Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299669

Variation of sugar compounds in Phoebe chekiangensis seeds during natural desiccation

Huangpan He 1, Handong Gao 1,*, Xiaoming Xue 2, Jiahui Ren 1, Xueqi Chen 1, Ben Niu 1
Editor: Meenakshi Thakur3
PMCID: PMC10919866  PMID: 38452127

Abstract

To investigate the role of sugar metabolism in desiccation-sensitive seeds, we performed a natural desiccation treatment on Phoebe chekiangensis seeds in a room and systematically analyzed the changes in seed germination, sugar compounds, malondialdehyde, and relative electrical conductivity during the seed desiccation. The results revealed that the initial moisture content of P. chekiangensis seed was very high (37.06%) and the seed was sensitive to desiccation, the germination percentage of the seed decreased to 5.33% when the seed was desiccated to 22.04% of moisture content, therefore, the seeds were considered recalcitrant. Based on the logistic model, we know that the moisture content of the seeds is 29.05% when the germination percentage drops to 50% and that it is desirable to keep the seed moisture content above 31.74% during ambient transportation. During seed desiccation, sucrose and trehalose contents exhibited increasing trends, and raffinose also increased during the late stage of desiccation, however, low levels of the non-reducing sugar accumulations may not prevent the loss of seed viability caused by desiccation. Glucose and fructose predominated among sugar compounds, and they showed a slight increase followed by a significant decrease. Their depletion may have contributed to the accumulation of sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between the accumulation of sucrose, trehalose, and soluble sugars, and the reduction in seed viability. Sucrose showed a significant negative correlation with glucose and fructose. Trehalose also exhibited the same pattern of correlation. These results provided additional data and theoretical support for understanding the mechanism of sugar metabolism in seed desiccation sensitivity.

Introduction

Phoebe chekiangensis is a second-class protected tree species in China, a newly discovered endemic and endangered species in Tianmu Mountain of China [1], and its economic value is also high [2]. It provides high-quality wood that can be used for high-grade construction, furniture, carvings, and precision molds [2]. It is also widely used in the production of plywood, lacquer, and wooden tires [2]. P. chekiangensis is distributed in Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangxi, and southern Anhui Provinces in China, and grows mostly in evergreen broad-leaved forests in hilly valleys or red-soil slopes with an altitude of less than 1000 m, and it prefers a warm, moist climate and acidic or slightly acidic soil [3]. There are broad-leaved evergreen forests with P. chekiangensis as the dominant species in Yunqi and Li’an Temple in Hangzhou, while other areas are scattered [2,4]. Currently, the wild resources of P. chekiangensis have been seriously damaged and gradually exhausted due to its poor natural regeneration ability and destructive cutting [5]. P. chekiangensis mainly relies on sowing and seedling raising, and there is a lack of breeding and promotion of excellent strains [6]. Furthermore, the acceleration of global climate change, such as more frequent and prolonged droughts and rising temperatures, is a serious challenge for recalcitrant species that are highly dependent on specific habitats. Therefore, it is crucial to protect the preservation of P. chekiangensis germplasm resources. Assessing the desiccation tolerance of seeds serves as the foundation for germplasm conservation. Our pre-experiment found that P. chekiangensis seeds have higher moisture content (MC) after abscission and are sensitive to desiccation. In addition, there is dormancy in the seeds of P. chekiangensis, and variable temperature stratification can break the dormancy better [7,8]. Studying the desiccation sensitivity of the seeds can provide a theoretical basis and technical support for the long-term preservation of germplasm resources and biodiversity protection.

The majority of seed plants can produce desiccation-tolerant seeds (orthodox seeds), which have a remarkable ability to survive in extreme environmental conditions [9,10]. Orthodox seeds undergo maturation desiccation at a later stage of development, and the moisture content of the seeds is low after abscission and can generally be further dried to less than 5% moisture content without damage [11]. These seeds can be dried to less than 7% MC and stored at -18°C for a long time [12–14]. It is estimated that approximately 8% of seed plants worldwide exhibit seed desiccation sensitivity (recalcitrance), with this percentage increasing to 50% in tropical evergreen rainforests [12,15]. Recalcitrant seeds are highly susceptible to desiccation and freezing, and they quickly lose viability when stored under natural conditions, these seeds remain metabolically active throughout development and even after harvest [16].

Previous studies have indicated that seed acquires desiccation tolerance while accumulating large amounts of soluble sugars during development [17–20]. Among the soluble sugars, sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides (such as raffinose and stachyose) are considered to be involved in the formation of glass or have a protective effect on membrane phospholipids, or both [21]. Oligosaccharides will enhance the protective effect of sucrose by limiting crystallization and facilitating the vitrification of mature seeds [21,22]. Pukacka et al. [23] observed that during late development, desiccation-tolerant Fagus sylvatica L. seeds exhibited an increase in raffinose content and a decrease in the ratio of sucrose to raffinose, and there was a significant increase in the sucrose/(raffinose + stachyose) ratio and α-galactosidase activity in the seeds after 7 and 12 years of storage. Zhu et al. [24] discovered that subjecting the rice seeds to a slow-drying treatment at different developmental stages could induce sucrose accumulation. Trehalose is one of the most effective sugars for maintaining the structural and functional integrity of membranes and proteins at low water concentrations [25]. Coutinho et al. [26] found that among yeasts that naturally produce trehalose, mutant yeast strains with higher trehalose synthase activity had a greater ability to survive under drying and freezing conditions. Similarly, Bellaloui et al. [27] observed a significant increase in the concentration of stachyose, along with a significant decrease in the concentration of glucose, fructose, and sucrose, in Soybean seeds under water stress and high temperatures. Kristina and Sharon [28] found that the sucrose content of cotyledons of Quercus alba was increased in the later stages of drying. The soluble sugar content was increased in recalcitrant seeds of Quercus variabilis [29] during drying.

In addition, Chandra and Keshavkant [30] reported a 1.6-19-fold increase in lipid peroxidation products in dehydrated Madhuca latifolia seeds, and they found an inverse relationship between water content and germination percentage. The drying-induced reduction in seed viability was associated with the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which promote the loss of membrane integrity associated with lipid peroxidation. Liu et al. [31] reported an increase in ROS (O2•- and H2O2) and MDA content in germinating rice seeds under high temperatures and drought stress. Dresch et al. [32] found that drying may disrupt the integrity of the cell membrane system of Campomanesia adamantium seeds, increasing the concentration of exudates leached from the seeds, and leading to an increase in relative electrical conductivity.

To the best of our knowledge, current research on P. chekiangensis seeds has focused on seed dormancy and measures to break dormancy [7,8], as well as seed germination characteristics [33], while research on the response of P. chekiangensis seeds to desiccation has hardly been reported. Therefore, in this study, we systematically investigated the changes in seed germination, sugar compounds, malondialdehyde, and relative electrical conductivity during the natural drying of the seeds in a room, focusing on the role of sucrose, oligosaccharides, and hexoses (glucose and fructose) during seed desiccation, to provide additional data and theoretical support for the sugar metabolism mechanism of desiccation-sensitive seeds.

