Abstract
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is an important cause of neonatal sepsis among both term and preterm infants. Because GBS colonizes human genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts, a significant focus of neonatal GBS disease prevention is to interrupt vertical transmission of GBS from mother to infant during parturition. Routine antepartum GBS screening in pregnant women, as well as widespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, have aided in overall reductions in neonatal GBS disease over the last three decades. However, neonatal GBS disease persists and may cause mortality and significant short- and long-term morbidity among survivors. Here, we highlight contemporary epidemiology, microbial pathogenesis, and the clinical presentation spectrum associated with neonatal GBS disease. We summarize obstetric recommendations for antenatal GBS screening, indications for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and considerations for antibiotic selection. Finally, we review national guidelines for risk-assessment and management of infants at risk for GBS disease.
INTRODUCTION
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) emerged in the 1970s as a leading cause of neonatal sepsis in the United States, and currently accounts for approximately 30% of early-onset neonatal sepsis cases1. Maternal GBS colonization occurs in 10–35% of parturients in the U.S.2–4, and is a major risk factor for neonatal early-onset GBS disease acquired via vertical transmission during birth. The overall incidence of neonatal GBS disease has decreased over the last several decades, largely due to reductions in early-onset GBS disease in the era of protocolized screening for maternal GBS colonization and widespread use of GBS-targeted intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). However, there are no current strategies for late-onset neonatal GBS disease prevention, and the national incidence of late-onset infection has not changed with use of IAP. This article summarizes the epidemiology of neonatal GBS disease, consensus recommendations for maternal screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, and management of neonates at risk for GBS disease.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Early-Onset GBS Disease
Early-onset GBS disease (EOGBS) is defined as infection presenting between days 0–6 after birth5. Estimated U.S. EOGBS incidence has steadily decreased over the past three decades6–8: from 1.8 cases/1000 live births in 19929 to 0.2 cases/1000 live births in 202010. Globally, EOGBS incidence is 0.41 cases/1000 live births, with 2-fold higher incidence in low- and middle-income compared to high-income countries11. In 2020, 43% of all neonatal GBS disease cases in the U.S. occurred in the early-onset period10. A Neonatal Research Network (NRN) study of infants born 2015–2017 with early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) identified that GBS caused 30% of all EOS cases occurring within 72 hours after birth. GBS was the second-most common pathogen overall in this cohort (after Escherichia coli, which was isolated in 35% of all cases)1. However, early-onset GBS disease rates differ between infants born at term versus preterm; almost 75% of all EOGBS cases occur in term infants6. Among infants within the NRN with EOS, GBS accounted for 51% of EOS cases in term infants (born ≥37 weeks’ gestation), compared to 13% of EOS cases in preterm infants (born ≤36 weeks gestation). Among very low birth weight infants (born <1500 grams) admitted to Vermont Oxford Network center NICUs in 2018–2019, GBS accounted for 19% of EOS cases12.
Late-Onset GBS Disease
Late-onset GBS disease (LOGBS) is defined as invasive GBS disease presenting on days 7–89 after birth. LOGBS incidence has remained stable over the past two decades, with incidence estimated at 0.3–0.4 cases/1000 live births both in the U.S. and worldwide6,8,11. LOGBS is now the predominant form of neonatal GBS disease, accounting for 57% of all neonatal GBS cases in 202010. Preterm infants (born <37 weeks’ gestation) account for 10–11% of all US births13 but Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveillance reports that 48% of LOGBS cases occur among preterm infants6. Population-level estimates suggest that preterm infants are at six times higher risk of developing LOGBS, compared to term infants6. Accordingly, a substantial proportion of LOGBS occurs in chronically hospitalized infants, accounting for 19% of all LOGBS cases in a large Japanese surveillance study14.
PATHOGENESIS
Microbiology
GBS is a beta-hemolytic encapsulated Gram-positive bacterium that colonizes the human genitourinary and gastrointestinal tracts. Colonization is mediated by GBS surface proteins which allow effective adherence to the extracellular matrix on the epithelial surface15. Molecular pathogenesis of GBS is complex15 and involves invasion of epithelial barriers (including placental membranes and pulmonary epithelium) via endocytosis. GBS produces numerous toxins (e.g., beta-haemolysin/cytolysin and CAMP factor) that proceed to cause direct cytotoxic tissue injury. GBS evades the host immune response via its polysaccharide surface capsule, which mimics human surface antigens and evades complement deposition, thus interfering with host opsonization and phagocytosis. Among bacteria undergoing phagocytosis, GBS is uniquely able to resist oxidative burst killing via expression of superoxide dismutase and production of carotenoid pigments that neutralize host oxidative stressors.
GBS’ capsular polysaccharides are major virulence factors and the primary microbial element distinguishing GBS serotypes16. Ten GBS serotypes have been identified (types Ia, Ib, and II-IX), with types Ia, Ib, II, III, and V occurring most commonly and accounting for 98% of serotypes causing maternal colonization and neonatal GBS disease6,11,16,17. Serotype distribution differs by timing of GBS onset; CDC US surveillance during 2006–2015 identified that EOGBS was most commonly associated with serotypes Ia (27%), III (27%), and II (16%), while LOGBS was most commonly associated with serotypes III (56%) and Ia (20%)6.
GBS is a common cause of neonatal meningitis and effectively invades and causes direct injury to the central nervous system. GBS penetrates the epithelial blood-brain barrier via transcytosis, aided by beta-haemolysin/cytolysin’s direct cytotoxic activity. Preclinical studies in mice suggest that invasion of GBS through the blood-brain barrier then triggers a robust inflammatory response leading to diffuse neutrophil recruitment, cytokine release, vascular damage, and neuronal death15.
Transmission
Vaginal-rectal GBS colonization rates range from 10–35% among parturients in the U.S.2–4,18. Maternal GBS colonization can produce an adaptive immune response in the form of serotype-specific IgG production, detectable in 50% of colonized mothers at delivery2. Among colonized women, young maternal age is associated with negative GBS serostatus. Neonates colonized at birth almost universally share the same GBS serotype colonizing their mothers antenatally19–21. Among colonized mothers not receiving intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), neonatal GBS colonization rates at birth are reported at 43–60%22,23, decreasing to as low as 0–9% in the setting of intrapartum ampicillin treatment23–25. Maternal receipt of IAP is also associated with lower rates of heavy neonatal GBS colonization burden (decreasing from 35% to 12% in one prospective cohort study of mother-infant dyads)21.
