Abstract
The eastern region of Indonesia is endemic to malaria, a tropical parasitic infection that causes significant mortality. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) encompass the global commitment to prevent and eliminate malaria by the end of 2030. Nevertheless, the biggest issue lies in the antimalarial drug resistance in Indonesia. Genetic polymorphism has been a considerable factor in the mechanism of antimalarial drug resistance of which could lead to inadequate activity of antimalarial drugs to undertake Plasmodium infection by several molecular mechanisms. Hence, first-line therapy for malaria in Indonesia such as dihydroartemisinin, piperaquine, and primaquine, becomes ineffective. However, the resistance is unavoidable. This review aims to summarize the genetic polymorphism possible mechanisms contributing to antimalarial resistance in the Indonesian population and to discuss the potential new antimalarial drug candidates.
Keywords: Antimalarial resistance, dihydroartemisinin, eastern Indonesia, imidazole, polymorphism
Introduction
Malaria is an infectious disease that causes hematological disorders leading to death but the disease is often neglected in tropical countries including Indonesia where the disease is endemic [1,2]. Malaria is caused by the Plasmodium parasite that is transmitted through the bite of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes [2]. Four Plasmodium species are commonly associated with human infections: P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, and P. malariae. In Southeast Asia, a fifth species, P. knowlesi can rarely infect humans and result in severe illness. However, it primarily affects non-human primates. P. falciparum is the most hazardous, exhibiting the highest incidence of complications and fatalities [2]. P. falciparum can have dangerous consequences, such as brain fever and death [1]. The vast majority of global malaria-related health issues are attributed to P. falciparum and to a lesser extent, P. vivax [3,4]. The malaria mortality rate due to P. falciparum was reported higher than P. vivax [5], because of its ability to develop severe anemia infecting all development stages of red blood cells [6]. The fatality rate is substantial (ranging from 15% to 25%) and those who survive may experience lasting neurological impairments [7].
Accurate and rapid diagnosis is crucial for effective malaria treatment, control, and elimination. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prompt malaria diagnosis in all patients through rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). The vast majority of RDTs used worldwide are based on detecting P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2). However, there is an issue when some isolates of P. falciparum lack the Pfhrp2 gene, which can result in false negative results in RDTs [8]. In fact, Indonesia experienced a 30% decrease in diagnosing malaria cases in 2020 [9]. The treatment of malaria also plays a crucial role in efforts to reduce the severity and spread of malaria. Unfortunately, incorrect usage has contributed to the widespread development of resistance to these medications [10].
Instead of becoming a public health concern, malaria could be a concern in the military. The world recorded malaria noticeably infected US soldiers during World War II, the Korean War, and Vietnam's conflict [11]. Moreover, relapses and new malaria cases significantly affect military personnel's productivity [12,13]. In the Lao People's Democratic Republic, military personnel in the forest are vulnerable to malaria infection and it is challenging to get the proper diagnosis and self-medication using antibiotics [11]. The Indonesian National Army is also vulnerable to malaria due to frequently operating in endemic areas [12]. Therefore, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) encompass the global commitment to prevent and eliminate malaria by the end of 2030 [13]. Indonesia can potentially serve as a primary research hub for the disease due to its ability to significantly reduce malaria prevalence from 2003 to 2010 [14].
Although the malaria morbidity rate has decreased globally from 78.85 to 24.5 per 100,000 population in 2016–2018, the emerging resistance is concerning [5,13]. Antimalarial drug resistance was found in over 25% of Indonesia during the last decade, including artemisinin, the first line for malaria treatment [15]. Antimalarial drug resistance is defined by the ability of Plasmodium parasites to survive under proper antimalarial drug treatment in the customarily recommended dose without any absorption disorder [16]. Genetic polymorphism is one reason behind the rise of antimalarial drug resistance [17]. A previous study has identified genetic polymorphisms of the P. falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 (Pfmdr1) gene that attenuate accumulation concentration levels in parasites for dihydroartemisinin (DHA), chloroquine, mefloquine, lumefantrine, quinine, and mono-desethyl-amodiaquine. The Pfmdr1 gene encodes p-glycoprotein homolog 1 (Pgh-1), an ATP-dependent efflux pump for antimalarial drugs [18]. Several genetic polymorphisms protect host cells against malaria such as human red blood cell polymorphisms (GYPCΔex3, CR1, CD35, G6PD), ADAMTS13 genetic polymorphisms, immune system genetic polymorphisms (T regulatory cells, toll-like receptors, T helper, interleukin-13), and the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) polymorphisms [19]. The GYPCΔex3 genetic polymorphism invasively protects a subset of the parasite by associating merozoite erythrocyte-binding antigen 140 (EBA-140) [19]. Antibodies targeting EBA-140 suppressed the invasion of Plasmodium [20]. Another mechanism involves inhibiting merozoite entry into red blood cells, disrupting intracellular parasite growth, and preventing erythrocyte lysis that occurs with parasite maturation, leading to the release of merozoites into the bloodstream [19]. Furthermore, the diversity of ethnicities and regions contributes to genetic variability and polymorphisms involving antimalarial drug regimens [21].
The genetic polymorphisms of Pfmdr1, which were associated with antimalarial resistance respectively in P. vivax parasites, were reported in most patients from northeastern Myanmar [21]. On the other hand, studies in the absence of Kelch13-resistant genotypes in P. falciparum isolates from malaria patients in Cameroon were associated with total parasite clearance, high reduction of parasite loads, and resolved symptoms [22]. Other studies concerning polymorphism have reported that genetic variations in the Pfmdr1 and Pfcrt genes are associated with reduced susceptibility to aminoquinoline antimalarial drugs, especially when compared to parasites that have not been exposed [23]. In addition, a study reported the prevalence of polymorphisms in the Pfkelch13, Pfcrt, and Pfmdr1 genes among Chinese migrant workers who returned to Guangxi Province from Africa. However, its finding had no any clinical evidence related to artemisinin resistance but suggested a positive response to chloroquine [24]. A study reported that there were differences in the efficacy of DHA-piperaquine on the genetic polymorphism of FcγRIIA gene between sample populations in several provinces of Indonesia such as Lampung, NTT, North Maluku, and North Sulawesi [25]. The prevalence of Kelch13 mutations and allele diversity has been found to vary in a remote part of eastern Myanmar and this variation is associated with artemisinin resistance [26]. In Africa, out of the 240 patients who were administered intravenous artesunate, 14 exhibited signs of artemisinin resistance in vivo, characterized by a prolonged parasite clearance half-life of more than 5 hours [27]. Among these 14 patients, 13 were infected with P. falciparum parasites carrying mutations in either the A675V or C469Y allele within the Kelch13 gene [27]. The aim of this review is to discuss the genetic polymorphisms in Indonesia that contributing to antimalarial drug resistance and to present strategies for overcoming this issue including to discuss the potential new antimalarial drug candidates.
Malaria in Indonesia
Malaria poses a notable public health concern in Indonesia, impacting individuals from diverse age groups and socio-economic statuses. A study has revealed that factors like socio-demographic elements, environmental conditions, economic circumstances, cultural aspects, and behavioral patterns play a pivotal role in shaping the occurrence, intensity, and ultimate results of malaria infections [28]. The majority of Indonesia's population lives in rural areas (57%) compared to urban areas (43%) [29]. The population's age composition consisted of 30% in the young age category (0–14 years old), 65% in the productive age range (15–64 years old), and 5% in the old age group (65 years old and above) [30]. Economically, a study estimated that 73 million Indonesians (32%) lived in poverty in 2006 [31]. Furthermore, the situation in Indonesia's health sector is also worrying of which its number of doctors per population is lower (2 to 15 times fewer) than other countries [30]. These demographics can contribute to the risk of malaria outbreaks in several ways. Infants, children below the age of 5, and pregnant women have an elevated vulnerability to severe malaria symptoms and a greater likelihood of mortality because their immune systems are not fully developed or are weakened by pregnancy [32-34]. The risk of malaria transmission and the severity of the disease can be heightened by poverty and restricted healthcare access. Insufficient housing and a lack of proper sanitation in impoverished living conditions can additionally facilitate the proliferation of malaria [34]. Elevated population density, particularly in urban regions, can heighten the risk of malaria transmission because it creates a conducive environment for the proliferation of malaria-carrying mosquitoes [35,36].
Over 65 million people in Indonesia still live in malaria-endemic areas [37]. With Asmat's prevalence of 12.4%, this endemic area became the target of the Indonesian malaria elimination program [38]. The most common malaria parasites found were P. falciparum and P. vivax, with the median prevalence of 5% and 3%, respectively, in the eastern region of Indonesia [39]. Malaria outbreaks occurred almost every year in Indonesia with an increasing number of cases. Malaria cases reached 19,483 in 1998–1999, killing 66 individuals [40]. Between 2000 and 2005, the total number of cases increased to 58,152 cases and 536 deaths [41]. Malaria cases decreased during the years 2006 and 2007, with 3,705 and 1,664 cases, respectively [41-44]. At the national level, in 2021, 347 districts or cities, constituting 67.51% of the overall total were declared malaria-free. During the same year, Indonesia documented a total of 304,607 malaria instances, with the most significant concentration recorded in Papua Province, where there were 275,243 cases. This was followed by East Nusa Tenggara Province which reported 9,419 cases, and West Papua Province with 7,628 cases [45].
Antimalarial regimen in Indonesia and its emerging resistance problem
The malaria treatments used in Indonesia were chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine based on national guidelines [39]. A study revealed P. falciparum resistance to chloroquine in eastern Indonesia was significantly higher than in western Indonesia, with in vivo and in vitro data was 56% vs 43% and 64% vs 54%, respectively [29]. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance was also reported in Indonesia but was not very significant, with in vivo and in vitro data of 18% and 64%, respectively [29]. P. vivax resistance to chloroquine was also commonly found in eastern Indonesia and was significantly higher than in western Indonesia, with in vivo data of 57% vs 23% [29].
Artemisinin-combination therapy (ACT) and primaquine have been replaced with chloroquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and quinine due to the growing number of cases of antimalarial drug resistance in the past ten years [15,46]. However, ACT and primaquine regimen was given based on the high efficacy of ACT and primaquine in some studies in Indonesia [47-50]. A study from West Papua, Indonesia, reported that using ACT at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg body weight could cure malaria patients due to P. vivax in an abbreviated time if the patient complied [51]. Furthermore, injection and oral ACT reduced the treatment time of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria patients by 20.8% and 18.0% [52]. In addition, a study reported 95% effectiveness of ACT regimens for pediatric malaria patients in West Papua in 2016 [53]. In 2019, the Indonesian Ministry of Health made a policy of using ACT for uncomplicated malaria and intravenous artesunate for severe malaria in all types of plasmodia [54]. As a result, a study showed that the prevalence of hospitalized patients had decreased significantly, especially malaria patients due to P. falciparum [55]. This policy contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of malaria patients in Papua [55].
ACT, with DHA-piperaquine and primaquine, is the standard regimen for treating uncomplicated cases of P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria. However, it is not allowed for infants under 6 months, pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and G6PD-deficient individuals [46]. The mechanism of DHA induces protein damage in the Plasmodium and inhibits protein folding by initiating transcription factors bound to Kelch 13 proteins sensitive to DHA [56]. Resulting in disturbing protein folding progress and then triggering a stress response in the endoplasmic reticulum of the Plasmodium [56]. Consequently, the Plasmodium life cycle is discontinued. DHA also inhibits proteasomes in Plasmodium by generating protein breakdown in amino acid homeostasis and inhibits important cellular factors to diminish Plasmodium sp. infection [57].
Primaquine is another drug of choice for antimalarial, particularly in Indonesia. The liver metabolizes primaquine through two steps: (1) primaquine is oxidized into hydroxy metabolite by the enzyme CYP2D6, and (2) the hydrogenase-like carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase enzyme induced the second oxidation for hydroxy metabolite into quinonimines and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The human cytochrome P450 reductase (huCPR) enzyme provides quinine electrons through flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactors, converting it back to hydroxy metabolite [58]. This cycle continuously brings in H2O2 to the liver and bone marrow, thus the accumulation of H2O2 leads to the death of Plasmodium parasites in the liver [58].
Antimalarial medications are vital tools in the battle against malaria, but their effectiveness is being undermined by the emergence of drug resistance [59]. This persistent drug resistance poses a significant hurdle to malaria control and puts at risk the renewed hopes for eradicating the disease [60]. The rise of resistance to antimalarial drugs has become a primary threat to the ongoing efforts to control malaria [61]. The development of drug resistance stands as one of the most formidable obstacles to malaria control, leading to an increase in both the incidence and death rates associated with malaria [62]. The impact of resistance on disease incidence and mortality is often underestimated [62]. Anticipating the emergence and spread of resistance to current antimalarials and newly introduced compounds is imperative for planning malaria control strategies and implementing measures that may delay the onset of drug resistance [63].
Mechanism of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) resistance in Indonesia
DHA, a derivative of artemisinin, is part of a class of drugs used in the treatment of malaria caused by P. falciparum [64]. It rapidly converts into DHA within the bloodstream, demonstrating 5 to 10 times greater effectiveness against malaria than artemisinin and its other variants [64]. DHA tends to accumulate predominantly within red blood cells, with infected red blood cells accumulating approximately 300 times more DHA than their uninfected counterparts [65]. The action of DHA seems to involve the production of free radicals that damage the parasite's cell membrane. This leads to the rapid destruction of all stages of malaria parasites [65].
One of the mechanisms of DHA resistance involves the efflux pump, a protein responsible for expelling drugs from the parasite's cells [66]. This efflux pump can diminish the concentration of DHA inside the parasite, thereby reducing its effectiveness [67]. Tolerance to DHA refers to the parasite's ability to survive exposure to the drug at concentrations that would typically be lethal [68-70]. The relationship between tolerance and the efficacy of DHA is intricate and multifaceted, encompassing various metabolic and cellular factors [68-70]. Factors that may contribute to tolerance include the upregulation of genes associated with apicoplast metabolism and the downregulation of genes involved in the drug's uptake and activation [68-70]. The development of tolerance can result in reduced DHA efficacy and contribute to the emergence of resistance [71].
Genetic polymorphism and antimalarial resistance in Indonesia
The issue of genetic variation and resistance to antimalarial treatments in Indonesia is highly significant due to the considerable threat it presents to the effectiveness of the nation's malaria control efforts [72]. Genetic variations in specific genes linked to drug resistance have been recognized as a primary factor contributing to antimalarial resistance in the Greater Mekong Sub-region, encompassing Indonesia [73]. Kelch13 proteins play a critical role in DHA's drug mechanism of action. Its mutations induce the onset of drug resistance, the two pathway mechanisms are presented in Figure 1. The first pathway is the C580Y mutation which is correlated to the increased levels of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PfPI3K) and lipid phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) in P. falciparum. Hence, the failure to carry out PfPI3K proteolysis results in DHA resistance [74]. The second pathway is by the mutation in the Kelch 13 protein compartment, preventing endocytosis of the host cell, and DHA resistance occurs [75].
Figure 1. Kelch13 mutation pathways inducing drug resistance. (A) C580Y mutation. The elevated levels of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PfPI3K) and lipid phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) in Plasmodium falciparum lead to dihydroartemisinin (DHA) resistance due to the inability to perform PfPI3K proteolysis. (B) Kelch 13 protein compartment mutation. The second pathway involves Kelch13 gene mutations, which block host cell endocytosis and result in DHA resistance.
Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP 1) is also similar to Kelch 13 protein, its mutations can also lead to artemisinin resistance. Mutations in KEAP 1 proteins induce the protein damage encoded by KEAP1 and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) genes, which reduces the oxidative stress response of the Plasmodium and avoids death (Figure 2) [76].
Figure 2. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) resistance mechanisms linked to mutations in Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP 1). Mutations in KEAP1 protein can lead to artemisinin resistance, similar to Kelch 13 protein, by causing protein damage encoded by KEAP1 and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) genes, thereby diminishing Plasmodium's oxidative stress response and preventing its death.
