Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Nov 19;12(2):530–532.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.020

Pulmonary Infiltrates With Hypereosinophilia

Lauren Wetzler 1, Amy D Klion 1
PMCID: PMC10922332  NIHMSID: NIHMS1947921  PMID: 37984795

Abstract

Pulmonary infiltrates and hypereosinophilia have a wide range of causes. Here, we discuss the approach, diagnosis, and treatment of two cases with similar clinical presentations. Additional information, images, and discussion may be found in Table I and Supplemental Material (in this article’s Online Repository at www.jaci-inpractice.org).

CASE 1

A 59-year-old woman presented with a 2-month history of fatigue, productive cough, and dyspnea on exertion. She had grown up in India and emigrated to the United States in 1990 but had spent several months in India 1 year earlier to seek an evaluation for the symptoms. The examination was notable for expiratory wheezing and basilar crackles. Absolute eosinophil count (AEC) was 11,123/mL and the purified protein derivative skin test was negative. Chest radiography demonstrated an infiltrate in the superior segment of the right lower lobe. Bronchoscopy with biopsy revealed an interstitial inflammatory infiltrate with predominance of eosinophils and mast cells. Acidfast bacillus and fungal stains were negative. Antibiotics were ineffective. Although the patient responded dramatically to glucocorticoids with the resolution of symptoms and infiltrate and normalization of AEC, these recurred once corticosteroids were tapered.

CASE 2

A 64-year-old woman with a history of asthma and allergic rhinitis presented with fever and productive cough unresponsive to antibiotics. Born and raised in India, she had emigrated to the United States in 1985, traveling back periodically. The examination was significant for fever, diffuse wheezing, and decreased breath sounds. Laboratory results included AEC 7,434/mL, positive rheumatoid factor, and negative antifilarial antibody testing. The purified protein derivative skin test was negative. A chest radiograph demonstrated a left lower lobe pneumonia and effusion. A bronchoscopic biopsy showed a marked eosinophilic infiltrate without vasculitis. Cultures were negative. The symptoms and eosinophilia resolved with glucocorticoid therapy. Several years later, the patient presented acutely with chest pain, dyspnea, and severe pain in the distal extremities. Laboratory studies again showed marked eosinophilia (9,000/mL). Serum troponin was elevated, the electrocardiogram showed ST depression in leads V4 to V6, and computed tomography images of the chest demonstrated pleural and pericardial effusions. Cardiac catheterization was unremarkable. Serum antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were not detected.

DIAGNOSES

Case 1

Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Antifilarial antibody levels were markedly elevated. The patient was treated with a 2-week course of diethylcarbamazine with full resolution.

Case 2

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Repeat bronchoscopy with biopsy revealed necrotizing eosinophilic vasculitis. Remission was attained with high-dose glucocorticoids and maintained with low-dose daily prednisone.

DISCUSSION

Pulmonary infiltrates with hypereosinophilia can result from exposures (medications or radiation), hypersensitivities (allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis or hypersensitivity pneumonitis), infections (parasitic and other), malignancy, vasculitides, rare hypereosinophilic syndromes, and other idiopathic disorders.4 As demonstrated by the featured cases, the initial presentation and findings may be consistent with multiple etiologies. A thorough history, including a time line of symptoms, exposures, and medications, is essential. Obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and/or tissue is important both to confirm pulmonary eosinophilia and to identify an underlying cause such as vasculitis, infection, or malignancy. The patient’s response to empiric treatment (ie, antibiotics, glucocorticoids) may also be informative. The full compilation of findings must be analyzed and interpreted, because definitive diagnostic tests do not exist for many of the conditions in the differential.

Helminth infections are a relatively common cause of transient eosinophilic pulmonary infiltrates worldwide and are most often related to larval passage through the host lung (Loeffler syndrome).5 In contrast, tropical pulmonary eosinophilia is a rare syndrome that results from an inflammatory response to bloodborne microfilariae of Wuchereria bancrofti or Brugia species trapped in lung capillaries.13 Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia is most common in individuals from the Indian subcontinent and Brazil, especially in the setting of reexposure. Pulmonary symptoms, including cough, dyspnea, and wheeze, are often nocturnal. Imaging is nonspecific. Markedly elevated AEC (>3,000 cells/mL) and serum IgE levels are characteristic. Although microfilariae are rarely detectable in the blood (or lungs), antifilarial IgG levels are dramatically elevated. Glucocorticoids may provide transient benefit; however, definitive treatment with diethylcarbamazine is recommended for symptom relief and to prevent progression to interstitial lung disease.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is a rare multisystem disorder characterized by eosinophilia and vasculitis of small- to medium-sized vessels.6,7 Any organ can be involved, although pulmonary manifestations are most common. Preceding more acute clinical manifestations of vasculitis, patients classically, but not always, have a history of asthma (>90%) and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Testing for serum antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies is useful if results are positive, but they can be negative in up to 50% of people with biopsy-proven EGPA. Imaging is nonspecific and tissue is often necessary for a definitive diagnosis. Because rapid intervention can be lifesaving in severe disease, a consideration of EGPA in the differential diagnosis of eosinophilic pulmonary infiltrates, irrespective of patient demographics and exposures, is critical.

Supplementary Material

1

TABLE I.

Clinical findings in tropical pulmonary eosinophilia vs eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Feature Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia* Definite eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis

Endemic exposure Required Possible
Pulmonary symptoms Common
 Cough 92% (often nocturnal)
 Dyspnea 86%
 Wheeze 86%
Pulmonary infiltrates 76% (reticulonodular infiltrates are typical) Common
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive Not characteristic Detectable in 40% to 50%
Antifilarial antibodies 100% markedly elevated Not characteristic
Absolute eosinophil count Markedly elevated Moderate to markedly elevated
Serum IgE Markedly elevated Moderate to markedly elevated
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate Normal Elevated
Pulmonary function tests Mixed obstructive-restrictive pattern is most common Obstructive pattern early in disease; mixed obstructive-restrictive pattern with disease progression
Vasculitis Not characteristic Eosinophilic vasculitis is pathognomonic
Systemic manifestations Constitutional symptoms, including fever, fatigue, and weight loss can occur Multisystem involvement common and can be life-threatening; characteristic extrapulmonary symptoms include chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, mononeuritis multiplex, and myocarditis/ pericarditis
Response to corticosteroids Yes, but symptoms recur with taper Yes, but symptoms recur with taper
Response to diethylcarbamazine Yes No
*

Data are compiled from the three largest case series of patients with tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (total n = 37).13

Acknowledgments

Funded by the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Patients were seen on clinical protocols to study eosinophilia (NCT00001406) and filarial infections (NCT00001230) and signed informed consent for publication of the cases.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Boggild AK, Keystone JS, Kain KC. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: a case series in a setting of nonendemicity. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:1123–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsanglao WR, Nandan D, Chandelia S, Arya NK, Sharma A. Filarial tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: a condition masquerading asthma, a series of 12 cases. J Asthma 2019;56:791–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pinkston P, Vijayan VK, Nutman TB, Rom WN, O’Donnell KM, Cornelius MJ, et al. Acute tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Characterization of the lower respiratory tract inflammation and its response to therapy. J Clin Invest 1987;80: 216–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosenberg CE, Khoury P. Approach to eosinophilia presenting with pulmonary symptoms. Chest 2021;159:507–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Al-Tawfiq JA, Kim H, Memish ZA. Parasitic lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31:220093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Doubelt I, Cuthbertson D, Carette S, Chung SA, Forbess LJ, Khalidi NA, et al. Clinical manifestations and long-term outcomes of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in North America. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021;3:404–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.. Emmi G, Bettiol A, Gelain E, Bajema IM, Berti A, Burns S, et al. Evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023;19:378–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES