Summary
Organelle transporters define metabolic compartmentalization and how this metabolite transport process can be modulated is poorly explored. Here, we discovered that human SLC25A39, a mitochondrial transporter critical for mitochondrial glutathione uptake, is a short-lived protein under dual regulation at the protein level. Co-immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry and CRISPR KO in mammalian cells identified that mitochondrial m-AAA protease AFG3L2 is responsible for degrading SLC25A39 through the matrix loop 1. SLC25A39 senses mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster using four matrix cysteine residues and inhibits its degradation. SLC25A39 protein regulation is robust in developing and mature neurons. This dual transporter regulation, by protein quality control and metabolic sensing, allows modulating mitochondrial glutathione level in response to iron homeostasis, opening avenues for exploring regulation of metabolic compartmentalization. Neuronal SLC25A39 regulation connects mitochondrial protein quality control, glutathione and iron homeostasis, which were previously unrelated biochemical features in neurodegeneration.
Graphical Abstract

In Brief
Shi et al. identify a dual regulation of the putative mitochondrial glutathione transporter SLC25A39 by mitochondrial protease AFG3L2 and iron sensing, which enables an autoregulatory mechanism orchestrating glutathione and iron metabolism in mitochondria.
Introduction
Mitochondrial metabolite transporters1–3 define metabolic compartmentalization between mitochondria and rest of the cell4, and transport dysregulation is associated with many pathological conditions such as neurodegenerative disorders, metabolic syndromes and cancers. Despite the recent discoveries of protein identities that facilitate metabolite transport, the mechanism by which transporter proteins can be regulated remain unexplored.
Given the critical role of mitochondrial redox metabolism and oxidative stress5–8 in physiology, we focus on the regulation of mitochondrial transport for glutathione, the most abundant endogenous antioxidant. Glutathione9 critically supports redox signaling and biosynthesis of iron-sulfur (Fe-S) cluster cofactors inside the mitochondrial matrix10–12. Because glutathione is exclusively synthesized in the cytosol, how glutathione enters the mitochondrial matrix remained a decades-old mystery until the recent identification that a previously uncharacterized mitochondrial metabolite transporter, SLC25A39 (A39), is critical for mitochondrial glutathione transport13,14. A39 belongs to the SoLute Carrier 25 (SLC25) family, the largest transporter family that is responsible for translocating diverse metabolite ligands across the mitochondrial inner membrane1–3. Despite the relatively small mitochondrial volume, mitochondrial glutathione accounts for 10–15% of the total cellular glutathione pool10. We therefore hypothesize that a direct regulation of A39 could have a major impact on glutathione compartmentalization and cellular metabolism.
Results
SLC25A39 protein regulation depends on GSH and the matrix cysteine residues.
To explore the regulatory mechanism of A39, we performed amino acid sequence analysis13,15 and Alphafold structure prediction16 of A39. In addition to the typical structural fold of the SLC25 transporters, the threefold pseudo-symmetrical, six transmembrane α-helices surrounding the central transport cavity, the analysis revealed that A39 contains an extra mitochondrial matrix loop between transmembrane domain 1 and 2 with a low structural prediction confidence score (Fig. 1A). This loop 1 of amino acids 41–105 contains four matrix-exposed, thiol Cysteine (Cys) residues17,18 (Fig. 1A), which exceeds Cys frequency in proteins at around 1.7%19. C-terminal FLAG-tagged A39 construct with all four cysteine residues mutated to alanine, A394CA-FLAG, as well as A39WT-FLAG, can be expressed as a level similar to that of the endogenous A39 (Fig. 1B). A394CA-FLAG can fully restore mitochondrial GSH depletion in the A39 CRISPR KO cells similar to the wild type A39-FLAG (Fig. 1C), suggesting that the transporter activity is preserved in the A394CA mutant, while another cysteine mutant of the substrate binding site A39C334S-FLAG can only rescue partially (Fig. 1C). However, A394CA -FLAG completely abolished A39 protein upregulation upon pharmacological inhibition of glutathione biosynthesis using buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) (Fig. 1B), a regulation specific to A39 protein at the post-transcriptional level (Fig. S1A–C) that was previously reported with an unknown mechanism14.
Figure 1. SLC25A39 (A39) is a short-lived protein, and the degradation is regulated by GSH and the matrix cysteine residues.

(A) AlphaFold prediction of A39 structure revealed a unique cysteine-rich matrix loop 1.
(B) Western blot of endogenous A39 and ectopically expressed FLAG-tagged A39WT, substrate binding pocket mutant A39C334S, and matrix loop 1 four cysteine mutant A394CA in the K562 cells upon GSH depletion by BSO treatment (1mM, 2d). GAPDH, loading control.
(C) Mitochondrial GSH level assayed by HA-MITO tag immunoisolation followed by MS-based metabolite profiling in the control and clonal A39 CRISPR KO K562 cells expressing the indicated A39 constructs. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed t test. Significance level was indicated as *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
(D) Scatter plot showing the correlation of protein abundance (log10 nM) and mRNA abundance (Log10 TPM) for all coding genes expressed in the HEK293 cells (OpenCell, CZI). Blue dots, SLC25 transporter proteins. A39 and A40 are highlighted in red.
(E-F) Western blot showing A39-FLAG (E) and A394CA-FLAG (F) protein level in the clonal A39 CRISPR KO K562 cells treated with CHX (cycloheximide, 150 μg/ml) for the indicated times, either under basal condition (−BSO) or with BSO (1mM and with 2 d prior treatment). GAPDH, loading control. A39 band intensity was quantified and modeled using the non-linear fitting with one phase decay (A39, −BSO; A394CA, −BSO and +BSO) and plateau followed by one phase decay (A39, +BSO).
See also Figure S1.
SLC25A39 is a short-lived protein and degradation is regulated.
Because ectopically over-expressed recombinant A39-FLAG protein driven by the CMV promoter can only be expressed as a level similar to that of the endogenous A39 (Fig. 1B), we suspected that A39 protein might be tightly maintained at a low level under basal condition and is then alleviated upon GSH depletion by BSO. Indeed, we first identified that human A39 protein level is extremely low in comparison to the A39 mRNA level, which stands out as a proteome-wide outlier of protein-mRNA correlation in the HEK293T cells (CZI Open Cell20, Fig. 1D) — the majority of the mitochondrial SLC25 transporters exhibit correlated protein and mRNA ratios (Fig. 1D). Because all inner membrane SLC25 transporters are imported through a common TIM22 import mechanism, we suspected that A39 protein stability is regulated. We then performed cycloheximide (CHX) chase experiments and discovered that pre-synthesized A39 protein indeed exhibited a very short half-life < 2 h under basal condition (Fig. 1E). A394CA protein exhibited a similar short half-life (Fig. 1F). This half-life is drastically shorter than the majority of mitochondrial proteins21,22 of approximately median half-life at 87 h23. BSO significantly extended A39’s half-life (Fig. 1E), but failed to extend the short half-life of A394CA (Fig. 1F). This suggests that under basal condition, both pre-synthesized wild-type A39 and A394CA mutant were quickly degraded, and BSO treatment inhibited A39 degradation through a mechanism that depends on the matrix cysteines. These two regulatory mechanisms of A39, both fast degradation and BSO-mediated stabilization, are yet to be explored.
Mitochondrial m-AAA protease AFG3L2 is responsible for A39 degradation.
