Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1978 Jul;62(1):146–151. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.1.146

Water Permeability of Chlorella Cell Membranes by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Measured Diffusion Coefficients and Relaxation Times 1

Darryl G Stout 1,2,2, Peter L Steponkus 1,2,3, Larry D Bustard 1,2, Robert M Cotts 1,2
PMCID: PMC1092075  PMID: 16660456

Abstract

Measurement by two nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques of the mean residence time τa of water molecules inside Chlorella vulgaris (Beijerinck) var. “viridis” (Chodot) is reported. The first is the Conlon and Outhred (1972 Biochim Biophys Acta 288: 354-361) technique in which extracellular water is doped with paramagnetic Mn2+ ions. Some complications in application of this technique are identified as being caused by the affinity of Chlorella cell walls for Mn2+ ions which shortens the NMR relaxation times of intra- and extracellular water. The second is based upon observations of effects of diffusion on the spin echo of intra- and extracellular water. Echo attenuation of intracellular water is distinguished from that of extracellular water by the extent to which diffusive motion is restricted. Intracellular water, being restricted to the cell volume, suffers less echo attenuation. From the dependence of echo amplitude upon gradient strength at several values of echo time, the mean residence time of intracellular water can be determined. From the mean residence time of intracellular water, the diffusional water permeability coefficient of the Chlorella membrane is calculated to be 2.1 ± 0.4 × 10−3 cm sec−1.

Full text

PDF
146

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Conlon T., Outhred R. Water diffusion permeability of erythrocytes using an NMR technique. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Nov 2;288(2):354–361. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90256-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fabry M. E., Eisenstadt M. Water exchange between red cells and plasma. Measurement by nuclear magnetic relaxation. Biophys J. 1975 Nov;15(11):1101–1110. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85886-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gutknecht J. Permeability of Valonia to water and solutes: apparent absence of aqueous membrane pores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1968 Aug;163(1):20–29. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(68)90028-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hazlewood C. F., Chang D. C., Nichols B. L., Woessner D. E. Nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation times of water protons in skeletal muscle. Biophys J. 1974 Aug;14(8):583–606. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85937-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Palta J. P., Stadelmann E. J. Effect of turgor pressure on water permeability of Allium cepa epidermis cell membranes. J Membr Biol. 1977 May 12;33(3-4):231–247. doi: 10.1007/BF01869518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zimmermann U., Steudle E. The pressure-dependence of the hydraulic conductivity, the membrane resistance and membrane potential during turgor pressure regulation in Valonia utricularis. J Membr Biol. 1974;16(4):331–352. doi: 10.1007/BF01872422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES