Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transpl Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 2;25(3):e14059. doi: 10.1111/tid.14059

Investigation of donor-derived Strongyloides stercoralis infection in multiple solid organ transplant recipients—California, Michigan, Ohio, 2022

AdeSubomi Adeyemo 1,2, Susan Montgomery 1, Rebecca J Chancey 1, Pallavi Annambhotla 1, Lilly Barba 3, Tyan Clarke 4, Jonathan Williams 5, Anne Malilay 5, Joseph Coyle 6
PMCID: PMC10921863  NIHMSID: NIHMS1965622  PMID: 37005911

Abstract

Background:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention led an investigation to determine if Strongyloides infection in a right kidney recipient was an existing chronic infection, or if the infection was transmitted from an infected organ donor.

Methods:

Evidence regarding the organ donor and organ recipients Strongyloides testing, treatment, and risk factors were gathered and evaluated. The case classification algorithm created by the Disease Transmission Advisory Committee was utilized.

Results:

The organ donor had risk factors for Strongyloides infection; the banked donor specimen, submitted for serology testing 112 days post-donor death, was positive. The right kidney recipient was negative for Strongyloides infection pretransplant. Strongyloides infection was diagnosed via small bowel and stomach biopsies. The left kidney recipient had risk factors for Strongyloides infection. Two posttransplant Strongyloides antibody tests were negative at 59 and 116 days posttransplant; repeat antibody tests returned positive at 158 and 190 days posttransplant.

Examination of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid collected 110 days posttransplant from the heart recipient showed a parasite morphologically consistent with Strongyloides species. She subsequently developed complications from Strongyloides infection, including hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis. Based on the evidence from our investigation, donor-derived strongyloidiasis was suspected in one recipient and proven in two recipients.

Conclusion:

The results of this investigation support the importance of preventing donor-derived Strongyloides infections by laboratory-based serology testing of solid organ donors. Donor positive testing results would direct the monitoring and treatment of recipients to avoid severe complications.

Keywords: donor-derived, parasitic infection, Strongyloides stercoralis, transplant

1 |. INTRODUCTION

Solid organ transplantation can improve the quality of life for individuals around the country and across the world. In 2020, over 129 000 organs from 36 125 deceased donors were transplanted worldwide.1 In 2021, 34 814 transplants from over 13 800 deceased donors occurred in the United States (US).2,3 However, the organ transplant process is not without risks of significant morbidity and mortality from complications of donor-derived infections including with the parasite Strongyloides stercoralis. Strongyloides stercoralis is a soil-transmitted helminth; infection is acquired when parasite larvae penetrate the human skin, migrating through the bloodstream, lungs, and other organs until they reach the small intestine. Transmission may occur in endemic areas where access to quality sanitation is low. Risk factors for exposure include activities that increase one’s exposure to contaminated soil (e.g., farming and walking barefoot).4 Strongyloides stercoralis is endemic in many parts of the world; locally acquired infections have been reported in parts of the southeastern United States.5

Due to this parasite’s unusual capability for autoinfection, Strongyloides infection can persist for years, or even a lifetime, if no treatment occurs. Chronic infection is usually asymptomatic but can cause severe illness in people taking immunosuppressive therapies, leading to possible transplant-associated transmission from infected organ donors as well as development of severe symptoms in chronically infected recipients. Organ transplant recipients infected with Strongyloides stercoralis are at risk of developing significant complications including hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated disease, both of which are associated with high mortality.5 Preventive treatment of recipients with ivermectin averts donor-derived complications. Although screening is required for many infections, organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are not required to test solid organ donors for Strongyloides infection; however, studies among immigrants have shown as high as 46.1% of the study population infected.4

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC)—the independent committee responsible for reviewing potential transplant-related disease transmission matters—was informed of a possible donor-derived Strongyloides event in a right kidney transplant recipient in December 2021. The right kidney recipient developed strongyloidiasis 102 days posttransplant. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of the DTAC, led an investigation to determine if infection in the right kidney recipient was an existing chronic infection or if the infection was transmitted from the donor.

2 |. METHODS

CDC, in collaboration with state health departments, worked with the OPO and transplant center coordinators to conduct the investigation. Three organs—the right kidney, left kidney, and the heart— were procured from the donor and were transplanted into three individuals who resided in three different states. To assess whether the organ donor was infected, the OPO submitted a banked donor serum specimen for Strongyloides serology testing. Transplant center coordinators provided information about each recipient’s pre- and posttransplant Strongyloides testing, treatment and clinical course, and risk factors for exposure. The case classification algorithm created by DTAC was used to determine case status6; in brief, recipients were evaluated for strength of evidence for disease transmission, if transmission was excluded, or if they were treated (intervention) without disease transmission.

3 |. RESULTS

The organ donor was a 49-year-old man who emigrated from Mexico at age 16 and worked in landscaping. He died due to injuries from a motor vehicle collision. Strongyloides screening was not performed at the time of organ procurement. The banked donor specimen yielded positive results for Strongyloides infection with a result of 2.8 IV (index value) on ARUP laboratories antibody IgG ELISA test (reference value of 1.1 IV or greater = observation of positive IgG antibodies to Strongyloides).7 The donor was believed to be asymptomatic.

The right kidney transplant recipient was a 50-year-old woman born in the United States who had traveled to Canada and Australia in her twenties. Results of her serological testing pretransplant were negative for Strongyloides antibodies. The recipient was hospitalized 98 days posttransplant with complaints of nausea and vomiting and intermittent upper abdominal pain. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed which revealed severe gastritis and duodenitis. Consequently, small bowel and stomach biopsies were taken at 102 days posttransplant, which revealed parasitic organisms morphologically consistent with Strongyloides stercoralis. Results of repeat serological testing were positive for Strongyloides antibodies. The patient was started on ivermectin. The patient underwent paracentesis, and ascitic fluid culture revealed Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. The patient was treated with linezolid. As of 17 weeks posttransplant, the patient was asymptomatic.

The left kidney recipient was a 49-year-old woman born in Mexico. She had lived in rural California for 3 years, where she cared for farm animals. She was not tested for Strongyloides infection prior to transplant. Two months posttransplant, the recipient was hospitalized due to abdominal pain and diarrhea; 47% peripheral eosinophilia was noted prompting an infectious disease work up. Strongyloides serology testing was done at 59 days posttransplant and again at 116 days posttransplant; both tests were negative. Presumptive treatment with ivermectin was started 116 days posttransplant. Repeat Strongyloides antibody tests returned positive at 158 and 190 days posttransplant. This patient underwent concurrent therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin for recurrent vasculitis.

The heart recipient was a 43-year-old woman born in the United States. Her travel history was unknown. She was not screened for Strongyloides infection prior to transplant. The recipient was hospitalized 88 days posttransplant due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli bacteremia, which resolved. She was hospitalized again 106 days posttransplant with gastrointestinal complaints due to diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis. Examination of bronchial alveolar lavage fluid collected 110 days posttransplant showed a parasite morphologically consistent with Strongyloides species. The recipient was started on ivermectin 108 days posttransplant. On 131 days posttransplant she developed complications from Strongyloides infection including hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis with central nervous system involvement; she was treated with oral ivermectin and albendazole. Her condition deteriorated, and she required veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The healthcare provider applied for a Food and Drug Administration investigational new drug to administer the veterinary formulation of injectable ivermectin subcutaneously. The recipient developed vancomycin resistant Enterococci meningitis that was believed to be introduced by Strongyloides larvae crossing the blood brain barrier. Through coordinated care by the healthcare facility, the recipient’s condition improved allowing her to be transferred to an in-patient rehabilitation center.

Based on the information learned during the investigation and utilizing the DTAC case classification algorithm, the case determination was proven in two recipients—the right kidney and heart transplant recipients—and suspected in one recipient—the left kidney recipient (Table 1).

Table 1.

Donor-Derived Strongyloides Infection Investigation Summary

Demographics Pre-transplant Strongyloides Serology Testing Result Post-transplant Strongyloides Diagnostic(s) Donor-Derived Infection Case Status
Organ Donor 49-year-old Male Test not completed • Positive serology test Not applicable
Right Kidney Recipient 50-year-old Female Negative • Positive small bowel and stomach biopsies
• Positive serology test
Proven
Left Kidney Recipient 49-year-old Male Test not completed • 2 Negative serology tests
• 2 Positive serology tests
Suspected
Heart Recipient 43-year-old Female Test not completed • Positive bronchial alveolar lavage fluid Proven

4 |. DISCUSSION

The results of this investigation support the importance of preventing donor-derived Strongyloides infections by laboratory-based serology testing of solid organ donors. The donor in our investigation was born in a Strongyloides endemic region and worked in an occupation that allowed for potential exposure to contaminated soil; however, a policy requiring Strongyloides serology testing was absent at the time of organ procurement. Testing of the banked donor specimen was prompted only after the right kidney transplant recipient had already developed strongyloidiasis. A policy proposal that will require screening of all deceased organ donors for Strongyloides via serology testing is currently being considered by the DTAC.8

An algorithm for screening both transplant donor(s) and recipient(s) has been proposed by Abad et al. The proposed algorithm includes prophylaxis for individuals receiving an organ from a high-risk deceased donor (individuals with epidemiological exposure and positive serology and/or peripheral eosinophilia)9.

If the donor had been screened for infection at the time of organ procurement, prophylactic ivermectin treatment could have prevented the serious outcomes. Testing solid organ donors for Strongyloides infection would not delay or prevent transplant. Donor positive testing results would direct the monitoring and treatment of recipients to avoid severe complications, including secondary bacterial infections. The consequences of not initiating prophylaxis could be fatal. A literature review identified 27 cases of donor-derived Strongyloides infection where the majority of donors had epidemiology risk factors; none of the recipients received prophylaxis and of 23 cases with known outcomes, nine recipients died.10 Although there are barriers for Strongyloides testing and treatment— including delayed diagnosis due to low index of suspicion; and misdiagnosis due to nonspecific presentation of symptoms, low sensitivity of stool microscopy, and limitations with serology testing specificity assurance—studies have shown a benefit for targeted testing and presumptive treatment of immunosuppressed individuals from endemic areas with ivermectin.1113

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the Los Angeles County Public Health Department, Ohio Department of Health, and Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to the investigation.

Abbreviations:

CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

DTAC

Disease Transmission Advisory Committee

IV

index value

OPO

organ procurement organization

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors of this manuscript declare no relevant conflict of interest or financial relationships to disclose. The findings and conclusions of this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

REFERENCES

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

RESOURCES