To characterize the quality control pathway that degrades A39, we combined co-immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (MS) and CRISPR KO in cells to identify its regulatory machinery. We first selected K562 clonal cells ectopically expressing relatively high level of A39-FLAG and a mitochondrial tag (HA-MITO, 3xHA-eGFP-OMP2524,25) from the clonal A39 CRISPR KO cells (Fig. 2A and S2A). We treated the cells with BSO for 2 days to increase the A39-FLAG protein level (Fig. S2A), rapidly immuno-isolated the mitochondria via HA-MITO using anti-HA magnetic beads, and then immunoprecipitated A39 binding partners using anti-FLAG resin in a mild 1% digitonin-containing lysates (Fig. 2A). Wild type K562 cell expressing HA-MITO tag was used as the control. Silver staining of the immunoprecipitants revealed an enrichment of A39-FLAG protein that migrated around 40 kD, confirmed by MS (Fig. 2A). One major band around 60 kD that is specific to A39-FLAG IP was identified as HSPD1/HSP60 by MS (Fig. 2A), an abundant mitochondrial matrix chaperonin that facilitates folding and refolding of matrix proteins26. HSPD1 enrichment suggested that the matrix portion of A39 protein may be flexible and misfolded, however, because HSPD1 CRISPR KO did not affect A39 protein level under basal condition (Fig. 2C), we did not follow up here. We then performed MS analysis of the entire gel lane from the A39-FLAG immunoprecipitants and control to identify specific A39 binding partners (Table S1). We categorized the hits into pathways relevant to mitochondrial quality control and A39-related metabolite sensing mechanisms that include mitochondrial proteases, matrix chaperones, mitophagy-related, and iron-related proteins (Fig. 2B). We then performed CRISPR to knock out 11 representative protein hits from these pathways to investigate the impact on A39 protein level, both under basal condition and BSO treatment (Fig. 2C). Strikingly, CRISPR KO of only two proteins dramatically stabilized A39 under basal condition, AFG3L2 and ABCB7 (Fig. 2C, red), among which AFG3L2 KO upregulated basal A39 protein level to a much higher level and A39 level in the AFG3L2 KO was no longer sensitive to BSO treatment (Fig. 2C). Western blot (Fig. S2B) and qPCR (Fig. S2C) confirmed successful depletion of AFG3L2 and ABCB7 in the corresponding CRISPR KOs. And mRNA level of the endogenous SLC25A39 did not change (Fig. S2D).
Figure 2. Co-immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry and CRISPR KO identify the mitochondrial m-AAA protease AFG3L2 in A39 degradation.

(A) Left, flow chart showing the experimental procedure to identify putative A39-interacting regulatory proteins. Right, silver stained SDS-PAGE of anti-FLAG immunoprecipitants from the control and A39-FLAG mitochondrial lysates. Wild type K562 cells expressing 3HA-eGFP-OMP25 (HA-MITO tag) were used as control. A39-FLAG protein identified by MS is labeled; *, a specific binding partner HSPD1 identified by MS.
(B) Categorization of specific A39-interacting protein hits into relevant quality control pathways. Protein level intensity based on top three peptides was shown in the control and A39-FLAG co-immunoprecipitants. Bold, hits that were followed up by CRISPR KO.
(C) Western blot of A39 from CRISPR KO K562 cells using sgRNAs targeting indicated A39-interacting proteins, and related mitochondrial proteases. Cells were analyzed under basal condition and BSO (200 μM) treatment for either 1 d or 2 d. Two CRISPR KO lines that increased basal A39 level were highlighted in red. GAPDH, loading control.
(D-E) Western blot of endogenous A39, ectopically expressed FLAG-tagged A39WT and A394CA in the AFG3L2 CRISPR KO cells (+ sgAFG3L2, D) and ABCB7 CRISPR KO cells (+sgABCB7, E).
(F) Western blot of endogenous A39 in HeLa cells upon AFG3L2 CRISPR KO and re-expressing AFG3L2–3xFLAG. GAPDH, loading control.
(G) Western blot of the endogenous A39 protein in the K562 cells treated with CHX (cycloheximide, 150 μg/ml) for the indicated times, with or without AFG3L2 CRISPR KO. GAPDH, loading control.
(H) A39 band intensity was quantified and modeled by the non-linear fitting with one phase decay.
AFG3L2 is the subunit of the mitochondrial m-AAA proteases in the inner membrane with catalytic sites facing the matrix27, and its mutations cause neurological disorders including dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA28)28 and Spastic ataxia 5, autosomal recessive (SPAX5)29. AFG3L2 CRISPR KO increased the basal level of endogenous A39, A39-FLAG and A394CA-FLAG (Fig. 2D), suggesting its role in the quality control of A39 (and A394CA) under basal condition. ABCB7 is a mitochondrial inner membrane protein and a putative transporter for certain Fe-S cluster species30. Because ABCB7 CRISPR KO only increased wild-type A39-FLAG but not A394CA-FLAG (Fig. 2E), we suspected that ABCB7 might function in the second branch of the regulation, the BSO-mediated A39 stabilization, that depends on the matrix cysteines.
The quality control regulation of A39 protein is specific to AFG3L2. Two hexametric m-AAA proteases exist in human, homo-oligomeric AFG3L2 complexes and hetero-oligomeric complexes of the homologous AFG3L2 and SPG731,32. Together with i-AAA protease active in the intermembrane space YME1L and other membrane-bound peptidases, they play a central role for inner membrane protein quality control. Notably, our co-immunoprecipitation MS did not recover SPG7 and YME1L, and CRISPR KO of SPG7 and YME1L did not affect A39 protein level (Fig. 2C), suggesting a specificity by AFG3L2.
CHX chase experiment identified that AFG3L2 CRISPR KO completely abolished A39 degradation beyond 8 hrs (Fig. 2G and H) -- a complete stabilization upon AFG3L2 loss is different from the moderate BSO-mediated stabilization (Fig. 1E). This suggests that A39 is a specific, short-lived substrate of AFG3L2, and other mitochondrial proteases cannot compensate and substitute for A39 proteolytic regulation. We validated these findings in HeLa cells, in which AFG3L2 CRISPR KO cells also upregulated A39 level that can be reduced by re-expressing AFG3L2–3xFLAG (Fig. 2F). We therefore concluded that AFG3L2 is necessary for degrading A39 under basal condition and this function cannot be substituted by other mitochondrial proteases.
A39 degradation is targeted through the matrix loop 1, which controls mitochondrial glutathione level.
We then tested whether the matrix loop 1 of A39 is responsible for A39 degradation by AFG3L2. We generated two A39 fusion constructs by swapping the long A39 loop 1 to the corresponding loop of either the homologous transporter SLC25A40 (A40), A39A40L1 -FLAG, or to that of the dicarboxylate SLC25 transporter SLC25A11 (A11), A39A11L1-FLAG (Fig 3A and B). As expected, due to the shorter sequences, A39A11L1-FLAG and A39A40L1-FLAG migrated at lower molecular weights than A39-FLAG (Fig. 3C). Importantly, A39A11L1-FLAG and A39A40L1-FLAG were expressed at a much higher level than A39-FLAG under basal condition (Fig. 3C), and AFG3L2 CRISPSR KO cannot further stabilize these two fusion proteins (Fig. 3C), suggesting they were resistant to degradation. A lack of AFG3L2-mediated degradation for the loop 1-swapping A39 fusion constructs strongly suggested that A39’s matrix loop 1 is responsible for AFG3L2 recognition and degradation.
Figure 3. A39 degradation is targeted through the matrix loop 1, which controls mitochondrial glutathione uptake and steady state level.

(A) Sequence alignment showing matrix loop 1 of A39, SLC25A40, and other representative SLC25 transporters SLC25A15, SLC25A1 and SLC25A11.
(B) Diagram showing Loop 1 swapping chimeric constructs.
(C) FLAG western blot for the indicated constructs in the clonal A39 CRISPR KO K562 cells, upon AFG3L2 CRISPR KO (+sgAFG3L2). GAPDH, loading control.
(D) Western blot of endogenous A39 in the whole cell lysates and mitochondrial lysates from the control and AFG3L2 CRISPR KO K562 cells. Mitochondrial protein VDAC, loading control.
(E) Mitochondrial GSH level assayed by HA-MITO tag immunoisolation followed by MS-based metabolite profiling in the control and AFG3L2 CRISPR KO K562 cells, normalized by total mitochondrial protein abundance.
(F) Western blot of A39 from BSO (1mM, 2 d)-treated clonal A39 CRISPR KO cells expressing either wild type A39 and A394CA-FLAG. VDAC, loading control.
(G) GSH uptake (1mM labeled GSH + 4mM unlabeled GSH, 15 min at room temperature) into HA-MITO immunoisolated mitochondria from BSO-treated clonal A39 CRISPR KO cells expressing either wild type A39 or A394CA-FLAG.
(H) Western blot of A39WT and A39A11L1-FLAG in the clonal A39 CRISPR KO cells.
(I) Mitochondrial GSH level assayed by HA-MITO tag immunoisolation followed by MS-based metabolite profiling in control, A39 CRISPR KO, and A39 CRISPR KO re-expressing A39WT, or A39A11L1-FLAG, normalized by NAD+ level.
(J) GSH uptake (5mM labeled GSH, 15 min at room temperature) into isolated mitochondria from A39 CRISPR KO cells expressing A39WT and A39A11L1-FLAG. All statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed t test. Significance level was indicated as *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
We then explored the functional consequence of A39 upregulation on mitochondrial glutathione level using three different experimental conditions. First, we performed mitochondrial metabolite profiling in the AFG3L2 CRISPR KO cells upon rapid mitochondrial immunoisolation using HA-MITO tag and discovered that the KO mitochondria lacking the protease had a higher A39 protein level as expected (Fig. 3D), and increased GSH level (Fig. 3E). Second, we immunoisolated mitochondria from BSO-treated A39 CRISPR KO cells expressing either A39-FLAG or A394CA-FLAG where only A39-FLAG can be upregulated but not A394CA-FLAG (Fig. 3F); and then performed in vitro mitochondria-based uptake assay using stable isotope labeled GSH [M+3] (GSH-[glycine-13C2, 15N]) for 15 min. The uptake assay revealed significantly higher GSH uptake in the A39-FLAG-expressing cells (Fig. 3G), despite A394CA-FLAG is a functional transporter (Fig. 1C). Third and specifically, we compared mitochondrial glutathione level in the A39 KO cells overexpressing A39-FLAG or A39A11L1-FLAG, in which A39A11L1-FLAG is expressed at a much higher level than A39-FLAG (Fig. 3H). Indeed, while A39-FLAG can rescue mitochondrial glutathione depletion in the A39 KO cells to the control level, A39A11L1-FLAG further increased mitochondrial GSH higher than that of the control level (Fig. 3I). Labeled GSH mitochondrial uptake assay from these cells also confirmed a high mitochondrial glutathione uptake rate (Fig. 3J). Therefore, we concluded that a regulated A39 transporter protein level directly controls mitochondrial matrix glutathione level.
SLC25A39 degradation is inhibited by a coordinated sensing of mitochondrial Fe-S cluster by the matrix cysteines.
What is the mechanism that stabilizes A39 protein during BSO treatment? We first tested and ruled out the possibility that BSO affects AFG3L2 activity, because BSO treatment did not affect level of NDUFA9 (Fig. 4A), whose degradation depends on AFG3L2 in the mammalian cells33. Because previous studies of A39 identified a coupling between A39 and mitochondrial iron homeostasis13,14,34,35, we hypothesized a BSO-mediated, A39’s matrix-cysteine-dependent metabolic sensing mechanism. Consistent with this notion, our CRISPR KO assay (Fig. 2C) already observed that CRISPR KO of the putative mitochondrial Fe-S cluster transporter ABCB7 stabilized A39 protein in a similar manner that depends on A39’s matrix cysteines (Fig. 2E). Following up on this, we deployed three strategies to perturb iron homeostasis to investigate the impact on A39 protein level (Fig. 4B). First, depleting cellular iron using an iron chelator deferoxamine (DFO), which is sensed by increased cytosolic iron-sensing IRP2 level (Fig. S3A and S3B), diminished BSO-mediated A39 protein upregulation (Fig. 4C and S3B). Second, depleting mitochondrial iron by double CRISPR KO of the two mitochondrial iron transporters, SLC25A28 and SLC25A37 (Fig. S3C and S3D), completely abolished BSO-mediated A39 protein upregulation (Fig. 4D). Third, inhibiting Fe-S cluster biosynthesis chaperone by CRISPR KO of HSCB or GLRX5 (Fig. S3E and S3F) significantly dampened BSO-mediated A39 protein upregulation (Fig. 4E). Then, to investigate the contribution of individual matrix cysteines in A39, we generated four FLAG-tagged single cysteine mutants, A39C74A, A39C78A, A38C88A and A39C94A. While all four mutants can be expressed similar to the wild-type level under basal condition, all four mutants exhibited reduced stabilization upon BSO treatment (Fig. S3G), suggesting a coordinated regulation through all four cysteines.
Figure 4. A39 is stabilized through a coordinated sensing of mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster by the matrix cysteines. A39 regulation occurs in neurons.

(A) Western blot of A39 showing BSO treatment (1mM, 2d) increased A39 in the control K562 cells but did not affect NDUFA9 level, while the basal level of A39 and NDUFA9 were increased in the AFG3L2 CRISPR KO K562 cells.
(B) Diagram of iron manipulation strategies.
(C) Western blot of A39 in K562 cells treated with either or a combination of BSO (1mM, 2d) and DFO (20 μM, 2d).
(D) Western blot of A39 with and without BSO (1mM, 2d) in the CRISPR KO K562 cells of either or both mitochondrial iron transporters SLC25A28 and SLC25A37.
(E) Western blot of A39 upon BSO (1mM) treatment for 1 and 2d in the CRISPR KO K562 cells of HSCB or GLRX5.
(F) Diagram of A39 cysteine labeling and mobility shift assay. Cells were treated with either or a combination of BSO (100 μM, 2d) and DFO (deferoxamine, 20 μM, 2d).
(G) Anti-FLAG western blot and mobility shift assay for A39-FLAG in the indicated conditions, without or with cysteine labeling.
(H) Diagram of neuronal differentiation from the iPSC line, KOLF2.1J cells expressing dox-inducible NGN2 in the safe locus.
(I) Western blot of A39, HSCB, AFG3L2, and Synaptophysin, a synaptic marker from the indicated days (H) during neuronal differentiation. GAPDH, loading control.
(J) Western blot of A39 in the mature iNeurons (differentiation Day 21) upon 1 mM BSO treatment for 3 and 7 d. GAPDH, loading control.
(K) Western blot of A39 and IRP2 in the mature iNeurons (differentiation Day 21), treated with either or a combination of BSO (1mM, 7d) and DFO (20 μM, 7d). GAPDH, loading control.
(L) A39 regulation model.
See also Figure S3.
To assay whether the four matrix cysteines might be directly involved in iron sensing, we applied reactive cysteine labeling reagent, iodoacetyl-PEG2-biotin (MW = 542 Da), to label cysteine residues of A39WT-FLAG in the A39 and AFG3L2 double KO K562 cell mitochondrial lysates, and assayed iron-dependent labeling efficiency through A39-FLAG mobility shift (Fig. 4F). Because A39 protein contains three additional cysteine residues besides the four matrix cysteines, we observed a modest mobility shift of the labeled A39-FLAG from the BSO-treated condition, corresponding to a partial labeling (Fig. 4G, black asterisk). Importantly, cellular iron depletion by either DFO or BSO + DFO treatment allowed A39-FLAG to be maximally labeled and to migrate at a higher molecular weight (Fig. 4G, cyan asterisk), suggesting more cysteine residues of A39 became exposed upon iron depletion and reactive to labeling. The mobility shift reflects cysteine labeling, because A39-FLAG from mitochondrial lysates without labeling reaction migrated at the similar molecular weight (Fig. 4G, red asterisk) and the protein abundances were comparable due to AFG3L2 KO. We therefore concluded that A39’s four matrix cysteines are responsible for coordinated sensing of matrix iron homeostasis, protecting A39 from degradation.
A39 regulation in the neuronal cells.
Mutations in AFG3L2 are known to cause neurological disorders28,29,36 and A39 is a candidate risk gene for late onset Parkinson’s disease37. In addition, as glutathione, iron, and mitochondrial dysregulation have all been implicated in neurological disorders, we then explored if this A39 protein regulation mechanism also occurs in the neuronal cells. We chose the human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) KOLF2.1J cell-derived glutamatergic neurons utilizing Tet-On doxycycline (Dox)-inducible NGN2 expression (Fig. 4H)38–40. The neuronal differentiation was robust (>95%) based on neuronal morphology and they were considered mature iNeurons on differentiation Day 21 (Fig. S3H). Western blotting for synaptic marker Synaptophysin confirmed synaptic development (Fig. 4I). We observed a time-dependent reduction of A39 protein level during neuronal differentiation (Fig. 4I), which is accompanied by a decline of the Fe-S cluster machinery HSCB (Fig. 4I), suggesting a coordinated regulation of mitochondrial glutathione and Fe-S cluster during differentiation. The AFG3L2 protein level remained unchanged (Fig. 4I). A39 reduction in neurons is likely due to reduced iron sensing that activates degradation, because BSO treatment in the mature iNeurons dramatically upregulated A39 protein level (Fig. 4J and 4K), which can be dampened by DFO treatment (Fig. 4K). The occurrence of A39 regulation in the neuronal cells might suggest a regulated neuronal glutathione compartmentalization in the context of brain disorders.
Discussion
Here, we reported a dual regulatory mechanism acting on a mitochondrial transporter protein, by both protein quality control and metabolic sensing, which directly controls mitochondrial glutathione uptake in response to iron homeostasis (Fig. 4L), a finding independently reported by Liu et al.41. The proteolytic regulation of A39 is specific to the mitochondrial m-AAA protease AFG3L2, and cannot be substituted by other mitochondrial proteases that also act around the inner mitochondrial membrane42,43. A direct sensing of mitochondrial iron homeostasis inhibits A39 degradation, further enabling a specific transporter regulation and coordinated metabolism of two essential and reactive redox metabolites, glutathione and iron. We further went on to reveal this A39 regulation in the developing and mature neurons. This unexpected link between mitochondrial glutathione and m-AAA protease AFG3L2 might lead to unexplored pathophysiological mechanisms under a diverse clinical spectrum of AFG3L2 mutation-associated neurodegenerative disorders that range from ataxia to parkinsonism28,36. This dual regulatory mechanism of SLC25A39 transporter, by AFG3L2 and iron, further advances our understandings of metabolic regulation through protein quality control and metabolite sensing, opening new avenues for exploring regulation of metabolic compartmentalization in cellular metabolism.
Limitations of the Study
We reported a dual protein regulation of SLC25A39 by the mitochondrial protease AFG3L2 and iron sensing, however, the exact mechanisms how SLC25A39 is targeted for degradation and how iron sensing inhibits this degradation are yet to be explored. And whether SLC25A39 regulation by AFG3L2 might be involved in pathology of AFG3L2-mutation associated neurological disorders needs to be investigated.
STAR Methods
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Hongying Shen ( hongying.shen@yale.edu)
Materials availability
All reagents generated in this study are available from the lead contact without restriction.
Data and code availability
The raw data for the proteomics have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD047327 and is publicly available as of the date of publication.
This paper does not report original codes.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS
Cell cultures
K562 cells (ATCC, CCL-243), HeLa-M cells (a subclone of HeLa, ATCC, CCL-2 from P. De Camilli laboratory), and HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL-3216) were maintained in DMEM (Thermo Fisher, 11995) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma, F2442) and 100 U /ml Pen/Strep (Thermo Fisher, 15140122).
For human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived neuronal experiments, we used an established human KOLF 2.1J iPSCs (Jackson Laboratory, JIPSC1000)40 engineered to harbor a doxycycline-inducible NGN2 transgene expressed at the AAVS1 safe harbor locus38,39,44. Cell maintenance and differentiation is following the previous literature39. For maintenance, the iPSCs were seeded at a density of 0.3 M per well in a 6 well Geltrex coated plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A1413302) supplemented with 10 μM ROCK inhibitor (Selleck Chemicals, S1049) in E8 Flex medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A2858501). The media was replaced with fresh E8 Flex Medium without ROCK inhibitor within 24 hours and the cells were passaged every 2–3 days at 70–80% confluency with StemPro Accutase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A1110501). To generate excitatory neurons (iNeurons), hiPSCs were induced by DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 11320033) containing 2 mg/ml of doxycycline (Sigma, D9891) for 2 days. These cells were then incubated with StemPro Accutase for 5 min, quenched with DMEM/F12 medium, and counted. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 300 g at room temperature for 5 min and the cell pellet was gently resuspended in 2 ml iNeuron medium prepared with the following reagents: BrainPhys medium (StemCell Technologies, 5790), B27 supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 17504044), NT-3 (Peprotech, 450–03), BDNF (Peprotech, 450–02), laminin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 23017015), and 2 mg/ml doxycycline. The induced cells were then seeded at a density of 2 M per well on a PLO-borate (Millipore Sigma, P3655; Thermo Fisher Scientific, 28341) and Geltrex-coated 6-well plate. The following day, 1 ml of iNeuron medium was added to the medium and a half medium change was performed every 2–3 days until respective time points required for the time course assays (Day 7, Day 14, and Day 21).
All the cells were tested for mycoplasma quarterly using Universal Mycoplasma Detection kit (ATCC, 30–1012K).
METHOD DETAILS
Plasmids and cloning
For single KO cells, the following sgRNAs were synthesized and cloned into the lentiCRISPR v2 vector (Addgene, 52961), and the resulting plasmids were used to generate the knockout lines. sgRNA sequences used for targeted integration can be found in Table S2. For the DKO cells, spCas9 guides were synthesized and cloned into either lentiCRISPR v2 vector (puromycin selection) and pXPR_BRD051 (hygromycin selection) vector, and the resulting plasmids were used to generate the single knockout (puromycin selection) and the double knockout (a combination of puromycin and hygromycin selection) lines. For the study of SLC25A39, Lentiviral plasmids were used to ectopically express human SLC25A39WT, SLC25A39C334S, SLC25A394CA, SLC25A39C74A, SLC25A39C78A SLC25A39C88A, SLC25A39C94A, SLC25A39A11L1 and SLC25A39A40L1 proteins with a C-terminal FLAG tag following a flexible linker. A lentiviral plasmid for the human SLC25A39WT with a C-terminal FLAG tag without the linker was used in the Fig. S2A. To study AFG3L2, the lentiviral vector was used to express AFG3L2 with a C-terminal 3xFLAG tag. For rapid mitochondrial isolation experiments, the following plasmid was used: pMXs-3xHA-EGFP-OMP25 (Addgene, 83356).