A study reported FcγRIIA polymorphisms in the Indonesian population from different cities, including Lampung, Southwest Sumba, South Halmahera, Sikka, and Southeast Minahasa [25]. Genotypes R/R, R/H, and H/H reported in the study exhibited the presence of the R and H alleles, polymorphisms in these alleles are associated with density parasitemia; red blood cells infected with Plasmodium. Parasite density is classified into high and low density. High-density parasitemia occurs when the density of parasites in red blood cells counts more than 5,000 parasites/μL. The number of high-density parasitemia (HDP) prevalence obtained in the reported study was 33, where the H allele is higher than the allele R. The H allele dominates in Eastern
Indonesia (Southwest Sumba, South Halmahera, Sikka, and Southeast Minahasa). In contrast, the R allele dominates among the people in western Indonesia (Lampung). This presents that Eastern Indonesians are more susceptible to malaria compared to the western region of Indonesia [25]. Based on the study findings, the H allele could affect the efficacy of DHA by FcγRIIA polymorphisms causing susceptibility to Plasmodium infection due to ineffective antibodies (Figure 3). Table 1 summarizes the mechanisms of DHA resistance and the responsible polymorphisms. The mutations not only affect DHA drug metabolism but also have implications for inhibiting parasite proteolysis by PfPI3K, disrupting host cell endocytosis, reducing the Plasmodium oxidative stress response, and impeding merozoite degradation.
Figure 3. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) resistance pathway associated with FcγRIIA gene mutation. Susceptibility to Plasmodium infection is a result of FcγRIIA polymorphisms leading to the ineffectiveness of antibodies.
Table 1. Summary of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) resistance.
| Polymorphisms | Mechanism effected | References |
|---|---|---|
| C580Y mutation in Kelch13 | The elevation of PfPI3K and PI3P levels has implications for the inability to bind PfPI3K that has been polyubiquitinated with Kelch 13 protein, subsequently hindering the inhibition of PfPI3K proteolysis. | [74] |
| The endocytosis of the host cell is unfeasible. In the absence of host cell endocytosis, DHA becomes resistant. | [75] | |
| Mutation in KEAP1 | Disrupt the interaction between the protein encoded by KEAP1 and Nrf2, thereby diminishing the Plasmodium oxidative stress response. This occurs because Plasmodium resides within cells. | [76] |
| G1937A mutation in CYP2D6*4 C34T mutation in CYP2D6*10 | Poor and intermediate metabolizers | [77,78] |
| FcγRlla-R131 and FcγRlla-H131 mutations in FcγRlla | The eradication of merozoites within red blood cells is disrupted, resulting in the persistence of Plasmodium infection within the red blood cells. | [25] |
Table 2. Antimalarial natural products.
| Natural product | Study design | Result | Mechanism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) Andrographis paniculata leaf extract | Plasmodium is cultivated in vitro in human O+ red blood cells and diluted to a 1% hematocrit in roswell park memorial institute (RPMI) 1640 medium with gentamycin (20 g/mL), 23.78 mM NaHCO3, 7.68 mM Hepes buffer, and 10% human O+ red blood cell serum. The observed parameter requires evaluating the number of infected red blood cells within a 1000-cell sample. | IC50 value suggests hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) Andrographis paniculata leaf extract’s effectiveness as an antiplasmodium agent against chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum strain G-2300. | Interfering with the cell membrane of the parasite and preventing it from generating new cells. | [84,85] |
| Dendrophthoe pentandra extract | The study involves 60 Swiss strain white mice as its subjects, which were subsequently infected with P. berghei. The experimental solution was given over a span of 4 days and the parameter under observation involves determining parasitemia levels. | The findings indicate that the extract derived from Dendrophthoe pentandra exhibits antiplasmodium properties, with an effective dose (ED50) of 146.2 mg/kg of body weight. | Inhibition of the folate pathway or influencing DNA synthesis. | [86] |
| Isolate bark Lannea coromandelica | The evaluation of parasite growth in a controlled culture by employing hypoxanthine isotopes. After a 60-hour incubation with healthy, uncontaminated cultures, a combination of 50 ml of roswell park memorial institute (RPMI) and serum containing 0.25 pCi of isotopes was introduced. The culture was then mixed thoroughly and subjected to an additional 12-hour incubation at 37°C, making it a total of 72 hours of incubation. Parasites were subsequently collected using a semi-automated cell harvesting technique and the incorporation of radiolabel was determined using a Liquid Scintillation Analyzer. | The study’s findings reveal that the ethyl acetate isolate exhibits a moderate level of antiplasmodium activity, with an IC50 value of 2,727 pg/ml. | Chelating cations to block various nucleic acid synthesis processes, disrupt protein synthesis, and impede the new permeation pathway (NPP) in infected erythrocyte membranes . | [87] |
| Carica papaya leaf extract | The experiment involved testing the in vitro antimalarial activity against P. falciparum strain G2300 using an extract from papaya leaves dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The testing was conducted on a flat titration plate with 24 wells, using a 1% parasitemia level and a hematocrit of 5%. Subsequently, the percentage of parasitemia and growth percentage was calculated. | The antimalarial test outcomes for papaya leaves of the Cibinong variety indicate an IC50 value of 2.7821 nanograms/milliliter, while the Solo variety of papaya demonstrates an IC50 of 2.14279. | Chelating cations to block various nucleic acid synthesis processes, disrupt protein synthesis, and impede the new permeation pathway (NPP) in infected erythrocyte membranes | [88] |
| Methanol extract of Alstonia scholaris bark | Methanol extracts from various plant species were subjected to desiccation and employed for evaluating their biological activity as antiplasmodial agents in an in vivo context. The in vivo appraisal of antiplasmodial efficacy was carried out through a 4-day suppressive test on Swiss mice that had been infected with P. | The in vivo assessment of antiplasmodial activity using methanol extract from Alstonia scholaris tree bark yielded an effective dose (ED50) of 29.78 mg/kg body weight, classifying it as excellent. | .Chelating cations to block various nucleic acid synthesis processes | [89] |
| berghei. These mice were categorized into control groups (those lacking test substances) and treatment groups, with each group comprising 5 mice. |
Natural products as new antimalarial drug candidates
The need for new antimalarial drug candidates has risen as a result of increasing resistance to existing drugs [79]. Natural products are considered promising reservoirs of potential candidates due to their wide array of chemical structures and biological effects [80]. The ethyl acetate and methanol extract of the Callistemon citrinus plant showed antiplasmodial activity with a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of around 8.4–13.0 μg/mL [81]. Helianthus annuus roots also revealed antimalarial activity, proven through in vivo and in vitro tests by evaluating β-hematin levels, results reported to inhibit heme detoxification [82]. A study conducted on herbal-based traditional medicine in Papua Island, Indonesia, reported that Alstonia scholaris L., Carica papaya L., Andrographis paniculata, and Physalis minima L. were often used as antimalarials [83].