Materials and methods

Plant material and treatments

The seed maturation period of P.chekiangensis is about from late October to mid-November, and the seed dispersal period is about from late November to mid-December [34,35]. The seeds of P. chekiangensis were collected from three trees in Jiaguan Town, Qionglai City, Sichuan Province, China (31°17′31″N, 103°13′45″E), and the three trees were between 24 and 30 years old. The maturity of the seeds was determined by the change in color of the pericarp from green to blue-black. We picked the mature fruits in plastic bags on November 11, 2021, and brought them back to the laboratory immediately for processing. After returning to the laboratory, the peel was removed to obtain the seeds, and the cracked and broken seeds were removed by water selection. Next, the seed surface was dried in the shade, and the seeds with uniform size were selected for a natural desiccation test. The remaining seeds were stored in wet sand in a 4°C cold storage. The initial moisture content of P. chekiangensis seeds was measured using the low constant temperature oven drying method (103°C for 17 h) [36,37], and the thousand seed weight was measured using the hundred seeds method [38].

For the desiccation experiment, the seeds were spread flat in a circular frame on a shelf in the room for natural drying (temperature range: 15–21°C, relative humidity range: 30–53%). Additionally, six square porcelain plates were placed on the shelf, with each plate evenly spread with approximately 250 g of fresh seeds, and the actual weight of the seeds in these plates was recorded. According to the following Formula (1), the moisture content of the seed lot during desiccation was calculated by the weighing method [39].

Calculation formula of moisture content (MC) [39]:

R=M2−M1×(1−A)M2×100% (1)

where: R is the seed moisture content, %; M1 is the mass of the undried seed, g; M2 is the mass of the dried seed, g; A is the initial moisture content of the undried seed, %.

Samples of the seeds were randomly taken under different drying treatments (37.06%, 33.99%, 30.63%, 28.11%, 25.09%, 22.04%, 19.08%, 16.04%, 13.05%, and 9.66%). Fresh undried (37.06%) seeds were used as the control group. A thermo-hygrometer was placed on the shelf to record the daily temperature and humidity in the room throughout the experiment. During the desiccation process, all experimental seeds were regularly mixed to ensure uniform drying. During each stage of drying (including fresh seeds), four replicates of 100 seeds each were taken for the determination of seed germination, and three replicates of 40 seeds each were taken for the determination of the remaining indicators. The seed drying rate index (k) was calculated by dividing the amount of water loss on a wet basis (%) by the corresponding elapsed time in hours [40].

Determination of seed germination percentage

During each stage of drying (including the control), a total of 400 intact seeds with uniform size were randomly selected and placed on a wet cotton bed. Since the seeds of P. chekiangensis have dormancy [7,8], after drying treatments, all the seeds, including the control, were subjected to variable temperature stratification (15°C 16 h / 25°C 8 h, without light) for 60 days to break dormancy, and germination tests were carried out after dormancy release. The stratified seeds were taken out, washed with water, and then cultured in a constant temperature incubator at 30°C with 24 hours of light. The germination of the seeds was observed and recorded daily. The seed germination standard was that the length of the radicle should be equal to the length of the seed. On the 30th day, the germination tests were finished, and the germination percentage of the seeds was calculated.

Determination of soluble sugar and starch

Sample pre-treatment: we took the seed samples from the -80°C refrigerator, removed the seed coat, and then put every 40 seeds (one repeat) into a low-temperature grinder to grind into powder, and mixed the powder of 40 seeds into a 50ml centrifuge tube and then placed it in liquid nitrogen for temporary preservation. After all the samples were treated in this way, the 27 (9 treatments, 3 replicates per treatment) centrifuge tubes filled with powder were placed in a refrigerator at -80°C for testing.

The soluble sugar and starch were determined by the Anthrone colorimetric method referring to the experimental methods of Zhang [41] and Gao [42]. For each replicate, 0.5 g of seeds were weighed into 10 mL centrifuge tubes. Soluble sugars were extracted using 80% ethanol, while the remaining residue was used to extract starch with 9.2mol·L-1 HClO4 and 4.6mol·L-1 HClO4. 2 mL of soluble sugar extract was absorbed into a centrifuge tube, evaporated in a boiling water bath, then 10 mL of distilled water was added, and dissolved with sufficient stirring. The supernatant was obtained by centrifugation at 4000 r·min-1 for 10 min. 2 mL of the supernatant was absorbed into the test tube and mixed with 5 mL of anthrone-sulfuric acid reagent in an ice-water bath. The reaction solution was mixed and then placed in a water bath at 100°C for 10 min. After cooling to room temperature, the absorbance (OD) values of the reaction solution at 620 nm were read by a Beckman DU 800 UV-visible spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA; the same hereafter). A standard curve was created using a glucose standard solution to calculate the soluble sugar content. Additionally, the starch extract was diluted 10 times, and the remaining steps were consistent with the determination of soluble sugar.

Determination of sugar components

The determination of sugar components (including arabinose, fructose, galactose, glucose, inositol, sucrose, trehalose, raffinose, and stachyose) was carried out by referring to the experimental method of Najah M. Al-Mhanna [43], and the qualitative identification and quantitative analysis of each compound were performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS).

Extraction of the sample: Sample pre-treatment as above. 0.2 g of the sample was accurately weighed into a centrifuge tube, and 1 mL of petroleum ether was added. The resulting mixture was then centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded to obtain the residue. Then 3 mL of 80% methanol was added into the residue for extraction, and this extraction process was repeated three times, resulting in a total of 9 mL of the extracted solution.

Derivatization: 1 mL of sample extracted solution was absorbed into a centrifuge tube, and 1.5 mL of 20 mg·mL-1 methoxy aminopyridine hydrochloride solution was added, shaken at 650 r·min-1 for 1.5 hours at 37°C. Then 2.5 mL of N, O-bis (trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane) was added, and the mixture was shaken at 650 r·min-1 for 1 hour at 70°C. Next, the mixture was taken out and left at room temperature for 30 minutes, centrifuged to obtain the supernatant, and then the supernatant was determined using the machine. Additionally, 1 mL of the standard solution was taken, and the same derivatization steps were followed as mentioned above.

GCMS operating conditions: the instrument was a gas chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer, model TSQ 9000 AEI (GCMSMS). HP-5 chromatographic column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm), injection volume was 1 μL, gasification chamber temperature was 280°C, split ratio was 100:1, carrier gas was helium (99.999%), and flow rate was 1 mL·min-1. The initial temperature of the chromatographic column was 80°C for 1 min, and the temperature was increased to 240°C at a rate of 6°C·min-1 for 15 min.

Determination of relative electrical conductivity

The relative electrical conductivity of the seeds was determined with some modifications according to the method of Matthews et al. [44]. All seed samples were used as experimental determinations. The seeds were rinsed 3 times with deionized water, and the surface of the seeds was blotted with absorbent paper. Each tube was filled with 15 seeds, 25 mL of deionized water was added, and mixed well, and the initial conductivity (R0) of the mixture was measured using a conductivity meter (INESA, DDS, type 307). The sample mixture was then left at a constant temperature of 25°C for 24 hours to allow sufficient swelling, and the conductivity (R1) of the seed leachate was determined. Subsequently, the test tube with the leachate was sealed with a preservative film and placed in a boiling water bath for 40 minutes. After cooling to room temperature and shaking the leachate several times, the conductivity (R2) of the boiling seed leaching solution was measured. The relative electrical conductivity of the seeds, R (%), was calculated according to the following equation.

R(%)=R1−R0R2−R0×100

where: R0 is the initial leachate conductivity of the seeds (μs·cm-1), R1 is the leachate conductivity of the seeds at 25°C (μs·cm-1) and R2 is the leachate conductivity of the seeds after the boiling water bath (μs·cm-1).

Determination of malondialdehyde

The malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined with some modifications according to the method of Chen et al. [45]. Sample pre-treatment as above. 0.5 g of seed sample was weighed into a mortar, and 8 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added for grinding, and then the homogenate obtained was centrifuged at 3000 r·min-1 for 10 minutes. Next, 2 mL of the supernatant was transferred to a test tube and mixed with 2 mL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid (TBA). The mixture was then boiled in a water bath at 100°C for 30 minutes. After cooling, the mixture was centrifuged again, and the resulting supernatant was used as the test solution. The absorbance (OD) values of the test solutions were measured at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm using the spectrophotometer.

Statistical analysis

The normal distribution diagram and Shapiro-Wilk test were used to assess the normality of all data, while the Levene test was used to assess the homogeneity of variance. For data that did not meet normality or homogeneity of variance, a natural logarithm conversion was performed.

The relationship between seed drying time and moisture content was assessed using a quadratic function, while the relationship between moisture content and germination percentage was assessed using a Logistic regression model. One-way ANOVA was employed to determine the effects of different drying treatments on germination percentage, germination index, sugar compounds, relative electrical conductivity, and MDA. Duncan’s multiple comparisons were conducted to identify significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis was performed on the physiological and biochemical indexes, and the relationship between germination percentage and sugar compounds was further analyzed using linear regression analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on experimental data. Statistical analysis and visualization of all data were conducted using SPSS 22 and Origin 21.

Results

Changes in moisture content and seed germination during desiccation

The initial moisture content of P.chekiangensis seeds was 37.06%, and the thousand seed weight was 286.52 g. The moisture content of P. chekiangensis seeds decreased with increasing drying time (Fig 1A). The seed drying rate was observed to be non-uniform under room temperature conditions, with a rate of 0.107%/h at the early stage of desiccation (k1, between 0–84 h), 0.078%/h at the middle stage of desiccation (k2, between 84–162 h), and 0.042%/h at the late stage of desiccation (k3, between 162–455 h). This indicates that the drying rate exhibited a trend of initially being fast and then slowing down. As the moisture content decreased, the seed germination percentage decreased (Fig 1C). At the initial moisture content (37.06%), the seed germination percentage was 91.17% and did not change significantly when dried to 33.99% MC. However, when dried to 30.63% MC, the germination percentage decreased to 72.33%, indicating the seed viability began to decline significantly. The germination percentage further decreased to 36.50% when the seeds were dried to 28.11% MC, at which point most of the seeds had died. Subsequently, when the seeds were dried to 13.05% and 9.66% MC, all the seeds were dead. The change trends of the seed germination index (Fig 1D) and germination percentage were consistent. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between seed moisture content and germination percentage (Fig 1B), and the R2 and p-value indicated that the regression equation was a strong and statistically significant fit. According to this equation, the moisture content of P. chekiangensis seeds is 29.05% when the germination percentage drops to 50%. To ensure the high viability of the seed lot during short-term storage or transportation at room temperature, the moisture content should be maintained at 31.74% or higher. Below a moisture content of 13.55% MC, the seeds lose all germination power. Therefore, a moisture content range of 37.06–13.05% was used for the subsequent data analysis in this study.

Fig 1. Changes in moisture content and germination of Phoebe chekiangensis seeds during desiccation.

Fig 1

The quadratic function regression model was used for the relationship between drying time and moisture content (A), Logistic regression model was used for the relationship between moisture content and germination percentage (B). The influence of desiccation on germination percentage (C) and germination index (D) was analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 level according to the Duncan test. Data represent mean ± SE.

Changes in sugar compounds during seed desiccation

The starch content increased and then decreased during drying, and it increased by 108.8% when dried to 30.63% MC (Fig 2A and S1 Table). However, when the seeds were dried to 25.09%, the starch content decreased by 34.76%. On the other hand, the soluble sugar content exhibited a consistent increasing trend (Fig 2B and S1 Table). The soluble sugar content increased by 22% when dried to 30.63% MC and by 76% when dried to 13.05%.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Effects of different moisture contents on starch (A), soluble sugar (B), and sugar components (C and D) during seed desiccation. Data represent mean ± SE.

Sucrose content significantly increased (p < 0.05) under drying treatment (Fig 2C and S1 Table). The sucrose content increased nearly six-fold when the seeds dried to 33.99% MC, while it increased about 447-fold at the late stage of drying (13.05% MC). Similarly, the trehalose content exhibited a fluctuating increase during drying. The trehalose content started to significantly increase at 30.63% of MC and continued to rise as drying progressed. Ultimately, the trehalose content increased about 23-fold when the seeds dried to 13.05% MC. During desiccation, there was a noticeable pattern in the inositol content. Inositol content was increased by 13.67% when the seeds were dried to 30.63% MC. However, as the seeds were further dried to 22.04% and 13.05% MC, the inositol content decreased by 34.65% and 28.17%, respectively. The glucose content showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing during seed desiccation (Fig 2D and S1 Table). Notably, the increase in glucose content was not significant when the seeds were dried to the range of 30.63% to 19.08% moisture content. However, a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in glucose content was observed when the seeds were dried to 16.04%. The trend of fructose during seed desiccation likely followed a similar pattern to that of glucose. The galactose content exhibited a fluctuating increasing trend as the moisture content decreased. When the seeds were dried to 25.09% MC, galactose content increased by 28.75%, while when the seeds were dried to 19.08% MC, galactose content increased by 58.72%. On the other hand, the arabinose content showed an increase followed by a decrease during drying. The arabinose content significantly increased (p < 0.05) when the seeds were dried to 25.09% MC, while no significant change was observed under other drying treatments.

We found that the specific non-reducing sugar content (the sum of sucrose, trehalose, and inositol content) increased during drying, with an approximately 82-fold increase in the non-reducing sugar content at 13.05% MC (Fig 3A). In contrast, the ratio of (glucose + fructose + arabinose + galactose) to (sucrose + trehalose + inositol) (RS/NRS) was decreased during drying, with the ratio decreasing by almost 1-fold at 13.05% MC (Fig 3C). Among the three non-reducing sugars (sucrose, trehalose, and inositol), sucrose was the most abundant, while glucose and fructose dominated among the four reducing sugars (Fig 3A and 3B).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Effects of different moisture contents on (A) non-reducing sugar (NRS), (B) reducing sugar (RS), and (C) reducing sugar/non-reducing sugar (RS/NRS) during seed desiccation. The non-reducing sugar content refers to the combined amount of sucrose, trehalose, and inositol, whereas the reducing sugar content refers to the combined amount of fructose, glucose, galactose, and arabinose. RS/NRS refers to the ratio of (glucose + fructose + arabinose + galactose) to (sucrose + trehalose + inositol). One-way ANOVA analysis was performed on the data. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 level according to the Duncan test. Data represent mean ± SE.

Changes in relative electrical conductivity and MDA during desiccation

As the seed moisture content decreased, the relative electrical conductivity (RC) tended to increase (Fig 4A), while the malondialdehyde (MDA) content showed a fluctuating upward trend (Fig 4B). Notably, both RC and MDA contents increased significantly (p < 0.05) when the seeds were dried to 28.11% MC, indicating that at this stage the seeds began to suffer damage. The seed germination percentage also significantly decreased to 36.50% at this time. Furthermore, when the seeds were dried to 13.05% MC, the relative electrical conductivity and MDA increased by 296.58% and 79.69%, respectively.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Effects of desiccation on relative electrical conductivity (A) and MDA (B). One-way ANOVA analysis was performed on the data. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 level according to the Duncan test. Data represent mean ± SE.

Correlation and principal component analysis

During seed desiccation, the germination percentage showed a significant positive correlation (p < 0.05) with the germination index, starch, fructose, and RS/NRS (Fig 5). On the other hand, it was negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with soluble sugars, galactose, sucrose, trehalose, relative electrical conductivity (RC), and MDA. Soluble sugars exhibited a significant positive correlation with galactose, sucrose, and trehalose (p < 0.05), but a negative correlation with fructose, inositol, and RS/NRS (p < 0.05). Furthermore, fructose showed a significant positive correlation with glucose (r = 0.95, p < 0.05). Sucrose exhibited significant negative correlations with both fructose and glucose, with correlation coefficients of -0.58 and -0.50, respectively (p < 0.05). Additionally, sucrose showed a significant positive correlation with trehalose, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 (p < 0.05). Glucose was positively and significantly correlated with inositol (p < 0.05), but negatively correlated with sucrose and trehalose (p < 0.05). Fructose showed a significant positive correlation with arabinose and inositol (p < 0.05), and a significant negative correlation with trehalose (p < 0.05). Trehalose was found to have a significant negative correlation with starch, fructose, and inositol (p < 0.05). RC exhibited a significant positive correlation with soluble sugars, galactose, sucrose, and trehalose (p < 0.05), and a negative correlation with starch, fructose, glucose, inositol, and RS/NRS (p < 0.05). Additionally, RC showed a significant positive correlation with MDA (r = 0.69, p < 0.05). We continued to explore the relationship between germination percentage and sugar compounds by linear regression analysis (S1 Fig). It was observed that the germination percentage was better fitted with soluble sugar, sucrose, and trehalose with R2 of 0.891, 0.741, and 0.758, respectively. All the fitted equations mentioned above were found to be significant.

Fig 5. Correlation analysis between physiological and biochemical indexes during seed desiccation.

Fig 5

The size of the circles in the diagram represents the level of correlation (r), with bigger circles indicating a higher correlation. “*” indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. MC: Moisture content, GP: Germination percentage, GI: Germination index, ST: Starch, SS: Soluble sugar, NRS: The combined amount of sucrose, trehalose, and inositol, RS: The combined amount of fructose, glucose, galactose, and arabinose, RS/NRS: The ratio of the two above, RC: Relative electrical conductivity, MDA: Malondialdehyde.

The results of the principal component analysis revealed that the germination percentage had a major impact on principal component 1 (Prin1), followed by RS/NRS, germination index, and trehalose, which showed high loadings of these variables in Prin1 (Fig 6). Starch and galactose had a major impact on principal component 2 (Prin2), as evidenced by the high loadings of the two variables in Prin2. The first two principal components accounted for 71.3% and 11.1% of the observed variance, respectively (totaling 82.40%).

Fig 6. Principal component analysis between physiological and biochemical indexes during seed desiccation.

Fig 6

GP: Germination percentage, GI: Germination index, ST: Starch, SS: Soluble sugar, NRS: The combined amount of sucrose, trehalose, and inositol, RS: The combined amount of fructose, glucose, galactose, and arabinose, RS/NRS: The ratio of the two above, RC: Relative electrical conductivity, MDA: Malondialdehyde.

Discussion

Desiccation sensitivity of P. chekiangensis seeds

The moisture content of recalcitrant seeds is high before and after harvest, accompanied by a state of high metabolism. The moisture content of the seeds of P. chekiangensis was also higher (37.06%) when they were matured and shed, and the seeds are sensitive to desiccation, seed germination percentage decreased to 5.33% when the moisture content decreased to 22.04% (Fig 1C), therefore, the seeds of P. chekiangensis are recalcitrant. The seeds drying rate at room temperature was uniform, which was consistent with the results of Vieira et al. [40] and Karin et al. [46]. In addition, differences in sensitivity to desiccation were observed among different species. Tchokponhoué et al. [47] found that the seeds of S. dulcificum had an initial moisture content of 36.6% (99% of viability). However, when the seeds were dried to 20%, more than half of their viability was lost, and when dried to 9.5%, all the seeds died. Varghese et al. [48] discovered that mahua (Madhuca indica J.F. Gruel.) seeds had a high initial MC (53%) with 100% of seed viability. However, after being dried for 29 days, reaching a moisture content below 16.8%, the seed germination percentage decreased by almost 90%.

Response of sugars as the protective substance to seed desiccation

Previous studies have shown a correlation between sugar accumulation and seed desiccation tolerance [49–52]. Mechanisms to protect against desiccation damage may exist in both the vegetative organs and seeds of desiccation-tolerant plants, such as the accumulation of sucrose and raffinose family oligosaccharides (raffinose and stachyose), which help stabilize membranes, proteins, and the cytoplasmic glass matrix [53]. How do the sugars of recalcitrant seeds respond to desiccation? During desiccation, the contents of sucrose, trehalose, and soluble sugar in P. chekiangensis seeds increased significantly, and the starch content decreased. This is consistent with the findings of desiccation-sensitive Inga vera seeds [54]. Hydrolysis of starch may contribute to the increase in sugars. Moreover, the increase in soluble sugars observed in the seeds of P. chekiangensis may also be a result of reduced seed respiration rate, which reduces sugar consumption. Correlation analysis revealed that the accumulation of sucrose and trehalose was associated with reduced seed viability, indicating that the accumulation of the sugars acts as a protective substance in the seed, but low levels of sugar accumulation still do not prevent the loss of seed viability. Notably, it has also been argued that the impact of sugar on seed desiccation tolerance is not isolated but rather connected to both the developmental stage of the seed and the synergistic effects of abscisic acid and proteins [18].

The supply of hexoses (glucose and fructose) during desiccation is an important step in the regulation of sugar biosynthesis [55]. In our desiccation experiments, we observed that fructose and glucose predominated among soluble carbohydrates, and they showed a slight increase in the middle of desiccation but significantly decreased towards the late desiccation stage, which is in general agreement with the results of Ghasempour et al. [56] and Whittaker et al. [55]. We speculate that the slight increase in glucose and fructose in the middle of desiccation may be attributed to a higher rate of starch decomposition compared to sucrose synthesis at this stage. In addition, the transient accumulation of these sugars in the middle of desiccation contributes to osmoregulation [56]. We also found that the raffinose content of P. chekiangensis seeds increased during the later stages of desiccation (S1 Table), in contrast to the results for desiccation-sensitive Inga vera seeds [54]. The accumulation of high levels of hexoses and low levels of sucrose and oligosaccharides may be a characteristic of some desiccation-sensitive seeds.

Response of MDA and relative electrical conductivity to desiccation

When plants were exposed to environmental stress, cell membranes were the first to be damaged, resulting in membrane lipid peroxidation, spillage of intracellular lysis products, and accumulation of malondialdehyde [57]. The content of MDA can indicate the extent of cell membrane peroxidation and cell damage [58]. During desiccation, the MDA content of P. chekiangensis seeds showed a fluctuating upward trend. A significant increase in MDA content was observed when the seeds were dried to 28.11% MC. This indicates that the seeds have experienced severe oxidative damage, resulting in a loss of more than half of their viability. Furthermore, we observed a correlation between MDA accumulation and reduction in seed viability. Previous studies have also confirmed that the decline in the viability of recalcitrant seeds is closely related to the accumulation of membrane lipid peroxides, such as Camellia sinensis [59], Quercus robur [60], Trichilia connaroides [61] and Ginkgo biloba [39]. Under abiotic stress conditions, loss of seed viability is linked to the disruption of cell membrane structure and integrity, leading to an increase in relative electrical conductivity [39]. We found that the relative electrical conductivity of P. chekiangensis seeds kept increasing during desiccation. A similar trend was also observed during the drying of Campomanesia adamantium seeds [32]. In conclusion, both MDA and relative electrical conductivity can better characterize the damage to the membrane system induced by seed desiccation.

Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the effects of different drying treatments on seed germination, sugar compounds, MDA, and relative electrical conductivity in P. chekiangensis seeds. The initial moisture content of the seeds was high (37.06%) and the seeds were sensitive to desiccation, for example, when the seeds were dried to 22.04% MC, they lost 94% of their viability, therefore, the seeds of P. chekiangensis were considered to be recalcitrant. According to the logistic model, we know that when seed germination drops to 50%, the moisture content is 29.05%, and the MC should ideally be kept above 31.74% when the seed lot is transported at room temperature. The contents of sucrose and trehalose tended to increase during seed desiccation. Correlation analyses showed that the reduction in seed viability was significantly correlated with the accumulation of sucrose, trehalose, and soluble sugars, suggesting that the sugar acts as a protective substance against desiccation, but low levels of the sugar accumulation were still unable to inhibit the loss of seed viability induced by desiccation. We observed that among the sugar compounds, glucose and fructose were predominant, with a slight increase in their content in mid-desiccation and a significant decrease in late desiccation. The accumulation of glucose and fructose in the middle stage of desiccation is beneficial for osmoregulation. Both MDA and relative electrical conductivity showed an increasing trend during seed desiccation, indicating potential damage to the membrane system induced by seed drying.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Changes of soluble carbohydrates in seeds of Phoebe chekiangensis during desiccation.

One-way ANOVA analysis was used for the data. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 level according to the Duncan test. Data represent mean ± SE. “-” means the data is not detected.

(DOCX)

pone.0299669.s001.docx (18.1KB, docx)
S1 Fig. Linear regression analysis between germination percentage and some sugar compounds.

The regression line is represented by the black line. GP: Germination percentage, SS: Soluble sugar.

(DOCX)

pone.0299669.s002.docx (216.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mingzhu Wang, Wen Gu, Yuan Zheng, and Hao Li for their help in handling the experimental materials.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX22_1110) (Huangpan He), which funded the cost of sampling and testing of samples.The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Shang C-B. A New Species of the Phoebe from Chekiang. Acta Phytotaxon. Sin. 1974; 12(3):295–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li D-L, Jin Y-Q, Shang C-B. Study on cultivation and utilization of rare tree spe- cies Phoebe chekiangensis. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology. 2004; 31(1):23–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wu C-P, Zou H-L, Yuan W-G, Huang Y-J, Zhang J, Shen A-H. Investigation and Analysis on the Habitat of Phoebe chekiangensis. JOUR. OF ZHEJIANG FOR. SCI. & TECH. 2013; 33(2):1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xu S-S. Study on population ecology and introduction cultivation of Phoebe chekiangensis. Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhu H, Xu Z, Wang H, Li B. Tropical rain forest fragmentation and its ecological and species diversity changes in southern Yunnan. Biodiversity & Conservation. 2004; 13:1355–1372. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhou S-C. Investigation and progeny seedling test of plus-tree of Phoebe bournei, Phoebe zhennan and Phoebe chekiangensis. Thesis, Zhejiang A & F University. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shi X-H, Shi Z-L. Preliminary study on dormancy physiology of Phoebe chekiangensis seeds. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College. 1990; 7(4):85–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shi X-H, Shi Z-L. Study on Seed and Dormancy of Phoebe chekiangensis and Its Releasing Ways. Seed. 1990; (3):76. 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.1990.03.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sano N, Rajjou L, North HM, Debeaujon I, Marion-Poll A, Seo M. Staying Alive: Molecular Aspects of Seed Longevity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57(4):660–674. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv186 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stavrinides AK, Dussert S, Combes M-C, Fock-Bastide I, Severac D, Minier J, et al. Seed comparative genomics in three coffee species identify desiccation tolerance mechanisms in intermediate seeds. J Exp Bot. 2020; 71(4):1418–1433. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz508 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Song S-Q, Liu J, Tang C-F, Cheng H-Y, Wang W-Q, Zhang Q, et al. Research Pr- ogress on the Physiology and Its Molecular Mechanism of Seed Desiccation Tolerance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2022; 55(06):1047–1063. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Baskin CC, Baskin JM. Ecological aspects of seed desic- cation sensitivity. J Ecol. 2003; 91(2):294–304. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00760.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kijak H, Ratajczak E. What Do We Know About the Genetic Basis of Seed Desi- ccation Tolerance and Longevity? Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(10):3612. doi: 10.3390/ijms21103612 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jaganathan GK, Li J, Yang Y, Han Y, Liu B. Complexities in identifying seed sto- rage behavior of hard seed-coated species: a special focus on Lauraceae. Botany Letters. 2019; 166(1):70–79. 10.1080/23818107.2018.1563566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Marques A, Nijveen H, Somi C, Ligterink W, Hilhorst H. Induction of desiccation tolerance in desiccation sensitive Citrus limon seeds. J Integr Plant Biol. 2019; 61(5):624–638. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12788 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sershen Perumal A, Varghese B, Govender P, Ramdhani S, Berjak P. Effects of elevated temperatures on germination and subsequent seedling vigour in recalcitr- ant Trichilia emetica seeds. S Afr J Bot. 2014; 90:153–162. 10.1016/j.sajb.2013.11.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leprince O, Hendry GAF, McKersie BD. The mechanisms of desiccation toleran- ce in developing seeds. Seed Sci Res. 2008; 3(4):231–246. 10.1017/s0960258500001859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang Q-H, Song S-Q, Ye W-H, Yin S-H. Relationship between desiccation-tolerance and sugars in seeds. Bulletin of Botanical Research. 2003; 23(2):204–210. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koster KL, Leopold AC. Sugars and desiccation tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiol. 1988; 88(3):829–832. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.3.829 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuo TM, VanMiddlesworth JF, Wolf WJ. Content of raffinose oligosaccharides and sucrose in various plant seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1988; 36(1):32–36. 10.1021/jf00079a008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buitink J, Leprince O. Intracellular glasses and seed survival in the dry state. C R Biol. 2008; 331(10):788–795. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.08.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Walters C., Orthodoxy recalcitrance and in-between: describing variation in seed storage characteristics using threshold responses to water loss. Planta. 2015; 242(2):397–406. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2312-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pukacka S, Ratajczak E, Kalemba E. Non-reducing sugar levels in beech (Fagus sylvatica) seeds as related to withstanding desiccation and storage. J Plant Physiol. 2009; 166(13):1381–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.02.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu C, Cheng C, Liu X, He JY. Accumulation of soluble sugars related to desiccation tolerance during rice (Oryza sativa L) seed development and maturation. Seed Sci Technol. 2007; 35(3):649–659(611). 10.15258/sst.2007.35.3.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Curry MR, Watson PF, Carpenter JF, Wistrom CA. Stabilization of dry phospholi- pid bilayers and proteins by sugars. Biochemistry. 1987; 242:1–10. doi: 10.1042/bj2420001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coutinho C, Bernardes E, Félix D, Panek AD. Trehalose as cryoprotectant for preservation of yeast strains. J Biotechnol. 1988; 7(1):23–32. 10.1016/0168-1656(88)90032-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bellaloui N, Mengistu A, Kassem MA. Effects of Genetics and Environment on Fatty Acid Stability in Soybean Seed. Food & Nutrition Sciences. 2013; 4(9A):165–175. 10.4236/fns.2013.49A1024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kristina C, Sharon S. Biochemistry of Recalcitrant Seeds: Carbohydrates, Lipids, and Proteins. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition). 2005; 29(1):5–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li D-X. Analysis of desiccation sensitivity of Quercus variabilis seeds. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Forestry. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chandra J, Keshavkant S. Desiccation-induced ROS accumulation and lipid cata- bolism in recalcitrant Madhuca latifolia seeds. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018; 24(1):75–87. doi: 10.1007/s12298-017-0487-y . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu J, Hasanuzzaman M, Wen H, Zhang J, Peng T, Sun H, et al. High temperature and drought stress cause abscisic acid and reactive oxygen species accumulation and suppress seed germination growth in rice. Protoplasma. 2019; 256(5):1217–1227. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01354-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dresch DM, Masetto TE, Scalon SPQ. Campomanesia adamantium (Cambess.) O. Berg seed desiccation: influence on vigor and nucleic acids. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2015; 87(4):2217–2228. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201520140539 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Z, Wang S-J, Liu C-L, Lin X-Z. Study on seed germination characteristics of Phoebe sheareri and Phoebe chekiangensis. Northern Horticulture. 2012; (7):58–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.State-owned Forest Farm and Forest Seedling Work Station of State Forestry Administration, editor. Seeds of Woody Plants in China. 1st ed. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishing House; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shen G-F, editor. Silviculturetechnic for the Principal Treespecies of China. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishing House; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). In: International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), editor. International Rules for Seed Testing. Chapter 9: Determination of Moisture Content. Basserdorf: Switzerland; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen H, Shen Y. Investigation of Water Distribution and Mobility Dynamics in Recalcitrant Quercus acutissima Seeds during Desiccation Using Magnetic Resonance Methods. Forests. 2023; 14(4):738. 10.3390/f14040738. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. Forest tree seed inspection procedures, GB 2772–1999. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Feng J, Shen Y, Shi F, Li C. Changes in seed germination ability, lipid peroxidati- on and antioxidant enzyme activities of Ginkgo biloba seed during desiccation. Forests. 2017; 8(8):286. 10.3390/f8080286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vieira PH, Lando AP, Goeten D, Junior RO, Viana WG, Steiner N. Physiological behavior trend of Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Myrtaceae) seeds under desicca- tion and their implication for germplasm conservation. Trees. 2022; 36(1):53–66. 10.1007/s00468-021-02178-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang Z, Wang X, Luo Y, Yu F. Carbon competition between fatty acids and star- ch during benzoin seeds maturation slows oil accumulation speed. Trees. 2017; 31(3):1025–1039. 10.1007/s00468-017-1528-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gao J-F, editor. Experimental guide to plant physiology. 1st ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Najah A-M, Huebner H, Buchholz R. Analysis of the sugar content in food pro- ducts by using gas chromatography mass spectrometry and enzymatic methods. Foods. 2018; 7(11):185. doi: 10.3390/foods7110185 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Matthews S, Demir I, Celikkol T, Kenanoglu BB, Mavi K. Vigour tests for cabbage seeds using electrical conductivity and controlled deterioration to estimate relative emergence in transplant modules. Seed Sci Technol. 2009; 37(3):736–746. 10.15258/sst.2009.37.3.20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen C, Chen H, Ni M, Yu F. A Study on Petal Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Styrax japonicus during the Flowering Period. Agronomy. 2021; 11(8):1498. 10.3390/agronomy11081498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van der Walt K, Burritt DJ, Nadarajan J. Impacts of Rapid Desiccation on Oxida- tive Status, Ultrastructure and Physiological Functions of Syzygium maire (Myrtaceae) Zygotic Embryos in Preparation for Cryopreservation. Plants. 2022; 11(8):1056. doi: 10.3390/plants11081056 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tchokponhoue DA, N’Danikou S, Achigan-Dako EG. A combination of approa- ches evidenced seed storage behaviour in the miracle berry Synsepalum dulcificum (Schumach. et Thonn.) Daniell. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1714-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Varghese B, Naithani R, Dulloo ME, Naithani SC. Seed storage behaviour in Madhuca indica JF Gmel. Seed Sci Technol. 2002; 30(1):107–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pammenter N, Berjak P. A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccation-tolerance mechanisms. Seed Sci Res. 1999; 9(1):13–37. 10.1017/S0960258599000033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2001; 6(9):431–438. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02052-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang Q, Song X, Bartels D. Enzymes and metabolites in carbohydrate metaboli- sm of desiccation tolerant plants. Proteomes. 2016; 4(4):40. doi: 10.3390/proteomes4040040 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Salvi P, Varshney V, Majee M. Raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs): role in seed vigor and longevity. Biosci Rep. 2022; 42(10):BSR20220198. doi: 10.1042/BSR20220198 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Tetteroo FA, Wolkers WF. Induction of desiccation tolerance in plant somatic embryos: how exclusive is the protective role of sugars? Cryobiology. 2001; 43(2):140–150. doi: 10.1006/cryo.2001.2358 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mello JIO, Centeno DC, Barbedo CJ, Figueiredo-Ribeiro RCL. Changes in carb- ohydrate composition in seeds of three tropical tree species submitted to drying and storage at freezing temperature. Seed Sci Technol. 2011; 39(2):465–480. 10.15258/sst.2011.39.2.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Whittaker A, Bochicchio A, Vazzana C, Lindsey G, Farrant J. Changes in leaf hexokinase activity and metabolite levels in response to drying in the desiccation‐tolerant species Sporobolus stapfianus and Xerophyta viscosa. J Exp Bot. 2001; 52(358):961–969. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.358.961 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ghasempour H, Gaff D, Williams R, Gianello R. Contents of sugars in leaves of drying desiccation tolerant flowering plants, particularly grasses. Plant Growth Regul. 1998; 24:185–191. 10.1023/A:1005927629018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shafiq S, Akram NA, Ashraf M, Al-Harbi MS, Samra BN. Sugar beet extract rich in glycine betaine modulates oxidative defense system and key physiological characteristics of maize under water-deficit stress. PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0254906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254906 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Turkan I, Bor M, Ozdemir F, Koca H. Differential responses of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in the leaves of drought-tolerant P. acutifolius Gray and drought-sensitive P. vulgaris L. subjected to polyethylene glycol mediated water stress. Plant Sci. 2005; 168(1):223–231. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.07.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen Q, Yang L, Ahmad P, Wan X, Hu X. Proteomic profiling and redox status alteration of recalcitrant tea (Camellia sinensis) seed in response to desiccation. Planta. 2011; 233(3):583–592. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1322-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ntuli TM, Finch-Savage WE, Berjak P, Pammenter NW. Increased Drying Rate Lowers the Critical Water Content for Survival in Embryonic Axes of English Oak (Quercus robur L.) Seeds. J Integr Plant Biol. 2011; 53(4):270–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01016.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Song SQ, Berjak P, Pammenter N. Desiccation sensitivity of Trichilia dregeana axes and antioxidant role of ascorbic acid. Acta Bot Sin. 2004; 46(7):803–810. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Meenakshi Thakur