Among all infants of GBS-colonized women, EOGBS rates are approximately 1–2% in the absence of IAP, decreasing to 0.3% in settings with routine IAP use26. Neonatal EOGBS results from vertical transmission of GBS from mother to fetus via ascending infection through ruptured membranes, translocation through intact membranes, or aspiration during parturition25. Higher maternal colonization density is associated with increased likelihood of neonatal colonization at birth24,27. In addition to GBS colonization, risk factors for development of EOGBS include preterm birth, prolonged duration of membrane rupture, presence of intra-amniotic infection, GBS bacteriuria during pregnancy, and history of a prior neonate with GBS disease28. Transplacental transfer of maternal serotype-specific GBS antibodies appears to protect neonates from invasive GBS disease. Presence of serotype-specific maternal antibody is associated with an estimated 70–90% risk reduction of neonatal EOGBS29, while negative maternal GBS serostatus is associated with invasive neonatal GBS disease30. In the era of universal screening and GBS IAP, EOGBS now most commonly occurs in the setting of negative maternal GBS screening results (reported 50–80%)1,31,32 – potentially attributable to false-negative antenatal screening results, or to maternal GBS colonization occurring after screening but prior to delivery.
GBS acquisition in LOGBS is likely multifactorial. Only 10–50% of infants with LOGBS are born in the setting of positive antenatal maternal GBS screening33–35. Nonetheless, vertical transmission is implicated in LOGBS, with up to 50% of infants colonized at birth18. Delayed vertical transmission from GBS-colonized mothers to their infants after hospital discharge also occurs21. IAP reduces maternal GBS colonization burden and decreases immediate transmission during birth; delayed transmission can occur when maternal GBS colonization burden rises after IAP-induced suppression wanes. Mothers with negative antenatal GBS screens may become colonized after delivery, resulting in delayed neonatal GBS colonization and disease onset. Among 53 Italian neonates with LOGBS, only 33% were born in the setting of positive maternal GBS screening; by the time LOGBS was diagnosed, 63% of these infants’ mothers were GBS-colonized33. A longitudinal cohort study of infants of GBS-colonized mothers identified that (1) delayed neonatal colonization does occur, as early as 15 days post-delivery, and (2) GBS strains identified in delayed neonatal colonization were identical to maternal strains present at birth21. Associations of LOGBS with exposure to GBS from breastmilk are reported but the importance of breastmilk as a source of neonatal colonization is controversial. One prospective study of LOGBS found 6/83 mothers GBS-colonized postpartum had GBS in breastmilk21. It remains unclear if the colonized or infected mammary gland is a source of neonatal colonization, or vice versa33,36–38. Finally, horizontal transmission is implicated, both from community nonmaternal sources and from nosocomial origins (including hospital-based outbreaks with presumed transmission via nursery staff)33,39.
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
GBS is primarily a perinatal pathogen, and in addition to neonatal disease it causes bacteremia, chorioamnionitis, and endometritis in parturient women40. Rising rates of invasive GBS disease are also noted in non-pregnant adults, particularly the elderly, largely manifested as bacteremia, pneumonia, and skin/soft tissue infections41,42.
Fetal
GBS infection is associated with adverse fetal outcomes, particularly with stillbirth. A systematic review identified that 0–12% of stillbirths are associated with isolation of GBS from an otherwise sterile compartment43 - an estimated annual 57,000 GBS-associated stillbirths worldwide44. Maternal GBS colonization has also been associated with preterm birth, though this relationship is confounded by accompanying perinatal factors (e.g., preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes) that may themselves increase the risk of GBS infection. Maternal GBS bacteriuria is associated with both preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes, but an association with preterm birth has not been consistently identifed45,46
Early-onset GBS Disease
While EOGBS is defined as GBS disease presenting during days 0–6 after birth, the vast majority of contemporary EOGBS cases (95%) present during the birth hospitalization, within the first 48 hours after birth6. Clinical risk factors for EOGBS overlap with general neonatal early-onset sepsis risk factors, and include preterm birth, maternal intrapartum fever, clinical concern for intraamniotic infection, prolonged duration of membrane rupture, and inadequate exposure to IAP (if indicated)31,47. Isolated bacteremia is the most common manifestation of EOGBS (80–90%); meningitis with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture-confirmed infection is less commonly reported (1–10%)1,6,7. Early-onset GBS meningitis incidence may be underestimated given low rates of lumbar punctures performed prior to antibiotic initiation1. Clinical signs at EOGBS presentation are nonspecific and commonly include respiratory distress, tachycardia, apnea, and/or lethargy. Infants with early-onset meningitis may present with seizures48. Rarer but severe manifestations of EOGBS disease may include shock, perinatal encephalopathy, and pneumonia with or without pulmonary hypertension49. GBS pneumonia may appear radiographically indistinguishable from the respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn50,51, mandating a high index of suspicion for early-onset infection among infants with respiratory failure at birth.
Late-onset GBS Disease
Reported median age at LOGBS presentation ranges from 27–41 days old, with term infants presenting earlier than preterm infants6,14,33,35. Clinical factors associated with LOGBS include preterm birth, maternal GBS colonization, and multiple gestation33,52. Globally, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed but uninfected infants appear to have four-fold higher rates of LOGBS compared to HIV-unexposed infants; reduced transplacental transfer of GBS-specific antibodies to HIV-exposed infants is one proposed explanation for this finding53. Clinical manifestations of LOGBS are more heterogeneous compared to EOGBS. Isolated bacteremia occurs most frequently (61%), though meningitis is also common (31%)6. Less common presentations include pneumonia, urinary tract infection, septic arthritis/osteomyelitis, skin and soft tissue infections, and adenitis6,33,35. Importantly, up to 8% of infants with any LOGBS disease (and up to 30% of infants with CSF culture-confirmed meningitis) have negative blood cultures6,54, highlighting the utility of inclusion of urine, CSF, and focal site cultures (as applicable) in routine evaluations of infants with suspected late-onset neonatal sepsis. Clinical signs reported in LOGBS include fever, poor feeding, respiratory distress with tachypnea, emesis, changes in mental status (irritability, lethargy), and seizures (particularly among infants with LOGBS meningitis)35,48,49. LOGBS may progress to fulminant disease with septic shock (variably reported with rates ranging 3–10%)6,33,35, and up to 30% of all infants with LOGBS presenting to emergency departments require intensive care unit admission35. Table 1 summarizes characteristics of EOGBS and LOGBS.
Table 1:
Comparison of Early- and Late-Onset GBS Disease
| Early-Onset GBS | Late-Onset GBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | 0 – 6 days of age | 7 – 89 days of age |
| Epidemiology | U.S. incidence decreasing, currently ~0.2 cases/1000 live births ~75% of early-onset GBS occurs in term infants (≥37 weeks gestation) Prevalence in preterm infants with early-onset sepsis is 13–19% |
Stable U.S. incidence (~0.3 cases/1000 live births) ~50% of late-onset GBS occurs in term infants Most common form of neonatal GBS disease (57% of all neonatal GBS cases) |
| Transmission | Vertical transmission from a colonized mother | Multifactorial: vertical transmission; horizontal transmission via nonmaternal community and/or nosocomial sources |
| Risk factors | Maternal GBS colonization Preterm labor Prolonged membrane rupture Concern for intra-amniotic infection at delivery |
Maternal GBS colonization Prematurity |
| Clinical Presentation | Usually presents within first 48 hours after birth Isolated bacteremia in 80–90%, meningitis in up to 10% Nonspecific presenting signs, less frequent severe presentations (pneumonia, pulmonary hypertension, shock) |
Median ages at presentation 27–41 days of age Isolated bacteremia in 60%, meningitis in 30–35%. Less commonly presents as pneumonia, UTI, bone/joint infection, skin/soft tissue infection Nonspecific presenting signs; occasionally proceeds to shock |
| Management | Perform lumbar puncture if not already done Antibiotic of choice is parenteral penicillin G (ampicillin is an alternative agent) Antibiotic treatment duration 10 days for isolated bacteremia; 14 days for meningitis. Longer courses required for osteomyelitis, ventriculitis. Hearing screening in all infants with meningitis; consider cranial imaging also |
|
Recurrent GBS disease is uncommon and poorly described, though appears to occur among 2–3% of infants with any invasive GBS disease. This phenomenon most frequently manifests as LOGBS in both the initial and the recurrent episodes, and most commonly affects preterm infants14,33,55. Recurrent GBS disease may occur in the setting of recrudescence of the original GBS serotype in a colonized infant; most studies of recurrent disease find identical GBS strains in each episode of disease55,56. In one study of 21 infected infants and their 20 mothers, oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal GBS colonization was present in half of the infants at the completion of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy. Rifampin was administered to infants with persistent colonization and to their mothers, but this treatment failed to eradicate colonization in the majority of the dyads57. The association of GBS-positive breast milk with recurrent GBS disease is controversial. In a case series of 48 LOGBS cases associated with GBS-positive breast milk, 35% of cases were recurrent38. However, breast milk is also an important source of protection from neonatal GBS disease (via maternal serotype-specific GBS antibodies, if present), and it is unclear whether GBS-positive breast milk causes LOGBS or if it merely reflects a site of maternal colonization49. Horizontal transmission may account for episodes of recurrent disease with discordant GBS serotypes14,55. Immature adaptive immune responses reducing neonatal GBS antibody production may also compound susceptibility to recurrent infection.
Very Late-Onset GBS Disease
“Very late-onset” GBS disease in infancy presents on or after day 90 of age. Very-late onset GBS disease accounts for 10–25% of all GBS cases presenting after 7 days of age34,54,58. Median ages at presentation are 115 days (range 91–226 days)54 and 118 days (interquartile range 98–790 days)34. Similar to LOGBS, bacteremia and meningitis are the primary clinical disease manifestations. Preterm birth is a consistent risk factor14,54,58–60. A national surveillance study of 242 late-onset GBS meningitis cases in France identified a significantly higher prevalence of infants born <32 weeks gestation among infants with very late-onset disease (32%) compared to late-onset disease (7%)54. The vulnerability of very preterm infants may be related to reduced exposure to protective, transplacentally-acquired GBS-specific antibodies as well as to prolonged immature innate immune responses. Innate or acquired immunodeficiency is also reported in the setting of very late-onset GBS disease, including hypogammaglobulinemia, symptomatic HIV infection, and immunosuppression following organ transplant14,34,59.
OBSTETRIC SCREENING AND INTRAPARTUM MANAGEMENT
In 2020, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) published updated consensus guidance for obstetric approaches to neonatal GBS disease prevention61. This guidance is detailed below, and summarized in Table 2.
Table 2:
ACOG Guidance for Group B Streptococcus Screening and Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis
| Screening | |
|---|---|
| Eligibility and timing |
|
| Method |
|
| Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis (IAP) | |
| Indications for IAP |
|
| Antibiotic Selection | |
| No history of penicillin allergy |
|
| History of penicillin allergy |
|
Antepartum Screening
ACOG recommends universal GBS screening among all pregnant women between 36 0/7 and 37 6/7 weeks’ gestation, maximizing the likelihood that GBS screening results will reflect colonization status at delivery. Recto-vaginal cultures are the current gold-standard screening test, although nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) demonstrates similar-to-improved rates of GBS isolation. Limitations of NAAT for routine screening include an inability to perform antibiotic susceptibility testing on positive GBS screens, and up to 10% false-negative rate when used as a rapid point-of-care test.
Indications for Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis
IAP is administered with the intent of suppressing colonizing GBS bacterial burden at delivery to reduce neonatal colonization and EOGBS disease. IAP is indicated for all parturients with positive GBS screening results obtained after 36 0/7 weeks gestation. Additional indications for IAP, including in the setting of unknown GBS status, are listed in Table 2. According to contemporary CDC surveillance, approximately 50% of EOGBS cases occur in settings where perinatal IAP was not indicated, largely due to negative antenatal GBS screening results6. In 20% of EOGBS cases, IAP was indicated but not administered. Less than 10% of cases occurred in the setting of receipt of IAP for >4 hours prior to delivery as recommended by ACOG guidance, and in these cases it was unclear if the administration of alternate medications such as clindamycin were given appropriately.
Antibiotic Selection and Timing of Administration
Intravenous penicillin is the preferred agent for GBS-targeted IAP given its narrow spectrum of activity with exceedingly low GBS resistance rates; ampicillin is an acceptable alternative (Table 2). These agents should be dosed every 4 hours until delivery; the effectiveness of penicillin or ampicillin to prevent neonatal EOGBS is highest when prophylaxis is received at least 4 hours prior to delivery62. IAP exposure as soon as 1–2 hours prior to delivery does reduce neonatal GBS colonization rates, though impact on EOGBS reduction is more difficult to ascertain63.
Approximately 10% of U.S. parturients report a penicillin allergy32; clindamycin susceptibility testing should be performed on GBS isolates from penicillin-allergic parturients. In the setting of “high-risk” maternal penicillin allergy (e.g., presumed IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction), IAP should consist of clindamycin if the GBS isolate is clindamycin-sensitive. If the isolate is clindamycin-resistant, IAP should consist of vancomycin. Among women with “low-risk” penicillin allergy (history not consistent with acute hypersensitivity reaction), ACOG recommends cefazolin as GBS IAP.
Fetal-Neonatal Exposure to Intrapartum Antibiotics
Transplacental fetal-neonatal exposure to maternally-administered antibiotics depends on multiple factors, including maternal drug dosing, duration of exposure prior to delivery, and conditions affecting placental blood flow and efficiency of drug transfer (e.g., pre-eclampsia, diabetes)64. Beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillin, ampicillin, and cefazolin) exhibit rapid placental transfer; GBS bactericidal concentrations are achieved in the fetal compartment within several minutes of administration and can persist for several hours64,65. While available data suggest transplacental vancomycin and clindamycin transfer occurs, the magnitude of fetal exposure and its effectiveness against EOGBS is unclear. Vancomycin undergoes renal elimination (which is physiologically accelerated during pregnancy) and transplacental transfer is slow owing to its large molecular weight64. Ex vivo placental models suggested limited placental transfer of vancomycin at standard dosing (1 gram every 12 hours)66,67. Weight-based vancomycin dosing (20 mg/kg every 8h) more frequently produced therapeutic vancomycin levels in umbilical cord blood compared to standard dosing (77–83% vs 9%, respectively)68,69. Based on these data, obstetric GBS IAP guidelines were revised to recommend weight-based vancomycin dosing in 201961. Clindamycin is highly protein-bound, and transplacental transfer is three times slower than beta-lactam antibiotics64. Studies of transplacental transfer of clindamycin provide conflicting results; one pharmacokinetic study of 7 dyads identified that maternal clindamycin concentrations may be subtherapeutic, with neonatal clindamycin exposure even lower70. However, another study among 23 term infants identified that 96% achieved therapeutic clindamycin concentrations in cord blood following intrapartum exposure71. Further pharmacokinetic data are needed to optimize IAP antibiotic dosing, particularly among preterm infants for whom this data is most lacking.
GBS antibiotic resistance patterns have evolved since its emergence in the 1970s. Prevalence of erythromycin resistance among maternal GBS isolates is 33–45%6,72,73, and erythromycin is no longer recommended as GBS IAP as of 201074. Among currently-utilized alternative IAP agents, clindamycin resistance rates in maternal GBS isolates are 18–33%, while vancomycin resistance is rare6,72,73. Rising resistance is similarly seen in invasive neonatal GBS disease, with clindamycin resistance in 50% and erythromycin resistance in 60% of infecting neonatal GBS isolates in 202175. GBS remains highly susceptible to first-line IAP agents, and resistance to penicillin or ampicillin is rare.
MANAGEMENT OF NEONATES AT RISK FOR EARLY-ONSET GBS DISEASE
Risk Assessment
All newborn infants require a clinical assessment of their early-onset sepsis risk at birth. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) endorses multiple approaches to assess early-onset sepsis risk (EOS; inclusive of EOGBS risk) among infants born ≥35 weeks gestation (Figure 1)49,76. The first approach is a categorical risk assessment, which identifies infants at higher EOS risk based on clinical status, presence of maternal intrapartum fever, and exposure to appropriate GBS IAP (if indicated). The Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator (https://neonatalsepsiscalculator.kaiserpermanente.org) is a web-based multivariate approach to risk assessment that calculates a posterior probability of EOS based on gestational age, highest maternal intrapartum temperature, duration of membrane rupture, maternal GBS colonization status, maternal receipt of IAP (if indicated) and duration of fetal exposure prior to delivery, and infant clinical status. A final approach leverages serial clinical observations to identify infants who may be at higher risk of EOS. An individual center’s choice of EOS risk assessment approach may be influenced by numerous factors, including: local EOS incidence, preferences balancing risk acceptance with empiric antibiotic utilization, and availability and training of personnel to perform vital signs and serial clinical assessments in the nursery.

Comparison of American Academy of Pediatrics-endorsed approaches for early-onset sepsis risk assessment in term infants.
For the purposes of neonatal risk-stratification, AAP guidance defines “adequate” IAP as maternal administration of penicillin, ampicillin, or cefazolin, given these agents’ favorable pharmacokinetic parameters, efficiency of transplacental transfer, and low GBS resistance rates49. Maternal receipt of clindamycin or vancomycin is considered inadequate IAP, given lack of clarity surrounding transplacental exposures and subsequent efficacy in reducing neonatal EOGBS disease.
These risk-stratification approaches do not apply to preterm infants born ≤34 weeks, who are at statistically highest risk of EOS and for EOS-related mortality. The maternal GBS status is often unknown in these infants, as antenatal GBS screening is not routinely performed until 36 0/7 weeks’ gestation. Accordingly, most (80–90%) very preterm infants in the U.S. receive empiric antibiotics at birth due to EOS risk77. The AAP currently endorses identification of a narrow cohort of preterm infants at very low EOS risk based on delivery characteristics, and for whom empiric antibiotic therapy may be deferred in the appropriate clinical scenario78.
Management of Infants with Suspected or Confirmed Early-Onset GBS Disease
Risk-assessment strategies are intended to support management of infants with varying levels of EOS risk at birth. Options for clinical management among infants with higher EOS risk range from enhanced clinical observation, to administration of empiric antibiotics following collection of a blood culture49,76. Recommended empiric antibiotic regimens for infants aged 0–7 days at risk of EOGBS include ampicillin and an aminoglycoside. Among healthy infants ≥8 days of age in the, empiric antibiotic therapy should include ampicillin and a cephalosporin (ceftazidime if aged 8–28 days, ceftriaxone if aged 29–90 days). Vancomycin may be added if there is high clinical concern for meningitis. Empiric antibiotic regimens for infants at risk for invasive GBS disease who remain hospitalized beyond 72 hours of age may vary by institution and depend on local antibiograms and patient-level factors (e.g., presence of indwelling central lines).
Among infants with blood culture-confirmed GBS disease, a lumbar puncture should be performed if not already performed. Antibiotic therapy should be narrowed based on antibiotic susceptibilities; the vast majority of isolates are susceptible to parenteral penicillin G, which is the preferred agent for GBS monotherapy (ampicillin is an acceptable alternative) (Table 3). The recommended total antibiotic duration for treatment of isolated GBS bacteremia is 10 days. If meningitis is present, recommended antibiotic duration is 14 days, and clinicians should consider adjunctive brain imaging (e.g., MRI) to assess for associated abscess or ventriculitis. Longer antibiotic durations are required for GBS osteomyelitis (at least 3 weeks) and ventriculitis (at least 4 weeks); clinicians should consider consultation with a pediatric infectious disease specialist in these cases.
Table 3:
Antibiotic Regimens for Neonatal Early- and Late-Onset GBS Disease
| Antibiotic Route | Early-Onset GBS (≤7 days of age) | Late-Onset GBS (8–28 days of age) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA ≤34 weeks | GA ≥35 weeks | GA ≤34 weeks | GA ≥35 weeks | ||
| Bacteremia | |||||
| Penicillin G aqueous | IV, IM | 50,000 U/kg every 12 hours | 50,000 U/kg every 12 hours | 50,000 U/kg every 8 hours | 50,000 U/kg every 8 hours |
| Ampicillin | IV, IM | 50 mg/kg every 12 hours | 50 mg/kg every 8 hours | 75 mg/kg every 12 hours | 50 mg/kg every 8 hours |
| Meningitis | |||||
| Penicillin G aqueous | IV, IM | 150,000 U/kg every 8 hours | 150,000 U/kg every 8 hours | 125,000 U/kg every 6 hours | 125,000 U/kg every 6 hours |
| Ampicillin | IV, IM | 100 mg/kg every 8 hours | 100 mg/kg every 8 hours | 75 mg/kg every 6 hours | 75 mg/kg every 6 hours |
Adapted from Table 4.2, Antibacterial Drugs for Neonates (≤28 Postnatal Days of Age). In: David W. Kimberlin, MD, FAAP, Elizabeth D. Barnett, MD, FAAP, Ruth Lynfield, MD, FAAP, Mark H. Sawyer, MD F, eds. Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 32nd ed. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2021: 877.
GA, gestational age (weeks); IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; U/kg, units per kilogram
PROGNOSIS
EOGBS case-fatality rates are estimated at 5–7%1,6,8, with preterm infants at much higher risk of death than term infants (19% vs 2% mortality rates, respectively)6. LOGBS case-fatality rates are estimated at 3–5%, with higher mortality rates among preterm (8%) compared to term (3%) infants6,8,33. Infants surviving invasive GBS infection are at increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), which may include intellectual, motor, visual, and/or hearing impairments. In a systematic review, the prevalence of any NDI among survivors of neonatal GBS meningitis was 32% at 18 months’ follow-up, with moderate-severe NDI in 18% of survivors79. Clinical factors associated with death or NDI in GBS meningitis include higher illness severity at presentation, failed hearing screening at hospital discharge, abnormal neurologic examination at discharge, and abnormal brain imaging after completion of antibiotic therapy80. Extremely preterm infants, who are already at significant baseline risk of death or NDI, may be especially vulnerable to poor outcomes from invasive GBS disease. Among infants born 22–28 weeks gestation with invasive GBS disease in the Neonatal Research Network, 79% died or survived with NDI: the risk of death or NDI was 1.2-fold higher compared to extremely preterm infants with non-GBS infections, and 1.44-fold higher compared to uninfected infants81.
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Neonatal GBS disease is not eradicated with universal GBS screening and IAP utilization, and LOGBS disease rates remain stable. This has spurred efforts to develop a maternal GBS vaccine, with aims to (1) reduce maternal GBS colonization and (2) reduce incidence of neonatal GBS disease through maternal antibody transfer via the placenta and/or breastmilk. One candidate is a type III capsular polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine; in a phase 2 randomized controlled trial, this vaccine induced significantly higher GBS type-III specific IgG and significantly delayed maternal GBS colonization with GBS type III, compared to women receiving control tetanus toxoid only82. Another candidate is a hexavalent GBS conjugate vaccine targeting the most frequent disease-causing GBS serotypes: Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V. In phase 1/2 trials, this vaccine induced robust immunoglobin responses that persisted for at least 6 months83. Other candidate vaccines target protein subunits, specifically alpha-like proteins (Alp) associated with the GBS capsular surface84,85. These candidate GBS vaccines require significant additional scrutiny, particularly with regard to reduction of maternal colonization rates and neonatal GBS disease. Randomized controlled trials may require use of surrogate clinical endpoints for neonatal disease, given that the relatively low incidence of EOGBS disease would require very large trial enrollment to demonstrate vaccine efficacy. These surrogate endpoints may include correlates of protection present in maternal and neonatal sera86.
Understand the epidemiology of early- and late-onset neonatal GBS disease.
Understand the pathogenesis of perinatal GBS disease
Review obstetric guidelines for GBS screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.
Understand approaches to management of infants at risk of GBS disease, including postnatal risk stratification and management of confirmed infections
EVIDENCE/SUMMARY.
Invasive neonatal GBS disease now most frequently occurs as a late-onset process (on or after day 7 of age); incidence of early-onset GBS disease (occurring during days 0–6 of age) has declined in the setting of contemporary intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis utilization. (Based on evidence from research)
Early-onset GBS disease is caused by vertical transmission of GBS from colonized mothers to their infants; late-onset GBS disease may be acquired via vertical transmission or via horizontal transmission from nosocomial and/or nonmaternal community sources. (Based on strong evidence from research and expert consensus)
Maternal receipt of GBS-specific intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis reduces maternal GBS colonization burden and neonatal early-onset GBS disease. (Based on strong evidence from research and consensus guidelines).
For the purposes of stratification of neonatal GBS risk at birth, exposure to intrapartum penicillin, ampicillin, or cefazolin constitutes “adequate” GBS prophylaxis. Intrapartum exposure to vancomycin or clindamycin is considered inadequate prophylaxis against neonatal GBS disease. (Based on some evidence from research and consensus guidelines).
At birth, all newborns require an individualized clinical assessment of their risk for early-onset GBS disease. Multiple acceptable risk-assessment strategies are available to neonatal clinicians. (Based on strong evidence from research and consensus guidelines).
Infants surviving neonatal GBS disease, particularly those with GBS meningitis, are at significant risk for neurodevelopmental sequelae and should receive close developmental follow-up. (Based on evidence from research).
Author Disclosures:
Dr. Coggins is supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (T32HL007891). Dr. Puopolo reports receiving research funding from the National Institutes of Health, from two contracts with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The authors have no financial relationships or conflicts of interest relevant to this article. This commentary discusses GBS vaccines currently in clinical trials.
Abbreviations:
- AAP
American Academy of Pediatrics
- ACOG
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- EOGBS
Early-onset group B Streptococcus disease
- EOS
Early-onset sepsis
- GBS
Group B Streptococcus
- IAP
Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis
- LOGBS
Late-onset group B Streptococcus disease
- NAAT
Nucleic acid amplification testing
- NDI
Neurodevelopmental impairment
- NICU
Neonatal intensive care unit
- NRN
Neonatal Research Network
Footnotes
Objectives:
Content Specifications:
Domain 2B: Neonatal care
Domain 8A.1: Infectious Diseases, bacteria
Domain 8B.1: Infectious Diseases, prenatally acquired infections
Education/Practice Gaps: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of invasive infection in neonates and young infants. Clinicians must be familiar with obstetric approaches to mitigating neonatal GBS disease, as well as the management of neonates at risk for GBS disease. Clinicians should understand how mechanisms of pathogen transmission, risk factors, and clinical presentation may differ between infants with early- and late-onset GBS disease.
REFERENCES
- 1.Stoll BJ, Puopolo KM, Hansen NI, et al. Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis 2015 to 2017, the Rise of Escherichia coli, and the Need for Novel Prevention Strategies. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(7):e200593–e200593. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Campbell JR, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Ferrieri P, Zaleznik DF, Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal colonization and serotype-specific immunity in pregnant women at delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):498–503. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00977-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Regan JA, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP. The epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization in pregnancy. Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(4):604–610. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2002986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Edwards JM, Watson N, Focht C, et al. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Colonization and Disease among Pregnant Women: A Historical Cohort Study. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2019;2019:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2019/5430493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Committee on Infectious Diseases. Group B Streptococcal Infections. In: Kimberlin, MD, FAAP David W., Barnett, MD, FAAP Elizabeth D., Lynfield, MD, FAAP Ruth, Sawyer, MD Mark H., ed. Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 32nd ed. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2021. doi: 10.1016/B0-72-160537-0/50015-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nanduri SA, Petit S, Smelser C, et al. Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset and Late-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in the United States, 2006 to 2015: Multistate Laboratory and Population-Based Surveillance. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(3):224–233. doi: 10.1001/JAMAPEDIATRICS.2018.4826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schrag SJ, Farley MM, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology of Invasive Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis, 2005 to 2014. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20162013. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schrag SJ, Zywicki S, Farley MM, et al. Group B streptococcal disease in the era of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(1):15–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001063420103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schuchat A, Robinson KD, Plikaytis BD, et al. Multistate case-control study of maternal risk factors for neonatal group B streptococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994;13(7):623–629. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199407000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Report, Emerging Infections Program Network, Group B Streptococcus, 2020. 2020. www.cdc.gov/abcs/downloads/GBS_Surveillance_Report_2020.pdf.
- 11.Madrid L, Seale AC, Kohli-Lynch M, et al. Infant Group B Streptococcal Disease Incidence and Serotypes Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(suppl_2):S160–S172. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Flannery DD, Edwards EM, Puopolo KM, Horbar JD. Early-onset sepsis among very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2021;148(4):2021052456. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2021-052456/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. National Vital Statistics Report, Births: Final Data for 2020. Natl Vital Stat Reports. 2022;70(17). https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/index.htm. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsubara K, Hoshina K, Kondo M, et al. Group B streptococcal disease in infants in the first year of life: a nationwide surveillance study in Japan, 2011–2015. Infection. 2017;45(4):449–458. doi: 10.1007/S15010-017-0995-2/TABLES/3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Doran KS, Nizet V. Molecular pathogenesis of neonatal group B streptococcal infection: no longer in its infancy. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54(1):23–31. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2958.2004.04266.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Furfaro LL, Chang BJ, Payne MS. Perinatal Streptococcus agalactiae Epidemiology and Surveillance Targets. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(4):e00049–18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00049-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lohrmann F, Berg A, Wicker E, et al. Prevalence of Capsular Serotype, Pilus Island Distribution, and Antibiotic Resistance in Pediatric and Adult Invasive Group B Streptococcus Isolates: Data from a Nationwide Prospective Surveillance Study in Germany. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2020;40(1):76–82. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dillon HC, Khare S, Gray BM. Group B streptococcal carriage and disease: A 6-year prospective study. J Pediatr. 1987;110(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(87)80283-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Baker CJ, Barrett FF. Transmission of group B streptococci among parturient women and their neonates. J Pediatr. 1973;83(6):919–925. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(73)80524-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yow MD, Leeds LJ, Thompson PK, Mason EO, Clark DJ, Beachler CW. The natural history of group B streptococcal colonization in the pregnant woman and her offspring. I. Colonization studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;137(1):34–38. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90382-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berardi A, Rossi C, Creti R, et al. Group B Streptococcal Colonization in 160 Mother-Baby Pairs: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1099–1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/J.JPEDS.2013.05.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Anthony BF, Okada DM, Hobel CJ. Epidemiology of group B Streptococcus: longitudinal observations during pregnancy. J Infect Dis. 1978;137(5):524–530. doi: 10.1093/infdis/137.5.524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boyer KM, Gadzala CA, Kelly PD, Burd LI, Gotoff SP. Selective Intrapartum Chemoprophylaxis of Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease. II. Predictive Value of Prenatal Cultures. J Infect Dis. 1983;148(5):802–809. doi: 10.1093/INFDIS/148.5.802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boyer KM, Gadzala CA, Kelly PD, Gotoff SP. Selective intrapartum chemoprophylaxis of neonatal group B streptococcal early-onset disease. III. Interruption of mother-to-infant transmission. J Infect Dis. 1983;148(5):810–816. doi: 10.1093/infdis/148.5.810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yow MD, Mason EO, Gardner SE, Clark DJ, Leeds LJ, Thompson PK. Ampicillin Prevents Intrapartum Transmission of Group B Streptococcus. JAMA. 1979;241(12):1245–1247. doi: 10.1001/JAMA.1979.03290380021019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Russell NJ, Seale AC, O’Sullivan C, et al. Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease With Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(suppl_2):S152–S159. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ancona RJ, Ferrieri P, Williams PP. Maternal factors that enhance the acquisition of group-B streptococci by newborn infants. J Med Microbiol. 1980;13(2):273–280. doi: 10.1099/00222615-13-2-273/CITE/REFWORKS [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Benitz WE, Gould JB, Druzin ML. Risk Factors for Early-onset Group B Streptococcal Sepsis: Estimation of Odds Ratios by Critical Literature Review. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6):e77–e77. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.103.6.E77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Baker CJ, Carey VJ, Rench MA, et al. Maternal Antibody at Delivery Protects Neonates From Early Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(5):781. doi: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIT549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baker CJ, Kasper DL. Correlation of maternal antibody deficiency with susceptibility to neonatal group B streptococcal infection. N Engl J Med. 1976;294(14):753–756. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197604012941404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Puopolo KM, Madoff LC, Eichenwald EC. Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in the Era of Maternal Screening. Pediatrics. 2005;115(5):1240–1246. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2004-2275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Van Dyke MK, Phares CR, Lynfield R, et al. Evaluation of Universal Antenatal Screening for Group B Streptococcus. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(25):2626–2636. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berardi A, Rossi C, Lugli L, et al. Group B streptococcus late-onset disease: 2003–2010. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):e361–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bartlett AW, Smith B, George CRR, et al. Epidemiology of Late and Very Late Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease: Fifteen-Year Experience from Two Australian Tertiary Pediatric Facilities. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(1):20–24. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ecclesia FG, Alonso Cadenas JA, Gómez B, Gangoiti I, Hernández-Bou S, de la Torre Espí M. Late-onset Group B Streptococcus Bacteremia Evaluated in the Pediatric Emergency Department and Risk Factors for Severe Infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2022;41(6):455–459. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brandolini M, Corbella M, Cambieri P, et al. Late-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease associated with breast milk transmission: molecular typing using RAPD-PCR. Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(SUPPL.1):S84–S86. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3782(14)70025-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ching NS, Buttery JP, Lai E, et al. Breastfeeding and Risk of Late-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease. Pediatrics. 2021;148(3):e2020049561. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-049561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Filleron A, Lombard F, Jacquot A, et al. Group B streptococci in milk and late neonatal infections: an analysis of cases in the literature. Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(1):F41–F47. doi: 10.1136/ARCHDISCHILD-2013-304362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Easmon CSF, Hastings MJG, Clare AJ, et al. Nosocomial transmission of group B streptococci. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981;283(6289):459–461. doi: 10.1136/BMJ.283.6289.459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal infections. Clin Perinatol. 1997;24(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/s0095-5108(18)30184-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Graux E, Hites M, Martiny D, et al. Invasive group B Streptococcus among non-pregnant adults in Brussels-Capital Region, 2005–2019. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(3):515. doi: 10.1007/S10096-020-04041-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vuillemin X, Hays C, Plainvert C, et al. Invasive group B Streptococcus infections in non-pregnant adults: a retrospective study, France, 2007–2019. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(1):129.e1–129.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nan C, Dangor Z, Cutland CL, Edwards MS, Madhi SA, Cunnington MC. Maternal group B Streptococcus-related stillbirth: a systematic review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(11):1437–1445. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Seale AC, Bianchi-Jassir F, Russell NJ, et al. Estimates of the Burden of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide for Pregnant Women, Stillbirths, and Children. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(suppl_2):S200–S219. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thomsen AC M o rup L, Hansen KB. Antibiotic Elimination of Group-B Streptococci in Urine in Prevention of Preterm Labour. Lancet. 1987;329(8533):591–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90234-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McKenzie H, Donnet ML, Howie PW, Patel NB, Benvie DT. Risk of preterm delivery in pregnant women with group B streptococcal urinary infections or urinary antibodies to group B streptococcal and E. coli antigens. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):107–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13074.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Puopolo KM, Draper D, Wi S, et al. Estimating the Probability of Neonatal Early-Onset Infection on the Basis of Maternal Risk Factors. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1155. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2010-3464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Levent F, Baker CJ, Rench MA, Edwards MS. Early outcomes of group B streptococcal meningitis in the 21st century. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29(11):1009–1012. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181e74c83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Puopolo KM, Lynfield R, Cummings JJ. Management of infants at risk for group B streptococcal disease. Pediatrics. 2019;144(2):e20191881. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2019-1881/38546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Leonidas JC, Hall RT, Beatty EC, Fellows RA. Radiographic findings in early onset neonatal group B streptococcal septicemia. Pediatrics. 1977;59 Suppl(6 Pt 2):1006–1011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/325489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ablow RC, Driscoll SG, Effmann EL, et al. A comparison of early-onset group B steptococcal neonatal infection and the respiratory-distress syndrome of the newborn. N Engl J Med. 1976;294(2):65–70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197601082940201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Karampatsas K, Davies H, Mynarek M, Andrews N, Heath PT, Le Doare K. Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Late-Onset Invasive Group B Streptococcal Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(7):1255–1264. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cools P, Van De Wijgert JHHM, Jespers V, et al. Role of HIV exposure and infection in relation to neonatal GBS disease and rectovaginal GBS carriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13820. doi: 10.1038/S41598-017-13218-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guilbert J, Levy C, Cohen R, Delacourt C, Renolleau S, Flamant C. Late and ultra late onset Streptococcus B meningitis: clinical and bacteriological data over 6 years in France. Acta Pædiatrica. 2010;99(1):47–51. doi: 10.1111/J.1651-2227.2009.01510.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Green PA, Singh KV., Murray BE, Baker CJ. Recurrent group B streptococcal infections in infants: Clinical and microbiologic aspects. J Pediatr. 1994;125(6 PART 1):931–938. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82012-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Moylett EH, Fernandez M, Rench MA, Hickman ME, Baker CJ. A 5-Year Review of Recurrent Group B Streptococcal Disease: Lessons from Twin Infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(2):282–287. doi: 10.1086/313655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fernandez M, Rench MA, Albanyan EA, Edwards MS, Baker CJ. Failure of rifampin to eradicate group B streptococcal colonization in infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001;20(4):371–376. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200104000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yagupsky P, Menegus MA, Powell KR. The changing spectrum of group B streptococcal disease in infants: an eleven-year experience in a tertiary care hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10(11):801–808. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199111000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hussain SM, Luedtke GS, Baker CJ, Schlievert PM, Leggiadro RJ. Invasive group B streptococcal disease in children beyond early infancy. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14(4):278–281. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199504000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cantey JB, Baldridge C, Jamison R, Shanley LA. Late and very late onset group B Streptococcus sepsis: One and the same? World J Pediatr. 2014;10(1):24–28. doi: 10.1007/s12519-014-0450-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Committee on Obstetric Practice. Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Early-Onset Disease in Newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 797. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):e51–e72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fairlie T, Zell ER, Schrag S. Effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):570–577. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280d4f6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Illuzzi JL, Bracken MB. Duration of intrapartum prophylaxis for neonatal group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1254–1265. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000241539.86451.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Viel-Theriault I, Fell DB, Grynspan D, Redpath S, Thampi N. The transplacental passage of commonly used intrapartum antibiotics and its impact on the newborn management: A narrative review. Early Hum Dev. 2019;135:6–10. doi: 10.1016/J.EARLHUMDEV.2019.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Berardi A, Spada C, Vaccina E, Boncompagni A, Bedetti L, Lucaccioni L. Intrapartum beta-lactam antibiotics for preventing group B streptococcal early-onset disease: can we abandon the concept of “inadequate” intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(1):37–46. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1697233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nanovskaya T, Patrikeeva S, Zhan Y, Fokina V, Hankins GDV, Ahmed MS. Transplacental transfer of vancomycin and telavancin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):331.e1. doi: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2012.06.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hnat MD, Gainer J, Bawdon RE, Wendel GD. Transplacental passage of vancomycin in the ex vivo human perfusion model. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2004;12(2):57. doi: 10.1080/10647440400009821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Onwuchuruba CN, Towers CV., Howard BC, Hennessy MD, Wolfe L, Brown MS. Transplacental passage of vancomycin from mother to neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):352.e1–352.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Towers CV, Weitz B Transplacental passage of vancomycin. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(8):1021–1024. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1306049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Muller AE, Mouton JW, Oostvogel PM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of Clindamycin in Pregnant Women in the Peripartum Period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(5):2175. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01017-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Wear CD, Towers CV., Brown MS, Weitz B, Porter S, Wolfe L. Transplacental passage of clindamycin from mother to neonate. J Perinatol. 2016;36(11):960–961. doi: 10.1038/JP.2016.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Teatero S, Ferrieri P, Martin I, Demczuk W, CGeer A, Fittipaldi N. Serotype Distribution, Population Structure, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Group B Streptococcus Strains Recovered from Colonized Pregnant Women. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(2):412. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01615-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sabroske EM, Iglesias MAS, Rench M, et al. Evolving antibiotic resistance in Group B Streptococci causing invasive infant disease: 1970–2021. Pediatr Res. November 2022:1–5. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02375-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ, Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases C for DC and P (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-10):1–36. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5910a1.htm. Accessed October 11, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases. ABCs Bact Facts Interactive Data Dashboard. Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs). https://www.cdc.gov/abcs/bact-facts-interactive-dashboard.html. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE. Management of neonates born at ≥35 0/7 weeks’ gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):20182894. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2018-2894/37522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Flannery DD, Ross RK, Mukhopadhyay S, Tribble AC, Puopolo KM, Gerber JS. Temporal Trends and Center Variation in Early Antibiotic Use Among Premature Infants. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(1):e180164. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Puopolo KM, Benitz WE, Zaoutis TE. Management of neonates born at ≤34 6/7 weeks’ gestation with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20182896. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kohli-Lynch M, Russell NJ, Seale AC, et al. Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Children After Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(suppl_2):S190–S199. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Libster R, Edwards KM, Levent F, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Group B Streptococcal Meningitis. Pediatrics. 2012;130(1):e8–e15. doi: 10.1542/PEDS.2011-3453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Puopolo KM, Mukhopadhyay S, Hansen NI, et al. Group B Streptococcus Infection in Extremely Preterm Neonates and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 2 Years. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75(8):1405–1415. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hillier SL, Ferrieri P, Edwards MS, et al. A Phase 2, Randomized, Control Trial of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Type III Capsular Polysaccharide-tetanus Toxoid (GBS III-TT) Vaccine to Prevent Vaginal Colonization With GBS III. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(12):2079–2086. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Absalon J, Segall N, Block SL, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel hexavalent group B streptococcus conjugate vaccine in healthy, non-pregnant adults: a phase 1/2, randomised, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, dose-escalation trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(2):263. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30478-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pawlowski A, Lannergård J, Gonzalez-Miro M, et al. A group B Streptococcus alpha-like protein subunit vaccine induces functionally active antibodies in humans targeting homotypic and heterotypic strains. Cell Reports Med. 2022;3(2):100511. doi: 10.1016/J.XCRM.2022.100511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dangor Z, Kwatra G, Pawlowski A, et al. Association of infant Rib and Alp1 surface protein N-terminal domain immunoglobulin G and invasive Group B Streptococcal disease in young infants. Vaccine. 2023;41(10):1679. doi: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2023.01.071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Vekemans J, Crofts J, Baker CJ, et al. The role of immune correlates of protection on the pathway to licensure, policy decision and use of group B Streptococcus vaccines for maternal immunization: considerations from World Health Organization consultations. Vaccine. 2019;37(24):3190. doi: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2019.04.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
