Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to assess the coutilisation of oral rehydration solution (ORS) and zinc for treating diarrhoea and its associated factors among under-5 children in East Africa.
Design
Cross-sectional study design. Multilevel Poisson regression analysis with robust variance was fitted to identify predictors of zinc and ORS coutilisation. An adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) with a 95% CI was reported to declare the statistical significance.
Setting
Twelve East African countries.
Participants
16 850 under-5 children who had diarrhoea were included in the study.
Result
In East African nations, the coutilisation of ORS and zinc for the treatment of diarrhoea in children under 5 was 53.27% with a 95% CI (52.54% to 54.01%). Children of mothers with primary education (aPR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.20), secondary education (aPR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.14), higer education (aPR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.29), those from maternal age category of 20–24 (aPR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.21), age category of 25–29 (aPR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.21), age category of 30–34 (aPR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16), those from wealthy households (aPR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09) and those who have a media exposure (aPR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08) were more likely to receive combination.
Conclusion
Only half of the under-5 children with diarrhoea in East Africa were treated with a combination of ORS and zinc. To increase the use of the suggested combination therapy of ORS with zinc, it is important to empower women through education and prevent teen pregnancy.
Keywords: PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, Community child health, Paediatric infectious disease & immunisation
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.
This study was based on nationally representative large data and used appropriate statistical analysis techniques.
Despite the aforementioned strengths, the measure of zinc utilisation practice was based on the mother’s recall, which could lead to recall bias.
Second, the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) lacks information on zinc availability and the role of diet in zinc intake. As a result, we are unable to evaluate these factors.
Some East African countries are not included in the DHS programme. Furthermore, due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, a clear temporality (cause-and-effect relationship) between the dependent and independent variables was not established.
Background
Diarrhoea is three or more loose or watery stools in a 24-hour period, which can also present as a change in the volume, frequency or fluidity of faeces.1 Although there are easy ways to prevent and cure diarrhoea in children, it continues to be the world’s greatest cause of mortality and undernutrition in children under the age of 5.2 Each year, around 525 000 children under the age of 5 lose their lives to diarrhoea,3 and the data taken from the public WHO dataset, which included information from 195 nations between 2000 and 2017 findings showed that the largest frequency of diarrhoea-related mortality was found in Asian and African nations. The results of the spatial modelling also showed that, up until 2010, the majority of diarrhoea-related deaths occurred in Asian nations; however, in 2011, the majority of deaths moved to Africa.2 In East Africa, diarrhoeal-related under-5 mortality accounts from 2.1% in Tanzania,4 8% in Mozambique,5 8.8% in Ethiopia,6 9% in Kenya7 and 18.2% in Uganda.4
One of the top priorities for reducing unnecessary child deaths under the Sustainable Development Goal is treating diarrhoea.8 Up to 93% of diarrhoea-related death can be avoided using oral rehydration solution (ORS) and zinc, two very affordable and extremely effective diarrhoea therapies. Because of this, the WHO and the UNICEF suggest combining ORS with zinc for a successful therapy.9 10 Copackaging zinc with ORS has the potential to promote their combined usage, improve treatment access and maximise treatment use.11 The combination of zinc and ORS in a visually pleasing copack with counselling messages and instructions greatly enhanced healthcare providers’ prescribing practices and parents’ compliance with zinc administration.12 Another study conducted in Cambodia reached the same conclusion: copackaging is a useful strategy for promoting the combined utilisation of ORS and zinc.13
Zinc supplementation lessens the length and intensity of episodes and lowers the likelihood of recurrence in the short term,14 15 ORS contains trisodium citrate dehydrate, glucose, sodium chloride and potassium chloride which is important to replenishes the vital fluids and salts lost via diarrhoea.16 A study conducted on zinc supplementation at a Dhaka hospital (International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh) indicated that dehydration, bloody diarrhoea and fever were less with those under 5 children received a zinc for diarrhoea at home.17
However, the global prevalence of using ORS with zinc to treat diarrhoea continues to be alarmingly low.2 Less than 7% of children under the age of 5 in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) receive zinc treatment, according to a 2017 UNICEF report, and only 44% of them receive ORS.18 Access to this life-saving medicine might be made easier in many of these nations, many of which have high mortality rates from diarrhoea.19
In East Africa, only a small percentage of under-5 children receive effective treatment or ORS with Zinc for diarrhoeal disease. A study in Kenya mentioned that children treated with bundled ORS with zinc accounts for 15%,20 while another study in Ethiopia found only 16.65%.21 Another study conducted in Uganda mentioned that 30% of those under 5 children treated for diarrhoea took copacked ORS with zinc.22
According to studies done so far, maternal education, economic status, media exposure, residency, proximity to a medical facility and health insurance coverage have all been found to influence the combination of Zinc and ORS for the treatment of diarrhoea in under 5 children.21 23–25
Despite the clinical significance of using ORS and zinc together, and the recommendation of WHO and UNICEF for coutilisation of ORS and zinc, there is limited evidence of no research that ascertains the prevalence and contributing variables of ORS and zinc co-use among young children with diarrhoea in East Africa. So, in order to bridge this gap, a study was conducted. Since this study is the first of its kind in East Africa, policy-makers and those making decisions may potentially use it as a starting point when deciding how best to encourage uptake.
Methods
Data source, study setting and population
This study was based on the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 2011 to 2022 of 12 East African countries. Those countries are Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Comoros, Madagascar, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe. DHS is a nationally representative survey routinely conducted every 5 years and collects data on basic health indicators like mortality, morbidity, fertility, and maternal and child health-related characteristics. The study participants were selected using a two-stage stratified sampling technique used for the survey. In the first stage, enumeration areas (EAs) were randomly selected based on the country’s recent population, and using the housing census as a sampling frame, households were randomly selected in the second stage. Different datasets, including those for men, women, children, births and households, are included in each nation’s survey. For this study, the study population was under-5 children, thus, we used the kid’s record dataset (KR file). All children under-5 children in East Africa who had diarrhoea were the study’s source population. All under-5 children who had diarrhoea in the 2 weeks before the survey were the study population. In the current study, a weighted sample of 16 850 under-5 children was considered for final analysis. Details about DHS methodology can be accessed at https://dhsprogram.com/Methodology/index.cfm.
Study variables and definitions
Dependent variable
The coutilisation of ORS and zinc was dichotomised as ‘yes=1’ if the child uses both ORS and zinc for the treatment of childhood diarrhoea and ‘no=0’ if the child does not use both ORS and zinc for the treatment of childhood diarrhoea.
Independent variables
The independent variables were classified as community and individual-level variables. Individual-level factors were maternal age, educational status of the mother, father’s educational status, working status of the mother, wealth status, media exposure, sex of household head, health insurance and sex of the child. Distance to health facility, place of residence (urban or rural), community women’s education and community poverty level were considered as community-level factors.
Operational definition
Media exposure was created from three variables (frequency of listening to the radio, watching television and reading newspapers or magazines). In this study, women who listened to radio watched television, or read newspapers/magazines at least less than once a week were considered as having exposure to media (coded ‘yes’) and otherwise labelled as not having media exposure (coded ‘no’).
Community women’s education defined as the proportion of women in the cluster who pursued education at the primary, secondary and higher education levels. The aggregate of individual women’s primary, secondary and higher educational attainment can show the overall educational status of women within the cluster. They were categorised into two categories a higher proportion of women’s education within the cluster and a lower proportion of women’s education based on the national median value.
Community poverty status defined as the proportion of poor and poorest mothers within the cluster also can be defined as the household wealth index for each child. For each cluster, proportion of poor and poorest was aggregated and showed overall poverty status within the cluster. It was categorised into two categories based on the national median value a higher proportion of poor/poorest mothers and a lower proportion of mothers within a cluster.
Data management and statistical analysis
Data extraction, coding and analysis were done using Stata V.17 statistical software. To restore the data’s representativeness, an analysis was conducted using the weighted data. Considering the hierarchical structure of the DHS data, the clustering effect was assessed by estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC helps to determine whether there is a clustering effect present in the DHS data, which has a hierarchical structure. It is important to account for any clustering effect in the model to ensure accurate analysis. A significant clustering effect was observed according to the ICC (ICC>10%). Multilevel models are a statistical technique that is used to analyse data with hierarchical or clustered structures. Traditional multiple regression techniques treat observations as independent, which can lead to inaccurate results. In contrast, multilevel models account for the hierarchy of the data, which results in more accurate standard errors for regression coefficients. This makes them a powerful tool for analysing data with complex structures. In statistical analysis, the act of ignoring clustering effects can lead to an overstatement of statistical significance. Our study has demonstrated that when studying the coutilisation of individuals, multilevel models can provide a reliable approach to identifying cluster-level effects based on country or EA. By leveraging such models, we can better understand the nature of clustering and its impact on statistical significance, thereby ensuring the validity of our results. When the outcome is prevalent in the population, such as in the case where more than 10% of the population has coutilisation of ORS and zinc, the prevalence ratio (PR) is considered the preferred method of measuring the association between exposure and outcome. The PR provides a direct measure of how much more or less likely individuals with the exposure are to have the condition compared with those without the exposure. In our study, the OR should not be used, as it is only applicable for rare events. Using OR in our study may lead to overestimation of the effect sizes. This study was a cross-sectional study and the prevalence of coutilisation of ORS and zinc was greater than 10%, and if we report the OR, it could overestimate the association between coutilisation of ORS and zinc and the independent variables. As the PR is the best measure of association in these situations, multilevel Poisson regression analysis with robust variance was fitted to identify predictors of zinc and ORS coutilisation among under-5 children with diarrhoea. In the bivariable multilevel Poisson regression analysis, variables having a p<0.2 were considered for the multivariable analysis.
For the multilevel Poisson regression analysis, four models were constructed. The first model aimed to ascertain the degree of cluster variation in the coutilisation of zinc and ORS and it was a null model devoid of explanatory factors. The second model was fitted with individual-level variables, the third with community-level variables and the fourth with both individual and community-level variables at the same time. Because the models were nested, the deviance −2log-likelihood ratio was used to compare them, and the model with the lowest deviance was the best-fitted model for the data. Finally, the 95% CI for the adjusted PR (APR) was determined, and factors in the multivariable analysis with a p<0.05 were deemed significant predictors of the coutilisation of zinc and ORS among under-5 children with diarrhoea.
Patient and public involvement
In this study, the study participants and/or the public were not directly involved in the design, conduct, reporting and dissemination of this work.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics
A total weighted sample of 16 850 under-5 children who had diarrhoea within 2 weeks preceding the survey were included in this study. More than half, 8965 (53.20%) of the children were males while the vast majority (79.10%) of them resided in rural areas. The majority, 7778 (46.16%) were from poor households and 3666 (21.76%) had mothers who did not have a formal education. Only 818 (5.72%) were covered by health insurance (table 1).
Table 1.
Sociodemographic and economic characteristics of study participants in East Africa from 2011 to 2022
Variable | Weighted frequency | Per cent |
Individual level variables | ||
Sex of the child | ||
Male child | 8965 | 53.2 |
Female child | 7885 | 46.8 |
Age of the mother | ||
15–19 | 1433 | 8.51 |
20–24 | 4715 | 27.98 |
25–29 | 4545 | 26.97 |
30–34 | 3228 | 19.16 |
35–39 | 1965 | 11.66 |
40–44 | 757 | 4.49 |
45–49 | 206 | 1.22 |
Marital status | ||
Never in union | 965 | 5.73 |
Married/living together | 14 160 | 84.03 |
Divorced/widowed/separated | 1725 | 10.24 |
Maternal education | ||
No formal education | 3666 | 21.76 |
Primary | 8544 | 50.71 |
Secondary | 3942 | 23.4 |
Higher | 697 | 4.14 |
Father’s education (n=14 164) | ||
No formal education | 2667 | 18.83 |
Primary | 6842 | 48.31 |
Secondary | 3657 | 25.82 |
Higher | 997 | 7.04 |
Maternal current working status | ||
Not employed | 5747 | 34.11 |
Employed | 11 103 | 65.89 |
Sex of household head | ||
Male household head | 12 778 | 75.84 |
Female household head | 4072 | 24.16 |
Household wealth status | ||
Poor | 7778 | 46.16 |
Middle | 3218 | 19.1 |
Rich | 5854 | 34.74 |
Covered by health insurance (n=14 291) | ||
No | 13 472 | 94.28 |
Yes | 818 | 5.72 |
Media exposure | ||
No | 5959 | 35.36 |
Yes | 10 891 | 64.64 |
Community level variables | ||
Distance to health facility (n=15 498) | ||
Big problem | 6926 | 44.69 |
Not a big problem | 8572 | 55.31 |
Residence | ||
Urban | 3521 | 20.9 |
Rural | 13 329 | 79.1 |
Community educational status | ||
Low | 2996 | 17.78 |
High | 13 854 | 82.22 |
Community poverty level | ||
Low | 7695 | 45.67 |
High | 9155 | 54.33 |
The prevalence of ORS and zinc coutilisation for diarrhoea treatment
The pooled prevalence of coutilisation of ORS and zinc for the treatment of diarrhoea among under-5 children in East African countries was 53.27% with a 95% CI (52.54% to 54.01%). In East African countries, the prevalence of ORS and zinc coutilisation ranges from 24.36% (95% CI 21.85% to 26.86%) in Madagascar to 69.32% (95% CI 67.76% to 70.87%) in Malawi (figure 1).
Figure 1.
Forest plot of pooled prevalence of coutilisation of ORS and zinc for management of diarrhoea among under-5 children in East Africa from 2011 to 2022. ORS, oral rehydration solution.
Random effect and model comparison
To evaluate the random or clustering effect using the ICC, we used deviance for model comparison. The null model’s ICC of 0.145 indicated that unmeasured or unmeasurable factors (random effects) accounted for about 14.5% of the variance in the coutilisation of zinc and ORS. In terms of comparing models, the best-fitted model was the final model, which had a lower deviance (table 2).
Table 2.
Random effect and model comparison for factors associated with coutilisation of ORS and zinc for management of diarrhoea among under-5 children in East Africa from 2011 to 2022
Null model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
ICC | 14.56% | 15.31% | 15.01% | 15.01% |
Log-likelihood | −14 402.21 | −14 369.22 | −14 398.24 | −14 367.59 |
Deviance | 28 804.42 | 28 738.44 | 28 796.48 | 28 735.18 |
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; ORS, oral rehydration solution.
Factors associated with coutilisation of ORS and zinc for under-5 diarrhoea treatment
A multilevel bivariable analysis was done to assess the crude relationship between the independent variables and ORS-zinc coutilisation. Among the variables included in the bi-variable analysis only maternal age, maternal education status, wealth index, maternal employment status, media exposure, community-level illiteracy and community-level poverty showed a statistically significant association with ORS and zinc coutilisation at a p<0.20.
In the final model, maternal age, maternal education status, wealth index and media exposure were significantly associated with ORS and zinc coutilisation (p≤0.05). The prevalence of ORS and zinc coutilisation was 1.14 (APR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 o1.21), 1.13 (APR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06, 1.21) and 1.09 (APR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16) times higher in children whose mothers were aged 20–24, 25–29 and 30–34, respectively, in comparison to mother aged 15–19. Being the child of a woman with a primary, secondary or higher level of education raises the prevalence of coutilisation by 1.15, 1.08 and 1.19, respectively. Compared with children from poor household wealth index, those children from rich wealth index had a 4% higher prevalence of ORS and zinc coutilisation. The prevalence of ORS and zinc coutilisation among children whose mothers had media exposure was 1.04 times higher as compared with their counterparts (APR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08) (table 3).
Table 3.
Factors associated with coutilisation of ORS and zinc for management of diarrhoea among under-5 children in East Africa from 2011 to 2022
Variable | ORS and zinc coutilisation | CPR (95% CI) | APR (95% CI) | P value | |
Individual-level variables | No (%) | Yes (%) | |||
Age of the mother | |||||
15–19 | 746 (52.03) | 687 (47.97) | 1 | 1 | <0.01 |
20–24 | 2106 (44.67) | 2609 (55.33) | 1.13 (1.06 to 1.2) | 1.14 (1.07 to 1.2)* | <0.01 |
25–29 | 2026 (44.57) | 2519 (55.43) | 1.12 (1.05 to 1.2) | 1.13 (1.06 to1.2)* | <0.01 |
30–34 | 1573 (48.73) | 1654 (51.27) | 1.06 (0.99 to 1.1) | 1.09 (1.02 to 1.2)* | 0.256 |
35–39 | 982 (49.99) | 982 (50.01) | 1.01 (0.94 to 1.1) | 1.04 (0.97 to 1.1) | 0.929 |
40–44 | 400 (52.90) | 357 (47.10) | 0.95 (0.87 to 1.0) | 1.00 (0.92 to 1.1) | 0.53 |
45–49 | 106 (51.32) | 100 (48.68) | 0.98 (0.85 to 1.1) | 1.05 (0.91 to 1.2) | |
Maternal educational status | |||||
No formal education | 2004 (54.67) | 1662 (45.33) | 1 | 1 | <0.01 |
Primary | 3873 (45.33) | 4671 (54.67) | 1.17 (1.12 to 1.2) | 1.15 (1.09 to 1.2)* | <0.08 |
Secondary | 1806 (45.81) | 2136 (54.19) | 1.14 (1.08 to 1.2) | 1.08 (1.02 to 1.1)* | <0.01 |
Higher | 256 (36.75) | 440 (63.25) | 1.28 (1.19 to 1.4) | 1.19 (1.10 to 1.3)* | |
Household wealth index | |||||
Poor | 3819 (49.10) | 3958 (50.90) | 1 | 1 | 0.137 |
Middle | 1511 (46.96) | 1707 (53.04) | 1.05 (1.01 to 1.1) | 1.03 (0.99 to 1.1) | 0.042 |
Rich | 2609 (44.57) | 3245 (55.43) | 1.07 (1.03 to 1.1) | 1.04 (1.01 to 1.1)* | |
Maternal employment status | |||||
Not employed | 2769 (48.19) | 2977 (51.81) | 1 | 1 | 0.08 |
Employed | 5170 (46.57) | 5933 (53.43) | 0.98 (0.95 to 1.1) | 0.97 (0.94 to 1.04) | |
Media exposure | |||||
No | 3022 (50.72) | 2936 (49.28) | 1 | 1 | 0.046 |
Yes | 4917 (45.15) | 5974 (54.85) | 1.08 (1.04 to 1.1) | 1.04 (1.01 to 1.1)* | |
Community illiteracy level | |||||
Low | 1287 (42.96) | 1709 (57.04) | 1 | 1 | 0.065 |
High | 6653 (48.02) | 7201 (51.98) | 0.92 (0.89 to 0.9) | 0.96 (0.92 to 1.03) | |
Community poverty level | |||||
Low | 3641 (47.32) | 4053 (52.68) | 1 | 1 | 0.095 |
High | 4298 (46.95) | 4857 (53.05) | 0.99 (0.97 to 1.0) | 1.03 (0.99 to 1.1) |
*p≤0.05.
APR, adjusted prevalence ratio; CPR, crude PR; ORS, oral rehydration solution.
Discussion
This study aimed to assess the factors associated with the co-use of ORS and zinc for the treatment of diarrhoea in under-5 children across East African countries. In our study, the co-use of ORS and zinc was associated with the mother’s age, her educational level, family’s financial status and media exposure.
This study mentioned maternal age above 20 is associated with coutilisation of ORS and zinc and this finding is supported by different study conducted in Nigeria.26 The possible reason for this finding is older mothers were more likely than younger mothers to be knowledgeable about paediatric diarrhoea and how to treat it, younger mothers do not have as much exposure as older mothers about child diarrhoea and its management as maternal age can have impact on their knowledge about and how to treat it.27 This study found that maternal educational status was associated with the usage of ORS with zinc to treat under-5 diarrhoeal disease and this finding is supported by studies conducted in Pakistan,28 India,29 Nigeria,23 Cameron,30 Kenya31 and Ethiopia.21 25 32–34 This may be because educated women are more likely to take sick children to the medical facility and a woman with education is more likely than a mother without education to take her ill kid for follow-up as well as to take the ordered medication as per recommended. In addition to the above reason, educated mothers have a better awareness regarding the health problems of their kids than a mother without education.35 36
Our study mentioned that media exposure was one of the factors associated with diarrhoeal treatment using ORS with zinc. This finding is in line with studies conducted in India,29 Bangladesh,37 Ghana38 and Ethiopia.25 34 This may be due to the media’s important role in increasing the mother’s or caregiver’s understanding and awareness of the best ways to treat diarrhoea in children.37
As this study finds, a family’s wealth status affects the usage of ORS with zinc. This finding is supported by different studies conducted in India39 and Ethiopia.25 This is due to the fact that low-income households in LMICs, such as those in Africa, particularly in East Africa, cannot afford the expenses of healthcare services, including ORS and zinc. Thus, when children from low-income households get diarrhoea, they might not receive ORS with zinc.40
Our study was based on nationally representative large data and used appropriate statistical analysis techniques. Despite the aforementioned strengths, the measure of zinc utilisation practice was based on the mother’s recall, which could lead to recall bias. Second, the DHS survey lacks information on zinc availability and the role of diet in zinc intake. As a result, we are unable to evaluate these factors. Additionally, some East African countries are not included in the DHS programme. Furthermore, due to the cross-sectional nature of the data, a clear temporality (cause-and-effect relationship) between the dependent and independent variables was not established.
Conclusion
In this study, media exposure, rich household wealth status, maternal education and maternal age over 20 were associated factors for ORS and zinc co-use. To raise the prevalence of ORS and zinc coutilisation for the successful treatment of diarrhoea in children under the age of 5, it is advised to increase media exposure, maternal education and support the household wealth index. Using media as tool to advertise the importance of the coutilisation of ORS and zinc for all community will increase and boost the utilisation of the product. Empowering women through education also will raise the coutilisation of ORS and zinc. In addition, policies and intervention programmes that aim to stop unnecessary deaths of children under the age of 5 should be prioritised by preventing adolescent pregnancy.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We express our gratitude to the MEASURE DHS for providing the study's dataset.
Footnotes
Contributors: Conceptualisation: BTL and BLS. Data curation: BTL and BLS. Formal analysis: BLS and BTL. Investigation: BTL and BLS. Methodology: BLS and BTL. Software: BTL and BLS. Validation: BLS, BTL, WTW, GDG and YTW. Writing–original draft: BTL and BLS. Writing–review and editing: BLS, BTL, WTW, GDG and YTW. BTL is a guarantor of this study.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request. Through an online request to http://www.dhsprogram.com, permission to access the measure demographic and health survey data used in this study was obtained. Data from the official program database are accessible to the public.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
References
- 1. Guarino A, Dupont C, Gorelov AV, et al. The management of acute diarrhea in children in developed and developing areas: from evidence base to clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012;13:17–26. 10.1517/14656566.2011.634800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Almasi A, Zangeneh A, Ziapour A, et al. Investigating global spatial patterns of diarrhea-related mortality in children under five. Front Public Health 2022;10:861629. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mokomane M, Kasvosve I, de Melo E, et al. The global problem of childhood diarrhoeal diseases: emerging strategies in prevention and management. Ther Adv Infect Dis 2018;5:29–43. 10.1177/2049936117744429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rahman AE, Moinuddin M, Molla M, et al. Childhood diarrhoeal deaths in seven low-and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92:664–71. 10.2471/BLT.13.134809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Acácio S, Mandomando I, Nhampossa T, et al. Risk factors for death among children 0–59 months of age with moderate-to-severe diarrhea in Manhiça district, Southern Mozambique. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:322.:322. 10.1186/s12879-019-3948-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. CSA IJAA . Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Central Statistical Agency; 2012. 430. [Google Scholar]
- 7. O’Reilly CE, Jaron P, Ochieng B, et al. Risk factors for death among children less than 5 years old hospitalized with diarrhea in rural Western Kenya, 2005–2007: a cohort study. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001256. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lee BX, Kjaerulf F, Turner S, et al. Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. J Public Health Policy 2016;37 Suppl 1:13–31. 10.1057/s41271-016-0002-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Qazi S, Aboubaker S, MacLean R, et al. Ending preventable child deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea by 2025. Develop Integrated Global Action Plan Prevention Control Pneumonia Diarrhoea 2015;100(Suppl 1):S23–8. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Black R, Fontaine O, Lamberti L, et al. Drivers of the reduction in childhood diarrhea mortality 1980-2015 and interventions to eliminate preventable diarrhea deaths by. J Glob Health 2019;9:020801. 10.7189/jogh.09.020801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hill S, Yang A, Bero L. Priority medicines for maternal and child health: a global survey of national essential medicines lists. PLoS One 2012;7:e38055. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Roche M, García Meza R, Vossenaar M. An intervention to Co‐Package zinc and oral rehydration salts (ORS) improves health provider prescription and maternal adherence to WHO‐Recommended diarrhea treatment in Western Guatemala. FASEB J 2015;29:902. 10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.902.23 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Borapich D, Warsh M, Borapich D, et al. Improving child health in Cambodia: social marketing of diarrhea treatment kit, results of a pilot project. Cases Public Health Commun Market 2010;4:22. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Barffour MA, Hinnouho G-M, Wessells KR, et al. Effects of therapeutic zinc supplementation for diarrhea and two preventive zinc supplementation regimens on the incidence and duration of diarrhea and acute respiratory tract infections in rural Laotian children: a randomized controlled trial. J Glob Health 2020;10:010424. 10.7189/jogh.10.010424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lazzerini M, Ronfani L. Oral zinc for treating diarrhoea in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;2016:CD005436. 10.1002/14651858.CD005436.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. World Health Organization . Ending preventable child deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea by 2025: the integrated global action plan for pneumonia and diarrhoea (GAPPD). 2013. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17. Alam J, Nuzhat S, Billal SM, et al. Nutritional profiles and zinc supplementation among children with diarrhea in Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2023;108:837–43. 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gona PN, Gona CM, Chikwasha V, et al. Oral Rehydration solution coverage in under 5 children with diarrhea: a tri-country, Subnational, cross-sectional comparative analysis of two demographic health surveys cycles. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1–15. 10.1186/s12889-020-09811-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mohamed SOO, Alawad MOA, Ahmed AAM, et al. Access to oral rehydration solution and zinc supplementation for treatment of childhood diarrhoeal diseases in Sudan. BMC Res Notes 2020;13:427. 10.1186/s13104-020-05268-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lam F, Wentworth L, Cherutich P, et al. An evaluation of a national oral rehydration solution and zinc scale-up program in Kenya between 2011 and. Journal of Global Health 2019;9. 10.7189/jogh.09.010505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kassa SF, Alemu TG, Techane MA, et al. The Co-utilization of oral rehydration solution and zinc for treating diarrhea and its associated factors among under-five children in Ethiopia: further analysis of EDHS. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022;16:1713–21. 10.2147/PPA.S356557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lam F, Kirchhoffer D, Buluma DM, et al. A retrospective mixed-methods evaluation of a national ORS and zinc scale-up program in Uganda between 2011 and. J Glob Health 2019;9:010504. 10.7189/jogh.09.010504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gwarzo GD. Mothers’ awareness and use of zinc in under-five children with diarrhoea in North-Western Nigeria. Nigerian J Paediatrics 2018;45:81–5. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ajayi DT, Bello O. Determinants of oral rehydration solution and zinc use among under-five children for the management of diarrhea in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Arch Bas App Med 2019;7:35–9. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Negesse Y, Fetene Abebe G, Addisu A, et al. The magnitude of oral rehydration salt utilization in diarrhea hot spot regions of Ethiopia and its associated factors among under-five children. Front Public Health 2022;10:960627. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.960627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Okafor IP, Akinyemi OT, Wika-Kobani BN, et al. Childhood diarrhoea: a cross-sectional survey on maternal knowledge, hygienic practices and use of oral zinc for home management in a Nigerian community. Pan Afr Med J 2022;42:123. 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.123.33829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Okoh B, Alex–Hart B. Home management of diarrhoea by caregivers presenting at the diarrhoea training unit of a tertiary hospital in Southern Nigeria. BJMMR 2014;4:5524–40. 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/11340 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Duggal MN, Bari A, Mansoor A, et al. Awareness of quantity of ORS and zinc among mothers of under five children with diarrhoea at a tertiary care centre Lahore. J Pak Med Assoc 2021;71:921–4. 10.47391/JPMA.264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lam F, Pro G, Agrawal S, et al. Effect of enhanced detailing and mass media on community use of oral rehydration salts and zinc during a scale-up program in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh. J Glob Health 2019;9:010501. 10.7189/jogh.09.010501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Essomba N, Kedy Koum D, Adiogo D, et al. Use of oral rehydration therapy in the treatment of childhood diarrhoea in Douala. Mal Med J 2015;27:60. 10.4314/mmj.v27i2.6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Njeri G, Muriithi MJESJ. Household choice of diarrhea treatments for children under the age of five in Kenya: evidence from the Kenya demographic and health survey 2008-09. 2013;9:77–91. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ayele E, Tasew H, Mariye T, et al. Zinc utilization and associated factors among under-five children having acute diarrhea in Kebri-Dehar town, Somali region, Ethiopia-2017. PLM 2020;4:15. 10.11648/j.plm.20200401.13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Terefa DR, Shama AT, Kenea AK. Sociodemographic and institutional determinants of zinc bundled with oral Rehydration salt utilisation among under-five children with Diarrhoeal diseases in East Wallaga zone, Western Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2023;13:e070203. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Teshale AB, Liyew AM, Tesema GAJBPH. Factors associated with zinc utilization for the management of diarrhea in under-five children in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1–7. 10.1186/s12889-020-09541-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Adane M, Mengistie B, Mulat W, et al. Utilization of health facilities and predictors of health-seeking behavior for under-five children with acute diarrhea in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. J Health Popul Nutr 2017;36:9.:9. 10.1186/s41043-017-0085-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Apuleni G, Jacobs C, Musonda P. Predictors of health seeking Behaviours for common childhood illnesses in poor resource settings in Zambia, a community cross sectional study. Front Public Health 2021;9:569569. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.569569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Alam Z, Higuchi M, Sarker MAB, et al. Mass media exposure and childhood diarrhea: a secondary analysis of the 2011 Bangladesh demographic and health survey. Nagoya J Med Sci 2019;81:31–40. 10.18999/nagjms.81.1.31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. El-Khoury M, Banke K, Sloane P. Improved childhood diarrhea treatment practices in Ghana: a pre-post evaluation of a comprehensive private-sector program. Glob Health Sci Pract 2016;4:264–75. 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bawankule R, Singh A, Kumar K, et al. Disposal of children’s stools and its association with childhood diarrhea in India. BMC Public Health 2017;17:.:12. 10.1186/s12889-016-3948-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Braimoh T, Danat I, Abubakar M, et al. Private health care market shaping and changes in inequities in childhood diarrhoea treatment coverage: evidence from the analysis of baseline and Endline surveys of an ORS and zinc scale-up program in Nigeria. Int J Equity Health 2021;20:88. 10.1186/s12939-021-01425-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available on reasonable request. Through an online request to http://www.dhsprogram.com, permission to access the measure demographic and health survey data used in this study was obtained. Data from the official program database are accessible to the public.