Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2023 Dec 3;84:102736. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102736

Integrative Approaches for Characterizing Protein Dynamics: NMR, CryoEM and Computer Simulations

Roman Zadorozhnyi 1,2, Angela M Gronenborn 2,3,*, Tatyana Polenova 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC10922663  NIHMSID: NIHMS1946571  PMID: 38048753

Abstract

Proteins are inherently dynamic and their internal motions are essential for biological function. Protein motions cover a broad range of timescales: 10−14–10 sec, spanning from sub-picosecond vibrational motions of atoms via microsecond loop conformational rearrangements to millisecond large amplitude domain reorientations. Observing protein dynamics over all timescales and connecting motions and structure to biological mechanisms requires integration of multiple experimental and computational techniques. This review reports on state-of-the-art approaches for assessing dynamics in biological systems using recent examples of virus assemblies, enzymes, and molecular machines. By integrating NMR spectroscopy in solution and the solid state, cryo electron microscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations, atomistic pictures of protein motions are obtained, not accessible from any single method in isolation. This information provides fundamental insights into protein behavior that can guide the development of future therapeutics.

Introduction

Proteins are the major components of the molecular machinery that keep cells and organisms alive, performing their tasks in a spatially and temporally organized fashion. Thus, their structures and dynamics have evolved to ensure optimal function [1,2]. Motions are a pivotal intrinsic property of proteins, exploited by nature to fine-tune their reactivities and interactions, when they perform their activities [3-5]. Alas, protein dynamics are generally ignored in the traditional representations of static average structures, despite their fundamental importance for understanding mechanisms and regulation of biological processes.

Protein motions span over 15 orders of magnitude in timescale, ranging from subpicoseconds to milliseconds or seconds [6]. Subpicosecond and picosecond dynamics are associated with vibrational motions of atoms, pico- to nanosecond motions are connected to side chain reorientations, while slower motions involve the collective movement of different parts of a protein, ranging from covalent bond isomerization (disulfides, cis-trans proline) to local or loop conformational changes to reorientation of domains [7]. Functionally relevant conformational rearrangements in proteins are often associated with changes in dynamics [8], both in frequencies and amplitudes. They can also occur in regions distal to the structural change by allosteric mechanisms [9,10].

Among the multitude of current methods for atomic-level structure determination, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray crystallography provide the spatial arrangements of atoms in a protein. The resulting protein structural models can be complemented by computationally assessing dynamics using large-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [11-13]. Dynamics can also be explored directly by NMR: timescales from pico- to milliseconds can be examined through relaxation measurements, lineshape analysis, and exchange experiments [14,15]. By contrast, in cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography, information on timescales of motions is absent, although data on conformational distributions present in the density maps are often interpreted as reflecting possible motions [16-18]. Timescales of motions accessible by MD simulations critically depend on the length of simulations [19] and usually do not exceed milliseconds for all-atom simulations on large systems [20-23]. Furthermore, many large-amplitude conformational changes are not accessible by MD simulations, and time-independent approaches, such as normal mode analysis, principal component analysis or time-structure independent component analysis, are necessary [24-26]. Gaining information about the entire range of biologically relevant timescales of protein motions requires integration of all possible experimental and computational techniques to visualize dynamics and connect motions to function.

In this review, we will highlight recent impactful studies of protein dynamics using an integrative approach encompassing NMR, cryo-EM and MD simulations, reporting on functionally significant motions in a number of complex biological systems, including enzymes and large molecular assemblies. Such integrative studies are still relatively rare, and in the second part of the review investigations integrating NMR and cryo-EM will be highlighted.

Integration of NMR, cryo-EM and MD simulations

Transcription factor II Human (TFIIH) is a multiprotein complex involved in regulation of transcription processes in the cells. Its core complex consists of seven subunits: XPB, XPD, p62, p52, p44, p34 and p8. Greber et al. determined the structure of the TFIIH core complex by cryo-EM [27,28]. However, the functionally important N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain (PH-D) of p62 (residues 1-103), involved in stabilizing the assembly and interacting with crucial components in the transcriptional pathway, was not observed. Therefore, the Nogales group hypothesized that it was disordered. In a recent study, Okuda et al. employed solution NMR to elucidate the structure and dynamics of the PH-D linked to the structured BTF-2-like transcription factor and synapse-associated DOS2-like proteins domain (BSD1) (residues 104-158) which was visible by cryo-EM [29]. The NMR study demonstrated that PH-D is not disordered, exhibiting the canonical fold of seven β-strands and an α-helix. In contrast, the linker was dynamic on the millisecond timescale and therefore mediated transient interactions of the PH-D with other domains as shown in Figure 1. Taking all the experimental results into account made it possible for the Nishimura group to generate a dynamic structural model, by integrating the previous cryo-EM studies by the Nogales group and their own NMR data, in an MD-based refinement highlighting interdomain linker motions as well as the overall dynamic behaviour and transient interactions of the PH domain with other TFIIH core complex subunits.

Figure 1. ∣. Structural model of human TFIIH with a superposition of 275 structural models of human the p62 PH domain.

Figure 1. ∣

Reproduced from [29].

Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) is an abundant nuclear protein involved in gene transcription and regulation, RNA metabolism and DNA repair [30]. Its low sequence complexity (LC) N-terminal domain (FUS-LC-N, residues 2-108) folds into a cross-β core and is responsible for FUS intracellular aggregation with amyloid-like fibrils formation [31], while the functionally important C-terminal domain (FUS-LC-C, residues 111-214) [32] appears to be disordered in full-length FUS-LC fibrils. In isolation, FUS-LC-C can form a two-fold symmetric fibril core, different from the one formed by full length FUS-LC, as was established in a recent study by the Tycko group integrating cryo-EM, magic angle spinning (MAS) NMR spectroscopy and MD simulations [33]. Only a fraction of residues of FUS-LC-C, namely residues 112-150 in three β-strands, were visible by cryo-EM. The overall sheet arrangement has lower curvature than that in FUS-LC and FUS-LC-N fibrils, explaining the difference in the core structure. Residues 150-214 are disordered, with several being dynamic on a sub-microsecond timescale, suggesting the presence of multiple subspecies, possibly relevant to full-length FUS-LC fibrils. The authors propose that in the full-length protein the FUS-LC-N cross-β core structure is more compact, energetically favorable, and folds faster.

The transient ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) is formed at the ribosome’s exit tunnel to assist in co-translational folding of a protein. A recent study of 70S E.coli ribosomes in complex with nascent chains (NC) of immunoglobulin-like filamin domain (FLN5) by Ahn et al. [34] investigated the role of large ribosomal subunit proteins uL22, uL23 and uL24 that possess loops protruding into the exit tunnel as shown in Figure 2. Using a combination of cryo-EM, NMR and MD simulations showed that truncation of the uL22 protein loops had no significant impact on FLN5 folding, suggesting that NCs are pointing into the vestibule region of the tunnel. NMR data revealed that the uL24 loop is more dynamic than the uL23 loop, with both loops enhancing the stability of the complex, compared to the loop-truncated constructs. Cryo-EM structures of the complex using 70S variants revealed electrostatic loop interactions with neighboring RNA. MD simulations based on the experimental NMR data led the authors to suggest a reduction in affinity of 70S devoid of the loops for the NC, influencing early folding events. The authors propose that the underlying dynamics in the ribosome create an interesting interplay: while the uL23 and uL24 loops only weakly interact with the newly synthesized protein, uL23 influences the motional modes of the NC and interferes with premature folding while uL24 guides its path through the energy landscape and permits productive folding of FLN5.

Figure 2. ∣. Ribosomal proteins at the exit tunnel.

Figure 2. ∣

Structure of the 70 S E. coli ribosome with the exit tunnel expansion. Reproduced from [34].

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) is the causative agent of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) that has globally claimed at least 40 million lives since 1981. HIV-1 capsid (CA) protein, a promising therapeutic target due to its key functional roles in the viral life cycle, forms a fullerene-like core of variable curvature assembled from ~250 CA hexamers and 12 pentamers [35]. Inherent pleomorphism renders mature capsid a challenging target for atomic-level structural characterization, although in-vitro CA assemblies of various morphologies recapitulate the salient capsid’s structural features and have been studied extensively by multiple groups [36-42].

Early studies of CA assemblies by solution and MAS NMR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM and all-atom MD simulations demonstrated that capsids are remarkably dynamic with motions occurring on nano- to millisecond timescales [37,43-46]. Recently a structure of CA tubular assemblies with dynamic details was determined, integrating MAS NMR, low-resolution cryo-EM and MD simulations, as shown in Figure 3 [42]. This study provided atomic-level dynamic and conformational information on the functionally important β-hairpin (residues 1-13), the Cyclophilin A (CypA) binding loop (residues 83-100), as well as the interhexamer dimer and trimer interfaces. Distinct conformational clusters and their relative populations were derived by integrating MAS NMR experiments and data-guided MD simulations with rigorous model-free statistical analysis.

Figure 3. ∣. HIV-1 CA protein assemblies dynamics.

Figure 3. ∣

with a) illustrating the molecular surface of a HIV-1 CA tube. The NTD and CTD are colored in purple and gray, respectively, and b) detailing MAS-NMR derived distances for dynamic parts of CA CypA loop (top) and β-hairpin (bottom). In c) representative structural clusters of the flexible linker region (top) and the cyclophilin A (CypA) binding loop (bottom) are provided. Reproduced with permission from [42].

Integration of NMR and cryo-EM

The caseinolytic protease proteolytic subunit (ClpP) is a serine protease necessary for cellular proteostasis. Several bacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, rely on this protease in their life cycle, rendering ClpP an attractive drug target for combatting drug resistance. M. tuberculosis possesses two enzymes, MtClpP1 and MtClpP2 that form homomultimeric MtClpP1P2 complexes, whose structures are ill understood. A recent study by the Kay group combining solution NMR and cryo-EM explored structure-dynamics-function relationship in apo MtClpP1P2 and its complex with the small molecule activator benzoyl-leucyl-leucine (Bz-LL) that is necessary for catalytic activity, as well as with cyclic acyldepsipeptidase (ADEP), that causes dysregulation of activity [47]. This study showed that the heptamers of MtClpP2 are more dynamic at the N-terminal β-hairpins, compared to MtClpP1, and that heptamers convert slowly into a tetradecameric MtClpP1P2 complex. ADEP binding rigidifies the N-terminal β-hairpins and, by quenching the dynamics, activates MtClpP2, while MtClpP1 remains catalytically inactive (Figure 4). MtClpP1’s activation requires Bz-LL, which rigidifies the heptamer and facilitates β-sheet formation at the inter-heptameric interface, thereby generating the active enzymatic catalytic site. While cryo-EM yielded major structural information and NMR provided both structural and dynamic details, the combination of both methods allowed to establish a comprehensive structure-dynamics-function relationships.

Figure 4. ∣. Dynamics associated with the caseinolytic protease.

Figure 4. ∣

The cryo-EM structure of apo MtClpP1P2 is shown on the left and the crystal structure of Bz-LL-bound MtClpP1P2 is shown on the right. Reproduced from [47].

Tailed bacteriophages possess icosahedral capsid heads that contain their double stranded DNA genome and tails of differing lengths, which attach to the surfaces of their bacterial hosts [48]. The tail of the SPP1 phage is long and flexible, formed by gp17.1. Monomers of gp17.1 self-polymerize into tubes permitting their characterization by cryo-EM and MAS NMR. A recent study by the Lange group [49] showed that this SPP1 tail-tube comprises an inner β-barrel that is rigid on the nano- to millisecond timescale, while loops in the hinge regions (residues 40-59) and the C-arm (residues 143-176) are dynamic, thereby allowing the tail to be flexible. A hybrid structure of the tail tube was obtained by integrating structural restraints from MAS NMR with medium-resolution cryo-EM density maps illustrating details inaccessible otherwise. Based on their observation, the authors proposed a simplified two-state model for tube binding.

Calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated proteins (CAMSAP)/Patronin comprise proteins associated with the microtubule (MT)-based cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells. The characteristic CKK domain of these proteins interacts with MTs, assisting with stabilization and growth. In a recent report, Atherton et al. combined a MAS NMR structural and dynamics study of CKK with a cryo-EM structure of MTs in the CKK/MT complex. The preferential binding of human CAMSAP1 CKK (HsCKK) to MTs minus end was observed and compared with Naegleria gruberi (NgCKK), which strongly interacts with the entire mammalian MT lattice [50]. HsCKK is rigid, and MTs accommodate HsCKK via small adjustments along the binding interface, thereby resulting in preferential minus end recognition. In contrast, NgCKK appears to be more dynamic and is less discriminate in its MT interaction. The authors propose that these distinct dynamics are associated with differences in binding affinity to tubulin subunits and MT, thereby resulting in the preferential binding of HsCKK to the minus end of MTs. In this case, both methods contribute unique information, as cryo-EM lacked atomic resolution and could not provide dynamics information for the protein, while NMR could not reveal the MTs binding site that is remodelled by HsCKK and the binding specificity.

Future outlook

With further advances in integrative structural approaches that also incorporate dynamics, we anticipate that in the upcoming years many more systems will become amenable to atomic-level studies, and such investigations will expand tremendously. Rapid advances in NMR instrumentation, including magnets operating at magnetic fields of 28.2 T [51], faster spinning probes [52] and CPMAS CryoProbes [53], high-field dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) instrumentation and new polarizing agents [54] will enable characterization of motions and conformational ensembles for a wide range of biological assemblies, including very large systems [55,56] as well as those that possess a large degree of disorder [57,58]. Specifically, ultrahigh magnetic fields will give access to enhanced resolution and sensitivity of NMR experiments allowing for characterization of larger structures as well as multiple conformations and minor species. Faster spinning NMR probes will bring better sensitivity with lower sample amounts and improved spectral resolution without the necessity for sample deuteration. CPMAS CryoProbes can boost sensitivity by the factor of 3 to 4 making experiments 10-15 times faster. For example, this technique made possible the study of the previously inaccessible conventional kinesin (KIF5B) motor domain complex with microtubules [59]. DNP is uniquely positioned to reveal atomic-level detail on systems, in which dynamic disorder interferes with room temperature MAS NMR, X-ray or cryo-EM measurements, by providing information on conformational distributions and minor conformers. Studying protein dynamics in native environments, such as cellular contexts, will likely become easier by NMR, with drug screening already available via in-cell NMR [60-62].

Integrating cryo-EM with MD simulations and deep learning approaches will also rapidly progress and will permit to maximize the information content [63,64]. The amount of generated data points can be reduced with AI-driven sampling, while the information extraction from every experiment, simulation or density map becomes faster and less involved with deep learning implementation based on pattern recognition. Already, single particle analysis of cryoEM maps allows for extraction of high-resolution snapshots along the continuous space of conformational dynamics [65] with time-resolved cryo-EM becoming an exciting new addition to the repertoire of methods to illuminate dynamics [66].

Thanks to the recent advances in computational hardware, MD simulations of very large systems are now possible [67], and timescales longer than microseconds will soon be accessible. Finally, the development of the adaptive force fields and user-friendly interfaces is hoped to make MD an easy-to-use integrative tool for all structural biologists [68,69]. Adaptive force fields will make MD simulations faster and less involved as nowadays even a small-molecule parametrization for MD calculations is a significant effort [70]; incorporation of non-canonical amino acids in simulations is another example of non-trivial modern task [71]. Adding broad MD simulation capabilities to a cloud-based web server, as it was done for example with docking [72], would have a tremendous impact on the field.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Grant 1U54AI170791).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

  • 1.Liu Y, Bahar I: Sequence evolution correlates with structural dynamics. Mol Biol Evol 2012, 29:2253–2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gilson AI, Marshall-Christensen A, Choi JM, Shakhnovich EI: The role of evolutionary selection in the dynamics of protein structure evolution. Biophys J 2017, 112:1350–1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Perutz MF: Stereochemistry of cooperative effects in haemoglobin. Nature 1970, 228:726–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ansari A, Berendzen J, Bowne SF, Frauenfelder H, Iben IE, Sauke TB, Shyamsunder E, Young RD: Protein states and proteinquakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985, 82:5000–5004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cooper A: Conformational fluctuation and change in biological macromolecules. Sci Prog 1980, 66:473–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Careri G, Fasella P, Gratton E, Jencks WP: Statistical time events in enzymes: a physical assessment. Crit Rev Biochem 1975, 3:141–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Henzler-Wildman KA, Lei M, Thai V, Kerns SJ, Karplus M, Kern D: A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature 2007, 450:913–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG: The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 1991, 254:1598–1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cooper A, Dryden DT: Allostery without conformational change. A plausible model. Eur Biophys J 1984, 11:103–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Perutz MF: Mechanisms of cooperativity and allosteric regulation in proteins. Q Rev Biophys 1989, 22:139–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Northrup SH, Pear MR, McCammon JA, Karplus M, Takano T: Internal mobility of ferrocytochrome c. Nature 1980, 287:659–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frauenfelder H, Petsko GA: Structural dynamics of liganded myoglobin. Biophys J 1980, 32:465–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McCammon J, Karplus M: Simulation of protein dynamics. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1980, 31:29–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krushelnitsky A, Reichert D: Solid-state NMR and protein dynamics. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2005, 47:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kempf JG, Loria JP: Protein dynamics from solution NMR. Cell Biochem Biophys 2002, 37:187–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Frauenfelder H, Petsko GA, Tsernoglou D: Temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction as a probe of protein structural dynamics. Nature 1979, 280:558–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Artymiuk PJ, Blake CCF, Grace DEP, Oatley SJ, Phillips DC, Sternberg MJE: Crystallographic studies of the dynamic properties of lysozyme. Nature 1979, 280:563–568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murata K, Wolf M: Cryo-electron microscopy for structural analysis of dynamic biological macromolecules. Biochimic Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2018, 1862:324–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Karplus M, McCammon JA: Protein structural fluctuations during a period of 100 ps. Nature 1979, 277:578–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Levitt M, Sander C, Stern PS: Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1985, 181:423–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Levitt M, Sharon R: Accurate simulation of protein dynamics in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:7557–7561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berendsen HJ, Hayward S: Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000, 10:165–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shaw DE, Adams PJ, Azaria A, Bank JA, Batson B, Bell A, Bergdorf M, Bhatt J, Butts JA, Correia T, et al. : Anton 3: twenty microseconds of molecular dynamics simulation before lunch. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, ACM; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Husic BE, Pande VS: Markov state models: from an art to a science. J Am Chem Soc 2018, 140:2386–2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bauer JA, Pavlović J, Bauerová-Hlinková V: Normal mode analysis as a routine part of a structural investigation. Molecules 2019, 24:3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.David CC, Jacobs DJ: Principal component analysis: a method for determining the essential dynamics of proteins. Methods Mol Biol 2014, 1084:193–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Greber BJ, Nguyen THD, Fang J, Afonine PV, Adams PD, Nogales E: The cryo-electron microscopy structure of human transcription factor IIH. Nature 2017, 549:414–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Greber BJ, Toso DB, Fang J, Nogales E: The complete structure of the human TFIIH core complex. eLife 2019, 8:e44771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. ••. Okuda M, Ekimoto T, Kurita J-i, Ikeguchi M, Nishimura Y: Structural and dynamical insights into the PH domain of p62 in human TFIIH. Nucleic Acids Res 2020, 49:2916–2930. Strucutre, dynamics, and interactions of PH-D domain in the TFIIH core complex are investigated by integrating solution NMR, cryo-EM and MD simulations.
  • 30.Chen C, Ding X, Akram N, Xue S, Luo S-Z: Fused in Sarcoma: properties, self-assembly and correlation with neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules 2019, 24:1622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Murray DT, Kato M, Lin Y, Thurber KR, Hung I, McKnight SL, Tycko R: Structure of FUS protein fibrils and its relevance to self-assembly and phase separation of low-complexity domains. Cell 2017, 171:615–627.e616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ozdilek BA, Thompson VF, Ahmed NS, White CI, Batey RT, Schwartz JC: Intrinsically disordered RGG/RG domains mediate degenerate specificity in RNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res 2017, 45:7984–7996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. ••. Lee M, Ghosh U, Thurber KR, Kato M, Tycko R: Molecular structure and interactions within amyloid-like fibrils formed by a low-complexity protein sequence from FUS. Nat Commun 2020, 11:5735. The isolated C-terminal domain FUS-LC-C, previously shown to be disordered in full-length FUS-LC, is found to fold into highly ordered fibrils with dynamically disordered C-terminal tail of FUS-LC-C using a combination of MAS NMR and cryo-EM data with MD simulations.
  • 34. ••. Ahn M, Włodarski T, Mitropoulou A, Chan SHS, Sidhu H, Plessa E, Becker TA, Budisa N, Waudby CA, Beckmann R, et al. : Modulating co-translational protein folding by rational design and ribosome engineering. Nat Commun 2022, 13:4243. Integrating solution NMR, cryo-EM and MD simulations, the interplay between dynamic loops of subunits comprising the ribosomal exit tunnel and the nascent chains is established to prevent premature folding and facilitate proper co-translational folding of a protein.
  • 35.Ganser BK, Li S, Klishko VY, Finch JT, Sundquist WI: Assembly and analysis of conical models for the HIV-1 core. Science 1999, 283:80–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perilla JR, Hadden-Perilla JA, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T: Integrative structural biology of HIV-1 capsid protein assemblies: combining experiment and computation. Curr Opin Virol 2021, 48:57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhao G, Perilla JR, Yufenyuy EL, Meng X, Chen B, Ning J, Ahn J, Gronenborn AM, Schulten K, Aiken C, et al. : Mature HIV-1 capsid structure by cryo-electron microscopy and all-atom molecular dynamics. Nature 2013, 497:643–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lu J-X, Bayro MJ, Tycko R: Major variations in HIV-1 capsid assembly morphologies involve minor variations in molecular structures of structurally ordered protein segments. J Biol Chem 2016, 291:13098–13112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dick RA, Zadrozny KK, Xu C, Schur FKM, Lyddon TD, Ricana CL, Wagner JM, Perilla JR, Ganser-Pornillos BK, Johnson MC, et al. : Inositol phosphates are assembly co-factors for HIV-1. Nature 2018, 560:509–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pornillos O, Ganser-Pornillos BK, Yeager M: Atomic-level modelling of the HIV capsid. Nature 2011, 469:424–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Han Y, Hou G, Suiter CL, Ahn J, Byeon IJ, Lipton AS, Burton S, Hung I, Gor'kov PL, Gan Z, et al. : Magic angle spinning NMR reveals sequence-dependent structural plasticity, dynamics, and the spacer peptide 1 conformation in HIV-1 capsid protein assemblies. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:17793–17803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. ••. Lu M, Russell RW, Bryer AJ, Quinn CM, Hou G, Zhang H, Schwieters CD, Perilla JR, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T: Atomic-resolution structure of HIV-1 capsid tubes by magic-angle spinning NMR. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2020, 27:863–869. Integrating MAS NMR data and cryo-EM with MD simulations, the authors derived an atomic resolution structure of HIV-1 CA tubular assemblies highlighting conformational and dynamic details of functionally important regions.
  • 43.Byeon I-JL, Hou G, Han Y, Suiter CL, Ahn J, Jung J, Byeon C-H, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T: Motions on the millisecond time scale and multiple conformations of HIV-1 capsid protein: implications for structural polymorphism of CA assemblies. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:6455–6466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Quinn CM, Wang M, Fritz MP, Runge B, Ahn J, Xu C, Perilla JR, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T: Dynamic regulation of HIV-1 capsid interaction with the restriction factor TRIM5α identified by magic-angle spinning NMR and molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018, 115:11519–11524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bayro MJ, Chen B, Yau WM, Tycko R: Site-specific structural variations accompanying tubular assembly of the HIV-1 capsid protein. J Mol Biol 2014, 426:1109–1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lu M, Hou G, Zhang H, Suiter CL, Ahn J, Byeon IJ, Perilla JR, Langmead CJ, Hung I, Gor'kov PL, et al. : Dynamic allostery governs cyclophilin A-HIV capsid interplay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015, 112:14617–14622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. •. Vahidi S, Ripstein ZA, Juravsky JB, Rennella E, Goldberg AL, Mittermaier AK, Rubinstein JL, Kay LE: An allosteric switch regulates Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1P2 protease function as established by cryo-EM and methyl-TROSY NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020, 117:5895–5906. The study reports on the structure and dynamics of MtClpP1P2 enzyme complex using a combination of solution NMR and cryo-EM, and reveals the mechanism of the enzyme catalytic function activation by small molecules Bz-LL and ADEP.
  • 48.Nobrega FL, Vlot M, de Jonge PA, Dreesens LL, Beaumont HJE, Lavigne R, Dutilh BE, Brouns SJJ: Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018, 16:760–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. •. Zinke M, Sachowsky KAA, Öster C, Zinn-Justin S, Ravelli R, Schröder GF, Habeck M, Lange A: Architecture of the flexible tail tube of bacteriophage SPP1. Nat Commun 2020, 11:5759. Integration of MAS NMR and cryo-EM in this study demonstrates that the SPP1 phage tail-tube is comprised of rigid inner β-barrel and dynamic regions that allow for global flexibility of the tube, leading to a two-state tube binding model.
  • 50. •. Atherton J, Luo Y, Xiang S, Yang C, Rai A, Jiang K, Stangier M, Vemu A, Cook AD, Wang S, et al. : Structural determinants of microtubule minus end preference in CAMSAP CKK domains. Nat Commun 2019, 10:5236. Characterization of CKK domain of CAMSAP/Patronin interactions with microtubules using a combination of MAS NMR and cryo-EM explains preferential binding of HsCKK to MTs minus end and impartial binding of NgCKK to MTs.
  • 51.Bettenhausen CA: Bruker installs world’s strongest NMR. Chem Eng News 2020, 98:12–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schledorn M, Malär AA, Torosyan A, Penzel S, Klose D, Oss A, Org ML, Wang S, Lecoq L, Cadalbert R, et al. : Protein NMR spectroscopy at 150 kHz magic-angle spinning continues to improve resolution and mass sensitivity. ChemBioChem 2020, 21:2540–2548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hassan A, Quinn CM, Struppe J, Sergeyev IV, Zhang C, Guo C, Runge B, Theint T, Dao HH, Jaroniec CP, et al. : Sensitivity boosts by the CPMAS CryoProbe for challenging biological assemblies. J Magn Reson 2020, 311:106680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jaudzems K, Polenova T, Pintacuda G, Oschkinat H, Lesage A: DNP NMR of biomolecular assemblies. J Struct Biol 2019, 206:90–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nimerovsky E, Movellan KT, Zhang XC, Forster MC, Najbauer E, Xue K, Dervişoǧlu R, Giller K, Griesinger C, Becker S, et al. : Proton detected solid-state NMR of membrane proteins at 28 Tesla (1.2 GHz) and 100 kHz magic-angle spinning. Biomolecules 2021, 11:752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Callon M, Malär AA, Pfister S, Římal V, Weber ME, Wiegand T, Zehnder J, Chávez M, Cadalbert R, Deb R, et al. : Biomolecular solid-state NMR spectroscopy at 1200 MHz: the gain in resolution. J Biomol NMR 2021, 75:255–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Siemer AB: Advances in studying protein disorder with solid-state NMR. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 2020, 106:101643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Schneider R, Blackledge M, Jensen MR: Elucidating binding mechanisms and dynamics of intrinsically disordered protein complexes using NMR spectroscopy. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2019, 54:10–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang C, Guo C, Russell RW, Quinn CM, Li M, Williams JC, Gronenborn AM, Polenova T: Magic-angle-spinning NMR structure of the kinesin-1 motor domain assembled with microtubules reveals the elusive neck linker orientation. Nat Commun 2022, 13:6795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Luchinat E, Barbieri L, Cremonini M, Nocentini A, Supuran CT, Banci L: Drug screening in human cells by NMR spectroscopy allows the early assessment of drug potency. Angew Chem Int Ed 2020, 59:6535–6539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Luchinat E, Barbieri L, Cremonini M, Banci L: Protein in-cell NMR spectroscopy at 1.2 GHz. J Biomol NMR 2021, 75:97–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Luchinat E, Banci L: In-cell NMR: from target structure and dynamics to drug screening. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2022, 74:102374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Casalino L, Dommer AC, Gaieb Z, Barros EP, Sztain T, Ahn S-H, Trifan A, Brace A, Bogetti AT, Clyde A, et al. : AI-driven multiscale simulations illuminate mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 spike dynamics. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 2021, 35:432–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Matsumoto S, Ishida S, Araki M, Kato T, Terayama K, Okuno Y: Extraction of protein dynamics information from cryo-EM maps using deep learning. Nat Mach Intell 2021, 3:153–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lyumkis D: Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. J Biol Chem 2019, 294:5181–5197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Maeots M-E, Enchev RI: Structural dynamics: review of time-resolved cryo-EM. Acta Crystallogr D 2022, 78:927–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hadden JA, Perilla JR: All-atom virus simulations. Curr Opin Virol 2018, 31:82–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sinha S, Tam B, Wang SM: Applications of molecular dynamics simulation in protein study. Membranes 2022, 12:844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hollingsworth SA, Dror RO: Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron 2018, 99:1129–1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sarkar S, Zadrozny KK, Zadorozhnyi R, Russell RW, Quinn CM, Kleinpeter A, Ablan S, Meshkin H, Perilla JR, Freed EO, et al. : Structural basis of HIV-1 maturation inhibitor binding and activity. Nat Commun 2023, 14:1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang DT, Gronenborn AM, Chong LT: Development and validation of fluorinated, aromatic amino acid parameters for use with the AMBER ff15ipq protein force field. J Phys Chem A 2022, 126:2286–2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.van Zundert GCP, Rodrigues J, Trellet M, Schmitz C, Kastritis PL, Karaca E, Melquiond ASJ, van Dijk M, de Vries SJ, Bonvin A: The HADDOCK2.2 web server: user-friendly integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. J Mol Biol 2016, 428:720–725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES