Abstract
Background:
There are limited data on clinical outcomes associated with use of bebtelovimab for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among cancer patients. We aimed to define the clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients receiving bebtelovimab as part of the COVID-19 therapeutics program at our cancer center.
Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study of immunosuppressed adult patients who received bebtelovimab at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center between March 2022, and November 2022. We reviewed medical records to capture date of first positive COVID-19 test, clinical characteristics, outcomes and follow-up COVID-19 testing for 60 days after first positive. Persistent infection was defined as a positive test beyond day 30; these patients were reviewed beyond day 60.
Results
Among 93 patients who received bebtelovimab, 64 (69%) had hematologic malignancy. Sixty-nine (74%) patients received bebtelovimab within 2 days after diagnosis. Two (2%) patients were hospitalized, none required ICU care, and one patient died on day 52; although it is unknown if death was directly related to COVID-19. Ten (11%) patients had persistent COVID-19 infection; of these, four received additional COVID-19 therapy with either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir, and five out of six patients with sequencing data available had spike protein mutations associated with bebtelovimab resistance.
Conclusion
A coordinated systems-based approach led to prompt initiation of bebtelovimab within two days of testing positive in most patients. We observed few hospitalizations or deaths. Persistent infection was noted in 11% of patients with four requiring additional therapies, highlighting a need for novel strategies to manage immunosuppressed patients.
Keywords: COVID-19, Bebtelovimab, Immunocompromised
Graphical Abstract

Favorable outcomes after treatment with bebtelovimab. A coordinated approach led to prompt initiation of monoclonal antibody therapy. Persistent infection noted in 11% of patients.
Background
Immunocompromised individuals, including those with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients, are at increased risk of poor outcomes after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, including hospitalization and death. Mortality rates in patients with underlying hematologic malignancies and HCT have ranged from 12 – 48%1,2 Additionally, some patients with hematologic malignancy experience persistent symptomatic infection accompanied by prolonged viral shedding.1–6
Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAb) directed against the SARS CoV-2 spike protein have been associated with a reduction in the rate of progression to severe COVID-19, time to viral clearance and death.7–9Bebtelovimab is a recombinant neutralizing human IgG1λ mAb to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 that received emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2022 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-1910; its EUA was rescinded in November 2022 as it was no longer expected to neutralize circulating variants11.
There are limited data on clinical outcomes associated with use of bebtelovimab for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 among cancer patients. Furthermore, no studies have evaluated the effect of bebtelovimab on outcomes such as persistent COVID-19 infection, a distinct clinical entity among profoundly immunosuppressed patients with hematologic malignancy.12,13 Although bebtelovimab is no longer authorized for treatment of COVID-19, understanding outcomes in the immunocompromised population may help guide development of novel mAb therapies. We aimed to characterize the clinical outcomes, including persistent infection among patients receiving bebtelovimab as part of the COVID-19 therapeutics program at our large comprehensive cancer center.
Methods
Study design
We performed a single center retrospective cohort study of immunosuppressed adult patients with COVID-19 infection who received bebtelovimab at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center between March 31st, 2022, and November 7th, 2022. Patients were identified through our institution’s COVID-19 Therapeutics Program whereby an Infectious Diseases provider reviewed all daily reported positive COVID tests to determine eligibility for treatment with mAb therapy. At our center, bebtelovimab was offered to outpatients ≥18 years old with immunocompromise or other high-risk condition with mild-moderate COVID-19 infection diagnosed by either polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or rapid antigen test for whom alternative therapies (e.g., nirmatrelvir/ ritonavir and remdesivir) were not an option, due to significant drug-drug interactions with oral agents, and lack of availability of remdesivir in the outpatient setting.
We performed chart review to obtain demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and laboratory test results. The primary outcome was hospitalization and/or death due to COVID-19 infection within 60 days after initial diagnosis (defined as the date of the first positive test). Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) stay within 60 days after initial diagnosis and persistent COVID-19 infection. Persistent COVID-19 infection was defined as a positive PCR test beyond day 30; these patients were reviewed beyond day 60 for additional SARS-CoV-2 test results and therapies. This study was approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board.
Sequencing was performed as previously described14,15. Briefly, RNA was extracted from residual clinical specimens using either Roche MagNA Pure 96 or ThermoFisher KingFisher platforms following manufacturer instructions. Sequencing libraries were prepared using multiplexed amplicon panels from Swift Biosciences (IDT) or Illumina COVIDSeq and sequenced on Illumina NextSeq 2000 or NovaSeq instruments using a 2×150 read format. Raw reads were processed using a custom bioinformatics pipeline (https://github.com/greninger-lab/covid_swift_pipeline) that performs adapter and quality trimming and filtering, masking of primers, generation of consensus sequences, and variant annotation. Phylogenetic lineage assignment was done using Pangolin (https://pangolin.cog-uk.io/) and Nextclade (https://clades.nextstrain.org/).
Statistical analysis
Data were summarized using descriptive statistics, including the median and range for continuous variables and frequency tabulations and percentages for categorical variables. SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.
Results
Patient population
A total of 93 patients (median age 65 years; 60% male) received bebtelovimab. Sixty-four (69%) had an underlying hematologic malignancy. Twenty-one (23%) had undergone HCT and one had received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Seventy-four patients (80%) had received ≥ 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccination prior to their first positive test. More than half had received active treatment for their underlying malignancy in the two weeks prior to their first positive test. Sixty-nine (74%) patients received bebtelovimab within 2 days after first positive test; all patients received bebtelovimab within 7 days. Additional baseline characteristics are described in Table 1.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients Receiving Bebtelovimab1
| Characteristic | All Eligible Patients |
|---|---|
| Demographics | |
| Age in years, median (range) | 65 (21 – 88) |
| Sex | |
| Female | 37 (40%) |
| Race | |
| White | 75 (81%) |
| Asian | 7 (8%) |
| Other | 8 (9%) |
| Unknown | 3(3%) |
| Clinical Characteristics | |
| Underlying malignancy or condition | |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukemia2 | 13 (14%) |
| Acute myeloid leukemia | 12 (13%) |
| Chronic myeloid leukemia | 1 (1%) |
| Chronic lymphocytic leukemia | 13 (14%) |
| MDS/MPN | 5 (5%) |
| Lymphoma | 12 (13%) |
| Multiple Myeloma | 8 (9%) |
| Other hematologic disorder3 | 4 (4%) |
| Solid tumor | 25 (27%) |
| Comorbidities | |
| Body Mass Index >25 | 48 (52%) |
| Chronic kidney disease | 10 (11%) |
| Diabetes | 17 (18%) |
| Cardiovascular disease | 16 (17%) |
| Chronic lung disease | 2 (2%) |
| Chronic liver disease | 1 (1%) |
| Number of comorbidities4 | |
| 1 | 33 (35%) |
| 2 | 33 (35%) |
| ≥3 | 27 (29%) |
| Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received prior to COVID-19 diagnosis | |
| 0 | 9 (10%) |
| 1 | 9 (10%) |
| 2 | 22 (24%) |
| 3 | 31 (34%) |
| 4 | 20 (22%) |
| 5 | 1 (1%) |
| Developed COVID – 19 symptoms | 93 (100%) |
| Timing of symptom onset relative to COVID-19 diagnosis | |
| Symptom onset before COVID-19 diagnosis | 79 (85%) |
| Symptom onset after COVID-19 diagnosis5 | 4 (4%) |
| Symptom onset date unknown | 10 (11%) |
| Days from symptom onset to COVID-19 diagnosis, median (range)6 | 1 (0–6) |
| Days from COVID-19 diagnosis to symptom onset, median (range)7 | 2 (1–4) |
| Days from most recent prior vaccination to COVID-19 diagnosis, median (range) | 219 (0 – 564) |
| Days from COVID-19 diagnosis to Bebtelovimab administration | |
| Same day | 11 (12%) |
| 1 | 36 (39%) |
| 2 | 22 (24%) |
| ≥3 | 24 (26%) |
| Cancer Related Treatments Received | |
| Hematopoietic cell transplant recipient | 21 (23%) |
| Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell recipient | 1 (1%) |
| Receipt of anti-CD20 antibodies within 1 year prior to COVID-19 diagnosis | 9 (10%) |
| Receipt of active treatment in 2 weeks prior to COVID-19 diagnosis8 | 51 (55%) |
| Receipt and dose of systemic steroids in 2 weeks prior to COVID-19 diagnosis | |
| None | 80 (86%) |
| Less than 1 mg/kg of prednisone equivalent | 12 (13%) |
| 1 or more mg/kg of prednisone equivalent | 1 (1%) |
| COVID-19 Related treatments received | |
| Receipt of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir at time of COVID-19 diagnosis9 | 4 (4%) |
Among n=93 total patients. Baseline was date of COVID-19 diagnosis. Numbers shown are n(%) unless otherwise specified. Numbers may not add to totals due to missing data.