Plasmodium is a parasite carried by female Anopheles mosquitoes. In the form of sporozoites, they enter the bloodstream while mosquitoes release saliva to prevent blood clotting, making it easier for them to feed on human blood. These sporozoites travel to liver hepatocyte cells where they multiply asexually to form merozoites [90]. Antimalarial drug resistance appears after the sporozoite successfully infects the liver. A new mechanism has been identified in inhibiting sporozoites from bonding with any of the receptors in hepatocyte cells, one of them is CD81 with a binding site of helix D. This receptor is related to HCV and malaria. The receptor interacts with hepatitis C virus-E2 (HCV-E2) when infecting the liver and induces hepatitis C disease [91]. It also interacts with sporozoite in hepatocytes when it develops into merozoite [92]. The 21 amino acid sequences and the D137 amino acid are crucial for the binding of CD81 to the circumsporozoite protein [93]. Therefore, if a chemical compound inhibits the binding site, sporozoites cannot infect the liver. Imidazole is a chemical agent that can inhibit the binding of sporozoites to CD81 [91]. First, imidazole will be synthesized into N,N-substituted imidazole-4,5-dicarboxamides (I45DCs), which resemble helix D. Sporozoite will recognize I45DCs as CD81 and binds to it, consequently, refraining the sporozoite from infecting the liver (Figure 4). Additionally, there may be sufficient time for antibodies to phagocytose the sporozoite.
Figure 4. Competitive antagonism mechanism of imidazole against Plasmodium at the CD81 receptor. Sporozoites identify I45DCs through CD81 and attach to them, which, in turn, prevents the sporozoite from infecting the liver.
Imidazole has been isolated from the plant roots of Lepidium meyenii, L. culinaris, and Sponge dercitus (Halinastra) japonensis [94-96]. A root extract from Lepidium meyenii has yielded two recently discovered imidazole alkaloids. These compounds have been identified as 1,3-dibenzyl-4,5-dimethylimidazolium chloride (1) and 1,3-dibenzyl-2,4,5-trimethylimidazolium chloride (2) [94]. A new imidazole sulfate was isolated from the sponge [95]. 5-Dimethylamino-naphtalene-1-sulphonyl-Imidazole was obtained from the seeds of Lens culinaris [96]. Several other studies have conducted extractions or isolations of imidazole from plants commonly found in Indonesia, namely Zingiber officinale, Annona muricata, Shorea sp., and Melastoma malabathricum L. [97-100].
Conclusion
Kelch 13 protein polymorphism responsible for DHA resistance in Papua, Indonesia. FcγRIIA polymorphism was also a contributing factor in susceptibility to Plasmodium infection due to the ineffectiveness of antibodies. In the light of imidazole, this sparks a new strategy in discovering novel compounds for antimalarial, possibly exploring Indonesia's biodiversity for further research. It inhibits the binding of sporozoites to CD81 hence presumably a key step in the malaria infection process. Furthermore, there might be an adequate timeframe for antibodies to phagocytose the sporozoites. Nevertheless, ensuring the safety and efficacy of imidazole as an antimalarial agent requires further research to clarify the specific molecular interactions involved in sporozoite binding to host cells.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Faculty of Military Pharmacy for all the support and facilities in this research.
Ethics approval
Not required.
Competing interests
All the authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This study received no external funding.
Underlying data
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
How to cite
Permana Y, Wardhani BWK. Grasp of dihydroartemisinin resistance in Indonesia: Focused on genetic polymorphisms and new antimalarial. Narra J 2023; 3 (3): e336 - http://doi.org/10.52225/narra.v3i3.336.
References
- 1.lyazar IR, Hay SI, Baird JK. Malaria distribution, prevalence, drug resistance and control in Indonesia. Adv Parasitol 2011;74:41–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization. International travel and health. Epidemiological Record 1992;67(08):56. [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization.World malaria report. 2022.
- 4.Mace KE, Lucchi NW, Tan KR. Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2017. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan B. Laporan Riset Kesehatan Dasar (RISKESDAS) tahun 2013 dalam bentuk angka 2013.
- 6.Geleta G, Ketema T.. Severe malaria associated with Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax among children in Pawe Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Malar Res Treat 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Suh KN, Kain KC, Keystone JS. Malaria. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004;170(11):1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mayor A, Bassat Q.. “Resistance” to diagnostics: A serious biological challenge for malaria control and elimination. EBioMedicine 2019;50:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.World Health Organization. Accelerating malaria elimination in Indonesia: Revised action plan and bridging the gap 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/indonesia/news/detail/24-07-2023-accelerating-malaria-elimination-in-indonesia--revised-action-plan-and-bridging-the-gap. Accessed: 18 October 2023.
- 10.Fitri LE, Pawestri AR, Winaris N, et al. Antimalarial drug resistance: A brief history of its spread in Indonesia. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023;17:1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vilay P, Nonaka D, Senamonty P, et al. Malaria prevalence, knowledge, perception, preventive and treatment behavior among military in Champasak and Attapeu provinces, Lao PDR: A mixed methods study. Trop Med Health 2019;47(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pratamawati DA, Setiyaningsih R, Barudin K, et al. Potensi penularan malaria pada prajurit tentara nasional indonesia (studi pada batalyon infantri 411 Kota Salatiga). Vektor 2019;11(1):53–62. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Health Organization W. World malaria report 2020 - 20 years of global progress & challenges. 2020.
- 14.Yuningsih R. Malaria center: Sebuah model penguatan sistem pengendalian penyakit malaria di Provinsi Maluku Utara. Aspirasi: J Masalah-Masalah Sosial; 2011;2(2):163–175. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harijanto P. Eliminasi malaria pada era desentralisasi. Buletin Jendela Informasi Kesehatan 2011;1(1):8–23. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Popovici J, Pierce-Friedrich L, Kim S, et al. Recrudescence, reinfection, or relapse? A more rigorous framework to assess chloroquine efficacy for Plasmodium vivax malaria. J Infect Dis 2019;219(2):315–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anindita V, Mutiara H, Mutiara UG. Mutasi Gen Kelch 13 dan resistensi Plasmodium falciparum terhadap obat antimalaria golongan artemisinin. Jurnal Medula 2017;7(5):149–153. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wurtz N, Fall B, Pascual A, et al. Role of Pfmdr1 in in vitro Plasmodium falciparum susceptibility to chloroquine, quinine, monodesethylamodiaquine, mefloquine, lumefantrine, and dihydroartemisinin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;38(12):7032–7040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wahyuni S. Polimorfisme gen pada penyakit malaria. Averrous 2018;2(1):35–44. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maier AG, Duraisingh MT, Reeder JC, et al. Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte invasion through glycophorin C and selection for Gerbich negativity in human populations. Nat Med 2002 9:1 2002;9(1):87–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang F, Li S, Tian P, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in genes associated with drug resistance in Plasmodium vivax parasites from northeastern Myanmar. Malar J 2022;21(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Menard S, Tchoufack JN, Maffo CN, et al. Insight into k13-propeller gene polymorphism and ex vivo DHA-response profiles from Cameroonian isolates. Malar J 2016;15(1):572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dokunmu TM, Olasehinde GI, Oladejo DO, et al. Evaluation of Plasmodium falciparum K13 gene polymorphism and susceptibility to dihydroartemisinin in an endemic area. Biomed Res Ther 2018;5(9):2651–2657. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao H, Pi L, Zhao L, et al. First detection in West Africa of a mutation that may contribute to artemisinin resistance Plasmodium falciparum. Front Genet 2021;12:701750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marantina SS, Syafruddin D, Wibowo H, et al. Hubungan polimorfisme Gen FcγRIIA dengan densitas P. falciparum dan efikasi dihidroartemisinin-piperakuin. J Ked Indones 2016;4(1): 37–43. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bonnington CA, Phyo AP, Ashley EA, et al. Plasmodium falciparum Kelch 13 mutations and treatment response in patients in Hpa-Pun District, Northern Kayin State, Myanmar. Malar J 2017;16(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schmedes SE, Patel D, Dhal S, et al. Plasmodium falciparum kelch 13 mutations, 9 countries in Africa, 2014-2018. Emerg Infect Dis 2021;27(7):1902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hasyim H, Dale P, Groneberg DA, et al. Social determinants of malaria in an endemic area of Indonesia. Malar J 2019;18(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Elyazar IR, Hay SI, Baird JK. Malaria distribution, prevalence, drug resistance and control in Indonesia. Adv Parasitol 2011;74:41–175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Departemen Kesehatan. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2007. 2008.
- 31.Elvidge CD, Sutton PC, Ghosh T, et al. A global poverty map derived from satellite data. Comput Geosci 2009;35(8):1652–1660. [Google Scholar]
- 32.World Health Organization. Malaria 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria. Accessed: 17 October 2023.
- 33.Dye-Braumuller KC, Kanyangarara M.. Malaria in the USA: How vulnerable are we to future outbreaks? Curr Trop Med Rep 2021;8(1):43–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Malaria - Malaria worldwide - Impact of malaria. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/malaria_worldwide/impact.html. Accessed: 17 October 2023.
- 35.Martens P, Hall L.. Malaria on the move: Human population movement and malaria transmission. Emerg Infect Dis 2000;6(2):103–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kabaria CW, Gilbert M, Noor AM, et al. The impact of urbanization and population density on childhood Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence rates in Africa. Malar J 2017;16(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee J, Ryu JS. Current status of parasite infections in Indonesia: A literature review. Korean J Parasitol 2019;57(4):329–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Debora J, Rinonce HT, Pudjohartono MF, et al. Prevalensi malaria di Asmat, Papua: Gambaran situasi terkini di daerah endemik tinggi. J Comm Empowerment Health 2018;1(1):11–19. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Elyazar IRF, Hay SI, Baird JK. Malaria distribution, prevalence, drug resistance and control in Indonesia. Adv Parasitol 2011;74(C):41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marwoto HA Martono. Malaria di Kabupaten Sikka, Flores. Cermin Dunia Kedokt 1991;70:35–41. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Departemen Kesehatan. Profil pengendalian penyakit dan penyehatan lingkungan 2005. Jakarta: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sekartuti Marwoto HA. Peningkatan kasus malaria di Pulau Jawa, Kepulauan Seribu dan Lampung 2003;13:38–47. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Departemen Kesehatan. Profil pengendalian penyakit dan penyehatan lingkungan 2006. Jakarta: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Departemen Kesehatan. Profil pengendalian penyakit dan penyehatan lingkungan 2008. Jakarta: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kemenkes RI. Laporan kinerja 2022. Direktorat pencegahan dan pengendalian penyakit menular 2022.
- 46.Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Buku saku tatalaksana kasus malaria subdit malaria direktorat P2PTVZ Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia 2018.
- 47.Wakum BM, Hasan D.. Uji efikasi kapsul pare-primakuin dan DHP-primakuin serta pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas hidup pasien malaria falsiparum tanpa komplikasi di RSUD Manokwari Tahun 2019. Poltekita 2021;15(2):150–157. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rampengan NH. Terapi malaria pada anak. Jurnal Biomedik: JBM 2015;7(3). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ompusunggu S. Pengobatan malaria vivax dengan pemberian klorokuin dan primakuin secara harian dan paket di Jawa Tengah 1994. Bul Penelit Kesehat 1994;22:46–54. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Arcelia F. Efikasi dihidroartemisinin-piperakuin sebagai pengobatan malaria vivax lini pertama pada anak dan dewasa. Universitas Sumatera Utara. 2020.
- 51.Kinansi RR, Mayasari R, Pratamawati DA. Pengobatan malaria kombinasi artemisinin (ACT) di Provinsi Papua Barat tahun 2013. BALABA 2017;13(1):43–54. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Alathas SAA. Pengaruh pemberian obat anti malaria terhadap lama rawat pasien malaria falsiparum tanpa komplikasi di rumah sakit umum daerah Kabupaten Lahat. Unimus. 2014.
- 53.Wadana CP, Krimadi R, Siregar R, et al. Profil terapi artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) pada malaria anak di RSUD. Scholoo Keyen, Kabupaten Sorong Selatan, Papua Barat Studi Retrospektif. Sari Pediatri 2016;17(5):323–325. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Menteri Kesehatan RI. Keputusan menteri kesehatan republik indonesia nomor HK.01.07/MENKES/556/2019 tentang pedoman nasional pelayanan kedokteran tata laksana malaria. 2019.
- 55.Kenangalem E, Poespoprodjo JR, Douglas NM, et al. Malaria morbidity and mortality following introduction of a universal policy of artemisinin-based treatment for malaria in Papua, Indonesia: A longitudinal surveillance study. PLoS Med 2019;16(5): e1002815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Siddiqui FA, Boonhok R, Cabrera M, et al. Role of Plasmodium falciparum Kelch 13 protein mutations in P. falciparum populations from Northeastern Myanmar in mediating artemisinin resistance. MBio 2020;11(1): e01134–e01119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bridgford JL, Xie SC, Cobbold SA, et al. Artemisinin kills malaria parasites by damaging proteins and inhibiting the proteasome. Nat Commun 2018;9: 3801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Camarda G, Jirawatcharadech P, Priestley RS, et al. Antimalarial activity of primaquine operates via a two-step biochemical relay. Nat Commun 2019;10(1):3226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hanboonkunupakarn B, White NJ. The threat of antimalarial drug resistance. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines 2015;2(1):1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization. Resistance to antimalarials. Available from: https://www3.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2405:resistance-antimalarials&Itemid=0&lang=en#gsc.tab=0. Accessed: 26 October 2023.
- 61.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How can malaria cases and deaths be reduced? - Drug resistance in the Malaria Endemic World 2019.
- 62.White NJ. Antimalarial drug resistance. J Clin Investig 2004;113(8):1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network. Malaria drug resistance worldwide antimalarial resistance network 2023. Available from: https://www.wwarn.org/about-us/malaria-drug-resistance. Accessed: 26 October 2023.
- 64.White NJ. Manson’s tropical infectious diseases. Malaria 2014:532–600.
- 65.Abascal K, Yarnell EL. Artemisia annua (Sweet Wormwood). Textbook of Natural Medicin. 2020: 437–440.
- 66.Noguiera F, Gil JP, Rosário VE. Efflux pumps of antimalarial-resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Antibiotiques 2006;8(2):85–92. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Leroy D. How to tackle antimalarial resistance? EMBO Mol Med 2017;9(2):133–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Krishna S, Bustamante L, Haynes RK, et al. Artemisinins: Their growing importance in medicine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008;29(10):520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rasmussen C, Alonso P, Ringwald P.. Current and emerging strategies to combat antimalarial resistance. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022;20(3):353–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zyad A, Tilaoui M, Jaafari A, et al. More insights into the pharmacological effects of artemisinin. Phytotherapy Research 2018;32(2):216–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Witkowski B, Lelièvre J, Barragán MJL, et al. Increased tolerance to artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by a quiescence mechanism. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54(5):1872–1877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fitri LE, Pawestri AR, Winaris N, et al. Antimalarial drug resistance: A brief history of its spread in Indonesia. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023;17:1995–2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Huang F, Li S, Tian P, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in genes associated with drug resistance in Plasmodium vivax parasites from northeastern Myanmar. Malar J 2022;21(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mbengue A, Bhattacharjee S, Pandharkar T.. A molecular mechanism of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 2015;520:683–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Birnbaum J, Scharf S, Schmidt S, et al. A Kelch13-defined endocytosis pathway mediates artemisinin resistance in malaria parasites. Science (1979) 2020;367(6437):51–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hill KS, McDowell A, McCorkle JR, et al. KEAP1 is required for artesunate anticancer activity in non-small-cell lung cancer. cers (Basel) 2021;13(8):1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sari OP. Analisis polimorfisme CYP2D6* 4 dan CYP2D6* 10 sebagai metabolizer primakuin di rsud Jayapura Papua Indonesia. Medika Kartika 2021;4(2):168–181. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chen N, Dowd S, Gatton ML, et al. Cytochrome P450 2D6 profiles and their relationship with outcomes of primaquine anti-relapse therapy in Australian defence force personnel deployed to Papua New Guinea and East Timor. Malar J 2019;18:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ginsburg H, Deharo E.. A call for using natural compounds in the development of new antimalarial treatments - An introduction. Malar J 2011;10 Suppl 1:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.IRB Barcelona. Analogues of a natural product are drug candidates against malaria. Available from: https://wwwirbbarcelonaorg/en/news/analogues-of-a-natural-product-are-drug-candidates-against-malaria 2014. Accessed: 19 October 2023.
- 81.Larayetan RA, Abdulrazaq Y, Okoh OO. Effect of seasonal variation on the secondary metabolites and antioxidant activity of callistemon citrinus (Curtis) skeels (Myrtaceae) grown in Eastern Cape of South Africa. Asian J Chem 2020;32(3):612–618. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ekasari W, Widya Pratiwi D, Amanda Z, et al. Various parts of helianthus annuus plants as new sources of antimalarial drugs. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019: 2019:7390385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 83.Budiarti M, Maruzy A, Mujahid R, et al. The use of antimalarial plants as traditional treatment in Papua Island, Indonesia. Heliyon 2020;6(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Anas Y, Ratnani RD, Kurniasari L, et al. Aktivitas antiplasmodium ekstrak hidrotropi daun sambiloto (Andrographis paniculata Ness.) secara in vitro pada Plasmodium falciparum strain G-2300 resisten kloroquin. J Ilmu Farmasi Farmasi Klin 2020;17(01):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Resi EM. Effect of antimalaria herbal sambiloto (Andrographis paniculata Nees) on morphology changes of development and parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Jurnal Info Kesehatan 2014. Available from: https://jurnal.poltekeskupang.ac.id/index.php/infokes/article/view/49/50. Accessed: 19 October 2023.
- 86.Faiqoh Z, Agung NNBA, Setia BD, et al. Uji aktivitas antiplasmodium ekstrak benalu secara in vivo pada mencit Galur Swiss. Pekan Ilmiah Mahasiswa Nasional Program Kreativitas Mahasiswa. 2013.
- 87.Tahir KA, Haeria H, Febriyanti AP, et al. Uji aktivitas antiplasmodium dari isolat kulit batang kayu Tammate (Lannea Coromandelica Houtt. Merr.) secara In-Vitro. J Fitofarmaka Indon 2020;7(1):16–21. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rehena JF. Uji aktivitas ekstrak daun pepaya (Carica papaya. LINN) sebagai antimalaria in vitro. J Ilmu Dasar 2010;11(1):96–100. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Atun S, Arianingrum R.. Antiplasmodial activity of methanol extract herbal drug plants in vivo. J Penelit Saintek 2012;17(1). [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tilley L, Dixon MW, Kirk K.. The Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cell. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2011;43(6):839–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.VanCompernolle SE, Wiznycia A V., Rush JR, et al. Small molecule inhibition of hepatitis C virus E2 binding to CD81. Virology. Virology 2003;314(1):371–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Silvie O, Rubinstein E, Franetich JF, et al. Hepatocyte CD81 is required for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium yoelii sporozoite infectivity. Nat Med 2003;9(1):93–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Yalaoui S, Zougbédé S, Charrin S, et al. Hepatocyte permissiveness to Plasmodium infection is conveyed by a short and structurally conserved region of the CD81 large extracellular domain. PLoS Pathog 2008;4(2): e1000010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cui B, Zheng BL, He K, et al. Imidazole alkaloids from Lepidium meyenii. J Nat Prod 2003;66(8):1101–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hirade H, Haruyama T, Kobayashi N, et al. A new imidazole from the sponge Dercitus (Halinastra) japonensis. Nat Prod Commun 2017;12(1):19–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hayman AR, Gray DO. Imidazole, a new natural product from the Leguminosae. Phytochemistry 1987;26(12):3247–3248. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sopian T, Nashrianto H, Iryani A.. Seminar Nasional. Isolasi dan identifikasi alkaloid pada ekstrak daun sirsak (Annona Muricata L.). Seminar Nasional Riset Pangan, Obat-Obatan dan Lingkungan untuk Kesehatan 2017.
- 98.Gusti REP, Zulnely Z.. Karakteristik lemak hasil ekstraksi buah tengkawang asal Kalimantan Barat menggunakan dua macam pelarut. J Penelitian Hasil Hutan 2015;33(3):175–180. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kartina MWA, Adiwena M.. Karakterisasi kandungan fitokimia estrak daun karamunting (Melastoma malabatchricum L.) menggunakan metode gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Biota 2019;4(1):16–23. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Guntari S, Surastri B, Farida H.. Perbandingan efektivitas ekstrak jahe merah (Zingiber officinale var. Rubrum) dengan ketokonazol 2% secara in vitro. Diponegoro Med J 2017;6(2):1228–1236. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.




