Abstract
Fungal infections affect millions of people worldwide, and the several cases are related to invasive infections, which is a problem mainly for immunocompromised people, such as transplant and cancer patients with high mortality and morbidity rates. In addition, the number of emerging and multidrug-resistant fungal species has increased in the last decade. The search for new antifungal compounds is necessary, due to the increase in cases of resistance and the toxicity of drugs used in fungal infection treatment. This work aimed to study the antifungal activity of cercosporamide produced by Phaeosphaeriaceae GV-1. Cercosporamide was tested against pathogenic fungi by determining the minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum fungicidal (MFC) concentrations, using the broth microdilution method. Cercosporamide showed antifungal activity in vitro against 13 of 16 strains of medical importance tested, with the most susceptible species being Candida tropicalis, with MIC and MFC of 15.6 μg/mL. Thus, cercosporamide might be considered a promising therapeutic antifungal agent.
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity, Candida tropicalis, Fermentation, Minimum inhibitory concentration, Minimum fungicidal concentration
Introduction
Superficial fungal infections affect about 25% of the world population, being mainly caused by Candida species [1]. Invasive fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates in patients with compromised immune systems [1]. According to the World Health Organization, in 2016, deaths caused by fungal infections were the fifth leading cause of mortality in the world, and invasive infections are the most severe, causing about 1.6 million deaths per year [2].
Candida species are the most frequent causes of fungal infections, with Candida albicans being the most frequently isolated species, followed by Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida glabrata, with some clinical isolates resistant to the reported classes of antifungal agents. In addition, Candida auris and closed species have emerged, and they are considered multidrug-resistant strains [3]. There is also an increasing threat from pathogenic molds that are intrinsically resistant to a wide range of antifungals, such as Aspergillus terreus, Scedosporium spp., Fusarium spp., and members of the order Mucorales [4].
Currently, the therapeutic choices for the treatment of invasive fungal infections are limited to three main classes of antifungal agents: polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins. However, these drugs have several disadvantages associated to toxicity, spectrum of action, emergence of resistant strains, and unfavorable pharmacokinetic properties [5].
In previous studies by our research group, a fungus strain of the family Phaeosphaeriaceae was isolated from guava and identified as a producer of a metabolite compound with inhibitory activity against fungi of agricultural relevance [6]. The active principle related to this antifungal activity was identified as cercosporamide by chromatographic techniques coupled with mass spectrometry MS/MS and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [7]. There are few studies in the literature on cercosporamide (Fig. 1), but the existing ones report biological properties of great interest, such as anticancer activity, blood glucose reduction, herbicidal activity, and antifungal activity [9–12].
Fig. 1.

Cercosporamide chemical structure [8]
Cercosporamide is a highly selective inhibitor of Pkc1 (Protein kinase C-like 1), a protein kinase that mediates the maintenance of cell wall integrity, being essential for the biosynthesis of this structure. The signaling pathway mediated by Pkc1 is highly conserved in fungi, and the loss of the function of this protein leads to rapid cell autolysis, presenting great potential as a molecular target for the development of antifungal agents [8]. Cercosporamide is the only compound exhibiting antifungal activity associated with Pkc1 inhibition described in the literature, presenting a new strategy for the development of antifungal agents [13].
Therefore, this work aims to expand the knowledge about the properties of cercosporamide by evaluating the antifungal activity of cercosporamide produced by Phaeosphaeriaceae GV-1 against pathogenic fungi.
Material and methods
Microorganisms
A fungal isolate of the family Phaeosphaeriaceae (strain GV-1) was used for the production of cercosporamide, as described in previous reports [6, 7, 14]. The antifungal activity of cercosporamide was evaluated against 15 human pathogen species of yeasts and molds: Candida albicans (SC5314), Candida glabrata (ATCC 2001), Candida krusei (ATCC 6258), Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019), Candida tropicalis (ATCC 200956), Candida auris (CBS 10913 and CBS 12766), Candida duobushaemulonii (CBS 7799), Candida pseudohaemulonii (CBS 10004), Cryptococcus gattii (ATCC 56990), Cryptococcus neoformans (H99), Aspergillus fumigatus (ATCC 16913), Aspergillus flavus (998), Fusarium solani (CBS 224.34), Cunninghamella sp. (strain 196), and Lomentospora prolificans. The strains used are part of the culture collection from Laboratory of Antifungal Chemotherapy (LQA), Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, and stored in brain and hearth infusion broth with 20% glycerol at −80 °C.
Antifungals
Amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ), fluconazole (FLC), and caspofungin (CAS) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and the stock solutions were stored at −20 °C. For antifungal activity evaluation, the drugs were diluted to the final concentration in culture media.
Cercosporamide production
Fermentation was carried out in a bioreactor (New Brunswick Bioflo 310; 5 L; pitched blade impeller), using YM liquid medium (10 g/L glucose, 5 g/L peptone, 3 g/L malt extract, and 3 g/L yeast extract) at 25 °C/100 rpm for 96 h. Inoculation was performed with the fungus GV-1 previously activated in a Petri dish containing solid YM medium (20 g/L of agar), in the proportion of 1 cm2 of fungal culture per 100 mL of YM medium, crushed with Ultra Turrax IKA T25 [6].
The recovery and purification of cercosporamide (CCP) were carried out in accordance with the methodology described in a patent application filed by our research group [7]. For extraction, 200 mL of ethyl acetate was added to 200 mL of the fermented medium previously filtered in a 0.22-μm filter. After homogenization and phase separation, the acetoethylic phase was alkalinized with 40 mL of 0.1 M NaOH solution. Subsequently, the aqueous phase (alkaline CCP solution) was recovered and neutralized with 8 mL of 2 M HCl solution. The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.45-μm filter and dried at 50 °C overnight. According to the patent application, the powder obtained contained c.a. 94% CCP (% area at 254 nm), which is similar to the purity of the cercosporamide commercial standard (95%). This powder was stored in microtubes at −18 °C until use. For the antifungal tests, CCP-containing powder was solubilized in a 0.1 M NaOH solution, followed by pH correction to 7 with a 1 M HCl solution and adjustment to a concentration of 4000 μg/mL with sterile distilled water.
Antifungal activity evaluation
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by using the broth microdilution technique, following protocol M27-A3 for yeast and M38 for filamentous fungi [15, 16]. The concentrations tested for each compound ranged from 0.03 to 16 μg/mL (AMB, VCZ and CAS), 0.12 to 64 μg/mL (FLC), and 1.95 to 1000 μg/mL (CCP), diluted in RPMI 1640 medium buffered with 0.16 M MOPS into wells of a 96-well flat-bottom plate. The MIC values were determined by visual reading and were defined as the lowest concentration inhibiting 90% of fungal growth for AMB and 50% for other drugs and CCP.
To assess the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC), 10 μL aliquots from each well from the MIC assay that did not show visible growth were inoculated into Potato Dextrose Agar medium, and incubated at 35 °C for 48 h. MFC is defined as the lowest concentration that kills 99.9% of cells compared to the initial inoculum by colony forming unit count [17]. All determinations were performed in independent triplicates and two biological replicates. The final MIC and MFC values were considered modal mean.
Results
The growth of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei was not inhibited by CCP within the tested concentration range. All other yeasts were susceptible to the compound, with MIC ranging from 15.6 to 500 μg/mL and C. tropicalis being the most susceptible to CCP (MIC = 15.6 μg/mL) (Table 1). It is noteworthy that this strain presents resistance to AMB and azoles (VCZ and FLC) (Table 1). CCP had a fungicidal effect against C. auris CBS 12766, C. parapsilosis, C. duobushaemulonii, C. tropicalis, Cryptococcus gatti, and Cryptococcus neoformans, with concentrations from 15.6 to 1000 μg/mL (Table 2).
Table 1.
Inhibitory activity of amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ), fluconazole (FLC), caspofungin (CAS), and cercosporamide (CCP) against pathogenic yeasts
| Strains | MIC (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMB | VCZ | FLC | CAS | CCP | |
| Candida albicans | ≤0.03 | ≤0.03 | ≤0.12 | 0.06 | >1000 |
| Candida glabrata | ≤0.03 | 0.50 | 4SDD | 0.12 | >1000 |
| Candida krusei | 0.12 | 0.5 | >64R | 0.25 | >1000 |
| Candida parapsilosis | ≤0.03 | 0.06 | 1 | 0.50 | 250 |
| Candida tropicalis | 2R | >16R | >64R | 0.12 | 15.6 |
| Candida auris CBS 12766 | 0.25 | 0.50 | >64 | 0.25 | 500 |
| Candida auris CBS 10913 | 0.06 | ≤0.03 | 2 | <0.03 | 125 |
| Candida pseudohaemulonii | 2 | 0.12 | 4 | 0.12 | 125 |
| Candida duobushaemulonii | 0.50 | 2 | 8 | 0.06 | 62.5 |
| Cryptococcus neoformans | ≤0.03 | 0.06 | 2 | >16 | 62.5 |
| Cryptococcus gatti | ≤0.03 | 0.12 | 2 | 8 | 125 |
RResistant, SDDSusceptible-dose-dependent
Table 2.
Fungicidal effect of fluconazole (FLC) and cercosporamide (CCP) against pathogenic yeasts
| Strains | MFC (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| FLC | CCP | |
| Candida albicans | >64 | >1000 |
| Candida glabrata | 32 | >1000 |
| Candida krusei | >64 | >1000 |
| Candida parapsilosis | 2 | 500 |
| Candida tropicalis | >64 | 15.6 |
| Candida auris CBS 12766 | >64 | 1000 |
| Candida auris CBS 10913 | >64 | >1000 |
| Candida pseudohaemulonii | >64 | >1000 |
| Candida duobushaemulonii | >64 | 500 |
| Cryptococcus neoformans | 4 | 500 |
| Cryptococcus gatti | 8 | 125 |
The filamentous fungi showed less susceptibility to CCP, with MIC values ranging from 62.5 to 500 μg/mL (Table 3). Indeed, CCP had a fungicidal effect on all filamentous fungi tested, except for F. solani (Table 4). Cunninghamella sp. was the most susceptible to CCP, with MIC of 62.5 and MFC of 500 μg/mL, while this compound was the only one with fungicidal action against L. prolificans (MFC = 250 μg/mL), considering the ranges tested. All filamentous fungi were resistant to FLC, and only L. prolificans showed no resistance to CAS at the concentrations tested (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 3.
Inhibitory effect of amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ), fluconazole (FLC), caspofungin (CAS), and cercosporamide (CCP) against pathogenic filamentous fungi
| Strains | MIC (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMB | VCZ | FLC | CAS | CCP | |
| Aspergillus flavus | 0.12 | 0.06 | >64 | >16 | 500 |
| Aspergillus fumigatus | 0.12 | 0.50 | >64 | >16 | 500 |
| Fusarium solani | 0.50 | >16 | >64 | >16 | 250 |
| Lomentospora prolificans | 4 | 1 | >64 | 8 | 250 |
| Cunninghamella sp. | 0.5 | 1 | >64 | >16 | 62.5 |
Table 4.
Fungicidal effect of amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ), fluconazole (FLC), caspofungin (CAS), and cercosporamide (CCP) against pathogenic filamentous fungi
| Strains | MFC (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMB | VCZ | FLC | CAS | CCP | |
| Aspergillus flavus | 1 | >16 | >64 | >16 | 500 |
| Aspergillus fumigatus | 4 | 4 | >64 | >16 | 1000 |
| Fusarium solani | 0.50 | >16 | >64 | >16 | >1000 |
| Lomentospora prolificans | >16 | >16 | >64 | >16 | 250 |
| Cunninghamella sp. | 4 | >16 | >64 | >16 | 500 |
Discussion
Many of the clinical isolates of C. auris are resistant to standard antifungals, with some being reported to be multidrug-resistant, i.e., resistant to the three main classes of antifungal agents used: echinocandins, azoles, and polyenes. Its effective treatment is still a challenge, hence the great interest in the discovery of new compounds effective against C. auris [18]. The C. auris strains tested herein showed an intermediate susceptibility to CCP when compared with other fungal species tested in this study. The growth of C. auris CBS 12766 strain was inhibited by CCP with a MIC of 500 μg/mL and MFC of 1000 μg/mL, but this strain was resistant to FLC within the concentration range tested. In contrast, C. auris CBS 10913 was susceptible to all the compounds tested, being inhibited by CCP (MIC = 125 μg/mL), but with no fungicidal effect. These results are similar to the inhibition range obtained by other natural compounds, such as crotamine, which presented a 50% inhibition of C. auris growth at a concentration range of 400 to 800 μg/mL [19].
C. parapsilosis is one of the most common Candida species from the non-albicans group causing invasive candidiasis [20]. Synthetic arylquinuclidine derivatives, which are inhibitors of squalene synthase, have been tested against C. parapsilosis, and the most effective compound presented a MIC50 of 2 μg/mL, but no fungicidal effect [21]. In terms of CCP, a MIC value of 64 μg/mL was reported for C. parapsilosis [10], a lower value compared to the MIC obtained for this yeast in this study (250 μg/mL). Such variations are normally observed between different studies. For instance, MIC of CCP against C. albicans varied from 81 [10] to 10 μg/mL [8], depending on the study.
In this study, two species of the C. haemulonii complex were tested: C. pseudohaemulonii, for which CCP inhibited growth (MIC of 125 μg/mL) with no fungicidal effect; and C. duobushaemulonii, for which CCP inhibited growth (MIC of 62.5 μg/mL) and also presented a fungicidal effect (MFC of 500 μg/mL). These species belong to the family Metschnikowiaceae, which usually includes antifungal-resistant strains. Even though they are still not a frequent cause of candidemia, their genetic similarities with C. auris increase the awareness that species from this group may also emerge as drug-resistant pathogens in human populations [22]. In Korea, clinical isolates of C. pseudohaemulonii showed a MIC of 32 μg/mL for AMB, which is considered a high-level resistance for this drug [23], while clinical isolates of C. duobushaemulonii in Argentina had a MIC of 8, 128, 6.34, and 5.03 μg/mL for AMB, FLC, VCZ, and CAS, respectively [24].
The most susceptible yeast to CCP was C. tropicalis, which was inhibited at a concentration of 15.6 μg/mL, a concentration that also had a fungicidal effect. This strain of C. tropicalis was resistant to AMB and azoles as previously described [25]. C. tropicalis is the second most prevalent pathogenic Candida species (the first being C. albicans) and the most prevalent in the non-albicans Candida species group. The number of infections by C. tropicalis has increased dramatically worldwide, characterizing it as an emerging pathogenic yeast, and an aggravating factor in this scenario is the emergence of antifungal resistant isolates of C. tropicalis [26]. Clinical and experimental data suggest that morbidity and mortality rates are higher in infections by C. tropicalis than by C. albicans [27]. C. parapsilosis has been another threat in nosocomial environments with the recent emergence of multidrug-resistant and echinocandin-tolerant isolates [28]. Thus, the search for new antifungal compounds capable of inhibiting the growth of C. tropicalis, such as CCP, is of great interest. In former studies, the MIC50 values reported for C. tropicalis were 2 μg/mL (no fungicidal effect) for synthetic derivatives of arylquinuclidines [21], 8 μg/mL for the antimicrobial peptide Lycosine-I [29], and 125 μg/ mL for the essential oil of Pelargonium graveolens [30]. In terms of CCP, the MIC value was 128 μg/mL [10], considerably higher than the MIC obtained in this study.
Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic yeast responsible for cryptococcosis, a systemic infection clinically manifested as meningoencephalitis, from subacute to chronic, in immunocompromised patients. This condition is usually treated with AMB and flucytosine, but the high incidence of the disease, antifungal resistance, and the side effects caused by the drugs used have encouraged the search for alternatives to this treatment. The natural sources of antifungal agents against this yeast include thymol (MIC of 20 to 51 μg/mL and MFC in the range of 40 to 102 μg/mL depending on the strain) [31] and two new tetrahydrofuran derivatives isolated from the metabolites of Aspergillus sp. LS78 (MIC values of 50 and 128 μg/mL) [32]. The values for CCP obtained in this study for this yeast were in the same range as those examples.
Another Cryptococcus species evaluated in this study, C. gattii, can cause infections in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients, and may produce severe neurological sequelae. The natural compounds previously tested against this yeast were the hexane-soluble fraction of the leaves of Lippia sidoides (a plant used in Brazilian folk medicine as an antiseptic), showing MIC of 62.5 μg/mL [33], and the hexane fraction of Eugenia calycina (another plant used in Brazilian folk medicine), with MIC of 31.2 μg/mL [34]. These values were significantly lower than the results obtained for CCP in this study.
In terms of filamentous fungi, the two species of Aspergillus tested in this study may cause aspergillosis, which relates to a wide variety of diseases caused by Aspergillus species, mainly affecting the respiratory tract of immunocompromised people [35]. In this study, CCP inhibited the growth of these two species, but the values obtained (MIC of 500 μg/mL for both and MFC of 500 μg/mL and 1000 mg/mL for A. flavus and A. fumigatus, respectively) are much higher than the MIC previously reported for CCP against Aspergillus sp., i.e., 32 μg/mL [10].
The F. solani species complex is associated with fusariosis, usually presenting high MIC values for most of the therapeutic antifungal agents [36]. This was also observed in this study, since this fungus was not inhibited by most of the agents tested (except for AMB and CCP, but in this case at a relatively high concentration). The literature reports some active compounds against this species, such as polymyxin B (MIC ranging from 32 to 64 μg/ml and MFC from 32 and 128 μg/ml, depending on the clinical isolate) [37].
L. prolificans is commonly found in soil and polluted water and is increasingly recognized as a causal agent of severe invasive fungal infections, especially in stem cell and organ transplant patients, with a mortality rate reaching 90%. Treatment of these infections is challenging, since L. prolificans isolates are often drug resistant, with high MIC values for all commercially available antifungal agents. Thus, the combination of drugs (VCZ and terbinafine) is usually an option [38]. In this context, there is an interest in searching for new compounds with antifungal action against this fungus. An example is F901318, a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor with antifungal potential, which showed antifungal activity against L. prolificans isolates, with MIC values ranging from 0.12 to 0.25 μg/mL [39]. In this study, the L. prolificans strain was susceptible to CCP, but the MIC and MFC were relatively high (250 μg/mL). However, it is noteworthy that CCP was the only compound tested that showed a fungicidal effect against this fungus.
Cunninghamella species include ubiquitous filamentous fungi, and despite being less frequent, infections caused by Cunninghamella species have high mortality rates [40]. In the few cases reported in the literature, treatment is often performed with combinations of drugs, such as AMB, CAS, and isavuconazole, or single drugs, such as AMB, which compromised the patient’s renal function [41]. In this study, Cunninghamella sp. was the most susceptible filamentous fungi to CPP (MIC of 62.5 μg/mL and MFC of 500 μg/mL).
The concentrations of CCP that were tested are still higher than the concentrations of standard drugs, which are compounds that are already used in the treatment of fungal infections. However, the results for CCP are in a same concentration range as those previously obtained for other natural compounds. There is still no consensus on the acceptable level of inhibition for natural products, but some authors consider a MIC of up to 500 μg/mL as strong inhibition, values that were used as reference in studies of essential oils and plant extracts [42]. Thus, CCP can be considered in further investigations, not only for its unique mechanism of action, which can be useful to overcome drug resistance, but also considering that the activity of natural products can be enhanced by chemical modifications or improvements in drug delivering systems. This compound was also active against fungi with a long history of resistant strains, and it also presented a fungicidal effect against several strains.
Conclusion
The search for new compounds with antifungal activity is highly desirable given the limitations found for the drugs currently available, such as toxicological concerns, lack of efficacy, and, above all, increase in cases of resistance to antifungals. In this study, cercosporamide showed antifungal activity against important strains of pathogenic fungi, which are responsible for causing severe invasive infections in immunocompromised patients. Cercosporamide is still the only compound described so far that acts in the inhibition of Pkc1, with highly selective inhibition, which may encourage the detailed study of a new class of antifungals through its use and also the development of derivatives based on its structure, aiming at possible applications in the health area. Despite the fact that the results between the different groups of fungi tested in this study were highly variable to some extent, which might be an obstacle for considering CCP a promising therapeutic antifungal agent, this compound was particularly active against C. tropicalis, encouraging further evaluations of this natural compound in this regard.
Funding
This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq – Process numbers 143158/2018-0 and 303033/2021-5); Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES - process number 23038.000795/2018-61, finance code 001); and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP – 2020/04229-6 and 2021/01279-5).
Declarations
Competing interests
JLB and MYSK have two patent applications on the production and purification of cercosporamide resulting from their research on this subject.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NAR, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:1–10. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morosini L (2019) Avanço dos Fungos. Rev Radis 196: 26–33. https://radis.ensp.fiocruz.br/todas-edicoes/radis-196/
- 3.Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:134–140. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fisher MC, Hawkins NJ, Sanglard D, Gurr SJ. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science. 2018;360:739–742. doi: 10.1126/science.aap7999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campoy S, Adrio JL. Antifungals. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;133:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kanemaru MYS. Determinação do efeito antifúngico de Phaeosphaeria sp. isolado de goiaba contra fungos de relevância agroalimentar. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kanemaru MYS, Bicas JL, Fill TP, Santos E da C. Processo otimizado de recuperação e purificação de cercosporamida obtida por fermentação fúngica, Brasil: patent BR102020023293-2. Brazil; 2020.
- 8.Sussman A, Huss K, Chio LC, Heidler S, Shaw M, Ma D, et al. Discovery of cercosporamide, a known antifungal natural product, as a selective Pkc1 kinase inhibitor through high-throughput screening. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3:932–943. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.4.932-943.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sugawara F, Takahashi N, Strobel S, Strobel G, Larsen RD, Berglund DL, et al. The structure and biological activity of cercosporamide from Cercosporidium henningsii. J Org Chem. 1991;56:909–910. doi: 10.1021/jo00003a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Conover MA, Mierzwa R, King A, Loebenberg D, Bishop WR, Puar M, et al. Usnic acid amide, a phytotoxin and antifungal agent from Cercosporidium henningsii. Phytochemistry. 1992;31:2999–3001. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(92)83434-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Furukawa A, Arita T, Satoh S, Araki K, Kuroha M, Ohsumi J. (-)-Cercosporamide derivatives as novel antihyperglycemic agents. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2009;19:724–726. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen S, Cui L, Hu Q, Shen Y, Jiang Y, Zhao J. Preclinical evidence that MNK/eIF4E inhibition by cercosporamide enhances the response to antiangiogenic TKI and mTOR inhibitor in renal cell carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;530:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dao VH, Ourliac-Garnier I, Bazin MA, Jacquot C, Baratte B, Ruchaud S, et al. Benzofuro[3,2-d]pyrimidines inspired from cercosporamide CaPkc1 inhibitor: synthesis and evaluation of fluconazole susceptibility restoration. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2018;28:2250–2255. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kanemaru MYS, Santos E da C, Bicas JL. Processo de obtenção do fungo Phaeosphaeria sp. e seu caldo fermentado e seus usos, Brasil: patent BR102017027550 7. Brazil; 2017.
- 15.CLSI (2017) Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. CLSI standard M27-A3, vol 28, 4th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA, pp 1–25
- 16.CLSI . CLSI standard M38. 3. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi; pp. 1–62. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cantón E, Pemán J, Viudes A, Guillermo Q, Gobernado M, Espinel-Ingroffd A. Minimum fungicidal concentrations of amphotericin B for bloodstream Candida species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;45:203–206. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00525-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.ElBaradei A. A decade after the emergence of Candida auris: what do we know? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39:1617–1627. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03886-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Colombo AL, Dal Mas C, Rossato L, Shimizu T, Oliveira EB, Da Silva Junior PI, et al. Effects of the natural peptide crotamine from a South American rattlesnake on Candida auris, an emergent multidrug antifungal resistant human pathogen. Biomolecules. 2019;9:1–10. doi: 10.3390/biom9060205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xiao M, Fan X, Chen SCA, Wang H, Sun ZY, Liao K, et al. Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida glabrata species complex, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis species complex and Candida tropicalis causing invasive candidiasis in China: 3 year national surveillance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:802–810. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ishida K, Fernandes Rodrigues JC, Cammerer S, Urbina JA, Gilbert I, de Souza W, et al. Synthetic arylquinuclidine derivatives exhibit antifungal activity against Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilopsis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2011;10:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gade L, Muñoz JF, Sheth M, Wagner D, Berkow EL, Forsberg K, et al. Understanding the emergence of multidrug-resistant candida: using whole-genome sequencing to describe the population structure of Candida haemulonii species complex. Front Genet. 2020;11:1–15. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim MN, Shin JH, Sung H, Lee K, Kim EC, Ryoo N, et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in Korea: identification, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical features. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:57–61. doi: 10.1086/597108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Isla G, Taverna CG, Szusz W, Vivot W, García-Effron G, Davel G. Candida haemulonii sensu lato: update of the determination of susceptibility profile in Argentina and literature review. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2017;11:203–208. doi: 10.1007/s12281-017-0300-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Forastiero A, Mesa-Arango AC, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Alcazar-Fuoli L, Bernal-Martinez L, Pelaez T, et al. Candida tropicalis antifungal cross-resistance is related to different azole target (Erg11p) modifications. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(10):4769–4781. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00477-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lima R, Ribeiro FC, Colombo AL, de Almeida JN (2022) The emerging threat antifungal-resistant Candida tropicalis in humans, animals, and environment. Front Fungal Biol [Internet]:3 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffunb.2022.957021/full [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Kothavade RJ, Kura MM, Valand AG, Panthaki MH. Candida tropicalis: its prevalence, pathogenicity and increasing resistance to fluconazole. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:873–880. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.013227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Daneshnia F, de Almeida Júnior JN, Ilkit M, Lombardi L, Perry AM, Gao M, et al. Worldwide emergence of fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis: current framework and future research roadmap. Lancet Microbe [Internet] 2023;4:e470–e480. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00067-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tan L, Bai L, Wang L, He L, Li G, Du W, et al. Antifungal activity of spider venom-derived peptide lycosin-I against Candida tropicalis. Microbiol Res. 2018;216:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Souza CMC, Junior SAP, Moraes TDS, Damasceno JL, Mendes SA, Dias HJ, et al. Antifungal activity of plant-derived essential oils on Candida tropicalis planktonic and biofilms cells. Med Mycol. 2016;54:515–523. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Teixeira APDC, Nóbrega RDO, Lima EDO, Araújo WDO, Lima IDO. Antifungal activity study of the monoterpene thymol against Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat Prod Res. 2018;34:2630–2633. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1547296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu Y, Ding L, Zhang Z, Yan X, He S. New antifungal tetrahydrofuran derivatives from a marine sponge-associated fungus Aspergillus sp. LS78. Fitoterapia. 2020;146:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2020.104677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Morais SR, Oliveira TLS, de Oliveira LP, Tresvenzol LMF, da Conceição EC, Rezende MH, et al. Essential oil composition, antimicrobial and pharmacological activities of Lippia sidoides cham. (verbenaceae) from São Gonçalo do Abaeté, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Pharmacogn Mag. 2016;12:262–270. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.192197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ferreira FPS, Morais SR, Bara MTF, Conceição EC, Paula JR, Carvalho TC, et al. Eugenia calycina Cambess extracts and their fractions: their antimicrobial activity and the identification of major polar compounds using electrospray ionization FT-ICR mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;99:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Denardi LB, Dalla-Lana BH, de FPK J, Severo CB, Santurio JM, Zanette RA, et al. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus in Brazil. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2018;22:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.D’Agostino M, Lemmet T, Dufay C, Luc A, Frippiat JP, Machouart M, et al. Overinduction of CYP51A gene after exposure to azole antifungals provides a first clue to resistance mechanism in Fusarium solani species complex. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24:768–773. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hsu LH, Wang HF, Sun PL, Hu FR, Chen YL. The antibiotic polymyxin B exhibits novel antifungal activity against Fusarium species. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;49:740–748. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jenks JD, Seidel D, Cornely OA, Chen S, van Hal S, Kauffman C, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of invasive Lomentospora prolificans infections: analysis of patients in the FungiScope® registry. Mycoses. 2020;63:437–442. doi: 10.1111/myc.13067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wiederhold NP, Law D, Birch M. Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor F901318 has potent in vitro activity against Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:1977–1980. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Uno K, Hishiya N, Matsuda M, Kai Y, Amano M, Nakamura A, et al. Case of endobronchial metastasis from breast cancer accompanied with Cunninghamella bertholletiae tracheobronchial mycetoma. J Infect Chemother. 2019;25:1065–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jayasuriya NSS, Tilakaratne WM, Amaratunga EAPD, Ekanayake MKB. An unusual presentation of rhinofacial zygomycosis due to Cunninghamella sp. in an immunocompetent patient: a case report and literature review. Oral Dis. 2006;12:67–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Duarte MCT, Figueira GM, Sartoratto A, Rehder VLG, Delarmelina C. Anti-Candida activity of Brazilian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97:305–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