20 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-28564Variation of soluble carbohydrates in Phoebe chekiangensis seeds during natural desiccationPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Variation of soluble carbohydrates in Phoebe chekiangensis seeds during natural desiccation

The research is interesting. However, some points are there which must be cleared as mentioned by the reviewers. Discussion part needs refinements. Conclusions should be more precise, meaningful and should be based on data obtained. The overall English grammar of the manuscript needs to be improved. The manuscript can be accepted after these changes and those suggested by the reviewers.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 04 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Meenakshi Thakur, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Please include your figures as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files".

4. We are unable to open your Supporting Information file [Figs1-7.tif.7z]. Please kindly revise as necessary and re-upload.

Additional Editor Comments:

Variation of soluble carbohydrates in Phoebe chekiangensis seeds during natural desiccation

The research is interesting. However, some points are there which must be cleared as mentioned by the reviewers. Discussion part needs refinements. Conclusions should be more precise, meaningful and should be based on data obtained. The overall English grammar of the manuscript needs to be improved. The manuscript can be accepted after these changes and those suggested by the reviewers.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I have to admit that I recently contacted one of the author’s departments for some collaboration and/or other possibilities; although it did not materialize, I have known one of the authors of this study. However, this does not exert a conflict of interest in reviewing this paper. I have reviewed this as I would review other papers.

I have an exceptional interest in Lauraceae, and several new species discovered in the 21st-century display that many species of this family can produce desiccation-sensitive seeds. A review article previously described understanding desiccation-sensitivity in Lauraceae is complex and requires careful consideration (Jaganathan et al., 2019). In this sense, this manuscript is fascinating. However, the manuscript needs a lot of improvement. Please see below where I cannot ascertain what the authors were trying to say.

The title can be improved. ‘Variation of soluble carbohydrates’ looks a little vague. Perhaps something to reflect the overall results would be good.

The writing can be a lot tighter. For example, the first two sentences of the introduction can be combined, and statements like these need reference.

Introduction

Can the authors think about giving a range of occurrences for this species?

L43- it is unclear what you mean by breeding technology.

L48- rising temperatures and more prolonged droughts are weather anomalies;- therefore, it is unclear what you mean here.

L49- didn’t you say this a few lines before?

L51- the high moisture content was observed in this study or previous studies. If the former, you should better put them in results.

L 52- You have a tendency to repeat the same information using different words. Please combine all these and write concisely.

L 58- order can be improved. First, talk about desiccation during development, then abscission.

L 60- I think storing at -10C is rare; the seeds are usually stored at -18C.

L67- 10% is too low; most recalcitrant seeds die above 10% MC.

L68- you say previous studies but cited only one reference.

L 69- I think you tend to say important and they are, why not delete ‘are important, and they’

L73- how?

L75- what do you mean by acquire?

L77- 106: The paragraph appears too long. I think you could condense the information. Similarly, these are for orthodox seeds. Is there any evidence showing soluble sugar accumulation is different in recalcitrant seeds? If so, you would have to discuss that.

L107- Perhaps you need to specifically state the objectives of the study here. It looks like you have only investigated the soluble carbohydrates in this study.

Materials and methods

L121- the collection time (maturity time) indicates the seeds are naturally dispersed before winter. Last year, when I visited Jiangsu, it was early December, and winter had begun already. It would be good to include more details about dispersal.

L126- for how long?

L 126- MC results move to results. However, what do you mean by the low-constant oven drying method? Please specify the temperature and time.

L 128- seed weight results to the results section. What is the 100 seeds method? Please include a reference; if not, describe how this was done.

L133- following formula? I don’t see any formula following, but if you mean the equation given on L149- use the number and refer accordingly.

L 136- I don’t think these were target moisture contents. I would assume you dried the seeds and periodically removed them; if so, why not give time instead of moisture content? I also think ‘portion’ is not a good usage in science. Two seeds can be a portion, and all the seeds except two can also be a portion.

L138-148: the order or the information should be tweaked for clarity.

L 155- did any studies show these seeds have dormancy, or is it your assumption? If this is your unpublished result, you should probably include this in the introduction.

L 156-160- a lot going on. Did you use 15/25C for the dormancy break? Why did you choose this temperature range? It is also unclear why 24-hour light was chosen for germination.

For sections 2.3 and 2.4, you mentioned the methodology but did not give any details about the materials. It is seeds, but what treatments were done to them is not given. This information is crucial.

L 217- Control seeds?

L 233- what is MDA?

L 246- so you did both square root and log transformation? Whilst which transformation is better could be a subject of unresolved debate, all researchers would agree that a consistent transformation should be followed.

Results

L 272- after drying, the viability loss occurred. However, Jaganathan et al. (2019) said the seeds can become dormant during drying. Indeed, you mentioned something about dormancy but did not test this.

L 281- what is semi-lethal?

L 295- Perhaps a better approach could include such analysis during seed development, at least from the maturation drying stage, i.e., when the pericarp colour starts to change.

Discussion

L 416- For P. chekiangensis seeds. What is this- this statement is incomplete.

L420- classifying them as recalcitrant seeds- there is something wrong with the whole sentence and expression.

L 434- I also think such variation might be due to family-level variation. Therefore, if possible, can you compare the seed coat structure and size of all these seeds in relation to the species studied here?

L442-462- The discussion of the resurrection plant is not necessary, in my opinion. You merely have to state this is the case in vegetative tissues and focus your attention on seeds.

L 475- From what is presented here, I don’t see any methods for evaluating the raffinose or other sugar during maturation.

The authors also speculate too much in the discussion and often mix desiccation-tolerant species results with the present study. It would be good if the authors toned down their arguments and placed more in the context of their results.

Minor comments:

Figure orders should be adjusted in the manuscript.

References

Jaganathan, G.K., Li, J., Yang, Y., Han, Y. and Liu, B. (2019) Complexities in identifying seed storage behavior of hard seed-coated species: a special focus on Lauraceae. Botany Letters. 166, 70-79.

Reviewer #2: The authors provided a precise study of the natural drying of seeds of endangered Chinese species Phoebe chekiangensis. Seeds seemed to be recalcitrant as most of them usually do not survive moisture content lower than 29%. The analysis of carbohydrate profile, content of starch and MDA, relative electrical conductivity and germination tests with precise statistical evaluation of obtained data would bring an interesting conclusion that the accumulation of reducing sugars fructose and glucose instead of non-reducing sugars sucrose and RFO (stachyose were not detected at all). Unfortunately,these data are not fully reliable, if you measured dead seeds (as you mentioned most of the seeds were dead at the moisture content below 28%) and if you calculate all values to fresh weight instead of dry weight. This is very important if the main changing parameter is moisture content.

In the description of methods, I would recommend to join into one chapter these chapters: 2.4, 2.4.1., 2.4.2. and 2.4.3. The last one is written like a protocol in the student notebook, please try to restyle into phrases. Chapter 2.5. could be divided into two chapters and not two subchapters.

Last but not least, I would recommend to submit this manuscript to some journal more releavnt to the topic and used methods, e.g., Seed Science and Technology.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript is well written but still have some grammatical errors such as: L 352. during this period, the seeds experienced severely damaged due to drying, with or L 416. The manuscript needs to be revised for such errors.

L 133. The formula should be provided at the end of this sentence.

L 311. % trehlose content increase (23.03) under drying seemed to be wrong. See Fig 2C

L 332-338. Concluding remarks (based on Fig 3) should be more precise and should be based on data obtained. Modify these sentences to draw more meaningful conclusions. Also check Fig 3C. It needs more clarity especially w.r.t. RS/NRS. Is it ratio of RS to NRS or something else?

L 389 – L 395. The relevance of correlation of germination with different parameters can be made more meaningful if glucose, fructose, galactose etc are also compared with germination. The Fig 6 failed to present meaningful information as it did not include data on above mentioned parameters. Moreover, there is no mention of positive and negative correlation. The Fig 5 and Fig 6 are almost similar and hence, one of the figures may be included as supplementary figure.

Similarly, for Fig 7, only those parameters that are significantly correlated to germination should be included for more meaningful presentation.

Discussion and conclusion parts also need refinements especially with respect to resurrection plants and recalcitrant plants. If sugar patterns are similar in both under drying, the present study apparently failed in its objective of understanding mechanisms leading to reduced germination under drying in the recalcitrant plant.

To draw meaningful conclusions, the seeds of P. chekiangensis must be rehydrated following drying to see if those resume physiological activities including germination following desiccation or not. Appropriate tables and figures related to this experiment may then be added to the manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ganesh K. Jaganathan

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Kamal Dev Sharma

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299669.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Jan 2024

Thank you very much for your efforts on our manuscripts, and we have responded to your constructive comments one by one. We hope our reply can make you satisfied, thank you again. We have uploaded a rebuttal letter named 'Response to reviewers '.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

pone.0299669.s003.docx (689.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Meenakshi Thakur

14 Feb 2024

Variation of sugar compounds in Phoebe chekiangensis seeds during natural desiccation

PONE-D-23-28564R1

Dear Dr. Handong Gao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Meenakshi Thakur, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Most of the comments of the reviewers have been justified by the authors. Hence, I am pleased to inform you that the manuscript can be accepted now for publication.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Meenakshi Thakur

28 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-28564R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gao,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Meenakshi Thakur

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Changes of soluble carbohydrates in seeds of Phoebe chekiangensis during desiccation.

    One-way ANOVA analysis was used for the data. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 level according to the Duncan test. Data represent mean ± SE. “-” means the data is not detected.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299669.s001.docx (18.1KB, docx)
    S1 Fig. Linear regression analysis between germination percentage and some sugar compounds.

    The regression line is represented by the black line. GP: Germination percentage, SS: Soluble sugar.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299669.s002.docx (216.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0299669.s003.docx (689.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES