Abstract
Background:
Bacterial meningoencephalitis is a serious infection affecting the brain and its surrounding membranes. While imaging studies play a crucial role in diagnosing this condition, the typical radiological findings are well-documented. However, this case report describes an unusual imaging presentation that deviates from the expected patterns, emphasizing the need for awareness of such variations.
Case presentation:
A 7-year-old female with no prior medical history was referred to our hospital with fever, seizure, and loss of Consciousness. She had mild flu a week before admission. The duration of seizure episodes were 2–3 min, with tonic-clonic uncontrollable jerky movements. Brudzinski and Kernig signs were positive and plantar reflex was upward bilaterally in the physical examination. The computed tomography (CT) scan showed brain ventriculomegaly/hydrocephalus, and MRI findings indicated multiple foci located at cerebellum, basal ganglia, and thalamus alongside intensely restricted diffusion of the layering debris, suggesting pyogenic ventriculitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed severe hypoglycorrhachia, despite non-significant increase of protein. The patient was undergone antibiotic therapy with ceftriaxone, vancomycin and rifampin, resulting in normalization of CSF values.
Conclusion:
This case report highlights the importance of recognizing and interpreting unusual imaging presentations of bacterial meningoencephalitis in paediatric patients. It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive diagnostic approach, including clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, and imaging studies, to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of this potentially life-threatening condition. Further research and awareness of atypical imaging findings are warranted to enhance our understanding and improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: bacterial meningitis, hydrocephalus, paediatric neurosurgery, streptococcal infection
Introduction
Highlights
Bacterial meningoencephalitis significantly contributes to mortality and morbidity among children.
The development of hydrocephalus, a potential complication of bacterial meningoencephalitis, necessitates neurosurgical interventions.
Prompt initiation of antibiotic treatment is crucial.
Gaining knowledge about the various radiological presentations of this disease is essential.
Streptococcal meningitis is an acute inflammation of the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord caused by bacteria from the streptococcal species1. Bacterial meningitis is a severe and life-threatening infection that may lead to death, especially when treatment initiation is overdue2. The microorganisms causing this particular form of meningitis have the potential to also cause deeper infections that lead to encephalitis3. Encephalitis is typically characterized by mild flu-like symptoms in affected individuals4. However, in more severe cases, symptoms may include difficulties with speech or hearing, double vision, hallucinations, changes in personality, and loss of consciousness5. In Iran, the occurrence rate of paediatric bacterial meningoencephalitis is documented to reach up to 0.09 per 100 000 individuals. However, it is important to note that the actual number of cases may be significantly higher, as many individuals may experience mild or even no symptoms6,7.
Bacterial meningitis and encephalitis are medical emergencies and need urgent attention and treatment. Any delay in diagnosis and treatment has been shown to increase morbidity and mortality8. Some of the survivors also have neurological sequel with a need for long term physical and occupational rehabilitation9. Various methods are employed to diagnose meningoencephalitis, including physical examinations, blood analysis, analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and interpretation of radiological findings. These are the primary tests utilized in the diagnostic process for this condition. In this report, we present a case of streptococcal meningoencephalitis that was challenging to diagnose due to the presence of uncommon radiological findings.
Case presentation
A previously healthy 7-year-old female with a history of a common cold a week prior to the admission, was referred to our hospital with fever, vomiting and loss of consciousness. Beforehand, the patient was admitted in a further health care centre with the same complaints. At the mentioned medical facility, the patient was treated with serum therapy and antibiotic therapy (details unspecified). After experiencing some improvement in symptoms, the patient’s family decided to discharge the patient with their consent. However, two days later, the patient experienced a relapse and a deterioration of their symptoms. Additionally, the patient experienced two occurrences of seizure episodes within a time span of one day. As a result, the patient was referred to our medical centre.
The seizure episodes lasted around 2–3 min, with tonic-clonic uncontrollable jerky movements. Moreover, On the first examination upon arrival, the patient had high fever (39°C), was ill and in a stupor state, suffering from respiratory distress and subcostal retraction. Moreover, subsequent to performing neurological evaluations, it became apparent that the patient displayed amplified deep tendon reflexes and heightened muscle tones. The patient also exhibited neck rigidity. Moreover, a positive sign of Brudzinskis and Kernigs signs and bilateral upward plantar reflex were observed. A funduscopy and eye examination revealed no abnormal findings or papilledema. The first obtained results from paraclinical exam of the patient presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Laboratory findings of the patient at the first examination
| WBC (cells/mm3) | 16.8×1000 Mixed 5.7% Segment 67.2% Lymphocyte 27.2% |
| RBC (Million cells/mm3) | 2.94 |
| Hb (gm/dl) | 7.6 |
| M.C.V (fl) | 82.99 |
| Platelet (cells/mm3) | 670×1000 |
| CRP (mg/l) | 66 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 64 |
| Blood culture | No growth after 2 days |
| PCR COVID.19 | Not detected |
CRP, C reactive protein; ESR, Erythrocytes sedimentation rate; Hb, haemoglobin; M.C.V, Mean corpuscular volume; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell.
The chest radiography of the patient on the first day of visit did not indicate pneumonia or other respiratory disorders e.g. pleural effusion, pneumothorax (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Chest X-ray of the patient upon arrival.
The brain computed tomography (CT) scan was implemented which showed brain ventriculomegaly/hydrocephaly. Additionally, periventricular low density and thin uniform enhancement of the ependymal lining of the ventricles were observed (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

The initial brain computed tomography scan of the patient, which demonstrates the presence of ventriculomegaly.
Based on the patient’s symptoms of fever, loss of consciousness, and neck rigidity, empirical antibiotic treatment protocol involved the administration of ceftriaxone at a daily dosage of 2.5 g, divided into multiple doses. Additionally, Vancomycin was administered at a daily dosage of 1.5 g, also divided into multiple doses. Rifampin was prescribed at a daily dosage of 500 milligrams, also divided into multiple doses. This treatment regimen was followed for a duration of ~28 days. This decision was made due to the parents’ refusal of lumbar puncture and the potential presence of bacterial meningoencephalitis. Additionally, a brain
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and venography (MRV) were conducted, which revealed the presence of significant stenosis in the internal carotid arteries within the cavernosal and Supraclinoid regions on both sides. Additionally, evidence of stenosis in the middle cerebral artery was observed. (Figs. 3 and 4).
Figure 3.

Magnetic resonance venography of the patient.
Figure 4.

Magnetic resonance angiography of the patient revealing the stenosis of middle cerebral artery.
Furthermore, MRI was performed. The results of the MRI revealed the presence of multiple foci located at cerebellum, basal ganglia, and thalamus. Furthermore, minimal ependymal enhancement and intensely restricted diffusion of the layering debris, suggesting pyogenic ventriculitis were noted (Fig. 5A). Moreover, cerebellar infarcts in the territory of the right superior cerebellar artery and small lacunar infarcts were evident in the basal ganglia of the left side (Fig. 5B).
Figure 5.

(A) Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient in favour of ventriculitis. (B) Magnetic resonance imaging of the patient revealing infarcs.
Based on the presence of hydrocephalus determined through evidence, a therapeutic intervention was implemented for the patient in the form of an external ventricular drain placement and the CSF analysis findings is presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
CSF analysis of the patient
| Fluid type | CSF |
| Appearance | Semi clear |
| Colour | Colourless |
| WBC (cells/μl) | 90 PMN predominant |
| RBC (cells/μl) | 300 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 13 |
| Protein (mg/dl) | 10 |
| LDH (IU/l) | 2568 |
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; LDH, Lactate dehydrogenase; RBC, red blood cell; WBC, white blood cell.
the presence of low glucose levels in the cerebrospinal fluid strongly indicated a bacterial infection, even though there was no significant increase in protein levels. Further analysis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed the presence of Gram-positive Streptococci in the cerebrospinal fluid sample. Subsequent daily analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid showed a normalization of values, indicating a positive response to the antibiotic therapy. Therefore, the final diagnosis is confirmed as Streptococcal meningitis.
The patient was hospitalized for a duration of four weeks and subsequently discharged after their laboratory data, CSF analysis returned to normal, and level of consciousness elevated. However, the patient continued to experience ataxia, leading to a referral for physiotherapy and occupational therapy.
Discussion
Infectious meningitis and encephalitis are associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Acute bacterial meningitis is rapidly fatal and early recognition and institution of therapy is imperative6,10. Despite treatment, meningitis and encephalitis remain potentially life-threatening infections in children with mortality rates reaching up to 25%11. On the other hand, according to recent research, there has been an increase in cases of bacterial meningitis following the Covid-19 pandemic compared to before. This could be attributed to a potential decrease in focus on other vaccines during that time, as more attention was given to the Covid-19 vaccination program12.
Most prevalent bacterial agents leading to bacterial meningoencephalitis are Actinomyces sp, Bartonella henselae, Brucella sp, Chlamydia sp, Staphylococcus aureus, and streptococcus sp13,14. most children (more than 80%) with meningococcal disease present with some evidence of septicaemia. Other early symptoms include vomiting, diarrhoea, and myalgia. Some children (about 5%) present with features of septic shock but no rash.
In order for meningitis to occur, Streptococcus needs to infiltrate the human brain microvascular endothelial cells, which form a single-cell layer known as the blood-brain barrier. In vitro studies have demonstrated the ability of streptococcus to invade these cells intracellularly and undergo transcytosis within tissue culture monolayers of human brain microvascular endothelial cells15. Furthermore, in vitro investigations demonstrated that streptococcal bacteria necessitate the presence of the fibrinogen receptor FbsA, laminin-binding protein Lmb, or pilus backbone subunit protein PilB to invade human brain microvascular endothelial cells16. More recent studies have indicated that the surface-anchored serine-rich repeat motif glycoprotein Srr-1 is diminished in its ability to invade brain endothelial cells and contribute to meningitis production17. The body’s immune response to streptococcus plays a significant role in the development of meningitis and injury to the central nervous system. The inflammatory response is initiated by the blood-brain barrier endothelium, which activates specific genes involved in recruiting neutrophils, such as chemokines (e.g. IL-8, Groa), endothelial receptors (intercellular adhesion molecule-1), and neutrophil activators (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor)18. In neonatal rats with streptococcal meningitis, the presence of cortical lesions primarily in the vascular distribution suggests that disruptions in cerebral blood flow contribute to neuronal damage19.
Children who are affected by meningoencephalitis can experience a rapid onset of illness20. During this time, the levels of bacteria in their blood escalate rapidly. It is important to note that while most of these bacteria are no longer alive, they release fragments of their outer membrane known as blebs21.
CSF lactate is produced by bacterial anaerobic metabolism and is not affected by blood lactate concentration, an advantage over CSF glucose in differentiating bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis22. CSF lactate’s high negative likelihood ratio may make it useful for ruling out bacterial meningitis though pretreatment with antibiotics reduces clinical accuracy. CSF lactate of 35 mg/dl could be optimal cut-off value for distinguishing bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis23. CSF cytology, protein and glucose levels are normal in most cases, but mild pleocytosis or elevated protein levels are occasionally seen. Serum and CSF proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6, may be increased24.
Despite progress in prevention by vaccination, the global impact of bacterial meningitis is enormous. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of viral encephalitis in childhood was increasing also due to the growing incidence of emerging pathogens, such as enterovirus (EV)-A71 and West Nile virus in temperate climates as well as the wider use of immunosuppressive treatment and stem cell transplantation in childhood23. Neuroimaging studies may show diffuse or focal swelling of the brain parenchyma25. Among the clinical radiographic encephalopathy syndromes associated with meningitis, acute necrotizing encephalopathy is considered the most severe, associated with severe neurologic morbidity and mortality26.
The interpretation of radiological findings in this particular case posed challenges due to the presence of overlapping features with other potential diagnoses. The onset of the disease following an upper respiratory infection could potentially be misinterpreted as viral meningoencephalitis. Additionally, the presence of internal carotid stenosis and the sudden deterioration of the patient’s condition raised the possibility of inherited syndromes like moyamoya disease27.
Moreover, if a patient residing in an area with a high prevalence of tuberculosis exhibits symptoms of both loss of consciousness and hydrocephalus, it could indicate the potential presence of tubercular meningoencephalitis28. Therefore, it becomes crucial to thoroughly comprehend various uncommon radiological findings in order to differentiate and identify possible alternative diagnoses.
The treatment of bacterial meningoencephalitis is mostly supportive, antibiotically and may include intensive care. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of bacterial meningoencephalitis and septic shock has been crucial in advancing treatment options. Septic shock is mediated peripherally and centrally, the second of these through myocardial depression. This improved understanding has led to more rational inotropic prescribing and fluid management for the microcirculation. So better support for the microcirculation may also be beneficial29. Regarding our patient’s condition, the effectiveness of corticosteroids, IVIG, plasmapheresis and hypothermia needs further study30.
Conclusion
Paediatric bacterial meningoencephalitis is a medical emergency that requires a high index of clinical suspicion, rapid diagnosis, and early treatment. New vaccination programs have led to changes in the epidemiology of this disease. Advances in clinical and research techniques aid in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, and a combination of techniques is useful in confirming or rejecting the diagnosis. One method that can assist in refining our differential diagnosis is utilizing radiological findings. The case discussed in this report demonstrated that certain findings, such as arterial stenosis, hydrocephalus, ventriculitis, and widespread brain infarction, may indicate the presence of streptococcal meningoencephalitis
While antibiotics, steroids, and supportive care remain the mainstays of treatment, more research needs to be done on the role of adjuvant therapy.
Ethical approval
Firoozabadi Clinical Research Development Unit (FACRDU), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents/legal guardian for publication and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editorin-Chief of this journal on request.
Source of funding
There wasn’t any honorarium, grant, or other form of payment to authors to produce the manuscript.
Author contribution
M.Kachuei and R.Z. admitted the patient. S.S., M.Kachuei and R.Z. planned the treatment, M.Khalili reported the radiological findings, S.E., M.N., and H.M. gathered the data and wrote the draft. M.Kachuei and S.E. completed the manuscript. All authors finalized the manuscript and confirmed the final outcome.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.
Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)
Not applicable.
Guarantor
Maryam Kachuei.
Data availability statement
Not applicable.
Provenance and peer review
The paper was not invited.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Published online 22 January 2024
Contributor Information
Maryam Kachuei, Email: maryamka13977@gmail.com.
Ramin Zare, Email: afowl90@gmail.com.
Shirin Sayyahfar, Email: sayyahfar.sh@iums.ac.ir.
Mitra Khalili, Email: m.khalili76@yahoo.com.
Hamidreza Movahedi, Email: movahedi9898@gmail.com.
Mobin Naghshbandi, Email: Naghshbani.mobin@gmail.com.
Shayan Eghdami, Email: seghdami33@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Levent F, Baker CJ, Rench MA, et al. Early outcomes of group B streptococcal meningitis in the 21st century. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29:1009–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lefrock JL, Shapiro ED, Wenger J. Meningitis: Find it early, treat it fast. Patient Care 1991;25:133–146. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Evans AC, Freeman W. Studies on the Etiology of Epidemic Encephalitis: The Streptococcus. I: United States Public Health Service; 1926. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jubelt B, Mihai C, Li TM, et al. Rhombencephalitis/brainstem encephalitis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2011;11:543–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, et al. Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:835–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kafle D, Subedi M, Thapa M. Outcome of patients with meningitis and encephalitis at tertiary care hospital in eastern Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2017;57:40–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Berangi Z, Karami M, Mohammadi Y, et al. Epidemiological profile of meningitis in Iran before pentavalent vaccine introduction. BMC Pediatr 2019;19:370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miner JR, Heegaard W, Mapes A, et al. Presentation, time to antibiotics, and mortality of patients with bacterial meningitis at an urban county medical center. J Emerg Med 2001;21:387–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hasbun R. Progress and challenges in bacterial meningitis: a review. JAMA 2022;328:2147–2154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bystritsky RJ, Chow FC. Infectious meningitis and encephalitis. Neurol Clin 2022;40:77–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuriki M, Fujihra N, Hasegawa S, et al. Acute encephalitis and bacterial meningitis in children in Aichi Prefecture (1984-1993). [Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi] Japanese. J Public Health (Bangkok) 1995;42:338–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bloom DE, Bonanni P, Martinón-Torres F, et al. Meningococcal disease in the Post–COVID-19 era: a time to prepare. Infect Dis Ther 2023;12:2649–2663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lewis P, Glaser CA. Encephalitis. Pediatr Rev 2005;26:353–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goudarzi A, Sarmadian R, Yousefichaijan P, et al. Streptococcus Viridans meningitis in an immunocompetent child: a case report. Clin Case Rep 2023;11:e7058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nizet V, Kim KS, Stins M, et al. Invasion of brain microvascular endothelial cells by group B streptococci. Infect Immun 1997;65:5074–5081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tenenbaum T, Bloier C, Adam RD, et al. Adherence to and invasion of human brain microvascular endothelial cells are promoted by fibrinogen-binding protein FbsA of Streptococcus agalactiae. Infect Immun 2005;73:4404–4409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Sorge NM, Quach D, Gurney MA, et al. The group B streptococcal serine-rich repeat 1 glycoprotein mediates penetration of the blood-brain barrier. J Infect Dis 2009;199:1479–1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Doran KS, Liu GY, Nizet V. Group B streptococcal β-hemolysin/cytolysin activates neutrophil signaling pathways in brain endothelium and contributes to development of meningitis. J Clin Invest 2003;112:736–744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim Y, Sheldon R, Elliot B, et al. Brain damage in neonatal meningitis caused by group B streptococci in rats. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1995;54:531–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jan M. Meningitis and encephalitis in infants and children. Neurosciences 2011;1:11–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keyel PA, Loultcheva L, Roth R, et al. Streptolysin O clearance through sequestration into blebs that bud passively from the plasma membrane. J Cell Sci 2011;124:2414–2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010;23:467–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edmond K, Clark A, Korczak VS, et al. Global and regional risk of disabling sequelae from bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:317–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gossger N, Snape MD, Yu L-M, et al. Immunogenicity and tolerability of recombinant serogroup B meningococcal vaccine administered with or without routine infant vaccinations according to different immunization schedules: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;307:573–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sakushima K, Hayashino Y, Kawaguchi T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid lactate for differentiating bacterial meningitis from aseptic meningitis: a meta-analysis. J Infect 2011;62:255–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rudolph H, Porto L, Tenenbaum T. Severe courses of meningitis and encephalitis in children and adolescents. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde 2022;170:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kim T, Bang JS, Kwon O-K, et al. Morphology and related hemodynamics of the internal carotid arteries of moyamoya patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015;157:755–761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kachuei M, Zare R, Sadr Z, et al. Pediatric acute hydrocephalus developing after tubercular meningitis: a case report study. Ann Med Surg 2023;10:1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bosis S, Mayer A, Esposito S. Meningococcal disease in childhood: epidemiology, clinical features and prevention. J Prev Med Hyg 2015;56:E121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Munakata M, Kato R, Yokoyama H, et al. Combined therapy with hypothermia and anticytokine agents in influenza A encephalopathy. Brain Dev 2000;22:373–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
