Abstract
N-acetylcysteine has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities that could potentially improve the clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. N-acetylcysteine potentially inhibits NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome and results in control oxidative stress and cytokine release in COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of N-acetylcysteine in reducing the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in COVID-19 patients. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted among severe and moderate COVID-19 patients. The treatment group received oral 1200 mg daily of N-acetylcysteine (three times a day) and the standard care for COVID-19, while the control group received standard care for COVID-19 and a placebo. The NLR was determined on the first day of admission and after the seventh day of treatment. A paired Student t-test was used to compare the NLR before and after treatment while independent Student t-test was used to compare the NLR between treatment and control groups. A total of 40 severe and moderate COVID-19 were enrolled, 20 people in each group, with a mean age was 44.68±13.24 years old. The mean NLR on the first day was 9.44 in the treatment group and 8.84 in the control group. After the seventh day, the mean NLR was 4.27 and 11.54 in the treatment group and control group, respectively. The mean changes of NLR (the pre-treatment compared to post-treatment) in the treatment and control group were reduced 4.05 and increased 3.34, respectively. The NLR in treatment group significantly decreased compared to the control group (p<0.001). In conclusion, N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg daily could reduce the NLR in severe and moderate COVID-19 patients.
Keywords: COVID-19, N-acetylcysteine, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, COVID-19 treatment, clinical trial
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory infectious disease caused by the new emerging coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has caused significant health problems [1-4]. COVID-19 still became a health problem in many nations globally [5]. The main concern of COVID-19 is inflammation and cases with evidence of cytokine storm tend to have a high mortality rate [6]. Studies suggested a correlation between cytokine storms and the deterioration of COVID-19 patients [2,6]. Many antiviral agents and immunotherapy are being developed as potential therapies against COVID-19 [7]. However, until now, no definitive treatment for COVID-19 since the development of effective treatment for a new disease is a long and complex process [8-10].
Two viroporins—protein E and ORF3a—are present in SARS-CoV-2 [11]. The E protein participates in a number of signaling processes that ultimately lead to inflammation during infection. Additionally, it plays a part in the syntenin protein-protein interaction that activates the p38 MAPK and the inflammatory NF-kB pathway. The E protein causes lysosomal breakdown and ion redistribution, triggering the NLRP3 (NOD, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing 3) inflammasome [11]. The NLRP3 inflammasome is a critical component of the innate immune system that mediates caspase-1 activation and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1 (IL-1) [12]. Increased production of IL-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is caused by the activation of NLRP3, and this cytokine storm causes inflammation and cellular damage in COVID-19 patients [11]. Since NLRP3 inflammasome plays a critical role in COVID-19 pathogenesis, it is a possible therapeutic target for the treatment of COVID-19 [11].
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of inflammatory conditions [13], and it has been proposed as an independent prognostic indicator for patients with COVID-19 [14]. Moreover, NLR was recently considered a marker for decision-making processes concerning the admission/recovery of patients with COVID-19 [15]. Several studies found that high NLR was associated with the severity of patients with COVID-19 [15-18]. NLR is also a marker for oxidative stress [19].
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a mucolytic drug that is well tolerated and usually used to treat coughing. NAC has been proposed as prevention and therapy for various respiratory system diseases, mainly caused by oxidative stress, one of which is COVID-19 [20]. NAC works by inducing mucus secretion that adheres to the mucosa, increases glutathione S-transferase activity, triggers detoxification, and works directly as a scavenger of free radicals [21]. NAC is a potent antioxidant with a potential therapeutic effect in diseases characterized by increased formation of free oxidant radicals [15]. It also could work as an anti-inflammatory agent by limiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the early stages of immune responses [16]. An in-vitro study using SARS-CoV-2 showed that NAC could inhibit the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome [20]. Unfortunately, the evidence from clinical trials regarding the effect of NAC as an antioxidant and an anti-NLRP3 inflammasome in respiratory tract infections remain limited [22]. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of NAC in improving NLR in severe and moderate COVID-19 patients.
Methods
Study design and registration
This was a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial to assess the improvement of NLR after NAC treatment in patients with COVID-19. Moderate and severe COVID-19 patients were recruited and treated with oral NAC or with placebo. The NLR was determined before and after seven days of treatment. This clinical trial was registered in www.clinicaltrial.gov (number NCT05658549).