Eleven were B-cell ALL and 2 were T-cell ALL
Includes 2 patients with Waldenstorm’s macroglobulinemia and 2 patients with aplastic anemia.
Includes underlying malignancy as a comorbidity.
Symptom onset was before bebtelovimab initiation in all cases
Among those with symptom onset before COVID-19 diagnosis
Among those with symptom onset after COVID-19 diagnosis
Includes chemotherapy, treatments for underlying malignancy.
Two patients only received 2 doses of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir each, one patient received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days, and one patient was intentionally treated with both nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and bebtelovimab.
Outcomes
Two (2%) patients required hospitalization directly related to their COVID-19 infection, none required ICU care, and one patient died on day 52, although it is unclear if the death was directly related to COVID-19. Twenty-six (28%) of 93 patients had a documented COVID-19 test obtained between day 30 and day 60; 10/93 (11%) individuals were known to have virologic evidence of persistent COVID-19 infection.
Among the 10 patients with persistent COVID-19 infection (Table 2), the median age was 66 years. Six (60%) had received active treatment for their malignancy in the two weeks prior to the first positive test. Half of the patients received bebtelovimab within two days of their positive test and one (10%) patient was unvaccinated at the time of their initial diagnosis. All 10 patients eventually tested negative. The median duration of COVID-19 test positivity was 47 days (range 33–155 days). Among these 10 patients, five had documentation of persistent symptoms; six had a negative test at or before day 60. Four remained positive after day 60 and four received additional COVID-19 therapy with either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir. None of these 10 patients developed serious complications requiring hospitalization or ICU admission for their persistent COVID-19 infection prior to day 60 or during the extended follow up period among those positive beyond day 60. One patient was admitted for remdesivir administration, due to logistical challenges with outpatient administration.
Table 2.
Characteristics of Patients with Persistent COVID-19 Infection1
| Patient | Age (years) | Sex | Underlying Diagnosis | On treatment for malignancy2 | History of HCT | Number of vaccine doses3 | Days to mAb administration | Duration of test positivity4 | Persistent Symptoms5 | Additional treatment | Bebtelovimab resistance mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | Male | Myeloid sarcoma | Yes | No | 2 | 1 | 33 | No | - | N/A |
| 2 | 63 | Female | B-ALL | No | No | 4 | 2 | 33 | Yes | Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir6 | K444N, V445A |
| 3 | 38 | Male | Lymphoma | Yes | No | 2 | 5 | 37 | No | Remdesivir7 | K444N |
| 4 | 70 | Male | AML | Yes | No | 3 | 3 | 42 | Unknown | - | None detected |
| 5 | 65 | Male | AML | Yes | No | 3 | Same day | 46 | No | - | N/A |
| 6 | 79 | Female | MM | Yes | No | 3 | 5 | 47 | No | - | N/A |
| 7 | 67 | Female | CLL | No | No | 4 | 7 | 83 | Yes | - | N/A |
| 8 | 68 | Female | B-ALL | Yes | No | 3 | 3 | 83 | Yes | - | K444N, V445F |
| 9 | 70 | Male | AML | No | Yes | 0 | 1 | 111 | Yes | Remdesivir8 | K444N, V445F, G446R |
| 10 | 55 | Male | B-ALL | No | Yes | 2 | 1 | 155 | Yes | Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir9 | K444N |
None of these patients had a COVID-19-related hospitalization, ICU stay, or died up to day 60
Receipt of active treatment for malignancy in the 2 weeks prior to first positive COVID-19 test. Only patient #8 received anti-CD20 antibody therapy in the year prior to first positive COVID-19 test.
Number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received prior to first positive COVID-19 test
Number of days between first and last positive COVID-19 test
Symptomatic more than 30 days after first positive COVID-19 test
Received 2 doses on the day of first positive COVID-19 test which was stopped due to drug-drug interactions
Although patient was asymptomatic, patient received a 10-day course on day 39 after first positive COVID-19 test due to his anticipated stem cell transplant
Received a 5-day course on day 111 after first positive COVID-19 test
Received an 18-day course on day 141 after first positive COVID-19 test
Abbreviations: Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), Monoclonal antibody (mAb), Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Multiple Myeloma (MM), B-cell Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL),
Sequencing data
Sequence data was obtained for 6 out of the 10 patients with persistent infection with lineages 21K/BA.1 (n=1), 22C/BA.2 (n=2), and 22B/BA.5 (n=3) (Supplemental Table). Sequencing data for the index positive COVID-19 test was only available for one patient. In five out of six patients, the spike gene consensus sequence contained the K444N mutation, which is associated with resistance to bebtelovimab9. In one patient where sequence data was available for two time points, the mutation G446R went from 80% allele frequency to fixation. In addition, mutations V445F and V445A were present at low allele frequency (1–3%) in three patients. One patient did not have any mutations with known association with bebtelovimab resistance, however sequence data was only available for a single timepoint which was the day the patient tested positive for COVID -19 and received bebtelovimab.
Discussion
In this evaluation of patients at our cancer center treated with bebtelovimab for COVID-19, a coordinated systems-based approach led to prompt initiation of bebtelovimab within two days of testing positive in three-quarters of patients. We observed few hospitalizations or deaths in a population at high risk for poor outcomes. Persistent infection was noted among 11% of patients with 4 requiring additional therapies.
Neutralizing mAb therapies that target the SARS-COV-2 spike protein have played an important role throughout the COVID-19 pandemic for the treatment of high risk outpatients, particularly when nirmatrelvir-ritonavir use is precluded by significant drug-drug interactions7,16. The initial data that led to the EUA for bebtelovimab came from in vitro neutralization studies and a phase 1/2 clinical trial conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variants and was not powered to determine differences in clinical outcomes.10 Since then, there have been a few published studies that examined outcomes of bebtelovimab therapy in high-risk patients17–21,: none have focused exclusively on cancer patients.
McCreary et al found that treatment of high-risk patients with bebtelovimab was associated with 50% lower odds of hospitalization or death at 28 days compared with matched nontreated controls22. Razonable et al observed that bebtelovimab was associated with similarly low rates of severe outcomes as sotrovimab (1.3% vs 2.2%) and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (1.4% vs 1.2%).19,21 Yetmar et al found that solid organ transplant recipients who received bebtelovimab had similar rates of COVID-19 related hospitalization as those who received sotrovimab (3.3% vs 3.0)20.
While our study shows similarly low rates of hospitalization and death18,21 compared to previously published studies, to our knowledge, no study has evaluated outcomes with respect to persistent infection among those treated with monoclonal antibody therapy. We found that 11% of patients had evidence of persistent virologic detection beyond 30 days; half of whom had persistent symptoms. This group consisted predominantly of patients with hematologic malignancy, including those with B-cell dysfunction, similarly to other published reports of persistent COVID-19 infection5,23–25. In contrast to other reports of persistent infection, none of our patients developed serious complications requiring hospitalization or ICU care23,24,26,27. However, 4/10 patients required additional therapies including remdesivir and extended durations of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, despite 3 of the 4 patients receiving bebtelovimab within 2 days of diagnosis24,26,27.
Notably, 5 of 6 patients with persistent infection for whom we had sequence data had evidence of mutations in the spike protein associated with bebtelovimab resistance. As pre-bebtelovimab isolates were not available for sequencing, we were not able to determine whether these mutations developed as a result of intrahost viral evolution over the course of their persistent infection. Data regarding bebtelovimab resistance in the context of persistent infection is lacking. However, some studies have suggested that persistent infection in immunocompromised hosts treated with monoclonal antibody therapies may be a result of selection of resistance mutations in the spike protein. Huygens et al detected new key spike mutations associated with reduced in vitro susceptibility in 6 out of 16 (38%) patients after the administration of sotrovimab. Furthermore, 5 patients were found to have persistently high viral load after sotrovimab administration; spike mutations were found in 4 of these patients28. Gliga et al also found emergence of viral spike protein mutations in 32% of their immunocompromised patients, which reduced sensitivity to sotrovimab in a pseudovirus neutralization assay29. It is unknown whether early treatment with combination therapy (e.g., monoclonal antibody and antiviral therapy) could potentially modify the risk of resistance and persistent infection.
Studies have found that COVID-19 infection in patients with underlying hematologic malignancies may have a more protracted clinical course with delayed viral clearance and progressive or waxing and waning respiratory symptoms for weeks to months after initial diagnosis.8,30 This may have a significant impact not only on an individual’s quality of life but also cancer care, leading to delays in chemotherapy or transplant; on a public health level, persistent infection among immunosuppressed individuals may lead to selection of globally significant viral variants transmissible to susceptible contacts. There are limited data describing the prevalence of persistent COVID-19 infection and outcomes among cancer patients following treatment of initial infection. Future studies of novel COVID-19 therapeutics should evaluate persistent COVID-19 infection as an outcome among immunosuppressed patients.
Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature which is subject to intrinsic sources of bias and confounding; the lack of a control group limits the ability to draw conclusions regarding the relative impact of bebtelovimab on clinical outcomes. The prevalence of persistent disease may be underestimated due to limited testing performed after day 30. However, we believe that we were able to capture clinically significant persistent infection as they presented for care and received additional therapies. Center-based selection may also have enriched for persistence due to the inclusion of a large number of hematologic malignancy patients. Lack of consistent longitudinal sampling for sequencing limits the ability to distinguish whether resistance mutations were acquired at infection versus those arising and sweeping to fixation during treatment.
Conclusions
Our retrospective review of patients at our ambulatory cancer center demonstrates low rates of hospitalization and death after treatment with bebtelovimab. A coordinated approach led to prompt initiation of this monoclonal antibody within 2 days of testing positive in most patients. Persistent infection was noted in 11% of patients, highlighting a need for novel strategies to manage highly immunosuppressed cancer patients.
Disclosures
Steven A Pergam: Receives research support from Global Life Technologies, Inc., and participate in clinical trials with F2G, Cidara and Symbio.
Catherine Liu: Site Investigator, clinical trial (Pfizer)
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements and funding
Research supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32AI118690 and National Institutes of Health/ National Cancer Institute (NIH/ NCI) Cancer Center Support Grants P30 CA15704.
Abbreviations used:
- COVID-19
coronavirus disease 2019
- HCT
hematopoietic cell transplantation
- SARS-CoV-2
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- mAb
monoclonal antibodies
- EUA
emergency use authorization
- FDA
United States Federal Drug Administration
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- ICU
intensive care unit
References
- 1.Belsky JA, Tullius BP, Lamb MG, Sayegh R, Stanek JR, Auletta JJ. COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients: A systematic review of cancer, hematopoietic cell and solid organ transplant patients. J Infect. 2021;82(3):329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.01.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Langerbeins P, Hallek M. COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2022;140(3):236–252. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021012251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Malahe SRK, Hoek RAS, Dalm VASH, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Immunocompromised Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Caused by the Omicron Variant: A Prospective, Observational Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;76(3):e172–e178. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sharma A, Bhatt NS, St Martin A, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: an observational cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2021;8(3):e185–e193. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30429-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shahzad M, Chaudhary SG, Zafar MU, et al. Impact of COVID-19 in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Infectious Disease. 2022;24(2):e13792. doi: 10.1111/tid.13792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu C, Yoke LH, Bhattacharyya P, et al. Successful Treatment of Persistent Symptomatic Coronavirus Disease 19 Infection With Extended-Duration Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Among Outpatients With Hematologic Cancer. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2023;10(6):ofad306. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cesaro S, Ljungman P, Mikulska M, et al. Recommendations for the management of COVID-19 in patients with haematological malignancies or haematopoietic cell transplantation, from the 2021 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 9). Leukemia. 2022;36(6):1467–1480. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01578-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marasco V, Piciocchi A, Candoni A, et al. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in haematological patients paucisymptomatic for COVID‐19: The GIMEMA EMATO‐0321 study. Br J Haematol. 2022;199(1):54–60. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Casirivimab and imdevimab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):665–676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00163-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fact sheet for healthcare providers: Emergency use authorization for bebtelovimab. February 11, 2022. Accessed September 5, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/media/156152/download
- 11.Research C for DE and. FDA Announces Bebtelovimab is Not Currently Authorized in Any US Region. FDA. Published online November 30, 2022. Accessed May 16, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-announces-bebtelovimab-not-currently-authorized-any-us-region [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laracy JC, Kamboj M, Vardhana SA. Long and persistent COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancies: from bench to bedside. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2022;35(4):271. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dioverti V, Salto-Alejandre S, Haidar G. Immunocompromised Patients with Protracted COVID-19: a Review of “Long Persisters.” Curr Transplant Rep. 2022;9(4):209–218. doi: 10.1007/s40472-022-00385-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Roychoudhury P, Luo S, Hayashibara K, et al. Identification of Omicron-Delta Coinfections Using PCR-Based Genotyping. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(3):e0060522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00605-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shrestha L, Lin MJ, Xie H, et al. Clinical Performance Characteristics of the Swift Normalase Amplicon Panel for Sensitive Recovery of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Genomes. J Mol Diagn. 2022;24(9):963–976. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. Accessed September 5, 2023.https://files.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/guidelines/covid19treatmentguidelines.pdf
- 17.Shertel T, Lange NW, Salerno DM, et al. Bebtelovimab for Treatment of COVID-19 in Ambulatory Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2022;106(10):e463–e464. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dryden-Peterson S, Kim A, Joyce MR, et al. Bebtelovimab for High-Risk Outpatients With Early COVID-19 in a Large US Health System. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(11):ofac565. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Razonable RR, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Hanson SN, et al. Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Bebtelovimab and Sotrovimab Treatment of High-risk Persons With Coronavirus Disease 2019 During the Omicron Epoch. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(10):ofac411. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yetmar ZA, Beam E, O’Horo JC, et al. Outcomes of bebtelovimab and sotrovimab treatment of solid organ transplant recipients with mild‐to‐moderate coronavirus disease 2019 during the Omicron epoch. Transpl Infect Dis. Published online July 25, 2022:e13901. doi: 10.1111/tid.13901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Razonable RR, O’Horo JC, Hanson SN, et al. Comparable Outcomes for Bebtelovimab and Ritonavir-Boosted Nirmatrelvir Treatment in High-Risk Patients With Coronavirus Disease-2019 During Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 BA.2 Omicron Epoch. J Infect Dis. Published online September 17, 2022:jiac346. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCreary EK, Kip KE, Collins K, et al. Evaluation of Bebtelovimab for Treatment of Covid-19 During the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Era. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(10):ofac517. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Graziani L, Gori L, Manciulli T, et al. Successful use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in immunocompromised patients with persistent and/or relapsing COVID-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Lazzari L, Oltolini C, Ciceri F, Giglio F. Complicated and persistent severe COVID-19 pneumonia in a recipient of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(10):e245992. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-245992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Han A, Rodriguez TE, Beck ET, et al. Persistent SARS-CoV-2 infectivity greater than 50 days in a case series of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipients. Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports. 2021;3:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.cpccr.2021.100057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Helleberg M, Niemann CU, Moestrup KS, et al. Persistent COVID-19 in an Immunocompromised Patient Temporarily Responsive to Two Courses of Remdesivir Therapy. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;222(7):1103–1107. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Trottier CA, Wong B, Kohli R, et al. Dual Antiviral Therapy for Persistent Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Associated Organizing Pneumonia in an Immunocompromised Host. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2023;76(5):923–925. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huygens S, Oude Munnink B, Gharbharan A, Koopmans M, Rijnders B. Sotrovimab Resistance and Viral Persistence After Treatment of Immunocompromised Patients Infected With the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron Variant. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;76(3):e507–e509. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gliga S, Lübke N, Killer A, et al. Rapid Selection of Sotrovimab Escape Variants in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron-Infected Immunocompromised Patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3):408–415. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gaitzsch E, Passerini V, Khatamzas E, et al. COVID-19 in Patients Receiving CD20-depleting Immunochemotherapy for B-cell Lymphoma. HemaSphere. 2021;5(7):e603. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