Lentivirus production and transduction for cell line generation
Lentivirus was produced using HEK 293T cells. Specifically, 0.5 × 106 HEK293T cells were plated in a 6 cm dish one day before induction. A mixture of 0.6 μg pMD2.G (Addgene, 12259), 0.9 μg psPAX2 (Addgene, 12260), and 1 μg lentiviral plasmids was mixed with 125 μl serum-free DMEM and 5 μl of Lipofectamine P3000 reagent (Invitrogen, 100022057). The mixture was then combined with 2.5 μl of Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Invitrogen, 100022050) and 125 μl serum-free DMEM, and incubated for 15–30 min at room temperature before adding dropwise to the cells. Two days after induction, the spent media was collected and filtered through a 0.45 μm sterile filter, and the resulting virus was stored at −80 °C until use. For infection, 0.5×106 cells were plated in 24-well plate in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 10 μg/ml polybrene, and 250–300 μl of virus-containing media. Spin infection was performed at 2000 g for 60 min at 37 °C. After overnight incubation, the infected cells were transferred to a 10 cm dish containing the fresh media supplemented with the corresponding antibiotic.
To generate the DKOs and corresponding controls, cells were first infected with plasmids bearing a hygromycin selection cassette, followed by selection with 0.25 mg/ml hygromycin (Roche, 10843555001) for one week. After, the cells were infected again with plasmids bearing a puromycin selection cassette followed by 2 μg/ml puromycin (Gibco, A1113803) selection for two days. Two cutting controls were used for the growth fitness defects caused by double-strand DNA breaks during the Cas9 cutting. For SLC25A39 and AFG3L2 double KO expressing various FLAG-tagged SLC25 fusion proteins, sgRNA targeting SLC25A39 cloned in the pLentiCRISPR V2-blast was used followed by 10 μg/ml blasticidin (Alfa Aesar, J61883.FPL) selection for 6 days clonal selection.
qPCR for mRNA level
The mRNAs were isolated from 0.5 million cells using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, 74104); the cDNA was prepared using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix for qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, 11752050). The qPCR experiments were performed on the QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR Systems using the recommended TaqMan probes (See Key Resources Table).
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Antibodies | ||
| Rabbit Anti-SLC25A39 | Proteintech | Cat#14963-1-AP |
| Rabbit Anti-VDAC | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#4661T |
| Mouse Anti-GAPDH | Invitrogen | Cat#39-8600 |
| Mouse Anti-SLC25A40 | Abcam | Cat#ab69075 |
| Rabbit Anti-AFG3L2 | Proteintech | Cat#14631-1-AP |
| Mouse Anti-FLAG | GenScript | Cat#A00187 |
| Mouse Anti-NDUFA9 | Invitrogen | Cat#459100 |
| Rabbit Anti-HSCB | Proteintech | Cat#15132-1-AP |
| Rabbit Anti-Synaptophysin 1 | Synaptic Systems | Cat#101002 |
| Rabbit Anti-IRP2 | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat#37135S |
| Rabbit Anti-SLC25A37(Mitoferrin1) | Proteintech | Cat#26469-1-AP |
| Rabbit Anti-GLRX5 | Sigma | Cat#HPA042465 |
| Rabbit-Anti-ABCB7 | Proteintech | Cat#11158-1-AP |
| Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP | Invitrogen | Cat#PI31460 |
| Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP | Invitrogen | Cat#PI31430 |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| L-Butathione Sulfoximine | Sigma | Cat#B2515 |
| Cycloheximide | Sigma | Cat#C4859 |
| Deferoxamine mesylate salt | Sigma | Cat#D9533 |
| GSH-[glycine-13C2, 15N] | Sigma | Cat#683620 |
| EZ-link Iodoacetyl-PEG2-Biotin | Thermo Scientific | Cat#21334 |
| DYKDDDDK Peptide | GenScript | Cat#RP10586 |
| Hygromycin B | Roche | Cat#10843555001 |
| Puromycin Dihydrochloride | Gibco | Cat#A1113803 |
| Blasticidin S hydrochloride | Alfa Aesar | Cat#J61883.FPL |
| Digitonin (5%) | Invitrogen | Cat#BN2006 |
| Doxycycline | Sigma | Cat#D9891 |
| Critical commercial assays | ||
| Pierce BCA protein assay kit | Thermo Scientific | Cat#23225 |
| Silver Stain Plus Kit | Bio-Rad | Cat#1610449 |
| Superscript™ III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix for qRT-PCR | Invitrogen | Cat#11752050 |
| Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection kit | Invitrogen | Cat#L3000008 |
| RNeasy Mini kit | Qiagen | Cat#74104 |
| Universal Mycoplasma Detection kit | ATCC | Cat#30-1012K |
| Deposited data | ||
| The raw data for the proteomics have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository. | This paper | PXD047327 |
| Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
| K562 cells | ATCC | CCL-243 |
| HeLa | Pietro De Camilli lab | ATCC-CCL-2 |
| HEK293T | ATCC | CRL-3216 |
| Human iPSC KOLF 2.1J line | Jackson Laboratories | JIPSC1000 |
| Oligonucleotides | ||
| spCas9 sgRNA guide sequences to generate the CRISPR KO cells | This paper | Table S2 |
| Recombinant DNA | ||
| lentiCRISPR v2 vector | Addgene | Cat#52961 |
| lentiCRISPR v2 - hygro | Broad institute | pXPR_BRD051 |
| lentiCRISPR v2 - Blast | Addgene | Cat#83480 |
| pMXs-3xHA-EGFP-OMP25 | Addgene | Cat#83356 |
| psPAX2 | Addgene | Cat#12260 |
| pMD2.G | Addgene | Cat#12259 |
| SLC25A39-FLAG (linker) - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39FLAG (no linker) - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A394CA-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39C334S-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39A11L1-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39A40L1-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39C74A-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39C78A-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39C88A-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| SLC25A39C94A-FLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| AFG3L2-3xFLAG - hygro resistance | This paper | N/A |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| GraphPad Prism 10.1.1 | GraphPad Software | N/A |
| Xcalibur 4.1 | Thermo Scientific | N/A |
| StepOne Software version 2.1 | Applied Biosystems | N/A |
| FIJI (ImageJ2) | https://imagej.net/software/fiji/ | N/A |
| Proteome Discoverer version 2.5 | Thermo Scientific | N/A |
| Other | ||
| human SLC25A28 TaqMan probe | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#4331182/Hs00945863_m1 |
| human SLC25A39 TaqMan probe | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#4331182/Hs00924971_g1 |
| human ABCB7 TaqMan probe | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#4331182/Hs00188776_m1 |
| human AFG3L2 TaqMan probe | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat#4351372/Hs01064997_m1 |
Immunoblotting
For the western blotting experiments, samples were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, J60645.AK) supplemented with 1% SDS and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 11836170001). SDS-PAGE was performed using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen, NP0335BOX) and the blot was visualized for labeling by chemiluminescent on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP imaging system. The protein content was measured using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, 23225) for sample normalization. The following antibodies and concentration were used: Anti-SLC25A39 (Proteintech, 14963–1-AP, 1:300); Anti-VDAC (Cell Signaling Technology, 4661T, 1:1000); Anti-GAPDH (Invitrogen, 39–8600, 1:1000); Anti-SLC25A40 (Abcam, ab69075, 1:1000); Anti-AFG3L2 (Proteintech, 14631–1-AP, 1:1000); Anti-FLAG (GenScript, A00187, 1:1000); Anti-NDUFA9 (Invitrogen, 459100, 1:1000); Anti-HSCB (Proteintech, 15132–1-AP, 1:1000); Anti-GLRX5 (Sigma, HPA042465, 1:500); Anti-Synaptophysin 1 (Synaptic Systems,101002, 1:1000); Anti-IRP2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 37135S, 1:500); Anti-SLC25A37(Mitoferrin1) (Proteintech, 26469–1-AP, 1:1000); Anti-ABCB7 (Proteintech, 11158–1-AP, 1:1000); Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP (Invitrogen, PI31460, 1:5000 ); and Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) Secondary Antibody, HRP ((Invitrogen, PI31430, 1:5000 ).
Protein degradation assay
The cells were pretreated as described in figure legends. For each sample, 2 M cells were incubated with 150 μg/ml CHX (cycloheximide, Sigma, C4859) in a six-well plate, which was collected at the indicated times. For degradation assay in BSO, cells were pre-treated with 1 mM BSO for 2d, and incubated with CHX together with 1mM BSO for the indicated times. Western blot was used to quantify the A39 protein level. The intensity of the A39 protein was measured and analyzed using Fiji45.
Co-immunoprecipitation from the mitochondrial lysates
BSO-treated clonal SLC25A39 KO K562 cells expressing SLC25A39-FLAG and 3xHA-EGFP-OMP25 was selected. 150 million cells were washed with PBS and collected at 1,000 g for 2 min at 4 °C, suspended in 3 ml KPBS buffer (136 mM KCl, 10 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.25) containing protease inhibitor cocktail to yield a homogenous single cell suspension, and aliquots were individually lysed by 20 gentle strokes using hand-held Dounce tissue grinder with tight-fitting pestle B (VMR, Kontes). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 2 min at 4 °C, and transferred to new EP tubes containing 300 μl pre-washed anti-HA magnetic beads (Pierce, 88837). After an end-to-end rotator incubation for 5 min in the cold room, the isolated mitochondria were washed with KPBS buffer for 3 times, and lysed with 600 μl of TBS buffer (pH=7.5) containing 0.5% digitonin (w/v) in wet ice for 15 min. The lysate was transferred to a new 1.5 ml tube and spun at 10,000 g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml EP tube containing 70 μl pre-washed anti-FLAG resin (GenScript, L00432). After an end-to-end rotator incubation for 40 min at room temperature, the resins were washed with 0.04% digitonin (w/v) TBS buffer three times. A39-FLAG protein was eluted from the FLAG resin with 60 μl of TBS buffer containing 300μg/ml FLAG peptide (GenScript, RP10586) after a 20-min incubation at room temperature with pipetting, and collected by centrifugation using spin cups (Thermo Scientific, 69702) at 2,000 g for 2 min at 4 °C.
Silver staining
The sliver staining is following the product protocol in a glass container. The gel was immediately fixed using 40% methanol/10% acetic acid (v/v) for 60 min. Then the gel was transferred to a solution containing 10% ethanol/5% acetic acid (v/v) for 30 min, immersed in a 1x oxidizer (Bio-Rad, 1610444) for 10 min, washed using deionized water several times (10 min each) until all the yellow color was removed from the gel, and stained by the silver reagent (Bio-Rad, 1610445) for 30 min. After that, the gel was quickly washed using deionized water to remove excess silver reagent. Lastly, the developer solution (Bio-Rad, 1610450) was used to develop the gel several times until the protein bands became clearly visible. To stop the staining process, 5% acetic acid (v/v) was used.
Sequence analysis and structural modeling
Primary amino acid sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (MUltiple Sequence Comparison by Log-Expectation). A structure model of human SLC25A39 was generated using the AlphaFold16,46.
Mitochondrial isolation and uptake assay
A rapid mitochondria immunoisolation method was following the protocols24,25. Approximately 30 million cell lines expressing mito IP constructs were washed with PBS, collected at 1,000 g for 2 min at 4 °C, suspended in 1 ml KPBS buffer (136 mM KCl, 10 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.25) to form homogenous single-cell suspension, and lysed by 20 gentle strokes in a 2 ml hand-held Dounce tissue grinder with tight-fitting pestle B (VMR, Kontes). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 2 min at 4 °C, and transferred to a new 1.5 ml EP tube containing 80 μl pre-washed anti-HA magnetic beads (Pierce, 88837). After an end-to-end rotator incubation for 3.5 min in the cold room, the isolated mitochondria were washed with KPBS buffer for 3 times. For the metabolite profiling experiment, mitochondrial metabolites were extracted with 50 μl acetonitrile-methanol-water (27:9:1 v/v/v). For the western blotting experiment, mitochondrial proteins were lysed with 100 μl RIPA lysis buffer containing 1% SDS and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 11836170001).
For the mitochondrial uptake assay, the isolated mitochondria on beads were incubated with 5 mM labeled GSH, GSH-[glycine-13C2, 15N] (Sigma, 683620), in 100 μl assay buffer (110 mM sucrose, 20 mM HEPES pH7.4, 10 mM KH2PO4, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1% BSA). The uptake assay was performed at room temperature by horizontal shaking at 170 rpm and manually mixed one time. At the indicated time point, the incubated mitochondrion was washed three times with KPBS buffer, and metabolites were extracted with 50 μl acetonitrile-methanol-water (27:9:1 v/v/v) for immediate LC-MS analysis.
Mass spectrometry for mitochondrial GSH level
LC/MS-based analyses were performed on a Q Exactive plus benchtop orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with an Ion Max source and a HESI II probe, which was coupled to a Vanquish UHPLC system. The polar metabolites from mitochondria were analyzed on a SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC polymeric 5 μm, 150×2.1 mm column (EMD-Millipore 150460). Mobile phase A was consisted of 20 mM ammonium carbonate in water at pH 9.6 (adjusted with ammonium hydroxide), and mobile phase B consisted of 100% acetonitrile. The column temperature was held at 27 °C with the injection volume of 5 μl, and an autosampler temperature of 4 °C. The LC conditions were set as following: the flow rate was 0.15 ml/min with a gradient of 80% B at 0 min, 80% B at 0.5 min, 20% B at 20.5 min, 20% B at 21.3 min, 80% B at 21.5 min and till 29 min. The mass data were acquired in the polarity switching mode with full scan mode in a range of 70–1000 m/z, with the resolution at 70,000, the AGC target at 1e6, the maximum injection time at 80 ms, the sheath gas flow at 50 units, the auxiliary gas flow at 10 units, the sweep gas flow at 2 units, the spray voltage at 2.5 kV, the capillary temperature at 310°C, and the auxiliary gas heater temperature at 370°C. Xcalibur 4.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to pick peaks and integrate peak intensity.
Mass spectrometry for SLC25A39-FLAG immunoprecipitants
The co-immunoprecitants were loaded in a SDS-PAGE gel and run for a short time to remove the elution buffer composition. Cut gel slices were further cut into small pieces, fixed with 1 ml of methanol-water-acetic acid (45:45:10 v/v/v) for 15 min on a tilt-table, and then washed three times with 1 ml water for 5 min. The bands were washed with 1 ml 100 mM NH4HCO3 (ammonium bicarbonate, ABC) 50% acetonitrile (ACN) for 20 min, then reduced by the addition of 175 μl 4.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 100 mM ABC and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The DTT solution was removed, and the samples were cooled to room temperature. The samples were alkylated by the addition of 175 μl 10 mM iodoacetamide (IAN) in 100 mM ABC and incubation at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. The IAN solution was removed, and the gels were washed with 1 ml 50% ACN/100 mM ABC twice for 10 min, with 1 ml 50% ACN/25 mM ABC twice for 10 min, then briefly dried by SpeedVac. Digestion was performed by adding 1 gel volume of 25 mM ABC containing 2.5 ng/μl of digestion grade trypsin (Promega, V5111) and incubating at 37 °C for 16 hours. The supernatants containing the tryptic peptides were transferred to new Eppendorf tubes. The residual peptides in the gel bands were extracted with 500 μl 80% ACN/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) for 15 min and combined with the original digests, then dried in a SpeedVac. The peptides were dissolved in 30 μl MS loading buffer (2% acetonitrile, 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid), with 5 μl injected for LC-MS/MS analysis.
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus equipped with a Waters nanoAcquity UPLC system utilizing a binary solvent system (A: 100% water, 0.1% formic acid; B: 100% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). Trapping was performed at 5 μl/min, 99.5% Buffer A for 3 min using a Waters Symmetry® C18 180μm x 20mm trap column. Peptides were separated using an ACQUITY UPLC PST (BEH) C18 nanoACQUITY Column (1.7 μm, 75 μm x 250 mm) maintained at 37 °C and eluted at 300 nl/min with the following gradient: 3% buffer B at initial conditions; 5% B at 1 minute; 25% B at 90 min; 50% B at 110 min; 90% B at 115 min; 90% B at 120 min; return to initial conditions at 125 min. MS was acquired in profile mode over the 300–1,700 m/z range using 1 microscan, 70,000 resolution, AGC target of 3E6, and a maximum injection time of 45 ms. Data dependent MS/MS were acquired in centroid mode on the top 20 precursors per MS scan using 1 microscan, 17,500 resolution, AGC target of 1E5, maximum injection time of 100 ms, and an isolation window of 1.7 m/z. Precursors were fragmented by HCD activation with a collision energy of 28%. MS/MS were collected on species with an intensity threshold of 1E4, charge states of 2–6, and peptide match preferred. Dynamic exclusion was set to 20 seconds.
Data was analyzed using Proteome Discoverer (version 2.5) (Thermo Scientific) software and searched in-house using the Mascot algorithm (version 2.8.0) (Matrix Science). The data was searched against the Swissprotein database with taxonomy restricted to Homo sapiens (20,405 sequences) along with a custom database containing the hSLC25A39-FLAG sequence. Search parameters used were trypsin digestion with up to 2 missed cleavages; peptide mass tolerance of 10 ppm; MS/MS fragment tolerance of 0.02 Da; fixed modification of carbamidomethyl cysteine, and variable modifications of methionine oxidation and deamidation on asparagine and glutamine. Normal and decoy database searches were performed, with the confidence level set to 95% (p<0.05). Scaffold v5.1.2 (Proteome Software Inc.) was used to validate MS/MS based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 95.0% probability. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 99.0% probability (assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm) and contained at least 2 identified peptides.
Cysteine labeling and mobility shift assay
Approximately 25 million clonal SLC25A39 and AFG3L2 double CRISPR KO K562 cells expressing SLC25A39-FLAG in each condition were washed with PBS, collected at 1,000 g for 2 min at 4 °C, suspended in 1.5 ml hypotonic buffer (100 mM sucrose, 1mM EGTA, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitor cocktail to form homogenous single-cell suspension, and kept on wet ice for 10 min, and then lysed by 30 gentle strokes in the 2 ml hand-held Dounce tissue grinder with tight-fitting pestle B (VMR, Kontes). Cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml EP tube and spun at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Afterward, the pellet was lysed with 150 μl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) reaction buffer containing 1% digitonin (w/v) wet ice for 15 min. Mitochondrial lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 5 min at 4 °C. For Cysteine labeling, 50 μl of mitochondrial lysates were reacted with the 50 μl of freshly prepared reaction buffer (4 mM EZ-link Iodoacetyl-PEG2-Biotin (Thermos scientific, 21334) in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0) and 1mM TCEP. The reaction was conducted in the dark at room temperature for 90 min, and quenched by an aliquot of 4x Laemmli Sample buffer (Bio-Rad, 1610747). To assay mobility of the labeled A39-FLAG, the samples were separated by SDS-PAGE using NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen, NP0335BOX) at 75 V for 6 hours, and anti-FLAG antibody was used to detect the both labeled and unlabeled A39-FLAG.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
For metabolite profiling experiments, data were shown as mean ± s.d., n≥3 biologically independent samples. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed t-test. Significance level was indicated as *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 and n.s. p > 0.05. All other important experiments were validated at least two times. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (8.4.3a), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 365), or as reported by the relevant computational tools.
Supplementary Material
Table S1. A39-FLAG SDS-PAGE gel band mass spectrometry results, related to Figure 2.
Highlights.
SLC25A39 is degraded by m-AAA protease AFG3L2 through the matrix loop 1
SLC25A39 senses mito iron using the matrix Cys residues, inhibiting degradation
Protein level of SLC25A39 controls mito glutathione uptake and homeostasis
SLC25A39 regulation occurs in neurons
Acknowledgements
We thank Yale School Medicine, Yale West Campus, Systems Biology Institute and Cancer Biology Institute for the instrumentation supports. We thank R. Liu for fruitful discussion and feedback on the project; W.Li and Y.Liu for guidance on proteomics analysis. This research was funded by National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant R35GM150619 (H.S.) and Rita Allen Foundation Scholars Award (H.S.). The iPSC line was obtained through the NIH iNDI and CZI NDCN program. We thank the MS & Proteomics Resource at Yale University for providing the necessary mass spectrometers and the accompany biotechnology tools funded in part by the Yale School of Medicine and by the Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health (S10OD02365101A1, S10OD019967, and S10OD018034) -- these funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Cunningham CN, and Rutter J (2020). 20,000 picometers under the OMM: diving into the vastness of mitochondrial metabolite transport. EMBO Rep 21, e50071. 10.15252/embr.202050071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kunji ERS, King MS, Ruprecht JJ, and Thangaratnarajah C (2020). The SLC25 Carrier Family: Important Transport Proteins in Mitochondrial Physiology and Pathology. Physiology (Bethesda) 35, 302–327. 10.1152/physiol.00009.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Palmieri F (2013). The mitochondrial transporter family SLC25: identification, properties and physiopathology. Mol Aspects Med 34, 465–484. 10.1016/j.mam.2012.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bar-Peled L, and Kory N (2022). Principles and functions of metabolic compartmentalization. Nat Metab 4, 1232–1244. 10.1038/s42255-022-00645-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Balaban RS, Nemoto S, and Finkel T (2005). Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell 120, 483–495. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murphy MP (2009). How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J 417, 1–13. 10.1042/BJ20081386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Finkel T (2012). Signal transduction by mitochondrial oxidants. J Biol Chem 287, 4434–4440. 10.1074/jbc.R111.271999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.D’Autreaux B, and Toledano MB (2007). ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8, 813–824. 10.1038/nrm2256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meister A, and Anderson ME (1983). Glutathione. Annu Rev Biochem 52, 711–760. 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.003431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mari M, Morales A, Colell A, Garcia-Ruiz C, Kaplowitz N, and Fernandez-Checa JC (2013). Mitochondrial glutathione: features, regulation and role in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830, 3317–3328. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rouault TA, and Tong WH (2008). Iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis and human disease. Trends Genet 24, 398–407. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lill R (2009). Function and biogenesis of iron-sulphur proteins. Nature 460, 831–838. 10.1038/nature08301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shi X, Reinstadler B, Shah H, To TL, Byrne K, Summer L, Calvo SE, Goldberger O, Doench JG, Mootha VK, and Shen H (2022). Combinatorial GxGxE CRISPR screen identifies SLC25A39 in mitochondrial glutathione transport linking iron homeostasis to OXPHOS. Nat Commun 13, 2483. 10.1038/s41467-022-30126-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Y, Yen FS, Zhu XG, Timson RC, Weber R, Xing C, Liu Y, Allwein B, Luo H, Yeh HW, et al. (2021). SLC25A39 is necessary for mitochondrial glutathione import in mammalian cells. Nature 599, 136–140. 10.1038/s41586-021-04025-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Byrne KL, Szeligowski RV, and Shen H (2023). Phylogenetic Analysis Guides Transporter Protein Deorphanization: A Case Study of the SLC25 Family of Mitochondrial Metabolite Transporters. Biomolecules 13. 10.3390/biom13091314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Zidek A, Potapenko A, et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Murphy MP (2012). Mitochondrial thiols in antioxidant protection and redox signaling: distinct roles for glutathionylation and other thiol modifications. Antioxid Redox Signal 16, 476–495. 10.1089/ars.2011.4289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Requejo R, Hurd TR, Costa NJ, and Murphy MP (2010). Cysteine residues exposed on protein surfaces are the dominant intramitochondrial thiol and may protect against oxidative damage. FEBS J 277, 1465–1480. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07576.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nilsson BL, Soellner MB, and Raines RT (2005). Chemical synthesis of proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 34, 91–118. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.040204.144700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cho NH, Cheveralls KC, Brunner AD, Kim K, Michaelis AC, Raghavan P, Kobayashi H, Savy L, Li JY, Canaj H, et al. (2022). OpenCell: Endogenous tagging for the cartography of human cellular organization. Science 375, eabi6983. 10.1126/science.abi6983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mathieson T, Franken H, Kosinski J, Kurzawa N, Zinn N, Sweetman G, Poeckel D, Ratnu VS, Schramm M, Becher I, et al. (2018). Systematic analysis of protein turnover in primary cells. Nat Commun 9, 689. 10.1038/s41467-018-03106-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zecha J, Meng C, Zolg DP, Samaras P, Wilhelm M, and Kuster B (2018). Peptide Level Turnover Measurements Enable the Study of Proteoform Dynamics. Mol Cell Proteomics 17, 974–992. 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Morgenstern M, Peikert CD, Lubbert P, Suppanz I, Klemm C, Alka O, Steiert C, Naumenko N, Schendzielorz A, Melchionda L, et al. (2021). Quantitative high-confidence human mitochondrial proteome and its dynamics in cellular context. Cell Metab 33, 2464–2483 e2418. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen WW, Freinkman E, and Sabatini DM (2017). Rapid immunopurification of mitochondria for metabolite profiling and absolute quantification of matrix metabolites. Nat Protoc 12, 2215–2231. 10.1038/nprot.2017.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen WW, Freinkman E, Wang T, Birsoy K, and Sabatini DM (2016). Absolute Quantification of Matrix Metabolites Reveals the Dynamics of Mitochondrial Metabolism. Cell 166, 1324–1337 e1311. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Horwich AL, Fenton WA, Chapman E, and Farr GW (2007). Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23, 115–145. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Arlt H, Tauer R, Feldmann H, Neupert W, and Langer T (1996). The YTA10–12 complex, an AAA protease with chaperone-like activity in the inner membrane of mitochondria. Cell 85, 875–885. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81271-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Di Bella D, Lazzaro F, Brusco A, Plumari M, Battaglia G, Pastore A, Finardi A, Cagnoli C, Tempia F, Frontali M, et al. (2010). Mutations in the mitochondrial protease gene AFG3L2 cause dominant hereditary ataxia SCA28. Nat Genet 42, 313–321. 10.1038/ng.544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pierson TM, Adams D, Bonn F, Martinelli P, Cherukuri PF, Teer JK, Hansen NF, Cruz P, Mullikin For The Nisc Comparative Sequencing Program, J.C., Blakesley RW, et al. (2011). Whole-exome sequencing identifies homozygous AFG3L2 mutations in a spastic ataxia-neuropathy syndrome linked to mitochondrial m-AAA proteases. PLoS Genet 7, e1002325. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Srinivasan V, Pierik AJ, and Lill R (2014). Crystal structures of nucleotide-free and glutathione-bound mitochondrial ABC transporter Atm1. Science 343, 1137–1140. 10.1126/science.1246729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koppen M, Metodiev MD, Casari G, Rugarli EI, and Langer T (2007). Variable and tissue-specific subunit composition of mitochondrial m-AAA protease complexes linked to hereditary spastic paraplegia. Mol Cell Biol 27, 758–767. 10.1128/MCB.01470-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Atorino L, Silvestri L, Koppen M, Cassina L, Ballabio A, Marconi R, Langer T, and Casari G (2003). Loss of m-AAA protease in mitochondria causes complex I deficiency and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress in hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Cell Biol 163, 777–787. 10.1083/jcb.200304112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Patron M, Tarasenko D, Nolte H, Kroczek L, Ghosh M, Ohba Y, Lasarzewski Y, Ahmadi ZA, Cabrera-Orefice A, Eyiama A, et al. (2022). Regulation of mitochondrial proteostasis by the proton gradient. EMBO J 41, e110476. 10.15252/embj.2021110476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Luk E, Carroll M, Baker M, and Culotta VC (2003). Manganese activation of superoxide dismutase 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires MTM1, a member of the mitochondrial carrier family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 10353–10357. 10.1073/pnas.1632471100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nilsson R, Schultz IJ, Pierce EL, Soltis KA, Naranuntarat A, Ward DM, Baughman JM, Paradkar PN, Kingsley PD, Culotta VC, et al. (2009). Discovery of genes essential for heme biosynthesis through large-scale gene expression analysis. Cell Metab 10, 119–130. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Magri S, Fracasso V, Plumari M, Alfei E, Ghezzi D, Gellera C, Rusmini P, Poletti A, Di Bella D, Elia AE, et al. (2018). Concurrent AFG3L2 and SPG7 mutations associated with syndromic parkinsonism and optic atrophy with aberrant OPA1 processing and mitochondrial network fragmentation. Hum Mutat 39, 2060–2071. 10.1002/humu.23658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gialluisi A, Reccia MG, Modugno N, Nutile T, Lombardi A, Di Giovannantonio LG, Pietracupa S, Ruggiero D, Scala S, Gambardella S, et al. (2021). Identification of sixteen novel candidate genes for late onset Parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 16, 35. 10.1186/s13024-021-00455-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang Y, Pak C, Han Y, Ahlenius H, Zhang Z, Chanda S, Marro S, Patzke C, Acuna C, Covy J, et al. (2013). Rapid single-step induction of functional neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Neuron 78, 785–798. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fernandopulle MS, Prestil R, Grunseich C, Wang C, Gan L, and Ward ME (2018). Transcription Factor-Mediated Differentiation of Human iPSCs into Neurons. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 79, e51. 10.1002/cpcb.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pantazis CB, Yang A, Lara E, McDonough JA, Blauwendraat C, Peng L, Oguro H, Kanaujiya J, Zou J, Sebesta D, et al. (2022). A reference human induced pluripotent stem cell line for large-scale collaborative studies. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1685–1702 e1622. 10.1016/j.stem.2022.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu Y, Liu S, Tomar A, Yen FS, Unlu G, Ropek N, Weber RA, Wang Y, Khan A, Gad M, et al. (2023). Autoregulatory control of mitochondrial glutathione homeostasis. Science, eadf4154. 10.1126/science.adf4154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sprenger HG, MacVicar T, Bahat A, Fiedler KU, Hermans S, Ehrentraut D, Ried K, Milenkovic D, Bonekamp N, Larsson NG, et al. (2021). Cellular pyrimidine imbalance triggers mitochondrial DNA-dependent innate immunity. Nat Metab 3, 636–650. 10.1038/s42255-021-00385-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Quiros PM, Langer T, and Lopez-Otin C (2015). New roles for mitochondrial proteases in health, ageing and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 345–359. 10.1038/nrm3984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang C, Ward ME, Chen R, Liu K, Tracy TE, Chen X, Xie M, Sohn PD, Ludwig C, Meyer-Franke A, et al. (2017). Scalable Production of iPSC-Derived Human Neurons to Identify Tau-Lowering Compounds by High-Content Screening. Stem Cell Reports 9, 1221–1233. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, Yuan D, Stroe O, Wood G, Laydon A, et al. (2022). AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 50, D439–D444. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. A39-FLAG SDS-PAGE gel band mass spectrometry results, related to Figure 2.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data for the proteomics have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD047327 and is publicly available as of the date of publication.
This paper does not report original codes.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
