Population | Sample size | Prevalence of poor treatment outcome | Quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desse et al. [11] | 2015 | Oromia | Retrospective | DM patients | 421 | 9.8% | Medium |
| Gebremedhin et al. [30] | 2021 | Tigray | Retrospective | DM patients | 589 | 15.5% | High |
| Mekonnen et al. [23] | 2022 | Amhara | Retrospective | DM patients | 388 | 4.4% | High |
| Dagim et al. [29] | 2019 | Oromia | Institutional based cross-sectional study | DM patients | 358 | 15.1% | Medium |
| Bacha et al. [24] | 2022 | Addis Ababa | Institutional based cross-sectional study | DM patients | 270 | 14.7% | High |
| Taye et al. [20] | 2021 | Oromia | Retrospective | DM patients | 236 | 12% | High |
| Tekeste et al. [25] | 2021 | Eastern Ethiopia | Institutional based cross-sectional study | DM patients | 352 | 17.8% | High |
| Derse et al. [22] | 2023 | Addis Ababa | Institutional based cross-sectional study | DM patients | 358 | 3.9% | High |
3.3. Quality of the included studies
From the total included studies, the quality assessment showed that about six (n = 75%) of the studies had high quality, and the remaining two (n = 25%) of studies had medium quality (Supplementary file).
3.4. Publication bias
Egger's regression intercept tests were also carried out to determine publication bias. Egger's test results, the absence of significant publication bias was declared objectively (P = 0.146) and using symmetrical observation of Funnel plot subjectively (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Funnel plot assessed for publication bias in the review of poor treatment outcome and associated factors of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
3.5. Meta-analysis
The pooled estimate of poor treatment outcome among hyperglycemic emergencies in Ethiopia is found to be 16.21% (95% CI: 11.01, 21.41). The meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity across the included studies with I2 = 100%, P < 0.001). As a result, random effect model was used to compute the pooled estimate of poor treatment outcome among hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Forest plot indicating pooled prevalence of poor treatment outcome hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
3.6. Associated factors of poor treatment outcome
A total of four common factors were identified to predict poor treatment outcome among hyperglycemic emergencies. They include creatinine level >1.2 mg/dl, stroke, sepsis and comorbidity. This meta-analysis found that creatinine level >1.2 mg/dl is associated with poor treatment outcome. The odds of poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises were 3.04 times higher in patients with serum creatinine >1.2 mg/dl compared to those with serum creatinine ≤1.2 mg/dl (POR = 3.04; 95% CI: 1.66–5.54). There was no heterogeneity between studies. Therefore we used fixed effects model (I2 = 0.00%, P-value <0.001) (Fig. 4). Patients with comorbidity had 2.83 times higher risk of poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises as compared to those without comorbidity (POR = 2.83; 95% CI: 0.10–77.54). There was heterogeneity between studies in the random effects model (I2 = 94%, P-value <0.001) (Fig. 5). In this review patients who had sepsis were 4.04 times more likely to poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises as compared to those who had no sepsis (POR = 4.04; 95% CI: 1.66–9.81). There was substantial heterogeneity between studies in the random effects model (I2 = 68.4%, P-value = 0.002) (Fig. 6). The likelihood of poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises was 4.16 times higher in patients with stroke as compared to those without stroke (POR = 4.16; 95% CI: 2.51–6.87). There was no heterogeneity between studies. Therefore fixed effect model was utilized (I2 = 0.0%, P-value<0.001) (Fig. 7).
Fig. 4.
Pooled association between serum creatinine >1.2 mg/dl and poor treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
Fig. 5.
Pooled association between comorbidity and poor treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
Fig. 6.
Pooled association between sepsis and poor treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
Fig. 7.
Pooled association between stroke and poor treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia (N = 8).
4. Discussion
In this review, we have reported the prevalence of poor treatment outcomes of patients for hyperglycemic emergencies in Ethiopia among diabetic patients. The pooled estimate of poor treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies among diabetic patients in Ethiopia is found to be 16.21% (95% CI: 11.01, 21.41, P < 0.001), which is consistent with the finding of Nigeria 16% [31]. But the finding is lower than a studies conducted in Nigeria 34% [13] and Cameroon 21.7% [32]. The discrepancies may be due to setting variations in the clinical presentation of patients and efficient detection and management of hyperglycemic crises, precipitating factors, and complications. In contrast in is higher in studies done in South Africa 7.5% [14], Nigeria 4.8% [33], Colombia 2.3% [34] and Thailand 8.5% [35], in Colombia, China, and Taiwan, that reported poor treatment outcome ranging from 2.27 to 10.6% [[36], [37], [38]]. This disparity might be due to a delayed diagnosis of DM and then present for medical attention after developing diabetes complications. And also it might be due to the absence of inpatient management protocol, and insufficient laboratory monitoring during treatment to monitor patient response in the primary study settings due to the relatively high number of medical personnel deployed in the management of these patients. The other justification for the higher prevalence of poor treatment outcome in our review might be due to in developing countries like Ethiopia patients have less access to diabetes screening and preventive services, low health care services, and increased treatment gaps. Likewise, patients are unaware of their glycemic state and then present for medical attention after developing diabetes complications and worsening of the conditions.
The odds of poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises were higher in patients with serum creatinine >1.2 mg/dl compared to those with serum creatinine ≤1.2 mg/dl. Similar finding is found from China and Taiwan [39,40]. Diabetes is recognized to negatively impact renal function, although the underlying pathophysiology is still unclear. It's uncertain if the damage is the result of end organ damage from atherosclerosis or the continuous hyperglycemia effect. There are theories that hyperglycemia might cause increment of oxidant levels, TGF-β, and NF-kappa B activation to rise, which can cause kidney damage and ultimately poor treatment outcome [41].
Patients with comorbidity had higher risk of poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises as compared to those without comorbidity. The finding is similar with the study done in Jordan and United Kingdom [42,43]. By impacting numerous body systems, co-morbidities can weaken the body's natural defense mechanism against diseases, complicate the clinical course of disease, and raise the severity of the disease.
In this review patients who had sepsis were more likely to poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises as compared to those who had no sepsis, which is consistent with the finding of China and United States [40,44]. This could be because sepsis is a potentially the cause for fatal organ failure brought on by an uncontrolled host reaction to an infection. Preclinical research shows that diabetes inhibits the adaptive immune system and affects a number of innate immune system components. Increased blood glucose levels and changes in the glycaemia-dependent immune response are present in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and these factors may have an impact on the pathophysiology and worse prognosis of sepsis in diabetic patients [45,46].
The likelihood of poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises was higher in patients with stroke as compared to those without stroke. The result is consistent with the study done in Jordan, China and United States [42,44,47]. This is justified by diabetes is a well-established risk factor for stroke. It can result in pathologic alterations in blood vessels in different parts of the bodies and, if cerebral vessels are directly damaged, can induce stroke. Additionally, stroke patients with uncontrolled glucose levels had worse post-stroke outcomes and in turn leads to poor treatment outcome in such patients [48].
4.1. Limitations
Selection bias in the estimation of prevalence may be introduced as many of the studies included in the meta-analysis recruited participants from hospitals. Moreover, this meta-analysis represented only studies reported from some regions of Ethiopia, which could affect the estimated prevalence reported. In addition, the majority of the research that were chosen for the final analysis were limited to a few parts of Ethiopia, meaning that they do not accurately represent the remaining regions. Finally, only English language articles were reviewed, potentially overlooking valuable publications in other languages.
5. Conclusion
Poor treatment outcome from HGEs among diabetic patients was found to be high. Poor treatment outcome was predicted for those patients who had creatinine level >1.2 mg/dl, stroke, sepsis and comorbidity. To improve poor treatment outcome from hyperglycemic crises, we advise healthcare personnel to closely monitor and evaluate on patients who have the above identified predictors. Additionally, we advise including diabetes screening in health extension packaging initiatives and extending diabetes care services to basic healthcare facilities. Physicians should also detect and manage precipitants of HGEs and co-morbidities early at initial patient presentation. Furthermore, improving the inpatient management protocol of hyperglycemic crisis and equipped advanced laboratory investigations is mandatory.
Funding
Not applicable since the study is systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval not applicable for this systematic review and meta-analysis study.
Informed consent not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Gashaw Melkie Bayeh: Data curation, Visualization, Review of final draft. Yeshiwas Ayale Ferede: Data curation, Visualization, Review of final draft. Agerie Mengistie Zeleke: Data curation, Visualization, Review of final draft.
Declaration of competing interest
We, the authors of this article declare that we have no any competing interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the authors of the included primary studies, which used as source of information to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2024.100275.
Contributor Information
Worku Chekol Tassew, Email: workukid16@gmail.com.
Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Email: megashaw21@gmail.com.
Yeshiwas Ayale Ferede, Email: yeshiwas981@gmail.com.
Agerie Mengistie Zeleke, Email: ageriemengistie21@gmail.com.
Abbreviations
- CI
Confidence interval
- DM
Diabetes mellitus
- DKA
Diabetic Keto-Acidosis
- HHNS
Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Non-ketotic Syndrome
- HGEs
Hyperglycemic Emergencies
- POR
Pooled Odds Ratio
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Saeedi P., Petersohn I., Salpea P., Malanda B., Karuranga S., Unwin N., et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157 doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brunner L.S. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Garcia-Garcia G., Jha V., Tao Li P.K., Garcia-Garcia G., Couser W.G., Erk T., et al. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in disadvantaged populations. Clinical kidney journal. 2015;8(1):3–6. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Desai D., Mehta D., Mathias P., Menon G., Schubart U.K. Health care utilization and burden of diabetic ketoacidosis in the US over the past decade: a nationwide analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(8):1631–1638. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kitabchi A.E., Umpierrez G.E., Murphy M.B., Barrett E.J., Kreisberg R.A., Malone J.I., et al. Hyperglycemic crises in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:S109. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Omrani G.R., Shams M., Afkhamizadeh M., Kitabchi A. 2005. Hyperglycemic crises in diabetic patients. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Odili U., Okwuanasor E. Estimating the cost of diabetes hospitalization in a secondary health care facility. Niger J Pharm Sci. 2012;11(1):49–57. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Control CfD, Prevention . US Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA: 2014. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarfo-Kantanka O., Sarfo F.S., Oparebea Ansah E., Eghan B., Ayisi-Boateng N.K., Acheamfour-Akowuah E. Secular trends in admissions and mortality rates from diabetes mellitus in the central belt of Ghana: a 31-year review. PLoS One. 2016;11(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goguen J., Gilbert J. Committee DCCPGE Hyperglycemic emergencies in adults. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42:S109–S114. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Desse T.A., Eshetie T.C., Gudina E.K. Predictors and treatment outcome of hyperglycemic emergencies at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, southwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1495-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pastakia S.D., Pekny C.R., Manyara S.M., Fischer L. Diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa–from policy to practice to progress: targeting the existing gaps for future care for diabetes. Diabetes, Metab Syndrome Obes Targets Ther. 2017:247–263. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S126314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ogbera A.O., Awobusuyi J., Unachukwu C., Fasanmade O. Clinical features, predictive factors and outcome of hyperglycaemic emergencies in a developing country. BMC Endocr Disord. 2009;9:1–5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-9-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pepper D., Burch V., Levitt N., Cleary S. Hyperglycaemic emergency admissions to a secondary-level hospital—an unnecessary financial burden. J Endocrinol Metabol Diabetes S Afr. 2007;12(2):56–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Olugbemide O., Bankole I., Akhuemokhan K., Adunbiola P. Clinical profile and outcome of hyperglycaemic emergencies at a rural hospital in southern Nigeria. African Journal of Diabetes Medicine. 2017;25(2) [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bedaso A., Oltaye Z., Geja E., Ayalew M. Diabetic ketoacidosis among adult patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to emergency unit of Hawassa university comprehensive specialized hospital. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4186-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abegaz T.M., Mekonnen G.A., Gebreyohannes E.A., Gelaye K.A. Treatment outcome of diabetic ketoacidosis among patients atending general hospital in north-West Ethiopia: hospital based study. bioRxiv. 2018 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hall V., Thomsen R.W., Henriksen O., Lohse N. Diabetes in Sub Saharan Africa 1999-2011: epidemiology and public health implications. a systematic review. BMC Publ Health. 2011;11(1):564. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Benoit S.R., Zhang Y., Geiss L.S., Gregg E.W., Albright A. Trends in diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalizations and in-hospital mortality—United States, 2000–2014. MMWR (Morb Mortal Wkly Rep) 2018;67(12):362. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6712a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Taye G.M., Bacha A.J., Taye F.A., Bule M.H., Tefera G.M. Diabetic ketoacidosis management and treatment outcome at medical ward of Shashemene Referral Hospital, Ethiopia: a retrospective study. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2021;14 doi: 10.1177/11795514211004957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tiruneh T., Shiferaw E., Enawgaw B. Prevalence and associated factors of anemia among full-term newborn babies at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0764-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Derse T.K., Haile M.T., Chamiso T.M. Outcome of diabetic Keto acidosis treatment and associated factors among adult patients admitted to emergency and medical wards at st. Paul's hospital, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2023: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity. 2023:3471–3480. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S432220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mekonnen G.A., Gelaye K.A., Gebreyohannes E.A., Abegaz T.M. Treatment outcomes of diabetic ketoacidosis among diabetes patients in Ethiopia. Hospital-based study. PLoS One. 2022;17(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bacha T., Shiferaw Y., Abebaw E. Outcome of diabetic ketoacidosis among paediatric patients managed with modified DKA protocol at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital and Yekatit 12 hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. 2022;5(5):e363. doi: 10.1002/edm2.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Asfaw T.P., Binega M.G., Asmamaw M.A., Molla T.B. Treatment outcome and predictors of mortality among adult diabetic patients admitted with hyperglycemic crises at hiwot fana comprehensive specialized university hospital, eastern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Health and Biomedical Sciences. 2021;5(2):45–52. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Luchini C., Stubbs B., Solmi M., Veronese N. Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. World Journal of Meta-Analysis. 2017;5(4):80–84. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Higgins J.P., Green S. 2008. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. [Google Scholar]
- 29.al DAKe Diabetic ketoacidosis treatment outcome and associated factors among adult patients admitted to medical wards of adama hospital medical college, Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Intern Med. 2019;6(2):34–42. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gebremedhin G., Enqueselassie F., Yifter H., Deyessa N. Hyperglycemic crisis characteristics and outcome of care in adult patients without and with a history of diabetes in Tigrai, Ethiopia: comparative study. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity. 2021:547–556. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S275552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Adesina O., Kolawole B., Ikem R., Adebayo O., Soyoye D. Comparison of lispro insulin and regular insulin in the management of hyperglycaemic emergencies. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2011;40(1):59–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nkoke C., Bain L.E., Makoge C., Teuwafeu D., Mapina A., Nkouonlack C., et al. Profile and outcomes of patients admitted with hyperglycemic emergencies in the Buea Regional Hospital in Cameroon. Pan African medical journal. 2021;39(1) doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.274.14371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ezeani I., Eregie A., Ogedengbe O. Treatment outcome and prognostic indices in patients with hyperglycemic emergencies. Diabetes, Metab Syndrome Obes Targets Ther. 2013:303–307. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S44477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Builes-Montaño C.E., Chavarriaga A., Ballesteros L., Muñoz M., Medina S., Donado-Gomez J.H., et al. Characteristics of hyperglycemic crises in an adult population in a teaching hospital in Colombia. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2018;17:143–148. doi: 10.1007/s40200-018-0353-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Anthanont P., Khawcharoenporn T., Tharavanij T. Incidences and outcomes of hyperglycemic crises: a 5-year study in a tertiary care center in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thail. 2012;95(8):995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chaithongdi N., Subauste J.S., Koch C.A., Geraci S.A. Diagnosis and management of hyperglycemic emergencies. Hormones (Basel) 2011;10:250–260. doi: 10.14310/horm.2002.1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chou W., Chung M.H., Wang H.Y., Chen J.H., Chen W.L., Guo H.R., et al. Clinical characteristics of hyperglycemic crises in patients without a history of diabetes. Journal of diabetes investigation. 2014;5(6):657–662. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bragg F., Holmes M.V., Iona A., Guo Y., Du H., Chen Y., et al. Association between diabetes and cause-specific mortality in rural and urban areas of China. JAMA. 2017;317(3):280–289. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang C.-C., Chou W., Lin H.-J., Chen S.-C., Kuo S.-C., Chen W.-L., et al. Cancer history, bandemia, and serum creatinine are independent mortality predictors in patients with infection-precipitated hyperglycemic crises. BMC Endocr Disord. 2013;13(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-13-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jiang L., Cheng M. Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of patients with sepsis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndrome. 2022;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00803-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Patschan D., Müller G.A. Acute kidney injury in diabetes mellitus. International journal of nephrology. 2016;2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/6232909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mayyas F.A., Ibrahim K.S. Predictors of mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes in Jordan. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00866-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hussain S., Chowdhury T.A. The impact of comorbidities on the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2019;79(3):231–242. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-1061-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Korbel L., Spencer J.D. Diabetes mellitus and infection: an evaluation of hospital utilization and management costs in the United States. J Diabetes Complicat. 2015;29(2):192–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Carlos D., Spiller F., Souto F.O., Trevelin S.C., Borges V.F., de Freitas A., et al. Histamine h2 receptor signaling in the pathogenesis of sepsis: studies in a murine diabetes model. J Immunol. 2013;191(3):1373–1382. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang Z., Ren J., Wang G., Liu Q., Guo K., Li J. Association between diabetes mellitus and outcomes of patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Mon Int Med J Exp Clin Res : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2017;23:3546–3555. doi: 10.12659/MSM.903144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen R., Ovbiagele B., Feng W. Diabetes and stroke: epidemiology, pathophysiology, pharmaceuticals and outcomes. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351(4):380–386. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.