The patients, sample size, and sampling
Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with moderate and severe severity at Universitas Sebelas Maret Hospital Kartasura, Indonesia, were recruited through simple random sampling. The inclusion criteria were: (1) a moderate or severe grade of COVID-19 based on WHO classification [23]; (2) aged between 18 and 60 years old; and (3) willing to entice the clinical trial. Patients who had comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or liver disease, and those who died during the treatment period were excluded.
Randomization and blinding
The sample size was determined using the sample size formula by Dahlan [24] for paired numeric analytical research type, with a 5% type I error and 20% type II error. The minimal sample size was 18 patients for each arm. The number was round up to 20 subjects for each group. With simple random sampling approach, the patients were divided into control and treatment groups.
The treatment group received NAC, while the control group received a placebo. NAC and placebo tablets were similar in size and shape, making they were difficult to be distinguished. Patients and investigators did not know whether to get a placebo or NAC. The allocation of treatment and placebo was conducted behind a closed system. The data were opened at the end of the study.
Interventions
The patients within treatment group received standard care of COVID-19 with oral NAC 1200 mg (400 mg three times a day). The control group received COVID-19 standard care and a placebo.
Outcome
The outcome of this study was the NLR of COVID-19 patients. The components of NLR (neutrophile and lymphocyte) were measured using XP-300 Hematology Analyzer (Sysmex, Singapore). The NLR was measured twice for each patient, at the time of admission and after the seventh day of the treatment with NAC. NLR was determined as neutrophil counts (per microliter) divided by the lymphocyte counts per microliter.
Statistical analysis
A paired Student t-test was used to compare the NLR before and after treatment while independent Student t-test was used to compare the NLR between treatment and control groups. The p<0.05 was considerate statistically significant. Data analysis using SPSS v25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Characteristics of the patients
A total of 40 severe and moderate COVID-19 were enrolled and completed clinical trial and the detailed flow diagram of each step from recruitment till analysis is presented in Figure 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. Out of total patients, 22 men (55%) were men, twelve in the treatment group and ten in the control group. The mean age for both groups was 44.68±13.24 years; 42.30±14.88 years in control group and 47.05±11.25 years for treatment group. The mean length of stay for both groups was 11±45 day; 11±5 day in control group and 11±4 day for treatment group. The mean NLR before treatment was 8.84±3.45 in control group and 9.44±6.42 for treatment group. The mean NLR after treatment was 11.54±4.30 and 4.27±3.66 for control and treatment group, respectively. The change of NLR was increased 3.34 in control group and reduced 4.05 for the treatment group.
Figure 1. Consort flow diagram of the clinical trial.
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 patients included in the study.
| Patient characteristics | Group | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment (n=20) Mean±SD | Control (n=20) Mean±SD | ||
| Sex | 0.502 a | ||
| Female | 9 (50%) | 9 (50%) | |
| Male | 12 (55%) | 10 (45%) | |
| Age (year) | 47.05±11.25 | 42.30±14.88 | 0.509 b |
| Length of stay (day) | 11±4 | 11±5 | 0.375 b |
| NLR pre-treatment | 9.44±6.42 | 8.84 ±3.45 | 0.140 b |
| NLR pos-treatment | 4.27±3.66 | 11.54±4.30 | 0.019 b |
| Changes of NLR | 4.05±6.24 | -3.34±3.48 | <0.001 b |
SD: standard deviation
Analyzed using Chi-squared test
Analyzed using independent Student t-test
Comparation of NLR pre- and post-treatment in treatment and control groups
To assess the changes in NLR before and after seven days of treatment of COVID-19 patients within control or treatment group, a paired Student t-test was employed. Our data indicated that the NLR was siginifacntly different between pre- and post-tretment within control and treatment groups (p<0.001). The control group’s mean delta NLR level is negative, indicating a worsening inflammatory condition in control group patients (Figure 2). Meanwhile, the mean delta NLR level of the treatment group NAC 1200mg/day treatment group was positive indicating the decreasing NLR level and an improvement of the inflammatory condition in treatment group patients.
Figure 2. Comparison of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio before and after treatment between the control and treatment groups.
Changes in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio between treatment and control groups
The average value of delta NLR (pre-treatment compared post-treatment) of control group was - 3.34±5.68 while the delta NLR in treatment group was 4.05±7.07 indicating the NLR increased and reduced in control and treatment group, respectively (Figure 3). An independent Student t-test was used to compare for the delta NLR between both groups. Our data indicated a significant different of delta NLR between the control and treatment groups (p<0.001).
Figure 3. The changes of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (pre-treatment compared to post-treatment) in treatment and control groups. The data indicating that the NLR worsen and improved in control and treatment group, respectively.
Discussion
Inflammation is a part of the body’s defense mechanism against infection [25]. Although inflammation plays a role in the healing process, uncontrolled or excessive inflammation conditions that aren’t treated can potentially lead to more severe symptoms and even death. Some inflammatory diseases, especially those caused by infection, require immediate medical treatment [26]. Management of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agents has been proven to relieve inflammatory conditions [27-29].
The NLR seems much more terrific in patients with severe or life-threatening illnesses than in individuals with less severe diseases [16]. NLR is a dependable indicator for predicting COVID-19 illness severity. Several mechanisms regarding neutrophils and lymphocytes’ resistance to Sars-Cov-2 virus infection have been postulated. Neutrophils stimulate the immune system and generate reactive oxygen species, which may trigger cell DNA damage and eliminate viruses that are subsequently targeted by antibodies. Moreover, neutrophils produce the production of many cytokines and effector molecules. On the other hand, although viral infection predominantly induces a lymphocyte response, systemic inflammation with exceptionally high Interleukin 6 paradoxically reduces the number of lymphocytes and the consequent cellular immunity. These two elements enhance NLR. Consequently, a greater NLR forecasts the intensity of inflammation [30].
The mechanism of NAC is anti-inflammatory by suppressing the release of IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, and TNF-α. Through the NF-κB inhibitory pathway, NAC can inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 patients. So NAC decreases the cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients. Meanwhile, primary antioxidants of NAC work to reduce the intensity of intracellular oxidative stress in COVID-19 [23]. The condition of lymphopenia and the decrease in glutathione concentration caused by COVID-19 was also considered to be controlled by administering a high dose of 1200 mg oral NAC, which works by blocking the apoptotic signal of T lymphocytes, which can then increase adaptive immunity. Administration of 1200 mg oral NAC has been shown to reduce ROS production by neutrophils that cause oxidative stress conditions without interfering with the function of neutrophils in phagocytosing SARS-CoV-2 itself. NAC’s ability to effectively deal with oxidative stress prevents other cytokine storms, pulmonary edema, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The results of reports from several case reports, adding NAC to COVID-19 patients can improve the clinical outcomes of these patients [21].
This study suggested that NAC’s anti-inflammation and antioxidant reduced NLR in COVID-19 patients. This could be due to NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition. The inflammasome protein increases in COVID-19 patients because the SARS-CoV-2 activates the TLR2 pathway. A previous in vitro study [20] found that NAC can inhibit inflammasome by suppressing Nf-κB and NLRP3. This study has some limitations. The sample size was relatively small in this preliminary clinical trial. The NAC’s anti-inflammation and antioxidant activities were only assessed using NLR. Some confounding factors such as ethnicity, vaccination number, and viral load were also not controlled in this clinical trial.
Conclusion
N-Acetylcysteine can reduce the NLR level of COVID-19 patients. NAC acts as an anti-inflammation by reviewing the significant decrease in NLR level compared to the control group. According to the study that has been conducted, the results of the treatment of NAC 1200mg/day (three times a day) orally can be used as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant agents to treat hyperinflammatory conditions and oxidative stress in COVID-19 patients.
Acknowledgments
We would thank Universitas Sebelas Maret Hospital, where this research was conducted, and Universitas Sebelas Maret, which also helped partially fund this research.
Ethics approval
The Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. Moewardi Hospital Surakarta has approved this research by approval Number: 149/II/HREC/2021. All participants provided informed consent before the study started.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
Funding for a portion of this study Funding for a part of this study by Institute for Research and Community Service Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia.
Underlying data
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
How to cite
Prabowo NA. Megantara MA, Apriningsih H. The role of N-acetylcysteine in decreasing neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in COVID-19 patients: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Narra J 2023; 3 (2): e121 - http://doi.org/10.52225/narraj.v3i2.121.
References
- 1.Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020;382(13):1199–1207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prabowo NA, Apriningsih H.. Colchicine reduces the degree of inflammation in COVID-19 patients. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2021;824(1):012087. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prabowo NA, Myrtha R, Apriningsih H.. Lupus flares in COVID-19 patients: A case report. Malays J Med Health Sci 2022;18(Supp2):310–312. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fahriani M, Ilmawan M, Fajar JK, et al. Persistence of long COVID symptoms in COVID-19 survivors worldwide and its potential pathogenesis - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Narra J 2021;1(2):e36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lancet The. The COVID-19 pandemic in 2023: far from over. Lancet 2023;401:79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Prabowo NA, Setyaningrum RH, Apriningsih H.. Interleukin 6 associated with adrenal insufficiency in COVID-19 patient. Malays J Med Health Sci 2022;18(Supp2):49–52. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sharun K, Tiwari R, Yatoo MI, et al. A comprehensive review on pharmacologic agents, immunotherapies and supportive therapeutics for COVID-19. Narra J 2022;2(3):e92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McCreary EK, Pogue JM. Coronavirus disease 2019 treatment: A review of early and emerging options. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;7(4):ofaa105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ, Cutrell JB. Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020. Apr 13 [cited 2023 Mar 10]; Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2764727. Accessed: 10 March 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jomah S, Asdaq SMB, Al-Yamani MJ. Clinical efficacy of antivirals against novel coronavirus (COVID-19): A review. J Infect Public Health 2020;13(9):1187–1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shah A. Novel coronavirus-induced NLRP3 Inflammasome activation: A potential drug target in the treatment of COVID-19. Front Immunol 2020;11:1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kelley N, Jeltema D, Duan Y, He Y.. The NLRP3 inflammasome: An overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Turkmen K, Tonbul HZ, Toker A, et al. The Relationship between oxidative stress, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in renal transplant and end-stage renal disease patients. Renal Failure 2012;34(10):1229–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang AP, Liu JP, Tao WQ, Li HM. The diagnostic and predictive role of NLR, d-NLR and PLR in COVID-19 patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;84:106504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buonacera A, Stancanelli B, Colaci M, Malatino L.. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: An emerging marker of the relationships between the immune system and diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. Mar 26;23(7):3636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ciccullo A, Borghetti A, Zileri Dal Verme L, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and clinical outcome in COVID-19: a report from the Italian front line. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(2):106017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71(15):762–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Qu R, Ling Y, Zhang Y, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease-19. J Med Virol. 2020. Sep;92(9):1533–1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kotani K. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and the oxidative stress burden. Can J Cardiol 2015;31(3):365.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milara J, Martínez-Expósito F, Montero P, et al. N-acetylcysteine reduces inflammasome activation induced by SARS-CoV-2 proteins in vitro. Int J Mol Sci 2022;22;23(23):14518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shi Z, Puyo CA. N-Acetylcysteine to combat COVID-19: An evidence review. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2020;16:1047–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hecke OV, Lee J.. N-acetylcysteine: A rapid review of the evidence for effectiveness in treating COVID-19. The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 2022. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/n-acetylcysteine-a-rapid-review-of-the-evidence-for-effectiveness-in-treating-covid-19/. Accessed: 1 March 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 23.World Health Organization. Clinical management of COVID-19: living guidelin. 2022. [PubMed]
- 24.Dahlan S. Sample Size & sampling method in medicine and health research (Besar sampel dan cara pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian kedokteran dan kesehatan). Jakarta: Selemba Medika. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ferrero-Miliani L, Nielsen OH, Andersen PS, Girardin SE. Chronic inflammation: importance of NOD2 and NALP3 in interleukin-1β generation. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2007. Jan 5;147(2):227–235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Channappanavar R, Fehr AR, Vijay R, et al. Dysregulated type I interferon and inflammatory monocyte-macrophage responses cause lethal pneumonia in SARS-CoV-infected mice. Cell Host Microbe 2016;19(2):181–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arulselvan P, Fard MT, Tan WS, et al. Role of Antioxidants and Natural Products in Inflammation. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016;2016:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kovacic P, Somanathan R.. Inflammation and anti-inflammatory agents – reactive oxygen species and toxicity. In: Laher I, editor. Systems biology of free radicals and antioxidants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014; 3197–2216. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Washington KS, Bashur CA. Delivery of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents for tissue engineered vascular grafts. Front Pharmacol 2017;8:659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Toori KU, Qureshi MA, Chaudhry A, Safdar MF. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in COVID-19: A cheap prognostic marker in a resource constraint setting. Pak J Med Sci 2021;37(5): 1435–1439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.



