Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2024 Feb 26;9(9):10017–10029. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09547

Degradation Efficiency of Organic Dyes on CQDs As Photocatalysts: A Review

Zulkifle Ikram †,*, Esha Azmat , Muhammad Perviaz
PMCID: PMC10918811  PMID: 38463277

Abstract

graphic file with name ao3c09547_0017.jpg

Across the globe, the task of providing clean and safe drinking water is getting harder. Organic contaminants, including dyes and pharmaceutical medications, are a significant environmental threat, especially in aquatic bodies due to their uncontrolled emission. Therefore, a method for their degradation in water bodies that is both environmentally friendly and commercially feasible must be developed. In the realm of photocatalysis, carbon-based nanomaterials have drawn more attention in the last ten years. Due to their exceptional and distinct qualities, metal-free carbon-based photocatalytic systems have received a lot of attention recently for their ability to degrade organic contaminants into semiconductor quantum dots, which are already available. A class of nanomaterials with a particle size between 2 and 10 nm showing distinct optoelectrical characteristics is among the variety of catalytic quantum dots. This review covers several synthesis techniques such as electrochemical, laser ablation, microwave radiation, hydrothermal, and optical features of CQDs such as the photoluminescent (PL) property and quantum confinement effect. The uses of CQDs in the degradation of various dyes as well as the difficulties that still exist and the opportunities that lie ahead have also been explored.

Introduction

Undoubtedly, environmental contamination is a major issue in today’s society.1 Untreated waste is released into water bodies by industries like pulp, plastic, paper, and textiles.2 Aquatic environments frequently contain harmful chemicals such as textile dyes, pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, and surfactants.1 This waste frequently contains significant volumes of organic dyes, which are usually nonbiodegradable and exhibit higher stability in the presence of light and high temperatures, leading to detrimental effects on the environment.3 The removal of organic compounds requires highly efficient, stable, and reasonably priced photocatalysts to meet the growing demand to protect the environment. Pollutant dyes are hazardous to human health and the environment, thus eliminating them from wastewater is crucial because of their tenacity.4 Most of the dyes have one or more benzene rings, which are poisonous and resistant to degradation by microorganisms. If neglected, they have the potential to permanently damage the ecosystem by increasing the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and blocking sunlight from entering the water’s depths, which negatively affects aquatic life.5

Need for Sustainable Development

Given the finite amount of water resources and the ever-increasing population that depends on them, water scarcity is a major environmental concern. Access to energy, a clean environment, and clean water are essential conditions for both human survival and economic advancement.6 The adoption of ecosystem-friendly techniques to promote a sustainable environment is the key to combat this contamination and meet the unavoidable industrial demand for synthetic dyes. In this quest, scientists have investigated environmentally benign techniques, taking traditional, physical, and chemical treatment methods into account, such as desalination, membrane filtration, chemical separation, adsorption on activated carbon, coagulation, flocculation, precipitation, etc. These methods, however, have some restrictions as they may result in incomplete degradation and the production of secondary pollutants.2 One extremely promising area holding significant potential for the advancement of sustainability is nanotechnology. This is a field that continues to mature and has helped tremendously in the development of innovative substances and applications that have paved the way for mankind toward a better, brighter future. Nanochemistry is mainly associated with designing newer materials at a molecular scale having novel properties and functionalities enabling the materials to have new ground-breaking applications.7

Quantum Dots (QDs)

A family of nanomaterials known as quantum dots (QDs) comprises particles ranging between 2 and 10 nm in size. They are materials in which the excitons, i.e., the charge pair of a positive hole and the negatively charged electron are constrained in all three spatial dimensions by electrostatic forces.8 Their electrical and optical properties are highly tunable. The properties of QDs deviate significantly from their bulk counterparts if their size becomes less than the electrons of the de Broglie wavelength present in the dot. This effect is known as the quantum confinement effect.9 The development of semiconductor QDs with controllable and confined emission spectrum characteristics due to the quantum confinement effect is seen as a big breakthrough. However, due to them being nonbiocompatible and highly toxic, early conventional QDs like Zn/Se QDs, Ag2S QDs, Pb/Se QDs, and Cd/Se QDs are considered to be an environmental hazard. Carbon is one of the most abundant and environmentally friendly elements found on the Earth. The recent development in the field of carbonaceous QDs as substitutes for semiconductor QDs has sparked intense research attention.10

Carbon Quantum Dots (CQDs)

Carbon-based quantum dots have received significant attention because of their exceptional optical, mechanical, and electrical properties. CQDs are a subtype of nanoparticles that are smaller than 10 nm in size11,12 and are usually zero-dimensional, sp2 hybridized carbon nanomaterials exhibiting affinity for oxygen-bearing functionality like carboxylic and hydroxyl groups on their surface.7 Unlike other semiconductors, CQDs are low cost and show excellent photostability, low toxicity, chemical inertness, and ease of functionalization with other photocatalysts (such as Ag3PO4, TiO2, and Fe2O3), which allows them to absorb a wide range of light photons, which is the key requisite for photocatalysis.13,14 These CQDs are known for their high water solubility and biocompatibility; furthermore, they cause almost no cytotoxicity,15 which makes them a good candidate for modern applications focusing on sustainable developmental goals.

CQDs not only have the electrical properties that are associated with nanoparticles, i.e., the bandgap tuning and electronic transitions, but also possess distinctive optical characteristics including very sharp fluorescence.16 As the fluorescence is size dependent because of the quantum limiting effect, the smaller CQDs show blue fluorescence which is a smaller wavelength but bigger sizes show fluorescence way up even in the IR region of the electromagnetic radiations.17 Surface passivation is another key aspect when it comes to CQDs and the modifiability of these CQDs is unparalleled. Different functional groups on the CQDs surface lead to different interactions with the substrates and hence, they have found their application in being biosensors,18 catalysts,19 biomaging,20 contrasting agents,21 drug delivery agents,22 and even optoelectronics23 such as photovoltaic cells and LEDs.24

CQDs are one of the materials that can be produced by using a whole world of materials, as long as they can act as a carbon precursor. Some of these materials are low cost such as citric acid,25 proteins, and carbohydrates; but can also be produced from waste materials such as bagasse of Sugar cane,26 Sugar cane juice,27,28 peels of fruits and vegetables,26 nuts,2931 other organic32 and plastic waste,33,34 juices of fruits and vegetables.26 It can even be produced from ashes.32 The process of removal of water and then the occurrence of carbonization under extreme temperature and pressure conditions, followed by the passivation of the CQDs surface is the usual approach for CQDs synthesis using a natural source.35 Some other precursors include carbonaceous nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes,19 graphene, or bulk molecules such as graphite and coal.22 In this regard it will not be wrong to say it can be synthesized from any possible organic material one can find lying around.18

Photocatalysis

The long-term viability of solar energy makes photocatalysis an attractive solution to the energy crisis. Using various types of catalysts, solar energy can be harvested, and this energy is absorbed by materials of different kinds to undergo electronic transitions. The excitation of electrons results in a charge pair (an electron in the conduction band and a hole generated in the valence band).36 This charge pair created in the catalyst results in the breakdown of different organic and inorganic pollutants as the excited electron gets transferred to the substrate causing a chain of various chemical reactions and turning the substrate e.g., organic dyes into smaller nonharmful constituents such as water and carbon dioxide.37 Metal semiconductors are the most widely used photocatalysts; however, certain metals, such as Pb and Co, are hazardous to human health and the environment. Consequently, photocatalysts with no metals, such as graphene QDs, carbon QDs, and carbon nitrite QDs, have garnered significant attention.

Carbonaceous Photocatalysts

Carbon materials of different types such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon nanofibers (CNFs), hydrochar, and graphene have been studied throughout the years to show photocatalytic properties.36 Although these carbon materials have the electronic properties to act as catalysts, the photocatalytic activity shown by them is quite low. CNTs and CNFs are remarkable when it comes to conduction and absorption abilities and naturally act as very good charge transfer materials by absorbing energy, which is in electromagnetic radiation form and results in catalysis. However, these materials require some metals or other chemical species to be paired up with them by creating a synergic effect.38,39 Hydrochar is similar to CNTs and CNFs in this nature and shows catalytic performance after pairing up with good semiconductor materials or light-sensitive nanoparticles.40 Sometimes, hydrochar, CNTs, and CNFs are to be modified with different functionalities such as doping with nitrogen and sulfur to amplify the band separation, resulting in better catalytic performance.39 Only graphene and graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles are found to have photocatalytic properties worth considering when used in their pristine form. Graphene and graphene oxide nanoparticles are also doped and paired with various other materials to increase the performance of catalysis; however, Ahuja et al.41 studied the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using pristine graphene oxide nanoparticles, along with its composite with polyaniline and NiO. Ahuja reported that the pristine reduced GO nanoparticles degraded 32% of methylene blue in 100 min, while the composite of NiO-polyaniline-RGO showed 98% degradation in only 11 min.41 The GO being a carbonaceous material also follows a similar rule, and the catalytic activity is enhanced by doping of GO with various other elements. Mukhtar et al. reported that GO in pristine form can be doped with materials like nitrogen and boron. The nitrogen-doped GO (NGO) degraded 93% methylene blue in 150 min, while the boron-doped GO (BGO) and nitrogen and boron-doped GO (NBGO) showed 38% and 25% degradation, respectively.42

CQDs as Photocatalyst

Carbon QDs are a zero-dimensional conductive material that exhibits good size effects and electrical conductivity. Because their surface is highly modifiable with required functional groups, semiconductors can be paired with CQDs to get the appropriate band positions, which will result in an efficiency boost of photocatalysis. Furthermore, carbon QDs have a great adsorption capacity for reactants, because of their excellent surface area specificity and surface functional groups abundance, which supports the interaction of the substrate with the catalyst and hence, the photocatalytic process.10

CQDs show a quantum confinement effect and hence show unique optical properties which conventional nanomaterials do not possess. This very quality sets them apart from the rest of the carbonaceous nanomaterials. Furthermore, because of the large surface area to volume ratio, it can be more functionalized with groups that both increase the interaction of the substrate and increase the band separation, as already discussed when addressing other nanomaterials. CQDs also show photoluminescence and emit light once they are excited and undergo electronic transitions. This allows the CQDs to have a quantum yield, a property no other carbonaceous material has shown so far. This crucial property along with photoluminescence allows the CQDs to show more photocatalytic activity than conventional materials, as it allows CQDs to emit light in a process where the utilization and absorption of light are essential. As the QDs are still nanoparticles, they retain the good properties of nanomaterials such as the bandgap tunability which makes the CQDs just as tunable as other materials and the properties of CQDs making them suitable photocatalysts are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photocatalytic properties of CQD.

A range of synthesis procedures, such as the hydrothermal/solvothermal approach, chemical ablation, laser ablation, and pyrolysis, have gradually been explored for CQD production.43 However, different synthesis processes come with pros and cons of their own.

This thorough review attempts to give the reader a better understanding of carbon quantum dots by summarizing the ideas of synthesis, characterization, applications in photocatalysis as a decontaminant (dye removal), drawbacks and unfilled research requirements, and possible prospects for future development.

Synthesis Methods

The techniques for the synthesis of CQDs are classified into two categories: “top-down” and “bottom-up” approaches. In the first type, coal, graphene oxide (GO), carbon nanotubes, graphene, graphite powder, and other carbonaceous materials are broken down via physical, chemical, or electrochemical processes, leading to CQDs as represented in Figure 2. The bottom-up strategies are based on chemical synthesis and use pyrolysis as well as reactions that will result in the carburization of simple organic compounds.44 In this section, the most widely used techniques for the synthesis of CQDs are explored in detail.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Synthetic approaches for CQDs. Modified and reprinted with permission from ref (45). Copyright 2018 Elsevier.

Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Method

The hydrothermal method, which involves a customized autoclave for building pressure and heating of a reaction system, is a top-down method for synthesizing catalysts. Precursors are dissolved, and desired products are synthesized in an environment with relatively high temperature and pressure that is created using an aqueous solution. Because of its high specificity, ease of use, good selectivity, high accuracy, and outstanding reproducibility, this method is the most widely used to prepare CQDs.10 It is an inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and nontoxic technique, that is capable of employing a variety of carbon precursors, including glucose, sucrose, maltol, chitosan, citric acid, banana juice, and orange juice.44 This method is also known to produce CQDs having multiple sizes, which can be further separated using dialysis and centrifugation at different speeds. Sahu et al. used orange juice to prepare CQD showing high photoluminescence with a quantum yield of 26% in a single step using hydrothermal carbonization and centrifuged the mixture that was left over46 as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hydrothermal Method for CQDs synthesis.

Other organic solvents with higher boiling points, such as benzene, dimethylformamide, and dimethyl sulfoxide, are utilized in place of water in the solvothermal process. Carbon sources are usually dissolved in these types of solvents, after which they undergo heat treatment at high temperatures, extraction, and concentration.44

Chemical Ablation

In this method, the carbonaceous materials are carbonized into smaller molecules using strong oxidizing acids, and these molecules can be specifically cleaved into much smaller sheets using oxidation in a controlled environment.47 Peng and Travas-Sejdic demonstrated a way to produce CQDs in the presence of water by first exposing carbohydrates to concentrated sulfuric acid which results in dehydration, followed by the treatment with nitric acid resulting in the formation of individual CQDs by the breakage of carbonaceous source and finally modifying CQDs with amine-terminated compounds (4,7,10-trioxa-1,13-tridecanediamine).48

Laser Ablation

One of the most widely used production method for carbon-derived nanomaterials is laser ablation, which involves the ablation of solid target materials using a high-energy laser beam. For the evaporation of the substance, a large quantity of energy is focused at one specific location on a solid surface during this process which is shown in Figure 4. This approach can produce exceedingly pure particles, as the purity of the final output is essentially determined by the purity of the media being used and the precursor acting as the target in this process. Cao et al. synthesized pure CQDs using laser ablation.4951 The laser ablation process was carried out using carbonaceous materials as a target while having argon, performing as the carrier gas, and H2O vapors present under 75 kPa at 900 °C. CQDs were produced and further modified with organic polymers and 12 h of refluxing in HNO3.4951

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Laser Ablation Method for CQDs synthesis

Electrochemical Carbonization

One of the most popular technique for producing CQDs using various bulk carbon sources as precursors is the electrochemical method. Typically, an electrolyte consisting of water is submerged in two electrodes made of carbon which can also be seen in Figure 5. Water electrolysis and the formation of H and OH radicals on the electrodes are facilitated by applying redox potential, and the electrode defects work as electrochemical scissors to generate CQDs. This technology has several advantages, i.e., it is cost-effective, can be produced in large quantities, and is nontoxic and simple and easy to use.44

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Electrochemical Synthesis of CQDs.

Zhang et al. reported a method of synthesizing CQDs by using alcohols having low molecular weight and carbonizing them using an electrochemical cell. As the working and auxiliary electrodes, they used two Pt sheets. The reference calomel electrode was fixed to a Luggin capillary that could be adjusted. Once the alcohols were electrochemically carbonized in a basic environment, they were converted into CQDs. As the applied potential increases, the CQD sizes and graphitization degrees also increases.52

Microwave Irradiation Synthesis/Pyrolysis Method

Several methods have been developed to generate CDs, but most of them are mainly labor-intensive and require specialized equipment. Therefore, a uniform heating technique that is easy to use, quick, and selective is crucial for large-scale synthesis. All of these objectives are achieved by the microwave (MW) irradiation/pyrolysis technique, which allows large-scale and quick manufacturing.44 The diagram is shown in Figure 6. High temperatures are used in microwave-assisted method to force molecules to recombine and reorganize, creating completely new compounds. This bottom-up approach is hence used to combine extremely microscopic substances and turn them into relatively macroscopic moieties, however, still being in the nano range.10

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Pyrolysis or Microwave assisted CQD synthesis.

Zhai et al. examined the production of CQDs using citric acid by microwave irradiation utilizing variety of amine functionality-containing compounds, including ethylenediamine and thiourea. The performance of the CQDs was enhanced by the molecules having primary amines in their structure, which resulted in them acting both, as surface passivating agents and N-doping starting material.53

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Synthesis Method

The summary of all the pros and cons of different methods used to synthesize CQDs are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Pros and Cons of Different Methods Employed to Produce CQDs.

Methods Advantages Disadvantages References
Hydrothermal/solvothermal Highly specific Reaction is slow and time-consuming (10)
Easy to operate
Highly selective
Extremely accurate Yield is low
Reproducible product
Nontoxic Required reaction conditions are harsh
Size controllability
Chemical ablation Easily available Reaction conditions are harsh (47)
Rigorous and extreme modification
Can be done using a number of sources A number of steps
Size is not controllable
Laser ablation Facile and rapid synthesis Low quantum yield (44,47)
Cost effective Size not controllable
Eco- friendly
Scalable Surface modification is essential
Monodispersed concerning size
Electrochemical carbonization Various types of starting material Few small molecule precursors (44)
controllable size
One-step and facile Complicated operation
High purity
Stable product Tedious purification process
High yield
Microwave irradiation synthesis/pyrolysis method Performance can be controlled Heat treatment with high temperature is required (10,44,47)
Highly efficient
Microstructure can be adjusted Low quantum yield
Readily available Poor size control
Time saving Post-modification needed
Highly economically efficient High cost and energy consumption

Photocatalytic Application for the Degradation of Dyes (MB)

For Wastewater Treatment

Photocatalysis is the acceleration of a chemical reaction by light in the presence of a catalyst.14 The majority of photocatalyzed reactions use free radicals. It is a green and sustainable energy conversion method with significant applications in addressing environmental pollution and energy scarcity. One major problem was figuring out how to remove a wide range of toxins from wastewater by combining photocatalytic and adsorption approaches.1 The application of CQDs in photocatalysis has certain benefits. When it comes to low toxicity, chemical stability, and water solubility, CQDs surpass other common photocatalysts (such as ZnO, TiO2, and CdS).54

Degradation Of Methylene Blue (MB) Dye

Synthesis Procedure for CQD-Based Heterostructures

To degrade methylene blue (MB), several methods have been used to produce CQD-based heterostructures. Simply adding the CQDs as-prepared to the suspension of TiO2 microspheres allowed for the formation of CQDs/TiO2 heterostructures. Ascorbic acid was hydrothermally treated to yield CQDs for this purpose, which is represented in Figure 7.55

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Synthesis of CQDs/TiO2 Composite for MB degradation modified and reprinted from Ke et al. work.56 Copyright 2017, Elsevier

Mechanism

The proposed mechanism states that photogenerated electrons in the CQDs are moved to the TiO2 conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) when the nanocomposite is subjected to visible light. The mechanism is observed in Figure 8. Moreover, higher frequency photons produced by the up-conversion process in CQDs aid in the charge pair production in TiO2. The combined effects of these processes greatly increase the nanocomposite’s photoactivity.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Mechanism of MB degradation using CQDs/TiO2 composite. Modified and reprinted with permission from ref (56). Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

The mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of MB utilizing CQD/TiO2 as the photocatalyst is summarized below:57

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m001.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m002.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m003.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m004.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m005.jpg

Furthermore, by behaving as electron traps, CQDs are essential for enhancing the photoactivity of CQDs/TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalysts, which in turn causes the MB dye to degrade completely.55

CQDs as Photosensitizers

CQDs have been employed as photosensitizers for semiconductors like TiO2, and GQDs.55 TiO2 has an energy bandgap of about 3.1 eV.58 Ke et al. exploited the phenomenon by combining CQDs with TiO2 microspheres resulting in a remarkably high photocatalytic degradation of MB.56 This resulted in a nanocomposite showing 3.6 times more degradation than pristine TiO2 and degraded 90% of the MB. (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

CQDs used for the degradation of MB in recent years.

CQDs Nanocomposites

Semiconductors like TiO2 and SiO2 were paired up with CQDs to form nanocomposites, and the composite showed an effective and stable response in visible light for the breakdown of methylene blue (MB), an organic dye. After 25 min of exposure to a 300 W halogen lamp, the results indicated that the composites of TiO2 with CQDs and SiO2 with CQDs showed maximum degradation of dye and even reached up to 100% degradation. It was also noticed that the control comprising of pure CQDs, pure TiO2, and pure SiO2 respectively, showed minimum degradation and 0% dye degradation was observed.6

This outcome suggested two possibilities. First, photoexcited TiO2 or SiO2 is required for high-frequency photon emission resulting from photoluminescence up-conversion in CQDs. Second, the band position of CQDs created a synergic effect in which electron transfer took place between CQDs and their semiconductor counterparts in the composite. The photoluminescence up-conversion phenomenon in CQDs holds great potential in the context of creating smart visible light-active photocatalysts.7 The degradation of methylene blue carried out by different types of CQDs is reported in Table 2 and can also be observed in Figure 9.

Table 2. CQDs Used for the Degradation of MB in Recent Years.

Authors Year Nanovomposite Methods Degradation percentage (%) Time (min) Ref
Jin et al. 2023 N-CQDs/TiO2 Facile hydrothermal-calcination synthesis approach 93.1 60 (59)
Edakkaparamban et al. 2023 N-CQDs Hydrothermal treatment 94 150 (60)
Elmorsy et al. 2023 ZIF-8@N-CQDs/ZIF-67 Solvothermal methods 94 180 (61)
Imran et al. 2023 CQDs Solvothermal methods 92 60 (62)
Wang et al. 2021 CQDs/CeO2/SrFe12O19 The hydrothermal method and gamma-ray-assisted polyacrylamide gel method 91.5 240 (63)
Abbasi et al. 2023 Undoped bare CQDs Pyrolysis method 96 55 (64)
Bozetine et al. 2021 ZnO/CQDs/AgNPs In situ hydrothermal method 98.6 50 (65)
Nugraha et al. 2021 WO3/N-CQDs Simple mixing process 96.86 30 (28)
Moalem-Banhangi et al. 2021 N-doped ZnO/Fulvic acid (FA)/CQDs Hydrothermal method 94 50 (66)
Heng et al. 2020 CQDs/TiO2 In situ hydrothermal method 40.9 60 (67)
Cheng et al. 2019 N-CQDs Hydrothermal method 23 240 (68)
Cl-CQDs 54
Wang et al. 2018 CQDs@CuS (without H2O2) Hydrothermal treatment 10 40 (69)
CQDs@CuS (with H2O2) 100

Degradation Of Naphthol Blue Black Azo Dye

Prasannan et al. reported the synthesis of CQDs/ZnO composite as a photocatalyst to degrade naphthol blue-black azo dye when exposed to UV light by synthesizing CQDs from orange peels.7Figure 10 provides a schematic representation of the CQDs/ZnO degrading pathway of naphthol blue black azo dye.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Degradation pathway of naphthol blue black using ZnO NPs/CQDs composite. M0odified and reprinted with permission from ref (70). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

It has been observed that the use of CQDs in the composite caused almost 100% degradation of the dye in 45 min, which is significantly greater than what the pure CQDs and pure ZnO managed. The ZnO nanoparticles managed to degrade 84.3% in 45 min, while CQDs were able to perform only 4.4% dye degradation in 45 min when used alone. This proves that the use of NPs and CQDs in a system to make a composite creates a synergic effect that immensely increases the degradation abilities and enhances the material properties as a photocatalyst.

Mechanism

The degradation process in the nanocomposite starts with the charge pair (a positive hole and an electron) production due to the excitation of electrons by a photon:54

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m006.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m007.jpg

The dyes are readily oxidized just by the immense oxidative potential caused by the hole (hVB+):

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m008.jpg

This hole also disintegrates water and produces hydroxyl ions which can further be converted into hydroxyl radicals, which are known for their extreme reactivity. Because of the hydroxyl radical’s inherent instability, organic compounds began to degrade.

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m009.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m010.jpg

The conductance electrons (eCB) combine with oxygen to form superoxide anions by reduction of O2:

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m011.jpg

In the presence of organic scavengers or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), the radical may generate organic peroxides:

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m012.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m013.jpg

HO-O is created when holes and hydroxyl radicals combine with excess H2O2.

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m014.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m015.jpg

The conductance electrons (eCB) also produce hydroxyl radicals, which as a result cause degradation in dyes.

graphic file with name ao3c09547_m016.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m017.jpg
graphic file with name ao3c09547_m018.jpg

Degradation Of Congo Red Dye

There have been several studies that have produced CQDs to remove methylene blue and Congo Red in the past. These included CQDs formation from rice husk waste, using bismuth and nitrogen to dope CQDs for better photoluminescence, and to increase its quantum yield. Production of CQDs from sugar cane bagasse, having an amine group on the surface, and then using it for dye removal and degradation. Having these amines modified CQDs paired up with tungsten dioxide to make a composite, but quite recently in 2023, Nizam et al. produced CQDs using rubber seed which is considered to be biomass waste and used it for CR and MB removal and photodegradation.71

Congo Red was degraded under a solar simulator, and the data was used to assess the photocatalytic properties of CQDs. It was observed that the CQDs managed to remove almost 30% of the CR dye in just 30 min, and when tested for MB, it also removed 20% of the dye in the same period. Furthermore, it was noted that in 90 min, the CQDs had removed the Congo red completely from the source, which accounts for its strong adsorption properties, because of the Oxygen functionality present on these carbon-based materials. These Oxygen groups attracted the N-functionalities on the dyes, making it an efficient material for dye removal and photocatalysis. A complete discoloration of CR in the sample, in 90 min, indicates the strong capability of CQDs as a photocatalyst and a sorbent.71 The mechanism pathway for CR degradation is diagrammatically shown in Figure 11, and Table 3 reports various types of CQDs produced over the years to degrade CR. CR degradation can also be observed in Figure 12.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Degradation mechanism pathway of Congo Red (CR) using CQDs. Reprinted with permission from ref (71). Available under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

Table 3. CQDs used for the degradation of CR in recent years.

Authors Year Nanocomposite Methods .Degradation percentage (%) Time (min) Ref
Rahman et al. 2023 CaFe2O4/CQDs Hydrothermal method 90 140 (72)
Abbasi et al. 2023 Undoped bare CQDs Pyrolysis method 98 60 (64)
Vyas et al. 2023 CuSe@CQDs Green synthesis using oxidation 97.8 60 (73)
Lu et al. 2023 N, S-CQDs@Fe3O4@HTC Green synthesis from lignin 95.43 120 (74)
Wei et al. 2023 N-CQDs/TiO2 Hydrothermal method 100 40 (75)
Nizam et al. 2023 Pristine CQDs Graphene oxide using Hummers’ method 90 100 (71)
Padervand et al. 2021 CQDs/BiOCl Microwave irradiation synthesis 96.8 180 (76)
Hu et al. 2020 N-CQDs (4 different types based on precursor) Solvothermal method 82.32 120 (77)

Figure 12.

Figure 12

CQDs used for the degradation of CR in recent years.

Degradation Of Indigo Carmine (IC) Dye

Using aqua mesophase pitch (AMP) and a hydrothermal method, Cheng et al. developed Carbon quantum dots and created two different types by doping them with nitrogen (N-CQDs) and chlorine (Cl-CQDs) to enhance their properties like fluorescence. For the production of CQDs, the AMP reaction mixture was subjected to centrifugation for 10 min at 8 × 103 rpm in an autoclave lined with polytetrafluoroethylene maintained at 120, 150, and 180 °C for 12, 24, and 48 h, respectively. To generate N-CQDs, the CQDs that had been maintained at 120 °C for 24 h were added to an autoclave and ammonia was added to the system. The system was heated for 12 h at 120 °C and then at 80 °C for almost 30 min, in a well-ventilated area. Thionyl chloride and CQDs undergo the same process, for the synthesis of Cl-CQDs.68,7880 The formation of these CQDs can be seen in Figure 13. The quantum yield (QY) of CQDs was 27.6%, and the QY of the chlorine- and nitrogen-doped CQDs was much lower. The Cl-CQDs degraded the highest amount of Indigo carmine and the degradation percentage of the dye was reported to be 60%.7880 The composites of CQDs that have been used for the degradation of IC are reported in Table 4 and can be seen diagrammatically in Figure 14.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Synthetic pathway for N and Cl doped CQDs for IC degradation. Modified and reprinted with permission from ref (68). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.

Table 4. CQDs Used for the Degradation of IC in Recent Years.

Authors Year Nanocomposite Methods Degradation percentage (%) Time Ref
Liu et al. 2023 Surface modified CQDs Hydrothermal method 99.13 15 Days (81)
Hu et al. 2020 N-CQDs (4 different types based on precursor) Solvothermal method 97 120 min (77)
Sharma et al. 2019 α-Bi2O3/CQDs Sonication method 86 120 min (82)
Cheng et al. 2019 N-CQDs Hydrothermal method 56 240 min (68)
Cl-CQDs 60

Figure 14.

Figure 14

CQDs used for the degradation of IC in recent years.

Degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB)

Zhang and colleagues produced a nanocomposite (CQDs/N-TiO2) having nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles (N-TiO2) and carbon quantum dots (CQDs) as its hierarchical components. For carbon dots synthesis, ascorbic acid and ethanol were kept at 160 °C for three h in a high-pressure reactor. To form N-TiO2, a combination of urea (NH2)2CO, nitric acid (HNO3), and anhydrous ethanol was mixed with tetra butyl titanate and was maintained at 240 °C for 10 h in a high-pressure reactor, dried and for 6 h, it was subjected to calcination at 200 °C. For the formation of the composite, CQDs and N-TiO2 were mixed for 1 h, and put through the process of centrifugation, washing, and drying for an entire night at 90 °C.78,80 The degradation mechanism of RhB using N-doped TiO2 NPs/CQDs composite is shown in Figure 15, while Table 5 and Figure 16 contain different types of CQDs and their composites used for the degradation of RhB in recent years.

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Degradation mechanism of RhB using nitrogen-doped TiO2 NPs/CQDs composite. Reprinted and modified with permission from ref (80). Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

Table 5. CQDs Used for the Degradation of RhB in Recent Years.

Authors Year Nanocomposite Methods Degradation percentage (%) Time (min) Ref
Wang et al. 2023 Ag3PO4/g-C3N4/CQDs Ball-milling-assisted H2O2 oxidation method 99 120 (11)
Yi-di et al. 2023 LaFeO3/CQDs-g-C3Nx Hydrothermal method for CQDs and LaFeO3 NPs, C3Nx with alkali treatment, ultrasonication for composite 95.2 60 (83)
Rahmani et al. 2023 MIL-Cr/N-CQDs Hydrothermal for the CQDs, solvent deposition method for composite 95 160 (84)
Ahlawat et al. 2023 CQDs-1 (Precursor: Polyethylenimine and Urea) Pyrolysis method 98.4 100 (85)
CQDs-2 (Precursor: Polyethylenimine and Citric acid) 99.63
Chen et al. 2023 Fe3O4@CQDs Hydrothermal method 98 35 (86)
Tong et al. 2022 TiO2/CQDs Sol–gel hydrolysis 85.47 120 (87)
Preethi et al. 2022 CQDs Green synthesis-stirrer-assisted method 99.11 35 (88)
Zhao et al. 2022 BiOCl/CQDs Mechanical compounding method 95.76 60 (89)
BiOBr/CQDs 98.91%
Jin et al. 2022 g-C3N4/CQDs Graphitic carbon nitride 90.9 120 (90)
Bai et al. 2021 D-CeO2:CQDs/BiOCl composite Hydrothermal method 97.7 25 (91)
Mandal et al. 2021 N-CQDs/ZnO-Nanorods Sol–gel method for ZnO nanorods, pyrolysis for N-CQDs 90 9 (92)
Cheng et al. 2019 N-CQDs Hydrothermal method 97 240 (68)
Cl-CQDs 25
Gao et al. 2019 CQDs/Ag3PO4/BiPO4 Hydrothermal synthesis 98.41 50 (93)

Figure 16.

Figure 16

CQDs used for the degradation of RhB in recent years.

Conclusion and Future Prospects

Water and wastewater treatment, including that of industrial water, is a major public health concern and vital to protecting both the environment and human health. Future studies should focus more on the following concerns regardless of the notable advances in synthesis and the catalytic capacities demonstrated by CQDs and GQDs:

  • To reduce the cost of synthesizing QDs and improve their catalytic activity, novel and inventive synthetic methods are needed.

  • Employment of nontoxic substrates and minerals for the production of CQDs for sustainable development.

  • To improve the magnetization and surface properties of CQDs for water treatment.

  • Development of inexpensive, water-soluble, mild conditions requiring pathways for CQD production to break down a range of contaminants.

  • Animal wastes, such as bones, eggshells, and bristles, are being manipulated to create CQDs that can then be used to clean the environment.

It is possible to establish quantitative methods for quickly measuring the amounts of pollutants based on changes in intensity, in addition to the qualitative impacts of fluorescence quenching or enhancement. The process of oxidizing and using electrochemical assistance to modify carbon dots (CDs) can significantly increase their adsorption rate and capacity to remove contaminants from the environment. This could be considered an innovative approach to environmental remediation, but a thorough assessment of the toxicity issues is required. Scalable methods for the synthesis, purification, and functionalization of CDs must be established since the characteristics of CDs are highly correlated with the experimental setup, dopants, and precursors used. By creating reliable in situ characterization techniques, it will be possible to improve our theoretical knowledge of how CDs are formed, what influences their shape and photochemical characteristics, and how they interact with their surroundings. This would assist scientists in creating methods for customizing the characteristics of nanomaterials for certain uses. According to the majority of findings, CDs can identify or break down specific developing pollutants. Thus, it is imperative to focus on streamlining synthesis and purification procedures, creating a comprehensive knowledge base for the mechanisms underlying CD generation, detection, and degradation, evaluating the viability of CDs in large-scale applications, and anticipating long-term consequences.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Dutta V.; Verma R.; Gopalkrishnan C.; Yuan M.-H.; Batoo K. M.; Jayavel R.; Chauhan A.; Lin K.-Y. A.; Balasubramani R.; Ghotekar S. Bio-inspired synthesis of carbon-based nanomaterials and their potential environmental applications: A state-of-the-art review. Inorganics 2022, 10 (10), 169. 10.3390/inorganics10100169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Karimi H.; Rajabi H. R.; Kavoshi L. Application of decorated magnetic nanophotocatalysts for efficient photodegradation of organic dye: A comparison study on photocatalytic activity of magnetic zinc sulfide and graphene quantum dots. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2020, 397, 112534 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112534. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Verma C.; Berdimurodov E.; Verma D. K.; Berdimuradov K.; Alfantazi A.; Hussain C. 3D Nanomaterials: The Future of Industrial, Biological, and Environmental Applications. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 156, 111163 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rahman A.; Jennings J. R.; Tan A. L.; Khan M. M. Molybdenum disulfide-based nanomaterials for visible-light-induced photocatalysis. ACS omega 2022, 7 (26), 22089–22110. 10.1021/acsomega.2c01314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hebbar A.; Selvaraj R.; Vinayagam R.; Varadavenkatesan T.; Kumar P. S.; Duc P. A.; Rangasamy G. A critical review on the environmental applications of carbon dots. Chemosphere 2023, 313, 137308 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nasrollahzadeh M.; Sajjadi M.; Iravani S.; Varma R. S. Carbon-based sustainable nanomaterials for water treatment: state-of-art and future perspectives. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128005 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mehta A.; Mishra A.; Basu S.; Shetti N. P.; Reddy K. R.; Saleh T. A.; Aminabhavi T. M. Band gap tuning and surface modification of carbon dots for sustainable environmental remediation and photocatalytic hydrogen production–A review. Journal of environmental management 2019, 250, 109486 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu S. Tuning optical properties and photocatalytic activities of carbon-based “quantum dots” through their surface groups. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16 (1), 219–230. 10.1111/tcr.201500225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vibhute A.; Patil T.; Gambhir R.; Tiwari A. P. Fluorescent carbon quantum dots: Synthesis methods, functionalization and biomedical applications. Applied Surface Science Advances 2022, 11, 100311 10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang J.; Jiang J.; Li F.; Zou J.; Xiang K.; Wang H.; Li Y.; Li X. Emerging carbon-based quantum dots for sustainable photocatalysis. Green Chem. 2023, 25 (1), 32–58. 10.1039/D2GC03160D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y.; Ding M.; Li Z.; Li M. Visible light photocatalytic degradation of dyes by Ag3PO4/g-C3N4/CQDs composite. Surfaces and Interfaces 2024, 44, 103585 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu J.; Li R.; Yang B. Carbon dots: A new type of carbon-based nanomaterial with wide applications. ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (12), 2179–2195. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rao V. N.; Reddy N. L.; Kumari M. M.; Cheralathan K.; Ravi P.; Sathish M.; Neppolian B.; Reddy K. R.; Shetti N. P.; Prathap P.; et al. Sustainable hydrogen production for the greener environment by quantum dots-based efficient photocatalysts: a review. Journal of environmental management 2019, 248, 109246 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tian P.; Tang L.; Teng K.; Lau S. Graphene quantum dots from chemistry to applications. Materials today chemistry 2018, 10, 221–258. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.09.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Azam N.; Najabat Ali M.; Javaid Khan T. Carbon quantum dots for biomedical applications: review and analysis. Frontiers in Materials 2021, 8, 700403 10.3389/fmats.2021.700403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kolanowska A.; Dzido G.; Krzywiecki M.; Tomczyk M. M.; Łukowiec D.; Ruczka S.; Boncel S. Carbon quantum dots from amino acids revisited: Survey of renewable precursors toward high quantum-yield blue and green fluorescence. ACS omega 2022, 7 (45), 41165–41176. 10.1021/acsomega.2c04751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Qian Z.; Ma J.; Shan X.; Shao L.; Zhou J.; Chen J.; Feng H. Surface functionalization of graphene quantum dots with small organic molecules from photoluminescence modulation to bioimaging applications: an experimental and theoretical investigation. Rsc Advances 2013, 3 (34), 14571–14579. 10.1039/c3ra42066c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hemmati A.; Emadi H.; Nabavi S. R. Green Synthesis of Sulfur-and Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots for Determination of L-DOPA Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy and a Smartphone-Based Fluorimeter. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 20987. 10.1021/acsomega.3c01795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Han M.; Zhu S.; Lu S.; Song Y.; Feng T.; Tao S.; Liu J.; Yang B. Recent progress on the photocatalysis of carbon dots: Classification, mechanism and applications. Nano Today 2018, 19, 201–218. 10.1016/j.nantod.2018.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Akhavan O.; Ghaderi E. Graphene nanomesh promises extremely efficient in vivo photothermal therapy. Small 2013, 9 (21), 3593–3601. 10.1002/smll.201203106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pandey S.; Ghosh R.; Ghosh A. Preparation of Hydrothermal Carbon Quantum Dots as a Contrast Amplifying Technique for the diaCEST MRI Contrast Agents. ACS omega 2022, 7 (38), 33934–33941. 10.1021/acsomega.2c02911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Boruah A.; Bora S.; Thakur A.; Dutta H. S.; Saikia B. K. Solid-State Phosphors from Coal-Derived Carbon Quantum Dots. ACS omega 2023, 8 (28), 25410–25423. 10.1021/acsomega.3c02884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuan T.; Meng T.; He P.; Shi Y.; Li Y.; Li X.; Fan L.; Yang S. Carbon quantum dots: an emerging material for optoelectronic applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2019, 7 (23), 6820–6835. 10.1039/C9TC01730E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jia H.; Wang Z.; Yuan T.; Yuan F.; Li X.; Li Y.; Tan Z. a.; Fan L.; Yang S. Electroluminescent warm white light-emitting diodes based on passivation enabled bright red bandgap emission carbon quantum dots. Advanced Science 2019, 6 (13), 1900397 10.1002/advs.201900397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao F.; Zhang F.; Han D.; Huang K.; Yang Y.; Yin H. Enhanced light-driven hydrogen generation on carbon quantum dots with TiO 2 nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23 (17), 10448–10455. 10.1039/D1CP00417D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pandiyan S.; Arumugam L.; Srirengan S. P.; Pitchan R.; Sevugan P.; Kannan K.; Pitchan G.; Hegde T. A.; Gandhirajan V. Biocompatible carbon quantum dots derived from sugarcane industrial wastes for effective nonlinear optical behavior and antimicrobial activity applications. ACS omega 2020, 5 (47), 30363–30372. 10.1021/acsomega.0c03290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mehta V. N.; Jha S.; Kailasa S. K. One-pot green synthesis of carbon dots by using Saccharum officinarum juice for fluorescent imaging of bacteria (Escherichia coli) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2014, 38, 20–27. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nugraha M. W.; Zainal Abidin N. H.; Supandi; Sambudi N. S. Synthesis of tungsten oxide/amino-functionalized sugarcane bagasse derived-carbon quantum dots (WO3/N-CQDs) composites for methylene blue removal. Chemosphere 2021, 277, 130300 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma X.; Dong Y.; Sun H.; Chen N. Highly fluorescent carbon dots from peanut shells as potential probes for copper ion: The optimization and analysis of the synthetic process. Materials Today Chemistry 2017, 5, 1–10. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chauhan P.; Mundekkad D.; Mukherjee A.; Chaudhary S.; Umar A.; Baskoutas S. Coconut carbon dots: Progressive large-scale synthesis, detailed biological activities and smart sensing aptitudes towards tyrosine. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (1), 162. 10.3390/nano12010162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Arkan E.; Barati A.; Rahmanpanah M.; Hosseinzadeh L.; Moradi S.; Hajialyani M. Green synthesis of carbon dots derived from walnut oil and an investigation of their cytotoxic and apoptogenic activities toward cancer cells. Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin 2018, 8 (1), 149. 10.15171/apb.2018.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Akhavan O.; Bijanzad K.; Mirsepah A. Synthesis of graphene from natural and industrial carbonaceous wastes. RSC Adv. 2014, 4 (39), 20441–20448. 10.1039/c4ra01550a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chaudhary S.; Kumari M.; Chauhan P.; Ram Chaudhary G. Upcycling of plastic waste into fluorescent carbon dots: An environmentally viable transformation to biocompatible C-dots with potential prospective in analytical applications. Waste Management 2021, 120, 675–686. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Aji M. P.; Wati A. L.; Priyanto A.; Karunawan J.; Nuryadin B. W.; Wibowo E.; Marwoto P.; Sulhadi Polymer carbon dots from plastics waste upcycling. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 2018, 9, 136–140. 10.1016/j.enmm.2018.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Korram J.; Koyande P.; Mehetre S.; Sawant S. N. Biomass-Derived Carbon Dots as Nanoprobes for Smartphone–Paper-Based Assay of Iron and Bioimaging Application. ACS omega 2023, 8 (34), 31410–31418. 10.1021/acsomega.3c03969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mondal A.; Prabhakaran A.; Gupta S.; Subramanian V. R. Boosting photocatalytic activity using reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/semiconductor nanocomposites: issues and future scope. ACS omega 2021, 6 (13), 8734–8743. 10.1021/acsomega.0c06045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Samadi M.; Moshfegh A. Z. Recent Developments of Electrospinning-Based Photocatalysts in Degradation of Organic Pollutants: Principles and Strategies. ACS omega 2022, 7 (50), 45867–45881. 10.1021/acsomega.2c05624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mu J.; Shao C.; Guo Z.; Zhang Z.; Zhang M.; Zhang P.; Chen B.; Liu Y. High photocatalytic activity of ZnO– carbon nanofiber heteroarchitectures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3 (2), 590–596. 10.1021/am101171a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hanif M. A.; Kim Y.-S.; Akter J.; Kim H. G.; Kwac L. K. Fabrication of Robust and Stable N-Doped ZnO/Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Characterization, Photocatalytic Application, Kinetics, Degradation Products, and Toxicity Analysis. ACS omega 2023, 8 (18), 16174–16185. 10.1021/acsomega.3c00370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hosny M.; Fawzy M. Sustainable synthesis of a novel hydrothermally carbonized AuNPs-hydrochar nanocomposite for the photocatalytic degradation of cephalexin. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2023, 1–18. 10.1007/s13399-023-04893-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ahuja P.; Ujjain S. K.; Arora I.; Samim M. Hierarchically grown NiO-decorated polyaniline-reduced graphene oxide composite for ultrafast sunlight-driven photocatalysis. ACS omega 2018, 3 (7), 7846–7855. 10.1021/acsomega.8b00765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mokhtar Mohamed M.; Mousa M. A.; Khairy M.; Amer A. A. Nitrogen graphene: A new and exciting generation of visible light driven photocatalyst and energy storage application. ACS omega 2018, 3 (2), 1801–1814. 10.1021/acsomega.7b01806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kalaiyarasan G.; Joseph J.; Kumar P. Phosphorus-doped carbon quantum dots as fluorometric probes for iron detection. ACS omega 2020, 5 (35), 22278–22288. 10.1021/acsomega.0c02627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Alaghmandfard A.; Sedighi O.; Tabatabaei Rezaei N.; Abedini A. A.; Malek Khachatourian A.; Toprak M. S.; Seifalian A. Recent advances in the modification of carbon-based quantum dots for biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2021, 120, 111756 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kaur M.; Kaur M.; Sharma V. K. Nitrogen-doped graphene and graphene quantum dots: A review onsynthesis and applications in energy, sensors and environment. Advances in colloid and interface science 2018, 259, 44–64. 10.1016/j.cis.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sahu S.; Behera B.; Maiti T. K.; Mohapatra S. Simple one-step synthesis of highly luminescent carbon dots from orange juice: application as excellent bio-imaging agents. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48 (70), 8835–8837. 10.1039/c2cc33796g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Namdari P.; Negahdari B.; Eatemadi A. Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of carbon-based quantum dots: An updated review. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy 2017, 87, 209–222. 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.12.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tian L.; Ghosh D.; Chen W.; Pradhan S.; Chang X.; Chen S. Nanosized carbon particles from natural gas soot. Chemistry of materials 2009, 21 (13), 2803–2809. 10.1021/cm900709w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Cao L.; Wang X.; Meziani M. J.; Lu F.; Wang H.; Luo P. G.; Lin Y.; Harruff B. A.; Veca L. M.; Murray D.; et al. Carbon dots for multiphoton bioimaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (37), 11318–11319. 10.1021/ja073527l. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang S.-T.; Cao L.; Luo P. G.; Lu F.; Wang X.; Wang H.; Meziani M. J.; Liu Y.; Qi G.; Sun Y.-P. Carbon dots for optical imaging in vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (32), 11308–11309. 10.1021/ja904843x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang X.; Cao L.; Lu F.; Meziani M. J.; Li H.; Qi G.; Zhou B.; Harruff B. A.; Kermarrec F.; Sun Y.-P. Photoinduced electron transfers with carbon dots. Chem. Commun. 2009, (25), 3774–3776. 10.1039/b906252a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Deng J.; Lu Q.; Mi N.; Li H.; Liu M.; Xu M.; Tan L.; Xie Q.; Zhang Y.; Yao S. Electrochemical synthesis of carbon nanodots directly from alcohols. Chemistry–A European Journal 2014, 20 (17), 4993–4999. 10.1002/chem.201304869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhai X.; Zhang P.; Liu C.; Bai T.; Li W.; Dai L.; Liu W. Highly luminescent carbon nanodots by microwave-assisted pyrolysis. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48 (64), 7955–7957. 10.1039/c2cc33869f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hairom N. H. H.; Mohammad A. W.; Ng L. Y.; Kadhum A. A. H. Utilization of self-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles in MPR for industrial dye wastewater treatment using NF and UF membrane. Desalination and Water Treatment 2015, 54 (4–5), 944–955. 10.1080/19443994.2014.917988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mishra A.; Basu S.; Shetti N. P.; Reddy K. R.; Aminabhavi T. M.. Photocatalysis of graphene and carbon nitride-based functional carbon quantum dots. In Nanoscale Materials in Water Purification; Elsevier, 2019; pp 759–781. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ke J.; Li X.; Zhao Q.; Liu B.; Liu S.; Wang S. Upconversion carbon quantum dots as visible light responsive component for efficient enhancement of photocatalytic performance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 496, 425–433. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Thakur A.; Kumar P.; Kaur D.; Devunuri N.; Sinha R.; Devi P. TiO 2 nanofibres decorated with green-synthesized P Au/Ag@ CQDs for the efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes and pharmaceutical drugs. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (15), 8941–8948. 10.1039/C9RA10804A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Thirugnanam N.; Song H.; Wu Y. Photocatalytic degradation of Brilliant Green dye using CdSe quantum dots hybridized with graphene oxide under sunlight irradiation. Chinese Journal of Catalysis 2017, 38 (12), 2150–2159. 10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62964-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jin Y.; Tang W.; Wang J.; Ren F.; Chen Z.; Sun Z.; Ren P.-G. Construction of biomass derived carbon quantum dots modified TiO2 photocatalysts with superior photocatalytic activity for methylene blue degradation. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 932, 167627 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Edakkaparamban S.; Kitamura M.; Ide Y.; Umemura K.; Ishizawa A. Photocatalytic degradation study of methylene blue using carbon quantum dots synthesized from coconut husk. Mater. Lett. 2023, 345, 134508 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Elmorsy E. S.; Amer W. A.; Mahrous A.; Ayad M. M. Insight into the novel ZIF-8@ N-CQDs/ZIF-67 nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light irradiation. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2023, 298, 116900 10.1016/j.mseb.2023.116900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Imran Din M.; Ahmed M.; Ahmad M.; Saqib S.; Mubarak W.; Hussain Z.; Khalid R.; Raza H.; Hussain T. Novel and facile synthesis of carbon quantum dots from chicken feathers and their application as a photocatalyst to degrade methylene blue dye. Journal of Chemistry 2023, 2023, 1. 10.1155/2023/9956427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang S.; Gao H.; Fang L.; Hu Q.; Sun G.; Chen X.; Yu C.; Tang S.; Yu X.; Zhao X.; et al. Synthesis of novel CQDs/CeO2/SrFe12O19 magnetic separation photocatalysts and synergic adsorption-photocatalytic degradation effect for methylene blue dye removal. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances 2021, 6, 100089 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Abbasi A.; Abushad M.; Khan A.; Bhat Z. U. H.; Hanif S.; Shakir M. Bare undoped nontoxic carbon dots as a visible light photocatalyst for the degradation of methylene blue and congo red. Carbon Trends 2023, 10, 100238 10.1016/j.cartre.2022.100238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Bozetine H.; Meziane S.; Aziri S.; Berkane N.; Allam D.; Boudinar S.; Hadjersi T. Facile and green synthesis of a ZnO/CQDs/AgNPs ternary heterostructure photocatalyst: study of the methylene blue dye photodegradation. Bulletin of Materials Science 2021, 44, 1–12. 10.1007/s12034-021-02353-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Moalem-Banhangi M.; Ghaeni N.; Ghasemi S. Saffron derived carbon quantum dot/N-doped ZnO/fulvic acid nanocomposite for sonocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Synth. Met. 2021, 271, 116626 10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Heng Z.; Chong W.; Pang Y.; Sim L.. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light using carbon dot/titanium dioxide nanohybrid. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing, 2020; Vol. 991, p 012092. [Google Scholar]
  68. Cheng Y.; Bai M.; Su J.; Fang C.; Li H.; Chen J.; Jiao J. Synthesis of fluorescent carbon quantum dots from aqua mesophase pitch and their photocatalytic degradation activity of organic dyes. Journal of materials science & technology 2019, 35 (8), 1515–1522. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang X.; Li L.; Fu Z.; Cui F. Carbon quantum dots decorated CuS nanocomposite for effective degradation of methylene blue and antibacterial performance. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 268, 578–586. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.07.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Prasannan A.; Imae T. One-pot synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from orange waste peels. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52 (44), 15673–15678. 10.1021/ie402421s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nizam N. U. M.; Hanafiah M. M.; Mahmoudi E.; Mohammad A. W. Synthesis of highly fluorescent carbon quantum dots from rubber seed shells for the adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of dyes. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13 (1), 12777 10.1038/s41598-023-40069-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Innam ur Rahman M.; Khan H. M.; Ashiq M. N.; Islam M. U.; Buzdar S. A.; Sadiq I.; Honey S.; Batool Z.; Sheikh R.; Zahid M.; et al. One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of a carbon quantum dot/CaFe2O4 hybrid nanocomposite for carcinogenic Congo red dye degradation. RSC Adv. 2023, 13 (21), 14461–14471. 10.1039/D3RA00334E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Vyas Y.; Chundawat P.; Dharmendra D.; Chaubisa P.; Kumar M.; Punjabi P. B.; Ameta C. Revolutionizing fuel production through biologically synthesized zero-dimensional nanoparticles. Nanoscale Advances 2023, 5 (18), 4833–4851. 10.1039/D3NA00268C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lu Y.; Xu H.; Wei S.; Jiang F.; Zhang J.; Ge Y.; Li Z. In situ doping lignin-derived carbon quantum dots on magnetic hydrotalcite for enhanced degradation of Congo Red over a wide pH range and simultaneous removal of heavy metal ions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124303 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wei N.; Yang J.; Miao J.; Jia R.; Qin Z. Production of the protein-based nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots/TiO2 nanoparticles with rapid and efficient photocatalytic degradation of hexavalent chromium. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2023, 444, 114947 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.114947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Padervand M.; Mazloum M.; Bargahi A.; Arsalani N. CQDs/BiOCl photocatalysts for the efficient treatment of congo red aqueous solution under visible light. Journal of Nanostructures 2021, 11 (4), 790–801. 10.22052/JNS.2021.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Hu Y.; Guan R.; Zhang C.; Zhang K.; Liu W.; Shao X.; Xue Q.; Yue Q. Fluorescence and photocatalytic activity of metal-free nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots with varying nitrogen contents. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 531, 147344 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147344. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jung H.; Sapner V. S.; Adhikari A.; Sathe B. R.; Patel R. Recent progress on carbon quantum dots based photocatalysis. Frontiers in Chemistry 2022, 10, 881495 10.3389/fchem.2022.881495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rani U. A.; Ng L. Y.; Ng C. Y.; Mahmoudi E.; Ng Y.-S.; Mohammad A. W. Sustainable production of nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and malachite green. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2021, 40, 101816 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101816. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang J.; Cao Y.; Zhao P.; Xie T.; Lin Y.; Mu Z. Visible-light-driven pollutants degradation with carbon quantum dots/N-TiO2 under mild condition: Facile preparation, dramatic performance and deep mechanism insight. Colloids Surf., A 2020, 601, 125019 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Liu L.; Zhang Y.; Cheng Y.; Chen J.; Li F. Photoluminescence Performance and Photocatalytic Activity of Modified Carbon Quantum Dots Derived from Pluronic F127. Polymers 2023, 15 (4), 850. 10.3390/polym15040850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sharma S.; Mehta S.; Ibhadon A.; Kansal S. Fabrication of novel carbon quantum dots modified bismuth oxide (α-Bi2O3/C-dots): material properties and catalytic applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 533, 227–237. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yi-di W.; You-wei S.; Feng Z.; Hui-xia M.; Yan-juan W.; Shao-zheng H.; Jian Z. Photocatalytic performance study of LaFeO 3/CQDs-gC 3 N x catalysts. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 2023, 51 (2), 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  84. Rahmani M.; Abbasi A.; Hosseini M.-S. Fabrication of visible light responsive nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots/MIL-101 (Cr) composites for enhanced photodegradation of Rhodamine B. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2023, 445, 115019 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ahlawat A.; Dhiman T. K.; Solanki P. R.; Rana P. S. Facile synthesis of carbon dots via pyrolysis and their application in photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B (RhB). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022, 02, 1–8. 10.21926/cr.2204039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Chen P.; Zhang X.; Cheng Z.; Xu Q.; Zhang X.; Liu Y.; Qiu F. Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activated by magnetic Fe3O4 doped carbon quantum dots (CQDs) for degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light: DFT calculations and mechanism analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 426, 139202 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tong S.; Zhou J.; Ding L.; Zhou C.; Liu Y.; Li S.; Meng J.; Zhu S.; Chatterjee S.; Liang F. Preparation of carbon quantum dots/TiO2 composite and application for enhanced photodegradation of rhodamine B. Colloids Surf., A 2022, 648, 129342 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Preethi M.; Viswanathan C.; Ponpandian N. A metal-free, dual catalyst for the removal of Rhodamine B using novel carbon quantum dots from muskmelon peel under sunlight and ultrasonication: A green way to clean the environment. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2022, 426, 113765 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhao Y.; Guo H.; Liu J.; Xia Q.; Liu J.; Liang X.; Liu E.; Fan J. Effective photodegradation of rhodamine B and levofloxacin over CQDs modified BiOCl and BiOBr composite: Mechanism and toxicity assessment. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 627, 180–193. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Jin T.; Liu C.; Chen F.; Qian J.; Qiu Y.; Meng X.; Chen Z. Synthesis of g-C3N4/CQDs composite and its photocatalytic degradation property for Rhodamine B. Carbon Letters 2022, 32 (6), 1451–1462. 10.1007/s42823-022-00382-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  91. Bai J.; Wang X.; Han G.; Xie Z.; Diao G. CQDs decorated oxygen vacancy-rich CeO2/BiOCl heterojunctions for promoted visible light photoactivity towards chromium (VI) reduction and rhodamine B degradation. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 859, 157837 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mandal S. K.; Paul S.; Datta S.; Jana D. Nitrogenated CQD decorated ZnO nanorods towards rapid photodegradation of rhodamine B: A combined experimental and theoretical approach. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 563, 150315 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Gao H.; Zheng C.; Yang H.; Niu X.; Wang S. Construction of a CQDs/Ag3PO4/BiPO4 heterostructure photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B under simulated solar irradiation. Micromachines 2019, 10 (9), 557. 10.3390/mi10090557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES